Detroit Lions vs Los Angeles Rams, Week 15 2025
Detroit Lions
Away
34
Los Angeles Rams
HomeWon
41
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lions | 7 | 17 | 0 | 10 | 34 |
| Rams | 7 | 10 | 17 | 7 | 41 |
DET 34LAR 41 Final
Passing leader
21.9PPR pts
24/38, 368 YDS, 2 TD, 1 INT
Top fantasy scorer
41.4PPR pts
13 REC, 164 YDS, 2 TD
Lions leader
26.4PPR pts
7 REC, 134 YDS, 1 TD
Defensive playmaker
Aidan Hutchinson
1 INT, 1 SACK, 3 TKL
Rams 41, Lions 34: Los Angeles rallies from 7 down at halftime
Los Angeles erased a 24–17 halftime deficit, outscoring Detroit 24–10 after the break to win 41–34. The Rams finished with a 519–396 edge in total offense and averaged 7.5 yards per play.
The Lions went 5-for-14 on third down, while the Rams kept the ball for 33:35.
Key advantages
- +1.1 yards/play LAR 7.5 · DET 6.4
- +123 total yards LAR 519 · DET 396
- +7:10 time of possession LAR 33:35 · DET 26:25
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Lion or Ram on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Rams Won
Los Angeles won the efficiency and time of possession battles.
| Lions | Stat | Rams |
|---|---|---|
| 6.4 | Yards per play | 7.5 |
| 396 | Total yards | 519 |
| 26:25 | Time of possession | 33:35 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 62 | Plays | 69 |
| 0 | Turnovers | 1 |
| 36% | Third-down conversion | 22% |
Scoring Summary
The Rams scored five touchdowns and two field goals; the Lions scored four touchdowns and two field goals.
| Time | Team | Play | DET | LAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 8:07 | DET | Jared Goff → Amon-Ra St. Brown, 17-yard TD Takes leadJake Bates XP | 7 | 0 |
| 2:44 | LAR | Kyren Williams 4-yard TD run Ties gameHarrison Mevis XP | 7 | 7 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 12:04 | DET | Jake Bates 24-yard FG Takes lead | 10 | 7 |
| 8:31 | LAR | Kyren Williams 1-yard TD run Takes leadHarrison Mevis XP | 10 | 14 |
| 6:12 | DET | Jared Goff → Amon-Ra St. Brown, 8-yard TD Takes leadJake Bates XP | 17 | 14 |
| 0:30 | DET | Jared Goff → Jameson Williams, 31-yard TD Extends leadJake Bates XP | 24 | 14 |
| 0:00 | LAR | Harrison Mevis 37-yard FG | 24 | 17 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 9:07 | LAR | Harrison Mevis 44-yard FG | 24 | 20 |
| 2:26 | LAR | Matthew Stafford → Colby Parkinson, 26-yard TD Takes leadHarrison Mevis XP | 24 | 27 |
| 0:28 | LAR | Blake Corum 11-yard TD run Extends leadHarrison Mevis XP | 24 | 34 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 7:54 | DET | Jake Bates 48-yard FG | 27 | 34 |
| 4:49 | LAR | Matthew Stafford → Colby Parkinson, 11-yard TD Extends leadHarrison Mevis XP | 27 | 41 |
| 2:42 | DET | David Montgomery 1-yard TD runJake Bates XP | 34 | 41 |
Fantasy Points: Lions vs Rams, Week 15 2025
Fantasy leaders
- Amon-Ra St. Brown41.4 PTSWR1
- Puka Nacua27.9 PTSWR2
- Jameson Williams26.4 PTSWR3
- Jared Goff25.5 PTSQB5
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Stafford | 21.9 | QB11 | 24/38 | 368 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 101.6 | Start/Sit → |
| Jared Goff | 25.5 | QB5 | 25/41 | 338 | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 111.6 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amon-Ra St. Brown | 41.4 | WR1 | WR | — | — | — | 18 | 13 | 164 | 2 | Start/Sit → |
| Puka Nacua | 27.9 | WR2 | WR | 2 | 8 | 0 | 11 | 9 | 181 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Jameson Williams | 26.4 | WR3 | WR | — | — | — | 10 | 7 | 134 | 1 | Start/Sit → |
| Colby Parkinson | 24.5 | TE5 | TE | — | — | — | 7 | 5 | 75 | 2 | Start/Sit → |
| Kyren Williams | 21.8 | RB8 | RB | 15 | 78 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Blake Corum | 13.1 | RB21 | RB | 11 | 71 | 1 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → |
| Davante Adams | 11.1 | WR35 | WR | — | — | — | 9 | 4 | 71 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Jahmyr Gibbs | 9.8 | RB30 | RB | 13 | 38 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 20 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| David Montgomery | 9.2 | RB34 | RB | 7 | 32 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Davis Allen | 4.6 | TE33 | TE | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 16 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Kalif Raymond | 3.0 | WR85 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 20 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Tutu Atwell | 1.9 | WR93 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 9 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Terrance Ferguson | 1.6 | TE55 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 6 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Jordan Whittington | 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Isaac TeSlaa | 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Konata Mumpfield | 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Detroit Lions
Snap Share
Target Share38 targets
- Amon-Ra St. Brown47%, 18 targets
- Jameson Williams26%, 10 targets
- Jahmyr Gibbs18%, 7 targets
- Kalif Raymond3%, 1 targets
- David Montgomery3%, 1 targets
- Other3%, 1 targets
Carry Share20 carries
- , 13 carries
- , 7 carries
Los Angeles Rams
Snap Share
Target Share38 targets
- Puka Nacua29%, 11 targets
- Davante Adams24%, 9 targets
- Colby Parkinson18%, 7 targets
- Davis Allen11%, 4 targets
- Tutu Atwell5%, 2 targets
- Other13%, 5 targets
Carry Share29 carries
- , 15 carries
- , 11 carries
- , 2 carries
- , 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amon-Ra St. Brown | 61 | 95% | 18 | 47% | 0 |
| Jameson Williams | 58 | 91% | 10 | 26% | 0 |
| Colby Parkinson | 62 | 86% | 7 | 18% | 0 |
| Jahmyr Gibbs | 52 | 81% | 7 | 18% | 13 |
| Terrance Ferguson | 56 | 78% | 2 | 5% | 0 |
| Davis Allen | 54 | 75% | 4 | 11% | 0 |
| Isaac TeSlaa | 40 | 63% | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| Shane Zylstra | 37 | 58% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
| Puka Nacua | 40 | 56% | 11 | 29% | 2 |
| Kyren Williams | 39 | 54% | 1 | 3% | 15 |
| Davante Adams | 33 | 46% | 9 | 24% | 0 |
| Blake Corum | 33 | 46% | 0 | 0% | 11 |
| Konata Mumpfield | 32 | 44% | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| Anthony Firkser | 22 | 34% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
| David Montgomery | 18 | 28% | 1 | 3% | 7 |
| Kalif Raymond | 11 | 17% | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| Tutu Atwell | 4 | 6% | 2 | 5% | 0 |
| Jordan Whittington | 4 | 6% | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| Xavier Smith | 3 | 4% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+12.6Colby Parkinson24.5 PTS vs 11.9 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−10.5Jahmyr Gibbs9.8 PTS vs 20.3 xFP
- Highest expected volume30.7 xFPAmon-Ra St. Brown41.4 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amon-Ra St. BrownDET · WR | 41.4 | 30.7 | +10.7 | 95% | 47% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 18 | 47% |
| Jahmyr GibbsDET · RB | 9.8 | 20.3 | −10.5 | 81% | 65% car | — | 0 | 13 | 65% | 7 | 18% |
| Puka NacuaLAR · WR | 27.9 | 20.0 | +7.9 | 56% | 29% tgt | — | 0 | 2 | 7% | 11 | 29% |
| Jared GoffDET · QB | 25.5 | 18.2 | +7.3 | 100% | 41 att | — | 41 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Matthew StaffordLAR · QB | 21.9 | 17.5 | +4.4 | 100% | 38 att | — | 38 | 1 | 3% | 0 | 0% |
| Jameson WilliamsDET · WR | 26.4 | 17.0 | +9.4 | 91% | 26% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 10 | 26% |
| Davante AdamsLAR · WR | 11.1 | 15.3 | −4.2 | 46% | 24% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 9 | 24% |
| Colby ParkinsonLAR · TE | 24.5 | 11.9 | +12.6 | 86% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 18% |
| Kyren WilliamsLAR · RB | 21.8 | 11.4 | +10.4 | 54% | 52% car | — | 0 | 15 | 52% | 1 | 3% |
