Final2022 Week 5
Northwest Stadium, Landover, MD|
Tennessee Titans vs Washington Commanders, Week 5 2022
Tennessee Titans
AwayWon
21
Washington Commanders
Home
17
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Titans | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 21 |
| Commanders | 3 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 17 |
TEN 21 · WAS 17 Final
Passing leader
WAS · QB
22.9PPR pts
25/38, 359 YDS, 2 TD, 1 INT
Top fantasy scorer
TEN · RB
27.2PPR pts
28 ATT, 102 YDS, 2 TD, 2 REC, 30 REC YDS
Commanders leader
WAS · WR
24.5PPR pts
2 REC, 105 YDS, 2 TD
Defensive playmaker
David Long Jr.
TEN
1 INT, 12 TKL
Titans 21, Commanders 17: Tennessee beats Washington
Tennessee led 14–10 at halftime to win 21–17. Washington outgained the Titans 385–241.
The Commanders went 1-for-11 on third down and committed one turnover, while the Titans kept the ball for 32:40 and finished without a giveaway.
The two teams meet again in Week 13 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +1 turnover margin TEN 0 turnovers
- +20% third-down rate TEN 29% · WAS 9%
- +5:20 time of possession TEN 32:40 · WAS 27:20
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Titan or Commander on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Titans Won
Tennessee won the turnover, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Titans | Stat | Commanders |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Turnovers | 1 |
| 29% | Third-down conversion | 9% |
| 32:40 | Time of possession | 27:20 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 241 | Total yards | 385 |
| 3.9 | Yards per play | 6.6 |
| 62 | Plays | 58 |
Scoring Summary
The Titans scored three touchdowns; the Commanders scored two touchdowns and one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | TEN | WAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 3:58 | TEN | Ryan Tannehill → Dontrell Hilliard, 13-yard TD Takes leadRandy Bullock XP | 7 | 0 |
| 0:26 | WAS | Joey Slye 50-yard FG | 7 | 3 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 13:56 | WAS | Carson Wentz → Dyami Brown, 75-yard TD Takes leadJoey Slye XP | 7 | 10 |
| 0:17 | TEN | Derrick Henry 1-yard TD run Takes leadRandy Bullock XP | 14 | 10 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 4:36 | WAS | Carson Wentz → Dyami Brown, 30-yard TD Takes leadJoey Slye XP | 14 | 17 |
| 1:03 | TEN | Derrick Henry 1-yard TD run Takes leadRandy Bullock XP | 21 | 17 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| No scoring | ||||
Fantasy Points: Titans vs Commanders, Week 5 2022
Fantasy leaders
- Derrick HenryTEN · RB27.2 PTSRB5
- Dyami BrownWAS · WR24.5 PTSWR6
- Carson WentzWAS · QB22.9 PTSQB6
- Terry McLaurinWAS · WR12.6 PTSWR27
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.9 | QB6 | 25/38 | 359 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 15 | 0 | 102.9 | Start/Sit → | |
| 11.5 | QB22 | 15/25 | 181 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 95.6 |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27.2 | RB5 | RB | 28 | 102 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 30 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 24.5 | WR6 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 105 | 2 | Start/Sit → | |
| 12.6 | WR27 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 5 | 76 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 12.3 | RB26 | RB | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 23 | 1 | ||
| 12.2 | WR30 | WR | — | — | — | 8 | 6 | 62 | 0 | ||
| 9.2 | WR45 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 72 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.7 | RB36 | RB | — | — | — | 7 | 5 | 37 | 0 | ||
| 7.7 | WR55 | WR | — | — | — | 8 | 4 | 37 | 0 | ||
| 6.9 | RB44 | RB | 3 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 33 | 0 | ||
