Final2026 Week 1
Lincoln Financial Field, Philadelphia, PA|
Washington Commanders vs Philadelphia Eagles, Week 1 2026
Washington Commanders
Away
22
Philadelphia Eagles
HomeWon
24
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commanders | 3 | 6 | 0 | 13 | 22 |
| Eagles | 0 | 14 | 3 | 7 | 24 |
WAS 22 · PHI 24 Final
Passing leader
PHI · QB
24.7PPR pts
14/25, 203 YDS, 3 TD
Top fantasy scorer
PHI · TE
23.7PPR pts
4 REC, 77 YDS, 2 TD
Commanders leader
WAS · QB
17.7PPR pts
18/34, 164 YDS, 2 TD
Defensive playmaker
Jihaad Campbell
PHI
1 SACK, 9 TKL
Eagles 24, Commanders 22: Philadelphia holds off Washington
Philadelphia led 14–9 at halftime after a 14-point second quarter and won 24–22, though Washington took the second half 13–10. The Eagles finished with a narrow 318–295 edge in total offense and averaged 6.0 yards per play.
The Commanders went 5-for-15 on third down, while the Eagles finished without a giveaway.
The two teams meet again in Week 8 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +1.6 yards/play PHI 6.0 · WAS 4.4
- +23 total yards PHI 318 · WAS 295
- +10% third-down rate PHI 43% · WAS 33%
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Commander or Eagle on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Eagles Won
Philadelphia won the efficiency and third-down battles.
| Commanders | Stat | Eagles |
|---|---|---|
| 4.4 | Yards per play | 6.0 |
| 295 | Total yards | 318 |
| 33% | Third-down conversion | 43% |
| Other team stats | ||
| 67 | Plays | 53 |
| 0 | Turnovers | 0 |
| 33:20 | Time of possession | 26:40 |
Scoring Summary
The Eagles scored three touchdowns and one field goal; the Commanders scored three touchdowns and one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | WAS | PHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 11:23 | WAS | Drew Stevens 55-yard FG Takes lead | 3 | 0 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 14:11 | PHI | Jalen Hurts → Dallas Goedert, 17-yard TD Takes leadJake Elliott XP | 3 | 7 |
| 6:27 | PHI | Jalen Hurts → Dontayvion Wicks, 9-yard TD Extends leadJake Elliott XP | 3 | 14 |
| 1:50 | WAS | Jacory Croskey-Merritt 1-yard TD runXP missed | 9 | 14 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 0:44 | PHI | Jake Elliott 35-yard FG Extends lead | 9 | 17 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 9:59 | WAS | Jayden Daniels → Stefon Diggs, 10-yard TDDrew Stevens XP | 16 | 17 |
| 6:02 | PHI | Jalen Hurts → Dallas Goedert, 43-yard TD Extends leadJake Elliott XP | 16 | 24 |
| 1:01 | WAS | Jayden Daniels → Antonio Williams, 1-yard TD2-pt try failed | 22 | 24 |
Fantasy Points: Commanders vs Eagles, Week 1 2026
Fantasy leaders
- Jalen HurtsPHI · QB24.7 PTSQB8
- Dallas GoedertPHI · TE23.7 PTSTE3
- Jayden DanielsWAS · QB17.7 PTSQB14
- Antonio WilliamsWAS · WR16.4 PTSWR16
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.7 | QB8 | 14/25 | 203 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 46 | 0 | 122.2 | Start/Sit → | |
| 17.7 | QB14 | 18/34 | 164 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 31 | 0 | 85.9 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.7 | TE3 | TE | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 77 | 2 | Start/Sit → | |
| 16.4 | WR16 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 64 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 15.5 | WR17 | WR | — | — | — | 9 | 4 | 55 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 15.3 | WR21 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 73 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 12.6 | RB22 | RB | 16 | 63 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -7 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.0 | RB29 | RB | 15 | 83 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -3 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.3 | WR47 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 3 | 53 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.7 | RB43 | RB | 7 | 22 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.6 | TE36 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 16 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.4 | WR85 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 14 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.3 | TE39 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 13 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.5 | WR91 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | -5 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.2 | RB63 | RB | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.6 | RB64 | RB | 4 | 16 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.4 | WR102 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.3 | RB72 | RB | 1 | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Washington Commanders
