Washington Commanders vs Chicago Bears, Week 6 2022
Washington Commanders
AwayWon
12
Chicago Bears
Home
7
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commanders | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 12 |
| Bears | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
WAS 12CHI 7 Final
Passing leader
19.4PPR pts
14/27, 190 YDS, 1 TD, 1 INT
Top fantasy scorer
Dante Pettis
18.4PPR pts
4 REC, 84 YDS, 1 TD
Bears leader
13.8PPR pts
7 REC, 68 YDS
Defensive playmaker
Jonathan Allen
1 INT, 1 SACK, 4 TKL
Commanders 12, Bears 7: Washington rallies in the fourth quarter
Washington led 3–0 at halftime and outscored Chicago 9–7 after the break to win 12–7. Chicago outgained the Commanders 391–214.
Chicago didn't get on the board until the third quarter.
The Bears went 5-for-13 on third down and committed two turnovers, while the Commanders finished without a giveaway.
Key advantages
- +2 turnover margin WAS 0 turnovers
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Commander or Bear on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Commanders Won
Washington won the turnover battle.
| Commanders | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Turnovers | 2 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 214 | Total yards | 391 |
| 4.0 | Yards per play | 5.7 |
| 53 | Plays | 69 |
| 18% | Third-down conversion | 38% |
| 27:48 | Time of possession | 32:12 |
Scoring Summary
The Commanders scored one touchdown and two field goals; the Bears scored one touchdown.
| Time | Team | Play | WAS | CHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| No scoring | ||||
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 0:46 | WAS | Joey Slye 38-yard FG Takes lead | 3 | 0 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 7:16 | CHI | Justin Fields → Dante Pettis, 40-yard TD Takes leadCairo Santos XP | 3 | 7 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 14:51 | WAS | Joey Slye 28-yard FG | 6 | 7 |
| 7:21 | WAS | Brian Robinson 1-yard TD run Game winner2-pt try failed | 12 | 7 |
Fantasy Points: Commanders vs Bears, Week 6 2022
Fantasy leaders
- Justin Fields19.4 PTSQB8
- Dante Pettis18.4 PTSWR10
- Darnell Mooney13.8 PTSWR26
- Brian Robinson12.0 PTSRB19
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Fields | 19.4 | QB8 | 14/27 | 190 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 88 | 0 | 71.5 | Start/Sit → |
| Carson Wentz | 4.2 | QB29 | 12/22 | 99 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 66.3 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dante Pettis | 18.4 | WR10 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 4 | 84 | 1 | |
| Darnell Mooney | 13.8 | WR26 | WR | — | — | — | 12 | 7 | 68 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Brian Robinson | 12.0 | RB19 | RB | 17 | 60 | 1 | — | — | — | — | |
| David Montgomery | 9.0 | RB23 | RB | 15 | 67 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Antonio Gibson | 8.3 | RB24 | RB | 5 | 35 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 18 | 0 | |
| Terry McLaurin | 8.2 | WR46 | WR | 2 | 11 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 41 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Khalil Herbert | 7.4 | RB28 | RB | 7 | 74 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → |
| Cole Turner | 4.3 | TE30 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 23 | 0 | |
| Curtis Samuel | 2.6 | WR76 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 2 | 6 | 0 | |
| Cole Kmet | 2.5 | TE43 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 15 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| J.D. McKissic | 2.0 | RB51 | RB | 2 | 20 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Cam Sims | 1.6 | WR89 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 6 | 0 | |
| Dax Milne | 1.5 | WR90 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | |
| Velus Jones | 0.8 | WR94 | WR | 1 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | |
| Equanimeous St. Brown | 0.1 | WR96 | WR | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | — | |
| Ryan Griffin | 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Dyami Brown | 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Ihmir Smith-Marsette | -0.1 | — | WR | 1 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fantasy Usage
Washington Commanders
Snap Share
Target Share22 targets
- Curtis Samuel23%, 5 targets
- Terry McLaurin18%, 4 targets
- Antonio Gibson18%, 4 targets
- J.D. McKissic14%, 3 targets
- Cam Sims9%, 2 targets
- Other18%, 4 targets
Carry Share28 carries
- , 17 carries
- , 5 carries
- , 2 carries
- , 2 carries
- , 2 carries
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Target Share26 targets
- Darnell Mooney46%, 12 targets
- Dante Pettis27%, 7 targets
