Final2023 Week 8
SoFi Stadium, Inglewood, CA|
Chicago Bears vs Los Angeles Chargers, Week 8 2023
Chicago Bears
Away
13
Los Angeles Chargers
HomeWon
30
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bears | 0 | 7 | 0 | 6 | 13 |
| Chargers | 14 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 30 |
CHI 13 · LAC 30 Final
Passing leader
LAC · QB
24.0PPR pts
31/40, 298 YDS, 3 TD
Top fantasy scorer
LAC · RB
23.3PPR pts
15 ATT, 29 YDS, 7 REC, 94 REC YDS, 1 REC TD
Bears leader
CHI · TE
17.9PPR pts
10 REC, 79 YDS
Defensive playmaker
Derwin James Jr.
LAC
1 INT, 5 TKL
Chargers 30, Bears 13: Los Angeles leads from start to finish
Los Angeles led 24–7 at halftime to win 30–13. The Chargers finished with a 352–295 edge in total offense and averaged 5.4 yards per play.
The gap showed up everywhere. The Bears went 6-for-14 on third down and committed two turnovers.
Key advantages
- +0.7 yards/play LAC 5.4 · CHI 4.7
- +1 turnover margin LAC 1 · CHI 2 turnovers
- +57 total yards LAC 352 · CHI 295
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Bear or Charger on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Chargers Won
Los Angeles won the efficiency, turnover, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Bears | Stat | Chargers |
|---|---|---|
| 4.7 | Yards per play | 5.4 |
| 2 | Turnovers | 1 |
| 295 | Total yards | 352 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 63 | Plays | 65 |
| 43% | Third-down conversion | 54% |
| 28:32 | Time of possession | 31:28 |
Scoring Summary
The Chargers scored three touchdowns and three field goals; the Bears scored two touchdowns.
| Time | Team | Play | CHI | LAC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 7:08 | LAC | Justin Herbert → Austin Ekeler, 39-yard TD Takes leadCameron Dicker XP | 0 | 7 |
| 0:43 | LAC | Justin Herbert → Simi Fehoko, 9-yard TD Extends leadCameron Dicker XP | 0 | 14 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 8:50 | LAC | Cameron Dicker 43-yard FG Extends lead | 0 | 17 |
| 1:47 | CHI | Darrynton Evans 11-yard TD runCairo Santos XP | 7 | 17 |
| 0:04 | LAC | Justin Herbert → Donald Parham Jr., 11-yard TD Extends leadCameron Dicker XP | 7 | 24 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 8:51 | LAC | Cameron Dicker 53-yard FG Extends lead | 7 | 27 |
| 3:00 | LAC | Cameron Dicker 46-yard FG Extends lead | 7 | 30 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 2:12 | CHI | Tyson Bagent 1-yard TD run2-pt try failed | 13 | 30 |
Fantasy Points: Bears vs Chargers, Week 8 2023
Fantasy leaders
- Justin HerbertLAC · QB24.0 PTSQB8
- Austin EkelerLAC · RB23.3 PTSRB6
- Cole KmetCHI · TE17.9 PTSTE6
- Keenan AllenLAC · WR14.9 PTSWR26
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.0 | QB8 | 31/40 | 298 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 122.7 | Start/Sit → | |
| 13.2 | QB22 | 25/37 | 232 | 0 | 2 | 4 | -1 | 1 | 62.0 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.3 | RB6 | RB | 15 | 29 | 0 | 8 | 7 | 94 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 17.9 | TE6 | TE | — | — | — | 10 | 10 | 79 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 14.9 | WR26 | WR | — | — | — | 10 | 8 | 69 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 14.3 | TE12 | TE | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 43 | 1 | ||
| 13.0 | RB17 | RB | 4 | 18 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 22 | 0 | ||
| 10.0 | WR47 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 5 | 50 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.5 | WR51 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 55 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.9 | WR57 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 9 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.1 | RB44 | RB | 6 | 21 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 10 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.4 | WR77 | WR | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 41 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.4 | WR78 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 24 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.6 | RB53 | RB | 9 | 34 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | ||
