Final2024 Week 5
Soldier Field, Chicago, IL|
Carolina Panthers vs Chicago Bears, Week 5 2024
Carolina Panthers
Away
10
Chicago Bears
HomeWon
36
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Panthers | 7 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 |
| Bears | 7 | 20 | 3 | 6 | 36 |
CAR 10 · CHI 36 Final
Passing leader
CHI · QB
23.6PPR pts
20/29, 304 YDS, 2 TD
Top fantasy scorer
CHI · WR
27.5PPR pts
5 REC, 105 YDS, 2 TD
Panthers leader
CAR · RB
17.5PPR pts
13 ATT, 97 YDS, 1 TD, 4 REC, -2 REC YDS
Defensive playmaker
Kevin Byard
CHI
1 INT, 6 TKL
Bears 36, Panthers 10: Chicago beats Carolina
Chicago led 27–7 at halftime after a 20-point second quarter and outscored Carolina 9–3 after the break to win 36–10. The Bears finished with a 424–292 edge in total offense and averaged 6.1 yards per play.
The gap showed up everywhere. The Panthers went 3-for-12 on third down and committed three turnovers, while the Bears kept the ball for 33:48 and finished without a giveaway.
Key advantages
- +1.1 yards/play CHI 6.1 · CAR 5.0
- +3 turnover margin CHI 0 turnovers
- +132 total yards CHI 424 · CAR 292
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Panther or Bear on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Bears Won
Chicago won the efficiency, turnover, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Panthers | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | Yards per play | 6.1 |
| 3 | Turnovers | 0 |
| 292 | Total yards | 424 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 58 | Plays | 69 |
| 25% | Third-down conversion | 36% |
| 26:12 | Time of possession | 33:48 |
Scoring Summary
The Bears scored five touchdowns and one field goal; the Panthers scored one touchdown and one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | CAR | CHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 8:54 | CAR | Chuba Hubbard 38-yard TD run Takes leadEddy Pineiro XP | 7 | 0 |
| 5:44 | CHI | Caleb Williams → DJ Moore, 34-yard TD Ties gameCairo Santos XP | 7 | 7 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 10:44 | CHI | Roschon Johnson 1-yard TD run Takes leadCairo Santos XP | 7 | 14 |
| 2:14 | CHI | D'Andre Swift 1-yard TD run Extends leadCairo Santos XP | 7 | 21 |
| 0:24 | CHI | Caleb Williams → DJ Moore, 30-yard TD Extends leadXP missed | 7 | 27 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 6:25 | CHI | Cairo Santos 33-yard FG Extends lead | 7 | 30 |
| 2:10 | CAR | Eddy Pineiro 27-yard FG | 10 | 30 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 4:23 | CHI | Roschon Johnson 1-yard TD run Extends lead2-pt try failed | 10 | 36 |
Fantasy Points: Panthers vs Bears, Week 5 2024
Fantasy leaders
- DJ MooreCHI · WR27.5 PTSWR6
- Caleb WilliamsCHI · QB23.6 PTSQB6
- D'Andre SwiftCHI · RB20.0 PTSRB2
- Chuba HubbardCAR · RB17.5 PTSRB8
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.6 | QB6 | 20/29 | 304 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 34 | 0 | 126.2 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.7 | QB28 | 18/28 | 136 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 61.0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.1 | QB29 | 4/7 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 84.2 | Start/Sit → | |
| -0.4 | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | -4 | 0 | — | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27.5 | WR6 | WR | — | — | — | 8 | 5 | 105 | 2 | Start/Sit → | |
| 20.0 | RB2 | RB | 21 | 73 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 47 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 17.5 | RB8 | RB | 13 | 97 | 1 | 4 | 4 | -2 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 14.5 | RB16 | RB | 10 | 25 | 2 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 10.8 | WR43 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 68 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.0 | WR46 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 5 | 40 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.7 | TE20 | TE | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 57 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.3 | WR56 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 3 | 33 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.9 | WR58 | WR | 2 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 23 | 0 | ||