| Blake CorumLAR · RB | 13.1 | 7.1 | +6.0 | 46% | 38% car | — | 0 | 11 | 38% | 0 | 0% |
| Davis AllenLAR · TE | 4.6 | 6.8 | −2.2 | 75% | 11% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 11% |
| David MontgomeryDET · RB | 9.2 | 6.2 | +3.0 | 28% | 35% car | — | 0 | 7 | 35% | 1 | 3% |
| Terrance FergusonLAR · TE | 1.6 | 3.4 | −1.8 | 78% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 5% |
| Tutu AtwellLAR · WR | 1.9 | 3.4 | −1.5 | 6% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 5% |
| Isaac TeSlaaDET · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 63% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Jordan WhittingtonLAR · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 6% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Kalif RaymondDET · WR | 3.0 | 1.7 | +1.3 | 17% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Konata MumpfieldLAR · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 44% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
Team totals: Lions 38 targets and 20 carries; Rams 38 targets and 29 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2025 season: 1.70 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.65 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Jared Goff Ran hot
25 of 41 passing for 338 yards, 3 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 18.2 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Best score since Week 2.
Matthew Stafford
24 of 38 passing for 368 yards, 2 touchdowns, 1 interception; 1 carry for 2 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 17.5 expected.
Amon-Ra St. Brown Ran hot
18 targets (47% of the team's), 13 catches for 164 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 30.7 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Season high in targets (18). Best fantasy game of the season.
Jahmyr Gibbs Volume, no payoff
7 targets (18% of the team's), 4 catches for 20 yards; 13 carries (65% of the team's) for 38 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 20.3 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Fewest points since Week 9.
Puka Nacua Ran hot
11 targets (29% of the team's), 9 catches for 181 yards; 2 carries (7% of the team's) for 8 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 20.0 points; efficiency supplied the rest.
Davante Adams
9 targets (24% of the team's), 4 catches for 71 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 15.3 expected.
A touchdown in 6 of the last 8 games.
Jameson Williams Ran hot
10 targets (26% of the team's), 7 catches for 134 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 17.0 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
A touchdown in 5 of the last 8 games.
Colby Parkinson Ran hot
7 targets (18% of the team's), 5 catches for 75 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 11.9 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Season high in targets (7). Best fantasy game of the season.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Detroit Lions
- Stock up: Jahmyr Gibbs played 81% of the snaps, up from a 64% season average.
- Stock up: Isaac TeSlaa played 63% of the snaps, up from a 34% season average.
- Stock down: Kalif Raymond played 17% of the snaps, down from a 43% season average.
Los Angeles Rams
- Stock up: Colby Parkinson played 86% of the snaps, up from a 52% season average.
- Stock up: Blake Corum played 46% of the snaps, up from a 28% season average.
- Stock up: Davis Allen played 75% of the snaps, up from a 46% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2025 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Lions D | Rams D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 18.7 | 15.9 |
| RBs | 19.3 | 17.4 |
| WRs | 34.5 | 32.7 |
| TEs | 13.4 | 13.0 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Los Angeles opened at 66% win probability and passed 98% in the fourth quarter on the way to the win.
