Chicago Bears vs Philadelphia Eagles
Philadelphia Eagles
Away
7
Chicago Bears
HomeWon
27
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eagles | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Bears | 7 | 3 | 10 | 7 | 27 |
PHI 7CHI 27 Final
Passing leader
24.5PPR pts
24/34, 247 YDS, 2 TD, 1 RUSH TD
Top fantasy scorer
21.0PPR pts
6 REC, 90 YDS, 1 TD
Eagles leader
13.6PPR pts
16/25, 153 YDS, 1 INT, 1 RUSH TD
Defensive playmaker
Dillon Thieneman
1 INT, 6 TKL
Bears 27, Eagles 7: Chicago leads from start to finish
Chicago led 10–7 at halftime and outscored Philadelphia 17–0 after the break to win 27–7. The Bears finished with a 375–248 edge in total offense and averaged 5.4 yards per play.
The gap showed up everywhere. The Eagles went 2-for-9 on third down and committed three turnovers, while the Bears kept the ball for 36:53 and finished without a giveaway.
Key advantages
- +0.1 yards/play CHI 5.4 · PHI 5.3
- +3 turnover margin CHI 0 turnovers
- +127 total yards CHI 375 · PHI 248
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Eagle or Bear on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Bears Won
Chicago won the efficiency, turnover, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Eagles | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 | Yards per play | 5.4 |
| 3 | Turnovers | 0 |
| 248 | Total yards | 375 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 47 | Plays | 69 |
| 22% | Third-down conversion | 38% |
| 23:07 | Time of possession | 36:53 |
Scoring Summary
The Bears scored three touchdowns and two field goals; the Eagles scored one touchdown.
| Time | Team | Play | PHI | CHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 8:47 | CHI | Case Keenum → Luther Burden III, 8-yard TD Takes leadCairo Santos XP | 0 | 7 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 1:52 | CHI | Cairo Santos 29-yard FG Extends lead | 0 | 10 |
| 0:00 | PHI | Jalen Hurts 1-yard TD runJake Elliott XP | 7 | 10 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 10:17 | CHI | Cairo Santos 48-yard FG Extends lead | 7 | 13 |
| 5:47 | CHI | Case Keenum → Kalif Raymond, 41-yard TD Extends leadCairo Santos XP | 7 | 20 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 7:19 | CHI | Case Keenum 1-yard TD run Extends leadCairo Santos XP | 7 | 27 |
Fantasy Points: Eagles vs Bears, Week 3 2026
Fantasy leaders
- Case Keenum24.5 PTSQB7
- Kalif Raymond21.0 PTSWR7
- Luther Burden19.8 PTSWR13
- Jalen Hurts13.6 PTSQB24
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case Keenum | 24.5 | QB7 | 24/34 | 247 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 110.8 | Start/Sit → |
| Jalen Hurts | 13.6 | QB24 | 16/25 | 153 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 25 | 1 | 64.3 | Start/Sit → |
| Andy Dalton | -1.0 | — | 0/1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | 0.0 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kalif Raymond | 21.0 | WR7 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 6 | 90 | 1 | Start/Sit → |
| Luther Burden | 19.8 | WR13 | WR | 1 | 7 | 0 | 11 | 7 | 61 | 1 | |
| DeVonta Smith | 12.5 | WR32 | WR | — | — | — | 8 | 6 | 65 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| D'Andre Swift | 10.8 | RB22 | RB | 20 | 84 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Saquon Barkley | 9.0 | RB30 | RB | 15 | 82 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -2 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Rome Odunze | 7.4 | WR60 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 3 | 44 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Colston Loveland | 7.1 | TE27 | TE | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 31 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Makai Lemon | 5.9 | WR69 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 29 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Dontayvion Wicks | 5.2 | WR73 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 2 | 32 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Kyle Monangai | 3.1 | RB53 | RB | 10 | 31 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → |
