Final2022 Week 3
State Farm Stadium, Glendale, AZ|
Los Angeles Rams vs Arizona Cardinals, Week 3 2022
Los Angeles Rams
AwayWon
20
Arizona Cardinals
Home
12
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rams | 10 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 20 |
| Cardinals | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 12 |
LAR 20 · ARI 12 Final
Passing leader
ARI · QB
13.4PPR pts
37/58, 314 YDS
Top fantasy scorer
Hollywood Brown
ARI
28.0PPR pts
14 REC, 140 YDS
Cardinals leader
ARI · WR
17.0PPR pts
9 REC, 80 YDS
Defensive playmaker
Aaron Donald
LAR
1 SACK, 6 TKL
Rams 20, Cardinals 12: Los Angeles beats Arizona
Los Angeles led 13–6 at halftime and outscored Arizona 7–6 after the break to win 20–12. Arizona outgained the Rams 365–339, but the Rams averaged 7.4 yards per play.
The Cardinals went 6-for-18 on third down.
The two teams meet again in Week 6 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +2.9 yards/play LAR 7.4 · ARI 4.5
- +5% third-down rate LAR 38% · ARI 33%
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Ram or Cardinal on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Rams Won
Los Angeles won the efficiency and third-down battles.
| Rams | Stat | Cardinals |
|---|---|---|
| 7.4 | Yards per play | 4.5 |
| 38% | Third-down conversion | 33% |
| Other team stats | ||
| 339 | Total yards | 365 |
| 46 | Plays | 81 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 0 |
| 26:04 | Time of possession | 33:56 |
Scoring Summary
The Rams scored two touchdowns and two field goals; the Cardinals scored four field goals.
| Time | Team | Play | LAR | ARI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 9:45 | LAR | Matt Gay 22-yard FG Takes lead | 3 | 0 |
| 4:00 | LAR | Cooper Kupp 20-yard TD run Extends leadMatt Gay XP | 10 | 0 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 13:23 | LAR | Matt Gay 40-yard FG Extends lead | 13 | 0 |
| 1:51 | ARI | Matt Prater 23-yard FG | 13 | 3 |
| 0:02 | ARI | Matt Prater 43-yard FG | 13 | 6 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 5:10 | ARI | Matt Prater 49-yard FG | 13 | 9 |
| 1:00 | LAR | Cam Akers 14-yard TD run Extends leadMatt Gay XP | 20 | 9 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 1:07 | ARI | Matt Prater 31-yard FG | 20 | 12 |
Fantasy Points: Rams vs Cardinals, Week 3 2022
Fantasy leaders
- Marquise BrownARI · WR28.0 PTSWR3
- Greg DortchARI · WR17.0 PTSWR19
- Cooper KuppLAR · WR16.4 PTSWR22
- Kyler MurrayARI · QB12.4 PTSQB23
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.4 | QB23 | 37/58 | 314 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 77.8 | Start/Sit → | |
| 10.2 | QB27 | 18/25 | 249 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 103.6 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28.0 | WR3 | WR | — | — | — | 17 | 14 | 140 | 0 | ||
| 17.0 | WR19 | WR | — | — | — | 10 | 9 | 80 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 16.4 | WR22 | WR | 1 | 20 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 44 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 10.6 | WR44 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 66 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 10.5 | TE12 | TE | — | — | — | 10 | 6 | 45 | 0 | ||
| 10.1 | TE14 | TE | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 61 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.1 | RB32 | RB | 12 | 61 | 1 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 8.7 | RB34 | RB | 13 | 39 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 18 | 0 | ||
| 5.7 | WR68 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 27 | 0 | ||
| 4.3 | RB53 | RB | 5 | 16 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 0 | ||
| 4.3 | WR76 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 2 | 23 | 0 | ||
| 3.8 | TE39 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 28 | 0 | ||
| 3.3 | WR88 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 13 | 0 | ||
| 2.1 | WR102 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 11 | 0 | ||
| 1.7 | RB64 | RB | 4 | 17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0.7 | RB69 | RB | 1 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Los Angeles Rams
Snap Share
Cooper KuppWR48 snaps100%
Tyler HigbeeTE45 snaps94%
Allen RobinsonWR44 snaps92%
Ben SkowronekWR41 snaps85%
Darrell HendersonRB24 snaps50%
Target Share25 targets
