Final2026 Week 4
Soldier Field, Chicago, IL|
Chicago Bears vs New York Jets
New York Jets
Away
12
Chicago Bears
HomeWon
23
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jets | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 12 |
| Bears | 7 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 23 |
NYJ 12 · CHI 23 Final
Passing leader
CHI · QB
9.8PPR pts
25/34, 268 YDS, 1 INT
Top fantasy scorer
CHI · RB
28.0PPR pts
30 ATT, 146 YDS, 2 TD, 1 REC, 4 REC YDS
Jets leader
NYJ · WR
15.3PPR pts
2 REC, 73 YDS, 1 TD
Defensive playmaker
Minkah Fitzpatrick
NYJ
1 INT, 16 TKL
Bears 23, Jets 12: Chicago beats New York
Chicago led 13–3 at halftime and outscored New York 10–9 after the break to win 23–12. The Bears finished with a 492–157 edge in total offense and averaged 5.5 yards per play.
The Jets went 0-for-7 on third down, while the Bears kept the ball for 42:45.
Key advantages
- +0.6 yards/play CHI 5.5 · NYJ 4.9
- +335 total yards CHI 492 · NYJ 157
- +47% third-down rate CHI 47% · NYJ 0%
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Jet or Bear on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Bears Won
Chicago won the efficiency, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Jets | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 4.9 | Yards per play | 5.5 |
| 157 | Total yards | 492 |
| 0% | Third-down conversion | 47% |
| Other team stats | ||
| 32 | Plays | 89 |
| 0 | Turnovers | 2 |
| 17:15 | Time of possession | 42:45 |
Scoring Summary
The Bears scored two touchdowns and three field goals; the Jets scored one touchdown and two field goals.
| Time | Team | Play | NYJ | CHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 0:23 | CHI | Kyle Monangai 1-yard TD run Takes leadCairo Santos XP | 0 | 7 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 8:15 | NYJ | Jason Sanders 36-yard FG | 3 | 7 |
| 2:29 | CHI | Cairo Santos 30-yard FG Extends lead | 3 | 10 |
| 0:00 | CHI | Cairo Santos 30-yard FG Extends lead | 3 | 13 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 7:00 | NYJ | Jason Sanders 30-yard FG | 6 | 13 |
| 2:26 | CHI | Kyle Monangai 5-yard TD run Extends leadCairo Santos XP | 6 | 20 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 10:01 | CHI | Cairo Santos 21-yard FG Extends lead | 6 | 23 |
| 9:16 | NYJ | Geno Smith → Isaiah Williams, 58-yard TDXP missed | 12 | 23 |
Fantasy Points: Jets vs Bears, Week 4 2026
Fantasy leaders
- Kyle MonangaiCHI · RB28.0 PTSRB4
- Rome OdunzeCHI · WR15.4 PTSWR21
- Isaiah WilliamsNYJ · WR15.3 PTSWR22
- Colston LovelandCHI · TE11.7 PTSTE15
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.8 | QB29 | 25/34 | 268 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 83.9 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.8 | QB31 | 8/15 | 119 | 1 | 0 | - | - | - | 101.8 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28.0 | RB4 | RB | 30 | 146 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 15.4 | WR21 | WR | - | - | - | 7 | 6 | 94 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 15.3 | WR22 | WR | - | - | - | 3 | 2 | 73 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 11.7 | TE15 | TE | - | - | - | 9 | 6 | 57 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 11.4 | WR39 | WR | 1 | 11 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 63 | 0 | ||
| 8.7 | RB33 | RB | 14 | 59 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.4 | RB37 | RB | 15 | 58 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.7 | WR70 | WR | - | - | - | 4 | 3 | 27 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.3 | RB53 | RB | 4 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.3 | TE36 | TE | - | - | - | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.6 | WR88 | WR | - | - | - | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.1 | TE46 | TE | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | ||
| 1.8 | TE51 | TE | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | - | TE | - | - | - | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | - | WR | - | - | - | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fantasy Usage
New York Jets
Snap Share
Garrett WilsonWR32 snaps100%
Braelon AllenRB30 snaps94%
Isaiah WilliamsWR30 snaps94%
Kenyon SadiqTE22 snaps69%
Sterling ShepardWR17 snaps53%
Target Share15 targets
