Final2023 Week 17
Northwest Stadium, Landover, MD|
San Francisco 49ers vs Washington Commanders, Week 17 2023
San Francisco 49ers
AwayWon
27
Washington Commanders
Home
10
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49ers | 10 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 27 |
| Commanders | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
SF 27 · WAS 10 Final
Passing leader
SF · QB
17.6PPR pts
22/28, 230 YDS, 2 TD
Top fantasy scorer
Brandon Aiyuk
SF · WR
24.4PPR pts
7 REC, 114 YDS, 1 TD
Commanders leader
WAS · WR
16.1PPR pts
4 REC, 61 YDS, 1 TD
Defensive playmaker
Charvarius Ward
SF
1 INT, 4 TKL
49ers 27, Commanders 10: San Francisco leads from start to finish
San Francisco led 13–10 at halftime and outscored Washington 14–0 after the break to win 27–10. The 49ers finished with a 408–225 edge in total offense and averaged 6.0 yards per play.
The gap showed up everywhere. The Commanders went 3-for-9 on third down and committed two turnovers, while the 49ers kept the ball for 38:13 and finished without a giveaway.
The two teams meet again in Week 6 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +0.8 yards/play SF 6.0 · WAS 5.2
- +2 turnover margin SF 0 turnovers
- +183 total yards SF 408 · WAS 225
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a 49er or Commander on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the 49ers Won
San Francisco won the efficiency, turnover, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| 49ers | Stat | Commanders |
|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | Yards per play | 5.2 |
| 0 | Turnovers | 2 |
| 408 | Total yards | 225 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 68 | Plays | 43 |
| 44% | Third-down conversion | 33% |
| 38:13 | Time of possession | 21:47 |
Scoring Summary
The 49ers scored three touchdowns and two field goals; the Commanders scored one touchdown and one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | SF | WAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 8:06 | SF | Jake Moody 38-yard FG Takes lead | 3 | 0 |
| 1:31 | SF | Brock Purdy → Deebo Samuel, 2-yard TD Extends leadJake Moody XP | 10 | 0 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 12:05 | WAS | Joey Slye 47-yard FG | 10 | 3 |
| 4:33 | WAS | Sam Howell → Terry McLaurin, 3-yard TD Ties gameJoey Slye XP | 10 | 10 |
| 0:19 | SF | Jake Moody 22-yard FG Takes lead | 13 | 10 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 5:44 | SF | Elijah Mitchell 2-yard TD run Extends leadJake Moody XP | 20 | 10 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 9:20 | SF | Brock Purdy → Brandon Aiyuk, 17-yard TD Extends leadJake Moody XP | 27 | 10 |
Fantasy Points: 49ers vs Commanders, Week 17 2023
Fantasy leaders
- Brandon AiyukSF · WR24.4 PTSWR5
- Deebo SamuelSF · WR18.2 PTSWR13
- Brock PurdySF · QB17.6 PTSQB14
- Terry McLaurinWAS · WR16.1 PTSWR21
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17.6 | QB14 | 22/28 | 230 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 124.7 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.7 | QB30 | 17/28 | 169 | 1 | 2 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 60.0 | Start/Sit → | |
| -0.2 | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | -2 | 0 | — | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.4 | WR5 | WR | — | — | — | 8 | 7 | 114 | 1 | ||
| 18.2 | WR13 | WR | 3 | 35 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 37 | 1 | ||
| 16.1 | WR21 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 4 | 61 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 14.0 | RB19 | RB | 17 | 80 | 1 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 13.1 | RB21 | RB | 14 | 64 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 27 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 11.6 | RB24 | RB | 9 | 44 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 32 | 0 | ||
