Final2025 Week 9
Paycor Stadium, Cincinnati, OH|
Chicago Bears vs Cincinnati Bengals
Chicago Bears
AwayWon
47
Cincinnati Bengals
Home
42
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bears | 7 | 10 | 14 | 16 | 47 |
| Bengals | 10 | 10 | 7 | 15 | 42 |
CHI 47 · CIN 42 Final
Passing leader
CIN · QB
32.7PPR pts
31/47, 470 YDS, 4 TD, 2 INT
Top fantasy scorer
CIN · WR
33.1PPR pts
7 REC, 121 YDS, 2 TD
Bengals leader
CIN · RB
19.2PPR pts
11 ATT, 37 YDS, 8 REC, 75 REC YDS
Defensive playmaker
Tremaine Edmunds
CHI
1 INT, 9 TKL
Bears 47, Bengals 42: Chicago rallies from 3 down at halftime
Chicago erased a 20–17 halftime deficit, outscoring Cincinnati 30–22 after the break to win 47–42. The Bears finished with a 576–495 edge in total offense.
The Bengals went 5-for-10 on third down and committed three turnovers, while the Bears kept the ball for 34:30 and finished without a giveaway.
Key advantages
- +3 turnover margin CHI 0 turnovers
- +81 total yards CHI 576 · CIN 495
- +3% third-down rate CHI 53% · CIN 50%
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Bear or Bengal on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Bears Won
Chicago won the turnover, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Bears | Stat | Bengals |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Turnovers | 3 |
| 576 | Total yards | 495 |
| 53% | Third-down conversion | 50% |
| Other team stats | ||
| 7.6 | Yards per play | 7.6 |
| 76 | Plays | 65 |
| 34:30 | Time of possession | 25:30 |
Scoring Summary
The Bears scored six touchdowns and two field goals; the Bengals scored five touchdowns and two field goals.
| Time | Team | Play | CHI | CIN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 14:49 | CIN | Charlie Jones 98-yard kickoff return TD Takes leadEvan McPherson XP | 0 | 7 |
| 8:44 | CHI | DJ Moore → Caleb Williams, 2-yard TD Ties gameCairo Santos XP | 7 | 7 |
| 5:41 | CIN | Evan McPherson 41-yard FG Takes lead | 7 | 10 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 14:54 | CHI | Caleb Williams → Olamide Zaccheaus, 15-yard TD Takes leadCairo Santos XP | 14 | 10 |
| 5:47 | CIN | Evan McPherson 33-yard FG | 14 | 13 |
| 1:29 | CHI | Cairo Santos 24-yard FG Extends lead | 17 | 13 |
| 1:12 | CIN | Joe Flacco → Tee Higgins, 44-yard TD Takes leadEvan McPherson XP | 17 | 20 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 8:11 | CHI | Caleb Williams → Colston Loveland, 5-yard TD Takes leadCairo Santos XP | 24 | 20 |
| 5:19 | CIN | Joe Flacco → Tee Higgins, 2-yard TD Takes leadEvan McPherson XP | 24 | 27 |
| 1:57 | CHI | Brittain Brown 22-yard TD run Takes leadCairo Santos XP | 31 | 27 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 12:03 | CHI | Cairo Santos 36-yard FG Extends lead | 34 | 27 |
| 4:53 | CHI | DJ Moore 17-yard TD run Extends leadCairo Santos XP | 41 | 27 |
| 1:43 | CIN | Joe Flacco → Noah Fant, 23-yard TDJoe Flacco → Tee Higgins, 2-pt conversion | 41 | 35 |
| 0:54 | CIN | Joe Flacco → Andrei Iosivas, 9-yard TD Takes leadEvan McPherson XP | 41 | 42 |
| 0:17 | CHI | Caleb Williams → Colston Loveland, 58-yard TD Game winner2-pt try failed | 47 | 42 |
Fantasy Points: Bears vs Bengals, Week 9 2025
Fantasy leaders
- Caleb WilliamsCHI · QB38.7 PTSQB1
- Tee HigginsCIN · WR33.1 PTSWR2
- Joe FlaccoCIN · QB32.7 PTSQB2
- Colston LovelandCHI · TE29.8 PTSTE2
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32.7 | QB2 | 31/47 | 470 | 4 | 2 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 109.4 | Start/Sit → | |
| 38.7 | QB1 | 20/34 | 280 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 53 | 0 | 114.8 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.8 | QB30 | 1/1 | 20 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | 118.8 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33.1 | WR2 | WR | — | — | — | 9 | 7 | 121 | 2 | Start/Sit → | |
| 29.8 | TE2 | TE | — | — | — | 7 | 6 | 118 | 2 | Start/Sit → | |
