Final2021 Week 16
Lumen Field, Seattle, WA|
Chicago Bears vs Seattle Seahawks, Week 16 2021
Chicago Bears
AwayWon
25
Seattle Seahawks
Home
24
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bears | 0 | 7 | 7 | 11 | 25 |
| Seahawks | 7 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 24 |
CHI 25 · SEA 24 Final
Passing leader
Nick Foles
CHI · QB
16.8PPR pts
24/35, 250 YDS, 1 TD
Top fantasy scorer
CHI · RB
23.6PPR pts
21 ATT, 45 YDS, 1 TD, 7 REC, 61 REC YDS
Seahawks leader
Rashaad Penny
SEA · RB
19.5PPR pts
17 ATT, 135 YDS, 1 TD
Defensive playmaker
Carlos Dunlap
SEA
2 SACK, 5 TKL
Bears 25, Seahawks 24: Chicago rallies from 10 down at halftime
Chicago erased a 17–7 halftime deficit, outscoring Seattle 18–7 after the break to win 25–24. Seattle outgained the Bears 331–317.
The Seahawks went 3-for-10 on third down, while the Bears kept the ball for 38:25 and finished without a giveaway.
The two teams meet again in Week 8 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +20% third-down rate CHI 50% · SEA 30%
- +16:50 time of possession CHI 38:25 · SEA 21:35
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Bear or Seahawk on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Bears Won
Chicago won the third-down and time of possession battles.
| Bears | Stat | Seahawks |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Third-down conversion | 30% |
| 38:25 | Time of possession | 21:35 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 317 | Total yards | 331 |
| 4.6 | Yards per play | 6.2 |
| 69 | Plays | 53 |
| 0 | Turnovers | 0 |
Scoring Summary
The Bears scored three touchdowns and one field goal; the Seahawks scored three touchdowns and one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | CHI | SEA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 9:00 | SEA | Russell Wilson → DK Metcalf, 41-yard TD Takes leadJason Myers XP | 0 | 7 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 10:15 | CHI | David Montgomery 1-yard TD run Ties gameCairo Santos XP | 7 | 7 |
| 4:47 | SEA | Rashaad Penny 3-yard TD run Takes leadJason Myers XP | 7 | 14 |
| 0:17 | SEA | Jason Myers 36-yard FG Extends lead | 7 | 17 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 5:30 | CHI | Khalil Herbert 20-yard TD runCairo Santos XP | 14 | 17 |
| 3:32 | SEA | Russell Wilson → Gerald Everett, 24-yard TD Extends leadJason Myers XP | 14 | 24 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 10:42 | CHI | Cairo Santos 35-yard FG | 17 | 24 |
| 1:01 | CHI | Nick Foles → Jimmy Graham, 15-yard TD Game winnerNick Foles → Damiere Byrd, 2-pt conversion | 25 | 24 |
Fantasy Points: Bears vs Seahawks, Week 16 2021
Fantasy leaders
- David MontgomeryCHI · RB23.6 PTSRB7
- Rashaad PennySEA · RB19.5 PTSRB9
- Gerald EverettSEA · TE16.8 PTSTE3
- Russell WilsonSEA · QB16.5 PTSQB12
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15.8 | QB13 | 24/35 | 250 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 98.5 | ||
| 16.5 | QB12 | 16/27 | 181 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 104.1 |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.6 | RB7 | RB | 21 | 45 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 61 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 19.5 | RB9 | RB | 17 | 135 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 16.8 | TE3 | TE | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 68 | 1 | ||
| 12.1 | WR35 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 2 | 41 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 11.0 | TE8 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 30 | 1 | ||
| 10.9 | WR42 | WR | 2 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 57 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.8 | RB29 | RB | 2 | 21 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.9 | TE17 | TE | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 49 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.8 | RB36 | RB | 4 | 15 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 23 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.0 | WR69 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 3 | 30 | 0 | ||
| 4.3 | WR82 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 23 | 0 | ||
| 4.1 | WR83 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 11 | 0 | ||
| 3.7 | WR88 | WR | 1 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 0 | ||
| 2.4 | RB66 | RB | 1 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | ||
| 2.0 | WR101 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 10 | 0 | ||
