Final2025 Week 14
State Farm Stadium, Glendale, AZ|
Los Angeles Rams vs Arizona Cardinals, Week 14 2025
Los Angeles Rams
AwayWon
45
Arizona Cardinals
Home
17
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rams | 10 | 14 | 14 | 7 | 45 |
| Cardinals | 7 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 17 |
LAR 45 · ARI 17 Final
Passing leader
LAR · QB
23.2PPR pts
22/31, 281 YDS, 3 TD
Top fantasy scorer
ARI · WR
37.2PPR pts
11 REC, 142 YDS, 2 TD
Cardinals leader
ARI · QB
20.0PPR pts
25/44, 271 YDS, 2 TD, 1 INT
Defensive playmaker
Nate Landman
LAR
1 INT, 2 TKL
Rams 45, Cardinals 17: Los Angeles leads from start to finish
Los Angeles led 24–10 at halftime after a 14-point second quarter and outscored Arizona 21–7 after the break to win 45–17. The Rams finished with a 530–314 edge in total offense and averaged 7.9 yards per play.
The gap showed up everywhere. The Cardinals went 4-for-12 on third down and committed one turnover, while the Rams kept the ball for 35:04 and finished without a giveaway.
The two teams meet again in Week 6 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +2.8 yards/play LAR 7.9 · ARI 5.1
- +1 turnover margin LAR 0 turnovers
- +216 total yards LAR 530 · ARI 314
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Ram or Cardinal on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Rams Won
Los Angeles won the efficiency, turnover, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Rams | Stat | Cardinals |
|---|---|---|
| 7.9 | Yards per play | 5.1 |
| 0 | Turnovers | 1 |
| 530 | Total yards | 314 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 67 | Plays | 61 |
| 38% | Third-down conversion | 33% |
| 35:04 | Time of possession | 24:56 |
Scoring Summary
The Rams scored six touchdowns and one field goal; the Cardinals scored two touchdowns and one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | LAR | ARI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 12:05 | ARI | Jacoby Brissett → Michael Wilson, 19-yard TD Takes leadChad Ryland XP | 0 | 7 |
| 7:40 | LAR | Harrison Mevis 26-yard FG | 3 | 7 |
| 1:29 | LAR | Blake Corum 2-yard TD run Takes leadHarrison Mevis XP | 10 | 7 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 8:34 | ARI | Chad Ryland 38-yard FG Ties game | 10 | 10 |
| 2:47 | LAR | Kyren Williams 2-yard TD run Takes leadHarrison Mevis XP | 17 | 10 |
| 0:12 | LAR | Matthew Stafford → Puka Nacua, 28-yard TD Extends leadHarrison Mevis XP | 24 | 10 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 10:09 | LAR | Matthew Stafford → Colby Parkinson, 6-yard TD Extends leadHarrison Mevis XP | 31 | 10 |
| 0:12 | LAR | Matthew Stafford → Puka Nacua, 31-yard TD Extends leadHarrison Mevis XP | 38 | 10 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 13:46 | LAR | Blake Corum 48-yard TD run Extends leadHarrison Mevis XP | 45 | 10 |
| 11:08 | ARI | Jacoby Brissett → Michael Wilson, 14-yard TDChad Ryland XP | 45 | 17 |
Fantasy Points: Rams vs Cardinals, Week 14 2025
Fantasy leaders
- Michael WilsonARI · WR37.2 PTSWR1
- Puka NacuaLAR · WR35.7 PTSWR2
- Blake CorumLAR · RB26.1 PTSRB3
- Matthew StaffordLAR · QB23.2 PTSQB5
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.2 | QB5 | 22/31 | 281 | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 131.3 | Start/Sit → | |
| 20.0 | QB12 | 25/44 | 271 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 22 | 0 | 80.8 | Start/Sit → | |
| -0.4 | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | -4 | 0 | — |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37.2 | WR1 | WR | — | — | — | 16 | 11 | 142 | 2 | Start/Sit → | |
| 35.7 | WR2 | WR | — | — | — | 11 | 7 | 167 | 2 | Start/Sit → | |
