Final2022 Week 11
Reliant Stadium, Houston, TX|
Washington Commanders vs Houston Texans, Week 11 2022
Washington Commanders
AwayWon
23
Houston Texans
Home
10
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commanders | 7 | 13 | 0 | 3 | 23 |
| Texans | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 10 |
WAS 23 · HOU 10 Final
Passing leader
Taylor Heinicke
WAS · QB
7.8PPR pts
15/27, 191 YDS
Top fantasy scorer
Antonio Gibson
WAS · RB
13.3PPR pts
18 ATT, 72 YDS, 3 REC, 31 REC YDS
Texans leader
HOU · QB
11.8PPR pts
19/33, 169 YDS, 2 INT, 1 RUSH TD
Defensive playmaker
Kendall Fuller
WAS
1 INT, 1 TD, 4 TKL
Commanders 23, Texans 10: Washington beats Houston
Washington led 20–0 at halftime and won 23–10, though Houston took the second half 10–3. The Commanders finished with a 344–148 edge in total offense and averaged 5.1 yards per play.
Houston didn't get on the board until the third quarter.
The gap showed up everywhere. The Texans went 2-for-13 on third down and committed two turnovers, while the Commanders kept the ball for 34:56 and finished without a giveaway.
The two teams meet again in Week 14 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +2.4 yards/play WAS 5.1 · HOU 2.7
- +2 turnover margin WAS 0 turnovers
- +196 total yards WAS 344 · HOU 148
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Commander or Texan on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Commanders Won
Washington won the efficiency, turnover, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Commanders | Stat | Texans |
|---|---|---|
| 5.1 | Yards per play | 2.7 |
| 0 | Turnovers | 2 |
| 344 | Total yards | 148 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 67 | Plays | 54 |
| 23% | Third-down conversion | 15% |
| 34:56 | Time of possession | 25:04 |
Scoring Summary
The Commanders scored two touchdowns and three field goals; the Texans scored one touchdown and one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | WAS | HOU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 13:16 | WAS | Kendall Fuller 37-yard interception return TD Takes leadJoey Slye XP | 7 | 0 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 11:44 | WAS | Curtis Samuel 10-yard TD run Extends leadJoey Slye XP | 14 | 0 |
| 4:53 | WAS | Joey Slye 25-yard FG Extends lead | 17 | 0 |
| 0:07 | WAS | Joey Slye 24-yard FG Extends lead | 20 | 0 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 9:53 | HOU | Ka'imi Fairbairn 29-yard FG | 20 | 3 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 12:08 | WAS | Joey Slye 44-yard FG Extends lead | 23 | 3 |
| 3:19 | HOU | Davis Mills 4-yard TD runKa'imi Fairbairn XP | 23 | 10 |
Fantasy Points: Commanders vs Texans, Week 11 2022
Fantasy leaders
- Antonio GibsonWAS · RB13.3 PTSRB17
- Davis MillsHOU · QB11.8 PTSQB19
- Logan ThomasWAS · TE11.5 PTSTE8
- Brandin CooksHOU · WR10.0 PTSWR39
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.8 | QB24 | 15/27 | 191 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 77.9 | ||
| 11.8 | QB19 | 19/33 | 169 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 1 | 46.1 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13.3 | RB17 | RB | 18 | 72 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 31 | 0 | ||
| 11.5 | TE8 | TE | — | — | — | 6 | 5 | 65 | 0 | ||
| 10.0 | WR39 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 3 | 70 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.8 | WR40 | WR | 2 | 18 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 0 | ||
| 9.8 | WR41 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 5 | 48 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.6 | WR43 | WR | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 55 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.3 | WR48 | WR | 1 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 20 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.7 | RB38 | RB | 15 | 57 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 3.7 | RB45 | RB | 10 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.8 | TE34 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 8 | 0 | ||
