Final2026 Week 2
SoFi Stadium, Inglewood, CA|
Las Vegas Raiders vs Los Angeles Chargers, Week 2 2026
Las Vegas Raiders
AwayWon
26
Los Angeles Chargers
Home
14
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raiders | 0 | 10 | 7 | 9 | 26 |
| Chargers | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 14 |
LV 26 · LAC 14 Final
Passing leader
LV · QB
21.2PPR pts
19/29, 253 YDS, 3 TD, 1 INT
Top fantasy scorer
LV · WR
22.9PPR pts
5 REC, 119 YDS, 1 TD
Chargers leader
LAC · RB
17.5PPR pts
23 ATT, 94 YDS, 1 TD, 2 REC, 21 REC YDS
Defensive playmaker
Hezekiah Masses
LV
2 INT, 5 TKL
Raiders 26, Chargers 14: Las Vegas beats Los Angeles
Las Vegas led 10–7 at halftime and outscored Los Angeles 16–7 after the break to win 26–14. Los Angeles outgained the Raiders 310–305, but the Raiders averaged 5.1 yards per play.
The Chargers went 5-for-14 on third down and committed three turnovers.
The two teams meet again in Week 14 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +0.1 yards/play LV 5.1 · LAC 5.0
- +2 turnover margin LV 1 · LAC 3 turnovers
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Raider or Charger on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Raiders Won
Las Vegas won the efficiency and turnover battles.
| Raiders | Stat | Chargers |
|---|---|---|
| 5.1 | Yards per play | 5.0 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 3 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 305 | Total yards | 310 |
| 60 | Plays | 62 |
| 29% | Third-down conversion | 36% |
| 27:43 | Time of possession | 32:17 |
Scoring Summary
The Raiders scored three touchdowns, one field goal, and one safety; the Chargers scored two touchdowns.
| Time | Team | Play | LV | LAC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| No scoring | ||||
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 11:51 | LV | Kirk Cousins → Tre Tucker, 40-yard TD Takes leadMatt Gay XP | 7 | 0 |
| 5:26 | LAC | Omarion Hampton 1-yard TD run Ties gameCameron Dicker XP | 7 | 7 |
| 0:04 | LV | Matt Gay 59-yard FG Takes lead | 10 | 7 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 9:49 | LAC | Justin Herbert → Oronde Gadsden, 10-yard TD Takes leadCameron Dicker XP | 10 | 14 |
| 3:53 | LV | Kirk Cousins → Cody White, 13-yard TD Takes leadMatt Gay XP | 17 | 14 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 2:59 | LV | Kirk Cousins → Cody White, 11-yard TD Extends leadMatt Gay XP | 24 | 14 |
| 1:41 | LV | Safety Extends lead | 26 | 14 |
Fantasy Points: Raiders vs Chargers, Week 2 2026
Fantasy leaders
- Tre TuckerLV · WR22.9 PTSWR7
- Kirk CousinsLV · QB21.2 PTSQB10
- Omarion HamptonLAC · RB17.5 PTSRB7
- Cody WhiteLV · WR16.4 PTSWR15
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.2 | QB10 | 19/29 | 253 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 113.1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.9 | QB24 | 15/27 | 192 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 59.5 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.9 | WR7 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 5 | 119 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 17.5 | RB7 | RB | 23 | 94 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 21 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 16.4 | WR15 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 24 | 2 | Start/Sit → | |
| 10.3 | RB23 | RB | 21 | 48 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 15 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.8 | TE15 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 18 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.5 | WR60 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 35 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.3 | WR62 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 53 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.3 | TE25 | TE | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 23 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.1 | TE26 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 21 | 0 | ||
| 4.9 | RB45 | RB | 5 | 24 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.5 | WR76 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 25 | 0 | ||
| 3.7 | WR84 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 27 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.4 | WR92 | WR | 1 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.3 | WR94 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 13 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.1 | TE44 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.9 | TE45 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 9 | 0 | ||
| 1.9 | WR100 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 9 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.7 | RB78 | RB | 3 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0.1 | RB82 | RB | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Las Vegas Raiders
Snap Share
Michael MayerTE53 snaps84%
Ashton JeantyRB51 snaps81%
Jalen NailorWR38 snaps60%
Tre TuckerWR37 snaps59%
Jack BechWR34 snaps54%
Target Share29 targets
- Tre Tucker24%, 7 targets
- Ashton Jeanty24%, 7 targets
- Michael Mayer14%, 4 targets
- Jalen Nailor10%, 3 targets
- Cody White7%, 2 targets
- Other21%, 6 targets
Carry Share29 carries
- Ashton Jeanty72%, 21 carries
- Kirk Cousins14%, 4 carries
- Mike Washington10%, 3 carries
- Connor Heyward3%, 1 carries
