Final2021 Week 11
Soldier Field, Chicago, IL|
Baltimore Ravens vs Chicago Bears, Week 11 2021
Baltimore Ravens
AwayWon
16
Chicago Bears
Home
13
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ravens | 0 | 6 | 0 | 10 | 16 |
| Bears | 0 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 13 |
BAL 16 · CHI 13 Final
Passing leader
BAL · QB
11.8PPR pts
26/36, 219 YDS, 1 INT
Top fantasy scorer
CHI · WR
23.1PPR pts
5 REC, 121 YDS, 1 TD
Bears leader
Marquise Goodwin
CHI · WR
20.4PPR pts
4 REC, 104 YDS, 1 TD
Defensive playmaker
Tashaun Gipson Sr.
CHI
1 INT, 4 TKL
Ravens 16, Bears 13: Baltimore rallies in the fourth quarter
Baltimore led 6–0 at halftime and won 16–13, though Chicago took the second half 13–10. Chicago outgained the Ravens 353–299.
Chicago didn't get on the board until the third quarter.
The Bears went 2-for-11 on third down and committed one turnover, while the Ravens kept the ball for 38:50.
Key advantages
- +26% third-down rate BAL 44% · CHI 18%
- +17:40 time of possession BAL 38:50 · CHI 21:10
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Raven or Bear on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Ravens Won
Baltimore won the third-down and time of possession battles.
| Ravens | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Third-down conversion | 18% |
| 38:50 | Time of possession | 21:10 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 299 | Total yards | 353 |
| 3.9 | Yards per play | 6.2 |
| 76 | Plays | 57 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 1 |
Scoring Summary
The Ravens scored one touchdown and three field goals; the Bears scored two touchdowns.
| Time | Team | Play | BAL | CHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| No scoring | ||||
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 2:11 | BAL | Justin Tucker 35-yard FG Takes lead | 3 | 0 |
| 0:02 | BAL | Justin Tucker 27-yard FG Extends lead | 6 | 0 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 8:02 | CHI | Andy Dalton → Darnell Mooney, 60-yard TD Takes leadCairo Santos XP | 6 | 7 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 3:41 | BAL | Justin Tucker 46-yard FG Takes lead | 9 | 7 |
| 1:41 | CHI | Andy Dalton → Marquise Goodwin, 49-yard TD Takes lead2-pt try failed | 9 | 13 |
| 0:22 | BAL | Devonta Freeman 3-yard TD run Game winnerJustin Tucker XP | 16 | 13 |
Fantasy Points: Ravens vs Bears, Week 11 2021
Fantasy leaders
- Darnell MooneyCHI · WR23.1 PTSWR5
- Marquise GoodwinCHI · WR20.4 PTSWR12
- Devonta FreemanBAL · RB20.0 PTSRB9
- Andy DaltonCHI · QB16.0 PTSQB15
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.8 | QB19 | 26/36 | 219 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 40 | 0 | 76.0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 16.0 | QB15 | 11/23 | 201 | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 107.3 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.5 | QB30 | 4/11 | 79 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 23 | 0 | 62.3 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.1 | WR5 | WR | — | — | — | 16 | 5 | 121 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 20.4 | WR12 | WR | — | — | — | 8 | 4 | 104 | 1 | ||
| 20.0 | RB9 | RB | 16 | 49 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 31 | 0 | ||
| 15.3 | TE5 | TE | — | — | — | 10 | 8 | 73 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.8 | WR46 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 48 | 0 | ||
| 7.7 | RB26 | RB | 14 | 58 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.7 | WR48 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 37 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.9 | WR58 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 3 | 29 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.3 | RB39 | RB | 10 | 32 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 4.5 | TE30 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 25 | 0 | ||
| 2.7 | WR86 | WR | 1 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | ||