Snap Share
Terry McLaurinWR61 snaps87%
Stefon DiggsWR44 snaps63%
Chig OkonkwoTE39 snaps56%
Dyami BrownWR37 snaps53%
John BatesTE34 snaps49%
Target Share29 targets
- Stefon Diggs31%, 9 targets
- Terry McLaurin14%, 4 targets
- Antonio Williams14%, 4 targets
- John Bates10%, 3 targets
- Chig Okonkwo10%, 3 targets
- Other21%, 6 targets
Carry Share32 carries
- Jacory Croskey-Merritt50%, 16 carries
- Rachaad White22%, 7 carries
- Jayden Daniels16%, 5 carries
- Kaytron Allen13%, 4 carries
Philadelphia Eagles
Snap Share
Dallas GoedertTE52 snaps95%
DeVonta SmithWR52 snaps95%
Dontayvion WicksWR50 snaps91%
Saquon BarkleyRB39 snaps71%
Makai LemonWR35 snaps64%
Target Share22 targets
- DeVonta Smith27%, 6 targets
- Dallas Goedert23%, 5 targets
- Dontayvion Wicks18%, 4 targets
- Makai Lemon18%, 4 targets
- Saquon Barkley9%, 2 targets
- Other5%, 1 targets
Carry Share25 carries
- Saquon Barkley60%, 15 carries
- Jalen Hurts28%, 7 carries
- Will Shipley8%, 2 carries
- Tank Bigsby4%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52 | 95% | 5 | 23% | 0 | |
| 52 | 95% | 6 | 27% | 0 | |
| 50 | 91% | 4 | 18% | 0 | |
| 61 | 87% | 4 | 14% | 0 | |
| 39 | 71% | 2 | 9% | 15 | |
| 35 | 64% | 4 | 18% | 0 | |
| 44 | 63% | 9 | 31% | 0 | |
| 39 | 56% | 3 | 10% | 0 | |
| 37 | 53% | 2 | 7% | 0 | |
| 34 | 49% | 3 | 10% | 0 | |
| 34 | 49% | 1 | 3% | 16 | |
| 29 | 41% | 2 | 7% | 7 | |
| 26 | 37% | 4 | 14% | 0 | |
| 20 | 36% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 18 | 26% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 18 | 26% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 10 | 18% | 1 | 5% | 2 | |
| 8 | 15% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 6 | 11% | 0 | 0% | 1 | |
| 7 | 10% | 0 | 0% | 4 | |
| 2 | 3% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+15.0Dallas Goedert23.7 PTS vs 8.7 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−4.5Makai Lemon2.5 PTS vs 7.0 xFP
- Highest expected volume18.9 xFPJayden Daniels17.7 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jayden DanielsWAS · QB | 17.7 | 18.9 | −1.2 | 100% | 34 att | — | 34 | 5 | 16% | 0 | 0% |
| Jalen HurtsPHI · QB | 24.7 | 15.9 | +8.8 | 100% | 25 att | — | 25 | 7 | 28% | 0 | 0% |
| Stefon DiggsWAS · WR | 15.5 | 15.7 | −0.2 | 63% | 31% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 9 | 31% |
| Saquon BarkleyPHI · RB | 9.0 | 12.5 | −3.5 | 71% | 60% car | — | 0 | 15 | 60% | 2 | 9% |
| Jacory Croskey-MerrittWAS · RB | 12.6 | 11.4 | +1.2 | 49% | 50% car | — | 0 | 16 | 50% | 1 | 3% |
| DeVonta SmithPHI · WR | 8.3 | 10.5 | −2.2 | 95% | 27% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 27% |
| Dallas GoedertPHI · TE | 23.7 | 8.7 | +15.0 | 95% | 23% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 23% |
| Rachaad WhiteWAS · RB | 4.7 | 7.7 | −3.0 | 41% | 22% car | — | 0 | 7 | 22% | 2 | 7% |
| Antonio WilliamsWAS · — | 16.4 | 7.0 | +9.4 | 37% | 14% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 14% |
| Dontayvion WicksPHI · WR | 15.3 | 7.0 | +8.3 | 91% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 18% |
| Makai LemonPHI · WR | 2.5 | 7.0 | −4.5 | 64% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 18% |
| Terry McLaurinWAS · WR | 3.4 | 7.0 | −3.6 | 87% | 14% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 14% |
| Chig OkonkwoWAS · TE | 3.6 | 5.2 | −1.6 | 56% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 10% |
| John BatesWAS · TE | 3.3 | 5.2 | −1.9 | 49% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 10% |
| Dyami BrownWAS · WR | 0.0 | 3.5 | −3.5 | 53% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Will ShipleyPHI · RB | 2.2 | 3.0 | −0.8 | 18% | 8% car | — | 0 | 2 | 8% | 1 | 5% |
| Kaytron AllenWAS · RB | 1.6 | 2.4 | −0.8 | 10% | 13% car | — | 0 | 4 | 13% | 0 | 0% |