| 2.7 | WR81 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 17 | 0 | ||
| 2.6 | WR82 | WR | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.9 | TE39 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 9 | 0 | ||
| 1.5 | RB58 | RB | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fantasy Usage
Washington Commanders
Snap Share
Terry McLaurinWR49 snaps72%
Logan ThomasTE46 snaps68%
Antonio GibsonRB46 snaps68%
Jahan DotsonWR45 snaps66%
Curtis SamuelWR41 snaps60%
Target Share23 targets
- Terry McLaurin30%, 7 targets
- Logan Thomas26%, 6 targets
- Antonio Gibson13%, 3 targets
- Curtis Samuel9%, 2 targets
- Jahan Dotson9%, 2 targets
- Other13%, 3 targets
Carry Share40 carries
- Antonio Gibson45%, 18 carries
- Brian Robinson38%, 15 carries
- Taylor Heinicke8%, 3 carries
- Curtis Samuel5%, 2 carries
- Terry McLaurin3%, 1 carries
- Other3%, 1 carries
Houston Texans
Snap Share
Nico CollinsWR48 snaps86%
Brandin CooksWR45 snaps80%
Dameon PierceRB43 snaps77%
Teagan QuitorianoTE37 snaps66%
Chris MooreWR33 snaps59%
Target Share32 targets
- Chris Moore22%, 7 targets
- Nico Collins22%, 7 targets
- Brandin Cooks19%, 6 targets
- O.J. Howard9%, 3 targets
- Jordan Akins9%, 3 targets
- Other19%, 6 targets
Carry Share16 carries
- Dameon Pierce63%, 10 carries
- Davis Mills31%, 5 carries
- Chris Moore6%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48 | 86% | 7 | 22% | 0 | |
| 45 | 80% | 6 | 19% | 0 | |
| 43 | 77% | 3 | 9% | 10 | |
| 49 | 72% | 7 | 30% | 1 | |
| 46 | 68% | 6 | 26% | 0 | |
| 46 | 68% | 3 | 13% | 18 | |
| 45 | 66% | 2 | 9% | 1 | |
| 37 | 66% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 41 | 60% | 2 | 9% | 2 | |
| 33 | 59% | 7 | 22% | 1 | |
| 35 | 51% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 26 | 46% | 3 | 9% | 0 | |
| 26 | 38% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 23 | 34% | 0 | 0% | 15 | |
| 18 | 26% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 14 | 25% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 14 | 25% | 3 | 9% | 0 | |
| 9 | 16% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 7 | 13% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 6 | 9% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 5 | 7% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 4 | 7% | 1 | 3% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+5.2Curtis Samuel9.8 PTS vs 4.6 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−7.7Dameon Pierce3.7 PTS vs 11.4 xFP
- Highest expected volume17.2 xFPDavis Mills11.8 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis MillsHOU · QB | 11.8 | 17.2 | −5.4 | 100% | 33 att | — | 33 | 5 | 31% | 0 | 0% |
| Antonio GibsonWAS · RB | 13.3 | 16.6 | −3.3 | 68% | 45% car | — | 0 | 18 | 45% | 3 | 13% |
| Taylor HeinickeWAS · QB | 7.8 | 13.4 | −5.6 | 100% | 27 att | — | 27 | 3 | 8% | 0 | 0% |
| Chris MooreHOU · WR | 7.3 | 12.3 | −5.0 | 59% | 22% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 6% | 7 | 22% |
| Terry McLaurinWAS · WR | 9.6 | 12.3 | −2.7 | 72% | 30% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 7 | 30% |
| Nico CollinsHOU · WR | 9.8 | 11.7 | −1.9 | 86% | 22% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 22% |
| Dameon PierceHOU · RB | 3.7 | 11.4 | −7.7 | 77% | 63% car | — | 0 | 10 | 63% | 3 | 9% |
| Brandin CooksHOU · WR | 10.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 | 80% | 19% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 19% |
| Logan ThomasWAS · TE | 11.5 | 10.0 | +1.5 | 68% | 26% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 26% |
| Brian Robinson Jr.WAS · RB | 5.7 | 9.7 | −4.0 | 34% | 38% car | — | 0 | 15 | 38% | 0 | 0% |
| Jordan AkinsHOU · TE | 2.8 | 5.0 | −2.2 | 46% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 9% |
| O.J. HowardHOU · TE | 1.9 | 5.0 | −3.1 | 25% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 9% |
| Curtis SamuelWAS · WR | 9.8 | 4.6 | +5.2 | 60% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 2 | 5% | 2 | 9% |
| Jahan DotsonWAS · WR | 2.6 | 4.0 | −1.4 | 66% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 2 | 9% |
