Final2021 Week 1
SoFi Stadium, Inglewood, CA|
Chicago Bears vs Los Angeles Rams, Week 1 2021
Chicago Bears
Away
14
Los Angeles Rams
HomeWon
34
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bears | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 14 |
| Rams | 10 | 3 | 14 | 7 | 34 |
CHI 14 · LAR 34 Final
Passing leader
LAR · QB
24.3PPR pts
20/26, 321 YDS, 3 TD
Top fantasy scorer
LAR · WR
23.8PPR pts
7 REC, 108 YDS, 1 TD
Bears leader
CHI · RB
18.8PPR pts
16 ATT, 108 YDS, 1 TD, 1 REC, 10 REC YDS
Defensive playmaker
David Long Jr.
LAR
1 INT, 5 TKL
Rams 34, Bears 14: Los Angeles leads from start to finish
Los Angeles led 13–7 at halftime and outscored Chicago 21–7 after the break to win 34–14. The Rams finished with a 386–322 edge in total offense and averaged 7.7 yards per play.
The gap showed up everywhere. The Bears went 5-for-11 on third down and committed two turnovers, while the Rams finished without a giveaway.
Key advantages
- +3.0 yards/play LAR 7.7 · CHI 4.7
- +2 turnover margin LAR 0 turnovers
- +64 total yards LAR 386 · CHI 322
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Bear or Ram on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Rams Won
Los Angeles won the efficiency, turnover, and third-down battles.
| Bears | Stat | Rams |
|---|---|---|
| 4.7 | Yards per play | 7.7 |
| 2 | Turnovers | 0 |
| 322 | Total yards | 386 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 69 | Plays | 50 |
| 45% | Third-down conversion | 55% |
| 35:14 | Time of possession | 24:46 |
Scoring Summary
The Rams scored four touchdowns and two field goals; the Bears scored two touchdowns.
| Time | Team | Play | CHI | LAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 10:36 | LAR | Matthew Stafford → Van Jefferson, 67-yard TD Takes leadMatt Gay XP | 0 | 7 |
| 4:39 | LAR | Matt Gay 53-yard FG Extends lead | 0 | 10 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 11:39 | LAR | Matt Gay 22-yard FG Extends lead | 0 | 13 |
| 0:34 | CHI | David Montgomery 3-yard TD runCairo Santos XP | 7 | 13 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 13:52 | LAR | Matthew Stafford → Cooper Kupp, 56-yard TD Extends leadMatt Gay XP | 7 | 20 |
| 4:14 | CHI | Justin Fields 3-yard TD runCairo Santos XP | 14 | 20 |
| 1:19 | LAR | Darrell Henderson Jr. 1-yard TD run Extends leadMatt Gay XP | 14 | 27 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 3:17 | LAR | Matthew Stafford → Robert Woods, 2-yard TD Extends leadMatt Gay XP | 14 | 34 |
Fantasy Points: Bears vs Rams, Week 1 2021
Fantasy leaders
- Matthew StaffordLAR · QB24.3 PTSQB9
- Cooper KuppLAR · WR23.8 PTSWR10
- David MontgomeryCHI · RB18.8 PTSRB8
- Van JeffersonLAR · WR16.0 PTSWR28
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.3 | QB9 | 20/26 | 321 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 | 156.1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.5 | QB32 | 27/38 | 206 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 72.9 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.7 | QB30 | 2/2 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 87.5 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.8 | WR10 | WR | — | — | — | 10 | 7 | 108 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 18.8 | RB8 | RB | 16 | 108 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 16.0 | WR28 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 80 | 1 | ||
| 15.7 | RB16 | RB | 16 | 70 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 0 | ||
| 12.4 | WR46 | WR | 1 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 27 | 1 | ||
| 11.8 | TE9 | TE | — | — | — | 6 | 5 | 68 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.5 | WR62 | WR | — | — | — | 11 | 6 | 35 | 0 | ||
| 9.2 | TE18 | TE | — | — | — | 7 | 5 | 42 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.3 | WR67 | WR | 1 | -2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 45 | 0 | ||
| 8.0 | RB39 | RB | 6 | 12 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 28 | 0 | ||
| 7.6 | WR71 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 5 | 26 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.9 | WR83 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 19 | 0 | ||
| 4.1 | WR92 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 21 | 0 | ||
| 2.1 | TE45 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 11 | 0 | ||
| 0.2 | RB77 | RB | 1 | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | — |
Fantasy Usage
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Darnell MooneyWR69 snaps100%
Allen RobinsonWR63 snaps91%
Cole KmetTE51 snaps74%
David MontgomeryRB41 snaps59%
Damiere ByrdWR36 snaps52%
Target Share40 targets
- Allen Robinson28%, 11 targets
- Cole Kmet18%, 7 targets
- Darnell Mooney18%, 7 targets
- Damien Williams13%, 5 targets
- Marquise Goodwin10%, 4 targets
