Final2026 Week 2
SoFi Stadium, Inglewood, CA|
Los Angeles Rams vs New York Giants
New York Giants
Away
6
Los Angeles Rams
HomeWon
28
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giants | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| Rams | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 28 |
NYG 6 · LAR 28 Final
Passing leader
LAR · QB
28.0PPR pts
22/31, 327 YDS, 4 TD, 1 INT
Top fantasy scorer
LAR · WR
39.5PPR pts
8 REC, 195 YDS, 2 TD
Giants leader
NYG · RB
9.5PPR pts
12 ATT, 36 YDS, 4 REC, 19 REC YDS
Defensive playmaker
Jevon Holland
NYG
1 INT, 8 TKL
Rams 28, Giants 6: Los Angeles leads from start to finish
Los Angeles led 14–3 at halftime and outscored New York 14–3 after the break to win 28–6. The Rams finished with a 481–182 edge in total offense and averaged 8.0 yards per play.
The Giants went 3-for-14 on third down and committed one turnover, while the Rams kept the ball for 32:35.
Key advantages
- +4.7 yards/play LAR 8.0 · NYG 3.3
- +299 total yards LAR 481 · NYG 182
- +35% third-down rate LAR 56% · NYG 21%
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Giant or Ram on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Rams Won
Los Angeles won the efficiency, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Giants | Stat | Rams |
|---|---|---|
| 3.3 | Yards per play | 8.0 |
| 182 | Total yards | 481 |
| 21% | Third-down conversion | 56% |
| Other team stats | ||
| 55 | Plays | 60 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 2 |
| 27:25 | Time of possession | 32:35 |
Scoring Summary
The Rams scored four touchdowns; the Giants scored two field goals.
| Time | Team | Play | NYG | LAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 0:11 | LAR | Matthew Stafford → Davante Adams, 31-yard TD Takes leadHarrison Mevis XP | 0 | 7 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 11:07 | LAR | Matthew Stafford → Kyren Williams, 10-yard TD Extends leadHarrison Mevis XP | 0 | 14 |
| 0:25 | NYG | Dominic Zvada 24-yard FG | 3 | 14 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 6:21 | LAR | Matthew Stafford → Davante Adams, 11-yard TD Extends leadHarrison Mevis XP | 3 | 21 |
| 3:49 | NYG | Dominic Zvada 52-yard FG | 6 | 21 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 8:57 | LAR | Matthew Stafford → Terrance Ferguson, 5-yard TD Extends leadHarrison Mevis XP | 6 | 28 |
Fantasy Points: Giants vs Rams, Week 2 2026
Fantasy leaders
- Davante AdamsLAR · WR39.5 PTSWR2
- Matthew StaffordLAR · QB28.0 PTSQB6
- Terrance FergusonLAR · TE17.4 PTSTE8
- Kyren WilliamsLAR · RB15.7 PTSRB8
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28.0 | QB6 | 22/31 | 327 | 4 | 1 | 4 | -1 | 0 | 131.3 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.5 | QB32 | 11/27 | 111 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 37.7 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.8 | QB36 | 3/5 | 20 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | 68.8 |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39.5 | WR2 | WR | — | — | — | 10 | 8 | 195 | 2 | Start/Sit → | |
| 17.4 | TE8 | TE | — | — | — | 9 | 6 | 54 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 15.7 | RB8 | RB | 12 | 85 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 10.2 | RB24 | RB | 12 | 79 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.5 | RB27 | RB | 12 | 36 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 19 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.3 | TE19 | TE | — | — | — | 10 | 5 | 33 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.8 | WR54 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 48 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.0 | WR73 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 2 | 30 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.5 | TE32 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.9 | WR89 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 19 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.2 | WR95 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 12 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.7 | TE50 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.1 | WR116 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.9 | RB75 | RB | 3 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.6 | RB79 | RB | 4 | 6 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