| 2.2 | TE42 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 12 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.3 | WR101 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | RB | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fantasy Usage
Baltimore Ravens
Snap Share
Sammy WatkinsWR60 snaps74%
Mark AndrewsTE58 snaps72%
Rashod BatemanWR57 snaps70%
Devonta FreemanRB47 snaps58%
Devin DuvernayWR44 snaps54%
Target Share35 targets
- Mark Andrews29%, 10 targets
- Devonta Freeman17%, 6 targets
- Devin Duvernay17%, 6 targets
- Rashod Bateman17%, 6 targets
- Sammy Watkins11%, 4 targets
- Other9%, 3 targets
Carry Share33 carries
- Devonta Freeman48%, 16 carries
- Latavius Murray30%, 10 carries
- Tyler Huntley21%, 7 carries
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
David MontgomeryRB56 snaps95%
Darnell MooneyWR54 snaps92%
Cole KmetTE53 snaps90%
Marquise GoodwinWR42 snaps71%
Damiere ByrdWR37 snaps63%
Target Share33 targets
- Darnell Mooney48%, 16 targets
- Marquise Goodwin24%, 8 targets
- Jimmy Graham9%, 3 targets
- Damiere Byrd6%, 2 targets
- Cole Kmet6%, 2 targets
- Other6%, 2 targets
Carry Share20 carries
- David Montgomery70%, 14 carries
- Justin Fields20%, 4 carries
- Jakeem Grant5%, 1 carries
- Khalil Herbert5%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 56 | 95% | 1 | 3% | 14 | |
| 54 | 92% | 16 | 48% | 0 | |
| 53 | 90% | 2 | 6% | 0 | |
| 60 | 74% | 4 | 11% | 0 | |
| 58 | 72% | 10 | 29% | 0 | |
| 42 | 71% | 8 | 24% | 0 | |
| 57 | 70% | 6 | 17% | 0 | |
| 37 | 63% | 2 | 6% | 0 | |
| 47 | 58% | 6 | 17% | 16 | |
| 44 | 54% | 6 | 17% | 0 | |
| 32 | 40% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 30 | 37% | 2 | 6% | 10 | |
| 19 | 32% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 12 | 20% | 3 | 9% | 0 | |
| 12 | 15% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 12 | 15% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 8 | 14% | 1 | 3% | 1 | |
| 7 | 12% | 0 | 0% | 1 | |
| 4 | 7% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 5 | 6% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+6.9Marquise Goodwin20.4 PTS vs 13.5 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−8.5Tyler Huntley11.8 PTS vs 20.3 xFP
- Highest expected volume26.9 xFPDarnell Mooney23.1 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darnell MooneyCHI · WR | 23.1 | 26.9 | −3.8 | 92% | 48% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 16 | 48% |
| Devonta FreemanBAL · RB | 20.0 | 20.4 | −0.4 | 58% | 47% car | — | 0 | 16 | 47% | 6 | 17% |
| Tyler HuntleyBAL · QB | 11.8 | 20.3 | −8.5 | 100% | 36 att | — | 36 | 7 | 21% | 0 | 0% |
| Mark AndrewsBAL · TE | 15.3 | 16.8 | −1.5 | 72% | 28% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 10 | 28% |
| Marquise GoodwinCHI · WR | 20.4 | 13.5 | +6.9 | 71% | 24% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 24% |
| David MontgomeryCHI · RB | 7.7 | 10.7 | −3.0 | 95% | 70% car | — | 0 | 14 | 70% | 1 | 3% |
| Andy DaltonCHI · QB | 16.0 | 10.1 | +5.9 | 49% | 23 att | — | 23 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Devin DuvernayBAL · WR | 7.7 | 10.1 | −2.4 | 54% | 17% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 17% |
| Rashod BatemanBAL · WR | 5.9 | 10.1 | −4.2 | 70% | 17% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 17% |
| Latavius MurrayBAL · RB | 5.3 | 9.8 | −4.5 | 37% | 29% car | — | 0 | 10 | 29% | 2 | 6% |
| Justin FieldsCHI · QB | 3.5 | 7.4 | −3.9 | 51% | 11 att | — | 11 | 4 | 20% | 0 | 0% |
| Sammy WatkinsBAL · WR | 7.8 | 6.7 | +1.1 | 74% | 11% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 11% |
| Jimmy GrahamCHI · TE | 4.5 | 5.1 | −0.6 | 20% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 9% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 2.2 | 3.4 | −1.2 | 90% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
| Damiere ByrdCHI · WR | 1.3 | 3.4 | −2.1 | 63% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
| Jakeem Grant Sr.CHI · WR | 2.7 | 2.3 | +0.4 | 14% | 5% car | — | 0 | 1 | 5% | 1 | 3% |