| 2.4 | WR97 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.1 | RB67 | RB | 6 | 21 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 2.1 | WR101 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 11 | 0 | ||
| 1.8 | RB70 | RB | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | ||
| 1.8 | TE41 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.4 | WR108 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | ||
| -0.2 | — | WR | 1 | -2 | 0 | — | — | — | — |
Fantasy Usage
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
DJ MooreWR58 snaps88%
Darnell MooneyWR56 snaps85%
Cole KmetTE55 snaps83%
Tyler ScottWR38 snaps58%
Roschon JohnsonRB24 snaps36%
Target Share36 targets
- Cole Kmet28%, 10 targets
- DJ Moore17%, 6 targets
- Darrynton Evans11%, 4 targets
- Darnell Mooney11%, 4 targets
- Roschon Johnson11%, 4 targets
- Other22%, 8 targets
Carry Share25 carries
- D'Onta Foreman36%, 9 carries
- Roschon Johnson24%, 6 carries
- Darrynton Evans16%, 4 carries
- Tyson Bagent16%, 4 carries
- Trent Taylor4%, 1 carries
- Other4%, 1 carries
Los Angeles Chargers
Snap Share
Keenan AllenWR55 snaps80%
Quentin JohnstonWR48 snaps70%
Joshua PalmerWR47 snaps68%
Austin EkelerRB46 snaps67%
Donald ParhamTE43 snaps62%
Target Share38 targets
- Keenan Allen26%, 10 targets
- Austin Ekeler21%, 8 targets
- Quentin Johnston16%, 6 targets
- Donald Parham13%, 5 targets
- Joshua Palmer11%, 4 targets
- Other13%, 5 targets
Carry Share25 carries
- Austin Ekeler60%, 15 carries
- Joshua Kelley24%, 6 carries
- Isaiah Spiller12%, 3 carries
- Justin Herbert4%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58 | 88% | 6 | 17% | 0 | |
| 56 | 85% | 4 | 11% | 1 | |
| 55 | 83% | 10 | 28% | 0 | |
| 55 | 80% | 10 | 26% | 0 | |
| 48 | 70% | 6 | 16% | 0 | |
| 47 | 68% | 4 | 11% | 0 | |
| 46 | 67% | 8 | 21% | 15 | |
| 43 | 62% | 5 | 13% | 0 | |
| 38 | 58% | 3 | 8% | 0 | |
| 39 | 57% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 24 | 36% | 4 | 11% | 6 | |
| 21 | 32% | 2 | 6% | 9 | |
| 18 | 27% | 4 | 11% | 4 | |
| 17 | 26% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 16 | 23% | 2 | 5% | 0 | |
| 15 | 23% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 15 | 22% | 0 | 0% | 6 | |
| 15 | 22% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 10 | 15% | 0 | 0% | 1 | |
| 9 | 13% | 2 | 5% | 0 | |
| 8 | 12% | 1 | 3% | 3 | |
| 3 | 5% | 2 | 6% | 0 | |
| 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+6.6Justin Herbert24.0 PTS vs 17.4 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−4.8Tyson Bagent13.2 PTS vs 18.0 xFP
- Highest expected volume22.6 xFPAustin Ekeler23.3 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austin EkelerLAC · RB | 23.3 | 22.6 | +0.7 | 67% | 60% car | — | 0 | 15 | 60% | 8 | 21% |
| Tyson BagentCHI · QB | 13.2 | 18.0 | −4.8 | 100% | 37 att | — | 37 | 4 | 16% | 0 | 0% |
| Justin HerbertLAC · QB | 24.0 | 17.4 | +6.6 | 100% | 40 att | — | 40 | 1 | 4% | 0 | 0% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 17.9 | 16.7 | +1.2 | 83% | 27% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 10 | 27% |
| Keenan AllenLAC · WR | 14.9 | 16.7 | −1.8 | 80% | 26% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 10 | 26% |
| Roschon JohnsonCHI · RB | 6.1 | 10.4 | −4.3 | 36% | 24% car | — | 0 | 6 | 24% | 4 | 11% |
| DJ MooreCHI · WR | 9.5 | 10.0 | −0.5 | 88% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 16% |
| Quentin JohnstonLAC · WR | 10.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 | 70% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 16% |
