Final2026 Week 2
State Farm Stadium, Glendale, AZ|
Seattle Seahawks vs Arizona Cardinals, Week 2 2026
Seattle Seahawks
AwayWon
31
Arizona Cardinals
Home
7
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seahawks | 7 | 0 | 10 | 14 | 31 |
| Cardinals | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
SEA 31 · ARI 7 Final
Passing leader
SEA · QB
21.4PPR pts
19/26, 235 YDS, 3 TD
Top fantasy scorer
SEA · WR
42.5PPR pts
9 REC, 155 YDS, 3 TD
Cardinals leader
ARI · TE
18.1PPR pts
8 REC, 41 YDS, 1 TD
Defensive playmaker
Julian Love
SEA
1 INT, 3 TKL
Seahawks 31, Cardinals 7: Seattle pulls away from Arizona
Seattle broke a 7–7 halftime tie, outscoring Arizona 24–0 after the break to win 31–7. The Seahawks finished with a 381–151 edge in total offense and averaged 5.7 yards per play.
The Cardinals went 3-for-12 on third down and committed one turnover, while the Seahawks kept the ball for 36:33.
The two teams meet again in Week 9 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +2.5 yards/play SEA 5.7 · ARI 3.2
- +230 total yards SEA 381 · ARI 151
- +21% third-down rate SEA 46% · ARI 25%
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Seahawk or Cardinal on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Seahawks Won
Seattle won the efficiency, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Seahawks | Stat | Cardinals |
|---|---|---|
| 5.7 | Yards per play | 3.2 |
| 381 | Total yards | 151 |
| 46% | Third-down conversion | 25% |
| Other team stats | ||
| 67 | Plays | 47 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 1 |
| 36:33 | Time of possession | 23:27 |
Scoring Summary
The Seahawks scored four touchdowns and one field goal; the Cardinals scored one touchdown.
| Time | Team | Play | SEA | ARI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 12:25 | SEA | Drew Lock → Jaxon Smith-Njigba, 82-yard TD Takes leadJason Myers XP | 7 | 0 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 14:57 | ARI | Jacoby Brissett → Trey McBride, 2-yard TD Ties gameChad Ryland XP | 7 | 7 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 12:27 | SEA | Drew Lock → Jaxon Smith-Njigba, 7-yard TD Takes leadJason Myers XP | 14 | 7 |
| 6:47 | SEA | Jason Myers 33-yard FG Extends lead | 17 | 7 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 12:40 | SEA | Drew Lock → Jaxon Smith-Njigba, 12-yard TD Extends leadJason Myers XP | 24 | 7 |
| 1:11 | SEA | AJ Barner 1-yard TD run Extends leadJason Myers XP | 31 | 7 |
Fantasy Points: Seahawks vs Cardinals, Week 2 2026
Fantasy leaders
- Jaxon Smith-NjigbaSEA · WR42.5 PTSWR1
- Drew LockSEA · QB21.4 PTSQB9
- Trey McBrideARI · TE18.1 PTSTE6
- Emanuel WilsonSEA · RB9.2 PTSRB28
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.4 | QB9 | 19/26 | 235 | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 139.1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.5 | QB28 | 17/28 | 95 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 63.8 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42.5 | WR1 | WR | — | — | — | 11 | 9 | 155 | 3 | Start/Sit → | |
| 18.1 | TE6 | TE | — | — | — | 10 | 8 | 41 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.2 | RB28 | RB | 21 | 92 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.9 | TE20 | TE | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.5 | RB37 | RB | 9 | 29 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.9 | WR53 | WR | 1 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 35 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.0 | RB43 | RB | 13 | 52 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.0 | WR79 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.9 | RB49 | RB | 5 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.8 | WR83 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 2 | 18 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.1 | WR87 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 11 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.7 | TE38 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 17 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.5 | RB60 | RB | 4 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.4 | RB62 | RB | 2 | 24 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | -10 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Seattle Seahawks
Snap Share
AJ BarnerTE56 snaps80%
Jaxon Smith-NjigbaWR47 snaps67%
Rashid ShaheedWR39 snaps56%
Brady RussellRB31 snaps44%
Cooper KuppWR30 snaps43%
