Final2023 Week 6
SoFi Stadium, Inglewood, CA|
Arizona Cardinals vs Los Angeles Rams, Week 6 2023
Arizona Cardinals
Away
9
Los Angeles Rams
HomeWon
26
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardinals | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| Rams | 3 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 26 |
ARI 9 · LAR 26 Final
Passing leader
ARI · QB
11.1PPR pts
21/41, 235 YDS, 1 INT
Top fantasy scorer
LAR · WR
27.8PPR pts
7 REC, 148 YDS, 1 TD
Cardinals leader
ARI · TE
10.2PPR pts
4 REC, 62 YDS
Defensive playmaker
Christian Rozeboom
LAR
1 INT, 3 TKL
Rams 26, Cardinals 9: Los Angeles rallies from 3 down at halftime
Los Angeles erased a 9–6 halftime deficit, outscoring Arizona 20–0 after the break to win 26–9. The Rams finished with a 382–345 edge in total offense and averaged 6.9 yards per play.
The Cardinals went 6-for-16 on third down and committed two turnovers.
The two teams meet again in Week 6 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +2.2 yards/play LAR 6.9 · ARI 4.7
- +1 turnover margin LAR 1 · ARI 2 turnovers
- +37 total yards LAR 382 · ARI 345
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Cardinal or Ram on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Rams Won
Los Angeles won the efficiency and turnover battles.
| Cardinals | Stat | Rams |
|---|---|---|
| 4.7 | Yards per play | 6.9 |
| 2 | Turnovers | 1 |
| 345 | Total yards | 382 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 73 | Plays | 55 |
| 38% | Third-down conversion | 33% |
| 30:30 | Time of possession | 29:30 |
Scoring Summary
The Rams scored two touchdowns and four field goals; the Cardinals scored three field goals.
| Time | Team | Play | ARI | LAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 11:25 | ARI | Matt Prater 55-yard FG Takes lead | 3 | 0 |
| 0:11 | LAR | Brett Maher 29-yard FG Ties game | 3 | 3 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 12:35 | ARI | Matt Prater 32-yard FG Takes lead | 6 | 3 |
| 0:43 | ARI | Matt Prater 27-yard FG Extends lead | 9 | 3 |
| 0:04 | LAR | Brett Maher 35-yard FG | 9 | 6 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 8:57 | LAR | Matthew Stafford → Cooper Kupp, 13-yard TD Takes leadBrett Maher XP | 9 | 13 |
| 2:44 | LAR | Brett Maher 25-yard FG Extends lead | 9 | 16 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 8:19 | LAR | Kyren Williams 5-yard TD run Extends leadBrett Maher XP | 9 | 23 |
| 4:37 | LAR | Brett Maher 43-yard FG Extends lead | 9 | 26 |
Fantasy Points: Cardinals vs Rams, Week 6 2023
Fantasy leaders
- Cooper KuppLAR · WR27.8 PTSWR4
- Kyren WilliamsLAR · RB21.8 PTSRB3
- Matthew StaffordLAR · QB13.2 PTSQB15
- Joshua DobbsARI · QB11.1 PTSQB19
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.1 | QB19 | 21/41 | 235 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 47 | 0 | 58.5 | Start/Sit → | |
| 13.2 | QB15 | 15/24 | 226 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 107.3 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27.8 | WR4 | WR | — | — | — | 9 | 7 | 148 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 21.8 | RB3 | RB | 20 | 158 | 1 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 10.2 | TE12 | TE | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 62 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.2 | WR42 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 62 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.4 | WR49 | WR | — | — | — | 11 | 4 | 34 | 0 | ||
| 7.1 | RB34 | RB | 10 | 40 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | ||
| 6.6 | WR57 | WR | 3 | -4 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 30 | 0 | ||
| 6.6 | WR58 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 4 | 26 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.4 | RB40 | RB | 8 | 36 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | ||
| 4.2 | TE25 | TE | — | — | — | 5 | 2 | 22 | 0 | ||
