Final2025 Week 3
U.S. Bank Stadium, Minneapolis, MN|
Cincinnati Bengals vs Minnesota Vikings, Week 3 2025
Cincinnati Bengals
Away
10
Minnesota Vikings
HomeWon
48
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bengals | 0 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 10 |
| Vikings | 14 | 20 | 14 | 0 | 48 |
CIN 10 · MIN 48 Final
Passing leader
MIN · QB
15.3PPR pts
14/20, 173 YDS, 2 TD
Top fantasy scorer
MIN · RB
23.6PPR pts
16 ATT, 116 YDS, 2 TD
Bengals leader
CIN · TE
10.0PPR pts
2 REC, 20 YDS, 1 TD
Defensive playmaker
Isaiah Rodgers
MIN
1 INT, 2 TD, 3 TKL
Vikings 48, Bengals 10: Minnesota leads from start to finish
Minnesota led 34–3 at halftime after a 20-point second quarter and outscored Cincinnati 14–7 after the break to win 48–10. The Vikings finished with a 352–171 edge in total offense and averaged 6.1 yards per play.
The gap showed up everywhere. The Bengals went 3-for-11 on third down and committed five turnovers, while the Vikings finished without a giveaway.
Key advantages
- +2.8 yards/play MIN 6.1 · CIN 3.3
- +5 turnover margin MIN 0 turnovers
- +181 total yards MIN 352 · CIN 171
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Bengal or Viking on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Vikings Won
Minnesota won the efficiency, turnover, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Bengals | Stat | Vikings |
|---|---|---|
| 3.3 | Yards per play | 6.1 |
| 5 | Turnovers | 0 |
| 171 | Total yards | 352 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 52 | Plays | 58 |
| 27% | Third-down conversion | 33% |
| 29:04 | Time of possession | 30:56 |
Scoring Summary
The Vikings scored six touchdowns and two field goals; the Bengals scored one touchdown and one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | CIN | MIN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 12:57 | MIN | Carson Wentz → Josh Oliver, 12-yard TD Takes leadWill Reichard XP | 0 | 7 |
| 6:08 | MIN | Isaiah Rodgers 87-yard interception return TD Extends leadWill Reichard XP | 0 | 14 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 9:20 | MIN | Will Reichard 35-yard FG Extends lead | 0 | 17 |
| 4:42 | CIN | Evan McPherson 45-yard FG | 3 | 17 |
| 1:47 | MIN | Isaiah Rodgers 66-yard fumble return TD Extends leadWill Reichard XP | 3 | 24 |
| 0:33 | MIN | Jordan Mason 5-yard TD run Extends leadWill Reichard XP | 3 | 31 |
| 0:00 | MIN | Will Reichard 62-yard FG Extends lead | 3 | 34 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 6:00 | MIN | Jordan Mason 4-yard TD run Extends leadWill Reichard XP | 3 | 41 |
| 0:17 | MIN | Carson Wentz → T.J. Hockenson, 5-yard TD Extends leadWill Reichard XP | 3 | 48 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 11:12 | CIN | Jake Browning → Drew Sample, 4-yard TDEvan McPherson XP | 10 | 48 |
Fantasy Points: Bengals vs Vikings, Week 3 2025
Fantasy leaders
- Jordan MasonMIN · RB23.6 PTSRB7
- T.J. HockensonMIN · TE15.9 PTSTE5
- Carson WentzMIN · QB15.3 PTSQB13
- Justin JeffersonMIN · WR12.5 PTSWR30
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15.3 | QB13 | 14/20 | 173 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 129.8 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.9 | QB29 | 19/27 | 140 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 63.8 | ||
| 1.2 | QB34 | 2/4 | 29 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | 74.0 |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.6 | RB7 | RB | 16 | 116 | 2 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 15.9 | TE5 | TE | — | — | — | 6 | 5 | 49 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 12.5 | WR30 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 5 | 75 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 10.0 | TE12 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 20 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.9 | WR41 | WR | 1 | 9 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 50 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.2 | TE18 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 12 | 1 | ||
