Final2022 Week 10
SoFi Stadium, Inglewood, CA|
Arizona Cardinals vs Los Angeles Rams, Week 10 2022
Arizona Cardinals
AwayWon
27
Los Angeles Rams
Home
17
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardinals | 3 | 14 | 0 | 10 | 27 |
| Rams | 3 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 17 |
ARI 27 · LAR 17 Final
Passing leader
Colt McCoy
ARI · QB
13.9PPR pts
26/37, 238 YDS, 1 TD
Top fantasy scorer
ARI · RB
23.6PPR pts
21 ATT, 69 YDS, 2 TD, 3 REC, 17 REC YDS
Rams leader
LAR · TE
15.3PPR pts
8 REC, 73 YDS
Defensive playmaker
Budda Baker
ARI
1 INT, 4 TKL
Cardinals 27, Rams 17: Arizona beats Los Angeles
Arizona led 17–3 at halftime after a 14-point second quarter and won 27–17, though Los Angeles took the second half 14–10. The Cardinals finished with a 298–256 edge in total offense and averaged 4.6 yards per play.
The gap showed up everywhere. The Rams went 3-for-11 on third down and committed two turnovers, while the Cardinals kept the ball for 32:01 and finished without a giveaway.
The two teams meet again in Week 6 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +0.3 yards/play ARI 4.6 · LAR 4.3
- +2 turnover margin ARI 0 turnovers
- +42 total yards ARI 298 · LAR 256
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Cardinal or Ram on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Cardinals Won
Arizona won the efficiency, turnover, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Cardinals | Stat | Rams |
|---|---|---|
| 4.6 | Yards per play | 4.3 |
| 0 | Turnovers | 2 |
| 298 | Total yards | 256 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 65 | Plays | 60 |
| 33% | Third-down conversion | 27% |
| 32:01 | Time of possession | 27:59 |
Scoring Summary
The Cardinals scored three touchdowns and two field goals; the Rams scored two touchdowns and one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | ARI | LAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 6:16 | LAR | Matt Gay 36-yard FG Takes lead | 0 | 3 |
| 0:13 | ARI | Tristan Vizcaino 36-yard FG Ties game | 3 | 3 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 1:56 | ARI | James Conner 4-yard TD run Takes leadTristan Vizcaino XP | 10 | 3 |
| 0:24 | ARI | Colt McCoy → A.J. Green, 6-yard TD Extends leadTristan Vizcaino XP | 17 | 3 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 4:24 | LAR | Darrell Henderson Jr. 4-yard TD runMatt Gay XP | 17 | 10 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 7:41 | ARI | James Conner 9-yard TD run Extends leadTristan Vizcaino XP | 24 | 10 |
| 3:44 | ARI | Tristan Vizcaino 46-yard FG Extends lead | 27 | 10 |
| 0:07 | LAR | John Wolford → Van Jefferson, 3-yard TDMatt Gay XP | 27 | 17 |
Fantasy Points: Cardinals vs Rams, Week 10 2022
Fantasy leaders
- James ConnerARI · RB23.6 PTSRB3
- DeAndre HopkinsARI · WR19.8 PTSWR12
- Rondale MooreARI · WR18.4 PTSWR16
- Tyler HigbeeLAR · TE15.3 PTSTE5
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13.9 | QB23 | 26/37 | 238 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 96.5 | ||
| 9.8 | QB25 | 24/36 | 212 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 79.9 | ||
| 0.3 | QB30 | 1/1 | -3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 79.2 |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.6 | RB3 | RB | 21 | 69 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 0 | ||
| 19.8 | WR12 | WR | — | — | — | 14 | 10 | 98 | 0 | ||
| 18.4 | WR16 | WR | — | — | — | 13 | 9 | 94 | 0 | ||
| 15.3 | TE5 | TE | — | — | — | 8 | 8 | 73 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 11.7 | WR37 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 27 | 1 | ||
| 10.2 | RB26 | RB | 6 | 21 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | ||
| 9.0 | WR47 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 10 | 1 | ||
| 8.4 | WR49 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 44 | 0 | ||
| 6.9 | RB34 | RB | 1 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 30 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.4 | WR78 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 2 | 14 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.9 | WR80 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | -1 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.2 | RB53 | RB | 6 | 22 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2.2 | TE32 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | ||
| 2.1 | TE34 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 11 | 0 | ||
| 1.7 | TE42 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.7 | WR101 | WR | 1 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0.5 | RB67 | RB | 1 | 5 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fantasy Usage
Arizona Cardinals
Snap Share