| Darrynton EvansCHI · RB | 13.0 | 9.1 | +3.9 | 27% | 16% car | — | 0 | 4 | 16% | 4 | 11% |
| D'Onta ForemanCHI · RB | 4.6 | 8.9 | −4.3 | 32% | 36% car | — | 0 | 9 | 36% | 2 | 5% |
| Donald Parham Jr.LAC · TE | 14.3 | 8.3 | +6.0 | 62% | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 13% |
| Darnell MooneyCHI · WR | 5.4 | 7.3 | −1.9 | 85% | 11% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 4 | 11% |
| Joshua PalmerLAC · WR | 5.4 | 6.7 | −1.3 | 68% | 11% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 11% |
| Tyler ScottCHI · WR | 2.1 | 5.0 | −2.9 | 58% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 8% |
| Joshua KelleyLAC · RB | 2.1 | 3.7 | −1.6 | 22% | 24% car | — | 0 | 6 | 24% | 0 | 0% |
| Isaiah SpillerLAC · RB | 1.8 | 3.5 | −1.7 | 12% | 12% car | — | 0 | 3 | 12% | 1 | 3% |
| Derius DavisLAC · WR | 2.4 | 3.3 | −0.9 | 13% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 5% |
| Simi FehokoLAC · WR | 7.9 | 3.3 | +4.6 | 23% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 5% |
| Velus Jones Jr.CHI · WR | 1.4 | 3.3 | −1.9 | 5% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 5% |
| Khari BlasingameCHI · RB | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | — | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Robert TonyanCHI · TE | 1.8 | 1.7 | +0.1 | 23% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Trent TaylorCHI · WR | -0.2 | 0.6 | −0.8 | 15% | 4% car | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Bears 37 targets and 25 carries; Chargers 38 targets and 25 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2023 season: 1.67 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.61 per carry and 0.42 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Tyson Bagent
CHI · QB · 13.2 pts on 18.0 expected
25 of 37 passing for 232 yards, 2 interceptions; 4 carries for -1 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 18.0 expected.
Start/Sit: Tyson Bagent →Justin Herbert Ran hot
LAC · QB · 24.0 pts on 17.4 expected
31 of 40 passing for 298 yards, 3 touchdowns; 1 carry for 1 yard.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 17.4 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 22.2, 29.3, 24.4, 20.1, 12.9, 24.0
W2W3W4W6W7W8
No interceptions after 4 in the previous four games.
Cole Kmet
CHI · TE · 17.9 pts on 16.7 expected
10 targets (27% of the team's), 10 catches for 79 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 16.7 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 4.2, 27.6, 15.2, 2.9, 0.0, 17.9
W3W4W5W6W7W8
Season high in targets (10). Best score since Week 4.
Roschon Johnson
CHI · RB · 6.1 pts on 10.4 expected
4 targets (11% of the team's), 3 catches for 10 yards; 6 carries (24% of the team's) for 21 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 10.4 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 17.5, 6.2, 6.9, 2.5, 1.9, 6.1
W1W2W3W4W5W8
Austin Ekeler Strong role
LAC · RB · 23.3 pts on 22.6 expected
8 targets (21% of the team's), 7 catches for 94 yards and 1 touchdown; 15 carries (60% of the team's) for 29 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 22.6 expected.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 26.4, 10.2, 5.6, 23.3
W1W6W7W8
Season high in targets (8).
Keenan Allen
LAC · WR · 14.9 pts on 16.7 expected
10 targets (26% of the team's), 8 catches for 69 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 16.7 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 31.1, 45.5, 12.2, 21.5, 9.5, 14.9
W2W3W4W6W7W8
Donald Parham Jr. Ran hot
LAC · TE · 14.3 pts on 8.3 expected
5 targets (13% of the team's), 4 catches for 43 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 8.3 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 1.7, 14.4, 0.0, 3.9, 1.9, 14.3
W2W3W4W6W7W8
Best score since Week 3.
