Final2023 Week 12
SoFi Stadium, Inglewood, CA|
Baltimore Ravens vs Los Angeles Chargers, Week 12 2023
Baltimore Ravens
AwayWon
20
Los Angeles Chargers
Home
10
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ravens | 0 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 20 |
| Chargers | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 10 |
BAL 20 · LAC 10 Final
Passing leader
LAC · QB
14.4PPR pts
29/44, 217 YDS, 1 TD, 1 INT
Top fantasy scorer
BAL · WR
23.2PPR pts
5 REC, 25 YDS, 1 TD, 1 RUSH TD
Chargers leader
LAC · WR
22.6PPR pts
14 REC, 106 YDS
Defensive playmaker
Arthur Maulet
BAL
1 INT, 1 TKL
Ravens 20, Chargers 10: Baltimore beats Los Angeles
Baltimore led 10–3 at halftime and outscored Los Angeles 10–7 after the break to win 20–10. The Ravens finished with a 361–279 edge in total offense and averaged 5.2 yards per play.
The Chargers went 7-for-15 on third down and committed four turnovers, while the Ravens kept the ball for 33:23 and finished without a giveaway.
The two teams meet again in Week 10 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +1.0 yards/play BAL 5.2 · LAC 4.2
- +4 turnover margin BAL 0 turnovers
- +82 total yards BAL 361 · LAC 279
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Raven or Charger on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Ravens Won
Baltimore won the efficiency, turnover, and time of possession battles.
| Ravens | Stat | Chargers |
|---|---|---|
| 5.2 | Yards per play | 4.2 |
| 0 | Turnovers | 4 |
| 361 | Total yards | 279 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 69 | Plays | 66 |
| 31% | Third-down conversion | 47% |
| 33:23 | Time of possession | 26:37 |
Scoring Summary
The Ravens scored two touchdowns and two field goals; the Chargers scored one touchdown and one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | BAL | LAC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 9:03 | LAC | Cameron Dicker 39-yard FG Takes lead | 0 | 3 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 10:41 | BAL | Lamar Jackson → Zay Flowers, 3-yard TD Takes leadJustin Tucker XP | 7 | 3 |
| 1:12 | BAL | Justin Tucker 42-yard FG Extends lead | 10 | 3 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 10:53 | BAL | Justin Tucker 48-yard FG Extends lead | 13 | 3 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 8:32 | LAC | Justin Herbert → Gerald Everett, 3-yard TDCameron Dicker XP | 13 | 10 |
| 1:36 | BAL | Zay Flowers 37-yard TD run Extends leadJustin Tucker XP | 20 | 10 |
Fantasy Points: Ravens vs Chargers, Week 12 2023
Fantasy leaders
- Zay FlowersBAL · WR23.2 PTSWR6
- Keenan AllenLAC · WR22.6 PTSWR7
- Lamar JacksonBAL · QB15.0 PTSQB14
- Justin HerbertLAC · QB14.4 PTSQB15
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14.4 | QB15 | 29/44 | 217 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 47 | 0 | 75.7 | Start/Sit → | |
| 15.0 | QB14 | 18/32 | 177 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 39 | 0 | 82.4 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.2 | WR6 | WR | 1 | 37 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 25 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 22.6 | WR7 | WR | — | — | — | 16 | 14 | 106 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 14.3 | TE6 | TE | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 43 | 1 | ||
| 10.9 | RB26 | RB | 9 | 64 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 25 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.4 | RB31 | RB | 10 | 32 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 32 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.0 | TE19 | TE | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 40 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.4 | WR66 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 34 | 0 | ||
| 4.7 | RB48 | RB | 8 | 26 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | ||
| 4.1 | WR83 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 2 | 21 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.4 | RB52 | RB | 3 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | ||