Rondale MooreWR66 snaps97%
James ConnerRB65 snaps96%
DeAndre HopkinsWR64 snaps94%
Trey McBrideTE62 snaps91%
A.J. GreenWR30 snaps44%
Target Share35 targets
- DeAndre Hopkins40%, 14 targets
- Rondale Moore37%, 13 targets
- James Conner9%, 3 targets
- A.J. Green6%, 2 targets
- Zach Ertz3%, 1 targets
- Other6%, 2 targets
Carry Share26 carries
- James Conner81%, 21 carries
- Colt McCoy15%, 4 carries
- Keaontay Ingram4%, 1 carries
Los Angeles Rams
Snap Share
Ben SkowronekWR59 snaps98%
Allen RobinsonWR55 snaps92%
Tyler HigbeeTE48 snaps80%
Cooper KuppWR40 snaps67%
Darrell HendersonRB34 snaps57%
Target Share37 targets
- Tyler Higbee22%, 8 targets
- Ben Skowronek19%, 7 targets
- Allen Robinson16%, 6 targets
- Cooper Kupp14%, 5 targets
- Van Jefferson8%, 3 targets
- Other22%, 8 targets
Carry Share20 carries
- Darrell Henderson30%, 6 carries
- Cam Akers30%, 6 carries
- John Wolford15%, 3 carries
- Bryce Perkins15%, 3 carries
- Brandon Powell5%, 1 carries
- Other5%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 59 | 98% | 7 | 19% | 0 | |
| 66 | 97% | 13 | 37% | 0 | |
| 65 | 96% | 3 | 9% | 21 | |
| 64 | 94% | 14 | 40% | 0 | |
| 55 | 92% | 6 | 16% | 0 | |
| 62 | 91% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 48 | 80% | 8 | 22% | 0 | |
| 40 | 67% | 5 | 14% | 0 | |
| 34 | 57% | 1 | 3% | 6 | |
| 30 | 44% | 2 | 6% | 0 | |
| 25 | 37% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 17 | 28% | 3 | 8% | 0 | |
| 16 | 27% | 3 | 8% | 1 | |
| 13 | 22% | 2 | 5% | 0 | |
| 10 | 17% | 1 | 3% | 6 | |
| 9 | 13% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 8 | 12% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 5 | 8% | 1 | 3% | 1 | |
| 5 | 7% | 0 | 0% | 1 | |
| 3 | 5% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 2 | 3% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 1% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+6.7Van Jefferson11.7 PTS vs 5.0 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−8.3Ben Skowronek3.4 PTS vs 11.7 xFP
- Highest expected volume23.3 xFPDeAndre Hopkins19.8 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeAndre HopkinsARI · WR | 19.8 | 23.3 | −3.5 | 94% | 40% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 14 | 40% |
| Rondale MooreARI · WR | 18.4 | 21.7 | −3.3 | 97% | 37% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 13 | 37% |
| James ConnerARI · RB | 23.6 | 18.5 | +5.1 | 96% | 81% car | — | 0 | 21 | 81% | 3 | 9% |
| Colt McCoyARI · QB | 13.9 | 18.2 | −4.3 | 97% | 37 att | — | 37 | 4 | 15% | 0 | 0% |
| John WolfordLAR · QB | 9.8 | 17.2 | −7.4 | 92% | 36 att | — | 36 | 3 | 15% | 0 | 0% |
| Tyler HigbeeLAR · TE | 15.3 | 13.3 | +2.0 | 80% | 22% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 22% |
| Ben SkowronekLAR · WR | 3.4 | 11.7 | −8.3 | 98% | 19% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 19% |
| Allen RobinsonLAR · WR | 8.4 | 10.0 | −1.6 | 92% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 16% |
| Cooper KuppLAR · WR | 2.9 | 8.3 | −5.4 | 67% | 14% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 14% |
| Kyren WilliamsLAR · RB | 6.9 | 5.6 | +1.3 | 27% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 5% | 3 | 8% |
| Cam AkersLAR · RB | 2.2 | 5.5 | −3.3 | 17% | 30% car | — | 0 | 6 | 30% | 1 | 3% |
| Darrell Henderson Jr.LAR · RB | 10.2 | 5.5 | +4.7 | 57% | 30% car | — | 0 | 6 | 30% | 1 | 3% |
| Van JeffersonLAR · WR | 11.7 | 5.0 | +6.7 | 28% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 8% |
| A.J. GreenARI · WR | 9.0 | 3.3 | +5.7 | 44% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
| Brycen HopkinsLAR · TE | 2.1 | 3.3 | −1.2 | 22% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 5% |
| Bryce PerkinsLAR · QB | 0.3 | 2.4 | −2.1 | 8% | 1 att | — | 1 | 3 | 15% | 0 | 0% |
| Brandon PowellLAR · WR | 0.7 | 2.3 | −1.6 | 8% | 5% car | — | 0 | 1 | 5% | 1 | 3% |
| Stephen AndersonARI · TE | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 37% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Trey McBrideARI · TE | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 91% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Zach ErtzARI · TE | 2.2 | 1.7 | +0.5 | 13% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Keaontay IngramARI · RB | 0.5 | 0.6 | −0.1 | 7% | 4% car | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Cardinals 35 targets and 26 carries; Rams 37 targets and 20 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2022 season: 1.67 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.64 per carry and 0.42 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Colt McCoy
ARI · QB · 13.9 pts on 18.2 expected
26 of 37 passing for 238 yards, 1 touchdown; 4 carries for 4 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 18.2 expected.
