Final2022 Week 8
Lucas Oil Stadium, Indianapolis, IN|
Washington Commanders vs Indianapolis Colts, Week 8 2022
Washington Commanders
AwayWon
17
Indianapolis Colts
Home
16
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commanders | 0 | 7 | 0 | 10 | 17 |
| Colts | 0 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 16 |
WAS 17 · IND 16 Final
Passing leader
Taylor Heinicke
WAS · QB
23.1PPR pts
23/31, 279 YDS, 1 TD, 1 INT, 1 RUSH TD
Top fantasy scorer
Antonio Gibson
WAS · RB
20.7PPR pts
7 ATT, 19 YDS, 7 REC, 58 REC YDS, 1 REC TD
Colts leader
Nyheim Hines
IND
12.9PPR pts
5 ATT, 20 YDS, 1 TD, 2 REC, 29 REC YDS
Defensive playmaker
Shaquille Leonard
IND
1 INT, 4 TKL
Commanders 17, Colts 16: Washington holds off Indianapolis
Washington led 7–3 at halftime and won 17–16, though Indianapolis took the second half 13–10. The Commanders finished with a 362–324 edge in total offense.
The Colts went 5-for-12 on third down and committed two turnovers.
The two teams meet again in Week 4 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +1 turnover margin WAS 1 · IND 2 turnovers
- +38 total yards WAS 362 · IND 324
- +1:20 time of possession WAS 30:40 · IND 29:20
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Commander or Colt on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Commanders Won
Washington won the turnover and time of possession battles.
| Commanders | Stat | Colts |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Turnovers | 2 |
| 362 | Total yards | 324 |
| 30:40 | Time of possession | 29:20 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 5.9 | Yards per play | 6.0 |
| 61 | Plays | 54 |
| 17% | Third-down conversion | 42% |
Scoring Summary
The Commanders scored two touchdowns and one field goal; the Colts scored one touchdown and three field goals.
| Time | Team | Play | WAS | IND |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| No scoring | ||||
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 14:13 | IND | Chase McLaughlin 46-yard FG Takes lead | 0 | 3 |
| 10:55 | WAS | Taylor Heinicke → Antonio Gibson, 9-yard TD Takes leadJoey Slye XP | 7 | 3 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 7:13 | IND | Chase McLaughlin 39-yard FG | 7 | 6 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 12:32 | IND | Chase McLaughlin 20-yard FG Takes lead | 7 | 9 |
| 11:12 | IND | Nyheim Hines 6-yard TD run Extends leadChase McLaughlin XP | 7 | 16 |
| 4:55 | WAS | Joey Slye 28-yard FG | 10 | 16 |
| 0:22 | WAS | Taylor Heinicke 1-yard TD run Game winnerJoey Slye XP | 17 | 16 |
Fantasy Points: Commanders vs Colts, Week 8 2022
Fantasy leaders
- Taylor HeinickeWAS · QB23.1 PTSQB8
- Antonio GibsonWAS · RB20.7 PTSRB11
- Terry McLaurinWAS · WR16.6 PTSWR17
- Nyheim Miller-HinesIND · RB12.9 PTSRB24
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.1 | QB8 | 23/31 | 279 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 29 | 1 | 98.7 | ||
| 7.5 | QB28 | 17/23 | 201 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 15 | 0 | 100.1 |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.7 | RB11 | RB | 7 | 19 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 58 | 1 | ||
| 16.6 | WR17 | WR | 1 | -7 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 113 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 12.9 | RB24 | RB | 5 | 20 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 29 | 0 | ||
| 12.3 | WR33 | WR | — | — | — | 9 | 7 | 53 | 0 | ||
| 10.9 | WR38 | WR | 4 | 29 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 50 | 0 | ||
| 9.5 | WR45 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 65 | 0 | ||
| 9.1 | WR46 | WR | 1 | 28 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 43 | 0 | ||
| 5.6 | RB46 | RB | 16 | 76 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.0 | RB49 | RB | 2 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 14 | 0 | ||
| 4.1 | TE29 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 11 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.1 | WR73 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 21 | 0 | ||