- Garrett Wilson27%, 4 targets
- Kenyon Sadiq27%, 4 targets
- Isaiah Williams20%, 3 targets
- Braelon Allen13%, 2 targets
- Sterling Shepard7%, 1 targets
- Other7%, 1 targets
Carry Share14 carries
- Braelon Allen100%, 14 carries
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Colston LovelandTE86 snaps92%
Rome OdunzeWR83 snaps89%
Cole KmetTE68 snaps73%
Luther BurdenWR52 snaps56%
Kyle MonangaiRB50 snaps54%
Target Share31 targets
- Colston Loveland29%, 9 targets
- Rome Odunze23%, 7 targets
- Luther Burden19%, 6 targets
- Kalif Raymond6%, 2 targets
- D'Andre Swift6%, 2 targets
- Other16%, 5 targets
Carry Share54 carries
- Kyle Monangai56%, 30 carries
- D'Andre Swift28%, 15 carries
- Roschon Johnson7%, 4 carries
- Tyson Bagent7%, 4 carries
- Luther Burden2%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32 | 100% | 4 | 27% | 0 | |
| 30 | 94% | 2 | 13% | 14 | |
| 30 | 94% | 3 | 20% | 0 | |
| 86 | 92% | 9 | 29% | 0 | |
| 83 | 89% | 7 | 23% | 0 | |
| 68 | 73% | 2 | 6% | 0 | |
| 22 | 69% | 4 | 27% | 0 | |
| 52 | 56% | 6 | 19% | 1 | |
| 50 | 54% | 1 | 3% | 30 | |
| 17 | 53% | 1 | 7% | 0 | |
| 47 | 51% | 2 | 6% | 0 | |
| 14 | 44% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 12 | 38% | 1 | 7% | 0 | |
| 33 | 35% | 2 | 6% | 15 | |
| 23 | 25% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 10 | 11% | 1 | 3% | 4 | |
| 9 | 10% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 2 | 6% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 3% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 2 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+10.1Isaiah Williams15.3 PTS vs 5.2 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−8.2Tyson Bagent9.8 PTS vs 18.0 xFP
- Highest expected volume20.5 xFPKyle Monangai28.0 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle MonangaiCHI · RB | 28.0 | 20.5 | +7.5 | 54% | 56% car | - | 0 | 30 | 56% | 1 | 3% |
| Tyson BagentCHI · QB | 9.8 | 18.0 | −8.2 | 100% | 34 att | - | 34 | 4 | 7% | 0 | 0% |
| Colston LovelandCHI · TE | 11.7 | 15.5 | −3.8 | 92% | 29% tgt | - | 0 | 0 | 0% | 9 | 29% |
| D'Andre SwiftCHI · RB | 7.4 | 12.9 | −5.5 | 35% | 28% car | - | 0 | 15 | 28% | 2 | 6% |
| Braelon AllenNYJ · RB | 8.7 | 12.2 | −3.5 | 94% | 100% car | - | 0 | 14 | 100% | 2 | 13% |
| Rome OdunzeCHI · WR | 15.4 | 12.1 | +3.3 | 89% | 23% tgt | - | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 23% |
| Luther Burden IIICHI · WR | 11.4 | 11.0 | +0.4 | 56% | 19% tgt | - | 0 | 1 | 2% | 6 | 19% |
| Garrett WilsonNYJ · WR | 5.7 | 6.9 | −1.2 | 100% | 27% tgt | - | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 27% |
| Kenyon SadiqNYJ · TE | 0.0 | 6.9 | −6.9 | 69% | 27% tgt | - | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 27% |
| Geno SmithNYJ · QB | 8.8 | 6.8 | +2.0 | 100% | 15 att | - | 15 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Isaiah WilliamsNYJ · WR | 15.3 | 5.2 | +10.1 | 94% | 20% tgt | - | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 20% |
| Roschon JohnsonCHI · RB | 3.3 | 4.2 | −0.9 | 11% | 7% car | - | 0 | 4 | 7% | 1 | 3% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 3.3 | 3.5 | −0.2 | 73% | 6% tgt | - | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
| Kalif RaymondCHI · WR | 2.6 | 3.5 | −0.9 | 51% | 6% tgt | - | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
| Jelani WoodsNYJ · TE | 2.1 | 1.7 | +0.4 | 38% | 7% tgt | - | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 7% |
| Sam RoushCHI · TE | 1.8 | 1.7 | +0.1 | 25% | 3% tgt | - | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Sterling ShepardNYJ · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 53% | 7% tgt | - | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 7% |
Team totals: Jets 15 targets and 14 carries; Bears 31 targets and 54 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2026 season: 1.73 PPR points per target (68% catch rate), 0.63 per carry and 0.45 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Geno Smith
NYJ · QB · 8.8 pts on 6.8 expected
8 of 15 passing for 119 yards, 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 6.8 expected. Next up: Week 5 against the Browns. Bet on the role more than the result.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 9.3, 15.6, 26.0, 8.8
W1W2W3W4
Lowest-scoring game of the season.