| 26.1 | RB3 | RB | 12 | 128 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 17.7 | RB8 | RB | 13 | 84 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 12.2 | TE11 | TE | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 32 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 10.8 | TE13 | TE | — | — | — | 9 | 5 | 58 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.9 | WR48 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 29 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.4 | RB40 | RB | 7 | 16 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 18 | 0 | ||
| 5.2 | WR56 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 32 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.1 | RB44 | RB | 3 | 13 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 18 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.1 | RB47 | RB | 8 | 41 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 4.1 | TE26 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 21 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.6 | WR89 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.5 | WR92 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.5 | WR93 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.3 | WR96 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | ||
| 1.0 | TE57 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Los Angeles Rams
Snap Share
Davis AllenTE50 snaps71%
Colby ParkinsonTE48 snaps69%
Terrance FergusonTE45 snaps64%
Kyren WilliamsRB36 snaps51%
Konata MumpfieldWR32 snaps46%
Target Share31 targets
- Puka Nacua35%, 11 targets
- Davante Adams19%, 6 targets
- Colby Parkinson16%, 5 targets
- Kyren Williams6%, 2 targets
- Davis Allen6%, 2 targets
- Other16%, 5 targets
Carry Share36 carries
- Kyren Williams36%, 13 carries
- Blake Corum33%, 12 carries
- Ronnie Rivers22%, 8 carries
- Jimmy Garoppolo8%, 3 carries
Arizona Cardinals
Snap Share
Trey McBrideTE60 snaps97%
Andre BaccelliaWR49 snaps79%
Michael WilsonWR49 snaps79%
Elijah HigginsTE41 snaps66%
Michael CarterRB33 snaps53%
Target Share44 targets
- Michael Wilson36%, 16 targets
- Trey McBride20%, 9 targets
- Zonovan Knight14%, 6 targets
- Michael Carter9%, 4 targets
- Andre Baccellia7%, 3 targets
- Other14%, 6 targets
Carry Share14 carries
- Zonovan Knight50%, 7 carries
- Jacoby Brissett29%, 4 carries
- Michael Carter21%, 3 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60 | 97% | 9 | 20% | 0 | |
| 49 | 79% | 3 | 7% | 0 | |
| 49 | 79% | 16 | 36% | 0 | |
| 50 | 71% | 2 | 6% | 0 | |
| 48 | 69% | 5 | 16% | 0 | |
| 41 | 66% | 1 | 2% | 0 | |
| 45 | 64% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 33 | 53% | 4 | 9% | 3 | |
| 36 | 51% | 2 | 6% | 13 | |
| 29 | 47% | 6 | 14% | 7 | |
| 32 | 46% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 31 | 44% | 11 | 35% | 0 | |
| 30 | 43% | 6 | 19% | 0 | |
| 25 | 40% | 3 | 7% | 0 | |
| 22 | 31% | 1 | 3% | 12 | |
| 21 | 30% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 12 | 17% | 0 | 0% | 8 | |
| 12 | 17% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 11 | 16% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 9 | 15% | 1 | 2% | 0 | |
| 7 | 11% | 1 | 2% | 0 | |
| 3 | 5% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+16.9Puka Nacua35.7 PTS vs 18.8 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−8.3Bam Knight6.4 PTS vs 14.7 xFP
- Highest expected volume27.3 xFPMichael Wilson37.2 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael WilsonARI · WR | 37.2 | 27.3 | +9.9 | 79% | 36% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 16 | 36% |
| Jacoby BrissettARI · QB | 20.0 | 22.1 | −2.1 | 100% | 44 att | — | 44 | 4 | 29% | 0 | 0% |
| Puka NacuaLAR · WR | 35.7 | 18.8 | +16.9 | 44% | 35% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 11 | 35% |
| Trey McBrideARI · TE | 10.8 | 15.3 | −4.5 | 97% | 20% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 9 | 20% |
| Bam KnightARI · — | 6.4 | 14.7 | −8.3 | — | 50% car | — | 0 | 7 | 50% | 6 | 14% |