Los Angeles Chargers
Snap Share
Tre' HarrisWR56 snaps82%
Quentin JohnstonWR55 snaps81%
Omarion HamptonRB43 snaps63%
Charlie KolarTE42 snaps62%
Ladd McConkeyWR31 snaps46%
Target Share26 targets
- Quentin Johnston19%, 5 targets
- David Njoku12%, 3 targets
- Charlie Kolar12%, 3 targets
- Ladd McConkey12%, 3 targets
- Tre' Harris12%, 3 targets
- Other35%, 9 targets
Carry Share32 carries
- Omarion Hampton72%, 23 carries
- Keaton Mitchell16%, 5 carries
- Justin Herbert9%, 3 carries
- Quentin Johnston3%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53 | 84% | 4 | 14% | 0 | |
| 56 | 82% | 3 | 12% | 0 | |
| 51 | 81% | 7 | 24% | 21 | |
| 55 | 81% | 5 | 19% | 1 | |
| 43 | 63% | 2 | 8% | 23 | |
| 42 | 62% | 3 | 12% | 0 | |
| 38 | 60% | 3 | 10% | 0 | |
| 37 | 59% | 7 | 24% | 0 | |
| 34 | 54% | 2 | 7% | 0 | |
| 31 | 49% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 31 | 46% | 3 | 12% | 0 | |
| 30 | 44% | 2 | 8% | 0 | |
| 28 | 41% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 19 | 30% | 0 | 0% | 1 | |
| 17 | 25% | 1 | 4% | 5 | |
| 12 | 19% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 12 | 19% | 1 | 3% | 3 | |
| 12 | 18% | 3 | 12% | 0 | |
| 11 | 16% | 3 | 12% | 0 | |
| 8 | 13% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 8 | 13% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 8 | 12% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 7 | 11% | 2 | 7% | 0 | |
| 7 | 10% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 3 | 5% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+12.9Cody White16.4 PTS vs 3.5 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−14.6Ashton Jeanty10.3 PTS vs 24.9 xFP
- Highest expected volume24.9 xFPAshton Jeanty10.3 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashton JeantyLV · RB | 10.3 | 24.9 | −14.6 | 81% | 72% car | — | 0 | 21 | 72% | 7 | 24% |
| Omarion HamptonLAC · RB | 17.5 | 17.4 | +0.1 | 63% | 72% car | — | 0 | 23 | 72% | 2 | 8% |
| Kirk CousinsLV · QB | 21.2 | 15.9 | +5.3 | 100% | 29 att | — | 29 | 4 | 14% | 0 | 0% |
| Justin HerbertLAC · QB | 9.9 | 14.4 | −4.5 | 100% | 27 att | — | 27 | 3 | 9% | 0 | 0% |
| Tre TuckerLV · WR | 22.9 | 12.2 | +10.7 | 59% | 24% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 24% |
| Quentin JohnstonLAC · WR | 2.4 | 9.3 | −6.9 | 81% | 19% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 5 | 19% |
| Michael MayerLV · TE | 5.3 | 7.0 | −1.7 | 84% | 14% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 14% |
| Brenen ThompsonLAC · WR | 2.3 | 5.2 | −2.9 | 18% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 12% |
| Charlie KolarLAC · TE | 5.1 | 5.2 | −0.1 | 62% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 12% |
| David NjokuLAC · TE | 1.9 | 5.2 | −3.3 | 16% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 12% |
| Jalen NailorLV · WR | 1.9 | 5.2 | −3.3 | 60% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 10% |
| Ladd McConkeyLAC · WR | 6.5 | 5.2 | +1.3 | 46% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 12% |
| Tre' HarrisLAC · WR | 6.3 | 5.2 | +1.1 | 82% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 12% |
| Keaton MitchellLAC · RB | 4.9 | 4.8 | +0.1 | 25% | 16% car | — | 0 | 5 | 16% | 1 | 4% |
| Mike Washington Jr.LV · RB | 0.7 | 3.6 | −2.9 | 19% | 10% car | — | 0 | 3 | 10% | 1 | 3% |
| Cody WhiteLV · WR | 16.4 | 3.5 | +12.9 | 11% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Jack BechLV · WR | 4.5 | 3.5 | +1.0 | 54% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Oronde GadsdenLAC · TE | 9.8 | 3.5 | +6.3 | 44% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 8% |
| Dareke YoungLV · WR | 3.7 | 1.7 | +2.0 | 19% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Derius DavisLAC · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 12% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Ian ThomasLV · TE | 2.1 | 1.7 | +0.4 | 49% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Malik BensonLV · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 13% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Connor HeywardLV · RB | 0.1 | 0.6 | −0.5 | 30% | 3% car | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Raiders 29 targets and 29 carries; Chargers 26 targets and 32 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2026 season: 1.75 PPR points per target (68% catch rate), 0.60 per carry and 0.47 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Kirk Cousins Ran hot
LV · QB · 21.2 pts on 15.9 expected
19 of 29 passing for 253 yards, 3 touchdowns, 1 interception; 4 carries for 1 yard.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 15.9 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 4 against the Chiefs. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Kirk Cousins →Justin Herbert
LAC · QB · 9.9 pts on 14.4 expected
15 of 27 passing for 192 yards, 1 touchdown, 2 interceptions; 3 carries for 2 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 14.4 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Seahawks. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Justin Herbert →Ashton Jeanty Volume, no payoff
LV · RB · 10.3 pts on 24.9 expected
7 targets (24% of the team's), 4 catches for 15 yards; 21 carries (72% of the team's) for 48 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 24.9 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't. Next up: Week 4 against the Chiefs. Bet on the role more than the result.