Tyson Bagent Unlucky
CHI · QB · 9.8 pts on 18.0 expected
25 of 34 passing for 268 yards, 1 interception; 4 carries for 1 yard.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 18.0 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't. Next up: Week 5 against the Packers. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Tyson Bagent →Braelon Allen Volume, no payoff
NYJ · RB · 8.7 pts on 12.2 expected
2 targets (13% of the team's), 2 catches for 8 yards; 14 carries (100% of the team's) for 59 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 12.2 expected. Next up: Week 5 against the Browns. Bet on the role more than the result.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 4.0, 8.5, 4.7, 8.7
W1W2W3W4
Season high in carries (14). Best fantasy game of the season.
Garrett Wilson
NYJ · WR · 5.7 pts on 6.9 expected
4 targets (27% of the team's), 3 catches for 27 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 6.9 expected. Next up: Week 5 against the Browns. Bet on the role more than the result.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 13.9, 16.7, 26.7, 5.7
W1W2W3W4
Lowest-scoring game of the season.
Kyle Monangai Ran hot
CHI · RB · 28.0 pts on 20.5 expected
1 target (3% of the team's), 1 catch for 4 yards; 30 carries (56% of the team's) for 146 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 20.5 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 5 against the Packers. Bet on the role more than the result.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 20.4, 7.8, 3.1, 28.0
W1W2W3W4
Season high in carries (30). Best fantasy game of the season.
Colston Loveland
CHI · TE · 11.7 pts on 15.5 expected
9 targets (29% of the team's), 6 catches for 57 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 15.5 expected. Next up: Week 5 against the Packers. Bet on the role more than the result.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 0.0, 1.3, 7.1, 11.7
W1W2W3W4
Season high in targets (9). Best fantasy game of the season.
D'Andre Swift Unlucky
CHI · RB · 7.4 pts on 12.9 expected
2 targets (6% of the team's), 2 catches for 16 yards; 15 carries (28% of the team's) for 58 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 12.9 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't. Next up: Week 5 against the Packers. Bet on the role more than the result.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 32.4, 12.9, 10.8, 7.4
W1W2W3W4
Lowest-scoring game of the season.
Kenyon Sadiq Unlucky
NYJ · TE · 0.0 pts on 6.9 expected
4 targets (27% of the team's), 0 catches for 0 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 6.9 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't. Next up: Week 5 against the Browns. Bet on the role more than the result.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 11.4, 3.7, 23.5, 0.0
W1W2W3W4
Lowest-scoring game of the season.
Start/Sit Decisions
Stock Up, Stock Down
New York Jets
- ▲Stock up: Braelon Allen played 94% of the snaps, up from a 41% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Kenyon Sadiq played 69% of the snaps, up from a 45% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Isaiah Williams played 94% of the snaps, up from a 77% season average.
