Final2023 Week 3
Paycor Stadium, Cincinnati, OH|
Los Angeles Rams vs Cincinnati Bengals, Week 3 2023
Los Angeles Rams
Away
16
Cincinnati Bengals
HomeWon
19
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rams | 3 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 16 |
| Bengals | 0 | 6 | 10 | 3 | 19 |
LAR 16 · CIN 19 Final
Passing leader
LAR · QB
13.5PPR pts
18/33, 269 YDS, 1 TD, 2 INT
Top fantasy scorer
CIN · WR
26.1PPR pts
12 REC, 141 YDS
Rams leader
LAR · WR
17.2PPR pts
4 REC, 50 YDS, 1 TD
Defensive playmaker
Logan Wilson
CIN
2 INT, 4 TKL
Bengals 19, Rams 16: Cincinnati holds off Los Angeles
Cincinnati broke a 6–6 halftime tie, outscoring Los Angeles 13–10 after the break to win 19–16. The Bengals finished with a narrow 309–292 edge in total offense.
The Rams went 1-for-11 on third down and committed two turnovers, while the Bengals kept the ball for 36:00.
Key advantages
- +1 turnover margin CIN 1 · LAR 2 turnovers
- +17 total yards CIN 309 · LAR 292
- +20% third-down rate CIN 29% · LAR 9%
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Ram or Bengal on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Bengals Won
Cincinnati won the turnover, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Rams | Stat | Bengals |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Turnovers | 1 |
| 292 | Total yards | 309 |
| 9% | Third-down conversion | 29% |
| Other team stats | ||
| 5.6 | Yards per play | 4.2 |
| 52 | Plays | 74 |
| 24:00 | Time of possession | 36:00 |
Scoring Summary
The Bengals scored one touchdown and four field goals; the Rams scored one touchdown and three field goals.
| Time | Team | Play | LAR | CIN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 8:22 | LAR | Brett Maher 30-yard FG Takes lead | 3 | 0 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 12:55 | CIN | Evan McPherson 49-yard FG Ties game | 3 | 3 |
| 9:49 | LAR | Brett Maher 23-yard FG Takes lead | 6 | 3 |
| 0:00 | CIN | Evan McPherson 53-yard FG Ties game | 6 | 6 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 10:37 | LAR | Brett Maher 42-yard FG Takes lead | 9 | 6 |
| 5:34 | CIN | Joe Mixon 14-yard TD run Takes leadEvan McPherson XP | 9 | 13 |
| 3:09 | CIN | Evan McPherson 48-yard FG Extends lead | 9 | 16 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 7:13 | CIN | Evan McPherson 54-yard FG Extends lead | 9 | 19 |
| 1:03 | LAR | Matthew Stafford → Tutu Atwell, 1-yard TDBrett Maher XP | 16 | 19 |
Fantasy Points: Rams vs Bengals, Week 3 2023
Fantasy leaders
- Ja'Marr ChaseCIN · WR26.1 PTSWR6
- Tutu AtwellLAR · WR17.2 PTSWR19
- Joe MixonCIN · RB14.0 PTSRB16
- Matthew StaffordLAR · QB13.5 PTSQB21
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13.5 | QB21 | 18/33 | 269 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 66.4 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.2 | QB26 | 26/49 | 259 | 0 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 | 59.8 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26.1 | WR6 | WR | — | — | — | 15 | 12 | 141 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 17.2 | WR19 | WR | 1 | 22 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 50 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 14.0 | RB16 | RB | 19 | 65 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | ||
| 12.2 | WR36 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 5 | 72 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 12.1 | TE9 | TE | — | — | — | 5 | 5 | 71 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.9 | WR51 | WR | — | — | — | 9 | 5 | 39 | 0 | ||
| 8.5 | RB28 | RB | 10 | 38 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 27 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.0 | WR75 | WR | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 46 | 0 | ||
| 5.0 | TE26 | TE | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 30 | 0 | ||
| 4.1 | WR83 | WR | — | — | — | 8 | 2 | 21 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.0 | TE33 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 10 | 0 | ||
| 1.7 | TE54 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.6 | WR108 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 6 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.3 | WR114 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.4 | RB75 | RB | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fantasy Usage
Los Angeles Rams
Snap Share
Kyren WilliamsRB55 snaps100%
Tyler HigbeeTE53 snaps96%
Puka NacuaWR53 snaps96%
Van JeffersonWR51 snaps93%
Tutu AtwellWR48 snaps87%
Target Share32 targets
- Tutu Atwell28%, 9 targets
- Kyren Williams22%, 7 targets
- Puka Nacua22%, 7 targets
- Tyler Higbee16%, 5 targets