New York Giants
Snap Share
Malachi FieldsWR47 snaps81%
Malik NabersWR43 snaps74%
Darnell MooneyWR42 snaps72%
Isaiah LikelyTE40 snaps69%
Cam SkatteboRB34 snaps59%
Target Share32 targets
- Isaiah Likely31%, 10 targets
- Malachi Fields19%, 6 targets
- Theo Johnson13%, 4 targets
- Malik Nabers13%, 4 targets
- Cam Skattebo13%, 4 targets
- Other13%, 4 targets
Carry Share21 carries
- Cam Skattebo57%, 12 carries
- Najee Harris19%, 4 carries
- Devin Singletary14%, 3 carries
- Jameis Winston10%, 2 carries
Los Angeles Rams
Snap Share
Colby ParkinsonTE44 snaps71%
Konata MumpfieldWR43 snaps69%
Davante AdamsWR40 snaps65%
Terrance FergusonTE36 snaps58%
Kyren WilliamsRB34 snaps55%
Target Share30 targets
- Davante Adams33%, 10 targets
- Terrance Ferguson30%, 9 targets
- Colby Parkinson7%, 2 targets
- Tutu Atwell7%, 2 targets
- Kyren Williams7%, 2 targets
- Other17%, 5 targets
Carry Share28 carries
- Kyren Williams43%, 12 carries
- Blake Corum43%, 12 carries
- Matthew Stafford14%, 4 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47 | 81% | 6 | 19% | 0 | |
| 43 | 74% | 4 | 13% | 0 | |
| 42 | 72% | 3 | 9% | 0 | |
| 44 | 71% | 2 | 7% | 0 | |
| 43 | 69% | 2 | 7% | 0 | |
| 40 | 69% | 10 | 31% | 0 | |
| 40 | 65% | 10 | 33% | 0 | |
| 34 | 59% | 4 | 13% | 12 | |
| 36 | 58% | 9 | 30% | 0 | |
| 34 | 55% | 2 | 7% | 12 | |
| 32 | 52% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 28 | 45% | 1 | 3% | 12 | |
| 26 | 42% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 18 | 31% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 18 | 31% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 16 | 28% | 4 | 13% | 0 | |
| 15 | 26% | 1 | 3% | 3 | |
| 16 | 26% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 11 | 18% | 2 | 7% | 0 | |
| 8 | 14% | 0 | 0% | 4 | |
| 5 | 9% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 3 | 5% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+22.0Davante Adams39.5 PTS vs 17.5 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−10.3Jameis Winston3.5 PTS vs 13.8 xFP
- Highest expected volume17.5 xFPDavante Adams39.5 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davante AdamsLAR · WR | 39.5 | 17.5 | +22.0 | 65% | 33% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 10 | 33% |
| Isaiah LikelyNYG · TE | 8.3 | 17.5 | −9.2 | 69% | 31% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 10 | 31% |
| Matthew StaffordLAR · QB | 28.0 | 16.9 | +11.1 | 100% | 31 att | — | 31 | 4 | 14% | 0 | 0% |
| Terrance FergusonLAR · TE | 17.4 | 15.7 | +1.7 | 58% | 30% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 9 | 30% |
| Cam SkatteboNYG · RB | 9.5 | 14.2 | −4.7 | 59% | 57% car | — | 0 | 12 | 57% | 4 | 13% |
| Jameis WinstonNYG · QB | 3.5 | 13.8 | −10.3 | 88% | 27 att | — | 27 | 2 | 10% | 0 | 0% |
| Kyren WilliamsLAR · RB | 15.7 | 10.7 | +5.0 | 55% | 43% car | — | 0 | 12 | 43% | 2 | 7% |
| Malachi FieldsNYG · WR | 5.0 | 10.5 | −5.5 | 81% | 19% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 19% |
| Blake CorumLAR · RB | 10.2 | 9.0 | +1.2 | 45% | 43% car | — | 0 | 12 | 43% | 1 | 3% |
| Malik NabersNYG · WR | 1.1 | 7.0 | −5.9 | 74% | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 13% |
| Theo JohnsonNYG · TE | 0.0 | 7.0 | −7.0 | 28% | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 13% |
| Darnell MooneyNYG · WR | 6.8 | 5.2 | +1.6 | 72% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 9% |
| Devin SingletaryNYG · RB | 0.9 | 3.6 | −2.7 | 26% | 14% car | — | 0 | 3 | 14% | 1 | 3% |
| Colby ParkinsonLAR · TE | 3.5 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 71% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Konata MumpfieldLAR · WR | 2.2 | 3.5 | −1.3 | 69% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Tutu AtwellLAR · WR | 2.9 | 3.5 | −0.6 | 18% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Najee HarrisNYG · RB | 0.6 | 2.4 | −1.8 | 14% | 19% car | — | 0 | 4 | 19% | 0 | 0% |
