Final2021 Week 1

SoFi Stadium, Inglewood, CA

Chicago Bears vs Los Angeles Rams, Week 1 2021

Chicago Bears

Away

14

Los Angeles Rams

HomeWon

34

Scoring by quarter
TeamQ1Q2Q3Q4Final
Bears077014
Rams10314734

CHI 14LAR 34 Final

  • Passing leader

    Matthew Stafford

    LAR · QB

    24.3PPR pts

    20/26, 321 YDS, 3 TD

  • Top fantasy scorer

    Cooper Kupp

    LAR · WR

    23.8PPR pts

    7 REC, 108 YDS, 1 TD

  • Bears leader

    David Montgomery

    CHI · RB

    18.8PPR pts

    16 ATT, 108 YDS, 1 TD, 1 REC, 10 REC YDS

  • Defensive playmaker

    David Long Jr.

    LAR

    1 INT, 5 TKL

Rams 34, Bears 14: Los Angeles leads from start to finish

Los Angeles led 13–7 at halftime and outscored Chicago 21–7 after the break to win 34–14. The Rams finished with a 386–322 edge in total offense and averaged 7.7 yards per play.

The gap showed up everywhere. The Bears went 5-for-11 on third down and committed two turnovers, while the Rams finished without a giveaway.

Key advantages

  • +3.0 yards/play LAR 7.7 · CHI 4.7
  • +2 turnover margin LAR 0 turnovers
  • +64 total yards LAR 386 · CHI 322

Game Highlights

Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube

Got a Bear or Ram on your fantasy team?

Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.

Connect your league

Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.

Why the Rams Won

Los Angeles won the efficiency, turnover, and third-down battles.

Team stats comparison, Bears vs Rams
BearsStatRams
4.7Yards per play7.7
2Turnovers0
322Total yards386
Other team stats
69Plays50
45%Third-down conversion55%
35:14Time of possession24:46

Scoring Summary

The Rams scored four touchdowns and two field goals; the Bears scored two touchdowns.

Scoring plays, Bears vs Rams
TimeTeamPlayCHILAR
1st quarter
10:36LARMatthew Stafford → Van Jefferson, 67-yard TD Takes leadMatt Gay XP07
4:39LARMatt Gay 53-yard FG Extends lead010
2nd quarter
11:39LARMatt Gay 22-yard FG Extends lead013
0:34CHIDavid Montgomery 3-yard TD runCairo Santos XP713
3rd quarter
13:52LARMatthew Stafford → Cooper Kupp, 56-yard TD Extends leadMatt Gay XP720
4:14CHIJustin Fields 3-yard TD runCairo Santos XP1420
1:19LARDarrell Henderson Jr. 1-yard TD run Extends leadMatt Gay XP1427
4th quarter
3:17LARMatthew Stafford → Robert Woods, 2-yard TD Extends leadMatt Gay XP1434

Fantasy Points: Bears vs Rams, Week 1 2021

Fantasy leaders

  1. Matthew StaffordLARQB24.3 PTSQB9
  2. Cooper KuppLARWR23.8 PTSWR10
  3. David MontgomeryCHIRB18.8 PTSRB8
  4. Van JeffersonLARWR16.0 PTSWR28

Player Stats

Quarterbacks

Quarterback statistics
PlayerFPTSFINCMP/ATTPass YDSTDINTRush ATTRush YDSRush TDRateStart/Sit
Matthew StaffordLARQB24.3QB920/26321305-50156.1Start/Sit →
Andy DaltonCHIQB5.5QB3227/3820601213072.9Start/Sit →
Justin FieldsCHIQB6.7QB302/2100013187.5Start/Sit →

