Final2023 Week 1
Northwest Stadium, Landover, MD|
Arizona Cardinals vs Washington Commanders, Week 1 2023
Arizona Cardinals
Away
16
Washington Commanders
HomeWon
20
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardinals | 3 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 16 |
| Commanders | 7 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 20 |
ARI 16 · WAS 20 Final
Passing leader
WAS · QB
16.2PPR pts
19/31, 202 YDS, 1 TD, 1 INT, 1 RUSH TD
Top fantasy scorer
Brian Robinson Jr.
WAS · RB
13.6PPR pts
19 ATT, 59 YDS, 1 REC, 7 REC YDS, 1 REC TD
Cardinals leader
ARI · RB
12.0PPR pts
14 ATT, 62 YDS, 5 REC, 8 REC YDS
Defensive playmaker
Cameron Thomas
ARI
1 TD, 1 TKL
Commanders 20, Cardinals 16: Washington rallies from 3 down at halftime
Washington erased a 13–10 halftime deficit, outscoring Arizona 10–3 after the break to win 20–16. The Commanders finished with a 248–210 edge in total offense and averaged 3.8 yards per play.
The Cardinals went 4-for-14 on third down and committed two turnovers.
The two teams meet again in Week 12 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +0.2 yards/play WAS 3.8 · ARI 3.6
- +38 total yards WAS 248 · ARI 210
- +4% third-down rate WAS 33% · ARI 29%
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Cardinal or Commander on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Commanders Won
Washington won the efficiency, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Cardinals | Stat | Commanders |
|---|---|---|
| 3.6 | Yards per play | 3.8 |
| 210 | Total yards | 248 |
| 29% | Third-down conversion | 33% |
| Other team stats | ||
| 58 | Plays | 65 |
| 2 | Turnovers | 3 |
| 28:36 | Time of possession | 31:24 |
Scoring Summary
The Commanders scored two touchdowns and two field goals; the Cardinals scored one touchdown and three field goals.
| Time | Team | Play | ARI | WAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 4:15 | WAS | Sam Howell → Brian Robinson Jr., 7-yard TD Takes leadJoey Slye XP | 0 | 7 |
| 0:53 | ARI | Matt Prater 28-yard FG | 3 | 7 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 13:26 | ARI | Matt Prater 54-yard FG | 6 | 7 |
| 0:55 | ARI | Cameron Thomas 2-yard fumble return TD Takes leadMatt Prater XP | 13 | 7 |
| 0:00 | WAS | Joey Slye 30-yard FG | 13 | 10 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 10:09 | ARI | Matt Prater 37-yard FG Extends lead | 16 | 10 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 11:48 | WAS | Sam Howell 6-yard TD run Game winnerJoey Slye XP | 16 | 17 |
| 2:23 | WAS | Joey Slye 33-yard FG Extends lead | 16 | 20 |
Fantasy Points: Cardinals vs Commanders, Week 1 2023
Fantasy leaders
- Sam HowellWAS · QB16.2 PTSQB11
- Brian RobinsonWAS · RB13.6 PTSRB15
- James ConnerARI · RB12.0 PTSRB20
- Curtis SamuelWAS · WR11.0 PTSWR38
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16.2 | QB11 | 19/31 | 202 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 1 | 77.6 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.0 | QB32 | 21/30 | 132 | 0 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | 78.8 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13.6 | RB15 | RB | 19 | 59 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 1 | ||
| 12.0 | RB20 | RB | 14 | 62 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 0 | ||
| 11.0 | WR38 | WR | 1 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 54 | 0 | ||