- Van Jefferson9%, 3 targets
- Other3%, 1 targets
Carry Share13 carries
- Kyren Williams77%, 10 carries
- Matthew Stafford8%, 1 carries
- Van Jefferson8%, 1 carries
- Tutu Atwell8%, 1 carries
Cincinnati Bengals
Snap Share
Ja'Marr ChaseWR74 snaps96%
Tee HigginsWR66 snaps86%
Tyler BoydWR59 snaps77%
Joe MixonRB58 snaps75%
Tanner HudsonTE36 snaps47%
Target Share46 targets
- Ja'Marr Chase33%, 15 targets
- Tyler Boyd20%, 9 targets
- Tee Higgins17%, 8 targets
- Tanner Hudson9%, 4 targets
- Mitchell Wilcox7%, 3 targets
- Other15%, 7 targets
Carry Share23 carries
- Joe Mixon83%, 19 carries
- Joe Burrow13%, 3 carries
- Trayveon Williams4%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55 | 100% | 7 | 22% | 10 | |
| 53 | 96% | 5 | 16% | 0 | |
| 53 | 96% | 7 | 22% | 0 | |
| 74 | 96% | 15 | 33% | 0 | |
| 51 | 93% | 3 | 9% | 1 | |
| 48 | 87% | 9 | 28% | 1 | |
| 66 | 86% | 8 | 17% | 0 | |
| 59 | 77% | 9 | 20% | 0 | |
| 58 | 75% | 2 | 4% | 19 | |
| 36 | 47% | 4 | 9% | 0 | |
| 34 | 44% | 1 | 2% | 0 | |
| 32 | 42% | 3 | 7% | 0 | |
| 12 | 22% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 14 | 18% | 2 | 4% | 1 | |
| 8 | 10% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 3 | 4% | 2 | 4% | 0 | |
| 2 | 4% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 1% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+3.8Tyler Higbee12.1 PTS vs 8.3 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−13.3Joe Burrow9.2 PTS vs 22.5 xFP
- Highest expected volume25.0 xFPJa'Marr Chase26.1 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ja'Marr ChaseCIN · WR | 26.1 | 25.0 | +1.1 | 96% | 33% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 15 | 33% |
| Joe BurrowCIN · QB | 9.2 | 22.5 | −13.3 | 100% | 49 att | — | 49 | 3 | 13% | 0 | 0% |
| Kyren WilliamsLAR · RB | 8.5 | 17.8 | −9.3 | 100% | 77% car | — | 0 | 10 | 77% | 7 | 22% |
| Tutu AtwellLAR · WR | 17.2 | 15.6 | +1.6 | 87% | 28% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 8% | 9 | 28% |
| Joe MixonCIN · RB | 14.0 | 15.0 | −1.0 | 75% | 83% car | — | 0 | 19 | 83% | 2 | 4% |
| Tyler BoydCIN · WR | 8.9 | 15.0 | −6.1 | 77% | 20% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 9 | 20% |
| Matthew StaffordLAR · QB | 13.5 | 14.5 | −1.0 | 100% | 33 att | — | 33 | 1 | 8% | 0 | 0% |
| Tee HigginsCIN · WR | 4.1 | 13.4 | −9.3 | 86% | 17% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 17% |
| Puka NacuaLAR · WR | 12.2 | 11.7 | +0.5 | 96% | 22% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 22% |
| Tyler HigbeeLAR · TE | 12.1 | 8.3 | +3.8 | 96% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 16% |
| Tanner HudsonCIN · TE | 5.0 | 6.7 | −1.7 | 47% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 9% |
| Van JeffersonLAR · WR | 6.0 | 5.6 | +0.4 | 93% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 8% | 3 | 9% |
| Mitchell WilcoxCIN · TE | 3.0 | 5.0 | −2.0 | 42% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 7% |
| Trayveon WilliamsCIN · RB | 0.4 | 4.0 | −3.6 | 18% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 2 | 4% |
| Charlie JonesCIN · WR | 1.6 | 3.3 | −1.7 | 4% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 4% |
| Ben SkowronekLAR · WR | 1.3 | 1.7 | −0.4 | 22% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Drew SampleCIN · TE | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 44% | 2% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 2% |
Team totals: Rams 32 targets and 13 carries; Bengals 46 targets and 23 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2023 season: 1.67 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.61 per carry and 0.42 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Matthew Stafford
LAR · QB · 13.5 pts on 14.5 expected
18 of 33 passing for 269 yards, 1 touchdown, 2 interceptions; 1 carry for 7 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 14.5 expected.
Start/Sit: Matthew Stafford →Joe Burrow Unlucky
CIN · QB · 9.2 pts on 22.5 expected
26 of 49 passing for 259 yards, 1 interception; 3 carries for -2 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 22.5 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Start/Sit: Joe Burrow →Kyren Williams Volume, no payoff
LAR · RB · 8.5 pts on 17.8 expected
7 targets (22% of the team's), 2 catches for 27 yards; 10 carries (77% of the team's) for 38 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 17.8 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Start/Sit: Kyren Williams →Tutu Atwell
LAR · WR · 17.2 pts on 15.6 expected
9 targets (28% of the team's), 4 catches for 50 yards and 1 touchdown; 1 carry (8% of the team's) for 22 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 15.6 expected.