- Cooper Kupp24%, 6 targets
- Allen Robinson20%, 5 targets
- Tyler Higbee16%, 4 targets
- Ben Skowronek16%, 4 targets
- Brandon Powell12%, 3 targets
- Other12%, 3 targets
Carry Share20 carries
- Cam Akers60%, 12 carries
- Darrell Henderson20%, 4 carries
- Matthew Stafford15%, 3 carries
- Cooper Kupp5%, 1 carries
Arizona Cardinals
Snap Share
Marquise BrownWR79 snaps95%
Zach ErtzTE77 snaps93%
Greg DortchWR67 snaps81%
James ConnerRB50 snaps60%
Andy IsabellaWR32 snaps39%
Target Share55 targets
- Marquise Brown31%, 17 targets
- Zach Ertz18%, 10 targets
- Greg Dortch18%, 10 targets
- James Conner9%, 5 targets
- Eno Benjamin7%, 4 targets
- Other16%, 9 targets
Carry Share21 carries
- James Conner62%, 13 carries
- Eno Benjamin24%, 5 carries
- Kyler Murray10%, 2 carries
- Darrel Williams5%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48 | 100% | 6 | 24% | 1 | |
| 79 | 95% | 17 | 31% | 0 | |
| 45 | 94% | 4 | 16% | 0 | |
| 77 | 93% | 10 | 18% | 0 | |
| 44 | 92% | 5 | 20% | 0 | |
| 41 | 85% | 4 | 16% | 0 | |
| 67 | 81% | 10 | 18% | 0 | |
| 50 | 60% | 5 | 9% | 13 | |
| 24 | 50% | 1 | 4% | 4 | |
| 24 | 50% | 0 | 0% | 12 | |
| 32 | 39% | 2 | 4% | 0 | |
| 28 | 34% | 2 | 4% | 0 | |
| 26 | 31% | 4 | 7% | 0 | |
| 22 | 27% | 4 | 7% | 5 | |
| 14 | 17% | 1 | 2% | 1 | |
| 6 | 13% | 3 | 12% | 0 | |
| 9 | 11% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 5 | 10% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 6 | 7% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 3 | 6% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 5 | 6% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+5.8Cooper Kupp16.4 PTS vs 10.6 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−12.4Kyler Murray13.4 PTS vs 25.8 xFP
- Highest expected volume28.3 xFPHollywood Brown28.0 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hollywood BrownARI · — | 28.0 | 28.3 | −0.3 | — | 31% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 17 | 31% |
| Kyler MurrayARI · QB | 13.4 | 25.8 | −12.4 | 100% | 58 att | — | 58 | 2 | 10% | 0 | 0% |
| Greg DortchARI · WR | 17.0 | 16.7 | +0.3 | 81% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 10 | 18% |
| James ConnerARI · RB | 8.7 | 16.7 | −8.0 | 60% | 62% car | — | 0 | 13 | 62% | 5 | 9% |
| Zach ErtzARI · TE | 10.5 | 16.7 | −6.2 | 93% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 10 | 18% |
| Matthew StaffordLAR · QB | 10.2 | 12.5 | −2.3 | 100% | 25 att | — | 25 | 3 | 15% | 0 | 0% |
| Cooper KuppLAR · WR | 16.4 | 10.6 | +5.8 | 100% | 24% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 5% | 6 | 24% |
| Eno BenjaminARI · RB | 4.3 | 9.9 | −5.6 | 27% | 24% car | — | 0 | 5 | 24% | 4 | 7% |
| Allen RobinsonLAR · WR | 4.3 | 8.3 | −4.0 | 92% | 20% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 20% |
| Cam AkersLAR · RB | 10.1 | 7.7 | +2.4 | 50% | 60% car | — | 0 | 12 | 60% | 0 | 0% |
| Andre BaccelliaARI · WR | 3.3 | 6.7 | −3.4 | 31% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 7% |
| Ben SkowronekLAR · WR | 10.6 | 6.7 | +3.9 | 85% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 16% |
| Tyler HigbeeLAR · TE | 10.1 | 6.7 | +3.4 | 94% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 16% |
| Brandon PowellLAR · WR | 5.7 | 5.0 | +0.7 | 13% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 12% |
| Darrell Henderson Jr.LAR · RB | 1.7 | 4.2 | −2.5 | 50% | 20% car | — | 0 | 4 | 20% | 1 | 4% |
| A.J. GreenARI · WR | 0.0 | 3.3 | −3.3 | 34% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 4% |
| Andy IsabellaARI · WR | 2.1 | 3.3 | −1.2 | 39% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 4% |
| Darrel WilliamsARI · RB | 0.7 | 2.3 | −1.6 | 17% | 5% car | — | 0 | 1 | 5% | 1 | 2% |
| Kendall BlantonLAR · TE | 3.8 | 1.7 | +2.1 | 10% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Tutu AtwellLAR · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 6% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
Team totals: Rams 25 targets and 20 carries; Cardinals 55 targets and 21 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2022 season: 1.67 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.64 per carry and 0.42 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Matthew Stafford
LAR · QB · 10.2 pts on 12.5 expected
18 of 25 passing for 249 yards; 3 carries for 2 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 12.5 expected.