| 9.0 | WR46 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 5 | 40 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.7 | WR48 | WR | 1 | 29 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 28 | 0 | ||
| 8.3 | TE11 | TE | — | — | — | 8 | 4 | 43 | 0 | ||
| 8.1 | TE12 | TE | — | — | — | 10 | 6 | 21 | 0 | ||
| 7.5 | WR53 | WR | 2 | 12 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 33 | 0 | ||
| 5.1 | WR70 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 31 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.3 | TE30 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 23 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.9 | WR81 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 19 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.7 | TE40 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 17 | 0 | ||
| 0.9 | RB76 | RB | 3 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | ||
| 0.7 | RB80 | RB | 3 | 7 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| -0.4 | — | RB | 5 | -4 | 0 | — | — | — | — |
Fantasy Usage
Arizona Cardinals
Snap Share
Michael WilsonWR56 snaps90%
James ConnerRB52 snaps84%
Marquise BrownWR52 snaps84%
Zach ErtzTE48 snaps77%
Rondale MooreWR42 snaps68%
Target Share30 targets
- Zach Ertz33%, 10 targets
- James Conner17%, 5 targets
- Marquise Brown17%, 5 targets
- Michael Wilson13%, 4 targets
- Rondale Moore10%, 3 targets
- Other10%, 3 targets
Carry Share25 carries
- James Conner56%, 14 carries
- Keaontay Ingram20%, 5 carries
- Joshua Dobbs12%, 3 carries
- Rondale Moore8%, 2 carries
- Marquise Brown4%, 1 carries
Washington Commanders
Snap Share
Terry McLaurinWR63 snaps89%
Jahan DotsonWR62 snaps87%
Logan ThomasTE58 snaps82%
Curtis SamuelWR46 snaps65%
Brian RobinsonRB43 snaps61%
Target Share29 targets
- Logan Thomas28%, 8 targets
- Jahan Dotson24%, 7 targets
- Curtis Samuel17%, 5 targets
- Terry McLaurin14%, 4 targets
- Brian Robinson7%, 2 targets
- Other10%, 3 targets
Carry Share28 carries
- Brian Robinson68%, 19 carries
- Antonio Gibson11%, 3 carries
- Chris Rodriguez11%, 3 carries
- Sam Howell7%, 2 carries
- Curtis Samuel4%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 56 | 90% | 4 | 13% | 0 | |
| 63 | 89% | 4 | 14% | 0 | |
| 62 | 87% | 7 | 24% | 0 | |
| 52 | 84% | 5 | 17% | 14 | |
| 52 | 84% | 5 | 17% | 1 | |
| 58 | 82% | 8 | 28% | 0 | |
| 48 | 77% | 10 | 33% | 0 | |
| 42 | 68% | 3 | 10% | 2 | |
| 46 | 65% | 5 | 17% | 1 | |
| 43 | 61% | 2 | 7% | 19 | |
| 23 | 37% | 2 | 7% | 0 | |
| 26 | 37% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 25 | 35% | 1 | 3% | 3 | |
| 18 | 29% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 19 | 27% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 10 | 14% | 2 | 7% | 0 | |
| 7 | 11% | 0 | 0% | 5 | |
| 5 | 8% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 3 | 5% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 3 | 4% | 0 | 0% | 3 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+2.0Curtis Samuel11.0 PTS vs 9.0 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−13.5Joshua Dobbs1.0 PTS vs 14.5 xFP
- Highest expected volume16.9 xFPJames Conner12.0 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James ConnerARI · RB | 12.0 | 16.9 | −4.9 | 84% | 56% car | — | 0 | 14 | 56% | 5 | 17% |
| Zach ErtzARI · TE | 8.1 | 16.7 | −8.6 | 77% | 33% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 10 | 33% |
| Brian Robinson Jr.WAS · RB | 13.6 | 15.0 | −1.4 | 61% | 68% car | — | 0 | 19 | 68% | 2 | 7% |
| Joshua DobbsARI · QB | 1.0 | 14.5 | −13.5 | 100% | 30 att | — | 30 | 3 | 12% | 0 | 0% |
