Final2026 Week 1
Bank of America Stadium, Charlotte, NC|
Carolina Panthers vs Chicago Bears
Chicago Bears
AwayWon
59
Carolina Panthers
Home
37
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bears | 14 | 17 | 14 | 14 | 59 |
| Panthers | 7 | 17 | 7 | 6 | 37 |
CHI 59 · CAR 37 Final
Passing leader
CAR · QB
32.4PPR pts
23/37, 361 YDS, 3 TD, 1 INT, 1 RUSH TD
Top fantasy scorer
CAR · WR
33.8PPR pts
8 REC, 138 YDS, 2 TD
Panthers leader
CAR · RB
23.7PPR pts
10 ATT, 49 YDS, 1 TD, 3 REC, 38 REC YDS, 1 REC TD
Defensive playmaker
Malik Muhammad II
CHI
1 INT, 3 TKL
Bears 59, Panthers 37: Chicago leads from start to finish
Chicago led 31–24 at halftime after a 17-point second quarter and outscored Carolina 28–13 after the break to win 59–37. The Bears finished with a 552–478 edge in total offense and averaged 7.9 yards per play.
The gap showed up everywhere. The Panthers went 4-for-9 on third down and committed three turnovers, while the Bears kept the ball for 34:03.
Key advantages
- +0.2 yards/play CHI 7.9 · CAR 7.7
- +2 turnover margin CHI 1 · CAR 3 turnovers
- +74 total yards CHI 552 · CAR 478
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Bear or Panther on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Bears Won
Chicago won the efficiency, turnover, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Bears | Stat | Panthers |
|---|---|---|
| 7.9 | Yards per play | 7.7 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 3 |
| 552 | Total yards | 478 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 70 | Plays | 62 |
| 71% | Third-down conversion | 44% |
| 34:03 | Time of possession | 25:57 |
Scoring Summary
The Bears scored eight touchdowns and one field goal; the Panthers scored five touchdowns and one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | CHI | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 11:33 | CAR | Bryce Young → Chuba Hubbard, 4-yard TD Takes leadRyan Fitzgerald XP | 0 | 7 |
| 5:52 | CHI | Caleb Williams 9-yard TD run Ties gameCairo Santos XP | 7 | 7 |
| 1:59 | CHI | D'Andre Swift 1-yard TD run Takes leadCairo Santos XP | 14 | 7 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 13:57 | CHI | Caleb Williams → Cole Kmet, 22-yard TD Extends leadCairo Santos XP | 21 | 7 |
| 12:40 | CAR | Bryce Young → Jalen Coker, 51-yard TDRyan Fitzgerald XP | 21 | 14 |
| 8:42 | CAR | Bryce Young 7-yard TD run Ties gameRyan Fitzgerald XP | 21 | 21 |
| 5:20 | CHI | Cairo Santos 40-yard FG Takes lead | 24 | 21 |
| 2:35 | CAR | Ryan Fitzgerald 44-yard FG Ties game | 24 | 24 |
| 0:22 | CHI | Caleb Williams 29-yard TD run Takes leadCairo Santos XP | 31 | 24 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 9:02 | CAR | Chuba Hubbard 2-yard TD run Ties gameRyan Fitzgerald XP | 31 | 31 |
| 3:05 | CHI | D'Andre Swift 1-yard TD run Takes leadCairo Santos XP | 38 | 31 |
| 0:40 | CHI | Kyle Monangai 61-yard TD run Extends leadCairo Santos XP | 45 | 31 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 6:27 | CHI | Caleb Williams → Jahdae Walker, 1-yard TD Extends leadCairo Santos XP | 52 | 31 |
| 4:00 | CAR | Bryce Young → Jalen Coker, 8-yard TDXP missed | 52 | 37 |
| 3:40 | CHI | D'Andre Swift 28-yard TD run Extends leadCairo Santos XP | 59 | 37 |
Fantasy Points: Bears vs Panthers, Week 1 2026
Fantasy leaders
- Caleb WilliamsCHI · QB37.3 PTSQB1
- Jalen CokerCAR · WR33.8 PTSWR1
- D'Andre SwiftCHI · RB32.4 PTSRB5
- Bryce YoungCAR · QB32.4 PTSQB3
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32.4 | QB3 | 23/37 | 361 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 110.3 | Start/Sit → | |
| 37.3 | QB1 | 21/29 | 269 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 65 | 2 | 124.1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.4 | QB33 | 0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 0 | 39.6 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33.8 | WR1 | WR | — | — | — | 9 | 8 | 138 | 2 | Start/Sit → | |
| 32.4 | RB5 | RB | 18 | 124 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 23.7 | RB10 | RB | 10 | 49 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 38 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 20.4 | RB11 | RB | 10 | 100 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 16.4 | WR15 | WR | — | — | — | 9 | 8 | 84 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 11.5 | TE11 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 35 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 10.5 | WR32 | WR | — | — | — | 8 | 5 | 75 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.5 | WR37 | WR | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 63 | 0 | ||
