Final2023 Week 16
Soldier Field, Chicago, IL|
Arizona Cardinals vs Chicago Bears, Week 16 2023
Arizona Cardinals
Away
16
Chicago Bears
HomeWon
27
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardinals | 0 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 16 |
| Bears | 7 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 27 |
ARI 16 · CHI 27 Final
Passing leader
ARI · QB
20.4PPR pts
24/38, 230 YDS, 2 TD
Top fantasy scorer
ARI · RB
22.2PPR pts
12 ATT, 45 YDS, 5 REC, 67 REC YDS, 1 REC TD
Cardinals leader
ARI · WR
12.5PPR pts
2 REC, 45 YDS, 1 TD
Defensive playmaker
Jalen Thompson
ARI
1 INT, 5 TKL
Bears 27, Cardinals 16: Chicago beats Arizona
Chicago led 21–7 at halftime after a 14-point second quarter and won 27–16, though Arizona took the second half 9–6. The Bears finished with a 420–306 edge in total offense and averaged 6.3 yards per play.
The Cardinals went 7-for-16 on third down, while the Bears kept the ball for 34:32.
Key advantages
- +1.2 yards/play CHI 6.3 · ARI 5.1
- +114 total yards CHI 420 · ARI 306
- +9% third-down rate CHI 53% · ARI 44%
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Cardinal or Bear on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Bears Won
Chicago won the efficiency, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Cardinals | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 5.1 | Yards per play | 6.3 |
| 306 | Total yards | 420 |
| 44% | Third-down conversion | 53% |
| Other team stats | ||
| 60 | Plays | 67 |
| 0 | Turnovers | 1 |
| 25:28 | Time of possession | 34:32 |
Scoring Summary
The Bears scored three touchdowns and two field goals; the Cardinals scored two touchdowns and one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | ARI | CHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 6:16 | CHI | Justin Fields 3-yard TD run Takes leadCairo Santos XP | 0 | 7 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 12:54 | CHI | Khalil Herbert 11-yard TD run Extends leadCairo Santos XP | 0 | 14 |
| 7:12 | CHI | Justin Fields → Marcedes Lewis, 1-yard TD Extends leadCairo Santos XP | 0 | 21 |
| 2:27 | ARI | Kyler Murray → James Conner, 16-yard TDMatt Prater XP | 7 | 21 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 12:12 | ARI | Matt Prater 55-yard FG | 10 | 21 |
| 1:04 | CHI | Cairo Santos 49-yard FG Extends lead | 10 | 24 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 6:37 | ARI | Kyler Murray → Greg Dortch, 38-yard TD2-pt try failed | 16 | 24 |
| 1:02 | CHI | Cairo Santos 29-yard FG Extends lead | 16 | 27 |
Fantasy Points: Cardinals vs Bears, Week 16 2023
Fantasy leaders
- Justin FieldsCHI · QB25.5 PTSQB4
- James ConnerARI · RB22.2 PTSRB4
- Kyler MurrayARI · QB20.4 PTSQB12
- Khalil HerbertCHI · RB19.1 PTSRB11
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.4 | QB12 | 24/38 | 230 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 32 | 0 | 97.5 | Start/Sit → | |
| 25.5 | QB4 | 15/27 | 170 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 97 | 1 | 71.5 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.2 | RB4 | RB | 12 | 45 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 67 | 1 | ||
| 19.1 | RB11 | RB | 20 | 112 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 14.7 | TE6 | TE | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 107 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 12.5 | WR31 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 2 | 45 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 12.0 | RB22 | RB | 2 | 10 | 0 | 8 | 7 | 40 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.1 | TE21 | TE | — | — | — | 8 | 6 | 31 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.3 | RB40 | RB | 9 | 37 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.1 | TE28 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 5.6 | WR72 | WR | 1 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 30 | 0 | ||