| 6.7 | WR57 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 37 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.0 | RB43 | RB | 8 | 30 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.0 | RB42 | RB | 10 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 17 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.6 | TE29 | TE | — | — | — | 5 | 5 | 26 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.5 | WR99 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 15 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.9 | RB64 | RB | 5 | 19 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1.9 | WR107 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.7 | RB66 | RB | 5 | 17 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.6 | TE50 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.6 | TE53 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.1 | RB75 | RB | 4 | 21 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fantasy Usage
Cincinnati Bengals
Snap Share
Ja'Marr ChaseWR48 snaps86%
Tee HigginsWR46 snaps82%
Drew SampleTE38 snaps68%
Andrei IosivasWR35 snaps63%
Chase BrownRB31 snaps55%
Target Share26 targets
- Ja'Marr Chase23%, 6 targets
- Noah Fant19%, 5 targets
- Chase Brown19%, 5 targets
- Mike Gesicki12%, 3 targets
- Drew Sample12%, 3 targets
- Other15%, 4 targets
Carry Share21 carries
- Chase Brown48%, 10 carries
- Tahj Brooks24%, 5 carries
- Samaje Perine19%, 4 carries
- Jake Browning5%, 1 carries
- Ja'Marr Chase5%, 1 carries
Minnesota Vikings
Snap Share
Jalen NailorWR50 snaps83%
Justin JeffersonWR48 snaps80%
Adam ThielenWR45 snaps75%
T.J. HockensonTE41 snaps68%
Jordan MasonRB36 snaps60%
Target Share24 targets
- Justin Jefferson29%, 7 targets
- T.J. Hockenson25%, 6 targets
- Jalen Nailor21%, 5 targets
- Adam Thielen8%, 2 targets
- Josh Oliver4%, 1 targets
- Other13%, 3 targets
Carry Share31 carries
- Jordan Mason52%, 16 carries
- Zavier Scott26%, 8 carries
- Cam Akers16%, 5 carries
- Carson Wentz6%, 2 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48 | 86% | 6 | 23% | 1 | |
| 50 | 83% | 5 | 21% | 0 | |
| 46 | 82% | 2 | 8% | 0 | |
| 48 | 80% | 7 | 29% | 0 | |
| 45 | 75% | 2 | 8% | 0 | |
| 41 | 68% | 6 | 25% | 0 | |
| 38 | 68% | 3 | 12% | 0 | |
| 35 | 63% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 36 | 60% | 0 | 0% | 16 | |
| 31 | 55% | 5 | 19% | 10 | |
| 21 | 35% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 18 | 32% | 5 | 19% | 0 | |
| 17 | 30% | 3 | 12% | 0 | |
| 17 | 28% | 1 | 4% | 8 | |
| 15 | 27% | 0 | 0% | 4 | |
| 13 | 22% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 12 | 21% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 12 | 20% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 10 | 18% | 0 | 0% | 5 | |
| 10 | 17% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 7 | 13% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 7 | 12% | 1 | 4% | 5 | |
| 3 | 5% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+13.3Jordan Mason23.6 PTS vs 10.3 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−9.0Chase Brown6.0 PTS vs 15.0 xFP
- Highest expected volume15.0 xFPChase Brown6.0 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chase BrownCIN · RB | 6.0 | 15.0 | −9.0 | 55% | 48% car | — | 0 | 10 | 48% | 5 | 19% |
| Jake BrowningCIN · QB | 7.9 | 12.6 | −4.7 | 95% | 27 att | — | 27 | 1 | 5% | 0 | 0% |
| Justin JeffersonMIN · WR | 12.5 | 11.9 | +0.6 | 80% | 29% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 29% |
| Ja'Marr ChaseCIN · WR | 8.9 | 10.9 | −2.0 | 86% | 23% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 5% | 6 | 23% |
| Jordan MasonMIN · RB | 23.6 | 10.3 | +13.3 | 60% | 52% car | — | 0 | 16 | 52% | 0 | 0% |
| Carson WentzMIN · QB | 15.3 | 10.2 | +5.1 | 80% | 20 att | — | 20 | 2 | 6% | 0 | 0% |