Target Share26 targets
- Jaxon Smith-Njigba42%, 11 targets
- Rashid Shaheed23%, 6 targets
- Cooper Kupp8%, 2 targets
- Jadarian Price8%, 2 targets
- Eric Saubert4%, 1 targets
- Other15%, 4 targets
Carry Share40 carries
- Emanuel Wilson53%, 21 carries
- Jadarian Price33%, 13 carries
- George Holani10%, 4 carries
- Rashid Shaheed3%, 1 carries
- AJ Barner3%, 1 carries
Arizona Cardinals
Snap Share
Michael WilsonWR47 snaps94%
Trey McBrideTE44 snaps88%
Marvin HarrisonWR37 snaps74%
Tyler AllgeierRB32 snaps64%
Kendrick BourneWR30 snaps60%
Target Share26 targets
- Trey McBride38%, 10 targets
- Michael Wilson27%, 7 targets
- Kendrick Bourne12%, 3 targets
- Jeremiyah Love12%, 3 targets
- Tyler Allgeier8%, 2 targets
- Other4%, 1 targets
Carry Share17 carries
- Jeremiyah Love53%, 9 carries
- Tyler Allgeier29%, 5 carries
- Zonovan Knight12%, 2 carries
- Jacoby Brissett6%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47 | 94% | 7 | 27% | 0 | |
| 44 | 88% | 10 | 38% | 0 | |
| 56 | 80% | 1 | 4% | 1 | |
| 37 | 74% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 47 | 67% | 11 | 42% | 0 | |
| 32 | 64% | 2 | 8% | 5 | |
| 30 | 60% | 3 | 12% | 0 | |
| 39 | 56% | 6 | 23% | 1 | |
| 31 | 44% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 30 | 43% | 2 | 8% | 0 | |
| 29 | 41% | 1 | 4% | 21 | |
| 20 | 40% | 3 | 12% | 9 | |
| 24 | 34% | 2 | 8% | 13 | |
| 22 | 31% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 15 | 30% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 19 | 27% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 13 | 26% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 18 | 26% | 1 | 4% | 4 | |
| 17 | 24% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 15 | 21% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 6 | 12% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 3 | 6% | 0 | 0% | 2 | |
| 2 | 4% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+23.3Jaxon Smith-Njigba42.5 PTS vs 19.2 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−8.4Michael Wilson3.8 PTS vs 12.2 xFP
- Highest expected volume19.2 xFPJaxon Smith-Njigba42.5 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaxon Smith-NjigbaSEA · WR | 42.5 | 19.2 | +23.3 | 67% | 42% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 11 | 42% |
| Trey McBrideARI · TE | 18.1 | 17.5 | +0.6 | 88% | 38% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 10 | 38% |
| Emanuel WilsonSEA · RB | 9.2 | 14.4 | −5.2 | 41% | 53% car | — | 0 | 21 | 53% | 1 | 4% |
| Jacoby BrissettARI · QB | 7.5 | 13.7 | −6.2 | 100% | 28 att | — | 28 | 1 | 6% | 0 | 0% |
| Michael WilsonARI · WR | 3.8 | 12.2 | −8.4 | 94% | 27% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 27% |
| Drew LockSEA · QB | 21.4 | 12.1 | +9.3 | 100% | 26 att | — | 26 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Jadarian PriceSEA · RB | 5.0 | 11.3 | −6.3 | 34% | 33% car | — | 0 | 13 | 33% | 2 | 8% |
| Rashid ShaheedSEA · WR | 6.9 | 11.1 | −4.2 | 56% | 23% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 6 | 23% |
| Jeremiyah LoveARI · RB | 7.5 | 10.7 | −3.2 | 40% | 53% car | — | 0 | 9 | 53% | 3 | 12% |
| Tyler AllgeierARI · RB | 3.9 | 6.5 | −2.6 | 64% | 29% car | — | 0 | 5 | 29% | 2 | 8% |
| Kendrick BourneARI · WR | 3.1 | 5.2 | −2.1 | 60% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 12% |
| George HolaniSEA · RB | 2.5 | 4.2 | −1.7 | 26% | 10% car | — | 0 | 4 | 10% | 1 | 4% |
| Cooper KuppSEA · WR | 4.0 | 3.5 | +0.5 | 43% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 8% |
| AJ BarnerSEA · TE | 7.9 | 2.4 | +5.5 | 80% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 1 | 4% |
| Elijah ArroyoSEA · TE | 2.7 | 1.7 | +1.0 | 21% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Eric SaubertSEA · TE | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 24% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Marvin Harrison Jr.ARI · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 74% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Bam KnightARI · — | 2.4 | 1.2 | +1.2 | — | 12% car | — | 0 | 2 | 12% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Seahawks 26 targets and 40 carries; Cardinals 26 targets and 17 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2026 season: 1.75 PPR points per target (68% catch rate), 0.60 per carry and 0.47 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Drew Lock Ran hot
SEA · QB · 21.4 pts on 12.1 expected