| 4.8 | WR77 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 3 | 18 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.7 | TE41 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 17 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.5 | WR94 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 5 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.4 | TE47 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.4 | WR123 | WR | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | RB | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Arizona Cardinals
Snap Share
Trey McBrideTE59 snaps97%
Michael WilsonWR55 snaps90%
Rondale MooreWR50 snaps82%
Greg DortchWR48 snaps79%
James ConnerRB36 snaps59%
Target Share37 targets
- Trey McBride22%, 8 targets
- Emari Demercado22%, 8 targets
- James Conner14%, 5 targets
- Greg Dortch14%, 5 targets
- Michael Wilson11%, 4 targets
- Other19%, 7 targets
Carry Share20 carries
- James Conner60%, 12 carries
- Kyler Murray25%, 5 carries
- Emari Demercado10%, 2 carries
- Rondale Moore5%, 1 carries
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Darnell MooneyWR57 snaps81%
DJ MooreWR52 snaps74%
Khalil HerbertRB36 snaps51%
Marcedes LewisTE35 snaps50%
Roschon JohnsonRB32 snaps46%
Target Share23 targets
- DJ Moore26%, 6 targets
- Cole Kmet22%, 5 targets
- Darnell Mooney17%, 4 targets
- Roschon Johnson13%, 3 targets
- Khalil Herbert9%, 2 targets
- Other13%, 3 targets
Carry Share39 carries
- Khalil Herbert51%, 20 carries
- Justin Fields23%, 9 carries
- Roschon Johnson23%, 9 carries
- Velus Jones3%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 59 | 97% | 8 | 22% | 0 | |
| 55 | 90% | 4 | 11% | 0 | |
| 50 | 82% | 3 | 8% | 1 | |
| 57 | 81% | 4 | 17% | 0 | |
| 48 | 79% | 5 | 14% | 0 | |
| 52 | 74% | 6 | 26% | 0 | |
| 36 | 59% | 5 | 14% | 12 | |
| 36 | 51% | 2 | 9% | 20 | |
| 35 | 50% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 32 | 46% | 3 | 13% | 9 | |
| 31 | 44% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 30 | 43% | 5 | 22% | 0 | |
| 29 | 41% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 23 | 38% | 8 | 22% | 2 | |
| 17 | 28% | 3 | 8% | 0 | |
| 13 | 19% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 13 | 19% | 1 | 4% | 1 | |
| 9 | 15% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 4 | 6% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 2 | 3% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 2 | 3% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+8.6Justin Fields25.5 PTS vs 16.9 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−6.7Michael Wilson0.0 PTS vs 6.7 xFP
- Highest expected volume19.1 xFPKyler Murray20.4 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyler MurrayARI · QB | 20.4 | 19.1 | +1.3 | 100% | 38 att | — | 38 | 5 | 25% | 0 | 0% |
| Justin FieldsCHI · QB | 25.5 | 16.9 | +8.6 | 100% | 27 att | — | 27 | 9 | 23% | 0 | 0% |
| James ConnerARI · RB | 22.2 | 15.7 | +6.5 | 59% | 60% car | — | 0 | 12 | 60% | 5 | 14% |
| Khalil HerbertCHI · RB | 19.1 | 15.6 | +3.5 | 51% | 51% car | — | 0 | 20 | 51% | 2 | 9% |
| Emari DemercadoARI · RB | 12.0 | 14.6 | −2.6 | 38% | 22% tgt | — | 0 | 2 | 10% | 8 | 22% |
| Trey McBrideARI · TE | 9.1 | 13.4 | −4.3 | 97% | 22% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 22% |
| Roschon JohnsonCHI · RB | 8.3 | 10.5 | −2.2 | 46% | 23% car | — | 0 | 9 | 23% | 3 | 13% |
| DJ MooreCHI · WR | 4.8 | 10.0 | −5.2 | 74% | 26% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 26% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 14.7 | 8.3 | +6.4 | 43% | 22% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 22% |
| Greg DortchARI · WR | 12.5 | 8.3 | +4.2 | 79% | 14% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 14% |
| Darnell MooneyCHI · WR | 2.5 | 6.7 | −4.2 | 81% | 17% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 17% |
| Michael WilsonARI · WR | 0.0 | 6.7 | −6.7 | 90% | 11% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 11% |