| Patrick RicardBAL · RB | 0.2 | 2.3 | −2.1 | — | 3% car | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 1 | 3% |
| Nick BoyleBAL · TE | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 40% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Khalil HerbertCHI · RB | 0.0 | 0.6 | −0.6 | 12% | 5% car | — | 0 | 1 | 5% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Ravens 36 targets and 34 carries; Bears 33 targets and 20 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2021 season: 1.68 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.64 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Tyler Huntley Unlucky
BAL · QB · 11.8 pts on 20.3 expected
26 of 36 passing for 219 yards, 1 interception; 7 carries for 40 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 20.3 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Start/Sit: Tyler Huntley →Andy Dalton Ran hot
CHI · QB · 16.0 pts on 10.1 expected
11 of 23 passing for 201 yards, 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 10.1 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 5.5, 8.7, 0.3, 16.0
W1W2W5W11
Best fantasy game of the season.
Devonta Freeman
BAL · RB · 20.0 pts on 20.4 expected
6 targets (17% of the team's), 6 catches for 31 yards; 16 carries (47% of the team's) for 49 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 20.4 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 6.5, 11.3, 12.9, 16.3, 8.8, 20.0
W5W6W7W9W10W11
Season high in targets (6). Season high in carries (16).
Mark Andrews
BAL · TE · 15.3 pts on 16.8 expected
10 targets (28% of the team's), 8 catches for 73 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 16.8 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 41.7, 17.8, 6.8, 9.4, 18.3, 15.3
W5W6W7W9W10W11
Darnell Mooney Volume, no payoff
CHI · WR · 23.1 pts on 26.9 expected
16 targets (48% of the team's), 5 catches for 121 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 26.9 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 6.5, 15.5, 5.9, 12.4, 20.6, 23.1
W5W6W7W8W9W11
Season high in targets (16). Best fantasy game of the season.
Marquise Goodwin Ran hot
CHI · WR · 20.4 pts on 13.5 expected
8 targets (24% of the team's), 4 catches for 104 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 13.5 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 1.8, 2.2, 3.6, 5.2, 6.0, 20.4
W5W6W7W8W9W11
Season high in targets (8). Best fantasy game of the season.
Latavius Murray
BAL · RB · 5.3 pts on 9.8 expected
2 targets (6% of the team's), 2 catches for 1 yard; 10 carries (29% of the team's) for 32 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 9.8 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 9.6, 2.8, 11.9, 5.0, 13.6, 5.3
W2W3W4W5W6W11
David Montgomery Volume, no payoff
CHI · RB · 7.7 pts on 10.7 expected
1 target (3% of the team's), 1 catch for 9 yards; 14 carries (70% of the team's) for 58 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 10.7 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 18.8, 10.9, 7.5, 22.6, 10.0, 7.7
W1W2W3W4W9W11
Stock Up, Stock Down
Baltimore Ravens
- ▲Stock up: Devonta Freeman led the backfield with 58% of the snaps after trailing Latavius Murray before this game.
- ▼Stock down: Latavius Murray lost the backfield lead: 37% of the snaps to Devonta Freeman's 58%.
Chicago Bears
- ▲Stock up: Marquise Goodwin played 71% of the snaps, up from a 43% season average.
- ▲Stock up: David Montgomery played 95% of the snaps, up from a 74% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Damiere Byrd played 63% of the snaps, up from a 41% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2021 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Ravens D | Bears D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 19.5 | 17.7 |
| RBs | 20.8 | 21.5 |
| WRs | 38.2 | 34.4 |
| TEs | 15.4 | 8.7 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Chicago opened at 47% win probability, climbed as high as >99%, then lost.