Darnell Mooney
CHI · WR · 5.4 pts on 7.3 expected
4 targets (11% of the team's), 1 catch for 41 yards; 1 carry (4% of the team's) for 3 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 7.3 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 0.0, 9.1, 0.0, 6.8, 7.4, 5.4
W3W4W5W6W7W8
Stock Up, Stock Down
Chicago Bears
- ▲Stock up: Roschon Johnson led the backfield with 36% of the snaps after trailing D'Onta Foreman before this game.
- ▲Stock up: Darnell Mooney played 85% of the snaps, up from a 69% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Tyler Scott played 58% of the snaps, up from a 31% season average.
Los Angeles Chargers
- ▲Stock up: Quentin Johnston played 70% of the snaps, up from a 36% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Donald Parham Jr. played 62% of the snaps, up from a 42% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Joshua Kelley played 22% of the snaps, down from a 54% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2023 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Bears D | Chargers D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 16.9 | 19.0 |
| RBs | 23.8 | 23.2 |
| WRs | 31.9 | 37.3 |
| TEs | 13.7 | 11.7 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Los Angeles opened at 50% win probability and passed 98% in the third quarter on the way to the win.
Chargers win probability
Key Swings
- +21Herbert → Ekeler, 39-yd TD50% → 71%Q1 7:08
- +16Herbert → Fehoko, 9-yd TD72% → 88%Q1 0:43
- +4Dicker 43-yd FG90% → 94%Q2 8:50
- −11Evans 11-yd TD run96% → 85%Q2 1:47
- +11Herbert → Parham, 11-yd TD85% → 96%Q2 0:04
Swing in Chargers win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Chicago Bears | Measure | Los Angeles Chargers |
|---|---|---|
| 63 | Plays | 65 |
| 60% | Pass rate | 62% |
| 5.8 | Yds / dropback | 7.5 |
| 2.9 | Yds / carry | 2.2 |
| 6/14 | Third downs | 7/13 |
Efficiency edge Los Angeles ran 2 more plays and gained 1.7 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- CHI Kmet 27% · Moore 16% · Mooney 11%
- LAC Allen 26% · Ekeler 21% · Johnston 16%
Possession Results
| Result | CHI | LAC |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 2 | 3 |
| Field goals | 0 | 3 |
| Punts | 3 | 2 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 1 |
| Turnovers on downs | 2 | 1 |
LAC turnover edge: +1
- The Chargers opened the scoring on their first possession, a 10-play, 92-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
- The Chargers scored touchdowns on two of their first three drives.
All 21 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 4 | 30 | 2:16 | Punt |
| LAC | Q1 12:44 | 10 | 92 | 5:36 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q1 7:08 | 3 | 7 | 2:07 | Punt |
| LAC | Q1 5:01 | 9 | 55 | 4:18 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q1 0:43 | 7 | 30 | 2:58 | Interception |
| LAC | Q2 12:45 | 8 | 32 | 3:55 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q2 8:50 | 14 | 75 | 7:03 | Touchdown |
| LAC | Q2 1:47 | 9 | 75 | 1:43 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 0:04 | 1 | -1 | 0:04 | End of half |
| LAC | Q3 15:00 | 10 | 40 | 6:09 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q3 8:51 | 3 | 2 | 1:37 | Punt |
| LAC | Q3 7:14 | 3 | -1 | 1:06 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 6:08 | 4 | 9 | 2:16 | Downs |
| LAC | Q3 3:52 | 4 | 1 | 0:52 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q3 3:00 | 7 | 49 | 3:03 | Downs |
| LAC | Q4 14:57 | 7 | 38 | 3:19 | Downs |
| CHI | Q4 11:38 | 9 | 34 | 2:44 | Interception |
| LAC | Q4 8:54 | 5 | 20 | 2:40 | Fumble |
| CHI | Q4 6:14 | 10 | 41 | 4:02 | Touchdown |
| LAC | Q4 2:12 | 3 | 3 | 1:50 | Punt |
| CHI | Q4 0:22 | 1 | -1 | 0:22 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Bears vs Chargers Head-to-Head
The Bears and Chargers first met in 1970 and have played 14 times since.