| Rondale MooreARI · WR | 5.6 | 5.6 | 0.0 | 82% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 5% | 3 | 8% |
| Elijah HigginsARI · TE | 3.7 | 5.0 | −1.3 | 28% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 8% |
| Velus Jones Jr.CHI · WR | 0.4 | 2.3 | −1.9 | 19% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 1 | 4% |
| Marcedes LewisCHI · TE | 7.1 | 1.7 | +5.4 | 50% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Michael CarterARI · RB | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 3% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Robert TonyanCHI · TE | 2.4 | 1.7 | +0.7 | 44% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
Team totals: Cardinals 37 targets and 20 carries; Bears 23 targets and 39 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2023 season: 1.67 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.61 per carry and 0.42 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Kyler Murray
ARI · QB · 20.4 pts on 19.1 expected
24 of 38 passing for 230 yards, 2 touchdowns; 5 carries for 32 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 19.1 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 18.3, 22.7, 20.4, 11.8, 15.3, 20.4
W10W11W12W13W15W16
Justin Fields Ran hot
CHI · QB · 25.5 pts on 16.9 expected
15 of 27 passing for 170 yards, 1 touchdown, 1 interception; 9 carries for 97 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 16.9 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 5.9, 21.2, 10.6, 24.7, 11.6, 25.5
W6W11W12W14W15W16
Best score since Week 5.
James Conner Ran hot
ARI · RB · 22.2 pts on 15.7 expected
5 targets (14% of the team's), 5 catches for 67 yards and 1 touchdown; 12 carries (60% of the team's) for 45 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 15.7 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 7.3, 8.3, 7.2, 22.5, 17.9, 22.2
W10W11W12W13W15W16
Emari Demercado
ARI · RB · 12.0 pts on 14.6 expected
8 targets (22% of the team's), 7 catches for 40 yards; 2 carries (10% of the team's) for 10 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 14.6 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 11.5, 8.9, 1.5, 0.0, 14.0, 12.0
W7W8W12W13W15W16
Season high in targets (8).
Khalil Herbert
CHI · RB · 19.1 pts on 15.6 expected
2 targets (9% of the team's), 1 catch for 9 yards; 20 carries (51% of the team's) for 112 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 15.6 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 7.6, 6.1, 5.8, 0.8, 2.2, 19.1
W5W11W12W14W15W16
Season high in carries (20). Best score since Week 4.
Roschon Johnson
CHI · RB · 8.3 pts on 10.5 expected
3 targets (13% of the team's), 3 catches for 16 yards; 9 carries (23% of the team's) for 37 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 10.5 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 7.2, 3.0, 12.5, 0.6, 10.0, 8.3
W10W11W12W14W15W16
DJ Moore Unlucky
CHI · WR · 4.8 pts on 10.0 expected
6 targets (26% of the team's), 3 catches for 18 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 10.0 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 10.9, 22.6, 22.4, 26.8, 9.2, 4.8
W10W11W12W14W15W16
Fewest points since Week 1.
Cole Kmet Ran hot
CHI · TE · 14.7 pts on 8.3 expected
5 targets (22% of the team's), 4 catches for 107 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 8.3 points; efficiency supplied the rest.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 9.6, 5.0, 11.3, 11.6, 13.3, 14.7
W10W11W12W14W15W16
Best score since Week 9.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Arizona Cardinals
- ▲Stock up: Trey McBride played 97% of the snaps, up from a 64% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Greg Dortch played 79% of the snaps, up from a 36% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Rondale Moore played 82% of the snaps, up from a 67% season average.