| 6.9 | TE22 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 39 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.2 | RB66 | RB | 9 | 22 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 1.7 | WR103 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0 | ||
| 1.7 | WR105 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0 | ||
| 1.7 | TE41 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.5 | TE46 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Tennessee Titans
Snap Share
Nick Westbrook-IkhineWR59 snaps92%
Robert WoodsWR54 snaps84%
Geoff SwaimTE42 snaps66%
Derrick HenryRB41 snaps64%
Austin HooperTE34 snaps53%
Target Share23 targets
- Robert Woods35%, 8 targets
- Dontrell Hilliard22%, 5 targets
- Nick Westbrook-Ikhine13%, 3 targets
- Derrick Henry9%, 2 targets
- Kyle Philips9%, 2 targets
- Other13%, 3 targets
Carry Share32 carries
- Derrick Henry88%, 28 carries
- Ryan Tannehill9%, 3 carries
- Dontrell Hilliard3%, 1 carries
Washington Commanders
Snap Share
Terry McLaurinWR62 snaps98%
Curtis SamuelWR57 snaps90%
Cam SimsWR37 snaps59%
John BatesTE37 snaps59%
Cole TurnerTE32 snaps51%
Target Share37 targets
- Curtis Samuel22%, 8 targets
- J.D. McKissic19%, 7 targets
- Terry McLaurin16%, 6 targets
- Antonio Gibson11%, 4 targets
- Dyami Brown11%, 4 targets
- Other22%, 8 targets
Carry Share17 carries
- Brian Robinson53%, 9 carries
- Carson Wentz29%, 5 carries
- Antonio Gibson18%, 3 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 62 | 98% | 6 | 16% | 0 | |
| 59 | 92% | 3 | 13% | 0 | |
| 57 | 90% | 8 | 22% | 0 | |
| 54 | 84% | 8 | 35% | 0 | |
| 42 | 66% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 41 | 64% | 2 | 9% | 28 | |
| 37 | 59% | 2 | 5% | 0 | |
| 37 | 59% | 3 | 8% | 0 | |
| 34 | 53% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 32 | 51% | 3 | 8% | 0 | |
| 26 | 41% | 7 | 19% | 0 | |
| 20 | 32% | 4 | 11% | 3 | |
| 20 | 32% | 4 | 11% | 0 | |
| 20 | 31% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 20 | 31% | 5 | 22% | 1 | |
| 18 | 29% | 0 | 0% | 9 | |
| 18 | 28% | 2 | 9% | 0 | |
| 13 | 20% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 5 | 8% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 5 | 8% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 5 | 8% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 2 | 3% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+17.8Dyami Brown24.5 PTS vs 6.7 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−5.6Robert Woods7.7 PTS vs 13.3 xFP
- Highest expected volume21.4 xFPDerrick Henry27.2 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derrick HenryTEN · RB | 27.2 | 21.4 | +5.8 | 64% | 88% car | — | 0 | 28 | 88% | 2 | 9% |
| Carson WentzWAS · QB | 22.9 | 19.3 | +3.6 | 100% | 38 att | — | 38 | 5 | 29% | 0 | 0% |
| Curtis SamuelWAS · WR | 12.2 | 13.3 | −1.1 | 90% | 22% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 22% |
| Robert WoodsTEN · WR | 7.7 | 13.3 | −5.6 | 84% | 35% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 35% |
| Ryan TannehillTEN · QB | 11.5 | 12.5 | −1.0 | 100% | 25 att | — | 25 | 3 | 9% | 0 | 0% |
| J.D. McKissicWAS · RB | 8.7 | 11.7 | −3.0 | 41% | 19% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 19% |
| Terry McLaurinWAS · WR | 12.6 | 10.0 | +2.6 | 98% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 16% |
| Dontrell HilliardTEN · RB | 12.3 | 9.0 | +3.3 | 31% | 22% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 5 | 22% |
| Antonio GibsonWAS · RB | 6.9 | 8.6 | −1.7 | 32% | 18% car | — | 0 | 3 | 18% | 4 | 11% |
| Dyami BrownWAS · WR | 24.5 | 6.7 | +17.8 | 32% | 11% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 11% |
| Brian Robinson Jr.WAS · RB | 2.2 | 5.8 | −3.6 | 29% | 53% car | — | 0 | 9 | 53% | 0 | 0% |
| Cole TurnerWAS · TE | 0.0 | 5.0 | −5.0 | 51% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 8% |
| John BatesWAS · TE | 6.9 | 5.0 | +1.9 | 59% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 8% |