- Other15%, 6 targets
Carry Share26 carries
- David Montgomery62%, 16 carries
- Damien Williams23%, 6 carries
- Andy Dalton8%, 2 carries
- Marquise Goodwin4%, 1 carries
- Justin Fields4%, 1 carries
Los Angeles Rams
Snap Share
Tyler HigbeeTE52 snaps100%
Cooper KuppWR49 snaps94%
Darrell HendersonRB49 snaps94%
Robert WoodsWR40 snaps77%
Van JeffersonWR36 snaps69%
Target Share26 targets
- Cooper Kupp38%, 10 targets
- Tyler Higbee23%, 6 targets
- Robert Woods15%, 4 targets
- Van Jefferson12%, 3 targets
- DeSean Jackson8%, 2 targets
- Other4%, 1 targets
Carry Share23 carries
- Darrell Henderson70%, 16 carries
- Matthew Stafford22%, 5 carries
- Robert Woods4%, 1 carries
- Sony Michel4%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 69 | 100% | 7 | 18% | 0 | |
| 52 | 100% | 6 | 23% | 0 | |
| 49 | 94% | 10 | 38% | 0 | |
| 49 | 94% | 1 | 4% | 16 | |
| 63 | 91% | 11 | 28% | 0 | |
| 40 | 77% | 4 | 15% | 1 | |
| 51 | 74% | 7 | 18% | 0 | |
| 36 | 69% | 3 | 12% | 0 | |
| 41 | 59% | 1 | 3% | 16 | |
| 36 | 52% | 3 | 8% | 0 | |
| 30 | 43% | 5 | 13% | 6 | |
| 26 | 38% | 4 | 10% | 1 | |
| 15 | 29% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 14 | 27% | 2 | 8% | 0 | |
| 14 | 20% | 2 | 5% | 0 | |
| 9 | 13% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 5 | 7% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 3 | 6% | 0 | 0% | 1 | |
| 2 | 4% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 1% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+10.9Van Jefferson16.0 PTS vs 5.1 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−11.5Andy Dalton6.5 PTS vs 18.0 xFP
- Highest expected volume18.5 xFPAllen Robinson9.5 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allen RobinsonCHI · WR | 9.5 | 18.5 | −9.0 | 91% | 28% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 11 | 28% |
| Andy DaltonCHI · QB | 6.5 | 18.0 | −11.5 | 93% | 38 att | — | 38 | 2 | 8% | 0 | 0% |
| Cooper KuppLAR · WR | 23.8 | 16.8 | +7.0 | 94% | 38% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 10 | 38% |
| Matthew StaffordLAR · QB | 24.3 | 14.6 | +9.7 | 100% | 26 att | — | 26 | 5 | 22% | 0 | 0% |
| Damien WilliamsCHI · RB | 8.0 | 12.3 | −4.3 | 43% | 23% car | — | 0 | 6 | 23% | 5 | 13% |
| Darrell Henderson Jr.LAR · RB | 15.7 | 12.0 | +3.7 | 94% | 70% car | — | 0 | 16 | 70% | 1 | 4% |
| David MontgomeryCHI · RB | 18.8 | 12.0 | +6.8 | 59% | 62% car | — | 0 | 16 | 62% | 1 | 3% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 9.2 | 11.8 | −2.6 | 74% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 18% |
| Darnell MooneyCHI · WR | 7.6 | 11.8 | −4.2 | 100% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 18% |
| Tyler HigbeeLAR · TE | 11.8 | 10.1 | +1.7 | 100% | 23% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 23% |
| Marquise GoodwinCHI · WR | 8.3 | 7.4 | +0.9 | 38% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 4 | 10% |
| Robert WoodsLAR · WR | 12.4 | 7.4 | +5.0 | 77% | 15% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 4 | 15% |
| Damiere ByrdCHI · WR | 4.9 | 5.1 | −0.2 | 52% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 8% |
| Van JeffersonLAR · WR | 16.0 | 5.1 | +10.9 | 69% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 12% |
| DeSean JacksonLAR · WR | 4.1 | 3.4 | +0.7 | 27% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 8% |
| Jimmy GrahamCHI · TE | 2.1 | 3.4 | −1.3 | 20% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 5% |
| Justin FieldsCHI · QB | 6.7 | 1.5 | +5.2 | 7% | 2 att | — | 2 | 1 | 4% | 0 | 0% |
| Sony MichelLAR · RB | 0.2 | 0.6 | −0.4 | 6% | 4% car | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Bears 40 targets and 26 carries; Rams 26 targets and 23 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2021 season: 1.68 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.64 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Andy Dalton Unlucky
CHI · QB · 6.5 pts on 18.0 expected
27 of 38 passing for 206 yards, 1 interception; 2 carries for 13 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 18.0 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Start/Sit: Andy Dalton →Matthew Stafford Ran hot
LAR · QB · 24.3 pts on 14.6 expected
20 of 26 passing for 321 yards, 3 touchdowns; 5 carries for -5 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 14.6 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Start/Sit: Matthew Stafford →Allen Robinson Unlucky
CHI · WR · 9.5 pts on 18.5 expected
11 targets (28% of the team's), 6 catches for 35 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 18.5 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Damien Williams
CHI · RB · 8.0 pts on 12.3 expected
5 targets (13% of the team's), 4 catches for 28 yards; 6 carries (23% of the team's) for 12 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 12.3 expected.