| 6.3 | WR59 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 33 | 0 | ||
| 5.9 | TE27 | TE | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 29 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.6 | RB47 | RB | 4 | 19 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 17 | 0 | ||
| 5.0 | TE31 | TE | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 20 | 0 | ||
| 1.6 | TE53 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.3 | RB73 | RB | 2 | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fantasy Usage
San Francisco 49ers
Snap Share
George KittleTE64 snaps91%
Brandon AiyukWR61 snaps87%
Deebo SamuelWR59 snaps84%
Christian McCaffreyRB38 snaps54%
Elijah MitchellRB26 snaps37%
Target Share24 targets
- Brandon Aiyuk33%, 8 targets
- Deebo Samuel25%, 6 targets
- Christian McCaffrey21%, 5 targets
- George Kittle17%, 4 targets
- Ronnie Bell4%, 1 targets
Carry Share39 carries
- Elijah Mitchell44%, 17 carries
- Christian McCaffrey36%, 14 carries
- Deebo Samuel8%, 3 carries
- Sam Darnold5%, 2 carries
- Jordan Mason5%, 2 carries
- Other3%, 1 carries
Washington Commanders
Snap Share
Terry McLaurinWR41 snaps89%
Jahan DotsonWR39 snaps85%
Logan ThomasTE28 snaps61%
John BatesTE25 snaps54%
Brian RobinsonRB25 snaps54%
Target Share26 targets
- Terry McLaurin27%, 7 targets
- Logan Thomas15%, 4 targets
- Curtis Samuel15%, 4 targets
- Antonio Gibson15%, 4 targets
- Brian Robinson15%, 4 targets
- Other12%, 3 targets
Carry Share14 carries
- Brian Robinson64%, 9 carries
- Antonio Gibson29%, 4 carries
- Sam Howell7%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64 | 91% | 4 | 17% | 0 | |
| 41 | 89% | 7 | 27% | 0 | |
| 61 | 87% | 8 | 33% | 0 | |
| 39 | 85% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 59 | 84% | 6 | 25% | 3 | |
| 28 | 61% | 4 | 15% | 0 | |
| 25 | 54% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 25 | 54% | 4 | 15% | 9 | |
| 38 | 54% | 5 | 21% | 14 | |
| 23 | 50% | 4 | 15% | 0 | |
| 20 | 43% | 4 | 15% | 4 | |
| 26 | 37% | 0 | 0% | 17 | |
| 22 | 31% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 12 | 26% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 17 | 24% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 10 | 22% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 10 | 14% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 6 | 9% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 5 | 7% | 0 | 0% | 2 | |
| 2 | 4% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 3 | 4% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+11.0Brandon Aiyuk24.4 PTS vs 13.4 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−3.8Christian McCaffrey13.1 PTS vs 16.9 xFP
- Highest expected volume16.9 xFPChristian McCaffrey13.1 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christian McCaffreySF · RB | 13.1 | 16.9 | −3.8 | 54% | 36% car | — | 0 | 14 | 36% | 5 | 19% |
| Brandon AiyukSF · WR | 24.4 | 13.4 | +11.0 | 87% | 30% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 30% |
| Brock PurdySF · QB | 17.6 | 12.4 | +5.2 | 93% | 28 att | — | 28 | 1 | 3% | 0 | 0% |
| Sam HowellWAS · QB | 8.7 | 12.4 | −3.7 | 100% | 28 att | — | 28 | 1 | 7% | 0 | 0% |
| Brian Robinson Jr.WAS · RB | 11.6 | 12.2 | −0.6 | 54% | 64% car | — | 0 | 9 | 64% | 4 | 15% |
| Deebo Samuel Sr.SF · WR | 18.2 | 11.9 | +6.3 | 84% | 22% tgt | — | 0 | 3 | 8% | 6 | 22% |
| Terry McLaurinWAS · WR | 16.1 | 11.7 | +4.4 | 89% | 27% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 27% |
| Elijah MitchellSF · RB | 14.0 | 10.4 | +3.6 | 37% | 44% car | — | 0 | 17 | 44% | 0 | 0% |
| Antonio GibsonWAS · RB | 5.6 | 9.1 | −3.5 | 43% | 29% car | — | 0 | 4 | 29% | 4 | 15% |
| Curtis SamuelWAS · WR | 6.3 | 6.7 | −0.4 | 50% | 15% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 15% |
| George KittleSF · TE | 5.9 | 6.7 | −0.8 | 91% | 15% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 15% |