| 5.7 | WR59 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 2 | 37 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.3 | RB47 | RB | 2 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 27 | 0 | ||
| 4.3 | TE31 | TE | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 13 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.2 | TE32 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 22 | 0 | ||
| 3.3 | WR77 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 13 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.8 | WR90 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| -0.3 | — | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Carolina Panthers
Snap Share
Diontae JohnsonWR48 snaps80%
Ja'Tavion SandersTE45 snaps75%
Jonathan MingoWR41 snaps68%
Chuba HubbardRB39 snaps65%
Jalen CokerWR32 snaps53%
Target Share33 targets
- Diontae Johnson18%, 6 targets
- Jonathan Mingo15%, 5 targets
- Ja'Tavion Sanders15%, 5 targets
- Chuba Hubbard12%, 4 targets
- Jalen Coker12%, 4 targets
- Other27%, 9 targets
Carry Share19 carries
- Chuba Hubbard68%, 13 carries
- Diontae Johnson11%, 2 carries
- Miles Sanders11%, 2 carries
- Andy Dalton5%, 1 carries
- Bryce Young5%, 1 carries
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
DJ MooreWR66 snaps88%
Cole KmetTE63 snaps84%
Keenan AllenWR61 snaps81%
Rome OdunzeWR60 snaps80%
D'Andre SwiftRB50 snaps67%
Target Share28 targets
- DJ Moore29%, 8 targets
- Keenan Allen21%, 6 targets
- Rome Odunze21%, 6 targets
- Cole Kmet14%, 4 targets
- Gerald Everett7%, 2 targets
- Other7%, 2 targets
Carry Share39 carries
- D'Andre Swift54%, 21 carries
- Roschon Johnson26%, 10 carries
- Caleb Williams13%, 5 carries
- Tyson Bagent8%, 3 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 66 | 88% | 8 | 29% | 0 | |
| 63 | 84% | 4 | 14% | 0 | |
| 61 | 81% | 6 | 21% | 0 | |
| 60 | 80% | 6 | 21% | 0 | |
| 48 | 80% | 6 | 18% | 2 | |
| 45 | 75% | 5 | 15% | 0 | |
| 41 | 68% | 5 | 15% | 0 | |
| 50 | 67% | 2 | 7% | 21 | |
| 39 | 65% | 4 | 12% | 13 | |
| 32 | 53% | 4 | 12% | 0 | |
| 24 | 40% | 3 | 9% | 0 | |
| 23 | 38% | 3 | 9% | 2 | |
| 22 | 37% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 23 | 31% | 0 | 0% | 10 | |
| 22 | 29% | 2 | 7% | 0 | |
| 17 | 28% | 2 | 6% | 0 | |
| 17 | 23% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 4 | 7% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 3 | 5% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 3 | 4% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 3 | 4% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+13.8DJ Moore27.5 PTS vs 13.7 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−8.4Andy Dalton4.7 PTS vs 13.1 xFP
- Highest expected volume17.1 xFPD'Andre Swift20.0 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D'Andre SwiftCHI · RB | 20.0 | 17.1 | +2.9 | 67% | 54% car | — | 0 | 21 | 54% | 2 | 7% |
| Caleb WilliamsCHI · QB | 23.6 | 16.2 | +7.4 | 96% | 29 att | — | 29 | 5 | 13% | 0 | 0% |
| Chuba HubbardCAR · RB | 17.5 | 15.3 | +2.2 | 65% | 68% car | — | 0 | 13 | 68% | 4 | 12% |
| DJ MooreCHI · WR | 27.5 | 13.7 | +13.8 | 88% | 29% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 29% |
| Andy DaltonCAR · QB | 4.7 | 13.1 | −8.4 | 85% | 28 att | — | 28 | 1 | 5% | 0 | 0% |
| Diontae JohnsonCAR · WR | 5.9 | 11.6 | −5.7 | 80% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 2 | 11% | 6 | 18% |
| Keenan AllenCHI · WR | 6.3 | 10.3 | −4.0 | 81% | 21% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 21% |
| Rome OdunzeCHI · WR | 9.0 | 10.3 | −1.3 | 80% | 21% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 21% |
| Ja'Tavion SandersCAR · TE | 4.3 | 8.6 | −4.3 | 75% | 15% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 15% |
