Parker Washington vs. Luther Burden III: Who Should You Start in Week 8?

Start Parker Washington. Washington is projected for 16.7 PPR points vs 12.8 for Luther Burden III, and faces the 8th-toughest defense against WRs this week.

Updated Oct 30, 7:29 AM ET

Parker Washington vs. Luther Burden III: Week 8 side by side

Parker Washington
WR · JAX
Luther Burden III
WR · CHI
Projection (Week 8, avg of sources)16.712.8
Floor (lowest source)16.112.3
Ceiling (highest source)18.413.4
StatChasers projection16.3 (WR9)12.4 (WR23)
Opponentvs INDvs SEA
Opponent vs. position8th-toughest (29.0 pts/g allowed)1st-toughest (20.9 pts/g allowed)
Recent usage23% target share (last 3)18% target share (last 3)
PositionWRWR
Our callSTART · Strong WR1START · WR2

Settle every start/sit call with projections, matchup, recent usage and floor-versus-ceiling for your exact scoring settings.

Parker Washington vs. Luther Burden III Week 8 Start/Sit FAQ

Should I start Parker Washington or Luther Burden III in Week 8?

Start Parker Washington. Washington projects for 16.7 PPR points vs IND, against 12.8 for Luther Burden III vs SEA: a 3.9-point edge.

The projection is the average of every source that carries each player this week, and a player listed Out or Doubtful is never the start.

Parker Washington vs. Luther Burden III: who will score more fantasy points in Week 8?

Parker Washington is projected to score more: 16.7 PPR points to 12.8 for Luther Burden III.

The sources range from 16.1 to 18.4 for Washington and from 12.3 to 13.4 for Burden III. Even Burden III's highest projection is below Washington's lowest.

Who is the safer start in Week 8, Parker Washington or Luther Burden III?

Parker Washington is the safer start: even the most cautious projection source has Washington at 16.1 PPR points, against 12.3 for Luther Burden III.

Start the higher floor when you are favored and only need to avoid a dud.

Who has the higher ceiling in Week 8, Parker Washington or Luther Burden III?

Parker Washington has the higher ceiling: the most optimistic projection source has Washington at 18.4 PPR points, against 13.4 for Luther Burden III.

Start the higher ceiling when you are the underdog and need points more than safety.

Who has the better matchup in Week 8, Parker Washington or Luther Burden III?

Parker Washington plays IND and Luther Burden III plays SEA in Week 8.

By fantasy points allowed to each position, Washington faces the 8th-toughest defense against WRs and Burden III faces the 1st-toughest defense against WRs, so Parker Washington has the softer matchup.

Each projection already accounts for the opponent, so a soft matchup is a tiebreaker, not a reason to bench the higher projection.

Who gets more volume, Parker Washington or Luther Burden III?

Over his recent games Parker Washington has drawn 23% of his team's targets, and Luther Burden III 18% of his team's targets.

Parker Washington has the bigger role, and volume is the steadiest thing a projection rests on.

Does PPR scoring change Parker Washington vs. Luther Burden III?

These numbers are in PPR. Full PPR adds a point per catch, so it helps whichever player sees more targets, which here is Parker Washington.

Switch between PPR, Half PPR and Standard on the board above to rescore both players from the same sources.

Are Parker Washington and Luther Burden III playing in Week 8?

Neither Parker Washington nor Luther Burden III has an injury designation for Week 8.

Designations change through the week, so check again before kickoff; this page updates with each refresh.

Where do the Parker Washington and Luther Burden III projections come from?

Each figure is the average of the projection sources that carry the player this week: StatChasers, Sleeper, ESPN, numberFire, FFToday and the betting markets (sportsbook player props). Parker Washington is projected by 5 of them and Luther Burden III by 5.

A source with no number for a player is left out of the average rather than counted as a zero.

Other comparisons

Other Parker Washington comparisons

Other Luther Burden III comparisons