- Cole Kmet12%, 3 targets
- Ryan Griffin4%, 1 targets
- David Montgomery4%, 1 targets
- Other8%, 2 targets
Carry Share37 carries
- , 15 carries
- , 12 carries
- , 7 carries
- , 1 carries
- , 1 carries
- , 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terry McLaurin | 56 | 98% | 4 | 18% | 2 |
| Cole Kmet | 67 | 93% | 3 | 12% | 0 |
| Cole Turner | 53 | 93% | 2 | 9% | 0 |
| Darnell Mooney | 66 | 92% | 12 | 46% | 0 |
| Curtis Samuel | 49 | 86% | 5 | 23% | 0 |
| David Montgomery | 56 | 78% | 1 | 4% | 15 |
| Cam Sims | 41 | 72% | 2 | 9% | 0 |
| Equanimeous St. Brown | 46 | 64% | 0 | 0% | 1 |
| Dante Pettis | 44 | 61% | 7 | 27% | 0 |
| Brian Robinson | 27 | 47% | 0 | 0% | 17 |
| Ihmir Smith-Marsette | 25 | 35% | 1 | 4% | 1 |
| Armani Rogers | 18 | 32% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
| J.D. McKissic | 17 | 30% | 3 | 14% | 2 |
| Antonio Gibson | 15 | 26% | 4 | 18% | 5 |
| Trevon Wesco | 16 | 22% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
| Khalil Herbert | 16 | 22% | 0 | 0% | 7 |
| Velus Jones | 12 | 17% | 1 | 4% | 1 |
| Dax Milne | 6 | 11% | 1 | 5% | 0 |
| Dyami Brown | 3 | 5% | 1 | 5% | 0 |
| Ryan Griffin | 3 | 4% | 1 | 4% | 0 |
| Trestan Ebner | 3 | 4% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+6.7Dante Pettis18.4 PTS vs 11.7 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−6.4Carson Wentz4.2 PTS vs 10.6 xFP
- Highest expected volume20.0 xFPDarnell Mooney13.8 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darnell MooneyCHI · WR | 13.8 | 20.0 | −6.2 | 92% | 46% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 12 | 46% |
| Justin FieldsCHI · QB | 19.4 | 19.2 | +0.2 | 100% | 27 att | — | 27 | 12 | 32% | 0 | 0% |
| Dante PettisCHI · WR | 18.4 | 11.7 | +6.7 | 61% | 27% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 27% |
| David MontgomeryCHI · RB | 9.0 | 11.3 | −2.3 | 78% | 41% car | — | 0 | 15 | 41% | 1 | 4% |
| Brian Robinson Jr.WAS · RB | 12.0 | 10.9 | +1.1 | 47% | 61% car | — | 0 | 17 | 61% | 0 | 0% |
| Carson WentzWAS · QB | 4.2 | 10.6 | −6.4 | 100% | 22 att | — | 22 | 2 | 7% | 0 | 0% |
| Antonio GibsonWAS · RB | 8.3 | 9.9 | −1.6 | 26% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 5 | 18% | 4 | 18% |
| Curtis SamuelWAS · WR | 2.6 | 8.3 | −5.7 | 86% | 23% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 23% |
| Terry McLaurinWAS · WR | 8.2 | 7.9 | +0.3 | 98% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 2 | 7% | 4 | 18% |
| J.D. McKissicWAS · RB | 2.0 | 6.3 | −4.3 | 30% | 14% tgt | — | 0 | 2 | 7% | 3 | 14% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 2.5 | 5.0 | −2.5 | 93% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 12% |
| Khalil HerbertCHI · RB | 7.4 | 4.5 | +2.9 | 22% | 19% car | — | 0 | 7 | 19% | 0 | 0% |
| Cam SimsWAS · WR | 1.6 | 3.3 | −1.7 | 72% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 9% |
| Cole TurnerWAS · TE | 4.3 | 3.3 | +1.0 | 93% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 9% |
| Ihmir Smith-MarsetteCHI · WR | -0.1 | 2.3 | −2.4 | 35% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 1 | 4% |
| Velus Jones Jr.CHI · WR | 0.8 | 2.3 | −1.5 | 17% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 1 | 4% |
| Dax MilneWAS · WR | 1.5 | 1.7 | −0.2 | 11% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 5% |
| Dyami BrownWAS · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 5% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 5% |
| Ryan GriffinCHI · — | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 4% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Equanimeous St. BrownCHI · WR | 0.1 | 0.6 | −0.5 | 64% | 3% car | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Commanders 22 targets and 28 carries; Bears 26 targets and 37 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2022 season: 1.67 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.64 per carry and 0.42 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Carson Wentz Unlucky
12 of 22 passing for 99 yards; 2 carries for 2 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 10.6 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
No interceptions after 4 in the previous four games. Lowest-scoring game of the season.
Justin Fields
14 of 27 passing for 190 yards, 1 touchdown, 1 interception; 12 carries for 88 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 19.2 expected.
Best fantasy game of the season.
Brian Robinson Jr. Strong role
17 carries (61% of the team's) for 60 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 10.9 expected.
Trend: Season high in carries (17).
Antonio Gibson
4 targets (18% of the team's), 3 catches for 18 yards; 5 carries (18% of the team's) for 35 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 9.9 expected.