| Matthew StaffordLAR · QB | 23.2 | 13.8 | +9.4 | 83% | 31 att | — | 31 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Kyren WilliamsLAR · RB | 17.7 | 11.8 | +5.9 | 51% | 36% car | — | 0 | 13 | 36% | 2 | 6% |
| Davante AdamsLAR · WR | 6.9 | 10.2 | −3.3 | 43% | 19% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 19% |
| Blake CorumLAR · RB | 26.1 | 9.5 | +16.6 | 31% | 33% car | — | 0 | 12 | 33% | 1 | 3% |
| Michael CarterARI · RB | 5.1 | 8.8 | −3.7 | 53% | 21% car | — | 0 | 3 | 21% | 4 | 9% |
| Colby ParkinsonLAR · TE | 12.2 | 8.5 | +3.7 | 69% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 16% |
| Ronnie RiversLAR · RB | 4.1 | 5.2 | −1.1 | 17% | 22% car | — | 0 | 8 | 22% | 0 | 0% |
| Andre BaccelliaARI · WR | 1.3 | 5.1 | −3.8 | 79% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 7% |
| Jalen BrooksARI · WR | 5.2 | 5.1 | +0.1 | 40% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 7% |
| Davis AllenLAR · TE | 4.1 | 3.4 | +0.7 | 71% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
| Jimmy GaroppoloLAR · QB | -0.4 | 1.9 | −2.3 | 17% | 0 att | — | 0 | 3 | 8% | 0 | 0% |
| Elijah HigginsARI · TE | 1.0 | 1.7 | −0.7 | 66% | 2% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 2% |
| Jordan WhittingtonLAR · WR | 1.5 | 1.7 | −0.2 | 17% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Josiah DeguaraARI · TE | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 11% | 2% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 2% |
| Konata MumpfieldLAR · WR | 1.5 | 1.7 | −0.2 | 46% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Terrance FergusonLAR · TE | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 64% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Trent SherfieldARI · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 15% | 2% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 2% |
| Xavier SmithLAR · WR | 1.6 | 1.7 | −0.1 | 30% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
Team totals: Rams 31 targets and 36 carries; Cardinals 44 targets and 14 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2025 season: 1.70 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.65 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Matthew Stafford Ran hot
LAR · QB · 23.2 pts on 13.8 expected
22 of 31 passing for 281 yards, 3 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 13.8 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 26.8, 26.9, 13.2, 22.9, 13.6, 23.2
W9W10W11W12W13W14
Best score since Week 10.
Jacoby Brissett
ARI · QB · 20.0 pts on 22.1 expected
25 of 44 passing for 271 yards, 2 touchdowns, 1 interception; 4 carries for 22 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 22.1 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 24.8, 19.4, 23.9, 18.7, 20.6, 20.0
W9W10W11W12W13W14
Puka Nacua Ran hot
LAR · WR · 35.7 pts on 18.8 expected
11 targets (35% of the team's), 7 catches for 167 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 18.8 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 22.8, 17.4, 14.3, 16.7, 13.2, 35.7
W9W10W11W12W13W14
Best score since Week 4.
Kyren Williams Ran hot
LAR · RB · 17.7 pts on 11.8 expected
2 targets (6% of the team's), 2 catches for 13 yards; 13 carries (36% of the team's) for 84 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 11.8 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 17.4, 22.4, 16.6, 5.8, 13.2, 17.7
W9W10W11W12W13W14
Best score since Week 10. A touchdown in 6 of the last 8 games.
Michael Wilson Ran hot
ARI · WR · 37.2 pts on 27.3 expected
16 targets (36% of the team's), 11 catches for 142 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 27.3 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 9.1, 7.4, 33.5, 21.8, 6.6, 37.2
W9W10W11W12W13W14
Best fantasy game of the season.
