Final2025 Week 2
Lambeau Field, Green Bay, WI|
Washington Commanders vs Green Bay Packers, Week 2 2025
Washington Commanders
Away
18
Green Bay Packers
HomeWon
27
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commanders | 0 | 3 | 0 | 15 | 18 |
| Packers | 7 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 27 |
WAS 18 · GB 27 Final
Passing leader
GB · QB
20.9PPR pts
19/31, 292 YDS, 2 TD
Top fantasy scorer
GB · TE
24.4PPR pts
6 REC, 124 YDS, 1 TD
Commanders leader
WAS · QB
19.7PPR pts
24/42, 200 YDS, 2 TD
Defensive playmaker
Dorance Armstrong
WAS
1 SACK, 6 TKL
Packers 27, Commanders 18: Green Bay beats Washington
Green Bay led 14–3 at halftime and won 27–18, though Washington took the second half 15–13. The Packers finished with a 404–230 edge in total offense and averaged 6.4 yards per play.
The Commanders went 5-for-16 on third down, while the Packers kept the ball for 32:26 and finished without a giveaway.
Key advantages
- +2.9 yards/play GB 6.4 · WAS 3.5
- +174 total yards GB 404 · WAS 230
- +11% third-down rate GB 42% · WAS 31%
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Commander or Packer on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Packers Won
Green Bay won the efficiency, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Commanders | Stat | Packers |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5 | Yards per play | 6.4 |
| 230 | Total yards | 404 |
| 31% | Third-down conversion | 42% |
| Other team stats | ||
| 65 | Plays | 63 |
| 0 | Turnovers | 0 |
| 27:34 | Time of possession | 32:26 |
Scoring Summary
The Packers scored three touchdowns and two field goals; the Commanders scored two touchdowns and one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | WAS | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 4:33 | GB | Jordan Love → Romeo Doubs, 5-yard TD Takes leadBrandon McManus XP | 0 | 7 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 7:34 | GB | Josh Jacobs 2-yard TD run Extends leadBrandon McManus XP | 0 | 14 |
| 4:27 | WAS | Matt Gay 51-yard FG | 3 | 14 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 6:37 | GB | Brandon McManus 22-yard FG Extends lead | 3 | 17 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 13:45 | WAS | Jayden Daniels → Zach Ertz, 20-yard TDMatt Gay XP | 10 | 17 |
| 8:57 | GB | Jordan Love → Tucker Kraft, 8-yard TD Extends leadBrandon McManus XP | 10 | 24 |
| 6:42 | GB | Brandon McManus 56-yard FG Extends lead | 10 | 27 |
| 2:53 | WAS | Jayden Daniels → Deebo Samuel, 10-yard TDJayden Daniels → Luke McCaffrey, 2-pt conversion | 18 | 27 |
Fantasy Points: Commanders vs Packers, Week 2 2025
Fantasy leaders
- Tucker KraftGB · TE24.4 PTSTE1
- Jordan LoveGB · QB20.9 PTSQB13
- Jayden DanielsWAS · QB19.7 PTSQB16
- Zach ErtzWAS · TE18.4 PTSTE2
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.9 | QB13 | 19/31 | 292 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 113.9 | Start/Sit → | |
| 19.7 | QB16 | 24/42 | 200 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 17 | 0 | 85.4 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.4 | TE1 | TE | — | — | — | 7 | 6 | 124 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 18.4 | TE2 | TE | — | — | — | 8 | 6 | 64 | 1 | ||
| 17.4 | WR17 | WR | — | — | — | 8 | 7 | 44 | 1 | ||
| 14.4 | RB21 | RB | 23 | 84 | 1 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 11.8 | WR35 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 28 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.8 | WR47 | WR | — | — | — | 9 | 5 | 48 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.4 | WR59 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 44 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.7 | RB45 | RB | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 27 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.2 | TE32 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 32 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.9 | WR81 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.7 | WR82 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 37 | 0 | ||
| 4.4 | RB49 | RB | 8 | 17 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.4 | WR103 | WR | 2 | 24 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 1.9 | WR107 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 1 | 9 | 0 | ||
| 1.7 | RB64 | RB | 4 | 17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.7 | TE49 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.5 | WR114 | WR | 2 | 15 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.2 | WR119 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Washington Commanders
Snap Share
Terry McLaurinWR63 snaps91%
Zach ErtzTE62 snaps90%