Start/Sit: Tutu Atwell →Ja'Marr Chase Strong role
CIN · WR · 26.1 pts on 25.0 expected
15 targets (33% of the team's), 12 catches for 141 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 25.0 expected.
Trend: Season high in targets (15).
Joe Mixon Volume, no payoff
CIN · RB · 14.0 pts on 15.0 expected
2 targets (4% of the team's), 1 catch for 5 yards; 19 carries (83% of the team's) for 65 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 15.0 expected.
Trend: Season high in carries (19).
Tyler Boyd Unlucky
CIN · WR · 8.9 pts on 15.0 expected
9 targets (20% of the team's), 5 catches for 39 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 15.0 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Trend: Season high in targets (9).
Tee Higgins Unlucky
CIN · WR · 4.1 pts on 13.4 expected
8 targets (17% of the team's), 2 catches for 21 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 13.4 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Start/Sit: Tee Higgins →Stock Up, Stock Down
Los Angeles Rams
- ▲Stock up: Kyren Williams played 100% of the snaps, up from a 80% season average.
Cincinnati Bengals
- ▲Stock up: Mitchell Wilcox played 42% of the snaps, up from a 8% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Drew Sample played 44% of the snaps, up from a 28% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2023 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Rams D | Bengals D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 18.9 | 17.7 |
| RBs | 16.0 | 20.3 |
| WRs | 34.5 | 33.9 |
| TEs | 13.2 | 14.5 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Cincinnati opened at 50% win probability and passed 98% in the fourth quarter on the way to the win.
Bengals win probability
Key Swings
- −11Maher 23-yd FG50% → 39%Q2 9:49
- +12McPherson 53-yd FG38% → 50%Q2 0:00
- −13Maher 42-yd FG50% → 37%Q3 10:37
- +34Mixon 14-yd TD run35% → 69%Q3 5:34
- +12McPherson 48-yd FG70% → 83%Q3 3:09
Swing in Bengals win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Los Angeles Rams | Measure | Cincinnati Bengals |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | Plays | 74 |
| 75% | Pass rate | 69% |
| 5.7 | Yds / dropback | 4.7 |
| 5.5 | Yds / carry | 2.9 |
| 1/11 | Third downs | 5/17 |
Efficiency edge Cincinnati ran 22 more plays than Los Angeles.
- Top targets
- LAR Atwell 28% · Williams 22% · Nacua 22%
- CIN Chase 33% · Boyd 20% · Higgins 17%
Possession Results
| Result | LAR | CIN |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 1 | 1 |
| Field goals | 3 | 4 |
| Punts | 6 | 5 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 1 |
| Missed field goals | 0 | 1 |
CIN turnover edge: +1
- The Rams opened the scoring on their first possession, a 8-play, 43-yard drive that ended in a field goal.
- The Bengals drained the clock with two second-half drives of five to six minutes.
All 25 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | Q1 15:00 | 9 | 37 | 3:34 | Missed FG |
| LAR | Q1 11:26 | 8 | 43 | 3:04 | Field goal |
| CIN | Q1 8:22 | 3 | 3 | 2:27 | Punt |
| LAR | Q1 5:55 | 3 | 9 | 1:33 | Punt |
| CIN | Q1 4:22 | 12 | 48 | 6:27 | Field goal |
| LAR | Q2 12:55 | 7 | 70 | 3:06 | Field goal |
| CIN | Q2 9:49 | 6 | 11 | 2:45 | Punt |
| LAR | Q2 7:04 | 3 | 8 | 2:18 | Punt |
| CIN | Q2 4:46 | 4 | 13 | 1:03 | Punt |
| LAR | Q2 3:43 | 1 | 0 | 0:05 | Interception |
| CIN | Q2 3:38 | 3 | -8 | 1:20 | Punt |
| LAR | Q2 2:18 | 5 | 11 | 1:05 | Punt |
| CIN | Q2 1:13 | 6 | 26 | 1:13 | Field goal |
| LAR | Q3 15:00 | 7 | 51 | 4:23 | Field goal |
| CIN | Q3 10:37 | 10 | 75 | 5:03 | Touchdown |
| LAR | Q3 5:34 | 2 | 46 | 0:37 | Interception |
| CIN | Q3 4:57 | 6 | 48 | 1:48 | Field goal |
| LAR | Q3 3:09 | 3 | -2 | 2:32 | Punt |
| CIN | Q3 0:37 | 10 | 35 | 5:16 | Interception |
| LAR | Q4 10:21 | 3 | -16 | 1:35 | Punt |
| CIN | Q4 8:46 | 4 | 5 | 1:33 | Field goal |
| LAR | Q4 7:13 | 3 | 5 | 1:11 | Punt |
| CIN | Q4 6:02 | 3 | -4 | 2:28 | Punt |
| LAR | Q4 3:34 | 10 | 61 | 2:31 | Touchdown |
| CIN | Q4 1:03 | 3 | -2 | 1:03 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Rams vs Bengals Head-to-Head
The Rams and Bengals first met in 1972 and have played 16 times since.