Trend: Season high in targets (7).
Tre Tucker Ran hot
LV · WR · 22.9 pts on 12.2 expected
7 targets (24% of the team's), 5 catches for 119 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 12.2 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 4 against the Chiefs. Bet on the role more than the result.
Trend: Season high in targets (7).
Omarion Hampton Strong role
LAC · RB · 17.5 pts on 17.4 expected
2 targets (8% of the team's), 2 catches for 21 yards; 23 carries (72% of the team's) for 94 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 17.4 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Seahawks. Bet on the role more than the result.
Trend: Season high in carries (23).
Quentin Johnston Unlucky
LAC · WR · 2.4 pts on 9.3 expected
5 targets (19% of the team's), 1 catch for 7 yards; 1 carry (3% of the team's) for 7 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 9.3 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't. Next up: Week 4 against the Seahawks. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Quentin Johnston →Cody White Ran hot
LV · WR · 16.4 pts on 3.5 expected
2 targets (7% of the team's), 2 catches for 24 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 3.5 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 4 against the Chiefs. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Cody White →Oronde Gadsden Ran hot
LAC · TE · 9.8 pts on 3.5 expected
2 targets (8% of the team's), 2 catches for 18 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 3.5 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 4 against the Seahawks. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Oronde Gadsden →Start/Sit Decisions
Stock Up, Stock Down
Las Vegas Raiders
- ▼Stock down: Connor Heyward played 30% of the snaps, down from a 47% season average.
Los Angeles Chargers
- ▲Stock up: Oronde Gadsden played 44% of the snaps, up from a 18% season average.
- ▼Stock down: David Njoku played 16% of the snaps, down from a 55% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2026 through Week 3.
| Points allowed to | Raiders D | Chargers D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 17.5 | 19.1 |
| RBs | 17.1 | 20.5 |
| WRs | 22.8 | 32.9 |
| TEs | 21.1 | 12.4 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Los Angeles opened at 68% win probability and fell below 2% in the fourth quarter.
Chargers win probability
Key Swings
- −24Cousins → Tucker, 40-yd TD66% → 41%Q2 11:51
- +26Hampton 1-yd TD run38% → 64%Q2 5:26
- +29Herbert → Gadsden, 10-yd TD49% → 78%Q3 9:49
- −34Cousins → White, 13-yd TD79% → 45%Q3 3:53
- −19Cousins → White, 11-yd TD19% → <1%Q4 2:59
Swing in Chargers win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Las Vegas Raiders | Measure | Los Angeles Chargers |
|---|---|---|
| 60 | Plays | 62 |
| 52% | Pass rate | 48% |
| 8.0 | Yds / dropback | 6.1 |
| 2.0 | Yds / carry | 4.0 |
| 4/14 | Third downs | 5/14 |
Efficiency edge Las Vegas ran 2 fewer plays but gained 1.9 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- LV Jeanty 24% · Tucker 24% · Mayer 14%
- LAC Johnston 19% · Thompson 12% · Kolar 12%
Possession Results
| Result | LV | LAC |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 3 | 2 |
| Field goals | 1 | 0 |
| Punts | 6 | 5 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 3 |
| Turnovers on downs | 1 | 0 |
| Missed field goals | 0 | 1 |
| Safeties | 0 | 1 |
LV turnover edge: +2
- The Raiders opened the scoring on their fourth possession, a 3-play, 51-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
- The Raiders drained the clock with two second-half drives of four to six minutes.