| 7.2 | RB38 | RB | 4 | 14 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 48 | 0 | ||
| 7.2 | WR54 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 52 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.1 | WR56 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.5 | TE27 | TE | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 25 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.8 | TE30 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 28 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.8 | RB59 | RB | 5 | 28 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.9 | TE50 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 9 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| -2.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fantasy Usage
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Colston LovelandTE65 snaps87%
Luther BurdenWR55 snaps73%
Kalif RaymondWR45 snaps60%
D'Andre SwiftRB43 snaps57%
Cole KmetTE43 snaps57%
Target Share26 targets
- Kalif Raymond35%, 9 targets
- Luther Burden19%, 5 targets
- Cole Kmet12%, 3 targets
- Rome Odunze12%, 3 targets
- Colston Loveland8%, 2 targets
- Other15%, 4 targets
Carry Share39 carries
- D'Andre Swift46%, 18 carries
- Caleb Williams26%, 10 carries
- Kyle Monangai26%, 10 carries
- Luther Burden3%, 1 carries
Carolina Panthers
Snap Share
Jalen CokerWR57 snaps84%
Tetairoa McMillanWR56 snaps82%
Chuba HubbardRB48 snaps71%
Tommy TrembleTE38 snaps56%
Xavier LegetteWR36 snaps53%
Target Share34 targets
- Jalen Coker26%, 9 targets
- Tetairoa McMillan24%, 8 targets
- Tommy Tremble15%, 5 targets
- Chuba Hubbard9%, 3 targets
- Darren Waller6%, 2 targets
- Other21%, 7 targets
Carry Share22 carries
- Chuba Hubbard45%, 10 carries
- AJ Dillon23%, 5 carries
- Jonathon Brooks18%, 4 carries
- Bryce Young9%, 2 carries
- Kenny Pickett5%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 65 | 87% | 2 | 8% | 0 | |
| 57 | 84% | 9 | 26% | 0 | |
| 56 | 82% | 8 | 24% | 0 | |
| 55 | 73% | 5 | 19% | 1 | |
| 48 | 71% | 3 | 9% | 10 | |
| 45 | 60% | 9 | 35% | 0 | |
| 43 | 57% | 1 | 4% | 18 | |
| 43 | 57% | 3 | 12% | 0 | |
| 38 | 56% | 5 | 15% | 0 | |
| 36 | 53% | 2 | 6% | 0 | |
| 36 | 48% | 3 | 12% | 0 | |
| 34 | 45% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 32 | 43% | 2 | 8% | 10 | |
| 27 | 40% | 2 | 6% | 0 | |
| 24 | 35% | 2 | 6% | 0 | |
| 13 | 19% | 2 | 6% | 4 | |
| 12 | 18% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 12 | 16% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 10 | 13% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 7 | 10% | 0 | 0% | 5 | |
| 5 | 7% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+19.8D'Andre Swift32.4 PTS vs 12.6 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−3.7Jimmy Horn Jr.-2.0 PTS vs 1.7 xFP
- Highest expected volume19.6 xFPCaleb Williams37.3 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caleb WilliamsCHI · QB | 37.3 | 19.6 | +17.7 | 100% | 29 att | — | 29 | 10 | 26% | 0 | 0% |
| Bryce YoungCAR · QB | 32.4 | 18.5 | +13.9 | 90% | 37 att | — | 37 | 2 | 9% | 0 | 0% |
| Jalen CokerCAR · WR | 33.8 | 15.7 | +18.1 | 84% | 26% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 9 | 26% |
| Kalif RaymondCHI · WR | 16.4 | 15.7 | +0.7 | 60% | 35% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 9 | 35% |
| Tetairoa McMillanCAR · WR | 10.5 | 14.0 | −3.5 | 82% | 24% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 24% |
| D'Andre SwiftCHI · RB | 32.4 | 12.6 | +19.8 | 57% | 46% car | — | 0 | 18 | 46% | 1 | 4% |
| Chuba HubbardCAR · RB | 23.7 | 11.3 | +12.4 | 71% | 45% car | — | 0 | 10 | 45% | 3 | 9% |
| Kyle MonangaiCHI · RB | 20.4 | 9.5 | +10.9 | 43% | 26% car | — | 0 | 10 | 26% | 2 | 8% |
| Luther Burden IIICHI · WR | 9.5 | 9.3 | +0.2 | 73% | 19% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 5 | 19% |
| Tommy TrembleCAR · TE | 5.5 | 8.7 | −3.2 | 56% | 15% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 15% |