| Sam Roush | 2.6 | TE48 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Will Shipley | 2.1 | RB63 | RB | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 11 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Zach Ertz | 1.9 | TE50 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 9 | 0 | |
| Johnny Mundt | 1.4 | TE59 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Zavion Thomas | 1.1 | WR114 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Cole Kmet | 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Tank Bigsby | -0.5 | — | RB | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Philadelphia Eagles
Snap Share
Target Share25 targets
- DeVonta Smith32%, 8 targets
- Dontayvion Wicks20%, 5 targets
- Makai Lemon16%, 4 targets
- Zach Ertz8%, 2 targets
- Saquon Barkley8%, 2 targets
- Other16%, 4 targets
Carry Share19 carries
- , 15 carries
- , 4 carries
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Target Share34 targets
- Luther Burden32%, 11 targets
- Kalif Raymond21%, 7 targets
- Rome Odunze18%, 6 targets
- Colston Loveland12%, 4 targets
- D'Andre Swift9%, 3 targets
- Other9%, 3 targets
Carry Share35 carries
- , 20 carries
- , 10 carries
- , 4 carries
- , 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeVonta Smith | 50 | 100% | 8 | 32% | 0 |
| Dontayvion Wicks | 44 | 88% | 5 | 20% | 0 |
| Rome Odunze | 61 | 85% | 6 | 18% | 0 |
| Colston Loveland | 57 | 79% | 4 | 12% | 0 |
| Kalif Raymond | 54 | 75% | 7 | 21% | 0 |
| Saquon Barkley | 36 | 72% | 2 | 8% | 15 |
| Makai Lemon | 35 | 70% | 4 | 16% | 0 |
| D'Andre Swift | 50 | 69% | 3 | 9% | 20 |
| Luther Burden | 44 | 61% | 11 | 32% | 1 |
| Cole Kmet | 43 | 60% | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| Johnny Mundt | 26 | 52% | 1 | 4% | 0 |
| Zach Ertz | 19 | 38% | 2 | 8% | 0 |
| Kyle Monangai | 22 | 31% | 0 | 0% | 10 |
| E.J. Jenkins | 13 | 26% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
| Will Shipley | 13 | 26% | 2 | 8% | 0 |
| Sam Roush | 16 | 22% | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| Elijah Moore | 6 | 12% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
| Zavion Thomas | 8 | 11% | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| Darius Cooper | 5 | 10% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
| Jahdae Walker | 4 | 6% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
| Tank Bigsby | 2 | 4% | 1 | 4% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+8.8Kalif Raymond21.0 PTS vs 12.2 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−6.5D'Andre Swift10.8 PTS vs 17.3 xFP
- Highest expected volume19.8 xFPLuther Burden III19.8 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luther Burden IIICHI · WR | 19.8 | 19.8 | 0.0 | 61% | 32% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 11 | 32% |
| Case KeenumCHI · QB | 24.5 | 18.3 | +6.2 | 100% | 34 att | — | 34 | 4 | 11% | 0 | 0% |
| D'Andre SwiftCHI · RB | 10.8 | 17.3 | −6.5 | 69% | 57% car | — | 0 | 20 | 57% | 3 | 9% |
| Jalen HurtsPHI · QB | 13.6 | 14.1 | −0.5 | 92% | 25 att | — | 25 | 4 | 21% | 0 | 0% |
| DeVonta SmithPHI · WR | 12.5 | 14.0 | −1.5 | 100% | 32% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 32% |
| Saquon BarkleyPHI · RB | 9.0 | 12.5 | −3.5 | 72% | 79% car | — | 0 | 15 | 79% | 2 | 8% |
| Kalif RaymondCHI · WR | 21.0 | 12.2 | +8.8 | 75% | 21% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 21% |
| Rome OdunzeCHI · WR | 7.4 | 10.5 | −3.1 | 85% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 18% |
| Dontayvion WicksPHI · WR | 5.2 | 8.7 | −3.5 | 88% | 20% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 20% |
| Colston LovelandCHI · TE | 7.1 | 7.0 | +0.1 | 79% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 12% |
| Makai LemonPHI · WR | 5.9 | 7.0 | −1.1 | 70% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 16% |
| Kyle MonangaiCHI · RB | 3.1 | 6.0 | −2.9 | 31% | 29% car | — | 0 | 10 | 29% | 0 | 0% |