John Wolford Unlucky
LAR · QB · 9.8 pts on 17.2 expected
24 of 36 passing for 212 yards, 1 touchdown, 1 interception; 3 carries for 3 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 17.2 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
DeAndre Hopkins Volume, no payoff
ARI · WR · 19.8 pts on 23.3 expected
14 targets (40% of the team's), 10 catches for 98 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 23.3 expected.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 20.3, 33.9, 13.6, 19.8
W7W8W9W10
Rondale Moore Volume, no payoff
ARI · WR · 18.4 pts on 21.7 expected
13 targets (37% of the team's), 9 catches for 94 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 21.7 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 13.1, 10.9, 4.1, 23.4, 14.9, 18.4
W5W6W7W8W9W10
Season high in targets (13).
Tyler Higbee
LAR · TE · 15.3 pts on 13.3 expected
8 targets (22% of the team's), 8 catches for 73 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 13.3 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 17.3, 11.6, 1.7, 3.5, 0.0, 15.3
W4W5W6W8W9W10
Best score since Week 4.
Ben Skowronek Unlucky
LAR · WR · 3.4 pts on 11.7 expected
7 targets (19% of the team's), 2 catches for 14 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 11.7 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 5.3, 10.1, 16.7, 2.0, 0.0, 3.4
W4W5W6W8W9W10
James Conner Ran hot
ARI · RB · 23.6 pts on 18.5 expected
3 targets (9% of the team's), 3 catches for 17 yards; 21 carries (81% of the team's) for 69 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 18.5 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 7.1, 8.7, 10.7, 7.3, 11.4, 23.6
W2W3W4W5W9W10
Season high in carries (21). Best fantasy game of the season.
Cooper Kupp Unlucky
LAR · WR · 2.9 pts on 8.3 expected
5 targets (14% of the team's), 3 catches for -1 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 8.3 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 26.2, 25.9, 16.7, 22.9, 26.8, 2.9
W4W5W6W8W9W10
Lowest-scoring game of the season. A touchdown in 5 of the last 8 games.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Arizona Cardinals
- ▲Stock up: James Conner played 96% of the snaps, up from a 54% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Stephen Anderson played 37% of the snaps, up from a 8% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Trey McBride played 91% of the snaps, up from a 25% season average.
Los Angeles Rams
- ▲Stock up: Ben Skowronek played 98% of the snaps, up from a 79% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Cooper Kupp played 67% of the snaps, down from a 99% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Cam Akers played 17% of the snaps, down from a 33% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2022 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Cardinals D | Rams D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 18.0 | 14.9 |
| RBs | 25.4 | 21.1 |
| WRs | 30.2 | 31.8 |
| TEs | 16.7 | 11.1 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Los Angeles opened at 60% win probability and fell below 2% in the fourth quarter.
Rams win probability
Key Swings
- +9Gay 36-yd FG59% → 68%Q1 6:16
- −10Vizcaino 36-yd FG68% → 59%Q1 0:13
- −27Conner 4-yd TD run58% → 30%Q2 1:56
- −19McCoy → Green, 6-yd TD29% → 10%Q2 0:24
- +18Henderson 4-yd TD run5% → 22%Q3 4:24
Swing in Rams win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Arizona Cardinals | Measure | Los Angeles Rams |
|---|---|---|
| 65 | Plays | 60 |
| 60% | Pass rate | 67% |
| 5.6 | Yds / dropback | 4.8 |
| 3.0 | Yds / carry | 3.3 |
| 5/15 | Third downs | 3/11 |
Efficiency edge Arizona ran 5 more plays and gained 0.8 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- ARI Hopkins 40% · Moore 37% · Conner 9%
- LAR Higbee 22% · Skowronek 19% · Robinson 16%
Possession Results
| Result | ARI | LAR |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 3 | 2 |
| Field goals | 2 | 1 |
| Punts | 5 | 5 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 2 |
ARI turnover edge: +2
- The Rams opened the scoring on their first possession, a 14-play, 57-yard drive that ended in a field goal.