| 23.0 | WR4 | WR | 1 | 17 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 72 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 22.8 | RB3 | RB | 26 | 176 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 22 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 19.2 | RB6 | RB | 11 | 37 | 0 | 14 | 8 | 75 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 18.0 | WR13 | WR | 1 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 66 | 1 | ||
| 17.8 | WR14 | WR | — | — | — | 8 | 6 | 58 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 17.1 | WR16 | WR | — | — | — | 8 | 6 | 111 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 10.8 | TE15 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 28 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.7 | RB23 | RB | 5 | 37 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 6.2 | TE31 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 42 | 0 | ||
| 3.7 | WR67 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 27 | 0 | ||
| 2.0 | TE48 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 10 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.5 | RB63 | RB | 1 | 5 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.1 | RB67 | RB | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Rome OdunzeWR80 snaps100%
DJ MooreWR68 snaps85%
Colston LovelandTE65 snaps81%
Kyle MonangaiRB59 snaps74%
Olamide ZaccheausWR51 snaps64%
Target Share32 targets
- Olamide Zaccheaus25%, 8 targets
- Colston Loveland22%, 7 targets
- DJ Moore19%, 6 targets
- Kyle Monangai16%, 5 targets
- Rome Odunze9%, 3 targets
- Other9%, 3 targets
Carry Share37 carries
- Kyle Monangai70%, 26 carries
- Brittain Brown14%, 5 carries
- Caleb Williams14%, 5 carries
- DJ Moore3%, 1 carries
Cincinnati Bengals
Snap Share
Ja'Marr ChaseWR67 snaps99%
Chase BrownRB65 snaps96%
Andrei IosivasWR57 snaps84%
Tee HigginsWR56 snaps82%
Noah FantTE31 snaps46%
Target Share45 targets
- Chase Brown31%, 14 targets
- Tee Higgins20%, 9 targets
- Ja'Marr Chase18%, 8 targets
- Andrei Iosivas16%, 7 targets
- Noah Fant7%, 3 targets
- Other9%, 4 targets
Carry Share15 carries
- Chase Brown73%, 11 carries
- Joe Flacco7%, 1 carries
- Samaje Perine7%, 1 carries
- Andrei Iosivas7%, 1 carries
- Tahj Brooks7%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80 | 100% | 3 | 9% | 0 | |
| 67 | 99% | 8 | 18% | 0 | |
| 65 | 96% | 14 | 31% | 11 | |
| 68 | 85% | 6 | 19% | 1 | |
| 57 | 84% | 7 | 16% | 1 | |
| 56 | 82% | 9 | 20% | 0 | |
| 65 | 81% | 7 | 22% | 0 | |
| 59 | 74% | 5 | 16% | 26 | |
| 51 | 64% | 8 | 25% | 0 | |
| 31 | 46% | 3 | 7% | 0 | |
| 31 | 46% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 23 | 29% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 21 | 26% | 2 | 6% | 0 | |
| 17 | 25% | 2 | 4% | 0 | |
| 14 | 18% | 1 | 3% | 5 | |
| 11 | 16% | 2 | 4% | 0 | |
| 5 | 6% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 3 | 4% | 0 | 0% | 1 | |
| 3 | 4% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 2 | 3% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 1% | 0 | 0% | 1 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+17.9Colston Loveland29.8 PTS vs 11.9 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−11.8Chase Brown19.2 PTS vs 31.0 xFP
- Highest expected volume31.0 xFPChase Brown19.2 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chase BrownCIN · RB | 19.2 | 31.0 | −11.8 | 96% | 73% car | — | 0 | 11 | 73% | 14 | 31% |
| Kyle MonangaiCHI · RB | 22.8 | 25.3 | −2.5 | 74% | 70% car | — | 0 | 26 | 70% | 5 | 15% |
| Caleb WilliamsCHI · QB | 38.7 | 21.7 | +17.0 | 100% | 34 att | — | 34 | 5 | 14% | 2 | 6% |
| Joe FlaccoCIN · QB | 32.7 | 21.5 | +11.2 | 100% | 47 att | — | 47 | 1 | 7% | 0 | 0% |
| Tee HigginsCIN · WR | 33.1 | 15.3 | +17.8 | 82% | 20% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 9 | 20% |
| Ja'Marr ChaseCIN · WR | 17.1 | 13.6 | +3.5 | 99% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 18% |
| Olamide ZaccheausCHI · WR | 17.8 | 13.6 | +4.2 | 64% | 24% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 24% |