| Will ShipleyPHI · RB | 2.1 | 3.5 | −1.4 | 26% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 8% |
| Zach ErtzPHI · TE | 1.9 | 3.5 | −1.6 | 38% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 8% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 60% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Johnny MundtPHI · TE | 1.4 | 1.7 | −0.3 | 52% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Sam RoushCHI · TE | 2.6 | 1.7 | +0.9 | 22% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Tank BigsbyPHI · RB | -0.5 | 1.7 | −2.2 | 4% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Zavion ThomasCHI · WR | 1.1 | 1.7 | −0.6 | 11% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Andy DaltonPHI · QB | -1.0 | 0.5 | −1.5 | 8% | 1 att | — | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Eagles 25 targets and 19 carries; Bears 34 targets and 35 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2026 season: 1.75 PPR points per target (68% catch rate), 0.60 per carry and 0.47 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Jalen Hurts
16 of 25 passing for 153 yards, 1 interception; 4 carries for 25 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 14.1 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Rams. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Jalen Hurts →Case Keenum Ran hot
24 of 34 passing for 247 yards, 2 touchdowns; 4 carries for 6 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 18.3 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 4 against the Jets. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Case Keenum →DeVonta Smith Volume, no payoff
8 targets (32% of the team's), 6 catches for 65 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 14.0 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Rams. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: DeVonta Smith →Saquon Barkley Volume, no payoff
2 targets (8% of the team's), 1 catch for -2 yards; 15 carries (79% of the team's) for 82 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 12.5 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Rams. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Saquon Barkley →Luther Burden III Strong role
11 targets (32% of the team's), 7 catches for 61 yards and 1 touchdown; 1 carry (3% of the team's) for 7 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 19.8 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Jets. Bet on the role more than the result.
Trend: Season high in targets (11).
D'Andre Swift Unlucky
3 targets (9% of the team's), 2 catches for 4 yards; 20 carries (57% of the team's) for 84 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 17.3 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't. Next up: Week 4 against the Jets. Bet on the role more than the result.
Trend: Season high in carries (20).
Kalif Raymond Ran hot
7 targets (21% of the team's), 6 catches for 90 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 12.2 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 4 against the Jets. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Kalif Raymond →Tank Bigsby
1 target (4% of the team's), 1 catch for 5 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 1.7 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Rams. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Tank Bigsby →Start/Sit Decisions
Stock Up, Stock Down
Philadelphia Eagles
- Stock up: Saquon Barkley played 72% of the snaps, up from a 43% season average.
- Stock down: Tank Bigsby played 4% of the snaps, down from a 23% season average.
Chicago Bears
- Stock up: Rome Odunze played 85% of the snaps, up from a 66% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2026 through Week 3.
| Points allowed to | Eagles D | Bears D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 20.7 | 17.9 |
| RBs | 16.8 | 19.7 |
| WRs | 30.5 | 26.2 |
| TEs | 6.6 | 8.3 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Chicago opened at 41% win probability and passed 98% in the fourth quarter on the way to the win.