| Logan ThomasWAS · TE | 5.0 | 6.7 | −1.7 | 61% | 15% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 15% |
| Kyle JuszczykSF · RB | 5.3 | 5.0 | +0.3 | — | 11% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 11% |
| Byron PringleWAS · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 22% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Jahan DotsonWAS · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 85% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| John BatesWAS · TE | 1.6 | 1.7 | −0.1 | 54% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Ronnie BellSF · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 14% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Jordan MasonSF · RB | 0.3 | 1.2 | −0.9 | 7% | 5% car | — | 0 | 2 | 5% | 0 | 0% |
| Sam DarnoldSF · QB | -0.2 | 1.2 | −1.4 | 7% | 0 att | — | 0 | 2 | 5% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: 49ers 27 targets and 39 carries; Commanders 26 targets and 14 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2023 season: 1.67 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.61 per carry and 0.42 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Brock Purdy Ran hot
SF · QB · 17.6 pts on 12.4 expected
22 of 28 passing for 230 yards, 2 touchdowns; 1 carry for 4 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 12.4 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 11.5, 29.5, 22.4, 25.7, 6.4, 17.6
W12W13W14W15W16W17
No interceptions after 5 in the previous four games.
Sam Howell
WAS · QB · 8.7 pts on 12.4 expected
17 of 28 passing for 169 yards, 1 touchdown, 2 interceptions; 1 carry for -1 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 12.4 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 20.7, 18.3, 20.2, 9.3, 0.2, 8.7
W11W12W13W15W16W17
Christian McCaffrey
SF · RB · 13.1 pts on 16.9 expected
5 targets (19% of the team's), 4 catches for 27 yards; 14 carries (36% of the team's) for 64 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 16.9 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 30.9, 22.3, 16.3, 41.7, 25.1, 13.1
W12W13W14W15W16W17
Lowest-scoring game of the season. A touchdown in 5 of the last 8 games.
Brandon Aiyuk Ran hot
SF · WR · 24.4 pts on 13.4 expected
8 targets (30% of the team's), 7 catches for 114 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 13.4 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 13.0, 15.6, 16.6, 6.7, 17.3, 24.4
W12W13W14W15W16W17
Best score since Week 11. A touchdown in 5 of the last 8 games.
Brian Robinson Jr. Volume, no payoff
WAS · RB · 11.6 pts on 12.2 expected
4 targets (15% of the team's), 4 catches for 32 yards; 9 carries (64% of the team's) for 44 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 12.2 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 11.7, 27.7, 20.2, 8.4, 5.3, 11.6
W9W10W11W12W13W17
Terry McLaurin
WAS · WR · 16.1 pts on 11.7 expected
7 targets (27% of the team's), 4 catches for 61 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 11.7 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 9.3, 9.0, 0.0, 26.1, 8.0, 16.1
W11W12W13W15W16W17
Deebo Samuel Sr. Ran hot
SF · WR · 18.2 pts on 11.9 expected
6 targets (22% of the team's), 5 catches for 37 yards and 1 touchdown; 3 carries (8% of the team's) for 35 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 11.9 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 22.4, 35.8, 34.0, 21.9, 9.4, 18.2
W12W13W14W15W16W17
A touchdown in 6 of the last 8 games.
Elijah Mitchell
SF · RB · 14.0 pts on 10.4 expected
17 carries (44% of the team's) for 80 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 10.4 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 0.2, 2.3, 2.4, 4.6, 1.3, 14.0
W8W10W11W12W13W17
Season high in carries (17). Best fantasy game of the season.