- The Cardinals drained the clock with two second-half drives of four to six minutes.
All 22 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAR | Q1 15:00 | 14 | 57 | 8:44 | Field goal |
| ARI | Q1 6:16 | 14 | 57 | 6:03 | Field goal |
| LAR | Q1 0:13 | 3 | 4 | 0:38 | Punt |
| ARI | Q2 14:35 | 3 | 7 | 1:39 | Punt |
| LAR | Q2 12:56 | 3 | -1 | 1:23 | Punt |
| ARI | Q2 11:33 | 3 | 9 | 0:54 | Punt |
| LAR | Q2 10:39 | 3 | -1 | 2:12 | Punt |
| ARI | Q2 8:27 | 13 | 66 | 6:31 | Touchdown |
| LAR | Q2 1:56 | 4 | 10 | 0:22 | Fumble |
| ARI | Q2 1:34 | 5 | 30 | 1:10 | Touchdown |
| LAR | Q2 0:24 | 1 | -1 | 0:24 | End of half |
| ARI | Q3 15:00 | 5 | 14 | 2:49 | Punt |
| LAR | Q3 12:11 | 4 | 14 | 3:14 | Punt |
| ARI | Q3 8:57 | 3 | -5 | 1:26 | Punt |
| LAR | Q3 7:31 | 7 | 59 | 3:07 | Touchdown |
| ARI | Q3 4:24 | 7 | 35 | 4:30 | Punt |
| LAR | Q4 14:54 | 5 | 12 | 2:10 | Punt |
| ARI | Q4 12:44 | 9 | 60 | 5:03 | Touchdown |
| LAR | Q4 7:41 | 6 | 29 | 2:08 | Interception |
| ARI | Q4 5:33 | 4 | -3 | 1:49 | Field goal |
| LAR | Q4 3:44 | 11 | 75 | 3:37 | Touchdown |
| ARI | Q4 0:07 | 1 | -1 | 0:07 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Cardinals vs Rams Head-to-Head
One of the NFL's oldest matchups: the two franchises first met in 1937, when the Cardinals played in Chicago and the Rams in Cleveland, and they have been NFC West rivals since 2002.
- All-time series
- 53–41–2Rams lead, 96 meetings since 1937
- Postseason
- 2–0Rams won in 1975 and 2021
- Largest Cardinals win
- 44–62016
- Largest Rams win
- 34–02018
Since 2021
8–3 Rams lead
11 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- C
- R
- R
- R
- C
- R
- R
- C
- R
- R
- R
Oldest to newest. R = Rams win, C = Cardinals win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 6 Cardinals at Rams Upcoming
- Week 10 Rams at Cardinals Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wk 18 Cardinals at Rams, 2025 Wk 18 recap LAR 37 ARI 20 LAR W
- 2025 Wk 14 Rams at Cardinals, 2025 Wk 14 recap LAR 45 ARI 17 LAR W
- 2024 Wk 17 Cardinals at Rams, 2024 Wk 17 recap LAR 13 ARI 9 LAR W
- 2024 Wk 2 Rams at Cardinals, 2024 Wk 2 recap ARI 41 LAR 10 ARI W
- 2023 Wk 12 Rams at Cardinals, 2023 Wk 12 recap LAR 37 ARI 14 LAR W
- 2023 Wk 6 Cardinals at Rams, 2023 Wk 6 recap LAR 26 ARI 9 LAR W
- 2022 Wk 10 Cardinals at Rams ARI 27 LAR 17 ARI W
- 2022 Wk 3 Rams at Cardinals, 2022 Wk 3 recap LAR 20 ARI 12 LAR W
- 2021 Wild Card Cardinals at Rams, 2021 Wild Card recap LAR 34 ARI 11 LAR W
- 2021 Wk 14 Rams at Cardinals, 2021 Wk 14 recap LAR 30 ARI 23 LAR W
- 2021 Wk 4 Cardinals at Rams, 2021 Wk 4 recap ARI 37 LAR 20 ARI W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2022 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Cardinals | Stat | Rams |
|---|---|---|
| 4-13 | Record | 5-12 |
| 20.0 | Points per game | 18.1 |
| 323.5 | Yards per game | 280.5 |
| 4.8 | Yards per play | 4.8 |
| 26.4 | Points allowed per game | 22.6 |
| 348.9 | Yards allowed per game | 341.1 |
Cardinals vs Rams Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- LAR −3.5Rams failed to cover by 13.5
- Total
- 38Over: 44 points scored (by 6)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rams | 20.8 | 17 | −3.8 |
| Cardinals | 17.3 | 27 | +9.8 |
The Cardinals beat their implied total and the Rams fell short of theirs; the Fantasy tab has the player lines behind it.