19 of 26 passing for 235 yards, 3 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 12.1 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 4 against the Chargers. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Drew Lock →Jacoby Brissett Unlucky
ARI · QB · 7.5 pts on 13.7 expected
17 of 28 passing for 95 yards, 1 touchdown, 1 interception; 1 carry for 7 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 13.7 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't. Next up: Week 4 against the Giants. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Jacoby Brissett →Jaxon Smith-Njigba Ran hot
SEA · WR · 42.5 pts on 19.2 expected
11 targets (42% of the team's), 9 catches for 155 yards and 3 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 19.2 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 4 against the Chargers. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Jaxon Smith-Njigba →Emanuel Wilson Unlucky
SEA · RB · 9.2 pts on 14.4 expected
1 target (4% of the team's), 0 catches for 0 yards; 21 carries (53% of the team's) for 92 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 14.4 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't. Next up: Week 4 against the Chargers. Bet on the role more than the result.
Trend: Season high in carries (21).
Trey McBride Strong role
ARI · TE · 18.1 pts on 17.5 expected
10 targets (38% of the team's), 8 catches for 41 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 17.5 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Giants. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Trey McBride →Michael Wilson Unlucky
ARI · WR · 3.8 pts on 12.2 expected
7 targets (27% of the team's), 2 catches for 18 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 12.2 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't. Next up: Week 4 against the Giants. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Michael Wilson →Jadarian Price Unlucky
SEA · RB · 5.0 pts on 11.3 expected
2 targets (8% of the team's), 1 catch for 8 yards; 13 carries (33% of the team's) for 52 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 11.3 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't. Next up: Week 4 against the Chargers. Bet on the role more than the result.
Trend: Season high in carries (13).
AJ Barner Ran hot
SEA · TE · 7.9 pts on 2.4 expected
1 target (4% of the team's), 1 catch for 8 yards; 1 carry (3% of the team's) for 1 yard and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 2.4 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 4 against the Chargers. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: AJ Barner →Stock Up, Stock Down
Seattle Seahawks
- ▲Stock up: Emanuel Wilson led the backfield with 41% of the snaps after trailing Jadarian Price before this game.
- ▼Stock down: Jadarian Price lost the backfield lead: 34% of the snaps to Emanuel Wilson's 41%.
- ▼Stock down: Jaxon Smith-Njigba played 67% of the snaps, down from a 90% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2026 through Week 3.
| Points allowed to | Seahawks D | Cardinals D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 13.6 | 22.3 |
| RBs | 15.4 | 16.4 |
| WRs | 22.7 | 39.0 |
| TEs | 11.3 | 17.6 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Arizona opened at 40% win probability and fell below 2% in the fourth quarter.
Cardinals win probability
Key Swings
- −18Lock → Smith-Njigba, 82-yd TD40% → 22%Q1 12:25
- +21Brissett → McBride, 2-yd TD21% → 41%Q2 14:57
- −26Lock → Smith-Njigba, 7-yd TD43% → 17%Q3 12:27
- −7Myers 33-yd FG15% → 8%Q3 6:47
- −4Lock → Smith-Njigba, 12-yd TD4% → <1%Q4 12:40
Swing in Cardinals win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Seattle Seahawks | Measure | Arizona Cardinals |
|---|---|---|
| 67 | Plays | 47 |
| 40% | Pass rate | 64% |
| 8.1 | Yds / dropback | 2.7 |
| 4.0 | Yds / carry | 4.1 |
| 6/13 | Third downs | 3/12 |
Efficiency edge Seattle ran 20 more plays and gained 5.4 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- SEA Smith-Njigba 42% · Shaheed 23% · Kupp 8%
- ARI McBride 38% · Wilson 27% · Love 12%
Possession Results
| Result | SEA | ARI |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 4 | 1 |
| Field goals | 1 | 0 |
| Punts | 2 | 7 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 1 |
| Turnovers on downs | 2 | 0 |
- The Seahawks opened the scoring on their first possession, a 2-play, 86-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
- The Seahawks drained the clock with three second-half drives of four to 11 minutes.