| Jonathon BrooksCAR · RB | 7.2 | 5.9 | +1.3 | 19% | 18% car | — | 0 | 4 | 18% | 2 | 6% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 11.5 | 5.2 | +6.3 | 57% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 12% |
| Rome OdunzeCHI · WR | 7.2 | 5.2 | +2.0 | 48% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 12% |
| Colston LovelandCHI · TE | 0.0 | 3.5 | −3.5 | 87% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 8% |
| Darren WallerCAR · TE | 4.8 | 3.5 | +1.3 | 35% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
| Mitchell EvansCAR · TE | 1.9 | 3.5 | −1.6 | 40% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
| Xavier LegetteCAR · WR | 0.0 | 3.5 | −3.5 | 53% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
| AJ DillonCAR · RB | 2.8 | 3.0 | −0.2 | 10% | 23% car | — | 0 | 5 | 23% | 0 | 0% |
| Jahdae WalkerCHI · WR | 7.1 | 1.7 | +5.4 | 45% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Jimmy Horn Jr.CAR · WR | -2.0 | 1.7 | −3.7 | — | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Kenny PickettCAR · QB | 2.4 | 1.1 | +1.3 | 10% | 1 att | — | 1 | 1 | 5% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Bears 26 targets and 39 carries; Panthers 34 targets and 22 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2026 season: 1.75 PPR points per target (68% catch rate), 0.60 per carry and 0.47 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Caleb Williams Ran hot
CHI · QB · 37.3 pts on 19.6 expected
21 of 29 passing for 269 yards, 2 touchdowns; 10 carries for 65 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 19.6 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 4 against the Jets. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Caleb Williams →Bryce Young Ran hot
CAR · QB · 32.4 pts on 18.5 expected
23 of 37 passing for 361 yards, 3 touchdowns, 1 interception; 2 carries for 10 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 18.5 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 4 against the Lions. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Bryce Young →Kalif Raymond Strong role
CHI · WR · 16.4 pts on 15.7 expected
9 targets (35% of the team's), 8 catches for 84 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 15.7 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Jets. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Kalif Raymond →D'Andre Swift Ran hot
CHI · RB · 32.4 pts on 12.6 expected
1 target (4% of the team's), 1 catch for 10 yards; 18 carries (46% of the team's) for 124 yards and 3 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 12.6 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 4 against the Jets. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: D'Andre Swift →Jalen Coker Ran hot
CAR · WR · 33.8 pts on 15.7 expected
9 targets (26% of the team's), 8 catches for 138 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 15.7 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 4 against the Lions. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Jalen Coker →Tetairoa McMillan
CAR · WR · 10.5 pts on 14.0 expected
8 targets (24% of the team's), 5 catches for 75 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 14.0 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Lions. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Tetairoa McMillan →Chuba Hubbard Ran hot
CAR · RB · 23.7 pts on 11.3 expected
3 targets (9% of the team's), 3 catches for 38 yards and 1 touchdown; 10 carries (45% of the team's) for 49 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 11.3 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 4 against the Lions. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Chuba Hubbard →Kyle Monangai Ran hot
CHI · RB · 20.4 pts on 9.5 expected
2 targets (8% of the team's), 2 catches for 24 yards; 10 carries (26% of the team's) for 100 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 9.5 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 4 against the Jets. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Kyle Monangai →Start/Sit Decisions
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2026 through Week 3.
| Points allowed to | Bears D | Panthers D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 17.9 | 19.3 |
| RBs | 19.7 | 30.5 |
| WRs | 26.2 | 21.8 |
| TEs | 8.3 | 14.0 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Carolina opened at 41% win probability and fell below 2% in the third quarter.
