Final2021 Week 2
Soldier Field, Chicago, IL|
Cincinnati Bengals vs Chicago Bears, Week 2 2021
Cincinnati Bengals
Away
17
Chicago Bears
HomeWon
20
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bengals | 0 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 17 |
| Bears | 7 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 20 |
CIN 17 · CHI 20 Final
Passing leader
CIN · QB
13.3PPR pts
19/30, 207 YDS, 2 TD, 3 INT
Top fantasy scorer
CIN · WR
16.0PPR pts
6 REC, 60 YDS, 1 TD
Bengals leader
Tyler Boyd
CIN · WR
14.3PPR pts
7 REC, 73 YDS
Defensive playmaker
Roquan Smith
CHI
1 INT, 1 TD, 1 SACK, 9 TKL
Bears 20, Bengals 17: Chicago holds off Cincinnati
Chicago led 7–0 at halftime and won 20–17, though Cincinnati took the second half 17–13. Cincinnati outgained the Bears 248–206.
Cincinnati didn't get on the board until the third quarter.
The Bengals went 6-for-13 on third down and committed four turnovers.
Key advantages
- +3 turnover margin CHI 1 · CIN 4 turnovers
- +2:42 time of possession CHI 31:21 · CIN 28:39
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Bengal or Bear on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Bears Won
Chicago won the turnover and time of possession battles.
| Bengals | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Turnovers | 1 |
| 28:39 | Time of possession | 31:21 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 248 | Total yards | 206 |
| 4.5 | Yards per play | 3.4 |
| 55 | Plays | 61 |
| 46% | Third-down conversion | 40% |
Scoring Summary
The Bears scored two touchdowns and two field goals; the Bengals scored two touchdowns and one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | CIN | CHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 9:58 | CHI | Andy Dalton → Allen Robinson II, 11-yard TD Takes leadCairo Santos XP | 0 | 7 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| No scoring | ||||
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 8:22 | CIN | Evan McPherson 53-yard FG | 3 | 7 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 14:52 | CHI | Cairo Santos 28-yard FG Extends lead | 3 | 10 |
| 10:55 | CHI | Roquan Smith 53-yard interception return TD Extends leadCairo Santos XP | 3 | 17 |
| 6:40 | CHI | Cairo Santos 22-yard FG Extends lead | 3 | 20 |
| 4:39 | CIN | Joe Burrow → Ja'Marr Chase, 42-yard TDEvan McPherson XP | 10 | 20 |
| 3:39 | CIN | Joe Burrow → Tee Higgins, 7-yard TDEvan McPherson XP | 17 | 20 |
Fantasy Points: Bengals vs Bears, Week 2 2021
Fantasy leaders
- Tee HigginsCIN · WR15.0 PTSWR29
- Tyler BoydCIN · WR14.3 PTSWR34
- Ja'Marr ChaseCIN · WR13.4 PTSWR41
- Joe BurrowCIN · QB13.3 PTSQB25
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13.3 | QB25 | 19/30 | 207 | 2 | 3 | — | — | — | 66.3 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.5 | QB34 | 6/13 | 60 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 31 | 0 | 27.7 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.7 | QB28 | 9/11 | 56 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 25 | 0 | 118.2 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15.0 | WR29 | WR | — | — | — | 10 | 6 | 60 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 14.3 | WR34 | WR | — | — | — | 9 | 7 | 73 | 0 | ||
| 13.4 | WR41 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 54 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 12.6 | WR43 | WR | — | — | — | 8 | 6 | 66 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 10.9 | RB22 | RB | 20 | 61 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 18 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 10.4 | WR49 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 24 | 1 | ||
| 8.1 | RB36 | RB | 20 | 69 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | ||
| 2.4 | RB61 | RB | 2 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 2 | -2 | 0 | ||
| 2.4 | RB64 | RB | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | ||
| 2.4 | TE43 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | ||
| 2.0 | WR98 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 10 | 0 | ||
| 1.0 | TE59 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | RB | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Cincinnati Bengals
Snap Share
Ja'Marr ChaseWR51 snaps93%
Tee HigginsWR50 snaps91%
Tyler BoydWR48 snaps87%
Joe MixonRB46 snaps84%
C.J. UzomahTE40 snaps73%
Target Share29 targets
- Tee Higgins34%, 10 targets
- Tyler Boyd31%, 9 targets
- Ja'Marr Chase14%, 4 targets
- C.J. Uzomah7%, 2 targets
- Joe Mixon7%, 2 targets
- Other7%, 2 targets
Carry Share20 carries
- Joe Mixon100%, 20 carries
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Darnell MooneyWR58 snaps89%
Allen RobinsonWR52 snaps80%
David MontgomeryRB52 snaps80%