All 20 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARI | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 8 | 1:41 | Punt |
| SEA | Q1 13:19 | 2 | 86 | 0:54 | Touchdown |
| ARI | Q1 12:25 | 6 | 8 | 4:42 | Punt |
| SEA | Q1 7:43 | 3 | -2 | 1:27 | Punt |
| ARI | Q1 6:16 | 12 | 61 | 6:19 | Touchdown |
| SEA | Q2 14:57 | 3 | 27 | 1:27 | Fumble |
| ARI | Q2 13:30 | 3 | 6 | 1:20 | Punt |
| SEA | Q2 12:10 | 8 | 36 | 5:02 | Punt |
| ARI | Q2 7:08 | 3 | 8 | 1:44 | Punt |
| SEA | Q2 5:24 | 8 | 29 | 4:12 | Downs |
| ARI | Q2 1:12 | 6 | 32 | 0:47 | Punt |
| SEA | Q2 0:25 | 6 | 9 | 0:25 | Downs |
| SEA | Q3 15:00 | 4 | 37 | 2:33 | Touchdown |
| ARI | Q3 12:27 | 3 | 3 | 0:54 | Interception |
| SEA | Q3 11:33 | 8 | 29 | 4:46 | Field goal |
| ARI | Q3 6:47 | 6 | 16 | 3:34 | Punt |
| SEA | Q3 3:13 | 10 | 80 | 5:33 | Touchdown |
| ARI | Q4 12:40 | 3 | 1 | 1:15 | Punt |
| SEA | Q4 11:25 | 16 | 70 | 10:14 | Touchdown |
| ARI | Q4 1:11 | 2 | 24 | 1:11 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Seahawks vs Cardinals Head-to-Head
The Seahawks and Cardinals first met in 1976 and have played 55 times since. They have been NFC West rivals since 2002.
- All-time series
- 32–22–1Seahawks lead, 55 meetings since 1976
- Postseason
- 0No playoff meetings
- Largest Seahawks win
- 58–02012
- Largest Cardinals win
- 27–32009
Since 2021
10–1 Seahawks lead
11 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- C
- S
- S
- S
- S
- S
- S
- S
- S
- S
- S
Oldest to newest. S = Seahawks win, C = Cardinals win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 9 Cardinals at Seahawks Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2026 Wk 2 Seahawks at Cardinals SEA 31 ARI 7 SEA W
- 2025 Wk 10 Cardinals at Seahawks, 2025 Wk 10 recap SEA 44 ARI 22 SEA W
- 2025 Wk 4 Seahawks at Cardinals, 2025 Wk 4 recap SEA 23 ARI 20 SEA W
- 2024 Wk 14 Seahawks at Cardinals, 2024 Wk 14 recap SEA 30 ARI 18 SEA W
- 2024 Wk 12 Cardinals at Seahawks, 2024 Wk 12 recap SEA 16 ARI 6 SEA W
- 2023 Wk 18 Seahawks at Cardinals, 2023 Wk 18 recap SEA 21 ARI 20 SEA W
- 2023 Wk 7 Cardinals at Seahawks, 2023 Wk 7 recap SEA 20 ARI 10 SEA W
- 2022 Wk 9 Seahawks at Cardinals, 2022 Wk 9 recap SEA 31 ARI 21 SEA W
- 2022 Wk 6 Cardinals at Seahawks, 2022 Wk 6 recap SEA 19 ARI 9 SEA W
- 2021 Wk 18 Seahawks at Cardinals, 2021 Wk 18 recap SEA 38 ARI 30 SEA W
- 2021 Wk 11 Cardinals at Seahawks, 2021 Wk 11 recap ARI 23 SEA 13 ARI W
Season to Date (Through Week 3)
The 2026 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Seahawks | Stat | Cardinals |
|---|---|---|
| 2-1 | Record | 1-2 |
| 25.0 | Points per game | 21.0 |
| 367.7 | Yards per game | 303.0 |
| 6.2 | Yards per play | 4.5 |
| 16.7 | Points allowed per game | 27.0 |
| 228.7 | Yards allowed per game | 362.0 |
Seahawks vs Cardinals Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- SEA −3.5Seahawks covered by 20.5
- Total
- 40.5Under: 38 points scored (by 2.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seahawks | 22.0 | 31 | +9.0 |
| Cardinals | 18.5 | 7 | −11.5 |
The Seahawks beat their implied total and the Cardinals fell short of theirs; the Fantasy tab has the player lines behind it.