| 1.9 | WR102 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 9 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Cole KmetTE71 snaps96%
Darnell MooneyWR63 snaps85%
Damiere ByrdWR62 snaps84%
David MontgomeryRB58 snaps78%
Dazz NewsomeWR34 snaps46%
Target Share35 targets
- David Montgomery26%, 9 targets
- Darnell Mooney26%, 9 targets
- Cole Kmet14%, 5 targets
- Damiere Byrd9%, 3 targets
- Jimmy Graham6%, 2 targets
- Other20%, 7 targets
Carry Share30 carries
- David Montgomery70%, 21 carries
- Nick Foles13%, 4 carries
- Darnell Mooney7%, 2 carries
- Khalil Herbert7%, 2 carries
- Damien Williams3%, 1 carries
Seattle Seahawks
Snap Share
DK MetcalfWR49 snaps88%
Tyler LockettWR48 snaps86%
Gerald EverettTE47 snaps84%
Rashaad PennyRB30 snaps54%
Freddie SwainWR29 snaps52%
Target Share27 targets
- Tyler Lockett22%, 6 targets
- Gerald Everett19%, 5 targets
- DK Metcalf19%, 5 targets
- DeeJay Dallas15%, 4 targets
- Dee Eskridge11%, 3 targets
- Other15%, 4 targets
Carry Share24 carries
- Rashaad Penny71%, 17 carries
- DeeJay Dallas17%, 4 carries
- Russell Wilson8%, 2 carries
- Dee Eskridge4%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 71 | 96% | 5 | 14% | 0 | |
| 49 | 88% | 5 | 19% | 0 | |
| 48 | 86% | 6 | 22% | 0 | |
| 63 | 85% | 9 | 26% | 2 | |
| 47 | 84% | 5 | 19% | 0 | |
| 62 | 84% | 3 | 9% | 0 | |
| 58 | 78% | 9 | 26% | 21 | |
| 30 | 54% | 1 | 4% | 17 | |
| 29 | 52% | 2 | 7% | 0 | |
| 34 | 46% | 2 | 6% | 0 | |
| 22 | 39% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 22 | 39% | 4 | 15% | 4 | |
| 20 | 36% | 3 | 11% | 1 | |
| 23 | 31% | 2 | 6% | 0 | |
| 21 | 28% | 2 | 6% | 0 | |
| 13 | 18% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 9 | 12% | 2 | 6% | 1 | |
| 8 | 11% | 1 | 3% | 2 | |
| 6 | 11% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 4 | 7% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 2 | 4% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+8.4Gerald Everett16.8 PTS vs 8.4 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−5.5Darnell Mooney10.9 PTS vs 16.4 xFP
- Highest expected volume28.6 xFPDavid Montgomery23.6 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David MontgomeryCHI · RB | 23.6 | 28.6 | −5.0 | 78% | 70% car | — | 0 | 21 | 70% | 9 | 26% |
| Nick FolesCHI · QB | 16.8 | 18.0 | −1.2 | 100% | 35 att | — | 35 | 4 | 13% | 0 | 0% |
| Darnell MooneyCHI · WR | 10.9 | 16.4 | −5.5 | 85% | 26% tgt | — | 0 | 2 | 7% | 9 | 26% |
| Russell WilsonSEA · QB | 16.5 | 13.2 | +3.3 | 100% | 27 att | — | 27 | 2 | 8% | 0 | 0% |
| Rashaad PennySEA · RB | 19.5 | 12.6 | +6.9 | 54% | 71% car | — | 0 | 17 | 71% | 1 | 4% |
| Tyler LockettSEA · WR | 6.0 | 10.1 | −4.1 | 86% | 22% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 22% |
| DeeJay DallasSEA · RB | 7.8 | 9.3 | −1.5 | 39% | 17% car | — | 0 | 4 | 17% | 4 | 15% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 8.9 | 8.4 | +0.5 | 96% | 14% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 14% |
| DK MetcalfSEA · WR | 12.1 | 8.4 | +3.7 | 88% | 19% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 19% |
| Gerald EverettSEA · TE | 16.8 | 8.4 | +8.4 | 84% | 19% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 19% |
| Dee EskridgeSEA · WR | 3.7 | 5.7 | −2.0 | 36% | 11% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 3 | 11% |
| Damiere ByrdCHI · WR | 4.1 | 5.1 | −1.0 | 84% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 9% |
| Damien WilliamsCHI · RB | 2.4 | 4.0 | −1.6 | 12% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 2 | 6% |
| Dazz NewsomeCHI · WR | 2.0 | 3.4 | −1.4 | 46% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
| Freddie SwainSEA · WR | 1.9 | 3.4 | −1.5 | 52% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Jimmy GrahamCHI · TE | 11.0 | 3.4 | +7.6 | 28% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
| Marquise GoodwinCHI · WR | 4.3 | 3.4 | +0.9 | 31% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
| Khalil HerbertCHI · RB | 9.8 | 3.0 | +6.8 | 11% | 7% car | — | 0 | 2 | 7% | 1 | 3% |
| Colby ParkinsonSEA · TE | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 39% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
Team totals: Bears 35 targets and 30 carries; Seahawks 27 targets and 24 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2021 season: 1.68 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.64 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Nick Foles
CHI · QB · 16.8 pts on 18.0 expected
24 of 35 passing for 250 yards, 1 touchdown; 4 carries for 8 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 18.0 expected.