Trey McBride
ARI · TE · 10.8 pts on 15.3 expected
9 targets (20% of the team's), 5 catches for 58 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 15.3 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 16.5, 27.7, 27.5, 16.9, 22.2, 10.8
W9W10W11W12W13W14
Fewest points since Week 5. A touchdown in 6 of the last 8 games.
Bam Knight Unlucky
ARI · — · 6.4 pts on 14.7 expected
6 targets (14% of the team's), 3 catches for 18 yards; 7 carries (50% of the team's) for 16 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 14.7 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Blake Corum Ran hot
LAR · RB · 26.1 pts on 9.5 expected
1 target (3% of the team's), 1 catch for 3 yards; 12 carries (33% of the team's) for 128 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 9.5 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 5.8, 5.6, 1.5, 2.4, 14.1, 26.1
W9W10W11W12W13W14
Best fantasy game of the season.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Los Angeles Rams
- ▲Stock up: Colby Parkinson played 69% of the snaps, up from a 50% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Ronnie Rivers played 17% of the snaps, up from a 1% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Davis Allen played 71% of the snaps, up from a 44% season average.
Arizona Cardinals
- ▲Stock up: Andre Baccellia played 79% of the snaps, up from a 21% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Jalen Brooks played 40% of the snaps, up from a 7% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Elijah Higgins played 66% of the snaps, up from a 34% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2025 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Rams D | Cardinals D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 15.9 | 17.6 |
| RBs | 17.4 | 25.7 |
| WRs | 32.7 | 30.2 |
| TEs | 13.0 | 16.9 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Arizona opened at 24% win probability and fell below 2% in the third quarter.
Cardinals win probability
Key Swings
- +19Brissett → Wilson, 19-yd TD25% → 44%Q1 12:05
- −9Mevis 26-yd FG46% → 37%Q1 7:40
- −20Corum 2-yd TD run39% → 19%Q1 1:29
- +9Ryland 38-yd FG20% → 29%Q2 8:34
- −19Williams 2-yd TD run30% → 11%Q2 2:47
Swing in Cardinals win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Los Angeles Rams | Measure | Arizona Cardinals |
|---|---|---|
| 67 | Plays | 61 |
| 46% | Pass rate | 77% |
| 9.1 | Yds / dropback | 5.6 |
| 6.9 | Yds / carry | 3.6 |
| 3/8 | Third downs | 4/12 |
Efficiency edge Los Angeles ran 6 more plays and gained 3.5 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- LAR Nacua 35% · Adams 19% · Parkinson 16%
- ARI Wilson 36% · McBride 20% · Knight 14%
Possession Results
| Result | LAR | ARI |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 6 | 2 |
| Field goals | 1 | 1 |
| Punts | 3 | 5 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 1 |
| Turnovers on downs | 0 | 1 |
| Missed field goals | 0 | 1 |
LAR turnover edge: +1
- The Cardinals opened the scoring on their first possession, a 5-play, 67-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
- The Rams scored touchdowns on two of their first three drives, then drained the clock with three second-half drives of four to six minutes.