WRs, RBs, & TEs

Receiver, running back and tight end statistics
PlayerFPTSFINPOSRush ATTRush YDSRush TDTGTRECRec YDSRec TDStart/Sit
Cooper KuppLARWR23.8WR10WR———1071081Start/Sit →
David MontgomeryCHIRB18.8RB8RB16108111100Start/Sit →
Van JeffersonLARWR16.0WR28WR———32801
Darrell HendersonLARRB15.7RB16RB1670111170
Robert WoodsLARWR12.4WR46WR17043271
Tyler HigbeeLARTE11.8TE9TE———65680Start/Sit →
Allen RobinsonCHIWR9.5WR62WR———116350
Cole KmetCHITE9.2TE18TE———75420Start/Sit →
Marquise GoodwinCHIWR8.3WR67WR1-2044450
Damien WilliamsCHIRB8.0RB39RB612054280
Darnell MooneyCHIWR7.6WR71WR———75260Start/Sit →
Damiere ByrdCHIWR4.9WR83WR———33190
DeSean JacksonLARWR4.1WR92WR———22210
Jimmy GrahamCHITE2.1TE45TE———21110
Sony MichelLARRB0.2RB77RB120————

Fantasy Usage

Chicago Bears

Snap Share

  1. Darnell MooneyWR69 snaps100%
  2. Allen RobinsonWR63 snaps91%
  3. Cole KmetTE51 snaps74%
  4. David MontgomeryRB41 snaps59%
  5. Damiere ByrdWR36 snaps52%

Target Share40 targets

  1. Allen Robinson28%, 11 targets
  2. Cole Kmet18%, 7 targets
  3. Darnell Mooney18%, 7 targets
  4. Damien Williams13%, 5 targets
  5. Marquise Goodwin10%, 4 targets
  6. Other15%, 6 targets

Carry Share26 carries

  1. David Montgomery62%, 16 carries
  2. Damien Williams23%, 6 carries
  3. Andy Dalton8%, 2 carries
  4. Marquise Goodwin4%, 1 carries
  5. Justin Fields4%, 1 carries

Los Angeles Rams

Snap Share

  1. Tyler HigbeeTE52 snaps100%
  2. Cooper KuppWR49 snaps94%
  3. Darrell HendersonRB49 snaps94%
  4. Robert WoodsWR40 snaps77%
  5. Van JeffersonWR36 snaps69%

Target Share26 targets

  1. Cooper Kupp38%, 10 targets
  2. Tyler Higbee23%, 6 targets
  3. Robert Woods15%, 4 targets
  4. Van Jefferson12%, 3 targets
  5. DeSean Jackson8%, 2 targets
  6. Other4%, 1 targets

Carry Share23 carries

  1. Darrell Henderson70%, 16 carries
  2. Matthew Stafford22%, 5 carries
  3. Robert Woods4%, 1 carries
  4. Sony Michel4%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
Offensive snaps and share for the skill positions
PlayerSNAPSSNAP %TGTTGT %CAR
Darnell MooneyCHIWR69100%718%0
Tyler HigbeeLARTE52100%623%0
Cooper KuppLARWR4994%1038%0
Darrell HendersonLARRB4994%14%16
Allen RobinsonCHIWR6391%1128%0
Robert WoodsLARWR4077%415%1
Cole KmetCHITE5174%718%0
Van JeffersonLARWR3669%312%0
David MontgomeryCHIRB4159%13%16
Damiere ByrdCHIWR3652%38%0
Damien WilliamsCHIRB3043%513%6
Marquise GoodwinCHIWR2638%410%1
Johnny MundtLARTE1529%00%0
DeSean JacksonLARWR1427%28%0
Jimmy GrahamCHITE1420%25%0
Jesse JamesCHITE913%00%0
J.P. HoltzCHITE57%00%0
Sony MichelLARRB36%00%1
Tutu AtwellLARWR24%00%0
Khalil HerbertCHIRB11%00%0

Fantasy Points vs Expected

Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.