| T.J. HockensonMIN · TE | 15.9 | 10.2 | +5.7 | 68% | 25% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 25% |
| Jalen NailorMIN · WR | 6.7 | 8.5 | −1.8 | 83% | 21% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 21% |
| Noah FantCIN · TE | 5.6 | 8.5 | −2.9 | 32% | 19% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 19% |
| Zavier ScottMIN · RB | 6.0 | 6.9 | −0.9 | 28% | 26% car | — | 0 | 8 | 26% | 1 | 4% |
| Drew SampleCIN · TE | 10.0 | 5.1 | +4.9 | 68% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 12% |
| Mike GesickiCIN · TE | 1.6 | 5.1 | −3.5 | 30% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 12% |
| Cam AkersMIN · RB | 1.9 | 4.9 | −3.0 | 12% | 16% car | — | 0 | 5 | 16% | 1 | 4% |
| Adam ThielenMIN · WR | 0.0 | 3.4 | −3.4 | 75% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 8% |
| Tee HigginsCIN · WR | 2.5 | 3.4 | −0.9 | 82% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 8% |
| Tahj BrooksCIN · RB | 1.7 | 3.2 | −1.5 | 18% | 24% car | — | 0 | 5 | 24% | 0 | 0% |
| Samaje PerineCIN · RB | 0.1 | 2.6 | −2.5 | 27% | 19% car | — | 0 | 4 | 19% | 0 | 0% |
| Max BrosmerMIN · QB | 1.2 | 1.8 | −0.6 | 20% | 4 att | — | 4 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Cam GrandyCIN · TE | 1.6 | 1.7 | −0.1 | 21% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Josh OliverMIN · TE | 8.2 | 1.7 | +6.5 | 35% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Mitchell TinsleyCIN · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 13% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Tai FeltonMIN · WR | 1.9 | 1.7 | +0.2 | 20% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
Team totals: Bengals 26 targets and 21 carries; Vikings 24 targets and 31 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2025 season: 1.70 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.65 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Jake Browning
CIN · QB · 7.9 pts on 12.6 expected
19 of 27 passing for 140 yards, 1 touchdown, 2 interceptions; 1 carry for 3 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 12.6 expected.
Carson Wentz Ran hot
MIN · QB · 15.3 pts on 10.2 expected
14 of 20 passing for 173 yards, 2 touchdowns; 2 carries for 4 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 10.2 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Start/Sit: Carson Wentz →Chase Brown Unlucky
CIN · RB · 6.0 pts on 15.0 expected
5 targets (19% of the team's), 4 catches for 17 yards; 10 carries (48% of the team's) for 3 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 15.0 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Start/Sit: Chase Brown →Ja'Marr Chase
CIN · WR · 8.9 pts on 10.9 expected
6 targets (23% of the team's), 5 catches for 50 yards; 1 carry (5% of the team's) for 9 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 10.9 expected.
Start/Sit: Ja'Marr Chase →Justin Jefferson
MIN · WR · 12.5 pts on 11.9 expected
7 targets (29% of the team's), 5 catches for 75 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 11.9 expected.
Start/Sit: Justin Jefferson →Jordan Mason Ran hot
MIN · RB · 23.6 pts on 10.3 expected
16 carries (52% of the team's) for 116 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 10.3 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Trend: Season high in carries (16).
T.J. Hockenson Ran hot
MIN · TE · 15.9 pts on 10.2 expected
6 targets (25% of the team's), 5 catches for 49 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 10.2 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Trend: Season high in targets (6).
Josh Oliver Ran hot
MIN · TE · 8.2 pts on 1.7 expected
1 target (4% of the team's), 1 catch for 12 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 1.7 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Cincinnati Bengals
- ▼Stock down: Chase Brown played 55% of the snaps, down from a 73% season average.
