Final2024 Week 9
State Farm Stadium, Glendale, AZ|
Chicago Bears vs Arizona Cardinals, Week 9 2024
Chicago Bears
Away
9
Arizona Cardinals
HomeWon
29
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bears | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| Cardinals | 7 | 14 | 3 | 5 | 29 |
CHI 9 · ARI 29 Final
Passing leader
CHI · QB
9.2PPR pts
22/41, 217 YDS
Top fantasy scorer
ARI · RB
16.0PPR pts
4 ATT, 59 YDS, 1 TD, 2 REC, 21 REC YDS
Bears leader
CHI · WR
15.4PPR pts
5 REC, 104 YDS
Defensive playmaker
Zaven Collins
ARI
2 SACK, 6 TKL
Cardinals 29, Bears 9: Arizona leads from start to finish
Arizona led 21–9 at halftime after a 14-point second quarter and outscored Chicago 8–0 after the break to win 29–9. The Cardinals finished with a 350–241 edge in total offense and averaged 6.1 yards per play.
The Bears went 3-for-14 on third down.
Key advantages
- +2.7 yards/play ARI 6.1 · CHI 3.4
- +109 total yards ARI 350 · CHI 241
- +17% third-down rate ARI 38% · CHI 21%
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Bear or Cardinal on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Cardinals Won
Arizona won the efficiency and third-down battles.
| Bears | Stat | Cardinals |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4 | Yards per play | 6.1 |
| 241 | Total yards | 350 |
| 21% | Third-down conversion | 38% |
| Other team stats | ||
| 70 | Plays | 57 |
| 0 | Turnovers | 2 |
| 31:01 | Time of possession | 28:59 |
Scoring Summary
The Cardinals scored three touchdowns, two field goals, and one safety; the Bears scored three field goals.
| Time | Team | Play | CHI | ARI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 0:46 | ARI | Trey McBride 2-yard TD run Takes leadChad Ryland XP | 0 | 7 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 11:51 | CHI | Cairo Santos 29-yard FG | 3 | 7 |
| 9:10 | CHI | Cairo Santos 53-yard FG | 6 | 7 |
| 3:14 | ARI | Trey Benson 1-yard TD run Extends leadChad Ryland XP | 6 | 14 |
| 0:26 | CHI | Cairo Santos 53-yard FG | 9 | 14 |
| 0:04 | ARI | Emari Demercado 53-yard TD run Extends leadChad Ryland XP | 9 | 21 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 4:53 | ARI | Chad Ryland 29-yard FG Extends lead | 9 | 24 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 14:02 | ARI | Chad Ryland 55-yard FG Extends lead | 9 | 27 |
| 7:54 | ARI | Safety Extends lead | 9 | 29 |
Fantasy Points: Bears vs Cardinals, Week 9 2024
Fantasy leaders
- Emari DemercadoARI · RB16.0 PTSRB16
- Rome OdunzeCHI · WR15.4 PTSWR22
- James ConnerARI · RB14.9 PTSRB17
- D'Andre SwiftCHI · RB14.2 PTSRB19
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.2 | QB28 | 22/41 | 217 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 68.9 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.8 | QB30 | 13/20 | 154 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 88.3 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16.0 | RB16 | RB | 4 | 59 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 21 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 15.4 | WR22 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 5 | 104 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 14.9 | RB17 | RB | 18 | 107 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 0 | ||
| 14.2 | RB19 | RB | 16 | 51 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 31 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 12.7 | TE9 | TE | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 35 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 12.5 | RB25 | RB | 8 | 37 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 0 | ||
| 7.6 | WR47 | WR | — | — | — | 10 | 4 | 36 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.3 | WR49 | WR | — | — | — | 9 | 4 | 33 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.4 | TE28 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 34 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.1 | RB48 | RB | 3 | 13 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.4 | WR77 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 2 | 34 | 0 | ||
| 1.5 | TE45 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | ||
| 0.2 | RB71 | RB | 1 | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
DJ MooreWR73 snaps99%
Keenan AllenWR69 snaps93%
Rome OdunzeWR65 snaps88%
Cole KmetTE63 snaps85%