| Andrei IosivasCIN · WR | 18.0 | 12.6 | +5.4 | 84% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 7% | 7 | 16% |
| Colston LovelandCHI · TE | 29.8 | 11.9 | +17.9 | 81% | 21% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 21% |
| DJ MooreCHI · WR | 23.0 | 11.3 | +11.7 | 85% | 18% tgt | — | 1 | 1 | 3% | 6 | 18% |
| Noah FantCIN · TE | 10.8 | 5.1 | +5.7 | 46% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 7% |
| Rome OdunzeCHI · WR | 0.0 | 5.1 | −5.1 | 100% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 9% |
| Brittain BrownCHI · RB | 9.7 | 4.9 | +4.8 | 18% | 14% car | — | 0 | 5 | 14% | 1 | 3% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 2.0 | 3.9 | −1.9 | 26% | 6% tgt | — | 1 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
| Mitchell TinsleyCIN · WR | 3.7 | 3.4 | +0.3 | 25% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 4% |
| Tanner HudsonCIN · TE | 6.2 | 3.4 | +2.8 | 16% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 4% |
| Samaje PerineCIN · RB | 0.5 | 0.6 | −0.1 | 1% | 7% car | — | 0 | 1 | 7% | 0 | 0% |
| Tahj BrooksCIN · RB | 0.1 | 0.6 | −0.5 | 4% | 7% car | — | 0 | 1 | 7% | 0 | 0% |
| Tyson BagentCHI · QB | 0.8 | 0.4 | +0.4 | 1% | 1 att | — | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Bears 34 targets and 37 carries; Bengals 45 targets and 15 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2025 season: 1.70 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.65 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Caleb Williams Ran hot
CHI · QB · 38.7 pts on 21.7 expected
20 of 34 passing for 280 yards, 3 touchdowns; 2 targets (6% of the team's), 2 catches for 22 yards and 1 touchdown; 5 carries for 53 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 21.7 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 29.1, 12.8, 19.9, 5.7, 12.8, 38.7
W3W4W6W7W8W9
Best fantasy game of the season.
Joe Flacco Ran hot
CIN · QB · 32.7 pts on 21.5 expected
31 of 47 passing for 470 yards, 4 touchdowns, 2 interceptions; 1 carry for -1 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 21.5 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 4.7, 3.3, 18.8, 26.0, 24.3, 32.7
W3W4W6W7W8W9
Best fantasy game of the season.
Kyle Monangai Volume, no payoff
CHI · RB · 22.8 pts on 25.3 expected
5 targets (15% of the team's), 3 catches for 22 yards; 26 carries (70% of the team's) for 176 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 25.3 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 3.0, 1.8, 5.4, 17.4, 2.4, 22.8
W3W4W6W7W8W9
Season high in carries (26). Best fantasy game of the season.
Olamide Zaccheaus
CHI · WR · 17.8 pts on 13.6 expected
8 targets (24% of the team's), 6 catches for 58 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 13.6 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 6.6, 9.1, 4.8, 2.9, 10.3, 17.8
W3W4W6W7W8W9
Season high in targets (8). Best fantasy game of the season.
Chase Brown Volume, no payoff
CIN · RB · 19.2 pts on 31.0 expected
14 targets (31% of the team's), 8 catches for 75 yards; 11 carries (73% of the team's) for 37 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 31.0 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 10.1, 11.8, 8.9, 12.0, 25.5, 19.2
W4W5W6W7W8W9
Season high in targets (14).
Tee Higgins Ran hot
CIN · WR · 33.1 pts on 15.3 expected
9 targets (20% of the team's), 7 catches for 121 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 15.3 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 6.2, 11.2, 11.2, 21.6, 11.4, 33.1
W4W5W6W7W8W9
Best fantasy game of the season. A touchdown in 5 of the last 8 games.
Andrei Iosivas Ran hot
CIN · WR · 18.0 pts on 12.6 expected
7 targets (16% of the team's), 5 catches for 66 yards and 1 touchdown; 1 carry (7% of the team's) for 4 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 12.6 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 3.7, 13.2, 1.5, 7.9, 0.0, 18.0
W4W5W6W7W8W9
Best fantasy game of the season.
