Final2026 Week 3
Lambeau Field, Green Bay, WI|
Atlanta Falcons vs Green Bay Packers
Atlanta Falcons
AwayWon
35
Green Bay Packers
Home
14
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Falcons | 7 | 10 | 7 | 11 | 35 |
| Packers | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 14 |
ATL 35 · GB 14 Final
Passing leader
GB · QB
19.5PPR pts
28/53, 312 YDS, 2 TD, 1 INT
Top fantasy scorer
ATL · RB
35.3PPR pts
29 ATT, 194 YDS, 2 TD, 2 REC, 19 REC YDS
Packers leader
GB · WR
22.6PPR pts
7 REC, 96 YDS, 1 TD
Defensive playmaker
Xavier McKinney
GB
1 INT, 5 TKL
Falcons 35, Packers 14: Atlanta beats Green Bay
Atlanta led 17–7 at halftime and outscored Green Bay 18–7 after the break to win 35–14. The Falcons finished with a 498–328 edge in total offense and averaged 7.5 yards per play.
The Packers went 6-for-15 on third down and committed one turnover, while the Falcons kept the ball for 37:05.
Key advantages
- +2.3 yards/play ATL 7.5 · GB 5.2
- +170 total yards ATL 498 · GB 328
- +20% third-down rate ATL 60% · GB 40%
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Falcon or Packer on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Falcons Won
Atlanta won the efficiency, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Falcons | Stat | Packers |
|---|---|---|
| 7.5 | Yards per play | 5.2 |
| 498 | Total yards | 328 |
| 60% | Third-down conversion | 40% |
| Other team stats | ||
| 66 | Plays | 63 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 1 |
| 37:05 | Time of possession | 22:55 |
Scoring Summary
The Falcons scored four touchdowns and two field goals; the Packers scored two touchdowns.
| Time | Team | Play | ATL | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 5:13 | GB | Jordan Love → Christian Watson, 4-yard TD Takes leadTrey Smack XP | 0 | 7 |
| 1:32 | ATL | Bijan Robinson 3-yard TD run Ties gameNick Folk XP | 7 | 7 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 4:48 | ATL | Nick Folk 44-yard FG Takes lead | 10 | 7 |
| 0:59 | ATL | Michael Penix Jr. → Austin Hooper, 5-yard TD Extends leadNick Folk XP | 17 | 7 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 3:38 | ATL | Brian Robinson Jr. 7-yard TD run Extends leadNick Folk XP | 24 | 7 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 10:57 | ATL | Nick Folk 31-yard FG Extends lead | 27 | 7 |
| 8:18 | GB | Jordan Love → Matthew Golden, 15-yard TDTrey Smack XP | 27 | 14 |
| 3:33 | ATL | Bijan Robinson 2-yard TD run Extends leadMichael Penix Jr. → Chris Blair, 2-pt conversion | 35 | 14 |
Fantasy Points: Falcons vs Packers, Week 3 2026
Fantasy leaders
- Bijan RobinsonATL · RB35.3 PTSRB2
- Drake LondonATL · WR28.4 PTSWR2
- Christian WatsonGB · WR22.6 PTSWR6
- Matthew GoldenGB · WR21.0 PTSWR9
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.5 | QB16 | 28/53 | 312 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 75.4 | Start/Sit → | |
| 15.0 | QB21 | 18/25 | 256 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 101.4 |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35.3 | RB2 | RB | 29 | 194 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 28.4 | WR2 | WR | — | — | — | 10 | 9 | 194 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 22.6 | WR6 | WR | — | — | — | 10 | 7 | 96 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 21.0 | WR9 | WR | — | — | — | 12 | 5 | 100 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 11.0 | RB21 | RB | 10 | 50 | 1 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 9.1 | TE20 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 11 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.6 | TE29 | TE | — | — | — | 8 | 4 | 26 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.1 | WR66 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 3 | 31 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.2 | WR74 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 22 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.8 | RB49 | RB | 4 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.6 | TE38 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 16 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.9 | WR98 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.6 | RB59 | RB | 4 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.1 | WR102 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 11 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.7 | WR109 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.5 | TE58 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | ||