  • Biggest overperformer+10.9Van Jefferson16.0 PTS vs 5.1 xFP
  • Biggest underperformer−11.5Andy Dalton6.5 PTS vs 18.0 xFP
  • Highest expected volume18.5 xFPAllen Robinson9.5 PTS scored
Usage and expected fantasy points
PlayerPTSxFPvs xFPSnap%UsageRte%Pass attCarCar%TgtTgt%
Allen RobinsonCHI · WR9.518.5−9.091%28% tgt—000%1128%
Andy DaltonCHI · QB6.518.0−11.593%38 att—3828%00%
Cooper KuppLAR · WR23.816.8+7.094%38% tgt—000%1038%
Matthew StaffordLAR · QB24.314.6+9.7100%26 att—26522%00%
Damien WilliamsCHI · RB8.012.3−4.343%23% car—0623%513%
Darrell Henderson Jr.LAR · RB15.712.0+3.794%70% car—01670%14%
David MontgomeryCHI · RB18.812.0+6.859%62% car—01662%13%
Cole KmetCHI · TE9.211.8−2.674%18% tgt—000%718%
Darnell MooneyCHI · WR7.611.8−4.2100%18% tgt—000%718%
Tyler HigbeeLAR · TE11.810.1+1.7100%23% tgt—000%623%
Marquise GoodwinCHI · WR8.37.4+0.938%10% tgt—014%410%
Robert WoodsLAR · WR12.47.4+5.077%15% tgt—014%415%
Damiere ByrdCHI · WR4.95.1−0.252%8% tgt—000%38%
Van JeffersonLAR · WR16.05.1+10.969%12% tgt—000%312%
DeSean JacksonLAR · WR4.13.4+0.727%8% tgt—000%28%
Jimmy GrahamCHI · TE2.13.4−1.320%5% tgt—000%25%
Justin FieldsCHI · QB6.71.5+5.27%2 att—214%00%
Sony MichelLAR · RB0.20.6−0.46%4% car—014%00%

Team totals: Bears 40 targets and 26 carries; Rams 26 targets and 23 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2021 season: 1.68 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.64 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.

Fantasy Verdicts

Andy Dalton Unlucky

CHI · QB · 6.5 pts on 18.0 expected

27 of 38 passing for 206 yards, 1 interception; 2 carries for 13 yards.

Verdict: The role was there, worth 18.0 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.

Start/Sit: Andy Dalton →

Matthew Stafford Ran hot

LAR · QB · 24.3 pts on 14.6 expected

20 of 26 passing for 321 yards, 3 touchdowns; 5 carries for -5 yards.

Verdict: The opportunities were worth 14.6 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.

Start/Sit: Matthew Stafford →

Allen Robinson Unlucky

CHI · WR · 9.5 pts on 18.5 expected

11 targets (28% of the team's), 6 catches for 35 yards.

Verdict: The role was there, worth 18.5 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.

Damien Williams

CHI · RB · 8.0 pts on 12.3 expected

5 targets (13% of the team's), 4 catches for 28 yards; 6 carries (23% of the team's) for 12 yards.

Verdict: The points matched the role, 12.3 expected.

Cooper Kupp Ran hot

LAR · WR · 23.8 pts on 16.8 expected

10 targets (38% of the team's), 7 catches for 108 yards and 1 touchdown.

Verdict: The opportunities were worth 16.8 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.

Start/Sit: Cooper Kupp →

Darrell Henderson Jr. Strong role

LAR · RB · 15.7 pts on 12.0 expected

1 target (4% of the team's), 1 catch for 17 yards; 16 carries (70% of the team's) for 70 yards and 1 touchdown.

Verdict: The points matched the role, 12.0 expected.

David Montgomery Ran hot

CHI · RB · 18.8 pts on 12.0 expected

1 target (3% of the team's), 1 catch for 10 yards; 16 carries (62% of the team's) for 108 yards and 1 touchdown.

Verdict: The opportunities were worth 12.0 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.

Start/Sit: David Montgomery →

Robert Woods Ran hot

LAR · WR · 12.4 pts on 7.4 expected

4 targets (15% of the team's), 3 catches for 27 yards and 1 touchdown; 1 carry (4% of the team's) for 7 yards.