Start/Sit: Matthew Stafford →Kyler Murray Unlucky
ARI · QB · 13.4 pts on 25.8 expected
37 of 58 passing for 314 yards; 2 carries for 8 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 25.8 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Start/Sit: Kyler Murray →Cooper Kupp Ran hot
LAR · WR · 16.4 pts on 10.6 expected
6 targets (24% of the team's), 4 catches for 44 yards; 1 carry (5% of the team's) for 20 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 10.6 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Start/Sit: Cooper Kupp →Allen Robinson
LAR · WR · 4.3 pts on 8.3 expected
5 targets (20% of the team's), 2 catches for 23 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 8.3 expected.
Hollywood Brown Volume, no payoff
ARI · — · 28.0 pts on 28.3 expected
17 targets (31% of the team's), 14 catches for 140 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 28.3 expected.
Greg Dortch
ARI · WR · 17.0 pts on 16.7 expected
10 targets (18% of the team's), 9 catches for 80 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 16.7 expected.
Trend: Season high in targets (10).
James Conner Volume, no payoff
ARI · RB · 8.7 pts on 16.7 expected
5 targets (9% of the team's), 3 catches for 18 yards; 13 carries (62% of the team's) for 39 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 16.7 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Trend: Season high in carries (13).
Zach Ertz Unlucky
ARI · TE · 10.5 pts on 16.7 expected
10 targets (18% of the team's), 6 catches for 45 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 16.7 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Los Angeles Rams
- ▲Stock up: Cam Akers led the backfield with 50% of the snaps after trailing Darrell Henderson Jr. before this game.
- ▼Stock down: Darrell Henderson Jr. lost the backfield lead: 50% of the snaps to Cam Akers's 50%.
Arizona Cardinals
- ▲Stock up: Zach Ertz played 93% of the snaps, up from a 72% season average.
- ▼Stock down: A.J. Green played 34% of the snaps, down from a 79% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Darrel Williams played 17% of the snaps, down from a 46% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2022 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Rams D | Cardinals D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 14.9 | 18.0 |
| RBs | 21.1 | 25.4 |
| WRs | 31.8 | 30.2 |
| TEs | 11.1 | 16.7 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Arizona opened at 40% win probability and fell below 2% in the fourth quarter.
Cardinals win probability
Key Swings
- −9Gay 22-yd FG40% → 32%Q1 9:45
- −17Kupp 20-yd TD run32% → 15%Q1 4:00
- +7Prater 43-yd FG11% → 18%Q2 0:02
- +11Prater 49-yd FG15% → 25%Q3 5:10
- −20Akers 14-yd TD run24% → 4%Q3 1:00
Swing in Cardinals win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Los Angeles Rams | Measure | Arizona Cardinals |
|---|---|---|
| 46 | Plays | 81 |
| 57% | Pass rate | 74% |
| 9.2 | Yds / dropback | 4.9 |
| 5.0 | Yds / carry | 3.3 |
| 3/8 | Third downs | 6/18 |
Efficiency edge Los Angeles ran 35 fewer plays but gained 4.3 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- LAR Kupp 24% · Robinson 20% · Skowronek 16%
- ARI Brown 31% · Dortch 18% · Ertz 18%
Possession Results
| Result | LAR | ARI |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 2 | 0 |
| Field goals | 2 | 4 |
| Punts | 3 | 4 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 0 |
| Turnovers on downs | 0 | 1 |
ARI turnover edge: +1
- The Rams opened the scoring on their first possession, a 8-play, 31-yard drive that ended in a field goal.