| 3.1 | RB53 | RB | 5 | 31 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.1 | WR94 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 21 | 0 | ||
| 2.7 | WR98 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 17 | 0 | ||
| 1.7 | WR110 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 7 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.4 | WR117 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | ||
| 1.1 | WR119 | WR | 2 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | WR | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Baltimore Ravens
Snap Share
Zay FlowersWR67 snaps94%
Rashod BatemanWR57 snaps80%
Isaiah LikelyTE52 snaps73%
Keaton MitchellRB33 snaps46%
Nelson AgholorWR29 snaps41%
Target Share30 targets
- Zay Flowers27%, 8 targets
- Isaiah Likely20%, 6 targets
- Odell Beckham17%, 5 targets
- Rashod Bateman17%, 5 targets
- Nelson Agholor7%, 2 targets
- Other13%, 4 targets
Carry Share35 carries
- Lamar Jackson31%, 11 carries
- Keaton Mitchell26%, 9 carries
- Gus Edwards23%, 8 carries
- Justice Hill14%, 5 carries
- Devin Duvernay3%, 1 carries
- Other3%, 1 carries
Los Angeles Chargers
Snap Share
Keenan AllenWR65 snaps98%
Austin EkelerRB53 snaps80%
Jalen GuytonWR53 snaps80%
Gerald EverettTE42 snaps64%
Alex EricksonWR34 snaps52%
Target Share41 targets
- Keenan Allen39%, 16 targets
- Austin Ekeler15%, 6 targets
- Jalen Guyton12%, 5 targets
- Gerald Everett10%, 4 targets
- Alex Erickson7%, 3 targets
- Other17%, 7 targets
Carry Share19 carries
- Austin Ekeler53%, 10 carries
- Justin Herbert21%, 4 carries
- Joshua Kelley16%, 3 carries
- Derius Davis11%, 2 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 65 | 98% | 16 | 39% | 0 | |
| 67 | 94% | 8 | 27% | 1 | |
| 53 | 80% | 6 | 15% | 10 | |
| 53 | 80% | 5 | 12% | 0 | |
| 57 | 80% | 5 | 17% | 0 | |
| 52 | 73% | 6 | 20% | 0 | |
| 42 | 64% | 4 | 10% | 0 | |
| 34 | 52% | 3 | 7% | 0 | |
| 33 | 46% | 2 | 7% | 9 | |
| 29 | 44% | 3 | 7% | 0 | |
| 28 | 42% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 29 | 41% | 2 | 7% | 0 | |
| 23 | 32% | 5 | 17% | 0 | |
| 20 | 28% | 1 | 3% | 5 | |
| 19 | 27% | 1 | 3% | 8 | |
| 19 | 27% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 13 | 20% | 2 | 5% | 3 | |
| 8 | 12% | 1 | 2% | 0 | |
| 4 | 6% | 1 | 2% | 2 | |
| 2 | 3% | 0 | 0% | 1 | |
| 2 | 3% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+9.2Zay Flowers23.2 PTS vs 14.0 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−6.9Jalen Guyton1.4 PTS vs 8.3 xFP
- Highest expected volume26.7 xFPKeenan Allen22.6 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keenan AllenLAC · WR | 22.6 | 26.7 | −4.1 | 98% | 39% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 16 | 39% |
| Justin HerbertLAC · QB | 14.4 | 21.0 | −6.6 | 100% | 44 att | — | 44 | 4 | 21% | 0 | 0% |
| Lamar JacksonBAL · QB | 15.0 | 20.2 | −5.2 | 100% | 32 att | — | 32 | 11 | 31% | 0 | 0% |
| Austin EkelerLAC · RB | 9.4 | 16.2 | −6.8 | 80% | 53% car | — | 0 | 10 | 53% | 6 | 15% |
| Zay FlowersBAL · WR | 23.2 | 14.0 | +9.2 | 94% | 27% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 8 | 27% |
| Isaiah LikelyBAL · TE | 8.0 | 10.0 | −2.0 | 73% | 20% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 20% |
| Keaton MitchellBAL · RB | 10.9 | 8.9 | +2.0 | 46% | 26% car | — | 0 | 9 | 26% | 2 | 7% |
| Jalen GuytonLAC · WR | 1.4 | 8.3 | −6.9 | 80% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 12% |
| Odell Beckham Jr.BAL · WR | 6.4 | 8.3 | −1.9 | 32% | 17% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 17% |
| Rashod BatemanBAL · WR | 4.1 | 8.3 | −4.2 | 80% | 17% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 17% |
| Gerald EverettLAC · TE | 14.3 | 6.7 | +7.6 | 64% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 10% |
| Gus EdwardsBAL · RB | 4.7 | 6.6 | −1.9 | 27% | 23% car | — | 0 | 8 | 23% | 1 | 3% |
| Joshua KelleyLAC · RB | 3.4 | 5.2 | −1.8 | 20% | 16% car | — | 0 | 3 | 16% | 2 | 5% |
| Alex EricksonLAC · WR | 2.7 | 5.0 | −2.3 | 52% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 7% |
| Quentin JohnstonLAC · WR | 1.7 | 5.0 | −3.3 | 44% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 7% |
| Justice HillBAL · RB | 3.1 | 4.7 | −1.6 | 28% | 14% car | — | 0 | 5 | 14% | 1 | 3% |