Chicago Bears
- ▲Stock up: Marcedes Lewis played 50% of the snaps, up from a 26% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Robert Tonyan played 44% of the snaps, up from a 24% season average.
- ▼Stock down: DJ Moore played 74% of the snaps, down from a 92% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2023 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Cardinals D | Bears D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 19.4 | 16.9 |
| RBs | 26.2 | 23.8 |
| WRs | 32.5 | 31.9 |
| TEs | 11.2 | 13.7 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Chicago opened at 50% win probability and passed 98% before halftime on the way to the win.
Bears win probability
Key Swings
- +21Fields 3-yd TD run50% → 71%Q1 6:16
- +16Herbert 11-yd TD run73% → 89%Q2 12:54
- +7Fields → Lewis, 1-yd TD91% → 98%Q2 7:12
- −6Murray → Conner, 16-yd TD98% → 92%Q2 2:27
- −5Prater 55-yd FG94% → 89%Q3 12:12
Swing in Bears win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Arizona Cardinals | Measure | Chicago Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 60 | Plays | 67 |
| 67% | Pass rate | 42% |
| 5.3 | Yds / dropback | 6.1 |
| 4.7 | Yds / carry | 6.4 |
| 7/16 | Third downs | 8/15 |
Efficiency edge Chicago ran 7 more plays and gained 0.8 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- ARI Demercado 22% · McBride 22% · Dortch 14%
- CHI Moore 26% · Kmet 22% · Mooney 17%
Possession Results
| Result | ARI | CHI |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 2 | 3 |
| Field goals | 1 | 2 |
| Punts | 6 | 5 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 1 |
| Turnovers on downs | 1 | 0 |
ARI turnover edge: +1
- The Bears opened the scoring on their second possession, a 6-play, 74-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
- The Bears scored touchdowns on two of their first three drives, then drained the clock with two second-half drives of four to six minutes.
All 23 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 4 | 21 | 1:46 | Punt |
| ARI | Q1 13:14 | 6 | 13 | 4:02 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 9:12 | 6 | 74 | 2:56 | Touchdown |
| ARI | Q1 6:16 | 6 | 25 | 2:25 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 3:51 | 11 | 90 | 5:57 | Touchdown |
| ARI | Q2 12:54 | 3 | -7 | 1:01 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 11:53 | 8 | 54 | 4:41 | Touchdown |
| ARI | Q2 7:12 | 9 | 75 | 4:45 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 2:27 | 3 | 1 | 0:49 | Punt |
| ARI | Q2 1:38 | 3 | -1 | 0:39 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 0:59 | 3 | 0 | 0:42 | Punt |
| ARI | Q2 0:17 | 3 | 29 | 0:17 | End of half |
| ARI | Q3 15:00 | 5 | 20 | 2:48 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q3 12:12 | 6 | 13 | 3:24 | Punt |
| ARI | Q3 8:48 | 3 | 0 | 2:09 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 6:39 | 10 | 49 | 5:35 | Field goal |
| ARI | Q3 1:04 | 3 | 1 | 1:11 | Punt |
| CHI | Q4 14:53 | 8 | 66 | 4:31 | Interception |
| ARI | Q4 10:22 | 8 | 80 | 3:45 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q4 6:37 | 3 | 9 | 2:16 | Punt |
| ARI | Q4 4:21 | 7 | 18 | 1:24 | Downs |
| CHI | Q4 2:57 | 7 | 16 | 1:55 | Field goal |
| ARI | Q4 1:02 | 5 | 45 | 1:02 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Cardinals vs Bears Head-to-Head
The Cardinals and Bears first met in 1920 and have played 94 times since.