Deebo SamuelWR61 snaps88%
Austin EkelerRB36 snaps52%
Jaylin LaneWR36 snaps52%
Target Share40 targets
- Terry McLaurin23%, 9 targets
- Zach Ertz20%, 8 targets
- Deebo Samuel20%, 8 targets
- Noah Brown10%, 4 targets
- Austin Ekeler10%, 4 targets
- Other18%, 7 targets
Carry Share19 carries
- Austin Ekeler42%, 8 carries
- Jayden Daniels37%, 7 carries
- Jacory Croskey-Merritt21%, 4 carries
Green Bay Packers
Snap Share
Tucker KraftTE62 snaps91%
Josh JacobsRB53 snaps78%
Romeo DoubsWR50 snaps74%
Matthew GoldenWR40 snaps59%
Dontayvion WicksWR37 snaps54%
Target Share27 targets
- Tucker Kraft26%, 7 targets
- Dontayvion Wicks22%, 6 targets
- Romeo Doubs19%, 5 targets
- Chris Brooks15%, 4 targets
- Luke Musgrave7%, 2 targets
- Other11%, 3 targets
Carry Share30 carries
- Josh Jacobs77%, 23 carries
- Jordan Love10%, 3 carries
- Savion Williams7%, 2 carries
- Matthew Golden7%, 2 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 63 | 91% | 9 | 23% | 0 | |
| 62 | 91% | 7 | 26% | 0 | |
| 62 | 90% | 8 | 20% | 0 | |
| 61 | 88% | 8 | 20% | 0 | |
| 53 | 78% | 0 | 0% | 23 | |
| 50 | 74% | 5 | 19% | 0 | |
| 40 | 59% | 2 | 7% | 2 | |
| 37 | 54% | 6 | 22% | 0 | |
| 36 | 52% | 4 | 10% | 8 | |
| 36 | 52% | 4 | 10% | 0 | |
| 27 | 39% | 4 | 10% | 0 | |
| 22 | 32% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 21 | 31% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 21 | 31% | 2 | 7% | 0 | |
| 16 | 23% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 16 | 23% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 15 | 22% | 1 | 3% | 4 | |
| 13 | 19% | 4 | 15% | 0 | |
| 11 | 16% | 0 | 0% | 2 | |
| 9 | 13% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 5 | 7% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 5 | 7% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 3 | 4% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 1 | 1% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+12.5Tucker Kraft24.4 PTS vs 11.9 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−7.6Austin Ekeler4.4 PTS vs 12.0 xFP
- Highest expected volume23.2 xFPJayden Daniels19.7 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jayden DanielsWAS · QB | 19.7 | 23.2 | −3.5 | 100% | 42 att | — | 42 | 7 | 37% | 0 | 0% |
| Jordan LoveGB · QB | 20.9 | 15.7 | +5.2 | 100% | 31 att | — | 31 | 3 | 10% | 0 | 0% |
| Terry McLaurinWAS · WR | 9.8 | 15.3 | −5.5 | 91% | 23% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 9 | 23% |
| Josh JacobsGB · RB | 14.4 | 14.8 | −0.4 | 78% | 77% car | — | 0 | 23 | 77% | 0 | 0% |
| Deebo Samuel Sr.WAS · WR | 17.4 | 13.6 | +3.8 | 88% | 20% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 20% |
| Zach ErtzWAS · TE | 18.4 | 13.6 | +4.8 | 90% | 20% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 20% |
| Austin EkelerWAS · RB | 4.4 | 12.0 | −7.6 | 52% | 42% car | — | 0 | 8 | 42% | 4 | 10% |
| Tucker KraftGB · TE | 24.4 | 11.9 | +12.5 | 91% | 26% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 26% |
| Dontayvion WicksGB · WR | 8.4 | 10.2 | −1.8 | 54% | 22% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 22% |
| Romeo DoubsGB · WR | 11.8 | 8.5 | +3.3 | 74% | 19% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 19% |
| Chris BrooksGB · RB | 5.7 | 6.8 | −1.1 | 19% | 15% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 15% |
| Jaylin LaneWAS · WR | 1.2 | 6.8 | −5.6 | 52% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 10% |
| Noah BrownWAS · WR | 1.9 | 6.8 | −4.9 | 39% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 10% |
| Matthew GoldenGB · WR | 1.5 | 4.7 | −3.2 | 59% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 2 | 7% | 2 | 7% |
| Jacory Croskey-MerrittWAS · RB | 1.7 | 4.3 | −2.6 | 22% | 21% car | — | 0 | 4 | 21% | 1 | 3% |
| Luke MusgraveGB · TE | 5.2 | 3.4 | +1.8 | 31% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Ben SinnottWAS · TE | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 4% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Luke McCaffreyWAS · WR | 4.9 | 1.7 | +3.2 | 23% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Malik HeathGB · WR | 4.7 | 1.7 | +3.0 | 32% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Savion WilliamsGB · WR | 2.4 | 1.3 | +1.1 | 16% | 7% car | — | 0 | 2 | 7% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Commanders 40 targets and 19 carries; Packers 27 targets and 30 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2025 season: 1.70 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.65 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Jayden Daniels
WAS · QB · 19.7 pts on 23.2 expected
24 of 42 passing for 200 yards, 2 touchdowns; 7 carries for 17 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 23.2 expected.