| 2.3 | TE41 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 13 | 0 | ||
| 2.0 | RB63 | RB | 8 | 20 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 1.6 | TE49 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.4 | WR91 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| -0.4 | — | RB | 1 | -4 | 0 | — | — | — | — |
Fantasy Usage
Washington Commanders
Snap Share
Terry McLaurinWR58 snaps95%
Cam SimsWR49 snaps80%
Curtis SamuelWR45 snaps74%
Logan ThomasTE34 snaps56%
J.D. McKissicRB22 snaps36%
Target Share30 targets
- Terry McLaurin27%, 8 targets
- Antonio Gibson23%, 7 targets
- J.D. McKissic17%, 5 targets
- Curtis Samuel13%, 4 targets
- Cam Sims7%, 2 targets
- Other13%, 4 targets
Carry Share28 carries
- Brian Robinson29%, 8 carries
- Antonio Gibson25%, 7 carries
- Taylor Heinicke21%, 6 carries
- Curtis Samuel14%, 4 carries
- J.D. McKissic7%, 2 carries
- Other4%, 1 carries
Indianapolis Colts
Snap Share
Michael PittmanWR55 snaps95%
Parris CampbellWR46 snaps79%
Jonathan TaylorRB40 snaps69%
Alec PierceWR33 snaps57%
Kylen GransonTE32 snaps55%
Target Share23 targets
- Michael Pittman39%, 9 targets
- Alec Pierce22%, 5 targets
- Kylen Granson13%, 3 targets
- Nyheim Miller-Hines9%, 2 targets
- Parris Campbell9%, 2 targets
- Other9%, 2 targets
Carry Share29 carries
- Jonathan Taylor55%, 16 carries
- Sam Ehlinger21%, 6 carries
- Nyheim Miller-Hines17%, 5 carries
- Parris Campbell3%, 1 carries
- Deon Jackson3%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58 | 95% | 8 | 27% | 1 | |
| 55 | 95% | 9 | 39% | 0 | |
| 49 | 80% | 2 | 7% | 0 | |
| 46 | 79% | 2 | 9% | 1 | |
| 45 | 74% | 4 | 13% | 4 | |
| 40 | 69% | 1 | 4% | 16 | |
| 33 | 57% | 5 | 22% | 0 | |
| 34 | 56% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 32 | 55% | 3 | 13% | 0 | |
| 29 | 50% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 21 | 36% | 2 | 9% | 5 | |
| 22 | 36% | 5 | 17% | 2 | |
| 22 | 36% | 7 | 23% | 7 | |
| 22 | 36% | 2 | 7% | 0 | |
| 20 | 33% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 17 | 29% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 15 | 26% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 15 | 25% | 0 | 0% | 8 | |
| 9 | 15% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 9 | 15% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 2 | 3% | 0 | 0% | 1 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+6.4Nyheim Hines12.9 PTS vs 6.5 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−6.4Jonathan Taylor5.6 PTS vs 12.0 xFP
- Highest expected volume17.0 xFPTaylor Heinicke23.1 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor HeinickeWAS · QB | 23.1 | 17.0 | +6.1 | 100% | 31 att | — | 31 | 6 | 21% | 0 | 0% |
| Antonio GibsonWAS · RB | 20.7 | 16.2 | +4.5 | 36% | 25% car | — | 0 | 7 | 25% | 7 | 23% |
| Michael Pittman Jr.IND · WR | 12.3 | 15.0 | −2.7 | 95% | 39% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 9 | 39% |
| Terry McLaurinWAS · WR | 16.6 | 14.0 | +2.6 | 95% | 27% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 8 | 27% |
| Sam EhlingerIND · QB | 7.5 | 13.6 | −6.1 | 100% | 23 att | — | 23 | 6 | 21% | 0 | 0% |
| Jonathan TaylorIND · RB | 5.6 | 12.0 | −6.4 | 69% | 55% car | — | 0 | 16 | 55% | 1 | 4% |
| J.D. McKissicWAS · RB | 5.0 | 9.6 | −4.6 | 36% | 17% tgt | — | 0 | 2 | 7% | 5 | 17% |
| Curtis SamuelWAS · WR | 10.9 | 9.2 | +1.7 | 74% | 14% car | — | 0 | 4 | 14% | 4 | 13% |
| Alec PierceIND · WR | 9.5 | 8.3 | +1.2 | 57% | 22% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 22% |
| Nyheim HinesIND · — | 12.9 | 6.5 | +6.4 | — | 17% car | — | 0 | 5 | 17% | 2 | 9% |
| Brian Robinson Jr.WAS · RB | 2.0 | 5.1 | −3.1 | 25% | 29% car | — | 0 | 8 | 29% | 0 | 0% |
| Kylen GransonIND · TE | 4.1 | 5.0 | −0.9 | 55% | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 13% |
| Parris CampbellIND · WR | 9.1 | 4.0 | +5.1 | 79% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 2 | 9% |