- All-time series
- 9–7Bengals lead, 16 meetings since 1972
- Postseason
- 1–0Rams won in 2021
- Largest Rams win
- 38–101999
- Largest Bengals win
- 31–72015
Since 2021
1–1 Series tied
2 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- R
- B
Oldest to newest. R = Rams win, B = Bengals win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2023 Wk 3 Rams at Bengals CIN 19 LAR 16 CIN W
- 2021 Super Bowl Rams vs Bengals, 2021 Super Bowl recap LAR 23 CIN 20 LAR W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2023 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Rams | Stat | Bengals |
|---|---|---|
| 10-7 | Record | 9-8 |
| 23.8 | Points per game | 21.5 |
| 359.3 | Yards per game | 318.9 |
| 5.6 | Yards per play | 5.2 |
| 22.2 | Points allowed per game | 22.6 |
| 337.9 | Yards allowed per game | 374.6 |
Rams and Bengals in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Ram or a Bengal, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Rams or Bengals player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Rams and Bengals players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Rams and Bengals defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2023 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Rams vs Bengals Game FAQ
Who won the 2023 Rams vs Bengals Week 3 game?
The Cincinnati Bengals beat the Los Angeles Rams 19–16 in Week 3 of the 2023 season. The game was played at Paycor Stadium in Cincinnati, OH, on September 25, 2023. See the Bengals' 2023 schedule.
What was the final score of Rams vs Bengals?
The final score was Bengals 19, Rams 16. The teams were tied 6–6 at halftime, and the second half went Rams 10, Bengals 13.
What happened in the Rams vs Bengals game?
Cincinnati broke a 6–6 halftime tie, outscoring Los Angeles 13–10 after the break to win 19–16. The Bengals finished with a narrow 309–292 edge in total offense. Ja'Marr Chase led all players with 12 catches for 141 yards. The Rams committed 2 turnovers, the Bengals 1.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Rams vs Bengals?
Ja'Marr Chase led the game with 26.1 PPR fantasy points, the WR6 of Week 3, on 12 catches for 141 yards. Tutu Atwell was next with 17.2 (WR19). See Ja'Marr Chase's 2023 game log.
Who led Rams vs Bengals in passing, rushing and receiving?
Matthew Stafford (LAR) led all passers with 18 of 33 for 269 yards, a touchdown and 2 interceptions. Joe Mixon (CIN) led in rushing with 19 carries for 65 yards and a touchdown. Ja'Marr Chase (CIN) led in receiving with 12 catches for 141 yards.
How many fantasy points did Ja'Marr Chase score against the Rams?
Ja'Marr Chase scored 26.1 points in PPR leagues, 20.1 in half-PPR and 14.1 in standard scoring against the Rams in Week 3 of the 2023 season, on 12 catches for 141 yards. He drew 33% of his team's targets.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Rams vs Bengals?
Tyler Higbee outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 12.1 PPR points on 8.3 xFP (+3.8). Joe Burrow fell furthest short, with 9.2 points on 22.5 xFP (−13.3). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Rams vs Bengals?
Ja'Marr Chase had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 25.0 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 26.1. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Bengals beat the Rams?
The Bengals beat the Rams 19–16 because they won the turnover battle 2–1 and outgained them 309–292.
Which team won the turnover battle in Rams vs Bengals?
The Bengals won the turnover battle 2–1: the Rams gave the ball away 2 times and the Bengals 1 time. The Bengals won the game.
What was the turning point of Rams vs Bengals?
Joe Mixon's 14-yard touchdown run with 5:34 left in the third quarter was the biggest swing of the game, moving the Bengals' win probability from 35% to 69%.
What is the all-time Rams vs Bengals record?
The Bengals lead the all-time series 9–7 across 16 meetings since 1972, including a 0–1 record in the postseason.
Have the Rams and Bengals played in the Super Bowl?
Yes, once: the Rams won Super Bowl LVI 23–20 over the Bengals after the 2021 season.
When did the Rams and Bengals last play before this game?
Before Week 3 of 2023, they last met in Super Bowl LVI on February 13, 2022, when the Rams beat the Bengals 23–20.
What is the Rams vs Bengals record since 2021?
The series is tied 1–1 across 2 meetings since the 2021 season, including this game.