Russell Wilson
SEA · QB · 16.5 pts on 13.2 expected
16 of 27 passing for 181 yards, 2 touchdowns; 2 carries for 13 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 13.2 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 6.5, 19.5, 16.7, 20.2, 5.2, 16.5
W11W12W13W14W15W16
David Montgomery Volume, no payoff
CHI · RB · 23.6 pts on 28.6 expected
9 targets (26% of the team's), 7 catches for 61 yards; 21 carries (70% of the team's) for 45 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 28.6 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 7.7, 10.4, 28.1, 14.1, 10.3, 23.6
W11W12W13W14W15W16
Darnell Mooney Unlucky
CHI · WR · 10.9 pts on 16.4 expected
9 targets (26% of the team's), 5 catches for 57 yards; 2 carries (7% of the team's) for 2 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 16.4 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 23.1, 17.5, 7.7, 2.9, 11.6, 10.9
W11W12W13W14W15W16
Rashaad Penny Ran hot
SEA · RB · 19.5 pts on 12.6 expected
1 target (4% of the team's), 0 catches for 0 yards; 17 carries (71% of the team's) for 135 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 12.6 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 0.7, 1.9, 7.2, 26.8, 6.4, 19.5
W8W11W13W14W15W16
Season high in carries (17).
Tyler Lockett
SEA · WR · 6.0 pts on 10.1 expected
6 targets (22% of the team's), 3 catches for 30 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 10.1 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 4.3, 15.5, 12.6, 19.8, 27.2, 6.0
W10W11W12W13W14W16
Fewest points since Week 10.
Gerald Everett Ran hot
SEA · TE · 16.8 pts on 8.4 expected
5 targets (19% of the team's), 4 catches for 68 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 8.4 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 6.7, 14.7, -1.3, 10.8, 10.0, 16.8
W11W12W13W14W15W16
Best fantasy game of the season.
Jimmy Graham Ran hot
CHI · TE · 11.0 pts on 3.4 expected
2 targets (6% of the team's), 2 catches for 30 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 3.4 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 4.5, 11.4, 9.1, 2.9, 2.3, 11.0
W11W12W13W14W15W16
Best score since Week 12.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Chicago Bears
- ▲Stock up: Damiere Byrd played 84% of the snaps, up from a 53% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Dazz Newsome played 46% of the snaps, down from a 66% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Marquise Goodwin played 31% of the snaps, down from a 46% season average.
Seattle Seahawks
- ▲Stock up: Rashaad Penny played 54% of the snaps, up from a 32% season average.
- ▲Stock up: DeeJay Dallas played 39% of the snaps, up from a 22% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Colby Parkinson played 39% of the snaps, up from a 20% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2021 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Bears D | Seahawks D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 17.7 | 17.2 |
| RBs | 21.5 | 28.9 |
| WRs | 34.4 | 33.2 |
| TEs | 8.7 | 14.4 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Seattle opened at 70% win probability, climbed as high as >99%, then lost.