| Sam HowellWAS · QB | 16.2 | 14.3 | +1.9 | 100% | 31 att | — | 31 | 2 | 7% | 0 | 0% |
| Logan ThomasWAS · TE | 8.3 | 13.4 | −5.1 | 82% | 28% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 28% |
| Jahan DotsonWAS · WR | 9.0 | 11.7 | −2.7 | 87% | 24% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 24% |
| Curtis SamuelWAS · WR | 11.0 | 9.0 | +2.0 | 65% | 17% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 5 | 17% |
| Hollywood BrownARI · — | 8.7 | 9.0 | −0.3 | — | 17% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 5 | 17% |
| Michael WilsonARI · WR | 3.9 | 6.7 | −2.8 | 90% | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 13% |
| Terry McLaurinWAS · WR | 5.1 | 6.7 | −1.6 | 89% | 14% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 14% |
| Rondale MooreARI · WR | 7.5 | 6.2 | +1.3 | 68% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 2 | 8% | 3 | 10% |
| Antonio GibsonWAS · RB | 0.9 | 3.5 | −2.6 | 35% | 11% car | — | 0 | 3 | 11% | 1 | 3% |
| Cole TurnerWAS · TE | 2.7 | 3.3 | −0.6 | 14% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Trey McBrideARI · TE | 4.3 | 3.3 | +1.0 | 37% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Keaontay IngramARI · RB | -0.4 | 3.1 | −3.5 | 11% | 20% car | — | 0 | 5 | 20% | 0 | 0% |
| Chris Rodriguez Jr.WAS · RB | 0.7 | 1.8 | −1.1 | 4% | 11% car | — | 0 | 3 | 11% | 0 | 0% |
| Zach PascalARI · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 8% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
Team totals: Cardinals 30 targets and 25 carries; Commanders 29 targets and 28 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2023 season: 1.67 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.61 per carry and 0.42 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Joshua Dobbs Unlucky
ARI · QB · 1.0 pts on 14.5 expected
21 of 30 passing for 132 yards; 3 carries for -3 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 14.5 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Start/Sit: Joshua Dobbs →Sam Howell
WAS · QB · 16.2 pts on 14.3 expected
19 of 31 passing for 202 yards, 1 touchdown, 1 interception; 2 carries for 11 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 14.3 expected.
Start/Sit: Sam Howell →James Conner
ARI · RB · 12.0 pts on 16.9 expected
5 targets (17% of the team's), 5 catches for 8 yards; 14 carries (56% of the team's) for 62 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 16.9 expected.
Zach Ertz Volume, no payoff
ARI · TE · 8.1 pts on 16.7 expected
10 targets (33% of the team's), 6 catches for 21 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 16.7 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Brian Robinson Jr. Volume, no payoff
WAS · RB · 13.6 pts on 15.0 expected
2 targets (7% of the team's), 1 catch for 7 yards and 1 touchdown; 19 carries (68% of the team's) for 59 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 15.0 expected.
Logan Thomas Unlucky
WAS · TE · 8.3 pts on 13.4 expected
8 targets (28% of the team's), 4 catches for 43 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 13.4 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2023 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Cardinals D | Commanders D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 19.4 | 21.1 |
| RBs | 26.2 | 25.0 |
| WRs | 32.5 | 41.1 |
| TEs | 11.2 | 10.5 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Washington opened at 70% win probability and passed 98% in the fourth quarter on the way to the win.