Start/Sit: Jayden Daniels →Jordan Love Ran hot
GB · QB · 20.9 pts on 15.7 expected
19 of 31 passing for 292 yards, 2 touchdowns; 3 carries for 12 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 15.7 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Start/Sit: Jordan Love →Terry McLaurin Unlucky
WAS · WR · 9.8 pts on 15.3 expected
9 targets (23% of the team's), 5 catches for 48 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 15.3 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Trend: Season high in targets (9).
Deebo Samuel Sr.
WAS · WR · 17.4 pts on 13.6 expected
8 targets (20% of the team's), 7 catches for 44 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 13.6 expected.
Josh Jacobs Volume, no payoff
GB · RB · 14.4 pts on 14.8 expected
23 carries (77% of the team's) for 84 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 14.8 expected.
Trend: Season high in carries (23).
Tucker Kraft Ran hot
GB · TE · 24.4 pts on 11.9 expected
7 targets (26% of the team's), 6 catches for 124 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 11.9 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Trend: Season high in targets (7).
Austin Ekeler Unlucky
WAS · RB · 4.4 pts on 12.0 expected
4 targets (10% of the team's), 2 catches for 7 yards; 8 carries (42% of the team's) for 17 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 12.0 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Start/Sit: Austin Ekeler →Jaylin Lane Unlucky
WAS · WR · 1.2 pts on 6.8 expected
4 targets (10% of the team's), 1 catch for 2 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 6.8 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Start/Sit: Jaylin Lane →Stock Up, Stock Down
Washington Commanders
- ▲Stock up: Zach Ertz played 90% of the snaps, up from a 64% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Jaylin Lane played 52% of the snaps, up from a 30% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Luke McCaffrey played 23% of the snaps, up from a 7% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2025 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Commanders D | Packers D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 19.9 | 15.2 |
| RBs | 24.8 | 21.1 |
| WRs | 34.9 | 31.0 |
| TEs | 15.8 | 12.1 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Green Bay opened at 50% win probability and passed 98% in the fourth quarter on the way to the win.
Packers win probability
Key Swings
- +22Love → Doubs, 5-yd TD50% → 72%Q1 4:33
- +16Jacobs 2-yd TD run74% → 91%Q2 7:34
- −6Gay 51-yd FG91% → 86%Q2 4:27
- −12Daniels → Ertz, 20-yd TD98% → 86%Q4 13:45
- +9Love → Kraft, 8-yd TD91% → >99%Q4 8:57
Swing in Packers win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Washington Commanders | Measure | Green Bay Packers |
|---|---|---|
| 65 | Plays | 63 |
| 71% | Pass rate | 52% |
| 3.9 | Yds / dropback | 8.2 |
| 2.7 | Yds / carry | 4.5 |
| 5/16 | Third downs | 5/12 |
Efficiency edge Green Bay ran 2 fewer plays but gained 4.3 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- WAS McLaurin 23% · Samuel 20% · Ertz 20%
- GB Kraft 26% · Wicks 22% · Doubs 19%
Possession Results
| Result | WAS | GB |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 2 | 3 |
| Field goals | 1 | 2 |
| Punts | 4 | 4 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 0 |
| Turnovers on downs | 2 | 1 |
| Missed field goals | 2 | 1 |
- The Packers opened the scoring on their second possession, a 7-play, 96-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
- The Packers drained the clock with two second-half drives of four to six minutes.
All 23 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB | Q1 15:00 | 9 | 39 | 4:35 | Downs |
| WAS | Q1 10:25 | 3 | 6 | 2:17 | Punt |
| GB | Q1 8:08 | 7 | 96 | 3:35 | Touchdown |
| WAS | Q1 4:33 | 3 | -5 | 2:33 | Punt |
| GB | Q1 2:00 | 3 | 6 | 2:11 | Punt |
| WAS | Q2 14:49 | 6 | 12 | 2:25 | Punt |
| GB | Q2 12:24 | 10 | 92 | 4:50 | Touchdown |
| WAS | Q2 7:34 | 9 | 37 | 3:07 | Field goal |
| GB | Q2 4:27 | 3 | -1 | 2:25 | Punt |
| WAS | Q2 2:02 | 6 | 17 | 1:48 | Missed FG |
| GB | Q2 0:14 | 3 | 22 | 0:14 | Missed FG |
| WAS | Q3 15:00 | 7 | 10 | 3:06 | Missed FG |
| GB | Q3 11:54 | 10 | 54 | 5:17 | Field goal |
| WAS | Q3 6:37 | 3 | 7 | 1:33 | Punt |
| GB | Q3 5:04 | 3 | 2 | 1:33 | Punt |
| WAS | Q3 3:31 | 11 | 50 | 4:46 | Touchdown |
| GB | Q4 13:45 | 9 | 65 | 4:48 | Touchdown |
| WAS | Q4 8:57 | 4 | 6 | 1:15 | Downs |
| GB | Q4 7:42 | 4 | 2 | 1:00 | Field goal |
| WAS | Q4 6:42 | 10 | 65 | 3:49 | Touchdown |
| GB | Q4 2:53 | 3 | -1 | 1:06 | Punt |
| WAS | Q4 1:47 | 6 | 13 | 0:55 | Downs |
| GB | Q4 0:52 | 2 | -2 | 0:52 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Commanders vs Packers Head-to-Head
The Commanders and Packers first met in 1932 and have played 41 times since.