D'Andre SwiftRB46 snaps62%
Target Share36 targets
- Keenan Allen28%, 10 targets
- DJ Moore25%, 9 targets
- Rome Odunze19%, 7 targets
- D'Andre Swift17%, 6 targets
- Roschon Johnson8%, 3 targets
- Other3%, 1 targets
Carry Share23 carries
- D'Andre Swift70%, 16 carries
- Caleb Williams17%, 4 carries
- Roschon Johnson13%, 3 carries
Arizona Cardinals
Snap Share
Trey McBrideTE52 snaps90%
Marvin HarrisonWR43 snaps74%
Michael WilsonWR41 snaps71%
Tip ReimanTE29 snaps50%
James ConnerRB28 snaps48%
Target Share19 targets
- Marvin Harrison26%, 5 targets
- Trey McBride21%, 4 targets
- James Conner16%, 3 targets
- Elijah Higgins11%, 2 targets
- Emari Demercado11%, 2 targets
- Other16%, 3 targets
Carry Share34 carries
- James Conner53%, 18 carries
- Trey Benson24%, 8 carries
- Emari Demercado12%, 4 carries
- Kyler Murray6%, 2 carries
- DeeJay Dallas3%, 1 carries
- Other3%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 73 | 99% | 9 | 25% | 0 | |
| 69 | 93% | 10 | 28% | 0 | |
| 52 | 90% | 4 | 21% | 1 | |
| 65 | 88% | 7 | 19% | 0 | |
| 63 | 85% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 43 | 74% | 5 | 26% | 0 | |
| 41 | 71% | 1 | 5% | 0 | |
| 46 | 62% | 6 | 17% | 16 | |
| 29 | 50% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 28 | 48% | 3 | 16% | 18 | |
| 25 | 43% | 2 | 11% | 0 | |
| 22 | 38% | 1 | 5% | 0 | |
| 28 | 38% | 3 | 8% | 3 | |
| 16 | 28% | 1 | 5% | 8 | |
| 14 | 24% | 2 | 11% | 4 | |
| 15 | 20% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 11 | 19% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 10 | 14% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 3 | 5% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 1 | |
| 1 | 1% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+10.0Emari Demercado16.0 PTS vs 6.0 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−11.6Caleb Williams9.2 PTS vs 20.8 xFP
- Highest expected volume20.8 xFPCaleb Williams9.2 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caleb WilliamsCHI · QB | 9.2 | 20.8 | −11.6 | 100% | 41 att | — | 41 | 4 | 17% | 0 | 0% |
| D'Andre SwiftCHI · RB | 14.2 | 20.7 | −6.5 | 62% | 70% car | — | 0 | 16 | 70% | 6 | 17% |
| Keenan AllenCHI · WR | 7.6 | 17.1 | −9.5 | 93% | 28% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 10 | 28% |
| James ConnerARI · RB | 14.9 | 16.9 | −2.0 | 48% | 53% car | — | 0 | 18 | 53% | 3 | 16% |
| DJ MooreCHI · WR | 7.3 | 15.4 | −8.1 | 99% | 25% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 9 | 25% |
| Rome OdunzeCHI · WR | 15.4 | 12.0 | +3.4 | 88% | 19% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 19% |
| Kyler MurrayARI · QB | 4.8 | 10.2 | −5.4 | 95% | 20 att | — | 20 | 2 | 6% | 0 | 0% |
| Marvin Harrison Jr.ARI · WR | 3.4 | 8.6 | −5.2 | 74% | 26% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 26% |
| Trey McBrideARI · TE | 12.7 | 7.5 | +5.2 | 90% | 21% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 4 | 21% |
| Roschon JohnsonCHI · RB | 4.1 | 7.1 | −3.0 | 38% | 13% car | — | 0 | 3 | 13% | 3 | 8% |
| Trey BensonARI · RB | 12.5 | 6.9 | +5.6 | 28% | 24% car | — | 0 | 8 | 24% | 1 | 5% |
| Emari DemercadoARI · RB | 16.0 | 6.0 | +10.0 | 24% | 12% car | — | 0 | 4 | 12% | 2 | 11% |
| Elijah HigginsARI · TE | 5.4 | 3.4 | +2.0 | 43% | 11% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 11% |
| Gerald EverettCHI · TE | 1.5 | 1.7 | −0.2 | 20% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Greg DortchARI · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 38% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 5% |
| Michael WilsonARI · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 71% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 5% |
| DeeJay DallasARI · RB | 0.2 | 0.7 | −0.5 | 2% | 3% car | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Bears 36 targets and 23 carries; Cardinals 19 targets and 34 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2024 season: 1.71 PPR points per target (68% catch rate), 0.65 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Caleb Williams Unlucky
CHI · QB · 9.2 pts on 20.8 expected
22 of 41 passing for 217 yards; 4 carries for 5 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 20.8 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 19.3, 11.5, 23.6, 29.6, 9.9, 9.2
W3W4W5W6W8W9
Fewest points since Week 1.