| 1.4 | RB67 | RB | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Atlanta Falcons
Snap Share
Drake LondonWR66 snaps93%
Bijan RobinsonRB51 snaps72%
Jahan DotsonWR47 snaps66%
Charlie WoernerTE43 snaps61%
Kyle PittsTE42 snaps59%
Target Share23 targets
- Drake London43%, 10 targets
- Jahan Dotson13%, 3 targets
- Austin Hooper9%, 2 targets
- Olamide Zaccheaus9%, 2 targets
- Kyle Pitts9%, 2 targets
- Other17%, 4 targets
Carry Share41 carries
- Bijan Robinson71%, 29 carries
- Brian Robinson24%, 10 carries
- Michael Penix5%, 2 carries
Green Bay Packers
Snap Share
Matthew GoldenWR54 snaps82%
Christian WatsonWR53 snaps80%
Tucker KraftTE50 snaps76%
Skyy MooreWR34 snaps52%
Chris BrooksRB27 snaps41%
Target Share51 targets
- Matthew Golden24%, 12 targets
- Christian Watson20%, 10 targets
- Tucker Kraft16%, 8 targets
- Skyy Moore14%, 7 targets
- Jonnu Smith6%, 3 targets
- Other22%, 11 targets
Carry Share9 carries
- MarShawn Lloyd44%, 4 carries
- Kaleb Johnson44%, 4 carries
- Jordan Love11%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 66 | 93% | 10 | 43% | 0 | |
| 54 | 82% | 12 | 24% | 0 | |
| 53 | 80% | 10 | 20% | 0 | |
| 50 | 76% | 8 | 16% | 0 | |
| 51 | 72% | 2 | 9% | 29 | |
| 47 | 66% | 3 | 13% | 0 | |
| 43 | 61% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 42 | 59% | 2 | 9% | 0 | |
| 34 | 52% | 7 | 14% | 0 | |
| 27 | 41% | 1 | 2% | 0 | |
| 24 | 36% | 3 | 6% | 4 | |
| 24 | 34% | 2 | 9% | 0 | |
| 22 | 33% | 3 | 6% | 0 | |
| 21 | 32% | 1 | 2% | 0 | |
| 21 | 32% | 3 | 6% | 0 | |
| 19 | 27% | 0 | 0% | 10 | |
| 17 | 24% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 15 | 23% | 3 | 6% | 4 | |
| 16 | 23% | 2 | 9% | 0 | |
| 13 | 18% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 13 | 18% | 2 | 9% | 0 | |
| 8 | 12% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+14.3Bijan Robinson35.3 PTS vs 21.0 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−7.4Tucker Kraft6.6 PTS vs 14.0 xFP
- Highest expected volume25.3 xFPJordan Love19.5 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan LoveGB · QB | 19.5 | 25.3 | −5.8 | 100% | 53 att | — | 53 | 1 | 11% | 0 | 0% |
| Bijan RobinsonATL · RB | 35.3 | 21.0 | +14.3 | 72% | 71% car | — | 0 | 29 | 71% | 2 | 9% |
| Matthew GoldenGB · WR | 21.0 | 21.0 | 0.0 | 82% | 24% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 12 | 24% |
| Christian WatsonGB · WR | 22.6 | 17.5 | +5.1 | 80% | 20% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 10 | 20% |
| Drake LondonATL · WR | 28.4 | 17.5 | +10.9 | 93% | 43% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 10 | 43% |
| Tucker KraftGB · TE | 6.6 | 14.0 | −7.4 | 76% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 16% |
| Michael Penix Jr.ATL · QB | 15.0 | 12.9 | +2.1 | 100% | 25 att | — | 25 | 2 | 5% | 0 | 0% |
| Skyy MooreGB · WR | 6.1 | 12.2 | −6.1 | 52% | 14% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 14% |
| Kaleb JohnsonGB · RB | 2.6 | 7.7 | −5.1 | 36% | 44% car | — | 0 | 4 | 44% | 3 | 6% |
| MarShawn LloydGB · RB | 3.8 | 7.7 | −3.9 | 23% | 44% car | — | 0 | 4 | 44% | 3 | 6% |
| Brian Robinson Jr.ATL · RB | 11.0 | 6.0 | +5.0 | 27% | 24% car | — | 0 | 10 | 24% | 0 | 0% |
| J. Michael SturdivantGB · WR | 5.2 | 5.2 | 0.0 | 32% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 6% |
| Jahan DotsonATL · WR | 2.1 | 5.2 | −3.1 | 66% | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 13% |
| Jonnu SmithGB · TE | 3.6 | 5.2 | −1.6 | 33% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 6% |
| Austin HooperATL · TE | 9.1 | 3.5 | +5.6 | 23% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 9% |