| 4.0 | WR79 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 30 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.8 | TE28 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 18 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.7 | RB52 | RB | 2 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.3 | RB59 | RB | 3 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | ||
| 1.0 | RB72 | RB | 4 | 10 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Arizona Cardinals
Snap Share
Marquise BrownWR68 snaps89%
Michael WilsonWR67 snaps88%
Rondale MooreWR50 snaps66%
Trey McBrideTE44 snaps58%
Zach ErtzTE35 snaps46%
Target Share38 targets
- Marquise Brown29%, 11 targets
- Rondale Moore18%, 7 targets
- Zach Ertz13%, 5 targets
- Trey McBride13%, 5 targets
- Michael Wilson11%, 4 targets
- Other16%, 6 targets
Carry Share30 carries
- Keaontay Ingram33%, 10 carries
- Damien Williams27%, 8 carries
- Joshua Dobbs23%, 7 carries
- Rondale Moore10%, 3 carries
- Emari Demercado7%, 2 carries
Los Angeles Rams
Snap Share
Cooper KuppWR57 snaps100%
Puka NacuaWR55 snaps96%
Tyler HigbeeTE54 snaps95%
Tutu AtwellWR50 snaps88%
Kyren WilliamsRB47 snaps82%
Target Share21 targets
- Cooper Kupp43%, 9 targets
- Puka Nacua33%, 7 targets
- Tyler Higbee14%, 3 targets
- Tutu Atwell5%, 1 targets
- Ronnie Rivers5%, 1 targets
Carry Share28 carries
- Kyren Williams71%, 20 carries
- Zach Evans14%, 4 carries
- Ronnie Rivers11%, 3 carries
- Matthew Stafford4%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57 | 100% | 9 | 43% | 0 | |
| 55 | 96% | 7 | 33% | 0 | |
| 54 | 95% | 3 | 14% | 0 | |
| 68 | 89% | 11 | 29% | 0 | |
| 67 | 88% | 4 | 11% | 0 | |
| 50 | 88% | 1 | 5% | 0 | |
| 47 | 82% | 0 | 0% | 20 | |
| 50 | 66% | 7 | 18% | 3 | |
| 44 | 58% | 5 | 13% | 0 | |
| 35 | 46% | 5 | 13% | 0 | |
| 33 | 43% | 1 | 3% | 2 | |
| 28 | 37% | 2 | 5% | 10 | |
| 16 | 21% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 15 | 20% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 13 | 17% | 1 | 3% | 8 | |
| 11 | 14% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 6 | 11% | 0 | 0% | 4 | |
| 4 | 7% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 4 | 7% | 1 | 5% | 3 | |
| 4 | 7% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 3 | 5% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+12.8Cooper Kupp27.8 PTS vs 15.0 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−11.0Hollywood Brown7.4 PTS vs 18.4 xFP
- Highest expected volume21.5 xFPJoshua Dobbs11.1 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joshua DobbsARI · QB | 11.1 | 21.5 | −10.4 | 100% | 41 att | — | 41 | 7 | 23% | 0 | 0% |
| Hollywood BrownARI · — | 7.4 | 18.4 | −11.0 | — | 29% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 11 | 29% |
| Cooper KuppLAR · WR | 27.8 | 15.0 | +12.8 | 100% | 43% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 9 | 43% |
| Rondale MooreARI · WR | 6.6 | 13.5 | −6.9 | 66% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 3 | 10% | 7 | 18% |
| Kyren WilliamsLAR · RB | 21.8 | 12.3 | +9.5 | 82% | 71% car | — | 0 | 20 | 71% | 0 | 0% |
| Puka NacuaLAR · WR | 6.6 | 11.7 | −5.1 | 96% | 33% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 33% |
| Matthew StaffordLAR · QB | 13.2 | 10.7 | +2.5 | 100% | 24 att | — | 24 | 1 | 4% | 0 | 0% |
| Keaontay IngramARI · RB | 7.1 | 9.5 | −2.4 | 37% | 33% car | — | 0 | 10 | 33% | 2 | 5% |
| Trey McBrideARI · TE | 10.2 | 8.3 | +1.9 | 58% | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 13% |
| Zach ErtzARI · TE | 4.2 | 8.3 | −4.1 | 46% | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 13% |
| Michael WilsonARI · WR | 9.2 | 6.7 | +2.5 | 88% | 11% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 11% |
| Damien WilliamsARI · RB | 5.4 | 6.6 | −1.2 | 17% | 27% car | — | 0 | 8 | 27% | 1 | 3% |
| Tyler HigbeeLAR · TE | 3.8 | 5.0 | −1.2 | 95% | 14% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 14% |
| Ronnie RiversLAR · RB | 2.3 | 3.5 | −1.2 | 7% | 11% car | — | 0 | 3 | 11% | 1 | 5% |