Seahawks win probability
Key Swings
- −19Montgomery 1-yd TD run85% → 66%Q2 10:15
- +21Penny 3-yd TD run65% → 86%Q2 4:47
- −19Herbert 20-yd TD run94% → 75%Q3 5:30
- +19Wilson → Everett, 24-yd TD75% → 95%Q3 3:32
- −69Foles → Graham, 15-yd TD>99% → 31%Q4 1:01
Swing in Seahawks win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Chicago Bears | Measure | Seattle Seahawks |
|---|---|---|
| 69 | Plays | 53 |
| 57% | Pass rate | 55% |
| 5.9 | Yds / dropback | 5.6 |
| 2.9 | Yds / carry | 7.1 |
| 7/14 | Third downs | 3/10 |
Efficiency edge Chicago ran 16 more plays than Seattle.
- Top targets
- CHI Mooney 26% · Montgomery 26% · Kmet 14%
- SEA Lockett 22% · Metcalf 19% · Everett 19%
Possession Results
| Result | CHI | SEA |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 3 | 3 |
| Field goals | 1 | 1 |
| Punts | 3 | 4 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 0 |
| Turnovers on downs | 2 | 1 |
| Missed field goals | 0 | 1 |
- The Seahawks opened the scoring on their second possession, a 7-play, 80-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
- The Bears drained the clock with two second-half drives of five to eight minutes.
All 21 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEA | Q1 15:00 | 3 | -4 | 1:20 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 13:40 | 3 | 8 | 1:36 | Punt |
| SEA | Q1 12:04 | 7 | 80 | 3:04 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q1 9:00 | 15 | 71 | 8:27 | Downs |
| SEA | Q1 0:33 | 3 | 0 | 1:53 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 13:40 | 5 | 15 | 3:25 | Touchdown |
| SEA | Q2 10:15 | 12 | 74 | 5:28 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 4:47 | 6 | 11 | 3:45 | Punt |
| SEA | Q2 1:02 | 7 | 55 | 0:45 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q2 0:17 | 1 | 12 | 0:17 | End of half |
| CHI | Q3 15:00 | 5 | 1 | 3:09 | Punt |
| SEA | Q3 11:51 | 3 | 6 | 0:54 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 10:57 | 10 | 82 | 5:27 | Touchdown |
| SEA | Q3 5:30 | 4 | 61 | 1:58 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q3 3:32 | 13 | 58 | 7:50 | Field goal |
| SEA | Q4 10:42 | 7 | 47 | 3:24 | Missed FG |
| CHI | Q4 7:18 | 5 | 17 | 2:17 | Downs |
| SEA | Q4 5:01 | 5 | 5 | 2:05 | Punt |
| CHI | Q4 2:56 | 6 | 80 | 1:55 | Touchdown |
| SEA | Q4 1:01 | 4 | 5 | 0:44 | Downs |
| CHI | Q4 0:17 | 1 | -1 | 0:17 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Bears vs Seahawks Head-to-Head
The Bears and Seahawks first met in 1976 and have played 20 times since.
- All-time series
- 12–8Seahawks lead, 20 meetings since 1976
- Postseason
- 2–0Bears won in 2006 and 2010
- Largest Bears win
- 37–62006
- Largest Seahawks win
- 38–91984
Since 2021
1–1 Series tied
2 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- B
- S
Oldest to newest. B = Bears win, S = Seahawks win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 8 Bears at Seahawks Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2024 Wk 17 Seahawks at Bears, 2024 Wk 17 recap SEA 6 CHI 3 SEA W
- 2021 Wk 16 Bears at Seahawks CHI 25 SEA 24 CHI W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2021 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Bears | Stat | Seahawks |
|---|---|---|
| 6-11 | Record | 7-10 |
| 18.3 | Points per game | 23.2 |
| 307.4 | Yards per game | 323.9 |
| 4.9 | Yards per play | 5.8 |
| 23.9 | Points allowed per game | 21.5 |
| 316.7 | Yards allowed per game | 379.1 |
Bears vs Seahawks Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- SEA −7Seahawks failed to cover by 8
- Total
- 41Over: 49 points scored (by 8)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seahawks | 24.0 | 24 | 0.0 |
| Bears | 17.0 | 25 | +8.0 |
The Bears beat their implied total and the Seahawks fell short of theirs; the Fantasy tab has the player lines behind it.