Kyler Murray Unlucky
ARI · QB · 4.8 pts on 10.2 expected
13 of 20 passing for 154 yards; 2 carries for 6 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 10.2 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 10.0, 25.1, 12.0, 21.2, 22.2, 4.8
W4W5W6W7W8W9
Lowest-scoring game of the season.
D'Andre Swift Volume, no payoff
CHI · RB · 14.2 pts on 20.7 expected
6 targets (17% of the team's), 6 catches for 31 yards; 16 carries (70% of the team's) for 51 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 20.7 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 6.2, 29.5, 20.0, 21.9, 18.9, 14.2
W3W4W5W6W8W9
Fewest points since Week 3.
Keenan Allen Unlucky
CHI · WR · 7.6 pts on 17.1 expected
10 targets (28% of the team's), 4 catches for 36 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 17.1 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 6.9, 4.9, 6.3, 21.1, 5.9, 7.6
W1W4W5W6W8W9
James Conner
ARI · RB · 14.9 pts on 16.9 expected
3 targets (16% of the team's), 3 catches for 12 yards; 18 carries (53% of the team's) for 107 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 16.9 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 18.3, 14.0, 6.6, 18.2, 14.9, 14.9
W4W5W6W7W8W9
Marvin Harrison Jr. Unlucky
ARI · WR · 3.4 pts on 8.6 expected
5 targets (26% of the team's), 2 catches for 34 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 8.6 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 15.5, 5.6, 0.0, 5.1, 23.1, 3.4
W4W5W6W7W8W9
DJ Moore Unlucky
CHI · WR · 7.3 pts on 15.4 expected
9 targets (25% of the team's), 4 catches for 33 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 15.4 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 15.2, 11.2, 27.5, 6.0, 5.4, 7.3
W3W4W5W6W8W9
Trey McBride Ran hot
ARI · TE · 12.7 pts on 7.5 expected
4 targets (21% of the team's), 3 catches for 35 yards; 1 carry (3% of the team's) for 2 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 7.5 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 5.5, 11.3, 17.6, 10.1, 21.4, 12.7
W3W5W6W7W8W9
Stock Up, Stock Down
Chicago Bears
- ▼Stock down: Gerald Everett played 20% of the snaps, down from a 36% season average.
Arizona Cardinals
- ▼Stock down: James Conner played 48% of the snaps, down from a 67% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2024 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Bears D | Cardinals D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 13.8 | 16.9 |
| RBs | 25.2 | 23.6 |
| WRs | 28.9 | 32.4 |
| TEs | 12.3 | 9.7 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Arizona opened at 50% win probability and passed 98% in the third quarter on the way to the win.
Cardinals win probability
Key Swings
- +22McBride 2-yd TD run50% → 72%Q1 0:46
- −11Santos 53-yd FG64% → 54%Q2 9:10
- +25Benson 1-yd TD run54% → 79%Q2 3:14
- −10Santos 53-yd FG80% → 70%Q2 0:26
- +20Demercado 53-yd TD run70% → 90%Q2 0:04
Swing in Cardinals win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Chicago Bears | Measure | Arizona Cardinals |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Plays | 57 |
| 67% | Pass rate | 40% |
| 3.7 | Yds / dropback | 6.0 |
| 3.0 | Yds / carry | 6.3 |
| 3/14 | Third downs | 5/13 |
Efficiency edge Arizona ran 13 fewer plays but gained 2.3 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- CHI Allen 28% · Moore 25% · Odunze 19%
- ARI Harrison 26% · McBride 21% · Conner 16%
Possession Results
| Result | CHI | ARI |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 0 | 3 |
| Field goals | 3 | 2 |
| Punts | 4 | 4 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 2 |
| Turnovers on downs | 2 | 0 |
| Safeties | 1 | 0 |
CHI turnover edge: +2
- The Cardinals opened the scoring on their third possession, a 5-play, 41-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
All 23 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARI | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 4 | 1:30 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 13:30 | 10 | 30 | 6:21 | Punt |
| ARI | Q1 7:09 | 4 | 19 | 2:45 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 4:24 | 3 | 2 | 1:01 | Punt |
| ARI | Q1 3:23 | 5 | 41 | 2:37 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q1 0:46 | 11 | 69 | 3:55 | Field goal |
| ARI | Q2 11:51 | 2 | 23 | 0:49 | Fumble |
| CHI | Q2 11:02 | 6 | 11 | 1:52 | Field goal |
| ARI | Q2 9:10 | 12 | 70 | 5:56 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 3:14 | 10 | 35 | 2:48 | Field goal |
| ARI | Q2 0:26 | 4 | 70 | 0:22 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 0:04 | 1 | -1 | 0:04 | End of half |
| CHI | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 5 | 2:13 | Punt |
| ARI | Q3 12:47 | 13 | 69 | 7:54 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q3 4:53 | 10 | 10 | 4:58 | Downs |
| ARI | Q4 14:55 | 4 | 3 | 0:53 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q4 14:02 | 3 | -3 | 2:11 | Punt |
| ARI | Q4 11:51 | 5 | 34 | 3:30 | Punt |
| CHI | Q4 8:21 | 1 | -1 | 0:27 | Safety |
| ARI | Q4 7:54 | 4 | 9 | 0:23 | Fumble |
| CHI | Q4 7:31 | 9 | 34 | 2:56 | Downs |
| ARI | Q4 4:35 | 3 | 5 | 2:20 | Punt |
| CHI | Q4 2:15 | 6 | 29 | 2:15 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Bears vs Cardinals Head-to-Head
The Bears and Cardinals first met in 1920 and have played 94 times since.
