Final2023 Week 7
Soldier Field, Chicago, IL|
Las Vegas Raiders vs Chicago Bears, Week 7 2023
Las Vegas Raiders
Away
12
Chicago Bears
HomeWon
30
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raiders | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 12 |
| Bears | 7 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 30 |
LV 12 · CHI 30 Final
Passing leader
CHI · QB
12.9PPR pts
21/29, 162 YDS, 1 TD
Top fantasy scorer
D'Onta Foreman
CHI · RB
33.0PPR pts
16 ATT, 89 YDS, 2 TD, 3 REC, 31 REC YDS, 1 REC TD
Raiders leader
LV · WR
18.0PPR pts
7 REC, 50 YDS, 1 TD
Defensive playmaker
Jaylon Johnson
CHI
2 INT, 1 TD, 3 TKL
Bears 30, Raiders 12: Chicago leads from start to finish
Chicago led 14–3 at halftime and outscored Las Vegas 16–9 after the break to win 30–12. The Bears finished with a 323–235 edge in total offense and averaged 4.7 yards per play.
The gap showed up everywhere. The Raiders went 2-for-9 on third down and committed three turnovers, while the Bears kept the ball for 34:06 and finished without a giveaway.
Key advantages
- +0.8 yards/play CHI 4.7 · LV 3.9
- +3 turnover margin CHI 0 turnovers
- +88 total yards CHI 323 · LV 235
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Raider or Bear on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Bears Won
Chicago won the efficiency, turnover, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Raiders | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 3.9 | Yards per play | 4.7 |
| 3 | Turnovers | 0 |
| 235 | Total yards | 323 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 60 | Plays | 69 |
| 22% | Third-down conversion | 62% |
| 25:54 | Time of possession | 34:06 |
Scoring Summary
The Bears scored four touchdowns and one field goal; the Raiders scored one touchdown and two field goals.
| Time | Team | Play | LV | CHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 3:45 | CHI | D'Onta Foreman 2-yard TD run Takes leadCairo Santos XP | 0 | 7 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 7:31 | CHI | D'Onta Foreman 3-yard TD run Extends leadCairo Santos XP | 0 | 14 |
| 1:47 | LV | Daniel Carlson 40-yard FG | 3 | 14 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 4:04 | CHI | Tyson Bagent → D'Onta Foreman, 5-yard TD Extends leadCairo Santos XP | 3 | 21 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 12:20 | LV | Daniel Carlson 25-yard FG | 6 | 21 |
| 5:46 | CHI | Cairo Santos 54-yard FG Extends lead | 6 | 24 |
| 5:36 | CHI | Jaylon Johnson 39-yard interception return TD Extends leadXP missed | 6 | 30 |
| 1:10 | LV | Aidan O'Connell → Jakobi Meyers, 9-yard TD2-pt try failed | 12 | 30 |
Fantasy Points: Raiders vs Bears, Week 7 2023
Fantasy leaders
- D'Onta ForemanCHI · RB33.0 PTSRB1
- Jakobi MeyersLV · WR18.0 PTSWR11
- DJ MooreCHI · WR13.4 PTSWR21
- Tyson BagentCHI · QB12.9 PTSQB20
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.9 | QB20 | 21/29 | 162 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 24 | 0 | 97.2 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.2 | QB27 | 17/32 | 129 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | 37.1 | ||
| 6.0 | QB26 | 10/13 | 75 | 1 | 1 | — | — | — | 83.8 | ||
| -0.4 | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | -4 | 0 | — |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33.0 | RB1 | RB | 16 | 89 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 31 | 1 | ||
| 18.0 | WR11 | WR | — | — | — | 13 | 7 | 50 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 13.4 | WR21 | WR | — | — | — | 9 | 8 | 54 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 12.7 | WR24 | WR | — | — | — | 12 | 7 | 57 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.4 | WR51 | WR | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 32 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.4 | RB33 | RB | 14 | 48 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0 | ||