- The Rams drained the clock with two second-half drives of four to five minutes.
All 19 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARI | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 8 | 1:26 | Punt |
| LAR | Q1 13:34 | 8 | 31 | 3:49 | Field goal |
| ARI | Q1 9:45 | 3 | 2 | 0:55 | Punt |
| LAR | Q1 8:50 | 7 | 58 | 4:50 | Touchdown |
| ARI | Q1 4:00 | 4 | 16 | 2:29 | Punt |
| LAR | Q1 1:31 | 6 | 58 | 3:08 | Field goal |
| ARI | Q2 13:23 | 3 | -4 | 1:00 | Punt |
| LAR | Q2 12:23 | 3 | 3 | 1:02 | Punt |
| ARI | Q2 11:21 | 19 | 65 | 9:30 | Field goal |
| LAR | Q2 1:51 | 3 | 5 | 1:03 | Punt |
| ARI | Q2 0:48 | 8 | 47 | 0:46 | Field goal |
| LAR | Q2 0:02 | 0 | 0 | 0:02 | End of half |
| LAR | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 5 | 2:03 | Punt |
| ARI | Q3 12:57 | 16 | 58 | 7:47 | Field goal |
| LAR | Q3 5:10 | 8 | 75 | 4:10 | Touchdown |
| ARI | Q3 1:00 | 12 | 49 | 4:31 | Downs |
| LAR | Q4 11:29 | 8 | 71 | 4:50 | Fumble |
| ARI | Q4 6:39 | 17 | 84 | 5:32 | Field goal |
| LAR | Q4 1:07 | 2 | -2 | 1:07 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Rams vs Cardinals Head-to-Head
One of the NFL's oldest matchups: the two franchises first met in 1937, when the Cardinals played in Chicago and the Rams in Cleveland, and they have been NFC West rivals since 2002.
- All-time series
- 53–41–2Rams lead, 96 meetings since 1937
- Postseason
- 2–0Rams won in 1975 and 2021
- Largest Rams win
- 34–02018
- Largest Cardinals win
- 44–62016
Since 2021
8–3 Rams lead
11 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- C
- R
- R
- R
- C
- R
- R
- C
- R
- R
- R
Oldest to newest. R = Rams win, C = Cardinals win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 6 Cardinals at Rams Upcoming
- Week 10 Rams at Cardinals Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wk 18 Cardinals at Rams, 2025 Wk 18 recap LAR 37 ARI 20 LAR W
- 2025 Wk 14 Rams at Cardinals, 2025 Wk 14 recap LAR 45 ARI 17 LAR W
- 2024 Wk 17 Cardinals at Rams, 2024 Wk 17 recap LAR 13 ARI 9 LAR W
- 2024 Wk 2 Rams at Cardinals, 2024 Wk 2 recap ARI 41 LAR 10 ARI W
- 2023 Wk 12 Rams at Cardinals, 2023 Wk 12 recap LAR 37 ARI 14 LAR W
- 2023 Wk 6 Cardinals at Rams, 2023 Wk 6 recap LAR 26 ARI 9 LAR W
- 2022 Wk 10 Cardinals at Rams, 2022 Wk 10 recap ARI 27 LAR 17 ARI W
- 2022 Wk 3 Rams at Cardinals LAR 20 ARI 12 LAR W
- 2021 Wild Card Cardinals at Rams, 2021 Wild Card recap LAR 34 ARI 11 LAR W
- 2021 Wk 14 Rams at Cardinals, 2021 Wk 14 recap LAR 30 ARI 23 LAR W
- 2021 Wk 4 Cardinals at Rams, 2021 Wk 4 recap ARI 37 LAR 20 ARI W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2022 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Rams | Stat | Cardinals |
|---|---|---|
| 5-12 | Record | 4-13 |
| 18.1 | Points per game | 20.0 |
| 280.5 | Yards per game | 323.5 |
| 4.8 | Yards per play | 4.8 |
| 22.6 | Points allowed per game | 26.4 |
| 341.1 | Yards allowed per game | 348.9 |
Rams vs Cardinals Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- LAR −3.5Rams covered by 4.5
- Total
- 48.5Under: 32 points scored (by 16.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rams | 26.0 | 20 | −6.0 |
| Cardinals | 22.5 | 12 | −10.5 |
Both offenses finished under the market's expectation, which matches the low fantasy output in the Fantasy tab.