| Kyle Pitts Sr.ATL · TE | 1.5 | 3.5 | −2.0 | 59% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 9% |
| Olamide ZaccheausATL · WR | 2.9 | 3.5 | −0.6 | 34% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 9% |
| Zachariah BranchATL · WR | 1.7 | 3.5 | −1.8 | 18% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 9% |
| Bo MeltonGB · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 32% | 2% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 2% |
| Chris BrooksGB · RB | 1.4 | 1.7 | −0.3 | 41% | 2% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 2% |
Team totals: Falcons 23 targets and 41 carries; Packers 51 targets and 9 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2026 season: 1.75 PPR points per target (68% catch rate), 0.60 per carry and 0.47 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Michael Penix Jr.
ATL · QB · 15.0 pts on 12.9 expected
18 of 25 passing for 256 yards, 1 touchdown, 1 interception; 2 carries for -2 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 12.9 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Saints. Bet on the role more than the result.
Jordan Love Unlucky
GB · QB · 19.5 pts on 25.3 expected
28 of 53 passing for 312 yards, 2 touchdowns, 1 interception; 1 carry for 0 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 25.3 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't. Next up: Week 4 against the Buccaneers. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Jordan Love →Bijan Robinson Ran hot
ATL · RB · 35.3 pts on 21.0 expected
2 targets (9% of the team's), 2 catches for 19 yards; 29 carries (71% of the team's) for 194 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 21.0 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 4 against the Saints. Bet on the role more than the result.
Trend: Season high in carries (29).
Drake London Ran hot
ATL · WR · 28.4 pts on 17.5 expected
10 targets (43% of the team's), 9 catches for 194 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 17.5 points; efficiency supplied the rest. Next up: Week 4 against the Saints. Bet on the role more than the result.
Trend: Season high in targets (10).
Matthew Golden
GB · WR · 21.0 pts on 21.0 expected
12 targets (24% of the team's), 5 catches for 100 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 21.0 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Buccaneers. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Matthew Golden →Christian Watson Ran hot
GB · WR · 22.6 pts on 17.5 expected
10 targets (20% of the team's), 7 catches for 96 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 17.5 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 4 against the Buccaneers. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Christian Watson →Tucker Kraft Unlucky
GB · TE · 6.6 pts on 14.0 expected
8 targets (16% of the team's), 4 catches for 26 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 14.0 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't. Next up: Week 4 against the Buccaneers. Bet on the role more than the result.
Trend: Season high in targets (8).
Skyy Moore Unlucky
GB · WR · 6.1 pts on 12.2 expected
7 targets (14% of the team's), 3 catches for 31 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 12.2 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't. Next up: Week 4 against the Buccaneers. Bet on the role more than the result.
Trend: Season high in targets (7).
Start/Sit Decisions
Stock Up, Stock Down
Green Bay Packers
- ▲Stock up: Skyy Moore played 52% of the snaps, up from a 21% season average.
- ▲Stock up: J. Michael Sturdivant played 32% of the snaps, up from a 15% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Bo Melton played 32% of the snaps, up from a 14% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2026 through Week 3.
| Points allowed to | Falcons D | Packers D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 18.6 | 15.5 |
| RBs | 12.8 | 30.7 |
| WRs | 38.5 | 34.7 |
| TEs | 17.2 | 11.5 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Green Bay opened at 63% win probability, climbed as high as 81%, then lost.