| Jonathan MingoCAR · WR | 5.7 | 8.6 | −2.9 | 68% | 15% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 15% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 8.7 | 6.9 | +1.8 | 84% | 14% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 14% |
| Jalen CokerCAR · WR | 10.8 | 6.9 | +3.9 | 53% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 12% |
| Roschon JohnsonCHI · RB | 14.5 | 6.5 | +8.0 | 31% | 26% car | — | 0 | 10 | 26% | 0 | 0% |
| Miles SandersCAR · RB | 5.3 | 6.4 | −1.1 | 38% | 11% car | — | 0 | 2 | 11% | 3 | 9% |
| David MooreCAR · WR | 3.3 | 5.1 | −1.8 | 40% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 9% |
| Bryce YoungCAR · QB | 3.1 | 3.8 | −0.7 | 15% | 7 att | — | 7 | 1 | 5% | 0 | 0% |
| Gerald EverettCHI · TE | 4.2 | 3.4 | +0.8 | 29% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Tommy TrembleCAR · TE | -0.3 | 3.4 | −3.7 | 28% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
| Tyson BagentCHI · QB | -0.4 | 2.0 | −2.4 | 4% | 0 att | — | 0 | 3 | 8% | 0 | 0% |
| Xavier LegetteCAR · WR | 1.8 | 1.7 | +0.1 | 37% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
Team totals: Panthers 33 targets and 19 carries; Bears 28 targets and 39 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2024 season: 1.71 PPR points per target (68% catch rate), 0.65 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Andy Dalton Unlucky
CAR · QB · 4.7 pts on 13.1 expected
18 of 28 passing for 136 yards, 1 interception; 1 carry for 3 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 13.1 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 0.0, 24.6, 16.7, 4.7
W1W3W4W5
Caleb Williams Ran hot
CHI · QB · 23.6 pts on 16.2 expected
20 of 29 passing for 304 yards, 2 touchdowns; 5 carries for 34 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 16.2 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 7.2, 9.4, 19.3, 11.5, 23.6
W1W2W3W4W5
No interceptions after 4 in the previous four games. Best fantasy game of the season.
Chuba Hubbard Strong role
CAR · RB · 17.5 pts on 15.3 expected
4 targets (12% of the team's), 4 catches for -2 yards; 13 carries (68% of the team's) for 97 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 15.3 expected.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 1.4, 11.6, 27.9, 22.1, 17.5
W1W2W3W4W5
Diontae Johnson Unlucky
CAR · WR · 5.9 pts on 11.6 expected
6 targets (18% of the team's), 3 catches for 23 yards; 2 carries (11% of the team's) for 6 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 11.6 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 3.9, 4.5, 26.2, 21.3, 5.9
W1W2W3W4W5
D'Andre Swift
CHI · RB · 20.0 pts on 17.1 expected
2 targets (7% of the team's), 2 catches for 47 yards; 21 carries (54% of the team's) for 73 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 17.1 expected.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 5.0, 8.2, 6.2, 29.5, 20.0
W1W2W3W4W5
Season high in carries (21).
DJ Moore Ran hot
CHI · WR · 27.5 pts on 13.7 expected
8 targets (29% of the team's), 5 catches for 105 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 13.7 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 10.0, 11.3, 15.2, 11.2, 27.5
W1W2W3W4W5
Best fantasy game of the season.
Roschon Johnson Ran hot
CHI · RB · 14.5 pts on 6.5 expected
10 carries (26% of the team's) for 25 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 6.5 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Trend: Season high in carries (10).
Ja'Tavion Sanders
CAR · TE · 4.3 pts on 8.6 expected
5 targets (15% of the team's), 3 catches for 13 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 8.6 expected.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 1.4, 2.8, 0.0, 3.6, 4.3
W1W2W3W4W5
Best fantasy game of the season.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Carolina Panthers
- ▲Stock up: Ja'Tavion Sanders played 75% of the snaps, up from a 47% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Jalen Coker played 53% of the snaps, up from a 10% season average.