Cooper Kupp Ran hot
LAR · WR · 23.8 pts on 16.8 expected
10 targets (38% of the team's), 7 catches for 108 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 16.8 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Start/Sit: Cooper Kupp →Darrell Henderson Jr. Strong role
LAR · RB · 15.7 pts on 12.0 expected
1 target (4% of the team's), 1 catch for 17 yards; 16 carries (70% of the team's) for 70 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 12.0 expected.
David Montgomery Ran hot
CHI · RB · 18.8 pts on 12.0 expected
1 target (3% of the team's), 1 catch for 10 yards; 16 carries (62% of the team's) for 108 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 12.0 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Start/Sit: David Montgomery →Robert Woods Ran hot
LAR · WR · 12.4 pts on 7.4 expected
4 targets (15% of the team's), 3 catches for 27 yards and 1 touchdown; 1 carry (4% of the team's) for 7 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 7.4 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2021 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Bears D | Rams D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 17.7 | 16.0 |
| RBs | 21.5 | 20.9 |
| WRs | 34.4 | 36.5 |
| TEs | 8.7 | 11.9 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Los Angeles opened at 75% win probability and passed 98% in the third quarter on the way to the win.
Rams win probability
Key Swings
- +14Stafford → Jefferson, 67-yd TD74% → 88%Q1 10:36
- −10Montgomery 3-yd TD run97% → 86%Q2 0:34
- +10Stafford → Kupp, 56-yd TD87% → 97%Q3 13:52
- −10Fields 3-yd TD run98% → 88%Q3 4:14
- +10Henderson 1-yd TD run88% → 99%Q3 1:19
Swing in Rams win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Chicago Bears | Measure | Los Angeles Rams |
|---|---|---|
| 69 | Plays | 50 |
| 62% | Pass rate | 54% |
| 4.4 | Yds / dropback | 11.6 |
| 5.2 | Yds / carry | 3.2 |
| 5/11 | Third downs | 6/11 |
Efficiency edge Los Angeles ran 19 fewer plays but gained 7.2 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- CHI Robinson 28% · Kmet 18% · Mooney 18%
- LAR Kupp 38% · Higbee 23% · Woods 15%
Possession Results
| Result | CHI | LAR |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 2 | 4 |
| Field goals | 0 | 2 |
| Punts | 1 | 1 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 0 |
| Turnovers on downs | 3 | 0 |
LAR turnover edge: +2
- The Rams opened the scoring on their first possession, a 3-play, 80-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
All 17 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 5 | 49 | 3:06 | Interception |
| LAR | Q1 11:54 | 3 | 80 | 1:18 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q1 10:36 | 7 | 35 | 3:19 | Downs |
| LAR | Q1 7:17 | 6 | 24 | 2:38 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q1 4:39 | 6 | 33 | 3:25 | Fumble |
| LAR | Q1 1:14 | 10 | 54 | 4:35 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q2 11:39 | 7 | 28 | 4:21 | Punt |
| LAR | Q2 7:18 | 3 | -3 | 2:36 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 4:42 | 9 | 55 | 4:08 | Touchdown |
| LAR | Q2 0:34 | 1 | -2 | 0:34 | End of half |
| LAR | Q3 15:00 | 4 | 75 | 1:08 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q3 13:52 | 16 | 81 | 9:38 | Touchdown |
| LAR | Q3 4:14 | 8 | 75 | 2:55 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q3 1:19 | 13 | 49 | 6:18 | Downs |
| LAR | Q4 10:01 | 12 | 70 | 6:44 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q4 3:17 | 6 | 2 | 0:59 | Downs |
| LAR | Q4 2:18 | 5 | 7 | 2:18 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Bears vs Rams Head-to-Head
The Bears and Rams first met in 1937 and have played 98 times since.