Bears win probability
Key Swings
- −12Tucker 35-yd FG48% → 36%Q2 2:11
- +31Dalton → Mooney, 60-yd TD22% → 53%Q3 8:02
- −34Tucker 46-yd FG61% → 27%Q4 3:41
- +78Dalton → Goodwin, 49-yd TD18% → 96%Q4 1:41
- −100Freeman 3-yd TD run>99% → <1%Q4 0:22
Swing in Bears win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Baltimore Ravens | Measure | Chicago Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 76 | Plays | 57 |
| 55% | Pass rate | 65% |
| 4.2 | Yds / dropback | 7.1 |
| 3.6 | Yds / carry | 4.6 |
| 7/16 | Third downs | 2/11 |
Efficiency edge Baltimore ran 19 more plays than Chicago.
- Top targets
- BAL Andrews 28% · Duvernay 17% · Freeman 17%
- CHI Mooney 48% · Goodwin 24% · Graham 9%
Possession Results
| Result | BAL | CHI |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 1 | 2 |
| Field goals | 3 | 0 |
| Punts | 6 | 5 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 1 |
| Turnovers on downs | 0 | 1 |
| Missed field goals | 0 | 1 |
- The Ravens opened the scoring on their fourth possession, a 10-play, 49-yard drive that ended in a field goal.
All 23 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAL | Q1 15:00 | 7 | 24 | 4:02 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 10:58 | 10 | 64 | 4:59 | Missed FG |
| BAL | Q1 5:59 | 6 | 8 | 4:04 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 1:55 | 3 | 3 | 0:58 | Punt |
| BAL | Q1 0:57 | 8 | 25 | 4:52 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 11:05 | 5 | 44 | 2:38 | Fumble |
| BAL | Q2 8:27 | 10 | 49 | 6:16 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q2 2:11 | 5 | 15 | 1:04 | Punt |
| BAL | Q2 1:07 | 11 | 55 | 1:05 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q2 0:02 | 1 | 5 | 0:02 | End of half |
| CHI | Q3 15:00 | 6 | 26 | 3:38 | Punt |
| BAL | Q3 11:22 | 7 | 33 | 2:36 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 8:46 | 2 | 83 | 0:44 | Touchdown |
| BAL | Q3 8:02 | 3 | 6 | 1:45 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 6:17 | 5 | 16 | 1:11 | Punt |
| BAL | Q3 5:06 | 9 | 1 | 5:48 | Punt |
| CHI | Q4 14:18 | 4 | 9 | 1:52 | Downs |
| BAL | Q4 12:26 | 6 | 27 | 3:15 | Interception |
| CHI | Q4 9:11 | 3 | 3 | 1:42 | Punt |
| BAL | Q4 7:29 | 7 | 17 | 3:48 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q4 3:41 | 10 | 75 | 2:00 | Touchdown |
| BAL | Q4 1:41 | 5 | 72 | 1:19 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q4 0:22 | 4 | 5 | 0:22 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Ravens vs Bears Head-to-Head
The Ravens and Bears first met in 1998 and have played 8 times since.
- All-time series
- 4–4Series tied, 8 meetings since 1998
- Postseason
- 0No playoff meetings
- Largest Ravens win
- 31–72009
- Largest Bears win
- 24–31998
Since 2021
2–0 Ravens lead
2 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- R
- R
Oldest to newest. R = Ravens win, B = Bears win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wk 8 Bears at Ravens, 2025 Wk 8 recap BAL 30 CHI 16 BAL W
- 2021 Wk 11 Ravens at Bears BAL 16 CHI 13 BAL W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2021 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Ravens | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 8-9 | Record | 6-11 |
| 22.8 | Points per game | 18.3 |
| 378.8 | Yards per game | 307.4 |
| 5.4 | Yards per play | 4.9 |
| 23.1 | Points allowed per game | 23.9 |
| 363.4 | Yards allowed per game | 316.7 |
Ravens vs Bears Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- BAL −1Ravens covered by 2
- Total
- 40.5Under: 29 points scored (by 11.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ravens | 20.8 | 16 | −4.8 |
| Bears | 19.8 | 13 | −6.8 |
Both offenses finished under the market's expectation, which matches the low fantasy output in the Fantasy tab.