Minnesota Vikings
- ▼Stock down: Justin Jefferson played 80% of the snaps, down from a 99% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2025 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Bengals D | Vikings D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 18.8 | 11.5 |
| RBs | 28.4 | 19.0 |
| WRs | 25.4 | 23.5 |
| TEs | 20.7 | 10.7 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Minnesota opened at 50% win probability and passed 98% before halftime on the way to the win.
Vikings win probability
Key Swings
- +20Wentz → Oliver, 12-yd TD50% → 70%Q1 12:57
- +16Rodgers 87-yd pick-six71% → 87%Q1 6:08
- +4Reichard 35-yd FG90% → 94%Q2 9:20
- −4McPherson 45-yd FG95% → 91%Q2 4:42
- +6Rodgers 66-yd TD92% → 98%Q2 1:47
Swing in Vikings win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Cincinnati Bengals | Measure | Minnesota Vikings |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | Plays | 58 |
| 60% | Pass rate | 47% |
| 3.8 | Yds / dropback | 6.8 |
| 2.5 | Yds / carry | 5.5 |
| 3/11 | Third downs | 4/12 |
Efficiency edge Minnesota ran 6 more plays and gained 3.0 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- CIN Chase 23% · Brown 19% · Fant 19%
- MIN Jefferson 29% · Hockenson 25% · Nailor 21%
Possession Results
| Result | CIN | MIN |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 1 | 4 |
| Field goals | 1 | 2 |
| Punts | 6 | 5 |
| Turnovers | 5 | 0 |
MIN turnover edge: +5
- The Vikings opened the scoring on their first possession, a 6-play, 64-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
All 25 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIN | Q1 15:00 | 6 | 64 | 2:03 | Touchdown |
| CIN | Q1 12:57 | 3 | 0 | 1:41 | Punt |
| MIN | Q1 11:16 | 3 | -9 | 2:27 | Punt |
| CIN | Q1 8:49 | 5 | 23 | 2:41 | Interception |
| CIN | Q1 6:08 | 3 | -7 | 2:22 | Punt |
| MIN | Q1 3:46 | 3 | 4 | 2:07 | Punt |
| CIN | Q1 1:39 | 6 | 4 | 2:51 | Punt |
| MIN | Q2 13:48 | 10 | 26 | 4:28 | Field goal |
| CIN | Q2 9:20 | 9 | 48 | 4:38 | Field goal |
| MIN | Q2 4:42 | 3 | -6 | 1:50 | Punt |
| CIN | Q2 2:52 | 3 | 14 | 1:05 | Fumble |
| CIN | Q2 1:47 | 2 | 20 | 0:26 | Fumble |
| MIN | Q2 1:21 | 3 | 52 | 0:48 | Touchdown |
| CIN | Q2 0:33 | 1 | 5 | 0:13 | Fumble |
| MIN | Q2 0:20 | 4 | 3 | 0:20 | Field goal |
| CIN | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 3 | 2:18 | Punt |
| MIN | Q3 12:42 | 10 | 74 | 6:42 | Touchdown |
| CIN | Q3 6:00 | 5 | 24 | 2:11 | Interception |
| MIN | Q3 3:49 | 6 | 68 | 3:32 | Touchdown |
| CIN | Q3 0:17 | 7 | 65 | 4:05 | Touchdown |
| MIN | Q4 11:12 | 3 | 3 | 0:59 | Punt |
| CIN | Q4 10:13 | 3 | -4 | 2:16 | Punt |
| MIN | Q4 7:57 | 3 | 6 | 1:59 | Punt |
| CIN | Q4 5:58 | 3 | 6 | 2:17 | Punt |
| MIN | Q4 3:41 | 6 | 39 | 3:41 | End of game |
About these numbers
The Vikings' interception touchdown is counted as a Bengals interception, not as a Vikings possession. The Vikings' fumble touchdown is counted as a Bengals lost fumble, not as a Vikings possession. Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Bengals vs Vikings Head-to-Head
The Bengals and Vikings first met in 1973 and have played 16 times since.