Betting Trends
Last 5 meetings: Rams 3–2 ATS, overs 3–2.
Each team's 2022 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Arizona Cardinals
- Against the spread
- 5–5
- Over/under
- 5–4–1
- ATS as favorite
- 1–2
- ATS as underdog
- 4–3
- ATS on the road
- 3–2
Los Angeles Rams
- Against the spread
- 2–6–1
- Over/under
- 3–6
- ATS as favorite
- 2–3
- ATS as underdog
- 0–3–1
- ATS at home
- 1–5
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Cardinals vs Rams Fantasy Outlook for 2026
Two meetings are left on the 2026 schedule: Week 6 in Los Angeles and Week 10 in Arizona. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Cardinals or Rams player start in Week 6? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Cardinals and Rams players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Cardinals and Rams defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere these two matchups fall in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2022 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Cardinals vs Rams Game FAQ
Who won the 2022 Cardinals vs Rams Week 10 game?
The Arizona Cardinals beat the Los Angeles Rams 27–17 in Week 10 of the 2022 season. The game was played at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, CA, on November 13, 2022. See the Cardinals' 2022 schedule.
What was the final score of Cardinals vs Rams?
The final score was Cardinals 27, Rams 17. The Cardinals led 17–3 at halftime, and the second half went Cardinals 10, Rams 14.
What happened in the Cardinals vs Rams game?
Arizona led 17–3 at halftime after a 14-point second quarter and won 27–17, though Los Angeles took the second half 14–10. The Cardinals finished with a 298–256 edge in total offense and averaged 4.6 yards per play. James Conner led all players with 3 catches for 17 yards, plus 21 carries for 69 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. The Rams committed 2 turnovers, the Cardinals none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Cardinals vs Rams?
James Conner led the game with 23.6 PPR fantasy points, the RB3 of Week 10, on 3 catches for 17 yards, plus 21 carries for 69 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. DeAndre Hopkins was next with 19.8 (WR12). See James Conner's 2022 game log.
Who led Cardinals vs Rams in passing, rushing and receiving?
Colt McCoy (ARI) led all passers with 26 of 37 for 238 yards and a touchdown. James Conner (ARI) led in rushing with 21 carries for 69 yards and 2 touchdowns. DeAndre Hopkins (ARI) led in receiving with 10 catches for 98 yards.
How many fantasy points did James Conner score against the Rams?
James Conner scored 23.6 points in PPR leagues, 22.1 in half-PPR and 20.6 in standard scoring against the Rams in Week 10 of the 2022 season, on 3 catches for 17 yards, plus 21 carries for 69 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. He handled 81% of his team's carries.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Cardinals vs Rams?
Van Jefferson outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 11.7 PPR points on 5.0 xFP (+6.7). Ben Skowronek fell furthest short, with 3.4 points on 11.7 xFP (−8.3). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
How did the Cardinals beat the Rams?
The Cardinals beat the Rams 27–17 because they averaged 4.6 yards per play to 4.3, won the turnover battle 2–0, and outgained them 298–256.
Which team won the turnover battle in Cardinals vs Rams?
The Cardinals won the turnover battle 2–0: the Rams gave the ball away 2 times and the Cardinals not at all. The Cardinals won the game.
What is the all-time Cardinals vs Rams record?
The Rams lead the all-time series 53–41–2 across 96 meetings since 1937, including a 2–0 record in the postseason.
When did the Cardinals and Rams last play before this game?
Before Week 10 of 2022, they last met in the 2022 season on September 25, 2022, when the Rams beat the Cardinals 20–12.
Have the Cardinals and Rams met in the playoffs?
Yes, 2 times, most recently in the 2021 playoffs. The Cardinals are 0–2 against the Rams in the postseason.
What was the closing spread for Cardinals vs Rams?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Rams −3.5, making the Los Angeles Rams 3.5-point favorites, with a closing total of 38. That implied about 20.8 points for the Rams and 17.3 for the Cardinals.
Did Cardinals vs Rams go over or under the total?
The game went over. The consensus closing total was 38, and the teams combined for 44 points, 6 over the number.
Who covered the spread in Cardinals vs Rams?
The Cardinals covered as 3.5-point underdogs against the closing line of Rams −3.5. The final margin was 10 points.