Colston Loveland Ran hot
CHI · TE · 29.8 pts on 11.9 expected
7 targets (21% of the team's), 6 catches for 118 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 11.9 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 0.0, 4.1, 3.1, 5.4, 6.8, 29.8
W2W3W6W7W8W9
Season high in targets (7). Best fantasy game of the season.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Chicago Bears
- ▲Stock up: Kyle Monangai played 74% of the snaps, up from a 34% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Colston Loveland played 81% of the snaps, up from a 52% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Cole Kmet played 26% of the snaps, down from a 77% season average.
Cincinnati Bengals
- ▲Stock up: Chase Brown played 96% of the snaps, up from a 62% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Samaje Perine played 1% of the snaps, down from a 36% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2025 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Bears D | Bengals D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 19.1 | 18.8 |
| RBs | 21.7 | 28.4 |
| WRs | 35.5 | 25.4 |
| TEs | 13.1 | 20.7 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Cincinnati opened at 50% win probability, climbed as high as 86%, then lost.
Bengals win probability
Key Swings
- −32Williams → Loveland, 5-yd TD64% → 32%Q3 8:11
- +34Flacco → Higgins, 2-yd TD31% → 65%Q3 5:19
- −37Brown 22-yd TD run66% → 29%Q3 1:57
- +73Flacco → Iosivas, 9-yd TD<1% → 73%Q4 0:54
- −86Williams → Loveland, 58-yd TD86% → <1%Q4 0:17
Swing in Bengals win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Chicago Bears | Measure | Cincinnati Bengals |
|---|---|---|
| 76 | Plays | 65 |
| 51% | Pass rate | 77% |
| 7.5 | Yds / dropback | 9.0 |
| 7.6 | Yds / carry | 3.1 |
| 8/15 | Third downs | 5/10 |
Efficiency edge Chicago ran 11 more plays and gained 4.5 more yards per carry.
- Top targets
- CHI Zaccheaus 24% · Loveland 21% · Moore 18%
- CIN Brown 31% · Higgins 20% · Chase 18%
Possession Results
| Result | CHI | CIN |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 6 | 5 |
| Field goals | 2 | 2 |
| Punts | 2 | 1 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 3 |
| Missed field goals | 1 | 1 |
CHI turnover edge: +3
- The Bengals opened the scoring on their first possession, a 0-play, 0-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
- The Bears scored touchdowns on two of their first three drives.
All 24 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | Q1 15:00 | 0 | 0 | 0:11 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q1 14:49 | 12 | 73 | 6:05 | Touchdown |
| CIN | Q1 8:44 | 7 | 32 | 3:03 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q1 5:41 | 11 | 74 | 5:47 | Touchdown |
| CIN | Q2 14:54 | 3 | -2 | 2:42 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 12:12 | 3 | 8 | 2:05 | Punt |
| CIN | Q2 10:07 | 11 | 70 | 4:20 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q2 5:47 | 11 | 59 | 4:18 | Field goal |
| CIN | Q2 1:29 | 2 | 63 | 0:17 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 1:12 | 10 | 51 | 1:09 | Missed FG |
| CIN | Q2 0:03 | 1 | -1 | 0:03 | End of half |
| CHI | Q3 15:00 | 12 | 77 | 6:49 | Touchdown |
| CIN | Q3 8:11 | 6 | 69 | 2:52 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q3 5:19 | 6 | 74 | 3:22 | Touchdown |
| CIN | Q3 1:57 | 4 | 11 | 2:03 | Fumble |
| CHI | Q4 14:54 | 5 | 20 | 2:51 | Field goal |
| CIN | Q4 12:03 | 13 | 38 | 6:10 | Missed FG |
| CHI | Q4 5:53 | 2 | 56 | 1:00 | Touchdown |
| CIN | Q4 4:53 | 8 | 62 | 2:11 | Interception |
| CHI | Q4 2:42 | 3 | 5 | 0:27 | Punt |
| CIN | Q4 2:15 | 4 | 55 | 0:32 | Touchdown |
| CIN | Q4 1:43 | 6 | 57 | 0:49 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q4 0:54 | 4 | 72 | 0:37 | Touchdown |
| CIN | Q4 0:17 | 3 | 13 | 0:17 | Interception |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Bears vs Bengals Head-to-Head
The Bears and Bengals first met in 1972 and have played 13 times since.