Panthers win probability
Key Swings
- −22Williams 9-yd TD run64% → 42%Q1 5:52
- +22Young 7-yd TD run20% → 43%Q2 8:42
- −25Williams 29-yd TD run44% → 19%Q2 0:22
- +28Hubbard 2-yd TD run17% → 44%Q3 9:02
- −31Swift 1-yd TD run45% → 14%Q3 3:05
Swing in Panthers win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Chicago Bears | Measure | Carolina Panthers |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Plays | 62 |
| 44% | Pass rate | 65% |
| 8.4 | Yds / dropback | 8.8 |
| 7.5 | Yds / carry | 5.7 |
| 10/14 | Third downs | 4/9 |
Efficiency edge Chicago ran 8 more plays and gained 1.8 more yards per carry.
- Top targets
- CHI Raymond 35% · Burden 19% · Kmet 12%
- CAR Coker 26% · McMillan 24% · Tremble 15%
Possession Results
| Result | CHI | CAR |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 8 | 5 |
| Field goals | 1 | 1 |
| Punts | 2 | 3 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 2 |
| Turnovers on downs | 1 | 1 |
CHI turnover edge: +1
- The Panthers opened the scoring on their first possession, a 6-play, 42-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
- The Bears scored touchdowns on two of their first three drives, then drained the clock with two second-half drives of five to nine minutes.
All 27 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 10 | 1:04 | Fumble |
| CAR | Q1 13:56 | 6 | 42 | 2:23 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q1 11:33 | 9 | 73 | 5:41 | Touchdown |
| CAR | Q1 5:52 | 3 | -3 | 1:40 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 4:12 | 6 | 67 | 2:13 | Touchdown |
| CAR | Q1 1:59 | 3 | 6 | 2:11 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 14:48 | 2 | 41 | 0:51 | Touchdown |
| CAR | Q2 13:57 | 3 | 73 | 1:17 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 12:40 | 4 | 9 | 2:13 | Downs |
| CAR | Q2 10:27 | 3 | 21 | 1:45 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 8:42 | 3 | 5 | 1:46 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 6:56 | 4 | 6 | 1:36 | Field goal |
| CAR | Q2 5:20 | 7 | 48 | 2:45 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q2 2:35 | 6 | 80 | 2:13 | Touchdown |
| CAR | Q2 0:22 | 2 | 11 | 0:17 | Interception |
| CHI | Q2 0:05 | 1 | 0 | 0:05 | End of half |
| CAR | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 5 | 2:01 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 12:59 | 3 | 1 | 1:31 | Punt |
| CAR | Q3 11:28 | 7 | 58 | 2:26 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q3 9:02 | 13 | 65 | 5:57 | Touchdown |
| CAR | Q3 3:05 | 6 | 21 | 2:15 | Downs |
| CHI | Q3 0:50 | 1 | 61 | 0:10 | Touchdown |
| CAR | Q3 0:40 | 3 | 32 | 0:50 | Fumble |
| CHI | Q4 14:50 | 12 | 61 | 8:23 | Touchdown |
| CAR | Q4 6:27 | 10 | 76 | 2:27 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q4 4:00 | 4 | 49 | 0:20 | Touchdown |
| CAR | Q4 3:40 | 7 | 52 | 3:40 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Bears vs Panthers Head-to-Head
The Bears and Panthers first met in 1995 and have played 14 times since.
- All-time series
- 10–4Bears lead, 14 meetings since 1995
- Postseason
- 1–0Panthers won in 2005
- Largest Bears win
- 36–102024
- Largest Panthers win
- 24–142002
Since 2021
3–0 Bears lead
3 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- B
- B
- B
Oldest to newest. B = Bears win, P = Panthers win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2026 Wk 1 Bears at Panthers, 2026 Wk 1 recap CHI 59 CAR 37 CHI W
- 2024 Wk 5 Panthers at Bears, 2024 Wk 5 recap CHI 36 CAR 10 CHI W
- 2023 Wk 10 Panthers at Bears, 2023 Wk 10 recap CHI 16 CAR 13 CHI W
Season to Date (Through Week 3)
The 2026 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Bears | Stat | Panthers |
|---|---|---|
| 2-1 | Record | 1-2 |
| 29.7 | Points per game | 29.7 |
| 408.0 | Yards per game | 392.7 |
| 5.9 | Yards per play | 6.0 |
| 17.7 | Points allowed per game | 27.7 |
| 324.0 | Yards allowed per game | 365.7 |
Bears vs Panthers Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- CHI −3Bears covered by 19
- Total
- 47.5Over: 96 points scored (by 48.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bears | 25.3 | 59 | +33.8 |
| Panthers | 22.3 | 37 | +14.8 |
Both offenses beat the market's expectation, and the Fantasy tab shows who cashed in.