- All-time series
- 55–40–3Bears lead, 98 meetings since 1937
- Postseason
- 2–1Rams won in 1950 and 2025; Bears won in 1985
- Largest Bears win
- 47–01942
- Largest Rams win
- 38–101975
Since 2021
2–1 Rams lead
3 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- R
- B
- R
Oldest to newest. R = Rams win, B = Bears win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Divisional Round Rams at Bears, 2025 Divisional Round recap LAR 20 CHI 17 LAR W
- 2024 Wk 4 Rams at Bears, 2024 Wk 4 recap CHI 24 LAR 18 CHI W
- 2021 Wk 1 Bears at Rams LAR 34 CHI 14 LAR W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2021 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Bears | Stat | Rams |
|---|---|---|
| 6-11 | Record | 12-5 |
| 18.3 | Points per game | 27.1 |
| 307.4 | Yards per game | 372.1 |
| 4.9 | Yards per play | 6.0 |
| 23.9 | Points allowed per game | 21.9 |
| 316.7 | Yards allowed per game | 344.9 |
Bears vs Rams Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- LAR −9Rams covered by 11
- Total
- 46.5Over: 48 points scored (by 1.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rams | 27.8 | 34 | +6.3 |
| Bears | 18.8 | 14 | −4.8 |
The Rams beat their implied total and the Bears fell short of theirs; the Fantasy tab has the player lines behind it.
Betting Trends
Each team's 2021 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Chicago Bears
- Against the spread
- 0–1
- Over/under
- 1–0
- ATS as underdog
- 0–1
- ATS on the road
- 0–1
Los Angeles Rams
- Against the spread
- 1–0
- Over/under
- 1–0
- ATS as favorite
- 1–0
- ATS at home
- 1–0
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Bears and Rams in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Bear or a Ram, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Bears or Rams player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Bears and Rams players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Bears and Rams defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2021 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Bears vs Rams Game FAQ
Who won the 2021 Bears vs Rams Week 1 game?
The Los Angeles Rams beat the Chicago Bears 34–14 in Week 1 of the 2021 season. The game was played at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, CA, on September 12, 2021. See the Rams' 2021 schedule.
What was the final score of Bears vs Rams?
The final score was Rams 34, Bears 14. The Rams led 13–7 at halftime, and the second half went Bears 7, Rams 21.
What happened in the Bears vs Rams game?
Los Angeles led 13–7 at halftime and outscored Chicago 21–7 after the break to win 34–14. The Rams finished with a 386–322 edge in total offense and averaged 7.7 yards per play. Matthew Stafford led all players with 20 of 26 passing for 321 yards and 3 touchdowns, plus 5 carries for -5 rushing yards. The Bears committed 2 turnovers, the Rams none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Bears vs Rams?
Matthew Stafford led the game with 24.3 PPR fantasy points, the QB9 of Week 1, on 20 of 26 passing for 321 yards and 3 touchdowns, plus 5 carries for -5 rushing yards. Cooper Kupp was next with 23.8 (WR10). See Matthew Stafford's 2021 game log.
Who led Bears vs Rams in passing, rushing and receiving?
Matthew Stafford (LAR) led all passers with 20 of 26 for 321 yards and 3 touchdowns. David Montgomery (CHI) led in rushing with 16 carries for 108 yards and a touchdown. Cooper Kupp (LAR) led in receiving with 7 catches for 108 yards and a touchdown.
How many fantasy points did Matthew Stafford score against the Bears?
Matthew Stafford scored 24.3 fantasy points against the Bears in Week 1 of the 2021 season, the same in PPR, half-PPR and standard scoring because he had no catches, on 20 of 26 passing for 321 yards and 3 touchdowns, plus 5 carries for -5 rushing yards.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Bears vs Rams?
Van Jefferson outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 16.0 PPR points on 5.1 xFP (+10.9). Andy Dalton fell furthest short, with 6.5 points on 18.0 xFP (−11.5). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
How did the Rams beat the Bears?
The Rams beat the Bears 34–14 because they averaged 7.7 yards per play to 4.7, won the turnover battle 2–0, and outgained them 386–322.
Which team won the turnover battle in Bears vs Rams?
The Rams won the turnover battle 2–0: the Bears gave the ball away 2 times and the Rams not at all. The Rams won the game.
What is the all-time Bears vs Rams record?
The Bears lead the all-time series 55–40–3 across 98 meetings since 1937, including a 1–2 record in the postseason.
When did the Bears and Rams last play before this game?
Before Week 1 of 2021, they last met in the 2020 season on October 26, 2020, when the Rams beat the Bears 24–10.
Have the Bears and Rams met in the playoffs?
Yes, 3 times, most recently in the 2025 playoffs. The Bears are 1–2 against the Rams in the postseason.
What was the closing spread for Bears vs Rams?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Rams −9, making the Los Angeles Rams 9-point favorites, with a closing total of 46.5. That implied about 27.8 points for the Rams and 18.8 for the Bears.
Did Bears vs Rams go over or under the total?
The game went over. The consensus closing total was 46.5, and the teams combined for 48 points, 1.5 over the number.
Who covered the spread in Bears vs Rams?
The Rams covered by 11 against the closing line of Rams −9. The final margin was 20 points.