| Nelson AgholorBAL · WR | 3.1 | 3.3 | −0.2 | 41% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Derius DavisLAC · WR | 1.1 | 2.9 | −1.8 | 6% | 11% car | — | 0 | 2 | 11% | 1 | 2% |
| Stone SmarttLAC · TE | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 12% | 2% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 2% |
| Devin DuvernayBAL · WR | 0.0 | 0.6 | −0.6 | 3% | 3% car | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Ravens 30 targets and 35 carries; Chargers 41 targets and 19 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2023 season: 1.67 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.61 per carry and 0.42 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Lamar Jackson Unlucky
BAL · QB · 15.0 pts on 20.2 expected
18 of 32 passing for 177 yards, 1 touchdown; 11 carries for 39 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 20.2 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 33.9, 12.0, 11.5, 15.0, 24.0, 15.0
W7W8W9W10W11W12
Justin Herbert Unlucky
LAC · QB · 14.4 pts on 21.0 expected
29 of 44 passing for 217 yards, 1 touchdown, 1 interception; 4 carries for 47 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 21.0 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 12.9, 24.0, 7.1, 29.4, 25.7, 14.4
W7W8W9W10W11W12
Zay Flowers Ran hot
BAL · WR · 23.2 pts on 14.0 expected
8 targets (27% of the team's), 5 catches for 25 yards and 1 touchdown; 1 carry (3% of the team's) for 37 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 14.0 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 11.5, 6.9, 2.1, 12.3, 8.0, 23.2
W7W8W9W10W11W12
Best fantasy game of the season.
Isaiah Likely
BAL · TE · 8.0 pts on 10.0 expected
6 targets (20% of the team's), 4 catches for 40 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 10.0 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 0.0, 2.0, 8.2, 1.5, 0.0, 8.0
W7W8W9W10W11W12
Season high in targets (6).
Keenan Allen Volume, no payoff
LAC · WR · 22.6 pts on 26.7 expected
16 targets (39% of the team's), 14 catches for 106 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 26.7 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 9.5, 14.9, 15.7, 40.5, 27.6, 22.6
W7W8W9W10W11W12
Austin Ekeler Unlucky
LAC · RB · 9.4 pts on 16.2 expected
6 targets (15% of the team's), 5 catches for 32 yards; 10 carries (53% of the team's) for 32 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 16.2 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 5.6, 23.3, 21.0, 21.5, 7.0, 9.4
W7W8W9W10W11W12
Jalen Guyton Unlucky
LAC · WR · 1.4 pts on 8.3 expected
5 targets (12% of the team's), 1 catch for 4 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 8.3 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Gerald Everett Ran hot
LAC · TE · 14.3 pts on 6.7 expected
4 targets (10% of the team's), 4 catches for 43 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 6.7 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 2.9, 10.8, 11.6, 3.8, 0.0, 14.3
W4W6W7W9W10W12
Best fantasy game of the season.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Baltimore Ravens
- ▲Stock up: Keaton Mitchell led the backfield with 46% of the snaps after trailing Gus Edwards before this game.
- ▲Stock up: Isaiah Likely played 73% of the snaps, up from a 31% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Rashod Bateman played 80% of the snaps, up from a 57% season average.
Los Angeles Chargers
- ▲Stock up: Austin Ekeler played 80% of the snaps, up from a 65% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Joshua Kelley played 20% of the snaps, down from a 44% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Alex Erickson played 52% of the snaps, down from a 78% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2023 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Ravens D | Chargers D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 13.2 | 19.0 |
| RBs | 20.2 | 23.2 |
| WRs | 29.7 | 37.3 |
| TEs | 10.1 | 11.7 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Los Angeles opened at 50% win probability and fell below 2% in the fourth quarter.