Commanders win probability
Key Swings
- +17Howell → Robinson, 7-yd TD68% → 85%Q1 4:15
- −28Thomas 2-yd TD68% → 40%Q2 0:55
- −13Prater 37-yd FG50% → 36%Q3 10:09
- +43Howell 6-yd TD run22% → 65%Q4 11:48
- +26Slye 33-yd FG68% → 94%Q4 2:23
Swing in Commanders win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Arizona Cardinals | Measure | Washington Commanders |
|---|---|---|
| 58 | Plays | 65 |
| 57% | Pass rate | 57% |
| 3.5 | Yds / dropback | 4.2 |
| 3.8 | Yds / carry | 3.3 |
| 4/14 | Third downs | 4/12 |
Efficiency edge Washington ran 7 more plays and gained 0.7 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- ARI Ertz 33% · Brown 17% · Conner 17%
- WAS Thomas 28% · Dotson 24% · Samuel 17%
Possession Results
| Result | ARI | WAS |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 0 | 2 |
| Field goals | 3 | 2 |
| Punts | 5 | 6 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 3 |
| Turnovers on downs | 1 | 0 |
ARI turnover edge: +1
- The Commanders opened the scoring on their second possession, a 6-play, 91-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
All 24 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAS | Q1 15:00 | 8 | 26 | 4:01 | Punt |
| ARI | Q1 10:59 | 6 | 13 | 3:24 | Punt |
| WAS | Q1 7:35 | 6 | 91 | 3:20 | Touchdown |
| ARI | Q1 4:15 | 8 | 64 | 3:22 | Field goal |
| WAS | Q1 0:53 | 2 | 4 | 1:07 | Interception |
| ARI | Q2 14:46 | 4 | 1 | 1:20 | Field goal |
| WAS | Q2 13:26 | 8 | 59 | 4:35 | Fumble |
| ARI | Q2 8:51 | 3 | -1 | 2:34 | Punt |
| WAS | Q2 6:17 | 4 | 4 | 1:50 | Punt |
| ARI | Q2 4:27 | 6 | 25 | 2:58 | Punt |
| WAS | Q2 1:29 | 4 | -10 | 0:34 | Fumble |
| WAS | Q2 0:55 | 7 | 69 | 0:55 | Field goal |
| ARI | Q3 15:00 | 11 | 56 | 4:51 | Field goal |
| WAS | Q3 10:09 | 7 | 0 | 4:47 | Punt |
| ARI | Q3 5:22 | 4 | 14 | 2:28 | Punt |
| WAS | Q3 2:54 | 3 | 2 | 1:26 | Punt |
| ARI | Q3 1:28 | 3 | -11 | 1:26 | Fumble |
| WAS | Q3 0:02 | 7 | 29 | 3:14 | Touchdown |
| ARI | Q4 11:48 | 3 | -2 | 2:01 | Punt |
| WAS | Q4 9:47 | 3 | 9 | 2:10 | Punt |
| ARI | Q4 7:37 | 7 | 17 | 2:59 | Fumble |
| WAS | Q4 4:38 | 4 | 7 | 2:15 | Field goal |
| ARI | Q4 2:23 | 6 | 12 | 1:13 | Downs |
| WAS | Q4 1:10 | 4 | -5 | 1:10 | Punt |
About these numbers
The Cardinals' fumble touchdown is counted as a Commanders lost fumble, not as a Cardinals possession. Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Cardinals vs Commanders Head-to-Head
The Cardinals and Commanders first met in 1932 and have played 127 times since.
- All-time series
- 78–47–2Commanders lead, 127 meetings since 1932
- Postseason
- 0No playoff meetings
- Largest Cardinals win
- 44–71960
- Largest Commanders win
- 41–31992
Since 2021
2–0 Commanders lead
2 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- WAS
- WAS
Oldest to newest. WAS = Commanders win, ARI = Cardinals win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 12 Commanders at Cardinals Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2024 Wk 4 Commanders at Cardinals, 2024 Wk 4 recap WAS 42 ARI 14 WAS W
- 2023 Wk 1 Cardinals at Commanders WAS 20 ARI 16 WAS W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2023 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Cardinals | Stat | Commanders |
|---|---|---|
| 4-13 | Record | 4-13 |
| 19.4 | Points per game | 19.4 |
| 324.1 | Yards per game | 312.8 |
| 5.2 | Yards per play | 5.0 |
| 26.8 | Points allowed per game | 30.5 |
| 355.7 | Yards allowed per game | 388.9 |
Cardinals vs Commanders Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- WAS −7Commanders failed to cover by 3
- Total
- 38Under: 36 points scored (by 2)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commanders | 22.5 | 20 | −2.5 |
| Cardinals | 15.5 | 16 | +0.5 |
The Cardinals beat their implied total and the Commanders fell short of theirs; the Fantasy tab has the player lines behind it.