- All-time series
- 58–30–6Bears lead, 94 meetings since 1920
- Postseason
- 0No playoff meetings
- Largest Bears win
- 53–71941
- Largest Cardinals win
- 53–141955
Since 2021
2–1 Cardinals lead
3 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- C
- B
- C
Oldest to newest. C = Cardinals win, B = Bears win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2024 Wk 9 Bears at Cardinals ARI 29 CHI 9 ARI W
- 2023 Wk 16 Cardinals at Bears, 2023 Wk 16 recap CHI 27 ARI 16 CHI W
- 2021 Wk 13 Cardinals at Bears, 2021 Wk 13 recap ARI 33 CHI 22 ARI W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2024 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Bears | Stat | Cardinals |
|---|---|---|
| 5-12 | Record | 8-9 |
| 18.2 | Points per game | 23.5 |
| 283.5 | Yards per game | 358.2 |
| 4.5 | Yards per play | 5.9 |
| 21.8 | Points allowed per game | 22.3 |
| 354.2 | Yards allowed per game | 342.5 |
Bears and Cardinals in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Bear or a Cardinal, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Bears or Cardinals player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Bears and Cardinals players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Bears and Cardinals defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2024 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Bears vs Cardinals Game FAQ
Who won the 2024 Bears vs Cardinals Week 9 game?
The Arizona Cardinals beat the Chicago Bears 29–9 in Week 9 of the 2024 season. The game was played at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, AZ, on November 3, 2024. See the Cardinals' 2024 schedule.
What was the final score of Bears vs Cardinals?
The final score was Cardinals 29, Bears 9. The Cardinals led 21–9 at halftime, and the second half went Bears 0, Cardinals 8.
What happened in the Bears vs Cardinals game?
Arizona led 21–9 at halftime after a 14-point second quarter and outscored Chicago 8–0 after the break to win 29–9. The Cardinals finished with a 350–241 edge in total offense and averaged 6.1 yards per play. Emari Demercado led all players with 2 catches for 21 yards, plus 4 carries for 59 rushing yards and a touchdown. The Cardinals committed 2 turnovers, the Bears none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Bears vs Cardinals?
Emari Demercado led the game with 16.0 PPR fantasy points, the RB16 of Week 9, on 2 catches for 21 yards, plus 4 carries for 59 rushing yards and a touchdown. Rome Odunze was next with 15.4 (WR22). See Emari Demercado's 2024 game log.
Who led Bears vs Cardinals in passing, rushing and receiving?
Caleb Williams (CHI) led all passers with 22 of 41 for 217 yards. James Conner (ARI) led in rushing with 18 carries for 107 yards. Rome Odunze (CHI) led in receiving with 5 catches for 104 yards.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Bears vs Cardinals?
Emari Demercado outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 16.0 PPR points on 6.0 xFP (+10.0). Caleb Williams fell furthest short, with 9.2 points on 20.8 xFP (−11.6). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Bears vs Cardinals?
Caleb Williams had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 20.8 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 9.2. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Cardinals beat the Bears?
The Cardinals beat the Bears 29–9 because they averaged 6.1 yards per play to 3.4 and outgained them 350–241.
Which team won the turnover battle in Bears vs Cardinals?
The Bears won the turnover battle 2–0: the Cardinals gave the ball away 2 times and the Bears not at all. The Cardinals won the game anyway.
What is the all-time Bears vs Cardinals record?
The Bears lead the all-time series 58–30–6 across 94 meetings since 1920.
When did the Bears and Cardinals last play before this game?
Before Week 9 of 2024, they last met in the 2023 season on December 24, 2023, when the Bears beat the Cardinals 27–16.
What is the Bears vs Cardinals record since 2021?
The Cardinals lead 2–1 across 3 meetings since the 2021 season, including this game.