| Nick Westbrook-IkhineTEN · WR | 9.2 | 5.0 | +4.2 | 92% | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 13% |
| Cam SimsWAS · WR | 1.7 | 3.3 | −1.6 | 59% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 5% |
| Kyle PhilipsTEN · WR | 1.7 | 3.3 | −1.6 | 28% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 9% |
| Austin HooperTEN · TE | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 53% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Chig OkonkwoTEN · TE | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 20% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Geoff SwaimTEN · TE | 1.5 | 1.7 | −0.2 | 66% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
Team totals: Titans 23 targets and 32 carries; Commanders 37 targets and 17 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2022 season: 1.67 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.64 per carry and 0.42 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Ryan Tannehill
TEN · QB · 11.5 pts on 12.5 expected
15 of 25 passing for 181 yards, 1 touchdown; 3 carries for 3 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 12.5 expected.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 19.3, 2.9, 18.8, 14.4, 11.5
W1W2W3W4W5
Carson Wentz
WAS · QB · 22.9 pts on 19.3 expected
25 of 38 passing for 359 yards, 2 touchdowns, 1 interception; 5 carries for 15 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 19.3 expected.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 29.7, 27.8, 6.6, 9.3, 22.9
W1W2W3W4W5
Derrick Henry Ran hot
TEN · RB · 27.2 pts on 21.4 expected
2 targets (9% of the team's), 2 catches for 30 yards; 28 carries (88% of the team's) for 102 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 21.4 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 7.2, 8.5, 25.3, 23.7, 27.2
W1W2W3W4W5
Season high in carries (28). Best fantasy game of the season.
Robert Woods Volume, no payoff
TEN · WR · 7.7 pts on 13.3 expected
8 targets (35% of the team's), 4 catches for 37 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 13.3 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 2.3, 7.9, 12.5, 13.0, 7.7
W1W2W3W4W5
Fewest points since Week 1.
Curtis Samuel
WAS · WR · 12.2 pts on 13.3 expected
8 targets (22% of the team's), 6 catches for 62 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 13.3 expected.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 18.2, 22.9, 13.1, 7.8, 12.2
W1W2W3W4W5
J.D. McKissic
WAS · RB · 8.7 pts on 11.7 expected
7 targets (19% of the team's), 5 catches for 37 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 11.7 expected.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 7.8, 13.3, 10.0, 8.6, 8.7
W1W2W3W4W5
Dyami Brown Ran hot
WAS · WR · 24.5 pts on 6.7 expected
4 targets (11% of the team's), 2 catches for 105 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 6.7 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.6, 24.5
W1W2W3W4W5
Best fantasy game of the season.
Cole Turner Unlucky
WAS · TE · 0.0 pts on 5.0 expected
3 targets (8% of the team's), 0 catches for 0 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 5.0 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Tennessee Titans
- ▲Stock up: Nick Westbrook-Ikhine played 92% of the snaps, up from a 63% season average.
Washington Commanders
- ▲Stock up: J.D. McKissic led the backfield with 41% of the snaps after trailing Antonio Gibson before this game.
- ▲Stock up: Dyami Brown played 32% of the snaps, up from a 12% season average.
- ▲Stock up: John Bates played 59% of the snaps, up from a 38% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2022 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Titans D | Commanders D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 19.5 | 16.6 |
| RBs | 17.3 | 17.2 |
| WRs | 39.8 | 32.1 |
| TEs | 14.9 | 9.1 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Washington opened at 53% win probability and fell below 2% in the fourth quarter.