- All-time series
- 8–8Series tied, 16 meetings since 1973
- Postseason
- 0No playoff meetings
- Largest Bengals win
- 37–82005
- Largest Vikings win
- 48–102025
Since 2021
2–1 Bengals lead
3 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- B
- B
- V
Oldest to newest. B = Bengals win, V = Vikings win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wk 3 Bengals at Vikings MIN 48 CIN 10 MIN W
- 2023 Wk 15 Vikings at Bengals, 2023 Wk 15 recap CIN 27 MIN 24 CIN W
- 2021 Wk 1 Vikings at Bengals, 2021 Wk 1 recap CIN 27 MIN 24 CIN W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2025 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Bengals | Stat | Vikings |
|---|---|---|
| 6-11 | Record | 9-8 |
| 24.4 | Points per game | 20.2 |
| 329.2 | Yards per game | 275.0 |
| 5.3 | Yards per play | 4.9 |
| 28.9 | Points allowed per game | 19.6 |
| 380.9 | Yards allowed per game | 282.6 |
Bengals and Vikings in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Bengal or a Viking, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Bengals or Vikings player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Bengals and Vikings players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Bengals and Vikings defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2025 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Bengals vs Vikings Game FAQ
Who won the 2025 Bengals vs Vikings Week 3 game?
The Minnesota Vikings beat the Cincinnati Bengals 48–10 in Week 3 of the 2025 season. The game was played at U.S. Bank Stadium in Minneapolis, MN, on September 21, 2025. See the Vikings' 2025 schedule.
What was the final score of Bengals vs Vikings?
The final score was Vikings 48, Bengals 10. The Vikings led 34–3 at halftime, and the second half went Bengals 7, Vikings 14.
What happened in the Bengals vs Vikings game?
Minnesota led 34–3 at halftime after a 20-point second quarter and outscored Cincinnati 14–7 after the break to win 48–10. The Vikings finished with a 352–171 edge in total offense and averaged 6.1 yards per play. Jordan Mason led all players with 16 carries for 116 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. The Bengals committed 5 turnovers, the Vikings none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Bengals vs Vikings?
Jordan Mason led the game with 23.6 PPR fantasy points, the RB7 of Week 3, on 16 carries for 116 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. T.J. Hockenson was next with 15.9 (TE5). See Jordan Mason's 2025 game log.
Who led Bengals vs Vikings in passing, rushing and receiving?
Carson Wentz (MIN) led all passers with 14 of 20 for 173 yards and 2 touchdowns. Jordan Mason (MIN) led in rushing with 16 carries for 116 yards and 2 touchdowns. Justin Jefferson (MIN) led in receiving with 5 catches for 75 yards.
How many fantasy points did Jordan Mason score against the Bengals?
Jordan Mason scored 23.6 fantasy points against the Bengals in Week 3 of the 2025 season, the same in PPR, half-PPR and standard scoring because he had no catches, on 16 carries for 116 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. He handled 52% of his team's carries.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Bengals vs Vikings?
Jordan Mason outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 23.6 PPR points on 10.3 xFP (+13.3). Chase Brown fell furthest short, with 6.0 points on 15.0 xFP (−9.0). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Bengals vs Vikings?
Chase Brown had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 15.0 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 6.0. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Vikings beat the Bengals?
The Vikings beat the Bengals 48–10 because they averaged 6.1 yards per play to 3.3, won the turnover battle 5–0, and outgained them 352–171.
Which team won the turnover battle in Bengals vs Vikings?
The Vikings won the turnover battle 5–0: the Bengals gave the ball away 5 times and the Vikings not at all. The Vikings won the game.
What is the all-time Bengals vs Vikings record?
The all-time series is tied 8–8 across 16 meetings since 1973.
When did the Bengals and Vikings last play before this game?
Before Week 3 of 2025, they last met in the 2023 season on December 16, 2023, when the Bengals beat the Vikings 27–24.
What is the Bengals vs Vikings record since 2021?
The Bengals lead 2–1 across 3 meetings since the 2021 season, including this game.