| Jaylin LaneWAS · WR | 1.4 | 1.7 | −0.3 | 26% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Tank BigsbyPHI · RB | 0.3 | 0.6 | −0.3 | 11% | 4% car | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Commanders 29 targets and 32 carries; Eagles 22 targets and 25 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2026 season: 1.75 PPR points per target (68% catch rate), 0.60 per carry and 0.47 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Jayden Daniels
WAS · QB · 17.7 pts on 18.9 expected
18 of 34 passing for 164 yards, 2 touchdowns; 5 carries for 31 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 18.9 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Colts. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Jayden Daniels →Jalen Hurts Ran hot
PHI · QB · 24.7 pts on 15.9 expected
14 of 25 passing for 203 yards, 3 touchdowns; 7 carries for 46 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 15.9 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 4 against the Rams. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Jalen Hurts →Stefon Diggs Volume, no payoff
WAS · WR · 15.5 pts on 15.7 expected
9 targets (31% of the team's), 4 catches for 55 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 15.7 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Colts. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Stefon Diggs →Jacory Croskey-Merritt
WAS · RB · 12.6 pts on 11.4 expected
1 target (3% of the team's), 1 catch for -7 yards; 16 carries (50% of the team's) for 63 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 11.4 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Colts. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Jacory Croskey-Merritt →Saquon Barkley Volume, no payoff
PHI · RB · 9.0 pts on 12.5 expected
2 targets (9% of the team's), 1 catch for -3 yards; 15 carries (60% of the team's) for 83 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 12.5 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Rams. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Saquon Barkley →DeVonta Smith
PHI · WR · 8.3 pts on 10.5 expected
6 targets (27% of the team's), 3 catches for 53 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 10.5 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Rams. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: DeVonta Smith →Dallas Goedert Ran hot
PHI · TE · 23.7 pts on 8.7 expected
5 targets (23% of the team's), 4 catches for 77 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 8.7 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 4 against the Rams. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Dallas Goedert →Antonio Williams Ran hot
WAS · — · 16.4 pts on 7.0 expected
4 targets (14% of the team's), 4 catches for 64 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 7.0 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 4 against the Colts. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Antonio Williams →Start/Sit Decisions
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2026 through Week 3.
| Points allowed to | Commanders D | Eagles D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 28.1 | 20.7 |
| RBs | 12.3 | 16.8 |
| WRs | 46.7 | 30.5 |
| TEs | 21.4 | 6.6 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Philadelphia opened at 67% win probability and passed 98% in the fourth quarter on the way to the win.
Eagles win probability
Key Swings
- +22Hurts → Goedert, 17-yd TD55% → 77%Q2 14:11
- +15Hurts → Wicks, 9-yd TD77% → 92%Q2 6:27
- −13Croskey-Merritt 1-yd TD run93% → 80%Q2 1:50
- −31Daniels → Diggs, 10-yd TD95% → 64%Q4 9:59
- +33Hurts → Goedert, 43-yd TD65% → 98%Q4 6:02
Swing in Eagles win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Washington Commanders | Measure | Philadelphia Eagles |
|---|---|---|
| 67 | Plays | 53 |
| 52% | Pass rate | 53% |
| 4.7 | Yds / dropback | 6.5 |
| 4.1 | Yds / carry | 5.4 |
| 5/15 | Third downs | 6/14 |
Efficiency edge Philadelphia ran 14 fewer plays but gained 1.8 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- WAS Diggs 31% · Williams 14% · McLaurin 14%
- PHI Smith 27% · Goedert 23% · Wicks 18%
Possession Results
| Result | WAS | PHI |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 3 | 3 |
| Field goals | 1 | 1 |
| Punts | 6 | 7 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 0 |
| Missed field goals | 1 | 0 |
- The Commanders opened the scoring on their first possession, a 8-play, 27-yard drive that ended in a field goal.