| 5.8 | RB37 | RB | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 26 | 0 | ||
| 5.3 | WR61 | WR | 2 | 14 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 19 | 0 | ||
| 5.1 | RB41 | RB | 11 | 35 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.8 | WR67 | WR | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 16 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.8 | TE26 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.4 | WR70 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 14 | 0 | ||
| 3.3 | TE28 | TE | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 13 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.6 | TE29 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | ||
| 1.4 | TE39 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | ||
| 1.0 | WR98 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | RB | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Las Vegas Raiders
Snap Share
Jakobi MeyersWR61 snaps94%
Davante AdamsWR49 snaps75%
Michael MayerTE46 snaps71%
Josh JacobsRB43 snaps66%
Tre TuckerWR32 snaps49%
Target Share45 targets
- Jakobi Meyers29%, 13 targets
- Davante Adams27%, 12 targets
- Josh Jacobs9%, 4 targets
- Michael Mayer9%, 4 targets
- Hunter Renfrow7%, 3 targets
- Other20%, 9 targets
Carry Share14 carries
- Josh Jacobs79%, 11 carries
- Zamir White14%, 2 carries
- Tre Tucker7%, 1 carries
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
DJ MooreWR63 snaps89%
Cole KmetTE63 snaps89%
Darnell MooneyWR48 snaps68%
Tyler ScottWR40 snaps56%
Darrynton EvansRB34 snaps48%
Target Share28 targets
- DJ Moore32%, 9 targets
- D'Onta Foreman18%, 5 targets
- Darnell Mooney18%, 5 targets
- Darrynton Evans11%, 3 targets
- Tyler Scott11%, 3 targets
- Other11%, 3 targets
Carry Share38 carries
- D'Onta Foreman42%, 16 carries
- Darrynton Evans37%, 14 carries
- Tyson Bagent8%, 3 carries
- Nathan Peterman5%, 2 carries
- Tyler Scott5%, 2 carries
- Other3%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 61 | 94% | 13 | 29% | 0 | |
| 63 | 89% | 9 | 32% | 0 | |
| 63 | 89% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 49 | 75% | 12 | 27% | 0 | |
| 46 | 71% | 4 | 9% | 0 | |
| 48 | 68% | 5 | 18% | 1 | |
| 43 | 66% | 4 | 9% | 11 | |
| 40 | 56% | 3 | 11% | 2 | |
| 32 | 49% | 3 | 7% | 1 | |
| 34 | 48% | 3 | 11% | 14 | |
| 33 | 46% | 5 | 18% | 16 | |
| 24 | 37% | 3 | 7% | 0 | |
| 22 | 34% | 2 | 4% | 0 | |
| 23 | 32% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 22 | 31% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 14 | 22% | 3 | 7% | 2 | |
| 10 | 15% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 8 | 11% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 6 | 8% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 5 | 8% | 1 | 2% | 0 | |
| 3 | 5% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 3 | 4% | 1 | 4% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+14.8D'Onta Foreman33.0 PTS vs 18.2 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−10.3Brian Hoyer3.2 PTS vs 13.5 xFP
- Highest expected volume21.7 xFPJakobi Meyers18.0 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jakobi MeyersLV · WR | 18.0 | 21.7 | −3.7 | 94% | 29% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 13 | 29% |
| Davante AdamsLV · WR | 12.7 | 20.0 | −7.3 | 75% | 27% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 12 | 27% |
| D'Onta ForemanCHI · RB | 33.0 | 18.2 | +14.8 | 46% | 42% car | — | 0 | 16 | 42% | 5 | 17% |
| DJ MooreCHI · WR | 13.4 | 15.0 | −1.6 | 89% | 31% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 9 | 31% |
| Tyson BagentCHI · QB | 12.9 | 14.0 | −1.1 | 96% | 29 att | — | 29 | 3 | 8% | 0 | 0% |
| Darrynton EvansCHI · RB | 6.4 | 13.6 | −7.2 | 48% | 37% car | — | 0 | 14 | 37% | 3 | 10% |