Chargers win probability
Key Swings
- +9Dicker 39-yd FG50% → 59%Q1 9:03
- −25Jackson → Flowers, 3-yd TD61% → 36%Q2 10:41
- −10Tucker 42-yd FG34% → 24%Q2 1:12
- −9Tucker 48-yd FG21% → 13%Q3 10:53
- +25Herbert → Everett, 3-yd TD2% → 28%Q4 8:32
Swing in Chargers win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Baltimore Ravens | Measure | Los Angeles Chargers |
|---|---|---|
| 69 | Plays | 66 |
| 49% | Pass rate | 71% |
| 4.8 | Yds / dropback | 4.1 |
| 5.6 | Yds / carry | 4.5 |
| 4/13 | Third downs | 7/15 |
Efficiency edge Baltimore ran 3 more plays and gained 0.7 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- BAL Flowers 27% · Likely 20% · Beckham 17%
- LAC Allen 39% · Ekeler 15% · Guyton 12%
Possession Results
| Result | BAL | LAC |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 2 | 1 |
| Field goals | 2 | 1 |
| Punts | 3 | 3 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 4 |
| Turnovers on downs | 2 | 2 |
| Missed field goals | 1 | 0 |
BAL turnover edge: +4
- The Chargers opened the scoring on their first possession, a 12-play, 54-yard drive that ended in a field goal.
- The Ravens drained the clock with two second-half drives of four to six minutes.
All 22 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAC | Q1 15:00 | 12 | 54 | 5:57 | Field goal |
| BAL | Q1 9:03 | 7 | 27 | 3:50 | Punt |
| LAC | Q1 5:13 | 6 | 10 | 3:11 | Punt |
| BAL | Q1 2:02 | 12 | 78 | 6:21 | Touchdown |
| LAC | Q2 10:41 | 3 | -1 | 1:43 | Punt |
| BAL | Q2 8:58 | 9 | 35 | 4:45 | Downs |
| LAC | Q2 4:13 | 2 | 7 | 0:40 | Fumble |
| BAL | Q2 3:33 | 5 | 10 | 2:21 | Field goal |
| LAC | Q2 1:12 | 3 | 22 | 0:46 | Fumble |
| BAL | Q2 0:26 | 4 | -4 | 0:23 | Downs |
| LAC | Q2 0:03 | 1 | 0 | 0:03 | Interception |
| BAL | Q3 15:00 | 9 | 45 | 4:07 | Field goal |
| LAC | Q3 10:53 | 3 | 9 | 0:56 | Punt |
| BAL | Q3 9:57 | 9 | 43 | 3:42 | Punt |
| LAC | Q3 6:15 | 19 | 61 | 8:44 | Fumble |
| BAL | Q4 12:31 | 3 | 5 | 1:08 | Punt |
| LAC | Q4 11:23 | 7 | 60 | 2:51 | Touchdown |
| BAL | Q4 8:32 | 9 | 49 | 5:35 | Missed FG |
| LAC | Q4 2:57 | 6 | 10 | 1:03 | Downs |
| BAL | Q4 1:54 | 3 | 44 | 0:18 | Touchdown |
| LAC | Q4 1:36 | 5 | 12 | 0:43 | Downs |
| BAL | Q4 0:53 | 2 | -2 | 0:53 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Ravens vs Chargers Head-to-Head
The Ravens and Chargers first met in 1997 and have played 16 times since.