All 24 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAS | Q1 15:00 | 8 | 27 | 3:37 | Field goal |
| PHI | Q1 11:23 | 6 | 13 | 2:50 | Punt |
| WAS | Q1 8:33 | 3 | 0 | 1:01 | Punt |
| PHI | Q1 7:32 | 4 | -11 | 2:35 | Punt |
| WAS | Q1 4:57 | 3 | 9 | 2:19 | Punt |
| PHI | Q1 2:38 | 5 | 76 | 3:27 | Touchdown |
| WAS | Q2 14:11 | 3 | 1 | 1:13 | Punt |
| PHI | Q2 12:58 | 3 | 4 | 0:57 | Punt |
| WAS | Q2 12:01 | 5 | 3 | 3:15 | Punt |
| PHI | Q2 8:46 | 5 | 62 | 2:19 | Touchdown |
| WAS | Q2 6:27 | 12 | 67 | 4:34 | Touchdown |
| PHI | Q2 1:53 | 5 | 18 | 1:20 | Punt |
| WAS | Q2 0:33 | 1 | 4 | 0:33 | End of half |
| PHI | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 8 | 2:13 | Punt |
| WAS | Q3 12:47 | 3 | 6 | 1:36 | Punt |
| PHI | Q3 11:11 | 3 | 4 | 1:25 | Punt |
| WAS | Q3 9:46 | 7 | 20 | 3:00 | Missed FG |
| PHI | Q3 6:46 | 3 | -6 | 1:36 | Punt |
| WAS | Q3 5:10 | 3 | 4 | 1:26 | Punt |
| PHI | Q3 3:44 | 7 | 43 | 3:00 | Field goal |
| WAS | Q3 0:44 | 9 | 67 | 5:45 | Touchdown |
| PHI | Q4 9:59 | 8 | 74 | 3:57 | Touchdown |
| WAS | Q4 6:02 | 12 | 63 | 5:01 | Touchdown |
| PHI | Q4 1:01 | 2 | -2 | 1:01 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Commanders vs Eagles Head-to-Head
The Commanders and Eagles first met in 1934 and have played 186 times since. They have been NFC East rivals since 1970.
- All-time series
- 91–89–6Commanders lead, 186 meetings since 1934
- Postseason
- 1–1Commanders won in 1990; Eagles won in 2024
- Largest Commanders win
- 42–71957
- Largest Eagles win
- 45–01948
Since 2021
9–3 Eagles lead
12 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- E
- E
- E
- C
- E
- E
- E
- C
- E
- E
- C
- E
Oldest to newest. E = Eagles win, C = Commanders win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 8 Eagles at Commanders Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2026 Wk 1 Commanders at Eagles PHI 24 WAS 22 PHI W
- 2025 Wk 18 Commanders at Eagles, 2025 Wk 18 recap WAS 24 PHI 17 WAS W
- 2025 Wk 16 Eagles at Commanders, 2025 Wk 16 recap PHI 29 WAS 18 PHI W
- 2024 Conference Championship Commanders at Eagles, 2024 Conference Championship recap PHI 55 WAS 23 PHI W
- 2024 Wk 16 Eagles at Commanders, 2024 Wk 16 recap WAS 36 PHI 33 WAS W
- 2024 Wk 11 Commanders at Eagles, 2024 Wk 11 recap PHI 26 WAS 18 PHI W
- 2023 Wk 8 Eagles at Commanders, 2023 Wk 8 recap PHI 38 WAS 31 PHI W
- 2023 Wk 4 Commanders at Eagles, 2023 Wk 4 recap PHI 34 WAS 31 PHI W
- 2022 Wk 10 Commanders at Eagles, 2022 Wk 10 recap WAS 32 PHI 21 WAS W
- 2022 Wk 3 Eagles at Commanders, 2022 Wk 3 recap PHI 24 WAS 8 PHI W
- 2021 Wk 17 Eagles at Commanders, 2021 Wk 17 recap PHI 20 WAS 16 PHI W
- 2021 Wk 15 Commanders at Eagles, 2021 Wk 15 recap PHI 27 WAS 17 PHI W
Season to Date (Through Week 3)
The 2026 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Commanders | Stat | Eagles |
|---|---|---|
| 1-2 | Record | 2-1 |
| 25.0 | Points per game | 18.3 |
| 314.0 | Yards per game | 302.3 |
| 4.7 | Yards per play | 5.3 |
| 30.7 | Points allowed per game | 23.0 |
| 362.3 | Yards allowed per game | 320.3 |
Commanders vs Eagles Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- PHI −6Eagles failed to cover by 4
- Total
- 43.5Over: 46 points scored (by 2.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eagles | 24.8 | 24 | −0.8 |
| Commanders | 18.8 | 22 | +3.3 |
The Commanders beat their implied total and the Eagles fell short of theirs; the Fantasy tab has the player lines behind it.