- ▲Stock up: David Moore played 40% of the snaps, up from a 19% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2024 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Panthers D | Bears D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 20.9 | 13.8 |
| RBs | 30.0 | 25.2 |
| WRs | 34.2 | 28.9 |
| TEs | 14.8 | 12.3 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Chicago opened at 50% win probability and passed 98% before halftime on the way to the win.
Bears win probability
Key Swings
- −21Hubbard 38-yd TD run50% → 29%Q1 8:54
- +21Williams → Moore, 34-yd TD29% → 50%Q1 5:44
- +24Johnson 1-yd TD run50% → 74%Q2 10:44
- +16Swift 1-yd TD run76% → 92%Q2 2:14
- +5Williams → Moore, 30-yd TD93% → 98%Q2 0:24
Swing in Bears win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Carolina Panthers | Measure | Chicago Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 58 | Plays | 69 |
| 67% | Pass rate | 43% |
| 4.4 | Yds / dropback | 9.9 |
| 6.3 | Yds / carry | 3.3 |
| 3/12 | Third downs | 4/11 |
Efficiency edge Chicago ran 11 more plays and gained 5.5 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- CAR Johnson 18% · Sanders 15% · Mingo 15%
- CHI Moore 29% · Allen 21% · Odunze 21%
Possession Results
| Result | CAR | CHI |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 1 | 5 |
| Field goals | 1 | 1 |
| Punts | 4 | 4 |
| Turnovers | 3 | 0 |
| Turnovers on downs | 2 | 1 |
| Missed field goals | 1 | 0 |
CHI turnover edge: +3
- The Panthers opened the scoring on their second possession, a 5-play, 51-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
- The Bears scored touchdowns on two of their first three drives.
All 24 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAR | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 5 | 1:39 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 13:21 | 3 | -5 | 1:42 | Punt |
| CAR | Q1 11:39 | 5 | 51 | 2:45 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q1 8:54 | 7 | 70 | 3:10 | Touchdown |
| CAR | Q1 5:44 | 5 | 5 | 3:33 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 2:11 | 13 | 80 | 6:27 | Touchdown |
| CAR | Q2 10:44 | 3 | 5 | 2:24 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 8:20 | 9 | 36 | 4:02 | Downs |
| CAR | Q2 4:18 | 3 | 5 | 1:29 | Fumble |
| CHI | Q2 2:49 | 3 | 44 | 0:35 | Touchdown |
| CAR | Q2 2:14 | 6 | 20 | 1:19 | Downs |
| CHI | Q2 0:55 | 5 | 62 | 0:31 | Touchdown |
| CAR | Q2 0:24 | 4 | 43 | 0:24 | Missed FG |
| CHI | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 7 | 2:47 | Punt |
| CAR | Q3 12:13 | 2 | -4 | 1:11 | Interception |
| CHI | Q3 11:02 | 11 | 51 | 4:37 | Field goal |
| CAR | Q3 6:25 | 10 | 61 | 4:15 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q3 2:10 | 3 | 8 | 1:38 | Punt |
| CAR | Q3 0:32 | 5 | 30 | 3:30 | Punt |
| CHI | Q4 12:02 | 5 | 32 | 3:16 | Punt |
| CAR | Q4 8:46 | 5 | 10 | 1:16 | Fumble |
| CHI | Q4 7:30 | 5 | 18 | 3:07 | Touchdown |
| CAR | Q4 4:23 | 9 | 64 | 2:27 | Downs |
| CHI | Q4 1:56 | 3 | -4 | 1:56 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Panthers vs Bears Head-to-Head
The Panthers and Bears first met in 1995 and have played 14 times since.