Betting Trends
Each team's 2026 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Chicago Bears
- Against the spread
- 1–0
- Over/under
- 1–0
- ATS as favorite
- 1–0
- ATS on the road
- 1–0
Carolina Panthers
- Against the spread
- 0–1
- Over/under
- 1–0
- ATS as underdog
- 0–1
- ATS at home
- 0–1
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Bears and Panthers in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Bear or a Panther, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Bears or Panthers player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Bears and Panthers players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Bears and Panthers defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2026 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Bears vs Panthers Game FAQ
Who won the 2026 Bears vs Panthers Week 1 game?
The Chicago Bears beat the Carolina Panthers 59–37 in Week 1 of the 2026 season. The game was played at Bank of America Stadium in Charlotte, NC, on September 13, 2026. See the Bears' 2026 schedule.
What was the final score of Bears vs Panthers?
The final score was Bears 59, Panthers 37. The Bears led 31–24 at halftime, and the second half went Bears 28, Panthers 13.
What happened in the Bears vs Panthers game?
Chicago led 31–24 at halftime after a 17-point second quarter and outscored Carolina 28–13 after the break to win 59–37. The Bears finished with a 552–478 edge in total offense and averaged 7.9 yards per play. Caleb Williams led all players with 21 of 29 passing for 269 yards and 2 touchdowns, plus 10 carries for 65 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. The Panthers committed 3 turnovers, the Bears 1.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Bears vs Panthers?
Caleb Williams led the game with 37.3 PPR fantasy points, the QB1 of Week 1, on 21 of 29 passing for 269 yards and 2 touchdowns, plus 10 carries for 65 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. Jalen Coker was next with 33.8 (WR1). See Caleb Williams's 2026 game log.
Who led Bears vs Panthers in passing, rushing and receiving?
Bryce Young (CAR) led all passers with 23 of 37 for 361 yards, 3 touchdowns and an interception. D'Andre Swift (CHI) led in rushing with 18 carries for 124 yards and 3 touchdowns. Jalen Coker (CAR) led in receiving with 8 catches for 138 yards and 2 touchdowns.
How many fantasy points did Caleb Williams score against the Panthers?
Caleb Williams scored 37.3 fantasy points against the Panthers in Week 1 of the 2026 season, the same in PPR, half-PPR and standard scoring because he had no catches, on 21 of 29 passing for 269 yards and 2 touchdowns, plus 10 carries for 65 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Bears vs Panthers?
D'Andre Swift outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 32.4 PPR points on 12.6 xFP (+19.8). Jimmy Horn Jr. fell furthest short, with -2.0 points on 1.7 xFP (−3.7). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
How did the Bears beat the Panthers?
The Bears beat the Panthers 59–37 because they averaged 7.9 yards per play to 7.7, won the turnover battle 3–1, and outgained them 552–478.
Which team won the turnover battle in Bears vs Panthers?
The Bears won the turnover battle 3–1: the Panthers gave the ball away 3 times and the Bears 1 time. The Bears won the game.
What is the all-time Bears vs Panthers record?
The Bears lead the all-time series 10–4 across 14 meetings since 1995, including a 0–1 record in the postseason.
When did the Bears and Panthers last play before this game?
Before Week 1 of 2026, they last met in the 2024 season on October 6, 2024, when the Bears beat the Panthers 36–10.
Have the Bears and Panthers met in the playoffs?
Yes, 1 time, most recently in the 2005 playoffs. The Bears are 0–1 against the Panthers in the postseason.
What was the closing spread for Bears vs Panthers?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Bears −3, making the Chicago Bears 3-point favorites, with a closing total of 47.5. That implied about 25.3 points for the Bears and 22.3 for the Panthers.
Did Bears vs Panthers go over or under the total?
The game went over. The consensus closing total was 47.5, and the teams combined for 96 points, 48.5 over the number.
Who covered the spread in Bears vs Panthers?
The Bears covered by 19 against the closing line of Bears −3. The final margin was 22 points.