Chicago Bears
- ▲Stock up: Kyle Monangai led the backfield with 54% of the snaps after trailing D'Andre Swift before this game.
- ▲Stock up: Rome Odunze played 89% of the snaps, up from a 72% season average.
- ▼Stock down: D'Andre Swift lost the backfield lead: 35% of the snaps to Kyle Monangai's 54%.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2026 through Week 4.
| Points allowed to | Jets D | Bears D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 13.7 | 15.6 |
| RBs | 27.3 | 16.9 |
| WRs | 28.0 | 24.9 |
| TEs | 10.2 | 6.7 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Chicago opened at 60% win probability and passed 98% in the third quarter on the way to the win.
Bears win probability
Key Swings
- +21Monangai 1-yd TD run59% → 79%Q1 0:23
- −9Sanders 36-yd FG80% → 72%Q2 8:15
- +9Santos 30-yd FG72% → 81%Q2 2:29
- +7Santos 30-yd FG82% → 89%Q2 0:00
- +12Monangai 5-yd TD run86% → 98%Q3 2:26
Swing in Bears win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| New York Jets | Measure | Chicago Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 32 | Plays | 89 |
| 56% | Pass rate | 39% |
| 5.4 | Yds / dropback | 7.4 |
| 4.2 | Yds / carry | 4.3 |
| 0/7 | Third downs | 7/15 |
Efficiency edge Chicago ran 57 more plays and gained 2.0 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- NYJ Wilson 27% · Sadiq 27% · Williams 20%
- CHI Loveland 29% · Odunze 23% · Burden 19%
Possession Results
| Result | NYJ | CHI |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 1 | 2 |
| Field goals | 2 | 3 |
| Punts | 5 | 0 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 2 |
| Turnovers on downs | 0 | 1 |
NYJ turnover edge: +2
- The Bears opened the scoring on their second possession, a 12-play, 57-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
- The Bears drained the clock with three second-half drives of four to ten minutes.
All 17 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 14 | 93 | 5:48 | Downs |
| NYJ | Q1 9:12 | 3 | 4 | 1:48 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 7:24 | 12 | 57 | 7:01 | Touchdown |
| NYJ | Q1 0:23 | 5 | -2 | 2:06 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 13:17 | 3 | 12 | 1:35 | Interception |
| NYJ | Q2 11:42 | 6 | 16 | 3:27 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q2 8:15 | 11 | 59 | 5:46 | Field goal |
| NYJ | Q2 2:29 | 3 | 6 | 0:45 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 1:44 | 11 | 68 | 1:44 | Field goal |
| NYJ | Q3 15:00 | 7 | 24 | 5:09 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 9:51 | 3 | 24 | 1:05 | Fumble |
| NYJ | Q3 8:46 | 5 | 16 | 1:46 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q3 7:00 | 9 | 72 | 4:34 | Touchdown |
| NYJ | Q3 2:26 | 3 | 6 | 1:29 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 0:57 | 11 | 77 | 5:56 | Field goal |
| NYJ | Q4 10:01 | 2 | 72 | 0:45 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q4 9:16 | 18 | 76 | 9:16 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Jets vs Bears Head-to-Head
The Jets and Bears first met in 1974 and have played 14 times since.
- All-time series
- 10–4Bears lead, 14 meetings since 1974
- Postseason
- 0No playoff meetings
- Largest Jets win
- 31–102022
- Largest Bears win
- 24–102018
Since 2021
1–1 Series tied
2 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- J
- B
Oldest to newest. J = Jets win, B = Bears win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2026 Wk 4 Jets at Bears CHI 23 NYJ 12 CHI W
- 2022 Wk 12 Bears at Jets, 2022 Wk 12 recap NYJ 31 CHI 10 NYJ W
Season to Date (Through Week 4)
The 2026 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Jets | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 1-3 | Record | 3-1 |
| 19.0 | Points per game | 28.0 |
| 286.0 | Yards per game | 429.0 |
| 5.0 | Yards per play | 5.8 |
| 21.0 | Points allowed per game | 16.3 |
| 316.8 | Yards allowed per game | 282.3 |
Jets vs Bears Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- CHI −3.5Bears covered by 7.5
- Total
- 43.5Under: 35 points scored (by 8.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bears | 23.5 | 23 | −0.5 |
| Jets | 20.0 | 12 | −8.0 |
Both offenses finished under the market's expectation, which matches the low fantasy output in the Fantasy tab.