Packers win probability
Key Swings
- +19Love → Watson, 4-yd TD62% → 81%Q1 5:13
- −20Robinson 3-yd TD run81% → 62%Q1 1:32
- −12Folk 44-yd FG60% → 48%Q2 4:48
- −26Penix → Hooper, 5-yd TD47% → 21%Q2 0:59
- −11Robinson 7-yd TD run13% → 2%Q3 3:38
Swing in Packers win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Atlanta Falcons | Measure | Green Bay Packers |
|---|---|---|
| 66 | Plays | 63 |
| 38% | Pass rate | 86% |
| 10.2 | Yds / dropback | 5.8 |
| 5.9 | Yds / carry | 1.9 |
| 6/10 | Third downs | 6/15 |
Efficiency edge Atlanta ran 3 more plays and gained 4.4 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- ATL London 43% · Dotson 13% · Hooper 9%
- GB Golden 24% · Watson 20% · Kraft 16%
Possession Results
| Result | ATL | GB |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 4 | 2 |
| Field goals | 2 | 0 |
| Punts | 2 | 5 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 1 |
| Turnovers on downs | 0 | 1 |
| Missed field goals | 0 | 1 |
- The Packers opened the scoring on their second possession, a 9-play, 87-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
- The Falcons drained the clock with three second-half drives of four to seven minutes.
All 21 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATL | Q1 15:00 | 4 | 21 | 1:33 | Interception |
| GB | Q1 13:27 | 3 | 1 | 0:54 | Punt |
| ATL | Q1 12:33 | 5 | 9 | 2:27 | Punt |
| GB | Q1 10:06 | 9 | 87 | 4:53 | Touchdown |
| ATL | Q1 5:13 | 7 | 85 | 3:41 | Touchdown |
| GB | Q1 1:32 | 3 | 6 | 1:44 | Punt |
| ATL | Q2 14:48 | 7 | 42 | 4:14 | Punt |
| GB | Q2 10:34 | 3 | 1 | 0:59 | Punt |
| ATL | Q2 9:35 | 8 | 38 | 4:47 | Field goal |
| GB | Q2 4:48 | 4 | 39 | 1:06 | Missed FG |
| ATL | Q2 3:42 | 8 | 63 | 2:43 | Touchdown |
| GB | Q2 0:59 | 3 | 8 | 0:31 | Punt |
| ATL | Q2 0:28 | 2 | 0 | 0:28 | End of half |
| GB | Q3 15:00 | 10 | 63 | 5:04 | Downs |
| ATL | Q3 9:56 | 10 | 92 | 6:18 | Touchdown |
| GB | Q3 3:38 | 7 | 18 | 2:43 | Punt |
| ATL | Q3 0:55 | 7 | 79 | 4:58 | Field goal |
| GB | Q4 10:57 | 10 | 76 | 2:39 | Touchdown |
| ATL | Q4 8:18 | 8 | 67 | 4:45 | Touchdown |
| GB | Q4 3:33 | 12 | 58 | 2:22 | Interception |
| ATL | Q4 1:11 | 2 | -2 | 1:11 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Falcons vs Packers Head-to-Head
The Falcons and Packers first met in 1966 and have played 37 times since.
- All-time series
- 19–18Packers lead, 37 meetings since 1966
- Postseason
- 2–2Split 2–2
- Largest Falcons win
- 44–212016
- Largest Packers win
- 56–31966
Since 2021
2–0 Falcons lead
2 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- F
- F
Oldest to newest. F = Falcons win, P = Packers win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2026 Wk 3 Falcons at Packers ATL 35 GB 14 ATL W
- 2023 Wk 2 Packers at Falcons, 2023 Wk 2 recap ATL 25 GB 24 ATL W
Season to Date (Through Week 3)
The 2026 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Falcons | Stat | Packers |
|---|---|---|
| 1-2 | Record | 1-2 |
| 17.0 | Points per game | 18.7 |
| 340.7 | Yards per game | 315.3 |
| 5.4 | Yards per play | 5.3 |
| 22.7 | Points allowed per game | 30.3 |
| 310.7 | Yards allowed per game | 340.7 |
Falcons vs Packers Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- GB −4.5Packers failed to cover by 25.5
- Total
- 43.5Over: 49 points scored (by 5.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Packers | 24.0 | 14 | −10.0 |
| Falcons | 19.5 | 35 | +15.5 |
The Falcons beat their implied total and the Packers fell short of theirs; the Fantasy tab has the player lines behind it.