| Emari DemercadoARI · RB | 2.7 | 2.9 | −0.2 | 43% | 7% car | — | 0 | 2 | 7% | 1 | 3% |
| Zach EvansLAR · RB | 1.0 | 2.5 | −1.5 | 11% | 14% car | — | 0 | 4 | 14% | 0 | 0% |
| Greg DortchARI · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 21% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Tutu AtwellLAR · WR | 4.0 | 1.7 | +2.3 | 88% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 5% |
| Zach PascalARI · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 14% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
Team totals: Cardinals 38 targets and 30 carries; Rams 21 targets and 28 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2023 season: 1.67 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.61 per carry and 0.42 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Joshua Dobbs Unlucky
ARI · QB · 11.1 pts on 21.5 expected
21 of 41 passing for 235 yards, 1 interception; 7 carries for 47 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 21.5 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 1.0, 25.2, 17.1, 23.4, 10.7, 11.1
W1W2W3W4W5W6
Matthew Stafford
LAR · QB · 13.2 pts on 10.7 expected
15 of 24 passing for 226 yards, 1 touchdown; 1 carry for 2 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 10.7 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 14.5, 16.0, 13.5, 17.2, 16.9, 13.2
W1W2W3W4W5W6
No interceptions after 5 in the previous four games. Lowest-scoring game of the season.
Hollywood Brown Unlucky
ARI · — · 7.4 pts on 18.4 expected
11 targets (29% of the team's), 4 catches for 34 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 18.4 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Rondale Moore Unlucky
ARI · WR · 6.6 pts on 13.5 expected
7 targets (18% of the team's), 4 catches for 30 yards; 3 carries (10% of the team's) for -4 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 13.5 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 7.5, 2.4, 16.2, 0.0, 10.6, 6.6
W1W2W3W4W5W6
Season high in targets (7).
Cooper Kupp Ran hot
LAR · WR · 27.8 pts on 15.0 expected
9 targets (43% of the team's), 7 catches for 148 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 15.0 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Start/Sit: Cooper Kupp →Kyren Williams Ran hot
LAR · RB · 21.8 pts on 12.3 expected
20 carries (71% of the team's) for 158 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 12.3 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 17.4, 28.0, 8.5, 27.7, 7.7, 21.8
W1W2W3W4W5W6
A touchdown in 4 of the last 6 games.
Puka Nacua Volume, no payoff
LAR · WR · 6.6 pts on 11.7 expected
7 targets (33% of the team's), 4 catches for 26 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 11.7 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 21.9, 30.1, 12.2, 31.3, 20.1, 6.6
W1W2W3W4W5W6
Lowest-scoring game of the season.
Keaontay Ingram
ARI · RB · 7.1 pts on 9.5 expected
2 targets (5% of the team's), 2 catches for 11 yards; 10 carries (33% of the team's) for 40 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 9.5 expected.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): -0.4, 0.6, 3.1, 7.1
W1W2W3W6
Season high in carries (10). Best fantasy game of the season.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Arizona Cardinals
- ▲Stock up: Keaontay Ingram played 37% of the snaps, up from a 14% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Trey McBride played 58% of the snaps, up from a 39% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Michael Wilson played 88% of the snaps, up from a 69% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2023 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Cardinals D | Rams D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 19.4 | 18.9 |
| RBs | 26.2 | 16.0 |
| WRs | 32.5 | 34.5 |
| TEs | 11.2 | 13.2 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Los Angeles opened at 50% win probability and passed 98% in the fourth quarter on the way to the win.