Bears win probability
Key Swings
- +22Keenum → Burden, 8-yd TD42% → 63%Q1 8:47
- +9Santos 29-yd FG71% → 80%Q2 1:52
- −25Hurts 1-yd TD run81% → 56%Q2 0:00
- +13Santos 48-yd FG58% → 71%Q3 10:17
- +20Keenum → Raymond, 41-yd TD73% → 93%Q3 5:47
Swing in Bears win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Philadelphia Eagles | Measure | Chicago Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 47 | Plays | 69 |
| 60% | Pass rate | 49% |
| 5.0 | Yds / dropback | 7.3 |
| 5.6 | Yds / carry | 3.7 |
| 2/9 | Third downs | 5/13 |
Efficiency edge Chicago ran 22 more plays and gained 2.3 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- PHI Smith 32% · Wicks 20% · Lemon 16%
- CHI Burden 32% · Raymond 21% · Odunze 18%
Possession Results
| Result | PHI | CHI |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 1 | 3 |
| Field goals | 0 | 2 |
| Punts | 4 | 2 |
| Turnovers | 3 | 0 |
| Turnovers on downs | 1 | 1 |
CHI turnover edge: +3
- The Bears opened the scoring on their first possession, a 11-play, 66-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
- The Bears drained the clock with two second-half drives of five to nine minutes.
All 18 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 11 | 66 | 6:13 | Touchdown |
| PHI | Q1 8:47 | 5 | 29 | 2:38 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 6:09 | 7 | 34 | 4:18 | Punt |
| PHI | Q1 1:51 | 2 | -5 | 0:47 | Fumble |
| CHI | Q1 1:04 | 6 | 12 | 2:05 | Downs |
| PHI | Q2 13:59 | 12 | 95 | 7:45 | Interception |
| CHI | Q2 6:14 | 11 | 69 | 4:22 | Field goal |
| PHI | Q2 1:52 | 8 | 67 | 1:52 | Touchdown |
| PHI | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 5 | 1:32 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 13:28 | 7 | 38 | 3:11 | Field goal |
| PHI | Q3 10:17 | 3 | -2 | 1:41 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 8:36 | 5 | 71 | 2:49 | Touchdown |
| PHI | Q3 5:47 | 3 | 4 | 2:35 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 3:12 | 3 | -2 | 0:39 | Punt |
| PHI | Q3 2:33 | 5 | 24 | 2:10 | Interception |
| CHI | Q3 0:23 | 13 | 58 | 8:04 | Touchdown |
| PHI | Q4 7:19 | 6 | 21 | 2:07 | Downs |
| CHI | Q4 5:12 | 8 | 40 | 5:12 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Eagles vs Bears Head-to-Head
The Eagles and Bears first met in 1933 and have played 50 times since.
- All-time series
- 32–17–1Bears lead, 50 meetings since 1933
- Postseason
- 3–1Split 3–1
- Largest Eagles win
- 54–112013
- Largest Bears win
- 39–01935
Since 2021
2–1 Bears lead
3 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
Oldest to newest. B = Bears win, E = Eagles win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2026 Wk 3 Eagles at Bears CHI 27 PHI 7 CHI W
- 2025 Wk 13 Bears at Eagles, 2025 Wk 13 recap CHI 24 PHI 15 CHI W
- 2022 Wk 15 Eagles at Bears, 2022 Wk 15 recap PHI 25 CHI 20 PHI W
Season to Date (Through Week 3)
The 2026 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Eagles | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 2-1 | Record | 2-1 |
| 18.3 | Points per game | 29.7 |
| 302.3 | Yards per game | 408.0 |
| 5.3 | Yards per play | 5.9 |
| 23.0 | Points allowed per game | 17.7 |
| 320.3 | Yards allowed per game | 324.0 |
Eagles vs Bears Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- PHI −3Eagles failed to cover by 23
- Total
- 42.5Under: 34 points scored (by 8.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eagles | 22.8 | 7 | −15.8 |
| Bears | 19.8 | 27 | +7.3 |
The Bears beat their implied total and the Eagles fell short of theirs; the Fantasy tab has the player lines behind it.
Betting Trends
Last 3 meetings: Bears 3–0 ATS, unders 3–0.