| Armani RogersWAS · TE | 2.3 | 3.3 | −1.0 | 36% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Cam SimsWAS · WR | 3.1 | 3.3 | −0.2 | 80% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Dax MilneWAS · WR | 1.4 | 1.7 | −0.3 | 15% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| John BatesWAS · TE | 1.6 | 1.7 | −0.1 | 33% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Mo Alie-CoxIND · TE | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 50% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Deon JacksonIND · RB | -0.4 | 0.6 | −1.0 | 3% | 3% car | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Commanders 30 targets and 28 carries; Colts 23 targets and 29 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2022 season: 1.67 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.64 per carry and 0.42 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Taylor Heinicke Ran hot
WAS · QB · 23.1 pts on 17.0 expected
23 of 31 passing for 279 yards, 1 touchdown, 1 interception; 6 carries for 29 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 17.0 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Sam Ehlinger Unlucky
IND · QB · 7.5 pts on 13.6 expected
17 of 23 passing for 201 yards; 6 carries for 15 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 13.6 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Antonio Gibson
WAS · RB · 20.7 pts on 16.2 expected
7 targets (23% of the team's), 7 catches for 58 yards and 1 touchdown; 7 carries (25% of the team's) for 19 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 16.2 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 11.0, 9.3, 6.9, 8.3, 16.7, 20.7
W3W4W5W6W7W8
Best fantasy game of the season.
Terry McLaurin
WAS · WR · 16.6 pts on 14.0 expected
8 targets (27% of the team's), 6 catches for 113 yards; 1 carry (4% of the team's) for -7 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 14.0 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 16.2, 3.5, 12.6, 8.2, 18.3, 16.6
W3W4W5W6W7W8
Michael Pittman Jr. Volume, no payoff
IND · WR · 12.3 pts on 15.0 expected
9 targets (39% of the team's), 7 catches for 53 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 15.0 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 15.2, 6.1, 10.9, 26.4, 9.8, 12.3
W3W4W5W6W7W8
Jonathan Taylor Unlucky
IND · RB · 5.6 pts on 12.0 expected
1 target (4% of the team's), 0 catches for 0 yards; 16 carries (55% of the team's) for 76 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 12.0 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 27.5, 7.3, 12.1, 3.3, 15.5, 5.6
W1W2W3W4W7W8
Nyheim Hines Ran hot
IND · — · 12.9 pts on 6.5 expected
2 targets (9% of the team's), 2 catches for 29 yards; 5 carries (17% of the team's) for 20 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 6.5 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Parris Campbell Ran hot
IND · WR · 9.1 pts on 4.0 expected
2 targets (9% of the team's), 2 catches for 43 yards; 1 carry (3% of the team's) for 28 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 4.0 points; efficiency supplied the rest.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 3.0, 8.3, 4.2, 18.7, 23.0, 9.1
W3W4W5W6W7W8
Stock Up, Stock Down
Washington Commanders
- ▲Stock up: Armani Rogers played 36% of the snaps, up from a 19% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Cam Sims played 80% of the snaps, up from a 34% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Brian Robinson Jr. played 25% of the snaps, down from a 41% season average.
Indianapolis Colts
- ▼Stock down: Deon Jackson played 3% of the snaps, down from a 34% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2022 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Commanders D | Colts D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 16.6 | 18.0 |
| RBs | 17.2 | 24.9 |
| WRs | 32.1 | 29.9 |
| TEs | 9.1 | 11.8 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Indianapolis opened at 59% win probability, climbed as high as >99%, then lost.