All 22 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARI | Q1 15:00 | 5 | 67 | 2:55 | Touchdown |
| LAR | Q1 12:05 | 10 | 60 | 4:25 | Field goal |
| ARI | Q1 7:40 | 5 | 9 | 2:45 | Punt |
| LAR | Q1 4:55 | 6 | 74 | 3:26 | Touchdown |
| ARI | Q1 1:29 | 13 | 62 | 7:55 | Field goal |
| LAR | Q2 8:34 | 10 | 65 | 5:47 | Touchdown |
| ARI | Q2 2:47 | 3 | 0 | 1:05 | Punt |
| LAR | Q2 1:42 | 7 | 92 | 1:30 | Touchdown |
| ARI | Q2 0:12 | 4 | 20 | 0:12 | Missed FG |
| LAR | Q3 15:00 | 10 | 74 | 4:51 | Touchdown |
| ARI | Q3 10:09 | 3 | 5 | 1:02 | Punt |
| LAR | Q3 9:07 | 9 | 39 | 4:52 | Punt |
| ARI | Q3 4:15 | 3 | -1 | 1:14 | Punt |
| LAR | Q3 3:01 | 3 | 2 | 2:00 | Punt |
| ARI | Q3 1:01 | 3 | 2 | 0:43 | Interception |
| LAR | Q3 0:18 | 1 | 31 | 0:06 | Touchdown |
| ARI | Q3 0:12 | 3 | 1 | 1:16 | Punt |
| LAR | Q4 13:56 | 1 | 48 | 0:10 | Touchdown |
| ARI | Q4 13:46 | 10 | 65 | 2:38 | Touchdown |
| LAR | Q4 11:08 | 3 | 4 | 2:40 | Punt |
| ARI | Q4 8:28 | 11 | 64 | 3:11 | Downs |
| LAR | Q4 5:17 | 8 | 23 | 5:17 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Rams vs Cardinals Head-to-Head
One of the NFL's oldest matchups: the two franchises first met in 1937, when the Cardinals played in Chicago and the Rams in Cleveland, and they have been NFC West rivals since 2002.
- All-time series
- 53–41–2Rams lead, 96 meetings since 1937
- Postseason
- 2–0Rams won in 1975 and 2021
- Largest Rams win
- 34–02018
- Largest Cardinals win
- 44–62016
Since 2021
8–3 Rams lead
11 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- C
- R
- R
- R
- C
- R
- R
- C
- R
- R
- R
Oldest to newest. R = Rams win, C = Cardinals win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 6 Cardinals at Rams Upcoming
- Week 10 Rams at Cardinals Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wk 18 Cardinals at Rams, 2025 Wk 18 recap LAR 37 ARI 20 LAR W
- 2025 Wk 14 Rams at Cardinals LAR 45 ARI 17 LAR W
- 2024 Wk 17 Cardinals at Rams, 2024 Wk 17 recap LAR 13 ARI 9 LAR W
- 2024 Wk 2 Rams at Cardinals, 2024 Wk 2 recap ARI 41 LAR 10 ARI W
- 2023 Wk 12 Rams at Cardinals, 2023 Wk 12 recap LAR 37 ARI 14 LAR W
- 2023 Wk 6 Cardinals at Rams, 2023 Wk 6 recap LAR 26 ARI 9 LAR W
- 2022 Wk 10 Cardinals at Rams, 2022 Wk 10 recap ARI 27 LAR 17 ARI W
- 2022 Wk 3 Rams at Cardinals, 2022 Wk 3 recap LAR 20 ARI 12 LAR W
- 2021 Wild Card Cardinals at Rams, 2021 Wild Card recap LAR 34 ARI 11 LAR W
- 2021 Wk 14 Rams at Cardinals, 2021 Wk 14 recap LAR 30 ARI 23 LAR W
- 2021 Wk 4 Cardinals at Rams, 2021 Wk 4 recap ARI 37 LAR 20 ARI W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2025 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Rams | Stat | Cardinals |
|---|---|---|
| 12-5 | Record | 3-14 |
| 30.5 | Points per game | 20.9 |
| 394.6 | Yards per game | 325.8 |
| 6.2 | Yards per play | 5.2 |
| 20.4 | Points allowed per game | 28.7 |
| 327.5 | Yards allowed per game | 357.7 |
Rams vs Cardinals Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- LAR −9.5Rams covered by 18.5
- Total
- 49.5Over: 62 points scored (by 12.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rams | 29.5 | 45 | +15.5 |
| Cardinals | 20.0 | 17 | −3.0 |
The Rams beat their implied total and the Cardinals fell short of theirs; the Fantasy tab has the player lines behind it.
Betting Trends
Last 6 meetings: Rams 4–2 ATS, overs 4–2.