All 26 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAC | Q1 15:00 | 8 | 28 | 3:21 | Missed FG |
| LV | Q1 11:39 | 5 | 20 | 2:42 | Interception |
| LAC | Q1 8:57 | 6 | 15 | 3:28 | Punt |
| LV | Q1 5:29 | 3 | 7 | 1:25 | Punt |
| LAC | Q1 4:04 | 3 | 5 | 0:50 | Interception |
| LV | Q1 3:14 | 5 | 22 | 2:39 | Downs |
| LAC | Q1 0:35 | 3 | 4 | 2:22 | Punt |
| LV | Q2 13:13 | 3 | 51 | 1:22 | Touchdown |
| LAC | Q2 11:51 | 10 | 69 | 6:25 | Touchdown |
| LV | Q2 5:26 | 5 | 9 | 3:33 | Punt |
| LAC | Q2 1:53 | 6 | 21 | 1:18 | Punt |
| LV | Q2 0:35 | 6 | 43 | 0:31 | Field goal |
| LAC | Q2 0:04 | 1 | 17 | 0:04 | End of half |
| LV | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 1 | 1:04 | Punt |
| LAC | Q3 13:56 | 7 | 74 | 4:07 | Touchdown |
| LV | Q3 9:49 | 11 | 74 | 5:56 | Touchdown |
| LAC | Q3 3:53 | 3 | 5 | 2:24 | Punt |
| LV | Q3 1:29 | 8 | 23 | 4:03 | Punt |
| LAC | Q4 12:26 | 6 | 18 | 4:07 | Punt |
| LV | Q4 8:19 | 3 | 9 | 1:32 | Punt |
| LAC | Q4 6:47 | 6 | 30 | 3:05 | Fumble |
| LV | Q4 3:42 | 3 | 16 | 0:43 | Touchdown |
| LAC | Q4 2:59 | 3 | -1 | 0:35 | Interception |
| LV | Q4 2:24 | 3 | 8 | 0:32 | Punt |
| LAC | Q4 1:52 | 1 | -6 | 0:11 | Safety |
| LV | Q4 1:41 | 3 | -3 | 1:41 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Raiders vs Chargers Head-to-Head
The Raiders and Chargers first met in 1960 and have played 134 times since. They have been AFC West rivals since 1970.
- All-time series
- 70–62–2Raiders lead, 134 meetings since 1960
- Postseason
- 1–0Raiders won in 1980
- Largest Raiders win
- 63–212023
- Largest Chargers win
- 44–01961
Since 2021
7–4 Chargers lead
11 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- C
- R
- C
- R
- C
- R
- C
- C
- C
- C
- R
Oldest to newest. C = Chargers win, R = Raiders win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 14 Chargers at Raiders Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2026 Wk 2 Raiders at Chargers LV 26 LAC 14 LV W
- 2025 Wk 13 Raiders at Chargers, 2025 Wk 13 recap LAC 31 LV 14 LAC W
- 2025 Wk 2 Chargers at Raiders, 2025 Wk 2 recap LAC 20 LV 9 LAC W
- 2024 Wk 18 Chargers at Raiders, 2024 Wk 18 recap LAC 34 LV 20 LAC W
- 2024 Wk 1 Raiders at Chargers, 2024 Wk 1 recap LAC 22 LV 10 LAC W
- 2023 Wk 15 Chargers at Raiders, 2023 Wk 15 recap LV 63 LAC 21 LV W
- 2023 Wk 4 Raiders at Chargers, 2023 Wk 4 recap LAC 24 LV 17 LAC W
- 2022 Wk 13 Chargers at Raiders, 2022 Wk 13 recap LV 27 LAC 20 LV W
- 2022 Wk 1 Raiders at Chargers, 2022 Wk 1 recap LAC 24 LV 19 LAC W
- 2021 Wk 18 Chargers at Raiders, 2021 Wk 18 recap LV 35 LAC 32 LV W
- 2021 Wk 4 Raiders at Chargers, 2021 Wk 4 recap LAC 28 LV 14 LAC W
Season to Date (Through Week 3)
The 2026 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Raiders | Stat | Chargers |
|---|---|---|
| 3-0 | Record | 0-3 |
| 29.3 | Points per game | 14.7 |
| 311.7 | Yards per game | 308.7 |
| 4.9 | Yards per play | 5.2 |
| 18.0 | Points allowed per game | 25.3 |
| 316.7 | Yards allowed per game | 349.3 |
Raiders vs Chargers Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- LAC −6.5Chargers failed to cover by 18.5
- Total
- 43.5Under: 40 points scored (by 3.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chargers | 25.0 | 14 | −11.0 |
| Raiders | 18.5 | 26 | +7.5 |
The Raiders beat their implied total and the Chargers fell short of theirs; the Fantasy tab has the player lines behind it.