Betting Trends
Each team's 2021 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Chicago Bears
- Against the spread
- 5–10
- Over/under
- 6–9
- ATS as favorite
- 2–1
- ATS as underdog
- 3–9
- ATS on the road
- 3–5
Seattle Seahawks
- Against the spread
- 7–8
- Over/under
- 4–10–1
- ATS as favorite
- 3–5
- ATS as underdog
- 4–3
- ATS at home
- 3–4
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Bears vs Seahawks Fantasy Outlook for 2026
One meeting is left on the 2026 schedule: Week 8 in Seattle. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Bears or Seahawks player start in Week 8? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Bears and Seahawks players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Bears and Seahawks defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere this matchup falls in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2021 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Bears vs Seahawks Game FAQ
Who won the 2021 Bears vs Seahawks Week 16 game?
The Chicago Bears beat the Seattle Seahawks 25–24 in Week 16 of the 2021 season. The game was played at Lumen Field in Seattle, WA, on December 26, 2021. See the Bears' 2021 schedule.
What was the final score of Bears vs Seahawks?
The final score was Bears 25, Seahawks 24. The Seahawks led 17–7 at halftime, and the second half went Bears 18, Seahawks 7.
What happened in the Bears vs Seahawks game?
Chicago erased a 17–7 halftime deficit, outscoring Seattle 18–7 after the break to win 25–24. Seattle outgained the Bears 331–317. David Montgomery led all players with 7 catches for 61 yards, plus 21 carries for 45 rushing yards and a touchdown.
What was the game-winning score in Bears vs Seahawks?
Nick Foles' 15-yard touchdown pass to Jimmy Graham with 1:01 left in the fourth quarter gave the Bears a 25–24 lead they never gave up. It was the final score of the game.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Bears vs Seahawks?
David Montgomery led the game with 23.6 PPR fantasy points, the RB7 of Week 16, on 7 catches for 61 yards, plus 21 carries for 45 rushing yards and a touchdown. Rashaad Penny was next with 19.5 (RB9). See David Montgomery's 2021 game log.
Who led Bears vs Seahawks in passing, rushing and receiving?
Nick Foles (CHI) led all passers with 24 of 35 for 250 yards and a touchdown. Rashaad Penny (SEA) led in rushing with 17 carries for 135 yards and a touchdown. Gerald Everett (SEA) led in receiving with 4 catches for 68 yards and a touchdown.
How many fantasy points did David Montgomery score against the Seahawks?
David Montgomery scored 23.6 points in PPR leagues, 20.1 in half-PPR and 16.6 in standard scoring against the Seahawks in Week 16 of the 2021 season, on 7 catches for 61 yards, plus 21 carries for 45 rushing yards and a touchdown. He drew 26% of his team's targets.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Bears vs Seahawks?
Gerald Everett outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 16.8 PPR points on 8.4 xFP (+8.4). Darnell Mooney fell furthest short, with 10.9 points on 16.4 xFP (−5.5). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
How did the Bears come back to beat the Seahawks?
The Bears' chances of winning fell as low as <1% in the fourth quarter. Nick Foles' 15-yard touchdown pass to Jimmy Graham in the fourth quarter was the biggest swing of the game. Nick Foles' 15-yard touchdown pass to Jimmy Graham then put them ahead for good.
What is the all-time Bears vs Seahawks record?
The Seahawks lead the all-time series 12–8 across 20 meetings since 1976, including a 0–2 record in the postseason.
When did the Bears and Seahawks last play before this game?
Before Week 16 of 2021, they last met in the 2018 season on September 17, 2018, when the Bears beat the Seahawks 24–17.
Have the Bears and Seahawks met in the playoffs?
Yes, 2 times, most recently in the 2010 playoffs. The Bears are 2–0 against the Seahawks in the postseason.
What was the closing spread for Bears vs Seahawks?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Seahawks −7, making the Seattle Seahawks 7-point favorites, with a closing total of 41. That implied about 24.0 points for the Seahawks and 17.0 for the Bears.
Did Bears vs Seahawks go over or under the total?
The game went over. The consensus closing total was 41, and the teams combined for 49 points, 8 over the number.
Who covered the spread in Bears vs Seahawks?
The Bears covered as 7-point underdogs against the closing line of Seahawks −7. The final margin was 1 point.