Each team's 2025 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Los Angeles Rams
- Against the spread
- 1–1
- Over/under
- 2–0
- ATS as favorite
- 1–1
- ATS on the road
- 1–1
Arizona Cardinals
- Against the spread
- 1–1
- Over/under
- 1–1
- ATS as underdog
- 1–1
- ATS at home
- 0–1
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Rams vs Cardinals Fantasy Outlook for 2026
Two meetings are left on the 2026 schedule: Week 6 in Los Angeles and Week 10 in Arizona. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Rams or Cardinals player start in Week 6? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Rams and Cardinals players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Rams and Cardinals defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere these two matchups fall in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2025 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Rams vs Cardinals Game FAQ
Who won the 2025 Rams vs Cardinals Week 14 game?
The Los Angeles Rams beat the Arizona Cardinals 45–17 in Week 14 of the 2025 season. The game was played at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, AZ, on December 7, 2025. See the Rams' 2025 schedule.
What was the final score of Rams vs Cardinals?
The final score was Rams 45, Cardinals 17. The Rams led 24–10 at halftime, and the second half went Rams 21, Cardinals 7.
What happened in the Rams vs Cardinals game?
Los Angeles led 24–10 at halftime after a 14-point second quarter and outscored Arizona 21–7 after the break to win 45–17. The Rams finished with a 530–314 edge in total offense and averaged 7.9 yards per play. Michael Wilson led all players with 11 catches for 142 yards and 2 touchdowns. The Cardinals committed 1 turnover, the Rams none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Rams vs Cardinals?
Michael Wilson led the game with 37.2 PPR fantasy points, the WR1 of Week 14, on 11 catches for 142 yards and 2 touchdowns. Puka Nacua was next with 35.7 (WR2). See Michael Wilson's 2025 game log.
Who led Rams vs Cardinals in passing, rushing and receiving?
Matthew Stafford (LAR) led all passers with 22 of 31 for 281 yards and 3 touchdowns. Blake Corum (LAR) led in rushing with 12 carries for 128 yards and 2 touchdowns. Puka Nacua (LAR) led in receiving with 7 catches for 167 yards and 2 touchdowns.
How many fantasy points did Michael Wilson score against the Rams?
Michael Wilson scored 37.2 points in PPR leagues, 31.7 in half-PPR and 26.2 in standard scoring against the Rams in Week 14 of the 2025 season, on 11 catches for 142 yards and 2 touchdowns. He drew 36% of his team's targets.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Rams vs Cardinals?
Puka Nacua outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 35.7 PPR points on 18.8 xFP (+16.9). Bam Knight fell furthest short, with 6.4 points on 14.7 xFP (−8.3). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
How did the Rams beat the Cardinals?
The Rams beat the Cardinals 45–17 because they averaged 7.9 yards per play to 5.1, won the turnover battle 1–0, and outgained them 530–314.
Which team won the turnover battle in Rams vs Cardinals?
The Rams won the turnover battle 1–0: the Cardinals gave the ball away 1 time and the Rams not at all. The Rams won the game.
What is the all-time Rams vs Cardinals record?
The Rams lead the all-time series 53–41–2 across 96 meetings since 1937, including a 2–0 record in the postseason.
When did the Rams and Cardinals last play before this game?
Before Week 14 of 2025, they last met in the 2024 season on December 28, 2024, when the Rams beat the Cardinals 13–9.
Have the Rams and Cardinals met in the playoffs?
Yes, 2 times, most recently in the 2021 playoffs. The Rams are 2–0 against the Cardinals in the postseason.
What was the closing spread for Rams vs Cardinals?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Rams −9.5, making the Los Angeles Rams 9.5-point favorites, with a closing total of 49.5. That implied about 29.5 points for the Rams and 20.0 for the Cardinals.
Did Rams vs Cardinals go over or under the total?
The game went over. The consensus closing total was 49.5, and the teams combined for 62 points, 12.5 over the number.
Who covered the spread in Rams vs Cardinals?
The Rams covered by 18.5 against the closing line of Rams −9.5. The final margin was 28 points.