- All-time series
- 58–30–6Bears lead, 94 meetings since 1920
- Postseason
- 0No playoff meetings
- Largest Cardinals win
- 53–141955
- Largest Bears win
- 53–71941
Since 2021
2–1 Cardinals lead
3 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- C
- B
- C
Oldest to newest. C = Cardinals win, B = Bears win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2024 Wk 9 Bears at Cardinals, 2024 Wk 9 recap ARI 29 CHI 9 ARI W
- 2023 Wk 16 Cardinals at Bears CHI 27 ARI 16 CHI W
- 2021 Wk 13 Cardinals at Bears, 2021 Wk 13 recap ARI 33 CHI 22 ARI W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2023 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Cardinals | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 4-13 | Record | 7-10 |
| 19.4 | Points per game | 21.2 |
| 324.1 | Yards per game | 323.2 |
| 5.2 | Yards per play | 5.0 |
| 26.8 | Points allowed per game | 22.3 |
| 355.7 | Yards allowed per game | 324.2 |
Cardinals and Bears in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Cardinal or a Bear, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Cardinals or Bears player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Cardinals and Bears players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Cardinals and Bears defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2023 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Cardinals vs Bears Game FAQ
Who won the 2023 Cardinals vs Bears Week 16 game?
The Chicago Bears beat the Arizona Cardinals 27–16 in Week 16 of the 2023 season. The game was played at Soldier Field in Chicago, IL, on December 24, 2023. See the Bears' 2023 schedule.
What was the final score of Cardinals vs Bears?
The final score was Bears 27, Cardinals 16. The Bears led 21–7 at halftime, and the second half went Cardinals 9, Bears 6.
What happened in the Cardinals vs Bears game?
Chicago led 21–7 at halftime after a 14-point second quarter and won 27–16, though Arizona took the second half 9–6. The Bears finished with a 420–306 edge in total offense and averaged 6.3 yards per play. Justin Fields led all players with 15 of 27 passing for 170 yards and a touchdown, plus 9 carries for 97 rushing yards and a touchdown. The Bears committed 1 turnover, the Cardinals none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Cardinals vs Bears?
Justin Fields led the game with 25.5 PPR fantasy points, the QB4 of Week 16, on 15 of 27 passing for 170 yards and a touchdown, plus 9 carries for 97 rushing yards and a touchdown. James Conner was next with 22.2 (RB4). See Justin Fields's 2023 game log.
Who led Cardinals vs Bears in passing, rushing and receiving?
Kyler Murray (ARI) led all passers with 24 of 38 for 230 yards and 2 touchdowns. Khalil Herbert (CHI) led in rushing with 20 carries for 112 yards and a touchdown. Cole Kmet (CHI) led in receiving with 4 catches for 107 yards.
How many fantasy points did Justin Fields score against the Cardinals?
Justin Fields scored 25.5 fantasy points against the Cardinals in Week 16 of the 2023 season, the same in PPR, half-PPR and standard scoring because he had no catches, on 15 of 27 passing for 170 yards and a touchdown, plus 9 carries for 97 rushing yards and a touchdown.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Cardinals vs Bears?
Justin Fields outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 25.5 PPR points on 16.9 xFP (+8.6). Michael Wilson fell furthest short, with 0.0 points on 6.7 xFP (−6.7). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Cardinals vs Bears?
Kyler Murray had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 19.1 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 20.4. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Bears beat the Cardinals?
The Bears beat the Cardinals 27–16 because they averaged 6.3 yards per play to 5.1 and outgained them 420–306.
Which team won the turnover battle in Cardinals vs Bears?
The Cardinals won the turnover battle 1–0: the Bears gave the ball away 1 time and the Cardinals not at all. The Bears won the game anyway.
What is the all-time Cardinals vs Bears record?
The Bears lead the all-time series 58–30–6 across 94 meetings since 1920.
When did the Cardinals and Bears last play before this game?
Before Week 16 of 2023, they last met in the 2021 season on December 5, 2021, when the Cardinals beat the Bears 33–22.
What is the Cardinals vs Bears record since 2021?
The Cardinals lead 2–1 across 3 meetings since the 2021 season, including this game.