| Jaxson DartNYG · QB | 0.8 | 2.3 | −1.5 | 12% | 5 att | — | 5 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Davis AllenLAR · TE | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 52% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Xavier SmithLAR · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 42% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
Team totals: Giants 32 targets and 21 carries; Rams 30 targets and 28 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2026 season: 1.75 PPR points per target (68% catch rate), 0.60 per carry and 0.47 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Jameis Winston Unlucky
NYG · QB · 3.5 pts on 13.8 expected
11 of 27 passing for 111 yards, 1 interception; 2 carries for 1 yard.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 13.8 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't. Next up: Week 4 against the Cardinals. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Jameis Winston →Matthew Stafford Ran hot
LAR · QB · 28.0 pts on 16.9 expected
22 of 31 passing for 327 yards, 4 touchdowns, 1 interception; 4 carries for -1 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 16.9 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 4 against the Eagles. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Matthew Stafford →Isaiah Likely Volume, no payoff
NYG · TE · 8.3 pts on 17.5 expected
10 targets (31% of the team's), 5 catches for 33 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 17.5 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't. Next up: Week 4 against the Cardinals. Bet on the role more than the result.
Trend: Season high in targets (10).
Cam Skattebo
NYG · RB · 9.5 pts on 14.2 expected
4 targets (13% of the team's), 4 catches for 19 yards; 12 carries (57% of the team's) for 36 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 14.2 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Cardinals. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Cam Skattebo →Davante Adams Ran hot
LAR · WR · 39.5 pts on 17.5 expected
10 targets (33% of the team's), 8 catches for 195 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 17.5 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 4 against the Eagles. Bet on the role more than the result.
Trend: Season high in targets (10).
Terrance Ferguson Strong role
LAR · TE · 17.4 pts on 15.7 expected
9 targets (30% of the team's), 6 catches for 54 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 15.7 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Eagles. Bet on the role more than the result.
Trend: Season high in targets (9).
Kyren Williams Ran hot
LAR · RB · 15.7 pts on 10.7 expected
2 targets (7% of the team's), 2 catches for 12 yards and 1 touchdown; 12 carries (43% of the team's) for 85 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 10.7 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 4 against the Eagles. Bet on the role more than the result.
Trend: Season high in carries (12).
Malachi Fields Unlucky
NYG · WR · 5.0 pts on 10.5 expected
6 targets (19% of the team's), 2 catches for 30 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 10.5 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't. Next up: Week 4 against the Cardinals. Bet on the role more than the result.
Trend: Season high in targets (6).
Start/Sit Decisions
Stock Up, Stock Down
New York Giants
- ▲Stock up: Isaiah Likely played 69% of the snaps, up from a 49% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Malik Nabers played 74% of the snaps, up from a 52% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Darnell Mooney played 72% of the snaps, up from a 57% season average.
Los Angeles Rams
- ▲Stock up: Blake Corum played 45% of the snaps, up from a 23% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Konata Mumpfield played 69% of the snaps, up from a 26% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Davis Allen played 52% of the snaps, up from a 34% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2026 through Week 3.
| Points allowed to | Giants D | Rams D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 17.9 | 15.8 |
| RBs | 21.9 | 17.4 |
| WRs | 35.2 | 29.4 |
| TEs | 12.6 | 7.7 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Los Angeles opened at 70% win probability and passed 98% in the third quarter on the way to the win.