Betting Trends
Each team's 2023 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Arizona Cardinals
- Against the spread
- 1–0
- Over/under
- 0–1
- ATS as underdog
- 1–0
- ATS on the road
- 1–0
Washington Commanders
- Against the spread
- 0–1
- Over/under
- 0–1
- ATS as favorite
- 0–1
- ATS at home
- 0–1
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Cardinals vs Commanders Fantasy Outlook for 2026
One meeting is left on the 2026 schedule: Week 12 in Arizona. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Cardinals or Commanders player start in Week 12? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Cardinals and Commanders players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Cardinals and Commanders defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere this matchup falls in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2023 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Cardinals vs Commanders Game FAQ
Who won the 2023 Cardinals vs Commanders Week 1 game?
The Washington Commanders beat the Arizona Cardinals 20–16 in Week 1 of the 2023 season. The game was played at Northwest Stadium in Landover, MD, on September 10, 2023. See the Commanders' 2023 schedule.
What was the final score of Cardinals vs Commanders?
The final score was Commanders 20, Cardinals 16. The Cardinals led 13–10 at halftime, and the second half went Cardinals 3, Commanders 10.
What happened in the Cardinals vs Commanders game?
Washington erased a 13–10 halftime deficit, outscoring Arizona 10–3 after the break to win 20–16. The Commanders finished with a 248–210 edge in total offense and averaged 3.8 yards per play. Sam Howell led all players with 19 of 31 passing for 202 yards and a touchdown, plus 2 carries for 11 rushing yards and a touchdown. The Commanders committed 3 turnovers, the Cardinals 2.
What was the game-winning score in Cardinals vs Commanders?
Sam Howell's 6-yard touchdown run with 11:48 left in the fourth quarter gave the Commanders a 17–16 lead they never gave up.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Cardinals vs Commanders?
Sam Howell led the game with 16.2 PPR fantasy points, the QB11 of Week 1, on 19 of 31 passing for 202 yards and a touchdown, plus 2 carries for 11 rushing yards and a touchdown. Brian Robinson was next with 13.6 (RB15). See Sam Howell's 2023 game log.
Who led Cardinals vs Commanders in passing, rushing and receiving?
Sam Howell (WAS) led all passers with 19 of 31 for 202 yards, a touchdown and an interception. James Conner (ARI) led in rushing with 14 carries for 62 yards. Curtis Samuel (WAS) led in receiving with 5 catches for 54 yards.
How many fantasy points did Sam Howell score against the Cardinals?
Sam Howell scored 16.2 fantasy points against the Cardinals in Week 1 of the 2023 season, the same in PPR, half-PPR and standard scoring because he had no catches, on 19 of 31 passing for 202 yards and a touchdown, plus 2 carries for 11 rushing yards and a touchdown.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Cardinals vs Commanders?
Curtis Samuel outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 11.0 PPR points on 9.0 xFP (+2.0). Joshua Dobbs fell furthest short, with 1.0 points on 14.5 xFP (−13.5). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
How did the Commanders come back to beat the Cardinals?
The Commanders' chances of winning fell as low as 22% in the fourth quarter. Sam Howell's 6-yard touchdown run in the fourth quarter was the biggest swing of the game. Sam Howell's 6-yard touchdown run then put them ahead for good.
Which team won the turnover battle in Cardinals vs Commanders?
The Cardinals won the turnover battle 3–2: the Commanders gave the ball away 3 times and the Cardinals 2 times. The Commanders won the game anyway.
What is the all-time Cardinals vs Commanders record?
The Commanders lead the all-time series 78–47–2 across 127 meetings since 1932.
When did the Cardinals and Commanders last play before this game?
Before Week 1 of 2023, they last met in the 2020 season on September 20, 2020, when the Cardinals beat the Commanders 30–15.
What was the closing spread for Cardinals vs Commanders?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Commanders −7, making the Washington Commanders 7-point favorites, with a closing total of 38. That implied about 22.5 points for the Commanders and 15.5 for the Cardinals.
Did Cardinals vs Commanders go over or under the total?
The game went under. The consensus closing total was 38, and the teams combined for 36 points, 2 under the number.
Who covered the spread in Cardinals vs Commanders?
The Cardinals covered as 7-point underdogs against the closing line of Commanders −7. The final margin was 4 points.