Rams win probability
Key Swings
- +10Maher 29-yd FG40% → 50%Q1 0:11
- −11Prater 27-yd FG38% → 27%Q2 0:43
- +11Maher 35-yd FG27% → 38%Q2 0:04
- +32Stafford → Kupp, 13-yd TD36% → 68%Q3 8:57
- +12Maher 25-yd FG71% → 83%Q3 2:44
Swing in Rams win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Arizona Cardinals | Measure | Los Angeles Rams |
|---|---|---|
| 73 | Plays | 55 |
| 59% | Pass rate | 49% |
| 5.0 | Yds / dropback | 7.5 |
| 4.3 | Yds / carry | 6.4 |
| 6/16 | Third downs | 4/12 |
Efficiency edge Los Angeles ran 18 fewer plays but gained 2.5 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- ARI Brown 29% · Moore 18% · McBride 13%
- LAR Kupp 43% · Nacua 33% · Higbee 14%
Possession Results
| Result | ARI | LAR |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 0 | 2 |
| Field goals | 3 | 4 |
| Punts | 3 | 4 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 0 |
| Turnovers on downs | 2 | 0 |
LAR turnover edge: +2
- The Cardinals opened the scoring on their first possession, a 8-play, 38-yard drive that ended in a field goal.
- The Rams drained the clock with three second-half drives of four to seven minutes.
All 22 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARI | Q1 15:00 | 8 | 38 | 3:35 | Field goal |
| LAR | Q1 11:25 | 5 | 25 | 2:16 | Punt |
| ARI | Q1 9:09 | 11 | 40 | 7:02 | Punt |
| LAR | Q1 2:07 | 6 | 48 | 1:56 | Field goal |
| ARI | Q1 0:11 | 4 | 15 | 1:44 | Punt |
| ARI | Q2 13:27 | 4 | 3 | 0:52 | Field goal |
| LAR | Q2 12:35 | 3 | -2 | 2:07 | Punt |
| ARI | Q2 10:28 | 6 | 19 | 3:19 | Downs |
| LAR | Q2 7:09 | 3 | -11 | 2:04 | Punt |
| ARI | Q2 5:05 | 11 | 63 | 4:22 | Field goal |
| LAR | Q2 0:43 | 5 | 58 | 0:39 | Field goal |
| ARI | Q2 0:04 | 1 | -1 | 0:04 | End of half |
| LAR | Q3 15:00 | 10 | 75 | 6:03 | Touchdown |
| ARI | Q3 8:57 | 3 | 3 | 1:42 | Punt |
| LAR | Q3 7:15 | 8 | 80 | 4:31 | Field goal |
| ARI | Q3 2:44 | 6 | 63 | 2:50 | Interception |
| LAR | Q4 14:54 | 12 | 88 | 6:35 | Touchdown |
| ARI | Q4 8:19 | 5 | 8 | 2:04 | Fumble |
| LAR | Q4 6:15 | 4 | 8 | 1:38 | Field goal |
| ARI | Q4 4:37 | 8 | 28 | 1:05 | Downs |
| LAR | Q4 3:32 | 3 | 4 | 1:41 | Punt |
| ARI | Q4 1:51 | 9 | 70 | 1:51 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Cardinals vs Rams Head-to-Head
One of the NFL's oldest matchups: the two franchises first met in 1937, when the Cardinals played in Chicago and the Rams in Cleveland, and they have been NFC West rivals since 2002.
- All-time series
- 53–41–2Rams lead, 96 meetings since 1937
- Postseason
- 2–0Rams won in 1975 and 2021
- Largest Cardinals win
- 44–62016
- Largest Rams win
- 34–02018
Since 2021
8–3 Rams lead
11 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- C
- R
- R
- R
- C
- R
- R
- C
- R
- R
- R
Oldest to newest. R = Rams win, C = Cardinals win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 6 Cardinals at Rams Upcoming
- Week 10 Rams at Cardinals Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wk 18 Cardinals at Rams, 2025 Wk 18 recap LAR 37 ARI 20 LAR W
- 2025 Wk 14 Rams at Cardinals, 2025 Wk 14 recap LAR 45 ARI 17 LAR W
- 2024 Wk 17 Cardinals at Rams, 2024 Wk 17 recap LAR 13 ARI 9 LAR W
- 2024 Wk 2 Rams at Cardinals, 2024 Wk 2 recap ARI 41 LAR 10 ARI W
- 2023 Wk 12 Rams at Cardinals, 2023 Wk 12 recap LAR 37 ARI 14 LAR W
- 2023 Wk 6 Cardinals at Rams LAR 26 ARI 9 LAR W
- 2022 Wk 10 Cardinals at Rams, 2022 Wk 10 recap ARI 27 LAR 17 ARI W
- 2022 Wk 3 Rams at Cardinals, 2022 Wk 3 recap LAR 20 ARI 12 LAR W
- 2021 Wild Card Cardinals at Rams, 2021 Wild Card recap LAR 34 ARI 11 LAR W
- 2021 Wk 14 Rams at Cardinals, 2021 Wk 14 recap LAR 30 ARI 23 LAR W
- 2021 Wk 4 Cardinals at Rams, 2021 Wk 4 recap ARI 37 LAR 20 ARI W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2023 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Cardinals | Stat | Rams |
|---|---|---|
| 4-13 | Record | 10-7 |
| 19.4 | Points per game | 23.8 |
| 324.1 | Yards per game | 359.3 |
| 5.2 | Yards per play | 5.6 |
| 26.8 | Points allowed per game | 22.2 |
| 355.7 | Yards allowed per game | 337.9 |
Cardinals vs Rams Fantasy Outlook for 2026
Two meetings are left on the 2026 schedule: Week 6 in Los Angeles and Week 10 in Arizona. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Cardinals or Rams player start in Week 6? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Cardinals and Rams players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Cardinals and Rams defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere these two matchups fall in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2023 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Cardinals vs Rams Game FAQ
Who won the 2023 Cardinals vs Rams Week 6 game?