Colts win probability
Key Swings
- −24Heinicke → Gibson, 9-yd TD67% → 43%Q2 10:55
- +14McLaughlin 39-yd FG36% → 51%Q3 7:13
- +19McLaughlin 20-yd FG48% → 66%Q4 12:32
- +28Hines 6-yd TD run67% → 95%Q4 11:12
- −82Heinicke 1-yd TD run>99% → 18%Q4 0:22
Swing in Colts win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Washington Commanders | Measure | Indianapolis Colts |
|---|---|---|
| 61 | Plays | 54 |
| 54% | Pass rate | 46% |
| 8.1 | Yds / dropback | 7.6 |
| 3.4 | Yds / carry | 4.7 |
| 2/12 | Third downs | 5/12 |
Efficiency edge Washington ran 7 more plays and gained 0.5 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- WAS McLaurin 27% · Gibson 23% · McKissic 17%
- IND Pittman 39% · Pierce 22% · Granson 13%
Possession Results
| Result | WAS | IND |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 2 | 1 |
| Field goals | 1 | 3 |
| Punts | 6 | 4 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 2 |
| Turnovers on downs | 1 | 0 |
WAS turnover edge: +1
- The Colts opened the scoring on their third possession, a 11-play, 64-yard drive that ended in a field goal.
All 23 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IND | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 8 | 1:24 | Punt |
| WAS | Q1 13:36 | 4 | 20 | 2:41 | Punt |
| IND | Q1 10:55 | 3 | 5 | 1:34 | Punt |
| WAS | Q1 9:21 | 7 | 25 | 4:04 | Punt |
| IND | Q1 5:17 | 11 | 64 | 6:04 | Field goal |
| WAS | Q2 14:13 | 6 | 75 | 3:18 | Touchdown |
| IND | Q2 10:55 | 4 | 17 | 1:31 | Punt |
| WAS | Q2 9:24 | 5 | 29 | 3:13 | Punt |
| IND | Q2 6:11 | 6 | 58 | 3:36 | Fumble |
| WAS | Q2 2:35 | 6 | 20 | 2:10 | Punt |
| IND | Q2 0:25 | 1 | -1 | 0:25 | End of half |
| WAS | Q3 15:00 | 6 | 25 | 2:49 | Downs |
| IND | Q3 12:11 | 10 | 29 | 4:58 | Field goal |
| WAS | Q3 7:13 | 3 | 5 | 1:27 | Punt |
| IND | Q3 5:46 | 4 | 57 | 2:19 | Fumble |
| WAS | Q3 3:27 | 3 | -8 | 2:15 | Punt |
| IND | Q3 1:12 | 7 | 60 | 3:40 | Field goal |
| WAS | Q4 12:32 | 1 | 0 | 0:09 | Interception |
| IND | Q4 12:23 | 2 | 24 | 1:11 | Touchdown |
| WAS | Q4 11:12 | 12 | 82 | 6:17 | Field goal |
| IND | Q4 4:55 | 3 | 9 | 2:16 | Punt |
| WAS | Q4 2:39 | 9 | 89 | 2:17 | Touchdown |
| IND | Q4 0:22 | 3 | 13 | 0:22 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Commanders vs Colts Head-to-Head
The Commanders and Colts first met in 1953 and have played 32 times since.
- All-time series
- 21–11Colts lead, 32 meetings since 1953
- Postseason
- 0No playoff meetings
- Largest Commanders win
- 35–71984
- Largest Colts win
- 38–71965
Since 2021
1–0 Commanders lead
1 meeting since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- WAS
Oldest to newest. WAS = Commanders win, IND = Colts win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 4 Colts vs Commanders Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2022 Wk 8 Commanders at Colts WAS 17 IND 16 WAS W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2022 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Commanders | Stat | Colts |
|---|---|---|
| 8-8-1 | Record | 4-12-1 |
| 18.9 | Points per game | 17.0 |
| 330.3 | Yards per game | 311.6 |
| 4.9 | Yards per play | 4.8 |
| 20.2 | Points allowed per game | 25.1 |
| 304.6 | Yards allowed per game | 334.0 |
Commanders vs Colts Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- IND −3Colts failed to cover by 4
- Total
- 40Under: 33 points scored (by 7)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colts | 21.5 | 16 | −5.5 |
| Commanders | 18.5 | 17 | −1.5 |
Both offenses finished under the market's expectation, which matches the low fantasy output in the Fantasy tab.