Cole KmetTE47 snaps72%
Marquise GoodwinWR31 snaps48%
Target Share23 targets
- Darnell Mooney35%, 8 targets
- Allen Robinson17%, 4 targets
- David Montgomery17%, 4 targets
- Marquise Goodwin13%, 3 targets
- Damien Williams13%, 3 targets
- Other4%, 1 targets
Carry Share34 carries
- David Montgomery59%, 20 carries
- Justin Fields29%, 10 carries
- Andy Dalton6%, 2 carries
- Damien Williams6%, 2 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51 | 93% | 4 | 14% | 0 | |
| 50 | 91% | 10 | 34% | 0 | |
| 58 | 89% | 8 | 35% | 0 | |
| 48 | 87% | 9 | 31% | 0 | |
| 46 | 84% | 2 | 7% | 20 | |
| 52 | 80% | 4 | 17% | 0 | |
| 52 | 80% | 4 | 17% | 20 | |
| 40 | 73% | 2 | 7% | 0 | |
| 47 | 72% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 31 | 48% | 3 | 13% | 0 | |
| 27 | 42% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 21 | 38% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 22 | 34% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 15 | 23% | 3 | 13% | 2 | |
| 14 | 22% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 7 | 11% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 5 | 9% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 3 | 5% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 2 | 4% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+6.7Ja'Marr Chase13.4 PTS vs 6.7 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−8.7David Montgomery10.9 PTS vs 19.6 xFP
- Highest expected volume19.6 xFPDavid Montgomery10.9 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David MontgomeryCHI · RB | 10.9 | 19.6 | −8.7 | 80% | 59% car | — | 0 | 20 | 59% | 4 | 17% |
| Tee HigginsCIN · WR | 16.0 | 16.8 | −0.8 | 91% | 34% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 10 | 34% |
| Joe MixonCIN · RB | 8.1 | 16.2 | −8.1 | 84% | 100% car | — | 0 | 20 | 100% | 2 | 7% |
| Tyler BoydCIN · WR | 14.3 | 15.2 | −0.9 | 87% | 31% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 9 | 31% |
| Darnell MooneyCHI · WR | 12.6 | 13.5 | −0.9 | 89% | 35% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 35% |
| Joe BurrowCIN · QB | 13.3 | 13.2 | +0.1 | 100% | 30 att | — | 30 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Justin FieldsCHI · QB | 4.5 | 12.1 | −7.6 | 65% | 13 att | — | 13 | 10 | 29% | 0 | 0% |
| Allen RobinsonCHI · WR | 10.4 | 6.7 | +3.7 | 80% | 17% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 17% |
| Ja'Marr ChaseCIN · WR | 13.4 | 6.7 | +6.7 | 93% | 14% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 14% |
| Damien WilliamsCHI · RB | 2.4 | 6.3 | −3.9 | 23% | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 2 | 6% | 3 | 13% |
| Andy DaltonCHI · QB | 8.7 | 6.1 | +2.6 | 35% | 11 att | — | 11 | 2 | 6% | 0 | 0% |
| Marquise GoodwinCHI · WR | 2.0 | 5.1 | −3.1 | 48% | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 13% |
| C.J. UzomahCIN · TE | 2.4 | 3.4 | −1.0 | 73% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Chris EvansCIN · RB | 2.4 | 1.7 | +0.7 | 4% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 1.0 | 1.7 | −0.7 | 72% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Samaje PerineCIN · RB | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 5% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
Team totals: Bengals 29 targets and 20 carries; Bears 23 targets and 34 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2021 season: 1.68 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.64 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Joe Burrow
CIN · QB · 13.3 pts on 13.2 expected
19 of 30 passing for 207 yards, 2 touchdowns, 3 interceptions.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 13.2 expected.
Start/Sit: Joe Burrow →Justin Fields Unlucky
CHI · QB · 4.5 pts on 12.1 expected
6 of 13 passing for 60 yards, 1 interception; 10 carries for 31 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 12.1 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Start/Sit: Justin Fields →Tee Higgins Volume, no payoff
CIN · WR · 16.0 pts on 16.8 expected
10 targets (34% of the team's), 6 catches for 60 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 16.8 expected.
Trend: Season high in targets (10).
Joe Mixon Volume, no payoff
CIN · RB · 8.1 pts on 16.2 expected
2 targets (7% of the team's), 1 catch for 2 yards; 20 carries (100% of the team's) for 69 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 16.2 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
David Montgomery Unlucky
CHI · RB · 10.9 pts on 19.6 expected
4 targets (17% of the team's), 3 catches for 18 yards; 20 carries (59% of the team's) for 61 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 19.6 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Trend: Season high in carries (20).