| Brian HoyerLV · QB | 3.2 | 13.5 | −10.3 | 78% | 32 att | — | 32 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Josh JacobsLV · RB | 5.1 | 13.4 | −8.3 | 66% | 79% car | — | 0 | 11 | 79% | 4 | 9% |
| Darnell MooneyCHI · WR | 7.4 | 9.0 | −1.6 | 68% | 17% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 5 | 17% |
| Michael MayerLV · TE | 3.3 | 6.7 | −3.4 | 71% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 9% |
| Tyler ScottCHI · WR | 5.3 | 6.2 | −0.9 | 56% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 2 | 5% | 3 | 10% |
| Zamir WhiteLV · RB | 5.8 | 6.2 | −0.4 | 22% | 14% car | — | 0 | 2 | 14% | 3 | 7% |
| Tre TuckerLV · WR | 3.8 | 5.6 | −1.8 | 49% | 7% car | — | 0 | 1 | 7% | 3 | 7% |
| Aidan O'ConnellLV · QB | 6.0 | 5.5 | +0.5 | 22% | 13 att | — | 13 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Hunter RenfrowLV · WR | 3.4 | 5.0 | −1.6 | 37% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 7% |
| Austin HooperLV · TE | 3.8 | 3.3 | +0.5 | 34% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 4% |
| Jesper HorstedLV · TE | 1.4 | 1.7 | −0.3 | 8% | 2% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 2% |
| Khari BlasingameCHI · RB | 1.4 | 1.7 | −0.3 | — | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Marcedes LewisCHI · TE | 2.6 | 1.7 | +0.9 | 32% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Travis HomerCHI · RB | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 4% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Velus Jones Jr.CHI · WR | 1.0 | 1.7 | −0.7 | 11% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Nathan PetermanCHI · QB | -0.4 | 1.2 | −1.6 | 4% | 0 att | — | 0 | 2 | 5% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Raiders 45 targets and 14 carries; Bears 29 targets and 38 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2023 season: 1.67 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.61 per carry and 0.42 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Brian Hoyer Unlucky
LV · QB · 3.2 pts on 13.5 expected
17 of 32 passing for 129 yards, 2 interceptions.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 13.5 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Tyson Bagent
CHI · QB · 12.9 pts on 14.0 expected
21 of 29 passing for 162 yards, 1 touchdown; 3 carries for 24 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 14.0 expected.
Start/Sit: Tyson Bagent →Jakobi Meyers
LV · WR · 18.0 pts on 21.7 expected
13 targets (29% of the team's), 7 catches for 50 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 21.7 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 29.1, 15.5, 5.3, 20.5, 17.1, 18.0
W1W3W4W5W6W7
Season high in targets (13). A touchdown in 4 of the last 6 games.
Davante Adams Unlucky
LV · WR · 12.7 pts on 20.0 expected
12 targets (27% of the team's), 7 catches for 57 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 20.0 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 20.4, 42.2, 15.5, 8.5, 4.9, 12.7
W2W3W4W5W6W7
D'Onta Foreman Ran hot
CHI · RB · 33.0 pts on 18.2 expected
5 targets (17% of the team's), 3 catches for 31 yards and 1 touchdown; 16 carries (42% of the team's) for 89 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 18.2 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Trend: Season high in carries (16).
DJ Moore Volume, no payoff
CHI · WR · 13.4 pts on 15.0 expected
9 targets (31% of the team's), 8 catches for 54 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 15.0 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 16.4, 13.1, 27.1, 49.0, 11.1, 13.4
W2W3W4W5W6W7
Darrynton Evans Unlucky
CHI · RB · 6.4 pts on 13.6 expected
3 targets (10% of the team's), 1 catch for 6 yards; 14 carries (37% of the team's) for 48 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 13.6 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Trend: Season high in carries (14).