The Los Angeles Rams beat the Arizona Cardinals 26–9 in Week 6 of the 2023 season. The game was played at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, CA, on October 15, 2023. See the Rams' 2023 schedule.
What was the final score of Cardinals vs Rams?
The final score was Rams 26, Cardinals 9. The Cardinals led 9–6 at halftime, and the second half went Cardinals 0, Rams 20.
What happened in the Cardinals vs Rams game?
Los Angeles erased a 9–6 halftime deficit, outscoring Arizona 20–0 after the break to win 26–9. The Rams finished with a 382–345 edge in total offense and averaged 6.9 yards per play. Cooper Kupp led all players with 7 catches for 148 yards and a touchdown. The Cardinals committed 2 turnovers, the Rams 1.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Cardinals vs Rams?
Cooper Kupp led the game with 27.8 PPR fantasy points, the WR4 of Week 6, on 7 catches for 148 yards and a touchdown. Kyren Williams was next with 21.8 (RB3). See Cooper Kupp's 2023 game log.
Who led Cardinals vs Rams in passing, rushing and receiving?
Joshua Dobbs (ARI) led all passers with 21 of 41 for 235 yards and an interception. Kyren Williams (LAR) led in rushing with 20 carries for 158 yards and a touchdown. Cooper Kupp (LAR) led in receiving with 7 catches for 148 yards and a touchdown.
How many fantasy points did Cooper Kupp score against the Cardinals?
Cooper Kupp scored 27.8 points in PPR leagues, 24.3 in half-PPR and 20.8 in standard scoring against the Cardinals in Week 6 of the 2023 season, on 7 catches for 148 yards and a touchdown. He drew 43% of his team's targets.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Cardinals vs Rams?
Cooper Kupp outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 27.8 PPR points on 15.0 xFP (+12.8). Hollywood Brown fell furthest short, with 7.4 points on 18.4 xFP (−11.0). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Cardinals vs Rams?
Joshua Dobbs had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 21.5 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 11.1. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Rams beat the Cardinals?
The Rams beat the Cardinals 26–9 because they averaged 6.9 yards per play to 4.7, won the turnover battle 2–1, and outgained them 382–345.
Which team won the turnover battle in Cardinals vs Rams?
The Rams won the turnover battle 2–1: the Cardinals gave the ball away 2 times and the Rams 1 time. The Rams won the game.
What was the turning point of Cardinals vs Rams?
Matthew Stafford's 13-yard touchdown pass to Cooper Kupp with 8:57 left in the third quarter was the biggest swing of the game, moving the Rams' win probability from 36% to 68%.
What is the all-time Cardinals vs Rams record?
The Rams lead the all-time series 53–41–2 across 96 meetings since 1937, including a 2–0 record in the postseason.
When did the Cardinals and Rams last play before this game?
Before Week 6 of 2023, they last met in the 2022 season on November 13, 2022, when the Cardinals beat the Rams 27–17.
Have the Cardinals and Rams met in the playoffs?
Yes, 2 times, most recently in the 2021 playoffs. The Cardinals are 0–2 against the Rams in the postseason.
What is the Cardinals vs Rams record since 2021?
The Rams lead 8–3 across 11 meetings since the 2021 season, including this game.