Darnell Mooney Volume, no payoff
CHI · WR · 12.6 pts on 13.5 expected
8 targets (35% of the team's), 6 catches for 66 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 13.5 expected.
Trend: Season high in targets (8).
Ja'Marr Chase Ran hot
CIN · WR · 13.4 pts on 6.7 expected
4 targets (14% of the team's), 2 catches for 54 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 6.7 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Start/Sit: Ja'Marr Chase →Samaje Perine
CIN · RB · 0.0 pts on 1.7 expected
1 target (3% of the team's), 0 catches for 0 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 1.7 expected.
Start/Sit: Samaje Perine →Stock Up, Stock Down
Cincinnati Bengals
- ▲Stock up: Tee Higgins played 91% of the snaps, up from a 74% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Samaje Perine played 5% of the snaps, down from a 22% season average.
Chicago Bears
- ▲Stock up: David Montgomery played 80% of the snaps, up from a 59% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Damien Williams played 23% of the snaps, down from a 43% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2021 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Bengals D | Bears D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 16.0 | 17.7 |
| RBs | 24.5 | 21.5 |
| WRs | 31.7 | 34.4 |
| TEs | 14.7 | 8.7 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Chicago opened at 56% win probability and passed 98% in the fourth quarter on the way to the win.
Bears win probability
Key Swings
- +20Dalton → Robinson, 11-yd TD56% → 75%Q1 9:58
- −11McPherson 53-yd FG82% → 71%Q3 8:22
- +12Santos 28-yd FG75% → 87%Q4 14:52
- +9Smith 53-yd pick-six90% → 99%Q4 10:55
- −17Burrow → Higgins, 7-yd TD>99% → 83%Q4 3:39
Swing in Bears win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Cincinnati Bengals | Measure | Chicago Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 55 | Plays | 61 |
| 64% | Pass rate | 44% |
| 5.1 | Yds / dropback | 3.1 |
| 3.5 | Yds / carry | 3.6 |
| 6/13 | Third downs | 6/15 |
Efficiency edge Chicago ran 6 more plays than Cincinnati.
- Top targets
- CIN Higgins 34% · Boyd 31% · Chase 14%
- CHI Mooney 35% · Robinson 17% · Montgomery 17%
Possession Results
| Result | CIN | CHI |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 2 | 1 |
| Field goals | 1 | 2 |
| Punts | 2 | 4 |
| Turnovers | 4 | 1 |
| Turnovers on downs | 1 | 1 |
CHI turnover edge: +3
- The Bears opened the scoring on their first possession, a 9-play, 75-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
All 21 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 9 | 75 | 5:02 | Touchdown |
| CIN | Q1 9:58 | 12 | 48 | 6:36 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 3:22 | 12 | 61 | 5:58 | Downs |
| CIN | Q2 12:24 | 7 | 24 | 4:02 | Downs |
| CHI | Q2 8:22 | 4 | 6 | 2:48 | Punt |
| CIN | Q2 5:34 | 6 | 20 | 3:44 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 1:50 | 6 | 18 | 1:15 | Punt |
| CIN | Q2 0:35 | 2 | 3 | 0:35 | End of half |
| CIN | Q3 15:00 | 11 | 43 | 6:38 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q3 8:22 | 6 | 8 | 3:21 | Punt |
| CIN | Q3 5:01 | 1 | 14 | 0:13 | Fumble |
| CHI | Q3 4:48 | 8 | 29 | 4:56 | Field goal |
| CIN | Q4 14:52 | 6 | 35 | 3:57 | Interception |
| CIN | Q4 10:55 | 2 | 4 | 0:41 | Interception |
| CHI | Q4 10:14 | 3 | -4 | 2:00 | Punt |
| CIN | Q4 8:14 | 1 | 0 | 0:08 | Interception |
| CHI | Q4 8:06 | 4 | 5 | 1:26 | Field goal |
| CIN | Q4 6:40 | 6 | 75 | 2:01 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q4 4:39 | 3 | 3 | 0:56 | Interception |
| CIN | Q4 3:43 | 1 | 7 | 0:04 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q4 3:39 | 8 | 17 | 3:39 | End of game |
About these numbers
The Bears' interception touchdown is counted as a Bengals interception, not as a Bears possession. Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Bengals vs Bears Head-to-Head
The Bengals and Bears first met in 1972 and have played 13 times since.