Darnell Mooney Volume, no payoff
12 targets (46% of the team's), 7 catches for 68 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 20.0 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Season high in targets (12). Best fantasy game of the season.
Dante Pettis Ran hot
7 targets (27% of the team's), 4 catches for 84 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 11.7 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Season high in targets (7). Best fantasy game of the season.
Curtis Samuel Unlucky
5 targets (23% of the team's), 2 catches for 6 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 8.3 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Lowest-scoring game of the season.
Cam Sims
2 targets (9% of the team's), 1 catch for 6 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 3.3 expected.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Washington Commanders
- Stock up: Brian Robinson Jr. led the backfield with 47% of the snaps after trailing Antonio Gibson before this game.
- Stock up: Cam Sims played 72% of the snaps, up from a 19% season average.
- Stock up: Cole Turner played 93% of the snaps, up from a 51% season average.
Chicago Bears
- Stock up: David Montgomery played 78% of the snaps, up from a 59% season average.
- Stock up: Ihmir Smith-Marsette played 35% of the snaps, up from a 15% season average.
- Stock down: Khalil Herbert played 22% of the snaps, down from a 43% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2022 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Commanders D | Bears D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 16.6 | 18.5 |
| RBs | 17.2 | 27.3 |
| WRs | 32.1 | 32.7 |
| TEs | 9.1 | 9.0 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Chicago opened at 47% win probability and fell below 2% in the fourth quarter.
Bears win probability
Key Swings
- −12Slye 38-yd FG48% → 36%Q2 0:46
- +33Fields → Pettis, 40-yd TD34% → 67%Q3 7:16
- −17Slye 28-yd FG71% → 54%Q4 14:51
- −43Robinson 1-yd TD run57% → 14%Q4 7:21
Swing in Bears win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Washington Commanders | Measure | Chicago Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 53 | Plays | 69 |
| 47% | Pass rate | 46% |
| 3.4 | Yds / dropback | 4.8 |
| 4.6 | Yds / carry | 6.4 |
| 2/11 | Third downs | 5/13 |
Efficiency edge Washington ran 16 fewer plays than Chicago.
- Top targets
- WAS Samuel 23% · Gibson 18% · McLaurin 18%
- CHI Mooney 46% · Pettis 27% · Kmet 12%
Possession Results
| Result | WAS | CHI |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 1 | 1 |
| Field goals | 2 | 0 |
| Punts | 6 | 4 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 1 |
| Turnovers on downs | 0 | 3 |
| Missed field goals | 1 | 0 |
WAS turnover edge: +1
- The Commanders opened the scoring on their fifth possession, a 9-play, 57-yard drive that ended in a field goal.
All 21 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 7 | 6 | 3:53 | Punt |
| WAS | Q1 11:07 | 3 | -5 | 1:51 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 9:16 | 11 | 61 | 6:58 | Interception |
| WAS | Q1 2:18 | 5 | 18 | 3:17 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 14:01 | 5 | 68 | 2:43 | Downs |
| WAS | Q2 11:18 | 6 | 27 | 3:15 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 8:03 | 4 | 33 | 2:02 | Punt |
| WAS | Q2 6:01 | 4 | 20 | 2:14 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 3:47 | 3 | 6 | 1:24 | Punt |
| WAS | Q2 2:23 | 9 | 57 | 1:37 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q2 0:46 | 6 | 30 | 0:46 | End of half |
| WAS | Q3 15:00 | 5 | 19 | 3:47 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 11:13 | 9 | 94 | 3:57 | Touchdown |
| WAS | Q3 7:16 | 13 | 65 | 7:25 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q4 14:51 | 6 | 8 | 4:17 | Punt |
| WAS | Q4 10:34 | 3 | 4 | 2:28 | Punt |
| WAS | Q4 8:06 | 2 | 6 | 0:45 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q4 7:21 | 10 | 27 | 4:53 | Downs |
| WAS | Q4 2:28 | 5 | 22 | 0:39 | Missed FG |
| CHI | Q4 1:49 | 8 | 61 | 1:19 | Downs |
| WAS | Q4 0:30 | 1 | 0 | 0:30 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Commanders vs Bears Head-to-Head
The Commanders and Bears first met in 1932 and have played 55 times since.