Betting Trends
Last 2 meetings: Jets 1–1 ATS, overs and unders 1–1.
Each team's 2026 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
New York Jets
- Against the spread
- 2–1–1
- Over/under
- 1–3
- ATS as underdog
- 2–1–1
- ATS on the road
- 1–1–1
Chicago Bears
- Against the spread
- 3–1
- Over/under
- 1–3
- ATS as favorite
- 2–1
- ATS as underdog
- 1–0
- ATS at home
- 2–1
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Jets and Bears in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Jet or a Bear, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Jets or Bears player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Jets and Bears players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Jets and Bears defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2026 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Jets vs Bears Game FAQ
Who won the 2026 Jets vs Bears Week 4 game?
The Chicago Bears beat the New York Jets 23–12 in Week 4 of the 2026 season. The game was played at Soldier Field in Chicago, IL, on October 4, 2026. See the Bears' 2026 schedule.
What was the final score of Jets vs Bears?
The final score was Bears 23, Jets 12. The Bears led 13–3 at halftime, and the second half went Jets 9, Bears 10.
What happened in the Jets vs Bears game?
Chicago led 13–3 at halftime and outscored New York 10–9 after the break to win 23–12. The Bears finished with a 492–157 edge in total offense and averaged 5.5 yards per play. Kyle Monangai led all players with a catch for 4 yards, plus 30 carries for 146 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. The Bears committed 2 turnovers, the Jets none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Jets vs Bears?
Kyle Monangai led the game with 28.0 PPR fantasy points, the RB4 of Week 4, on a catch for 4 yards, plus 30 carries for 146 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. Rome Odunze was next with 15.4 (WR21). See Kyle Monangai's 2026 game log.
Who led Jets vs Bears in passing, rushing and receiving?
Tyson Bagent (CHI) led all passers with 25 of 34 for 268 yards and an interception. Kyle Monangai (CHI) led in rushing with 30 carries for 146 yards and 2 touchdowns. Rome Odunze (CHI) led in receiving with 6 catches for 94 yards.
How many fantasy points did Kyle Monangai score against the Jets?
Kyle Monangai scored 28.0 points in PPR leagues, 27.5 in half-PPR and 27.0 in standard scoring against the Jets in Week 4 of the 2026 season, on a catch for 4 yards, plus 30 carries for 146 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. He handled 56% of his team's carries.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Jets vs Bears?
Isaiah Williams outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 15.3 PPR points on 5.2 xFP (+10.1). Tyson Bagent fell furthest short, with 9.8 points on 18.0 xFP (−8.2). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Jets vs Bears?
Kyle Monangai had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 20.5 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 28.0. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Bears beat the Jets?
The Bears beat the Jets 23–12 because they averaged 5.5 yards per play to 4.9 and outgained them 492–157.
Which team won the turnover battle in Jets vs Bears?
The Jets won the turnover battle 2–0: the Bears gave the ball away 2 times and the Jets not at all. The Bears won the game anyway.
What is the all-time Jets vs Bears record?
The Bears lead the all-time series 10–4 across 14 meetings since 1974.
When did the Jets and Bears last play before this game?
Before Week 4 of 2026, they last met in the 2022 season on November 27, 2022, when the Jets beat the Bears 31–10.
What was the closing spread for Jets vs Bears?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Bears −3.5, making the Chicago Bears 3.5-point favorites, with a closing total of 43.5. That implied about 23.5 points for the Bears and 20.0 for the Jets.
Did Jets vs Bears go over or under the total?
The game went under. The consensus closing total was 43.5, and the teams combined for 35 points, 8.5 under the number.
Who covered the spread in Jets vs Bears?
The Bears covered by 7.5 against the closing line of Bears −3.5. The final margin was 11 points.
