Start Mack Hollins. Hollins is projected for 9.1 PPR points vs 7.5 for Efton Chism III, and faces the 9th-softest defense against WRs this week.
Updated Nov 7, 4:39 PM ET
| Mack Hollins WR · NE | Efton Chism III WR · NE | |
|---|---|---|
| Projection (Week 9, avg of sources) | 9.1 | 7.5 |
| Floor (lowest source) | 7.7 | 6.2 |
| Ceiling (highest source) | 10.3 | 9.3 |
| StatChasers projection | 9.3 (WR47) | 6.2 (WR61) |
| Opponent | vs GB | vs GB |
| Opponent vs. position | 9th-softest (34.8 pts/g allowed) | 9th-softest (34.8 pts/g allowed) |
| Recent usage | 17% target share (last 3) | 9% target share (last 3) |
| Position | WR | WR |
| Our call | SIT · Bench | SIT · Bench |
Settle every start/sit call with projections, matchup, recent usage and floor-versus-ceiling for your exact scoring settings.
Start Mack Hollins. Hollins projects for 9.1 PPR points vs GB, against 7.5 for Efton Chism III vs GB: a 1.6-point edge.
The projection is the average of every source that carries each player this week, and a player listed Out or Doubtful is never the start.
Mack Hollins is projected to score more: 9.1 PPR points to 7.5 for Efton Chism III.
The sources range from 7.7 to 10.3 for Hollins and from 6.2 to 9.3 for Chism III. The ranges overlap, so Chism III outscoring Hollins is a realistic result.
Mack Hollins is the safer start: even the most cautious projection source has Hollins at 7.7 PPR points, against 6.2 for Efton Chism III.
Start the higher floor when you are favored and only need to avoid a dud.
Mack Hollins has the higher ceiling: the most optimistic projection source has Hollins at 10.3 PPR points, against 9.3 for Efton Chism III.
Start the higher ceiling when you are the underdog and need points more than safety.
Mack Hollins plays GB and Efton Chism III plays GB in Week 9.
By fantasy points allowed to each position, Hollins faces the 9th-softest defense against WRs and Chism III faces the 9th-softest defense against WRs, so Mack Hollins has the softer matchup.
Each projection already accounts for the opponent, so a soft matchup is a tiebreaker, not a reason to bench the higher projection.
Over his recent games Mack Hollins has drawn 17% of his team's targets, and Efton Chism III 9% of his team's targets.
Mack Hollins has the bigger role, and volume is the steadiest thing a projection rests on.
These numbers are in PPR. Full PPR adds a point per catch, so it helps whichever player sees more targets, which here is Mack Hollins.
Switch between PPR, Half PPR and Standard on the board above to rescore both players from the same sources.
Neither Mack Hollins nor Efton Chism III has an injury designation for Week 9.
Designations change through the week, so check again before kickoff; this page updates with each refresh.
Each figure is the average of the projection sources that carry the player this week: StatChasers, Sleeper, ESPN, numberFire, FFToday and the betting markets (sportsbook player props). Mack Hollins is projected by 5 of them and Efton Chism III by 6.
A source with no number for a player is left out of the average rather than counted as a zero.