- All-time series
- 7–6Bears lead, 13 meetings since 1972
- Postseason
- 0No playoff meetings
- Largest Bears win
- 44–71986
- Largest Bengals win
- 45–102009
Since 2021
2–0 Bears lead
2 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- CHI
- CHI
Oldest to newest. CHI = Bears win, CIN = Bengals win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wk 9 Bears at Bengals, 2025 Wk 9 recap CHI 47 CIN 42 CHI W
- 2021 Wk 2 Bengals at Bears, 2021 Wk 2 recap CHI 20 CIN 17 CHI W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2025 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Bears | Stat | Bengals |
|---|---|---|
| 11-6 | Record | 6-11 |
| 25.9 | Points per game | 24.4 |
| 369.5 | Yards per game | 329.2 |
| 5.7 | Yards per play | 5.3 |
| 24.4 | Points allowed per game | 28.9 |
| 361.8 | Yards allowed per game | 380.9 |
Bears and Bengals in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Bear or a Bengal, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Bears or Bengals player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Bears and Bengals players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Bears and Bengals defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2025 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Bears vs Bengals Game FAQ
Who won the 2025 Bears vs Bengals Week 9 game?
The Chicago Bears beat the Cincinnati Bengals 47–42 in Week 9 of the 2025 season. The game was played at Paycor Stadium in Cincinnati, OH, on November 2, 2025. See the Bears' 2025 schedule.
What was the final score of Bears vs Bengals?
The final score was Bears 47, Bengals 42. The Bengals led 20–17 at halftime, and the second half went Bears 30, Bengals 22.
What happened in the Bears vs Bengals game?
Chicago erased a 20–17 halftime deficit, outscoring Cincinnati 30–22 after the break to win 47–42. The Bears finished with a 576–495 edge in total offense. Caleb Williams led all players with 20 of 34 passing for 280 yards and 3 touchdowns, plus 5 carries for 53 rushing yards. The Bengals committed 3 turnovers, the Bears none.
What was the game-winning score in Bears vs Bengals?
Caleb Williams' 58-yard touchdown pass to Colston Loveland with 0:17 left in the fourth quarter gave the Bears a 47–42 lead they never gave up. It was the final score of the game.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Bears vs Bengals?
Caleb Williams led the game with 38.7 PPR fantasy points, the QB1 of Week 9, on 20 of 34 passing for 280 yards and 3 touchdowns, plus 5 carries for 53 rushing yards. Tee Higgins was next with 33.1 (WR2). See Caleb Williams's 2025 game log.
Who led Bears vs Bengals in passing, rushing and receiving?
Joe Flacco (CIN) led all passers with 31 of 47 for 470 yards, 4 touchdowns and 2 interceptions. Kyle Monangai (CHI) led in rushing with 26 carries for 176 yards. Tee Higgins (CIN) led in receiving with 7 catches for 121 yards and 2 touchdowns.
How many fantasy points did Caleb Williams score against the Bengals?
Caleb Williams scored 38.7 fantasy points against the Bengals in Week 9 of the 2025 season, the same in PPR, half-PPR and standard scoring because he had no catches, on 20 of 34 passing for 280 yards and 3 touchdowns, plus 5 carries for 53 rushing yards.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Bears vs Bengals?
Colston Loveland outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 29.8 PPR points on 11.9 xFP (+17.9). Chase Brown fell furthest short, with 19.2 points on 31.0 xFP (−11.8). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Bears vs Bengals?
Chase Brown had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 31.0 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 19.2. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Bears come back to beat the Bengals?
The Bears' chances of winning fell as low as 14% in the fourth quarter. Caleb Williams' 58-yard touchdown pass to Colston Loveland in the fourth quarter was the biggest swing of the game. Caleb Williams' 58-yard touchdown pass to Colston Loveland then put them ahead for good.
Which team won the turnover battle in Bears vs Bengals?
The Bears won the turnover battle 3–0: the Bengals gave the ball away 3 times and the Bears not at all. The Bears won the game.
What was the turning point of Bears vs Bengals?
Caleb Williams' 58-yard touchdown pass to Colston Loveland with 0:17 left in the fourth quarter was the biggest swing of the game, moving the Bengals' win probability from 86% to <1%.
What is the all-time Bears vs Bengals record?
The Bears lead the all-time series 7–6 across 13 meetings since 1972.
When did the Bears and Bengals last play before this game?
Before Week 9 of 2025, they last met in the 2021 season on September 19, 2021, when the Bears beat the Bengals 20–17.
What is the Bears vs Bengals record since 2021?
The Bears lead 2–0 across 2 meetings since the 2021 season, including this game.