Commanders win probability
Key Swings
- −22Tannehill → Hilliard, 13-yd TD53% → 31%Q1 3:58
- +24Wentz → Brown, 75-yd TD39% → 63%Q2 13:56
- −28Henry 1-yd TD run64% → 36%Q2 0:17
- +35Wentz → Brown, 30-yd TD32% → 67%Q3 4:36
- −38Henry 1-yd TD run68% → 30%Q3 1:03
Swing in Commanders win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Tennessee Titans | Measure | Washington Commanders |
|---|---|---|
| 62 | Plays | 58 |
| 48% | Pass rate | 71% |
| 4.5 | Yds / dropback | 8.3 |
| 3.3 | Yds / carry | 2.5 |
| 4/14 | Third downs | 1/11 |
Efficiency edge Tennessee ran 4 more plays and gained 0.8 more yards per carry.
- Top targets
- TEN Woods 35% · Hilliard 22% · Westbrook-Ikhine 13%
- WAS Samuel 22% · McKissic 19% · McLaurin 16%
Possession Results
| Result | TEN | WAS |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 3 | 2 |
| Field goals | 0 | 1 |
| Punts | 8 | 6 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 1 |
| Turnovers on downs | 0 | 1 |
TEN turnover edge: +1
- The Titans opened the scoring on their third possession, a 6-play, 52-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
All 24 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEN | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 4 | 1:36 | Punt |
| WAS | Q1 13:24 | 3 | 6 | 1:31 | Punt |
| TEN | Q1 11:53 | 5 | 16 | 3:24 | Punt |
| WAS | Q1 8:29 | 3 | -1 | 1:59 | Punt |
| TEN | Q1 6:30 | 6 | 52 | 2:32 | Touchdown |
| WAS | Q1 3:58 | 7 | 43 | 3:32 | Field goal |
| TEN | Q1 0:26 | 3 | -2 | 1:20 | Punt |
| WAS | Q2 14:06 | 1 | 75 | 0:10 | Touchdown |
| TEN | Q2 13:56 | 6 | -6 | 3:56 | Punt |
| WAS | Q2 10:00 | 5 | 25 | 2:46 | Punt |
| TEN | Q2 7:14 | 15 | 81 | 6:57 | Touchdown |
| WAS | Q2 0:17 | 1 | -1 | 0:17 | End of half |
| WAS | Q3 15:00 | 4 | 40 | 2:26 | Punt |
| TEN | Q3 12:34 | 3 | 0 | 1:34 | Punt |
| WAS | Q3 11:00 | 4 | 6 | 1:32 | Downs |
| TEN | Q3 9:28 | 3 | -6 | 1:38 | Punt |
| WAS | Q3 7:50 | 6 | 80 | 3:14 | Touchdown |
| TEN | Q3 4:36 | 7 | 75 | 3:33 | Touchdown |
| WAS | Q3 1:03 | 3 | -12 | 2:28 | Punt |
| TEN | Q4 13:35 | 7 | 0 | 3:42 | Punt |
| WAS | Q4 9:53 | 4 | 20 | 2:45 | Punt |
| TEN | Q4 7:08 | 3 | 5 | 2:22 | Punt |
| WAS | Q4 4:46 | 18 | 87 | 4:40 | Interception |
| TEN | Q4 0:06 | 1 | 2 | 0:06 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Titans vs Commanders Head-to-Head
The Titans and Commanders first met in 1971 and have played 15 times since.
- All-time series
- 8–7Titans lead, 15 meetings since 1971
- Postseason
- 0No playoff meetings
- Largest Titans win
- 41–171988
- Largest Commanders win
- 42–192024
Since 2021
1–1 Series tied
2 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- T
- C
Oldest to newest. T = Titans win, C = Commanders win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 13 Commanders at Titans Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2024 Wk 13 Titans at Commanders, 2024 Wk 13 recap WAS 42 TEN 19 WAS W
- 2022 Wk 5 Titans at Commanders TEN 21 WAS 17 TEN W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2022 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Titans | Stat | Commanders |
|---|---|---|
| 7-10 | Record | 8-8-1 |
| 17.5 | Points per game | 18.9 |
| 296.8 | Yards per game | 330.3 |
| 5.1 | Yards per play | 4.9 |
| 21.1 | Points allowed per game | 20.2 |
| 351.6 | Yards allowed per game | 304.6 |
Titans vs Commanders Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- WAS −1Commanders failed to cover by 5
- Total
- 43Under: 38 points scored (by 5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commanders | 22.0 | 17 | −5.0 |
| Titans | 21.0 | 21 | 0.0 |
The Titans beat their implied total and the Commanders fell short of theirs; the Fantasy tab has the player lines behind it.