Betting Trends
Last 5 meetings: Seahawks 4–1 ATS, unders 3–2.
Each team's 2026 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Seattle Seahawks
- Against the spread
- 1–0–1
- Over/under
- 0–2
- ATS as favorite
- 1–0–1
- ATS on the road
- 1–0
Arizona Cardinals
- Against the spread
- 1–1
- Over/under
- 0–2
- ATS as underdog
- 1–1
- ATS at home
- 0–1
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Seahawks vs Cardinals Fantasy Outlook for 2026
One meeting is left on the 2026 schedule: Week 9 in Seattle. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Seahawks or Cardinals player start in Week 9? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Seahawks and Cardinals players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Seahawks and Cardinals defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere this matchup falls in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2026 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Seahawks vs Cardinals Game FAQ
Who won the 2026 Seahawks vs Cardinals Week 2 game?
The Seattle Seahawks beat the Arizona Cardinals 31–7 in Week 2 of the 2026 season. The game was played at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, AZ, on September 20, 2026. See the Seahawks' 2026 schedule.
What was the final score of Seahawks vs Cardinals?
The final score was Seahawks 31, Cardinals 7. The teams were tied 7–7 at halftime, and the second half went Seahawks 24, Cardinals 0.
What happened in the Seahawks vs Cardinals game?
Seattle broke a 7–7 halftime tie, outscoring Arizona 24–0 after the break to win 31–7. The Seahawks finished with a 381–151 edge in total offense and averaged 5.7 yards per play. Jaxon Smith-Njigba led all players with 9 catches for 155 yards and 3 touchdowns.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Seahawks vs Cardinals?
Jaxon Smith-Njigba led the game with 42.5 PPR fantasy points, the WR1 of Week 2, on 9 catches for 155 yards and 3 touchdowns. Drew Lock was next with 21.4 (QB9). See Jaxon Smith-Njigba's 2026 game log.
Who led Seahawks vs Cardinals in passing, rushing and receiving?
Drew Lock (SEA) led all passers with 19 of 26 for 235 yards and 3 touchdowns. Emanuel Wilson (SEA) led in rushing with 21 carries for 92 yards. Jaxon Smith-Njigba (SEA) led in receiving with 9 catches for 155 yards and 3 touchdowns.
How many fantasy points did Jaxon Smith-Njigba score against the Cardinals?
Jaxon Smith-Njigba scored 42.5 points in PPR leagues, 38.0 in half-PPR and 33.5 in standard scoring against the Cardinals in Week 2 of the 2026 season, on 9 catches for 155 yards and 3 touchdowns. He drew 42% of his team's targets.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Seahawks vs Cardinals?
Jaxon Smith-Njigba outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 42.5 PPR points on 19.2 xFP (+23.3). Michael Wilson fell furthest short, with 3.8 points on 12.2 xFP (−8.4). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Seahawks vs Cardinals?
Jaxon Smith-Njigba had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 19.2 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 42.5. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Seahawks beat the Cardinals?
The Seahawks beat the Cardinals 31–7 because they averaged 5.7 yards per play to 3.2 and outgained them 381–151.
What was the turning point of Seahawks vs Cardinals?
Drew Lock's 7-yard touchdown pass to Jaxon Smith-Njigba with 12:27 left in the third quarter was the biggest swing of the game, moving the Cardinals' win probability from 43% to 17%.
What is the all-time Seahawks vs Cardinals record?
The Seahawks lead the all-time series 32–22–1 across 55 meetings since 1976.
When did the Seahawks and Cardinals last play before this game?
Before Week 2 of 2026, they last met in the 2025 season on November 9, 2025, when the Seahawks beat the Cardinals 44–22.
What was the closing spread for Seahawks vs Cardinals?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Seahawks −3.5, making the Seattle Seahawks 3.5-point favorites, with a closing total of 40.5. That implied about 22.0 points for the Seahawks and 18.5 for the Cardinals.
Did Seahawks vs Cardinals go over or under the total?
The game went under. The consensus closing total was 40.5, and the teams combined for 38 points, 2.5 under the number.
Who covered the spread in Seahawks vs Cardinals?
The Seahawks covered by 20.5 against the closing line of Seahawks −3.5. The final margin was 24 points.