Stock Up, Stock Down
San Francisco 49ers
- ▲Stock up: Elijah Mitchell played 37% of the snaps, up from a 17% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Christian McCaffrey played 54% of the snaps, down from a 84% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2023 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | 49ers D | Commanders D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 14.8 | 21.1 |
| RBs | 18.0 | 25.0 |
| WRs | 33.4 | 41.1 |
| TEs | 10.8 | 10.5 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Washington opened at 50% win probability and fell below 2% in the fourth quarter.
Commanders win probability
Key Swings
- −9Moody 38-yd FG50% → 41%Q1 8:06
- −20Purdy → Samuel, 2-yd TD40% → 20%Q1 1:31
- +25Howell → McLaurin, 3-yd TD25% → 50%Q2 4:33
- −12Moody 22-yd FG50% → 38%Q2 0:19
- −25Mitchell 2-yd TD run35% → 10%Q3 5:44
Swing in Commanders win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| San Francisco 49ers | Measure | Washington Commanders |
|---|---|---|
| 68 | Plays | 43 |
| 43% | Pass rate | 67% |
| 7.7 | Yds / dropback | 5.6 |
| 4.7 | Yds / carry | 4.4 |
| 4/9 | Third downs | 3/9 |
Efficiency edge San Francisco ran 25 more plays and gained 2.1 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- SF Aiyuk 30% · Samuel 22% · McCaffrey 19%
- WAS McLaurin 27% · Gibson 15% · Robinson 15%
Possession Results
| Result | SF | WAS |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 3 | 1 |
| Field goals | 2 | 1 |
| Punts | 2 | 3 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 2 |
| Turnovers on downs | 1 | 1 |
SF turnover edge: +2
- The 49ers opened the scoring on their first possession, a 12-play, 55-yard drive that ended in a field goal.
- The 49ers drained the clock with three second-half drives of four to eight minutes.
All 18 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF | Q1 15:00 | 12 | 55 | 6:54 | Field goal |
| WAS | Q1 8:06 | 3 | 2 | 0:57 | Punt |
| SF | Q1 7:09 | 9 | 63 | 5:38 | Touchdown |
| WAS | Q1 1:31 | 9 | 46 | 4:26 | Field goal |
| SF | Q2 12:05 | 4 | 17 | 2:14 | Punt |
| WAS | Q2 9:51 | 9 | 84 | 5:18 | Touchdown |
| SF | Q2 4:33 | 10 | 71 | 4:14 | Field goal |
| WAS | Q2 0:19 | 1 | -1 | 0:19 | End of half |
| WAS | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 3 | 2:01 | Punt |
| SF | Q3 12:59 | 12 | 83 | 7:15 | Touchdown |
| WAS | Q3 5:44 | 10 | 64 | 5:51 | Interception |
| SF | Q4 14:53 | 10 | 95 | 5:33 | Touchdown |
| WAS | Q4 9:20 | 2 | 6 | 0:30 | Interception |
| SF | Q4 8:50 | 8 | 39 | 4:54 | Downs |
| WAS | Q4 3:56 | 3 | 3 | 1:40 | Punt |
| SF | Q4 2:16 | 3 | -3 | 0:37 | Punt |
| WAS | Q4 1:39 | 4 | 8 | 0:45 | Downs |
| SF | Q4 0:54 | 2 | -2 | 0:54 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
49ers vs Commanders Head-to-Head
The 49ers and Commanders first met in 1952 and have played 36 times since.
- All-time series
- 23–12–149ers lead, 36 meetings since 1952
- Postseason
- 3–1Split 3–1
- Largest 49ers win
- 45–101998
- Largest Commanders win
- 52–172005
Since 2021
2–0 49ers lead
2 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- 4
- 4
Oldest to newest. 4 = 49ers win, C = Commanders win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 6 Commanders at 49ers Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2023 Wk 17 49ers at Commanders SF 27 WAS 10 SF W
- 2022 Wk 16 Commanders at 49ers, 2022 Wk 16 recap SF 37 WAS 20 SF W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2023 regular season, from each game's box score.