- All-time series
- 10–6Ravens lead, 16 meetings since 1997
- Postseason
- 1–0Chargers won in 2018
- Largest Ravens win
- 34–62021
- Largest Chargers win
- 34–142011
Since 2021
3–0 Ravens lead
3 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- R
- R
- R
Oldest to newest. R = Ravens win, C = Chargers win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 10 Chargers at Ravens Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2024 Wk 12 Ravens at Chargers, 2024 Wk 12 recap BAL 30 LAC 23 BAL W
- 2023 Wk 12 Ravens at Chargers BAL 20 LAC 10 BAL W
- 2021 Wk 6 Chargers at Ravens, 2021 Wk 6 recap BAL 34 LAC 6 BAL W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2023 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Ravens | Stat | Chargers |
|---|---|---|
| 13-4 | Record | 5-12 |
| 28.4 | Points per game | 20.4 |
| 370.4 | Yards per game | 329.4 |
| 5.9 | Yards per play | 5.1 |
| 16.5 | Points allowed per game | 23.4 |
| 301.4 | Yards allowed per game | 362.9 |
Ravens vs Chargers Fantasy Outlook for 2026
One meeting is left on the 2026 schedule: Week 10 in Baltimore. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Ravens or Chargers player start in Week 10? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Ravens and Chargers players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Ravens and Chargers defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere this matchup falls in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2023 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Ravens vs Chargers Game FAQ
Who won the 2023 Ravens vs Chargers Week 12 game?
The Baltimore Ravens beat the Los Angeles Chargers 20–10 in Week 12 of the 2023 season. The game was played at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, CA, on November 26, 2023. See the Ravens' 2023 schedule.
What was the final score of Ravens vs Chargers?
The final score was Ravens 20, Chargers 10. The Ravens led 10–3 at halftime, and the second half went Ravens 10, Chargers 7.
What happened in the Ravens vs Chargers game?
Baltimore led 10–3 at halftime and outscored Los Angeles 10–7 after the break to win 20–10. The Ravens finished with a 361–279 edge in total offense and averaged 5.2 yards per play. Zay Flowers led all players with 5 catches for 25 yards and a touchdown, plus a carry for 37 rushing yards and a touchdown. The Chargers committed 4 turnovers, the Ravens none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Ravens vs Chargers?
Zay Flowers led the game with 23.2 PPR fantasy points, the WR6 of Week 12, on 5 catches for 25 yards and a touchdown, plus a carry for 37 rushing yards and a touchdown. Keenan Allen was next with 22.6 (WR7). See Zay Flowers's 2023 game log.
Who led Ravens vs Chargers in passing, rushing and receiving?
Justin Herbert (LAC) led all passers with 29 of 44 for 217 yards, a touchdown and an interception. Keaton Mitchell (BAL) led in rushing with 9 carries for 64 yards. Keenan Allen (LAC) led in receiving with 14 catches for 106 yards.
How many fantasy points did Zay Flowers score against the Chargers?
Zay Flowers scored 23.2 points in PPR leagues, 20.7 in half-PPR and 18.2 in standard scoring against the Chargers in Week 12 of the 2023 season, on 5 catches for 25 yards and a touchdown, plus a carry for 37 rushing yards and a touchdown. He drew 27% of his team's targets.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Ravens vs Chargers?
Zay Flowers outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 23.2 PPR points on 14.0 xFP (+9.2). Jalen Guyton fell furthest short, with 1.4 points on 8.3 xFP (−6.9). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Ravens vs Chargers?
Keenan Allen had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 26.7 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 22.6. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Ravens beat the Chargers?
The Ravens beat the Chargers 20–10 because they averaged 5.2 yards per play to 4.2, won the turnover battle 4–0, and outgained them 361–279.
Which team won the turnover battle in Ravens vs Chargers?
The Ravens won the turnover battle 4–0: the Chargers gave the ball away 4 times and the Ravens not at all. The Ravens won the game.
What was the turning point of Ravens vs Chargers?
Justin Herbert's 3-yard touchdown pass to Gerald Everett with 8:32 left in the fourth quarter was the biggest swing of the game, moving the Chargers' win probability from 2% to 28%.
What is the all-time Ravens vs Chargers record?
The Ravens lead the all-time series 10–6 across 16 meetings since 1997, including a 0–1 record in the postseason.
When did the Ravens and Chargers last play before this game?
Before Week 12 of 2023, they last met in the 2021 season on October 17, 2021, when the Ravens beat the Chargers 34–6.
Have the Ravens and Chargers met in the playoffs?
Yes, 1 time, most recently in the 2018 playoffs. The Ravens are 0–1 against the Chargers in the postseason.
What is the Ravens vs Chargers record since 2021?
The Ravens lead 3–0 across 3 meetings since the 2021 season, including this game.