| Cam SimsWAS · WR | 2.7 | 1.7 | +1.0 | 26% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Cole TurnerWAS · TE | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 38% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Dare OgunbowaleHOU · RB | 1.5 | 1.7 | −0.2 | 7% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| John BatesWAS · TE | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 51% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Phillip Dorsett IIHOU · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 25% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Teagan QuitorianoHOU · TE | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 66% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
Team totals: Commanders 23 targets and 40 carries; Texans 32 targets and 16 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2022 season: 1.67 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.64 per carry and 0.42 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Taylor Heinicke Unlucky
WAS · QB · 7.8 pts on 13.4 expected
15 of 27 passing for 191 yards; 3 carries for 2 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 13.4 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 15.4, 23.1, 14.7, 6.4, 7.8
W7W8W9W10W11
No interceptions after 4 in the previous four games.
Davis Mills Unlucky
HOU · QB · 11.8 pts on 17.2 expected
19 of 33 passing for 169 yards, 2 interceptions; 5 carries for 10 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 17.2 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 5.8, 19.1, 9.9, 14.0, 15.8, 11.8
W5W7W8W9W10W11
Antonio Gibson
WAS · RB · 13.3 pts on 16.6 expected
3 targets (13% of the team's), 3 catches for 31 yards; 18 carries (45% of the team's) for 72 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 16.6 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 8.3, 16.7, 20.7, 6.7, 14.8, 13.3
W6W7W8W9W10W11
Season high in carries (18).
Terry McLaurin Volume, no payoff
WAS · WR · 9.6 pts on 12.3 expected
7 targets (30% of the team's), 4 catches for 55 yards; 1 carry (3% of the team's) for 1 yard.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 12.3 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 8.2, 18.3, 16.6, 10.6, 20.8, 9.6
W6W7W8W9W10W11
Fewest points since Week 6.
Chris Moore Unlucky
HOU · WR · 7.3 pts on 12.3 expected
7 targets (22% of the team's), 5 catches for 20 yards; 1 carry (6% of the team's) for 3 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 12.3 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 0.0, 10.0, 0.0, 14.5, 10.0, 7.3
W4W7W8W9W10W11
Season high in targets (7).
Nico Collins
HOU · WR · 9.8 pts on 11.7 expected
7 targets (22% of the team's), 5 catches for 48 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 11.7 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 6.1, 11.2, 10.5, 6.3, 15.9, 9.8
W3W4W5W7W10W11
Dameon Pierce Volume, no payoff
HOU · RB · 3.7 pts on 11.4 expected
3 targets (9% of the team's), 2 catches for 9 yards; 10 carries (63% of the team's) for 8 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 11.4 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 20.3, 15.7, 14.1, 13.9, 12.2, 3.7
W5W7W8W9W10W11
Lowest-scoring game of the season.
Curtis Samuel Ran hot
WAS · WR · 9.8 pts on 4.6 expected
2 targets (9% of the team's), 1 catch for 10 yards; 2 carries (5% of the team's) for 18 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 4.6 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 2.6, 12.9, 10.9, 17.1, 6.0, 9.8
W6W7W8W9W10W11
Stock Up, Stock Down
Washington Commanders
- ▲Stock up: Antonio Gibson played 68% of the snaps, up from a 44% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Terry McLaurin played 72% of the snaps, down from a 93% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Curtis Samuel played 60% of the snaps, down from a 79% season average.
Houston Texans
- ▲Stock up: Nico Collins played 86% of the snaps, up from a 69% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Teagan Quitoriano played 66% of the snaps, up from a 36% season average.