Verdict: The opportunities were worth 7.4 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.

Fantasy Matchups

Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2021 through Week 18.

Fantasy points allowed per game by position, Bears defense and Rams defense
Points allowed toBears DRams D
QBs17.716.0
RBs21.520.9
WRs34.436.5
TEs8.711.9

Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.

How the Game Swung

Los Angeles opened at 75% win probability and passed 98% in the third quarter on the way to the win.

Rams win probability

Rams win probability by game minuteRams started at 75%, stood at 86% at halftime and finished at 100%, across 8 scoring plays.Q1Q2Q3Q4100%50%0%

Key Swings

  1. +14Stafford → Jefferson, 67-yd TD74% → 88%Q1 10:36
  2. −10Montgomery 3-yd TD run97% → 86%Q2 0:34
  3. +10Stafford → Kupp, 56-yd TD87% → 97%Q3 13:52
  4. −10Fields 3-yd TD run98% → 88%Q3 4:14
  5. +10Henderson 1-yd TD run88% → 99%Q3 1:19

Swing in Rams win probability, in points

Play Calling and Possessions

Play calling, Bears vs Rams
Chicago BearsMeasureLos Angeles Rams
69Plays50
62%Pass rate54%
4.4Yds / dropback11.6
5.2Yds / carry3.2
5/11Third downs6/11

Efficiency edge Los Angeles ran 19 fewer plays but gained 7.2 more yards per dropback.

  • Top targets
  • CHI Robinson 28% · Kmet 18% · Mooney 18%
  • LAR Kupp 38% · Higbee 23% · Woods 15%

Possession Results

How each possession ended, Bears vs Rams
ResultCHILAR
Touchdowns24
Field goals02
Punts11
Turnovers20
Turnovers on downs30

LAR turnover edge: +2

  • The Rams opened the scoring on their first possession, a 3-play, 80-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
All 17 possessions, drive by drive
Drive chart
TeamStartPlaysYardsTimeResult
CHIQ1 15:005493:06Interception
LARQ1 11:543801:18Touchdown
CHIQ1 10:367353:19Downs
LARQ1 7:176242:38Field goal
CHIQ1 4:396333:25Fumble
LARQ1 1:1410544:35Field goal
CHIQ2 11:397284:21Punt
LARQ2 7:183-32:36Punt
CHIQ2 4:429554:08Touchdown
LARQ2 0:341-20:34End of half
LARQ3 15:004751:08Touchdown
CHIQ3 13:5216819:38Touchdown
LARQ3 4:148752:55Touchdown
CHIQ3 1:1913496:18Downs
LARQ4 10:0112706:44Touchdown
CHIQ4 3:17620:59Downs
LARQ4 2:18572:18End of game
About these numbers

Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.

Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.

Bears vs Rams Head-to-Head

The Bears and Rams first met in 1937 and have played 98 times since.

All-time series
55–40–3Bears lead, 98 meetings since 1937
Postseason
2–1Rams won in 1950 and 2025; Bears won in 1985
Largest Bears win
47–01942
Largest Rams win
38–101975

Since 2021

2–1 Rams lead

3 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.

Oldest to newest. R = Rams win, B = Bears win, outlined = this game.

Recent Meetings

Season to Date (Through Week 18)

The 2021 regular season, from each game's box score.

Season to date, Bears vs Rams
BearsStatRams
6-11Record12-5
18.3Points per game27.1
307.4Yards per game372.1
4.9Yards per play6.0
23.9Points allowed per game21.9
316.7Yards allowed per game344.9

Bears vs Rams Odds and Results

How this game finished against the betting lines.

Spread
LAR −9Rams covered by 11
Total
46.5Over: 48 points scored (by 1.5)

Expected vs Actual Scoring

Implied team totals against the actual score
TeamImpliedActualDifference
Rams27.834+6.3
Bears18.814−4.8

The Rams beat their implied total and the Bears fell short of theirs; the Fantasy tab has the player lines behind it.