Rams win probability
Key Swings
- +18Stafford → Adams, 31-yd TD67% → 85%Q1 0:11
- +10Stafford → Williams, 10-yd TD85% → 95%Q2 11:07
- −3Zvada 24-yd FG97% → 93%Q2 0:25
- +4Stafford → Adams, 11-yd TD95% → 99%Q3 6:21
Swing in Rams win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| New York Giants | Measure | Los Angeles Rams |
|---|---|---|
| 55 | Plays | 60 |
| 62% | Pass rate | 53% |
| 3.8 | Yds / dropback | 9.9 |
| 2.5 | Yds / carry | 5.8 |
| 3/14 | Third downs | 5/9 |
Efficiency edge Los Angeles ran 5 more plays and gained 6.1 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- NYG Likely 31% · Fields 19% · Skattebo 13%
- LAR Adams 33% · Ferguson 30% · Parkinson 7%
Possession Results
| Result | NYG | LAR |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 0 | 4 |
| Field goals | 2 | 0 |
| Punts | 6 | 3 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 2 |
| Turnovers on downs | 1 | 0 |
| Missed field goals | 0 | 1 |
NYG turnover edge: +1
- The Rams opened the scoring on their second possession, a 8-play, 80-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
- The Rams scored touchdowns on two of their first three drives, then drained the clock with two second-half drives of five to seven minutes.
All 21 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYG | Q1 15:00 | 7 | 27 | 3:48 | Punt |
| LAR | Q1 11:12 | 3 | 5 | 1:21 | Punt |
| NYG | Q1 9:51 | 8 | 10 | 4:16 | Punt |
| LAR | Q1 5:35 | 8 | 80 | 5:24 | Touchdown |
| NYG | Q1 0:11 | 3 | 1 | 0:36 | Punt |
| LAR | Q2 14:35 | 6 | 78 | 3:28 | Touchdown |
| NYG | Q2 11:07 | 9 | 48 | 4:46 | Interception |
| LAR | Q2 6:21 | 2 | 5 | 0:54 | Interception |
| NYG | Q2 5:27 | 4 | 21 | 2:16 | Punt |
| LAR | Q2 3:11 | 1 | 5 | 0:05 | Fumble |
| NYG | Q2 3:06 | 4 | 5 | 2:41 | Field goal |
| LAR | Q2 0:25 | 4 | 40 | 0:25 | Missed FG |
| LAR | Q3 15:00 | 5 | 22 | 1:46 | Punt |
| NYG | Q3 13:14 | 5 | 12 | 3:18 | Punt |
| LAR | Q3 9:56 | 7 | 86 | 3:35 | Touchdown |
| NYG | Q3 6:21 | 7 | 18 | 2:32 | Field goal |
| LAR | Q3 3:49 | 7 | 29 | 3:49 | Punt |
| NYG | Q4 15:00 | 3 | 0 | 0:27 | Punt |
| LAR | Q4 14:33 | 9 | 64 | 5:36 | Touchdown |
| NYG | Q4 8:57 | 7 | 30 | 2:45 | Downs |
| LAR | Q4 6:12 | 9 | 42 | 6:12 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Giants vs Rams Head-to-Head
The Giants and Rams first met in 1938 and have played 48 times since.
- All-time series
- 31–17Rams lead, 48 meetings since 1938
- Postseason
- 1–1Giants won in 1984; Rams won in 1989
- Largest Giants win
- 49–141941
- Largest Rams win
- 55–141966
Since 2021
3–0 Rams lead
3 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- R
- R
- R
Oldest to newest. R = Rams win, G = Giants win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2026 Wk 2 Giants at Rams LAR 28 NYG 6 LAR W
- 2023 Wk 17 Rams at Giants, 2023 Wk 17 recap LAR 26 NYG 25 LAR W
- 2021 Wk 6 Rams at Giants, 2021 Wk 6 recap LAR 38 NYG 11 LAR W
Season to Date (Through Week 3)
The 2026 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Giants | Stat | Rams |
|---|---|---|
| 2-1 | Record | 1-2 |
| 15.3 | Points per game | 20.3 |
| 271.3 | Yards per game | 417.7 |
| 4.5 | Yards per play | 6.3 |
| 18.3 | Points allowed per game | 21.0 |
| 329.0 | Yards allowed per game | 272.7 |
Giants vs Rams Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- LAR −7Rams covered by 15
- Total
- 47.5Under: 34 points scored (by 13.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rams | 27.3 | 28 | +0.8 |
| Giants | 20.3 | 6 | −14.3 |
The Rams beat their implied total and the Giants fell short of theirs; the Fantasy tab has the player lines behind it.