Josh Jacobs Volume, no payoff
LV · RB · 5.1 pts on 13.4 expected
4 targets (9% of the team's), 1 catch for 6 yards; 11 carries (79% of the team's) for 35 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 13.4 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 9.9, 11.0, 27.9, 19.9, 11.3, 5.1
W2W3W4W5W6W7
Lowest-scoring game of the season.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Las Vegas Raiders
- ▲Stock up: Michael Mayer played 71% of the snaps, up from a 56% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Tre Tucker played 49% of the snaps, up from a 21% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Davante Adams played 75% of the snaps, down from a 92% season average.
Chicago Bears
- ▲Stock up: Darrynton Evans led the backfield with 48% of the snaps after trailing D'Onta Foreman before this game.
- ▲Stock up: Tyler Scott played 56% of the snaps, up from a 27% season average.
- ▼Stock down: D'Onta Foreman lost the backfield lead: 46% of the snaps to Darrynton Evans's 48%.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2023 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Raiders D | Bears D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 15.4 | 16.9 |
| RBs | 23.5 | 23.8 |
| WRs | 30.8 | 31.9 |
| TEs | 11.2 | 13.7 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Chicago opened at 50% win probability and passed 98% in the third quarter on the way to the win.
Bears win probability
Key Swings
- +22Foreman 2-yd TD run50% → 72%Q1 3:45
- +16Foreman 3-yd TD run74% → 91%Q2 7:31
- −5Carlson 40-yd FG92% → 87%Q2 1:47
- +7Bagent → Foreman, 5-yd TD93% → 99%Q3 4:04
Swing in Bears win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Las Vegas Raiders | Measure | Chicago Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 60 | Plays | 69 |
| 77% | Pass rate | 45% |
| 4.3 | Yds / dropback | 4.8 |
| 2.8 | Yds / carry | 4.6 |
| 2/9 | Third downs | 8/13 |
Efficiency edge Chicago ran 9 more plays and gained 0.5 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- LV Meyers 29% · Adams 27% · Jacobs 9%
- CHI Moore 31% · Foreman 17% · Mooney 17%
Possession Results
| Result | LV | CHI |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 1 | 3 |
| Field goals | 2 | 1 |
| Punts | 2 | 3 |
| Turnovers | 3 | 0 |
| Turnovers on downs | 0 | 1 |
| Missed field goals | 1 | 0 |
CHI turnover edge: +3
- The Bears opened the scoring on their second possession, a 12-play, 69-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
- The Bears drained the clock with two second-half drives of six to nine minutes.
All 18 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 3 | 1:33 | Punt |
| LV | Q1 13:27 | 7 | 34 | 3:20 | Missed FG |
| CHI | Q1 10:07 | 12 | 69 | 6:22 | Touchdown |
| LV | Q1 3:45 | 7 | 28 | 3:04 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 0:41 | 8 | 26 | 4:36 | Punt |
| LV | Q2 11:05 | 2 | 4 | 0:46 | Interception |
| CHI | Q2 10:19 | 6 | 34 | 2:48 | Touchdown |
| LV | Q2 7:31 | 13 | 54 | 5:44 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q2 1:47 | 9 | 20 | 1:47 | Downs |
| LV | Q3 15:00 | 5 | 21 | 2:40 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 12:20 | 15 | 88 | 8:16 | Touchdown |
| LV | Q3 4:04 | 15 | 69 | 6:44 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q4 12:20 | 12 | 37 | 6:34 | Field goal |
| LV | Q4 5:46 | 1 | 0 | 0:10 | Interception |
| LV | Q4 5:36 | 5 | 15 | 1:04 | Interception |
| CHI | Q4 4:32 | 3 | 5 | 1:00 | Punt |
| LV | Q4 3:32 | 8 | 60 | 2:22 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q4 1:10 | 2 | -4 | 1:10 | End of game |
About these numbers
The Bears' interception touchdown is counted as a Raiders interception, not as a Bears possession. Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Raiders vs Bears Head-to-Head
The Raiders and Bears first met in 1972 and have played 18 times since.