Betting Trends

Each team's 2021 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.

Chicago Bears

Against the spread
0–1
Over/under
1–0
ATS as underdog
0–1
ATS on the road
0–1

Los Angeles Rams

Against the spread
1–0
Over/under
1–0
ATS as favorite
1–0
ATS at home
1–0

Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.

21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.

Bears and Rams in Fantasy

The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Bear or a Ram, these answer the week-to-week question.

Keep Exploring

2021 Game Logs for Players in This Game

Bears vs Rams Game FAQ

Who won the 2021 Bears vs Rams Week 1 game?

The Los Angeles Rams beat the Chicago Bears 34–14 in Week 1 of the 2021 season. The game was played at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, CA, on September 12, 2021. See the Rams' 2021 schedule.

What was the final score of Bears vs Rams?

The final score was Rams 34, Bears 14. The Rams led 13–7 at halftime, and the second half went Bears 7, Rams 21.

What happened in the Bears vs Rams game?

Los Angeles led 13–7 at halftime and outscored Chicago 21–7 after the break to win 34–14. The Rams finished with a 386–322 edge in total offense and averaged 7.7 yards per play. Matthew Stafford led all players with 20 of 26 passing for 321 yards and 3 touchdowns, plus 5 carries for -5 rushing yards. The Bears committed 2 turnovers, the Rams none.

Who scored the most fantasy points in Bears vs Rams?

Matthew Stafford led the game with 24.3 PPR fantasy points, the QB9 of Week 1, on 20 of 26 passing for 321 yards and 3 touchdowns, plus 5 carries for -5 rushing yards. Cooper Kupp was next with 23.8 (WR10). See Matthew Stafford's 2021 game log.

Who led Bears vs Rams in passing, rushing and receiving?

Matthew Stafford (LAR) led all passers with 20 of 26 for 321 yards and 3 touchdowns. David Montgomery (CHI) led in rushing with 16 carries for 108 yards and a touchdown. Cooper Kupp (LAR) led in receiving with 7 catches for 108 yards and a touchdown.

How many fantasy points did Matthew Stafford score against the Bears?

Matthew Stafford scored 24.3 fantasy points against the Bears in Week 1 of the 2021 season, the same in PPR, half-PPR and standard scoring because he had no catches, on 20 of 26 passing for 321 yards and 3 touchdowns, plus 5 carries for -5 rushing yards.

Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Bears vs Rams?

Van Jefferson outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 16.0 PPR points on 5.1 xFP (+10.9). Andy Dalton fell furthest short, with 6.5 points on 18.0 xFP (−11.5). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.

How did the Rams beat the Bears?

The Rams beat the Bears 34–14 because they averaged 7.7 yards per play to 4.7, won the turnover battle 2–0, and outgained them 386–322.

Which team won the turnover battle in Bears vs Rams?

The Rams won the turnover battle 2–0: the Bears gave the ball away 2 times and the Rams not at all. The Rams won the game.

What is the all-time Bears vs Rams record?

The Bears lead the all-time series 55–40–3 across 98 meetings since 1937, including a 1–2 record in the postseason.

When did the Bears and Rams last play before this game?

Before Week 1 of 2021, they last met in the 2020 season on October 26, 2020, when the Rams beat the Bears 24–10.

Have the Bears and Rams met in the playoffs?

Yes, 3 times, most recently in the 2025 playoffs. The Bears are 1–2 against the Rams in the postseason.

What was the closing spread for Bears vs Rams?

The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Rams −9, making the Los Angeles Rams 9-point favorites, with a closing total of 46.5. That implied about 27.8 points for the Rams and 18.8 for the Bears.

Did Bears vs Rams go over or under the total?

The game went over. The consensus closing total was 46.5, and the teams combined for 48 points, 1.5 over the number.

Who covered the spread in Bears vs Rams?

The Rams covered by 11 against the closing line of Rams −9. The final margin was 20 points.