Rams win probability
Key Swings
- +23Williams 4-yd TD run41% → 64%Q1 2:44
- +24Williams 1-yd TD run52% → 76%Q2 8:31
- −25Goff → Brown, 8-yd TD76% → 51%Q2 6:12
- −26Goff → Williams, 31-yd TD49% → 23%Q2 0:30
- +37Stafford → Parkinson, 26-yd TD37% → 74%Q3 2:26
Swing in Rams win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Detroit Lions | Measure | Los Angeles Rams |
|---|---|---|
| 62 | Plays | 69 |
| 68% | Pass rate | 58% |
| 7.8 | Yds / dropback | 9.0 |
| 3.5 | Yds / carry | 5.5 |
| 5/14 | Third downs | 2/9 |
Efficiency edge Los Angeles ran 7 more plays and gained 1.2 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- DET Brown 47% · Williams 26% · Gibbs 18%
- LAR Nacua 29% · Adams 24% · Parkinson 18%
Possession Results
| Result | DET | LAR |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 4 | 5 |
| Field goals | 2 | 2 |
| Punts | 3 | 3 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 1 |
| Missed field goals | 1 | 0 |
DET turnover edge: +1
- The Lions opened the scoring on their second possession, a 1-play, 17-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
- The Rams scored touchdowns on two of their first three drives, then drained the clock with two second-half drives of four to six minutes.
All 22 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET | Q1 15:00 | 8 | 40 | 3:48 | Missed FG |
| LAR | Q1 11:12 | 6 | 47 | 3:00 | Interception |
| DET | Q1 8:12 | 1 | 17 | 0:05 | Touchdown |
| LAR | Q1 8:07 | 13 | 72 | 5:23 | Touchdown |
| DET | Q1 2:44 | 12 | 59 | 5:40 | Field goal |
| LAR | Q2 12:04 | 6 | 69 | 3:33 | Touchdown |
| DET | Q2 8:31 | 4 | 65 | 2:19 | Touchdown |
| LAR | Q2 6:12 | 5 | 17 | 3:03 | Punt |
| DET | Q2 3:09 | 9 | 80 | 2:39 | Touchdown |
| LAR | Q2 0:30 | 5 | 47 | 0:30 | Field goal |
| LAR | Q3 15:00 | 11 | 41 | 5:53 | Field goal |
| DET | Q3 9:07 | 3 | 5 | 2:28 | Punt |
| LAR | Q3 6:39 | 9 | 88 | 4:13 | Touchdown |
| DET | Q3 2:26 | 3 | -12 | 1:06 | Punt |
| LAR | Q3 1:20 | 2 | 50 | 0:52 | Touchdown |
| DET | Q3 0:28 | 3 | 3 | 1:28 | Punt |
| LAR | Q4 14:00 | 3 | 7 | 1:34 | Punt |
| DET | Q4 12:26 | 9 | 36 | 4:32 | Field goal |
| LAR | Q4 7:54 | 6 | 68 | 3:05 | Touchdown |
| DET | Q4 4:49 | 12 | 65 | 2:07 | Touchdown |
| LAR | Q4 2:42 | 5 | 13 | 2:29 | Punt |
| DET | Q4 0:13 | 1 | 21 | 0:13 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Lions vs Rams Head-to-Head
The Lions and Rams first met in 1937 and have played 90 times since.
- All-time series
- 46–43–1Rams lead, 90 meetings since 1937
- Postseason
- 2–0Lions won in 1952 and 2023
- Largest Lions win
- 44–62010
- Largest Rams win
- 65–241950
Since 2021
2–2 Series tied
4 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
Oldest to newest. L = Lions win, R = Rams win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wk 15 Lions at Rams LAR 41 DET 34 LAR W
- 2024 Wk 1 Rams at Lions, 2024 Wk 1 recap DET 26 LAR 20 DET W
- 2023 Wild Card Rams at Lions, 2023 Wild Card recap DET 24 LAR 23 DET W
- 2021 Wk 7 Lions at Rams, 2021 Wk 7 recap LAR 28 DET 19 LAR W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2025 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Lions | Stat | Rams |
|---|---|---|
| 9-8 | Record | 12-5 |
| 28.3 | Points per game | 30.5 |
| 373.2 | Yards per game | 394.6 |
| 6.0 | Yards per play | 6.2 |
| 24.3 | Points allowed per game | 20.4 |
| 331.9 | Yards allowed per game | 327.5 |
Lions vs Rams Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- LAR −5.5Rams covered by 1.5
- Total
- 54.5Over: 75 points scored (by 20.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rams | 30.0 | 41 | +11.0 |
| Lions | 24.5 | 34 | +9.5 |
Both offenses beat the market's expectation, and the Fantasy tab shows who cashed in.