- All-time series
- 28–26–1Commanders lead, 55 meetings since 1932
- Postseason
- 4–3Split 4–3
- Largest Commanders win
- 42–01974
- Largest Bears win
- 73–01940
Since 2021
2–2 Series tied
4 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
Oldest to newest. C = Commanders win, B = Bears win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wk 6 Bears at Commanders, 2025 Wk 6 recap CHI 25 WAS 24 CHI W
- 2024 Wk 8 Bears at Commanders, 2024 Wk 8 recap WAS 18 CHI 15 WAS W
- 2023 Wk 5 Bears at Commanders, 2023 Wk 5 recap CHI 40 WAS 20 CHI W
- 2022 Wk 6 Commanders at Bears WAS 12 CHI 7 WAS W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2022 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Commanders | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 8-8-1 | Record | 3-14 |
| 18.9 | Points per game | 19.2 |
| 330.3 | Yards per game | 307.8 |
| 4.9 | Yards per play | 5.3 |
| 20.2 | Points allowed per game | 27.2 |
| 304.6 | Yards allowed per game | 375.9 |
Commanders vs Bears Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- WAS −1Commanders covered by 4
- Total
- 38.5Under: 19 points scored (by 19.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commanders | 19.8 | 12 | −7.8 |
| Bears | 18.8 | 7 | −11.8 |
Both offenses finished under the market's expectation, which matches the low fantasy output in the Fantasy tab.
Betting Trends
Each team's 2022 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Washington Commanders
- Against the spread
- 2–4
- Over/under
- 2–4
- ATS as favorite
- 2–2
- ATS as underdog
- 0–2
- ATS on the road
- 1–2
Chicago Bears
- Against the spread
- 2–3–1
- Over/under
- 2–4
- ATS as favorite
- 0–0–1
- ATS as underdog
- 2–3
- ATS at home
- 1–1–1
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Commanders and Bears in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Commander or a Bear, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Commanders or Bears player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Commanders and Bears players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Commanders and Bears defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2022 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Commanders vs Bears Game FAQ
Who won the 2022 Commanders vs Bears Week 6 game?
The Washington Commanders beat the Chicago Bears 12–7 in Week 6 of the 2022 season. The game was played at Soldier Field in Chicago, IL, on October 13, 2022. See the Commanders' 2022 schedule.
What was the final score of Commanders vs Bears?
The final score was Commanders 12, Bears 7. The Commanders led 3–0 at halftime, and the second half went Commanders 9, Bears 7.
What happened in the Commanders vs Bears game?
Washington led 3–0 at halftime and outscored Chicago 9–7 after the break to win 12–7. Chicago outgained the Commanders 391–214. Justin Fields led all players with 14 of 27 passing for 190 yards and a touchdown, plus 12 carries for 88 rushing yards. The Bears committed 2 turnovers, the Commanders none.
What was the game-winning score in Commanders vs Bears?
Brian Robinson's 1-yard touchdown run with 7:21 left in the fourth quarter gave the Commanders a 12–7 lead they never gave up. It was the final score of the game.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Commanders vs Bears?
Justin Fields led the game with 19.4 PPR fantasy points, the QB8 of Week 6, on 14 of 27 passing for 190 yards and a touchdown, plus 12 carries for 88 rushing yards. Dante Pettis was next with 18.4 (WR10). See Justin Fields's 2022 game log.
Who led Commanders vs Bears in passing, rushing and receiving?
Justin Fields (CHI) led all passers with 14 of 27 for 190 yards, a touchdown and an interception. Justin Fields (CHI) led in rushing with 12 carries for 88 yards. Dante Pettis (CHI) led in receiving with 4 catches for 84 yards and a touchdown.
How many fantasy points did Justin Fields score against the Commanders?
Justin Fields scored 19.4 fantasy points against the Commanders in Week 6 of the 2022 season, the same in PPR, half-PPR and standard scoring because he had no catches, on 14 of 27 passing for 190 yards and a touchdown, plus 12 carries for 88 rushing yards.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Commanders vs Bears?
Dante Pettis outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 18.4 PPR points on 11.7 xFP (+6.7). Carson Wentz fell furthest short, with 4.2 points on 10.6 xFP (−6.4). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
How did the Commanders beat the Bears?
The Commanders beat the Bears 12–7 because they won the turnover battle 2–0. Brian Robinson's 1-yard touchdown run put them ahead for good.
What is the all-time Commanders vs Bears record?
The Commanders lead the all-time series 28–26–1 across 55 meetings since 1932, including a 4–3 record in the postseason.
When did the Commanders and Bears last play before this game?
Before Week 6 of 2022, they last met in the 2019 season on September 23, 2019, when the Bears beat the Commanders 31–15.
Have the Commanders and Bears met in the playoffs?
Yes, 7 times, most recently in the 1987 playoffs. The Commanders are 4–3 against the Bears in the postseason.
What was the closing spread for Commanders vs Bears?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Commanders −1, making the Washington Commanders 1-point favorites, with a closing total of 38.5. That implied about 19.8 points for the Commanders and 18.8 for the Bears.
Did Commanders vs Bears go over or under the total?
The game went under. The consensus closing total was 38.5, and the teams combined for 19 points, 19.5 under the number.
Who covered the spread in Commanders vs Bears?
The Commanders covered by 4 against the closing line of Commanders −1. The final margin was 5 points.