Betting Trends
Each team's 2022 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Washington Commanders
- Against the spread
- 4–4
- Over/under
- 3–5
- ATS as favorite
- 2–2
- ATS as underdog
- 2–2
- ATS on the road
- 2–2
Indianapolis Colts
- Against the spread
- 3–5
- Over/under
- 1–7
- ATS as favorite
- 1–4
- ATS as underdog
- 2–1
- ATS at home
- 2–2
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Commanders vs Colts Fantasy Outlook for 2026
One meeting is left on the 2026 schedule: Week 4 in London. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Commanders or Colts player start in Week 4? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Commanders and Colts players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Commanders and Colts defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere this matchup falls in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2022 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Commanders vs Colts Game FAQ
Who won the 2022 Commanders vs Colts Week 8 game?
The Washington Commanders beat the Indianapolis Colts 17–16 in Week 8 of the 2022 season. The game was played at Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis, IN, on October 30, 2022. See the Commanders' 2022 schedule.
What was the final score of Commanders vs Colts?
The final score was Commanders 17, Colts 16. The Commanders led 7–3 at halftime, and the second half went Commanders 10, Colts 13.
What happened in the Commanders vs Colts game?
Washington led 7–3 at halftime and won 17–16, though Indianapolis took the second half 13–10. The Commanders finished with a 362–324 edge in total offense. Taylor Heinicke led all players with 23 of 31 passing for 279 yards and a touchdown, plus 6 carries for 29 rushing yards and a touchdown. The Colts committed 2 turnovers, the Commanders 1.
What was the game-winning score in Commanders vs Colts?
Taylor Heinicke's 1-yard touchdown run with 0:22 left in the fourth quarter gave the Commanders a 17–16 lead they never gave up. It was the final score of the game.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Commanders vs Colts?
Taylor Heinicke led the game with 23.1 PPR fantasy points, the QB8 of Week 8, on 23 of 31 passing for 279 yards and a touchdown, plus 6 carries for 29 rushing yards and a touchdown. Antonio Gibson was next with 20.7 (RB11).
Who led Commanders vs Colts in passing, rushing and receiving?
Taylor Heinicke (WAS) led all passers with 23 of 31 for 279 yards, a touchdown and an interception. Jonathan Taylor (IND) led in rushing with 16 carries for 76 yards. Terry McLaurin (WAS) led in receiving with 6 catches for 113 yards.
How many fantasy points did Taylor Heinicke score against the Colts?
Taylor Heinicke scored 23.1 fantasy points against the Colts in Week 8 of the 2022 season, the same in PPR, half-PPR and standard scoring because he had no catches, on 23 of 31 passing for 279 yards and a touchdown, plus 6 carries for 29 rushing yards and a touchdown.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Commanders vs Colts?
Nyheim Hines outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 12.9 PPR points on 6.5 xFP (+6.4). Jonathan Taylor fell furthest short, with 5.6 points on 12.0 xFP (−6.4). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
How did the Commanders come back to beat the Colts?
The Commanders' chances of winning fell as low as <1% in the fourth quarter. Taylor Heinicke's 1-yard touchdown run in the fourth quarter was the biggest swing of the game. Taylor Heinicke's 1-yard touchdown run then put them ahead for good.
Which team won the turnover battle in Commanders vs Colts?
The Commanders won the turnover battle 2–1: the Colts gave the ball away 2 times and the Commanders 1 time. The Commanders won the game.
What is the all-time Commanders vs Colts record?
The Colts lead the all-time series 21–11 across 32 meetings since 1953.
When did the Commanders and Colts last play before this game?
Before Week 8 of 2022, they last met in the 2018 season on September 16, 2018, when the Colts beat the Commanders 21–9.
What was the closing spread for Commanders vs Colts?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Colts −3, making the Indianapolis Colts 3-point favorites, with a closing total of 40. That implied about 21.5 points for the Colts and 18.5 for the Commanders.
Did Commanders vs Colts go over or under the total?
The game went under. The consensus closing total was 40, and the teams combined for 33 points, 7 under the number.
Who covered the spread in Commanders vs Colts?
The Commanders covered as 3-point underdogs against the closing line of Colts −3. The final margin was 1 point.