Betting Trends
Last 2 meetings: Lions 1–1 ATS, overs and unders 1–1.
Each team's 2025 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Detroit Lions
- Against the spread
- 1–2
- Over/under
- 3–0
- ATS as favorite
- 1–0
- ATS as underdog
- 0–1
- ATS on the road
- 0–1
Los Angeles Rams
- Against the spread
- 2–1
- Over/under
- 3–0
- ATS as favorite
- 2–1
- ATS at home
- 1–0
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Lions and Rams in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Lion or a Ram, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Lions or Rams player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Lions and Rams players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Lions and Rams defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2025 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Lions vs Rams Game FAQ
Who won the 2025 Lions vs Rams Week 15 game?
The Los Angeles Rams beat the Detroit Lions 41–34 in Week 15 of the 2025 season. The game was played at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, CA, on December 14, 2025. See the Rams' 2025 schedule.
What was the final score of Lions vs Rams?
The final score was Rams 41, Lions 34. The Lions led 24–17 at halftime, and the second half went Lions 10, Rams 24.
What happened in the Lions vs Rams game?
Los Angeles erased a 24–17 halftime deficit, outscoring Detroit 24–10 after the break to win 41–34. The Rams finished with a 519–396 edge in total offense and averaged 7.5 yards per play. Amon-Ra St. Brown led all players with 13 catches for 164 yards and 2 touchdowns. The Rams committed 1 turnover, the Lions none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Lions vs Rams?
Amon-Ra St. Brown led the game with 41.4 PPR fantasy points, the WR1 of Week 15, on 13 catches for 164 yards and 2 touchdowns. Puka Nacua was next with 27.9 (WR2). See Amon-Ra St. Brown's 2025 game log.
Who led Lions vs Rams in passing, rushing and receiving?
Matthew Stafford (LAR) led all passers with 24 of 38 for 368 yards, 2 touchdowns and an interception. Kyren Williams (LAR) led in rushing with 15 carries for 78 yards and 2 touchdowns. Puka Nacua (LAR) led in receiving with 9 catches for 181 yards.
How many fantasy points did Amon-Ra St. Brown score against the Rams?
Amon-Ra St. Brown scored 41.4 points in PPR leagues, 34.9 in half-PPR and 28.4 in standard scoring against the Rams in Week 15 of the 2025 season, on 13 catches for 164 yards and 2 touchdowns. He drew 47% of his team's targets.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Lions vs Rams?
Colby Parkinson outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 24.5 PPR points on 11.9 xFP (+12.6). Jahmyr Gibbs fell furthest short, with 9.8 points on 20.3 xFP (−10.5). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
How did the Rams come back to beat the Lions?
The Rams' chances of winning fell as low as 22% in the third quarter. Matthew Stafford's 26-yard touchdown pass to Colby Parkinson in the third quarter was the biggest swing of the game. They finished the comeback with a 41–34 win.
Which team won the turnover battle in Lions vs Rams?
The Lions won the turnover battle 1–0: the Rams gave the ball away 1 time and the Lions not at all. The Rams won the game anyway.
What is the all-time Lions vs Rams record?
The Rams lead the all-time series 46–43–1 across 90 meetings since 1937, including a 0–2 record in the postseason.
When did the Lions and Rams last play before this game?
Before Week 15 of 2025, they last met in the 2024 season on September 8, 2024, when the Lions beat the Rams 26–20.
Have the Lions and Rams met in the playoffs?
Yes, 2 times, most recently in the 2023 playoffs. The Lions are 2–0 against the Rams in the postseason.
What was the closing spread for Lions vs Rams?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Rams −5.5, making the Los Angeles Rams 5.5-point favorites, with a closing total of 54.5. That implied about 30.0 points for the Rams and 24.5 for the Lions.
Did Lions vs Rams go over or under the total?
The game went over. The consensus closing total was 54.5, and the teams combined for 75 points, 20.5 over the number.
Who covered the spread in Lions vs Rams?
The Rams covered by 1.5 against the closing line of Rams −5.5. The final margin was 7 points.