- ▼Stock down: O.J. Howard played 25% of the snaps, down from a 47% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2022 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Commanders D | Texans D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 16.6 | 13.6 |
| RBs | 17.2 | 30.7 |
| WRs | 32.1 | 25.7 |
| TEs | 9.1 | 11.6 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Houston opened at 41% win probability and fell below 2% before halftime.
Texans win probability
Key Swings
- −19Fuller 37-yd pick-six41% → 23%Q1 13:16
- −13Samuel 10-yd TD run21% → 8%Q2 11:44
- −3Slye 25-yd FG6% → 3%Q2 4:53
- −1Slye 24-yd FG3% → 1%Q2 0:07
- +1Fairbairn 29-yd FG1% → 2%Q3 9:53
Swing in Texans win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Washington Commanders | Measure | Houston Texans |
|---|---|---|
| 67 | Plays | 54 |
| 40% | Pass rate | 70% |
| 7.1 | Yds / dropback | 3.3 |
| 3.8 | Yds / carry | 1.3 |
| 3/13 | Third downs | 2/13 |
Efficiency edge Washington ran 13 more plays and gained 3.8 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- WAS McLaurin 30% · Thomas 26% · Gibson 13%
- HOU Moore 22% · Collins 22% · Cooks 19%
Possession Results
| Result | WAS | HOU |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 1 | 1 |
| Field goals | 3 | 1 |
| Punts | 5 | 6 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 2 |
WAS turnover edge: +2
- The Commanders opened the scoring on their fourth possession, a 9-play, 85-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
All 21 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAS | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 1 | 1:09 | Punt |
| HOU | Q1 13:51 | 2 | 0 | 0:35 | Interception |
| HOU | Q1 13:16 | 3 | -4 | 1:38 | Punt |
| WAS | Q1 11:38 | 3 | 4 | 1:35 | Punt |
| HOU | Q1 10:03 | 3 | 9 | 1:35 | Punt |
| WAS | Q1 8:28 | 7 | 36 | 3:35 | Punt |
| HOU | Q1 4:53 | 6 | 4 | 2:58 | Punt |
| WAS | Q1 1:55 | 9 | 85 | 5:11 | Touchdown |
| HOU | Q2 11:44 | 3 | -11 | 2:01 | Punt |
| WAS | Q2 9:43 | 10 | 54 | 4:50 | Field goal |
| HOU | Q2 4:53 | 3 | -2 | 1:53 | Punt |
| WAS | Q2 3:00 | 11 | 61 | 2:53 | Field goal |
| HOU | Q2 0:07 | 1 | -1 | 0:07 | End of half |
| HOU | Q3 15:00 | 11 | 64 | 5:07 | Field goal |
| WAS | Q3 9:53 | 6 | 15 | 3:27 | Punt |
| HOU | Q3 6:26 | 6 | 3 | 2:47 | Punt |
| WAS | Q3 3:39 | 10 | 20 | 6:31 | Field goal |
| HOU | Q4 12:08 | 6 | 27 | 2:03 | Interception |
| WAS | Q4 10:05 | 4 | 11 | 2:26 | Punt |
| HOU | Q4 7:39 | 11 | 55 | 4:20 | Touchdown |
| WAS | Q4 3:19 | 7 | 38 | 3:19 | End of game |
About these numbers
The Commanders' interception touchdown is counted as a Texans interception, not as a Commanders possession. Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Commanders vs Texans Head-to-Head
The Commanders and Texans first met in 2002 and have played 6 times since.
- All-time series
- 3–3Series tied, 6 meetings since 2002
- Postseason
- 0No playoff meetings
- Largest Commanders win
- 31–152006
- Largest Texans win
- 17–62014
Since 2021
1–0 Commanders lead
1 meeting since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- C
Oldest to newest. C = Commanders win, T = Texans win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 14 Texans at Commanders Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2022 Wk 11 Commanders at Texans WAS 23 HOU 10 WAS W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2022 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Commanders | Stat | Texans |
|---|---|---|
| 8-8-1 | Record | 3-13-1 |
| 18.9 | Points per game | 17.0 |
| 330.3 | Yards per game | 283.5 |
| 4.9 | Yards per play | 4.7 |
| 20.2 | Points allowed per game | 24.7 |
| 304.6 | Yards allowed per game | 379.5 |
Commanders vs Texans Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- WAS −3Commanders covered by 10
- Total
- 41Under: 33 points scored (by 8)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commanders | 22.0 | 23 | +1.0 |
| Texans | 19.0 | 10 | −9.0 |
The Commanders beat their implied total and the Texans fell short of theirs; the Fantasy tab has the player lines behind it.