- All-time series
- 23–17–1Packers lead, 41 meetings since 1932
- Postseason
- 2–1Packers won in 1936 and 2015; Commanders won in 1972
- Largest Commanders win
- 30–01949
- Largest Packers win
- 37–02001
Since 2021
2–1 Packers lead
3 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- P
- C
- P
Oldest to newest. P = Packers win, C = Commanders win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wk 2 Commanders at Packers GB 27 WAS 18 GB W
- 2022 Wk 7 Packers at Commanders, 2022 Wk 7 recap WAS 23 GB 21 WAS W
- 2021 Wk 7 Commanders at Packers, 2021 Wk 7 recap GB 24 WAS 10 GB W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2025 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Commanders | Stat | Packers |
|---|---|---|
| 5-12 | Record | 9-7-1 |
| 20.9 | Points per game | 23.0 |
| 318.8 | Yards per game | 332.6 |
| 5.5 | Yards per play | 5.6 |
| 26.5 | Points allowed per game | 21.2 |
| 384.3 | Yards allowed per game | 311.8 |
Commanders and Packers in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Commander or a Packer, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Commanders or Packers player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Commanders and Packers players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Commanders and Packers defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2025 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Commanders vs Packers Game FAQ
Who won the 2025 Commanders vs Packers Week 2 game?
The Green Bay Packers beat the Washington Commanders 27–18 in Week 2 of the 2025 season. The game was played at Lambeau Field in Green Bay, WI, on September 11, 2025. See the Packers' 2025 schedule.
What was the final score of Commanders vs Packers?
The final score was Packers 27, Commanders 18. The Packers led 14–3 at halftime, and the second half went Commanders 15, Packers 13.
What happened in the Commanders vs Packers game?
Green Bay led 14–3 at halftime and won 27–18, though Washington took the second half 15–13. The Packers finished with a 404–230 edge in total offense and averaged 6.4 yards per play. Tucker Kraft led all players with 6 catches for 124 yards and a touchdown.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Commanders vs Packers?
Tucker Kraft led the game with 24.4 PPR fantasy points, the TE1 of Week 2, on 6 catches for 124 yards and a touchdown. Jordan Love was next with 20.9 (QB13). See Tucker Kraft's 2025 game log.
Who led Commanders vs Packers in passing, rushing and receiving?
Jordan Love (GB) led all passers with 19 of 31 for 292 yards and 2 touchdowns. Josh Jacobs (GB) led in rushing with 23 carries for 84 yards and a touchdown. Tucker Kraft (GB) led in receiving with 6 catches for 124 yards and a touchdown.
How many fantasy points did Tucker Kraft score against the Commanders?
Tucker Kraft scored 24.4 points in PPR leagues, 21.4 in half-PPR and 18.4 in standard scoring against the Commanders in Week 2 of the 2025 season, on 6 catches for 124 yards and a touchdown. He drew 26% of his team's targets.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Commanders vs Packers?
Tucker Kraft outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 24.4 PPR points on 11.9 xFP (+12.5). Austin Ekeler fell furthest short, with 4.4 points on 12.0 xFP (−7.6). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Commanders vs Packers?
Jayden Daniels had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 23.2 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 19.7. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Packers beat the Commanders?
The Packers beat the Commanders 27–18 because they averaged 6.4 yards per play to 3.5 and outgained them 404–230.
What is the all-time Commanders vs Packers record?
The Packers lead the all-time series 23–17–1 across 41 meetings since 1932, including a 2–1 record in the postseason.
When did the Commanders and Packers last play before this game?
Before Week 2 of 2025, they last met in the 2022 season on October 23, 2022, when the Commanders beat the Packers 23–21.
Have the Commanders and Packers met in the playoffs?
Yes, 3 times, most recently in the 2015 playoffs. The Commanders are 1–2 against the Packers in the postseason.
What is the Commanders vs Packers record since 2021?
The Packers lead 2–1 across 3 meetings since the 2021 season, including this game.