- All-time series
- 7–7Series tied, 14 meetings since 1970
- Postseason
- 0No playoff meetings
- Largest Bears win
- 20–72003
- Largest Chargers win
- 40–71978
Since 2021
1–0 Chargers lead
1 meeting since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- C
Oldest to newest. C = Chargers win, B = Bears win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2023 Wk 8 Bears at Chargers LAC 30 CHI 13 LAC W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2023 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Bears | Stat | Chargers |
|---|---|---|
| 7-10 | Record | 5-12 |
| 21.2 | Points per game | 20.4 |
| 323.2 | Yards per game | 329.4 |
| 5.0 | Yards per play | 5.1 |
| 22.3 | Points allowed per game | 23.4 |
| 324.2 | Yards allowed per game | 362.9 |
Bears and Chargers in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Bear or a Charger, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Bears or Chargers player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Bears and Chargers players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Bears and Chargers defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2023 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Bears vs Chargers Game FAQ
Who won the 2023 Bears vs Chargers Week 8 game?
The Los Angeles Chargers beat the Chicago Bears 30–13 in Week 8 of the 2023 season. The game was played at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, CA, on October 29, 2023. See the Chargers' 2023 schedule.
What was the final score of Bears vs Chargers?
The final score was Chargers 30, Bears 13. The Chargers led 24–7 at halftime, and the second half went Bears 6, Chargers 6.
What happened in the Bears vs Chargers game?
Los Angeles led 24–7 at halftime to win 30–13. The Chargers finished with a 352–295 edge in total offense and averaged 5.4 yards per play. Justin Herbert led all players with 31 of 40 passing for 298 yards and 3 touchdowns, plus a carry for 1 rushing yard. The Bears committed 2 turnovers, the Chargers 1.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Bears vs Chargers?
Justin Herbert led the game with 24.0 PPR fantasy points, the QB8 of Week 8, on 31 of 40 passing for 298 yards and 3 touchdowns, plus a carry for 1 rushing yard. Austin Ekeler was next with 23.3 (RB6). See Justin Herbert's 2023 game log.
Who led Bears vs Chargers in passing, rushing and receiving?
Justin Herbert (LAC) led all passers with 31 of 40 for 298 yards and 3 touchdowns. D'Onta Foreman (CHI) led in rushing with 9 carries for 34 yards. Austin Ekeler (LAC) led in receiving with 7 catches for 94 yards and a touchdown.
How many fantasy points did Justin Herbert score against the Bears?
Justin Herbert scored 24.0 fantasy points against the Bears in Week 8 of the 2023 season, the same in PPR, half-PPR and standard scoring because he had no catches, on 31 of 40 passing for 298 yards and 3 touchdowns, plus a carry for 1 rushing yard.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Bears vs Chargers?
Justin Herbert outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 24.0 PPR points on 17.4 xFP (+6.6). Tyson Bagent fell furthest short, with 13.2 points on 18.0 xFP (−4.8). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Bears vs Chargers?
Austin Ekeler had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 22.6 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 23.3. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Chargers beat the Bears?
The Chargers beat the Bears 30–13 because they averaged 5.4 yards per play to 4.7, won the turnover battle 2–1, and outgained them 352–295.
Which team won the turnover battle in Bears vs Chargers?
The Chargers won the turnover battle 2–1: the Bears gave the ball away 2 times and the Chargers 1 time. The Chargers won the game.
What is the all-time Bears vs Chargers record?
The all-time series is tied 7–7 across 14 meetings since 1970.
When did the Bears and Chargers last play before this game?
Before Week 8 of 2023, they last met in the 2019 season on October 27, 2019, when the Chargers beat the Bears 17–16.