Betting Trends
Each team's 2026 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Atlanta Falcons
- Against the spread
- 1–2
- Over/under
- 1–2
- ATS as underdog
- 1–2
- ATS on the road
- 1–1
Green Bay Packers
- Against the spread
- 0–3
- Over/under
- 2–1
- ATS as favorite
- 0–2
- ATS as underdog
- 0–1
- ATS at home
- 0–1
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Falcons and Packers in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Falcon or a Packer, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Falcons or Packers player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Falcons and Packers players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Falcons and Packers defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2026 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Falcons vs Packers Game FAQ
Who won the 2026 Falcons vs Packers Week 3 game?
The Atlanta Falcons beat the Green Bay Packers 35–14 in Week 3 of the 2026 season. The game was played at Lambeau Field in Green Bay, WI, on September 24, 2026. See the Falcons' 2026 schedule.
What was the final score of Falcons vs Packers?
The final score was Falcons 35, Packers 14. The Falcons led 17–7 at halftime, and the second half went Falcons 18, Packers 7.
What happened in the Falcons vs Packers game?
Atlanta led 17–7 at halftime and outscored Green Bay 18–7 after the break to win 35–14. The Falcons finished with a 498–328 edge in total offense and averaged 7.5 yards per play. Bijan Robinson led all players with 2 catches for 19 yards, plus 29 carries for 194 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Falcons vs Packers?
Bijan Robinson led the game with 35.3 PPR fantasy points, the RB2 of Week 3, on 2 catches for 19 yards, plus 29 carries for 194 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. Drake London was next with 28.4 (WR2). See Bijan Robinson's 2026 game log.
Who led Falcons vs Packers in passing, rushing and receiving?
Jordan Love (GB) led all passers with 28 of 53 for 312 yards, 2 touchdowns and an interception. Bijan Robinson (ATL) led in rushing with 29 carries for 194 yards and 2 touchdowns. Drake London (ATL) led in receiving with 9 catches for 194 yards.
How many fantasy points did Bijan Robinson score against the Packers?
Bijan Robinson scored 35.3 points in PPR leagues, 34.3 in half-PPR and 33.3 in standard scoring against the Packers in Week 3 of the 2026 season, on 2 catches for 19 yards, plus 29 carries for 194 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. He handled 71% of his team's carries.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Falcons vs Packers?
Bijan Robinson outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 35.3 PPR points on 21.0 xFP (+14.3). Tucker Kraft fell furthest short, with 6.6 points on 14.0 xFP (−7.4). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Falcons vs Packers?
Jordan Love had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 25.3 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 19.5. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Falcons come back to beat the Packers?
The Falcons' chances of winning fell as low as 19% in the first half. Michael Penix Jr.'s 5-yard touchdown pass to Austin Hooper in the second quarter was the biggest swing of the game. They finished the comeback with a 35–14 win.
What is the all-time Falcons vs Packers record?
The Packers lead the all-time series 19–18 across 37 meetings since 1966, including a 2–2 record in the postseason.
When did the Falcons and Packers last play before this game?
Before Week 3 of 2026, they last met in the 2023 season on September 17, 2023, when the Falcons beat the Packers 25–24.
Have the Falcons and Packers met in the playoffs?
Yes, 4 times, most recently in the 2016 playoffs. The Falcons are 2–2 against the Packers in the postseason.
What was the closing spread for Falcons vs Packers?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Packers −4.5, making the Green Bay Packers 4.5-point favorites, with a closing total of 43.5. That implied about 24.0 points for the Packers and 19.5 for the Falcons.
Did Falcons vs Packers go over or under the total?
The game went over. The consensus closing total was 43.5, and the teams combined for 49 points, 5.5 over the number.
Who covered the spread in Falcons vs Packers?
The Falcons covered as 4.5-point underdogs against the closing line of Packers −4.5. The final margin was 21 points.