Betting Trends
Last 6 meetings: Commanders 4–2 ATS, overs 4–2.
Each team's 2026 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Washington Commanders
- Against the spread
- 1–0
- Over/under
- 1–0
- ATS as underdog
- 1–0
- ATS on the road
- 1–0
Philadelphia Eagles
- Against the spread
- 0–1
- Over/under
- 1–0
- ATS as favorite
- 0–1
- ATS at home
- 0–1
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Commanders vs Eagles Fantasy Outlook for 2026
One meeting is left on the 2026 schedule: Week 8 in Washington. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Commanders or Eagles player start in Week 8? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Commanders and Eagles players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Commanders and Eagles defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere this matchup falls in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2026 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Commanders vs Eagles Game FAQ
Who won the 2026 Commanders vs Eagles Week 1 game?
The Philadelphia Eagles beat the Washington Commanders 24–22 in Week 1 of the 2026 season. The game was played at Lincoln Financial Field in Philadelphia, PA, on September 13, 2026. See the Eagles' 2026 schedule.
What was the final score of Commanders vs Eagles?
The final score was Eagles 24, Commanders 22. The Eagles led 14–9 at halftime, and the second half went Commanders 13, Eagles 10.
What happened in the Commanders vs Eagles game?
Philadelphia led 14–9 at halftime after a 14-point second quarter and won 24–22, though Washington took the second half 13–10. The Eagles finished with a narrow 318–295 edge in total offense and averaged 6.0 yards per play. Jalen Hurts led all players with 14 of 25 passing for 203 yards and 3 touchdowns, plus 7 carries for 46 rushing yards.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Commanders vs Eagles?
Jalen Hurts led the game with 24.7 PPR fantasy points, the QB8 of Week 1, on 14 of 25 passing for 203 yards and 3 touchdowns, plus 7 carries for 46 rushing yards. Dallas Goedert was next with 23.7 (TE3). See Jalen Hurts's 2026 game log.
Who led Commanders vs Eagles in passing, rushing and receiving?
Jalen Hurts (PHI) led all passers with 14 of 25 for 203 yards and 3 touchdowns. Saquon Barkley (PHI) led in rushing with 15 carries for 83 yards. Dallas Goedert (PHI) led in receiving with 4 catches for 77 yards and 2 touchdowns.
How many fantasy points did Jalen Hurts score against the Commanders?
Jalen Hurts scored 24.7 fantasy points against the Commanders in Week 1 of the 2026 season, the same in PPR, half-PPR and standard scoring because he had no catches, on 14 of 25 passing for 203 yards and 3 touchdowns, plus 7 carries for 46 rushing yards.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Commanders vs Eagles?
Dallas Goedert outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 23.7 PPR points on 8.7 xFP (+15.0). Makai Lemon fell furthest short, with 2.5 points on 7.0 xFP (−4.5). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Commanders vs Eagles?
Jayden Daniels had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 18.9 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 17.7. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Eagles beat the Commanders?
The Eagles beat the Commanders 24–22 because they averaged 6.0 yards per play to 4.4 and outgained them 318–295.
What is the all-time Commanders vs Eagles record?
The Commanders lead the all-time series 91–89–6 across 186 meetings since 1934, including a 1–1 record in the postseason.
When did the Commanders and Eagles last play before this game?
Before Week 1 of 2026, they last met in the 2025 season on January 4, 2026, when the Commanders beat the Eagles 24–17.
Have the Commanders and Eagles met in the playoffs?
Yes, 2 times, most recently in the 2024 playoffs. The Commanders are 1–1 against the Eagles in the postseason.
What was the closing spread for Commanders vs Eagles?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Eagles −6, making the Philadelphia Eagles 6-point favorites, with a closing total of 43.5. That implied about 24.8 points for the Eagles and 18.8 for the Commanders.
Did Commanders vs Eagles go over or under the total?
The game went over. The consensus closing total was 43.5, and the teams combined for 46 points, 2.5 over the number.
Who covered the spread in Commanders vs Eagles?
The Commanders covered as 6-point underdogs against the closing line of Eagles −6. The final margin was 2 points.