Betting Trends
Last 2 meetings: Rams 2–0 ATS, unders 1–0 (1 push).
Each team's 2026 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
New York Giants
- Against the spread
- 1–1
- Over/under
- 1–1
- ATS as underdog
- 1–1
- ATS on the road
- 0–1
Los Angeles Rams
- Against the spread
- 1–1
- Over/under
- 0–2
- ATS as favorite
- 1–1
- ATS at home
- 1–1
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Giants and Rams in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Giant or a Ram, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Giants or Rams player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Giants and Rams players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Giants and Rams defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2026 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Giants vs Rams Game FAQ
Who won the 2026 Giants vs Rams Week 2 game?
The Los Angeles Rams beat the New York Giants 28–6 in Week 2 of the 2026 season. The game was played at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, CA, on September 21, 2026. See the Rams' 2026 schedule.
What was the final score of Giants vs Rams?
The final score was Rams 28, Giants 6. The Rams led 14–3 at halftime, and the second half went Giants 3, Rams 14.
What happened in the Giants vs Rams game?
Los Angeles led 14–3 at halftime and outscored New York 14–3 after the break to win 28–6. The Rams finished with a 481–182 edge in total offense and averaged 8.0 yards per play. Davante Adams led all players with 8 catches for 195 yards and 2 touchdowns. The Rams committed 2 turnovers, the Giants 1.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Giants vs Rams?
Davante Adams led the game with 39.5 PPR fantasy points, the WR2 of Week 2, on 8 catches for 195 yards and 2 touchdowns. Matthew Stafford was next with 28.0 (QB6). See Davante Adams's 2026 game log.
Who led Giants vs Rams in passing, rushing and receiving?
Matthew Stafford (LAR) led all passers with 22 of 31 for 327 yards, 4 touchdowns and an interception. Kyren Williams (LAR) led in rushing with 12 carries for 85 yards. Davante Adams (LAR) led in receiving with 8 catches for 195 yards and 2 touchdowns.
How many fantasy points did Davante Adams score against the Giants?
Davante Adams scored 39.5 points in PPR leagues, 35.5 in half-PPR and 31.5 in standard scoring against the Giants in Week 2 of the 2026 season, on 8 catches for 195 yards and 2 touchdowns. He drew 33% of his team's targets.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Giants vs Rams?
Davante Adams outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 39.5 PPR points on 17.5 xFP (+22.0). Jameis Winston fell furthest short, with 3.5 points on 13.8 xFP (−10.3). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
How did the Rams beat the Giants?
The Rams beat the Giants 28–6 because they averaged 8.0 yards per play to 3.3 and outgained them 481–182.
Which team won the turnover battle in Giants vs Rams?
The Giants won the turnover battle 2–1: the Rams gave the ball away 2 times and the Giants 1 time. The Rams won the game anyway.
What is the all-time Giants vs Rams record?
The Rams lead the all-time series 31–17 across 48 meetings since 1938, including a 1–1 record in the postseason.
When did the Giants and Rams last play before this game?
Before Week 2 of 2026, they last met in the 2023 season on December 31, 2023, when the Rams beat the Giants 26–25.
Have the Giants and Rams met in the playoffs?
Yes, 2 times, most recently in the 1989 playoffs. The Giants are 1–1 against the Rams in the postseason.
What was the closing spread for Giants vs Rams?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Rams −7, making the Los Angeles Rams 7-point favorites, with a closing total of 47.5. That implied about 27.3 points for the Rams and 20.3 for the Giants.
Did Giants vs Rams go over or under the total?
The game went under. The consensus closing total was 47.5, and the teams combined for 34 points, 13.5 under the number.
Who covered the spread in Giants vs Rams?
The Rams covered by 15 against the closing line of Rams −7. The final margin was 22 points.