Each team's 2026 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Philadelphia Eagles
- Against the spread
- 0–3
- Over/under
- 2–1
- ATS as favorite
- 0–3
- ATS on the road
- 0–2
Chicago Bears
- Against the spread
- 2–1
- Over/under
- 1–2
- ATS as favorite
- 1–1
- ATS as underdog
- 1–0
- ATS at home
- 1–1
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Eagles and Bears in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Eagle or a Bear, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Eagles or Bears player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Eagles and Bears players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Eagles and Bears defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2026 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Eagles vs Bears Game FAQ
Who won the 2026 Eagles vs Bears Week 3 game?
The Chicago Bears beat the Philadelphia Eagles 27–7 in Week 3 of the 2026 season. The game was played at Soldier Field in Chicago, IL, on September 28, 2026. See the Bears' 2026 schedule.
What was the final score of Eagles vs Bears?
The final score was Bears 27, Eagles 7. The Bears led 10–7 at halftime, and the second half went Eagles 0, Bears 17.
What happened in the Eagles vs Bears game?
Chicago led 10–7 at halftime and outscored Philadelphia 17–0 after the break to win 27–7. The Bears finished with a 375–248 edge in total offense and averaged 5.4 yards per play. Case Keenum led all players with 24 of 34 passing for 247 yards and 2 touchdowns, plus 4 carries for 6 rushing yards and a touchdown. The Eagles committed 3 turnovers, the Bears none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Eagles vs Bears?
Case Keenum led the game with 24.5 PPR fantasy points, the QB7 of Week 3, on 24 of 34 passing for 247 yards and 2 touchdowns, plus 4 carries for 6 rushing yards and a touchdown. Kalif Raymond was next with 21.0 (WR7). See Case Keenum's 2026 game log.
Who led Eagles vs Bears in passing, rushing and receiving?
Case Keenum (CHI) led all passers with 24 of 34 for 247 yards and 2 touchdowns. D'Andre Swift (CHI) led in rushing with 20 carries for 84 yards. Kalif Raymond (CHI) led in receiving with 6 catches for 90 yards and a touchdown.
How many fantasy points did Case Keenum score against the Eagles?
Case Keenum scored 24.5 fantasy points against the Eagles in Week 3 of the 2026 season, the same in PPR, half-PPR and standard scoring because he had no catches, on 24 of 34 passing for 247 yards and 2 touchdowns, plus 4 carries for 6 rushing yards and a touchdown.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Eagles vs Bears?
Kalif Raymond outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 21.0 PPR points on 12.2 xFP (+8.8). D'Andre Swift fell furthest short, with 10.8 points on 17.3 xFP (−6.5). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
How did the Bears beat the Eagles?
The Bears beat the Eagles 27–7 because they averaged 5.4 yards per play to 5.3, won the turnover battle 3–0, and outgained them 375–248.
Which team won the turnover battle in Eagles vs Bears?
The Bears won the turnover battle 3–0: the Eagles gave the ball away 3 times and the Bears not at all. The Bears won the game.
What is the all-time Eagles vs Bears record?
The Bears lead the all-time series 32–17–1 across 50 meetings since 1933, including a 1–3 record in the postseason.
When did the Eagles and Bears last play before this game?
Before Week 3 of 2026, they last met in the 2025 season on November 28, 2025, when the Bears beat the Eagles 24–15.
Have the Eagles and Bears met in the playoffs?
Yes, 4 times, most recently in the 2018 playoffs. The Eagles are 3–1 against the Bears in the postseason.
What was the closing spread for Eagles vs Bears?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Eagles −3, making the Philadelphia Eagles 3-point favorites, with a closing total of 42.5. That implied about 22.8 points for the Eagles and 19.8 for the Bears.
Did Eagles vs Bears go over or under the total?
The game went under. The consensus closing total was 42.5, and the teams combined for 34 points, 8.5 under the number.
Who covered the spread in Eagles vs Bears?
The Bears covered as 3-point underdogs against the closing line of Eagles −3. The final margin was 20 points.