| 49ers | Stat | Commanders |
|---|---|---|
| 12-5 | Record | 4-13 |
| 28.9 | Points per game | 19.4 |
| 398.4 | Yards per game | 312.8 |
| 6.6 | Yards per play | 5.0 |
| 17.5 | Points allowed per game | 30.5 |
| 303.9 | Yards allowed per game | 388.9 |
49ers vs Commanders Fantasy Outlook for 2026
One meeting is left on the 2026 schedule: Week 6 in San Francisco. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your 49ers or Commanders player start in Week 6? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for 49ers and Commanders players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the 49ers and Commanders defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere this matchup falls in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2023 Game Logs for Players in This Game
49ers vs Commanders Game FAQ
Who won the 2023 49ers vs Commanders Week 17 game?
The San Francisco 49ers beat the Washington Commanders 27–10 in Week 17 of the 2023 season. The game was played at Northwest Stadium in Landover, MD, on December 31, 2023. See the 49ers' 2023 schedule.
What was the final score of 49ers vs Commanders?
The final score was 49ers 27, Commanders 10. The 49ers led 13–10 at halftime, and the second half went 49ers 14, Commanders 0.
What happened in the 49ers vs Commanders game?
San Francisco led 13–10 at halftime and outscored Washington 14–0 after the break to win 27–10. The 49ers finished with a 408–225 edge in total offense and averaged 6.0 yards per play. Brandon Aiyuk led all players with 7 catches for 114 yards and a touchdown. The Commanders committed 2 turnovers, the 49ers none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in 49ers vs Commanders?
Brandon Aiyuk led the game with 24.4 PPR fantasy points, the WR5 of Week 17, on 7 catches for 114 yards and a touchdown. Deebo Samuel was next with 18.2 (WR13).
Who led 49ers vs Commanders in passing, rushing and receiving?
Brock Purdy (SF) led all passers with 22 of 28 for 230 yards and 2 touchdowns. Elijah Mitchell (SF) led in rushing with 17 carries for 80 yards and a touchdown. Brandon Aiyuk (SF) led in receiving with 7 catches for 114 yards and a touchdown.
How many fantasy points did Brandon Aiyuk score against the Commanders?
Brandon Aiyuk scored 24.4 points in PPR leagues, 20.9 in half-PPR and 17.4 in standard scoring against the Commanders in Week 17 of the 2023 season, on 7 catches for 114 yards and a touchdown. He drew 30% of his team's targets.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in 49ers vs Commanders?
Brandon Aiyuk outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 24.4 PPR points on 13.4 xFP (+11.0). Christian McCaffrey fell furthest short, with 13.1 points on 16.9 xFP (−3.8). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in 49ers vs Commanders?
Christian McCaffrey had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 16.9 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 13.1. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the 49ers beat the Commanders?
The 49ers beat the Commanders 27–10 because they averaged 6.0 yards per play to 5.2, won the turnover battle 2–0, and outgained them 408–225.
Which team won the turnover battle in 49ers vs Commanders?
The 49ers won the turnover battle 2–0: the Commanders gave the ball away 2 times and the 49ers not at all. The 49ers won the game.
What was the turning point of 49ers vs Commanders?
Sam Howell's 3-yard touchdown pass to Terry McLaurin with 4:33 left in the second quarter was the biggest swing of the game, moving the Commanders' win probability from 25% to 50%.
What is the all-time 49ers vs Commanders record?
The 49ers lead the all-time series 23–12–1 across 36 meetings since 1952, including a 3–1 record in the postseason.
When did the 49ers and Commanders last play before this game?
Before Week 17 of 2023, they last met in the 2022 season on December 24, 2022, when the 49ers beat the Commanders 37–20.
Have the 49ers and Commanders met in the playoffs?
Yes, 4 times, most recently in the 1992 playoffs. The 49ers are 3–1 against the Commanders in the postseason.
What is the 49ers vs Commanders record since 2021?
The 49ers lead 2–0 across 2 meetings since the 2021 season, including this game.