- All-time series
- 10–8Bears lead, 18 meetings since 1972
- Postseason
- 0No playoff meetings
- Largest Raiders win
- 24–101990
- Largest Bears win
- 30–122023
Since 2021
3–0 Bears lead
3 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- B
- B
- B
Oldest to newest. B = Bears win, R = Raiders win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wk 4 Bears at Raiders, 2025 Wk 4 recap CHI 25 LV 24 CHI W
- 2023 Wk 7 Raiders at Bears CHI 30 LV 12 CHI W
- 2021 Wk 5 Bears at Raiders, 2021 Wk 5 recap CHI 20 LV 9 CHI W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2023 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Raiders | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 8-9 | Record | 7-10 |
| 19.5 | Points per game | 21.2 |
| 289.5 | Yards per game | 323.2 |
| 4.9 | Yards per play | 5.0 |
| 19.5 | Points allowed per game | 22.3 |
| 330.9 | Yards allowed per game | 324.2 |
Raiders and Bears in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Raider or a Bear, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Raiders or Bears player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Raiders and Bears players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Raiders and Bears defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2023 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Raiders vs Bears Game FAQ
Who won the 2023 Raiders vs Bears Week 7 game?
The Chicago Bears beat the Las Vegas Raiders 30–12 in Week 7 of the 2023 season. The game was played at Soldier Field in Chicago, IL, on October 22, 2023. See the Bears' 2023 schedule.
What was the final score of Raiders vs Bears?
The final score was Bears 30, Raiders 12. The Bears led 14–3 at halftime, and the second half went Raiders 9, Bears 16.
What happened in the Raiders vs Bears game?
Chicago led 14–3 at halftime and outscored Las Vegas 16–9 after the break to win 30–12. The Bears finished with a 323–235 edge in total offense and averaged 4.7 yards per play. D'Onta Foreman led all players with 3 catches for 31 yards and a touchdown, plus 16 carries for 89 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. The Raiders committed 3 turnovers, the Bears none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Raiders vs Bears?
D'Onta Foreman led the game with 33.0 PPR fantasy points, the RB1 of Week 7, on 3 catches for 31 yards and a touchdown, plus 16 carries for 89 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. Jakobi Meyers was next with 18.0 (WR11).
Who led Raiders vs Bears in passing, rushing and receiving?
Tyson Bagent (CHI) led all passers with 21 of 29 for 162 yards and a touchdown. D'Onta Foreman (CHI) led in rushing with 16 carries for 89 yards and 2 touchdowns. Davante Adams (LV) led in receiving with 7 catches for 57 yards.
How many fantasy points did D'Onta Foreman score against the Raiders?
D'Onta Foreman scored 33.0 points in PPR leagues, 31.5 in half-PPR and 30.0 in standard scoring against the Raiders in Week 7 of the 2023 season, on 3 catches for 31 yards and a touchdown, plus 16 carries for 89 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. He handled 42% of his team's carries.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Raiders vs Bears?
D'Onta Foreman outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 33.0 PPR points on 18.2 xFP (+14.8). Brian Hoyer fell furthest short, with 3.2 points on 13.5 xFP (−10.3). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Raiders vs Bears?
Jakobi Meyers had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 21.7 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 18.0. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Bears beat the Raiders?
The Bears beat the Raiders 30–12 because they averaged 4.7 yards per play to 3.9, won the turnover battle 3–0, and outgained them 323–235.
Which team won the turnover battle in Raiders vs Bears?
The Bears won the turnover battle 3–0: the Raiders gave the ball away 3 times and the Bears not at all. The Bears won the game.
What is the all-time Raiders vs Bears record?
The Bears lead the all-time series 10–8 across 18 meetings since 1972.
When did the Raiders and Bears last play before this game?
Before Week 7 of 2023, they last met in the 2021 season on October 10, 2021, when the Bears beat the Raiders 20–9.
What is the Raiders vs Bears record since 2021?
The Bears lead 3–0 across 3 meetings since the 2021 season, including this game.