- All-time series
- 7–6Bears lead, 13 meetings since 1972
- Postseason
- 0No playoff meetings
- Largest Bengals win
- 45–102009
- Largest Bears win
- 44–71986
Since 2021
2–0 Bears lead
2 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- CHI
- CHI
Oldest to newest. CHI = Bears win, CIN = Bengals win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wk 9 Bears at Bengals, 2025 Wk 9 recap CHI 47 CIN 42 CHI W
- 2021 Wk 2 Bengals at Bears CHI 20 CIN 17 CHI W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2021 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Bengals | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 10-7 | Record | 6-11 |
| 27.1 | Points per game | 18.3 |
| 361.5 | Yards per game | 307.4 |
| 5.9 | Yards per play | 4.9 |
| 22.1 | Points allowed per game | 23.9 |
| 350.8 | Yards allowed per game | 316.7 |
Bengals vs Bears Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- CHI −2Bears covered by 1
- Total
- 44.5Under: 37 points scored (by 7.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bears | 23.3 | 20 | −3.3 |
| Bengals | 21.3 | 17 | −4.3 |
Both offenses finished under the market's expectation, which matches the low fantasy output in the Fantasy tab.
Betting Trends
Each team's 2021 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Cincinnati Bengals
- Against the spread
- 1–1
- Over/under
- 1–1
- ATS as underdog
- 1–1
- ATS on the road
- 0–1
Chicago Bears
- Against the spread
- 1–1
- Over/under
- 1–1
- ATS as favorite
- 1–0
- ATS as underdog
- 0–1
- ATS at home
- 1–0
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Bengals and Bears in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Bengal or a Bear, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Bengals or Bears player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Bengals and Bears players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Bengals and Bears defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2021 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Bengals vs Bears Game FAQ
Who won the 2021 Bengals vs Bears Week 2 game?
The Chicago Bears beat the Cincinnati Bengals 20–17 in Week 2 of the 2021 season. The game was played at Soldier Field in Chicago, IL, on September 19, 2021. See the Bears' 2021 schedule.
What was the final score of Bengals vs Bears?
The final score was Bears 20, Bengals 17. The Bears led 7–0 at halftime, and the second half went Bengals 17, Bears 13.
What happened in the Bengals vs Bears game?
Chicago led 7–0 at halftime and won 20–17, though Cincinnati took the second half 17–13. Cincinnati outgained the Bears 248–206. Tee Higgins led all players with 6 catches for 60 yards and a touchdown. The Bengals committed 4 turnovers, the Bears 1.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Bengals vs Bears?
Tee Higgins led the game with 15.0 PPR fantasy points, the WR29 of Week 2, on 6 catches for 60 yards and a touchdown. Tyler Boyd was next with 14.3 (WR34). See Tee Higgins's 2021 game log.
Who led Bengals vs Bears in passing, rushing and receiving?
Joe Burrow (CIN) led all passers with 19 of 30 for 207 yards, 2 touchdowns and 3 interceptions. Joe Mixon (CIN) led in rushing with 20 carries for 69 yards. Tyler Boyd (CIN) led in receiving with 7 catches for 73 yards.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Bengals vs Bears?
Ja'Marr Chase outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 13.4 PPR points on 6.7 xFP (+6.7). David Montgomery fell furthest short, with 10.9 points on 19.6 xFP (−8.7). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Bengals vs Bears?
David Montgomery had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 19.6 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 10.9. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Bears beat the Bengals?
The Bears beat the Bengals 20–17 because they won the turnover battle 4–1.
Which team won the turnover battle in Bengals vs Bears?
The Bears won the turnover battle 4–1: the Bengals gave the ball away 4 times and the Bears 1 time. The Bears won the game.
What is the all-time Bengals vs Bears record?
The Bears lead the all-time series 7–6 across 13 meetings since 1972.
When did the Bengals and Bears last play before this game?
Before Week 2 of 2021, they last met in the 2017 season on December 10, 2017, when the Bears beat the Bengals 33–7.
What is the Bengals vs Bears record since 2021?
The Bears lead 2–0 across 2 meetings since the 2021 season, including this game.
What was the closing spread for Bengals vs Bears?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Bears −2, making the Chicago Bears 2-point favorites, with a closing total of 44.5. That implied about 23.3 points for the Bears and 21.3 for the Bengals.
Did Bengals vs Bears go over or under the total?
The game went under. The consensus closing total was 44.5, and the teams combined for 37 points, 7.5 under the number.
Who covered the spread in Bengals vs Bears?
The Bears covered by 1 against the closing line of Bears −2. The final margin was 3 points.