Betting Trends
Each team's 2021 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Baltimore Ravens
- Against the spread
- 4–6
- Over/under
- 5–5
- ATS as favorite
- 2–6
- ATS as underdog
- 2–0
- ATS on the road
- 2–3
Chicago Bears
- Against the spread
- 4–6
- Over/under
- 3–7
- ATS as favorite
- 2–0
- ATS as underdog
- 2–6
- ATS at home
- 2–3
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Ravens and Bears in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Raven or a Bear, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Ravens or Bears player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Ravens and Bears players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Ravens and Bears defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2021 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Ravens vs Bears Game FAQ
Who won the 2021 Ravens vs Bears Week 11 game?
The Baltimore Ravens beat the Chicago Bears 16–13 in Week 11 of the 2021 season. The game was played at Soldier Field in Chicago, IL, on November 21, 2021. See the Ravens' 2021 schedule.
What was the final score of Ravens vs Bears?
The final score was Ravens 16, Bears 13. The Ravens led 6–0 at halftime, and the second half went Ravens 10, Bears 13.
What happened in the Ravens vs Bears game?
Baltimore led 6–0 at halftime and won 16–13, though Chicago took the second half 13–10. Chicago outgained the Ravens 353–299. Darnell Mooney led all players with 5 catches for 121 yards and a touchdown.
What was the game-winning score in Ravens vs Bears?
Devonta Freeman's 3-yard touchdown run with 0:22 left in the fourth quarter gave the Ravens a 16–13 lead they never gave up. It was the final score of the game.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Ravens vs Bears?
Darnell Mooney led the game with 23.1 PPR fantasy points, the WR5 of Week 11, on 5 catches for 121 yards and a touchdown. Marquise Goodwin was next with 20.4 (WR12). See Darnell Mooney's 2021 game log.
Who led Ravens vs Bears in passing, rushing and receiving?
Tyler Huntley (BAL) led all passers with 26 of 36 for 219 yards and an interception. David Montgomery (CHI) led in rushing with 14 carries for 58 yards. Darnell Mooney (CHI) led in receiving with 5 catches for 121 yards and a touchdown.
How many fantasy points did Darnell Mooney score against the Ravens?
Darnell Mooney scored 23.1 points in PPR leagues, 20.6 in half-PPR and 18.1 in standard scoring against the Ravens in Week 11 of the 2021 season, on 5 catches for 121 yards and a touchdown. He drew 48% of his team's targets.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Ravens vs Bears?
Marquise Goodwin outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 20.4 PPR points on 13.5 xFP (+6.9). Tyler Huntley fell furthest short, with 11.8 points on 20.3 xFP (−8.5). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Ravens vs Bears?
Darnell Mooney had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 26.9 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 23.1. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Ravens come back to beat the Bears?
The Ravens' chances of winning fell as low as <1% in the fourth quarter. Devonta Freeman's 3-yard touchdown run in the fourth quarter was the biggest swing of the game. Devonta Freeman's 3-yard touchdown run then put them ahead for good.
What is the all-time Ravens vs Bears record?
The all-time series is tied 4–4 across 8 meetings since 1998.
When did the Ravens and Bears last play before this game?
Before Week 11 of 2021, they last met in the 2017 season on October 15, 2017, when the Bears beat the Ravens 27–24.
What was the closing spread for Ravens vs Bears?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Ravens −1, making the Baltimore Ravens 1-point favorites, with a closing total of 40.5. That implied about 20.8 points for the Ravens and 19.8 for the Bears.
Did Ravens vs Bears go over or under the total?
The game went under. The consensus closing total was 40.5, and the teams combined for 29 points, 11.5 under the number.
Who covered the spread in Ravens vs Bears?
The Ravens covered by 2 against the closing line of Ravens −1. The final margin was 3 points.