- All-time series
- 10–4Bears lead, 14 meetings since 1995
- Postseason
- 1–0Panthers won in 2005
- Largest Panthers win
- 24–142002
- Largest Bears win
- 36–102024
Since 2021
3–0 Bears lead
3 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- B
- B
- B
Oldest to newest. B = Bears win, P = Panthers win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2026 Wk 1 Bears at Panthers, 2026 Wk 1 recap CHI 59 CAR 37 CHI W
- 2024 Wk 5 Panthers at Bears CHI 36 CAR 10 CHI W
- 2023 Wk 10 Panthers at Bears, 2023 Wk 10 recap CHI 16 CAR 13 CHI W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2024 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Panthers | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 5-12 | Record | 5-12 |
| 20.1 | Points per game | 18.2 |
| 298.0 | Yards per game | 283.5 |
| 5.1 | Yards per play | 4.5 |
| 31.4 | Points allowed per game | 21.8 |
| 404.5 | Yards allowed per game | 354.2 |
Panthers and Bears in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Panther or a Bear, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Panthers or Bears player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Panthers and Bears players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Panthers and Bears defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2024 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Panthers vs Bears Game FAQ
Who won the 2024 Panthers vs Bears Week 5 game?
The Chicago Bears beat the Carolina Panthers 36–10 in Week 5 of the 2024 season. The game was played at Soldier Field in Chicago, IL, on October 6, 2024. See the Bears' 2024 schedule.
What was the final score of Panthers vs Bears?
The final score was Bears 36, Panthers 10. The Bears led 27–7 at halftime, and the second half went Panthers 3, Bears 9.
What happened in the Panthers vs Bears game?
Chicago led 27–7 at halftime after a 20-point second quarter and outscored Carolina 9–3 after the break to win 36–10. The Bears finished with a 424–292 edge in total offense and averaged 6.1 yards per play. DJ Moore led all players with 5 catches for 105 yards and 2 touchdowns. The Panthers committed 3 turnovers, the Bears none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Panthers vs Bears?
DJ Moore led the game with 27.5 PPR fantasy points, the WR6 of Week 5, on 5 catches for 105 yards and 2 touchdowns. Caleb Williams was next with 23.6 (QB6). See DJ Moore's 2024 game log.
Who led Panthers vs Bears in passing, rushing and receiving?
Caleb Williams (CHI) led all passers with 20 of 29 for 304 yards and 2 touchdowns. Chuba Hubbard (CAR) led in rushing with 13 carries for 97 yards and a touchdown. DJ Moore (CHI) led in receiving with 5 catches for 105 yards and 2 touchdowns.
How many fantasy points did DJ Moore score against the Panthers?
DJ Moore scored 27.5 points in PPR leagues, 25.0 in half-PPR and 22.5 in standard scoring against the Panthers in Week 5 of the 2024 season, on 5 catches for 105 yards and 2 touchdowns. He drew 29% of his team's targets.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Panthers vs Bears?
DJ Moore outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 27.5 PPR points on 13.7 xFP (+13.8). Andy Dalton fell furthest short, with 4.7 points on 13.1 xFP (−8.4). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Panthers vs Bears?
D'Andre Swift had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 17.1 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 20.0. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Bears beat the Panthers?
The Bears beat the Panthers 36–10 because they averaged 6.1 yards per play to 5.0, won the turnover battle 3–0, and outgained them 424–292.
Which team won the turnover battle in Panthers vs Bears?
The Bears won the turnover battle 3–0: the Panthers gave the ball away 3 times and the Bears not at all. The Bears won the game.
What is the all-time Panthers vs Bears record?
The Bears lead the all-time series 10–4 across 14 meetings since 1995, including a 0–1 record in the postseason.
When did the Panthers and Bears last play before this game?
Before Week 5 of 2024, they last met in the 2023 season on November 9, 2023, when the Bears beat the Panthers 16–13.
Have the Panthers and Bears met in the playoffs?
Yes, 1 time, most recently in the 2005 playoffs. The Panthers are 1–0 against the Bears in the postseason.
What is the Panthers vs Bears record since 2021?
The Bears lead 3–0 across 3 meetings since the 2021 season, including this game.