Betting Trends
Each team's 2022 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Washington Commanders
- Against the spread
- 6–4–1
- Over/under
- 4–7
- ATS as favorite
- 3–2
- ATS as underdog
- 3–2–1
- ATS on the road
- 4–2
Houston Texans
- Against the spread
- 4–5–1
- Over/under
- 4–6
- ATS as underdog
- 4–5–1
- ATS at home
- 2–3
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Commanders vs Texans Fantasy Outlook for 2026
One meeting is left on the 2026 schedule: Week 14 in Washington. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Commanders or Texans player start in Week 14? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Commanders and Texans players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Commanders and Texans defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere this matchup falls in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2022 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Commanders vs Texans Game FAQ
Who won the 2022 Commanders vs Texans Week 11 game?
The Washington Commanders beat the Houston Texans 23–10 in Week 11 of the 2022 season. The game was played at Reliant Stadium in Houston, TX, on November 20, 2022. See the Commanders' 2022 schedule.
What was the final score of Commanders vs Texans?
The final score was Commanders 23, Texans 10. The Commanders led 20–0 at halftime, and the second half went Commanders 3, Texans 10.
What happened in the Commanders vs Texans game?
Washington led 20–0 at halftime and won 23–10, though Houston took the second half 10–3. The Commanders finished with a 344–148 edge in total offense and averaged 5.1 yards per play. Antonio Gibson led all players with 3 catches for 31 yards, plus 18 carries for 72 rushing yards. The Texans committed 2 turnovers, the Commanders none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Commanders vs Texans?
Antonio Gibson led the game with 13.3 PPR fantasy points, the RB17 of Week 11, on 3 catches for 31 yards, plus 18 carries for 72 rushing yards. Davis Mills was next with 11.8 (QB19).
Who led Commanders vs Texans in passing, rushing and receiving?
Taylor Heinicke (WAS) led all passers with 15 of 27 for 191 yards. Antonio Gibson (WAS) led in rushing with 18 carries for 72 yards. Brandin Cooks (HOU) led in receiving with 3 catches for 70 yards.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Commanders vs Texans?
Curtis Samuel outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 9.8 PPR points on 4.6 xFP (+5.2). Dameon Pierce fell furthest short, with 3.7 points on 11.4 xFP (−7.7). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Commanders vs Texans?
Davis Mills had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 17.2 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 11.8. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Commanders beat the Texans?
The Commanders beat the Texans 23–10 because they averaged 5.1 yards per play to 2.7, won the turnover battle 2–0, and outgained them 344–148.
Which team won the turnover battle in Commanders vs Texans?
The Commanders won the turnover battle 2–0: the Texans gave the ball away 2 times and the Commanders not at all. The Commanders won the game.
What is the all-time Commanders vs Texans record?
The all-time series is tied 3–3 across 6 meetings since 2002.
When did the Commanders and Texans last play before this game?
Before Week 11 of 2022, they last met in the 2018 season on November 18, 2018, when the Texans beat the Commanders 23–21.
What was the closing spread for Commanders vs Texans?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Commanders −3, making the Washington Commanders 3-point favorites, with a closing total of 41. That implied about 22.0 points for the Commanders and 19.0 for the Texans.
Did Commanders vs Texans go over or under the total?
The game went under. The consensus closing total was 41, and the teams combined for 33 points, 8 under the number.
Who covered the spread in Commanders vs Texans?
The Commanders covered by 10 against the closing line of Commanders −3. The final margin was 13 points.