Betting Trends
Last 4 meetings: Rams 3–1 ATS, overs and unders 2–2.
Each team's 2022 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Los Angeles Rams
- Against the spread
- 1–2
- Over/under
- 1–2
- ATS as favorite
- 1–1
- ATS as underdog
- 0–1
- ATS on the road
- 1–0
Arizona Cardinals
- Against the spread
- 1–2
- Over/under
- 1–1–1
- ATS as underdog
- 1–2
- ATS at home
- 0–2
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Rams vs Cardinals Fantasy Outlook for 2026
Two meetings are left on the 2026 schedule: Week 6 in Los Angeles and Week 10 in Arizona. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Rams or Cardinals player start in Week 6? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Rams and Cardinals players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Rams and Cardinals defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere these two matchups fall in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2022 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Rams vs Cardinals Game FAQ
Who won the 2022 Rams vs Cardinals Week 3 game?
The Los Angeles Rams beat the Arizona Cardinals 20–12 in Week 3 of the 2022 season. The game was played at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, AZ, on September 25, 2022. See the Rams' 2022 schedule.
What was the final score of Rams vs Cardinals?
The final score was Rams 20, Cardinals 12. The Rams led 13–6 at halftime, and the second half went Rams 7, Cardinals 6.
What happened in the Rams vs Cardinals game?
Los Angeles led 13–6 at halftime and outscored Arizona 7–6 after the break to win 20–12. Arizona outgained the Rams 365–339, but the Rams averaged 7.4 yards per play. Marquise Brown led all players with 14 catches for 140 yards. The Rams committed 1 turnover, the Cardinals none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Rams vs Cardinals?
Marquise Brown led the game with 28.0 PPR fantasy points, the WR3 of Week 3, on 14 catches for 140 yards. Greg Dortch was next with 17.0 (WR19). See Marquise Brown's 2022 game log.
Who led Rams vs Cardinals in passing, rushing and receiving?
Kyler Murray (ARI) led all passers with 37 of 58 for 314 yards. Cam Akers (LAR) led in rushing with 12 carries for 61 yards and a touchdown. Marquise Brown (ARI) led in receiving with 14 catches for 140 yards.
How many fantasy points did Marquise Brown score against the Rams?
Marquise Brown scored 28.0 points in PPR leagues, 21.0 in half-PPR and 14.0 in standard scoring against the Rams in Week 3 of the 2022 season, on 14 catches for 140 yards.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Rams vs Cardinals?
Cooper Kupp outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 16.4 PPR points on 10.6 xFP (+5.8). Kyler Murray fell furthest short, with 13.4 points on 25.8 xFP (−12.4). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
How did the Rams beat the Cardinals?
The Rams beat the Cardinals 20–12 because they averaged 7.4 yards per play to 4.5.
Which team won the turnover battle in Rams vs Cardinals?
The Cardinals won the turnover battle 1–0: the Rams gave the ball away 1 time and the Cardinals not at all. The Rams won the game anyway.
What is the all-time Rams vs Cardinals record?
The Rams lead the all-time series 53–41–2 across 96 meetings since 1937, including a 2–0 record in the postseason.
When did the Rams and Cardinals last play before this game?
Before Week 3 of 2022, they last met in the 2021 playoffs on January 17, 2022, when the Rams beat the Cardinals 34–11.
Have the Rams and Cardinals met in the playoffs?
Yes, 2 times, most recently in the 2021 playoffs. The Rams are 2–0 against the Cardinals in the postseason.
What was the closing spread for Rams vs Cardinals?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Rams −3.5, making the Los Angeles Rams 3.5-point favorites, with a closing total of 48.5. That implied about 26.0 points for the Rams and 22.5 for the Cardinals.
Did Rams vs Cardinals go over or under the total?
The game went under. The consensus closing total was 48.5, and the teams combined for 32 points, 16.5 under the number.
Who covered the spread in Rams vs Cardinals?
The Rams covered by 4.5 against the closing line of Rams −3.5. The final margin was 8 points.