Betting Trends
Last 6 meetings: Raiders 3–3 ATS, unders 4–2.
Each team's 2026 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Las Vegas Raiders
- Against the spread
- 2–0
- Over/under
- 0–2
- ATS as favorite
- 1–0
- ATS as underdog
- 1–0
- ATS on the road
- 1–0
Los Angeles Chargers
- Against the spread
- 0–2
- Over/under
- 0–2
- ATS as favorite
- 0–2
- ATS at home
- 0–2
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Raiders vs Chargers Fantasy Outlook for 2026
One meeting is left on the 2026 schedule: Week 14 in Las Vegas. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Raiders or Chargers player start in Week 14? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Raiders and Chargers players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Raiders and Chargers defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere this matchup falls in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2026 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Raiders vs Chargers Game FAQ
Who won the 2026 Raiders vs Chargers Week 2 game?
The Las Vegas Raiders beat the Los Angeles Chargers 26–14 in Week 2 of the 2026 season. The game was played at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, CA, on September 20, 2026. See the Raiders' 2026 schedule.
What was the final score of Raiders vs Chargers?
The final score was Raiders 26, Chargers 14. The Raiders led 10–7 at halftime, and the second half went Raiders 16, Chargers 7.
What happened in the Raiders vs Chargers game?
Las Vegas led 10–7 at halftime and outscored Los Angeles 16–7 after the break to win 26–14. Los Angeles outgained the Raiders 310–305, but the Raiders averaged 5.1 yards per play. Tre Tucker led all players with 5 catches for 119 yards and a touchdown. The Chargers committed 3 turnovers, the Raiders 1.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Raiders vs Chargers?
Tre Tucker led the game with 22.9 PPR fantasy points, the WR7 of Week 2, on 5 catches for 119 yards and a touchdown. Kirk Cousins was next with 21.2 (QB10). See Tre Tucker's 2026 game log.
Who led Raiders vs Chargers in passing, rushing and receiving?
Kirk Cousins (LV) led all passers with 19 of 29 for 253 yards, 3 touchdowns and an interception. Omarion Hampton (LAC) led in rushing with 23 carries for 94 yards and a touchdown. Tre Tucker (LV) led in receiving with 5 catches for 119 yards and a touchdown.
How many fantasy points did Tre Tucker score against the Chargers?
Tre Tucker scored 22.9 points in PPR leagues, 20.4 in half-PPR and 17.9 in standard scoring against the Chargers in Week 2 of the 2026 season, on 5 catches for 119 yards and a touchdown. He drew 24% of his team's targets.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Raiders vs Chargers?
Cody White outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 16.4 PPR points on 3.5 xFP (+12.9). Ashton Jeanty fell furthest short, with 10.3 points on 24.9 xFP (−14.6). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
How did the Raiders come back to beat the Chargers?
The Raiders' chances of winning fell as low as 21% in the third quarter. Kirk Cousins' 13-yard touchdown pass to Cody White in the third quarter was the biggest swing of the game. They finished the comeback with a 26–14 win.
Which team won the turnover battle in Raiders vs Chargers?
The Raiders won the turnover battle 3–1: the Chargers gave the ball away 3 times and the Raiders 1 time. The Raiders won the game.
What is the all-time Raiders vs Chargers record?
The Raiders lead the all-time series 70–62–2 across 134 meetings since 1960, including a 1–0 record in the postseason.
When did the Raiders and Chargers last play before this game?
Before Week 2 of 2026, they last met in the 2025 season on November 30, 2025, when the Chargers beat the Raiders 31–14.
Have the Raiders and Chargers met in the playoffs?
Yes, 1 time, most recently in the 1980 playoffs. The Raiders are 1–0 against the Chargers in the postseason.
What was the closing spread for Raiders vs Chargers?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Chargers −6.5, making the Los Angeles Chargers 6.5-point favorites, with a closing total of 43.5. That implied about 25.0 points for the Chargers and 18.5 for the Raiders.
Did Raiders vs Chargers go over or under the total?
The game went under. The consensus closing total was 43.5, and the teams combined for 40 points, 3.5 under the number.
Who covered the spread in Raiders vs Chargers?
The Raiders covered as 6.5-point underdogs against the closing line of Chargers −6.5. The final margin was 12 points.