Betting Trends
Each team's 2022 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Tennessee Titans
- Against the spread
- 3–2
- Over/under
- 2–3
- ATS as favorite
- 0–1
- ATS as underdog
- 3–1
- ATS on the road
- 2–1
Washington Commanders
- Against the spread
- 1–4
- Over/under
- 2–3
- ATS as favorite
- 1–2
- ATS as underdog
- 0–2
- ATS at home
- 1–2
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Titans vs Commanders Fantasy Outlook for 2026
One meeting is left on the 2026 schedule: Week 13 in Tennessee. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Titans or Commanders player start in Week 13? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Titans and Commanders players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Titans and Commanders defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere this matchup falls in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2022 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Titans vs Commanders Game FAQ
Who won the 2022 Titans vs Commanders Week 5 game?
The Tennessee Titans beat the Washington Commanders 21–17 in Week 5 of the 2022 season. The game was played at Northwest Stadium in Landover, MD, on October 9, 2022. See the Titans' 2022 schedule.
What was the final score of Titans vs Commanders?
The final score was Titans 21, Commanders 17. The Titans led 14–10 at halftime, and the second half went Titans 7, Commanders 7.
What happened in the Titans vs Commanders game?
Tennessee led 14–10 at halftime to win 21–17. Washington outgained the Titans 385–241. Derrick Henry led all players with 2 catches for 30 yards, plus 28 carries for 102 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. The Commanders committed 1 turnover, the Titans none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Titans vs Commanders?
Derrick Henry led the game with 27.2 PPR fantasy points, the RB5 of Week 5, on 2 catches for 30 yards, plus 28 carries for 102 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. Dyami Brown was next with 24.5 (WR6). See Derrick Henry's 2022 game log.
Who led Titans vs Commanders in passing, rushing and receiving?
Carson Wentz (WAS) led all passers with 25 of 38 for 359 yards, 2 touchdowns and an interception. Derrick Henry (TEN) led in rushing with 28 carries for 102 yards and 2 touchdowns. Dyami Brown (WAS) led in receiving with 2 catches for 105 yards and 2 touchdowns.
How many fantasy points did Derrick Henry score against the Commanders?
Derrick Henry scored 27.2 points in PPR leagues, 26.2 in half-PPR and 25.2 in standard scoring against the Commanders in Week 5 of the 2022 season, on 2 catches for 30 yards, plus 28 carries for 102 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. He handled 88% of his team's carries.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Titans vs Commanders?
Dyami Brown outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 24.5 PPR points on 6.7 xFP (+17.8). Robert Woods fell furthest short, with 7.7 points on 13.3 xFP (−5.6). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Titans vs Commanders?
Derrick Henry had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 21.4 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 27.2. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Titans beat the Commanders?
The Titans beat the Commanders 21–17 because they won the turnover battle 1–0.
Which team won the turnover battle in Titans vs Commanders?
The Titans won the turnover battle 1–0: the Commanders gave the ball away 1 time and the Titans not at all. The Titans won the game.
What is the all-time Titans vs Commanders record?
The Titans lead the all-time series 8–7 across 15 meetings since 1971.
When did the Titans and Commanders last play before this game?
Before Week 5 of 2022, they last met in the 2018 season on December 22, 2018, when the Titans beat the Commanders 25–16.
What was the closing spread for Titans vs Commanders?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Commanders −1, making the Washington Commanders 1-point favorites, with a closing total of 43. That implied about 22.0 points for the Commanders and 21.0 for the Titans.
Did Titans vs Commanders go over or under the total?
The game went under. The consensus closing total was 43, and the teams combined for 38 points, 5 under the number.
Who covered the spread in Titans vs Commanders?
The Titans covered as 1-point underdogs against the closing line of Commanders −1. The final margin was 4 points.
