Final2021 Week 4
Soldier Field, Chicago, IL|
Detroit Lions vs Chicago Bears, Week 4 2021
Detroit Lions
Away
14
Chicago Bears
HomeWon
24
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lions | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 14 |
| Bears | 7 | 7 | 10 | 0 | 24 |
DET 14 · CHI 24 Final
Passing leader
DET · QB
16.8PPR pts
24/38, 299 YDS, 2 TD
Top fantasy scorer
CHI · RB
22.6PPR pts
23 ATT, 106 YDS, 2 TD
Lions leader
DET · WR
19.6PPR pts
3 REC, 46 YDS, 2 TD
Defensive playmaker
Amani Oruwariye
DET
1 INT, 6 TKL
Bears 24, Lions 14: Chicago beats Detroit
Chicago led 14–0 at halftime and won 24–14, though Detroit took the second half 14–10. The Bears finished with a narrow 373–351 edge in total offense and averaged 6.5 yards per play.
Detroit didn't get on the board until the third quarter.
The Lions went 4-for-11 on third down and committed two turnovers.
The two teams meet again in Week 12 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +1.3 yards/play CHI 6.5 · DET 5.2
- +1 turnover margin CHI 1 · DET 2 turnovers
- +22 total yards CHI 373 · DET 351
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Lion or Bear on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Bears Won
Chicago won the efficiency and turnover battles.
| Lions | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 5.2 | Yards per play | 6.5 |
| 2 | Turnovers | 1 |
| 351 | Total yards | 373 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 67 | Plays | 57 |
| 36% | Third-down conversion | 13% |
| 31:17 | Time of possession | 28:43 |
Scoring Summary
The Bears scored three touchdowns and one field goal; the Lions scored two touchdowns.
| Time | Team | Play | DET | CHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 8:49 | CHI | David Montgomery 4-yard TD run Takes leadCairo Santos XP | 0 | 7 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 14:51 | CHI | David Montgomery 9-yard TD run Extends leadCairo Santos XP | 0 | 14 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 10:33 | CHI | Damien Williams 4-yard TD run Extends leadCairo Santos XP | 0 | 21 |
| 3:19 | DET | Jared Goff → Kalif Raymond, 4-yard TDRyan Santoso XP | 7 | 21 |
| 0:10 | CHI | Cairo Santos 33-yard FG Extends lead | 7 | 24 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 11:17 | DET | Jared Goff → Kalif Raymond, 25-yard TDRyan Santoso XP | 14 | 24 |
Fantasy Points: Lions vs Bears, Week 4 2021
Fantasy leaders
- David MontgomeryCHI · RB22.6 PTSRB5
- Kalif RaymondDET · WR19.6 PTSWR11
- Darnell MooneyCHI · WR18.5 PTSWR15
- Damien WilliamsCHI · RB15.0 PTSRB21
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13.8 | QB23 | 24/38 | 299 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 105.0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.3 | QB32 | 11/17 | 209 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 82.7 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.6 | RB5 | RB | 23 | 106 | 2 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 19.6 | WR11 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 3 | 46 | 2 | Start/Sit → | |
| 18.5 | WR15 | WR | 1 | 10 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 125 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 15.0 | RB21 | RB | 8 | 55 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | ||
| 13.0 | WR33 | WR | — | — | — | 8 | 6 | 70 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 12.3 | WR36 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 83 | 0 | ||
| 9.3 | WR54 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 63 | 0 | ||
| 8.9 | RB36 | RB | 8 | 16 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 33 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.2 | TE21 | TE | — | — | — | 8 | 4 | 42 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.6 | RB46 | RB | 14 | 66 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 3.2 | WR89 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 12 | 0 | ||
| 2.3 | WR101 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | ||
| 1.6 | TE54 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.7 | RB72 | RB | 3 | 7 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.1 | WR116 | WR | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fantasy Usage
Detroit Lions
Snap Share
Quintez CephusWR62 snaps87%
T.J. HockensonTE58 snaps82%
Kalif RaymondWR53 snaps75%
D'Andre SwiftRB52 snaps73%
Amon-Ra St. BrownWR51 snaps72%
Target Share37 targets
- T.J. Hockenson22%, 8 targets
- Amon-Ra St. Brown22%, 8 targets
- Kalif Raymond16%, 6 targets
- D'Andre Swift16%, 6 targets
- Quintez Cephus14%, 5 targets
- Other11%, 4 targets
Carry Share25 carries
- Jamaal Williams56%, 14 carries
- D'Andre Swift32%, 8 carries
- Jared Goff12%, 3 carries
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Cole KmetTE57 snaps98%
Darnell MooneyWR41 snaps71%
Allen RobinsonWR40 snaps69%
David MontgomeryRB36 snaps62%
Marquise GoodwinWR29 snaps50%
Target Share17 targets
- Darnell Mooney41%, 7 targets
- Allen Robinson18%, 3 targets
- Cole Kmet18%, 3 targets
- Marquise Goodwin12%, 2 targets
- Damien Williams12%, 2 targets
Carry Share39 carries
- David Montgomery59%, 23 carries
- Damien Williams21%, 8 carries
- Justin Fields8%, 3 carries
- Khalil Herbert8%, 3 carries
- Marquise Goodwin3%, 1 carries
- Other3%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57 | 98% | 3 | 18% | 0 | |
| 62 | 87% | 5 | 14% | 0 | |
| 58 | 82% | 8 | 22% | 0 | |
| 53 | 75% | 6 | 16% | 0 | |
| 52 | 73% | 6 | 16% | 8 | |
| 51 | 72% | 8 | 22% | 0 | |
| 41 | 71% | 7 | 41% | 1 | |
| 40 | 69% | 3 | 18% | 0 | |
| 36 | 62% | 0 | 0% | 23 | |
| 29 | 50% | 2 | 12% | 1 | |
| 22 | 38% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 19 | 33% | 2 | 12% | 8 | |
| 21 | 30% | 0 | 0% | 14 | |
| 20 | 28% | 3 | 8% | 0 | |
| 16 | 28% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 19 | 27% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 11 | 19% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 9 | 16% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 7 | 12% | 0 | 0% | 3 | |
| 8 | 11% | 1 | 3% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+9.5Kalif Raymond19.6 PTS vs 10.1 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−6.3D'Andre Swift8.9 PTS vs 15.2 xFP
- Highest expected volume18.6 xFPJared Goff16.8 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jared GoffDET · QB | 16.8 | 18.6 | −1.8 | 100% | 38 att | — | 38 | 3 | 12% | 0 | 0% |
| D'Andre SwiftDET · RB | 8.9 | 15.2 | −6.3 | 73% | 32% car | — | 0 | 8 | 32% | 6 | 16% |
| David MontgomeryCHI · RB | 22.6 | 14.8 | +7.8 | 62% | 59% car | — | 0 | 23 | 59% | 0 | 0% |
| Amon-Ra St. BrownDET · WR | 13.0 | 13.5 | −0.5 | 72% | 22% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 22% |
| T.J. HockensonDET · TE | 8.2 | 13.5 | −5.3 | 82% | 22% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 22% |
| Darnell MooneyCHI · WR | 18.5 | 12.4 | +6.1 | 71% | 41% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 7 | 41% |
| Kalif RaymondDET · WR | 19.6 | 10.1 | +9.5 | 75% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 16% |
| Justin FieldsCHI · QB | 8.3 | 9.4 | −1.1 | 100% | 17 att | — | 17 | 3 | 8% | 0 | 0% |
| Jamaal WilliamsDET · RB | 6.6 | 9.0 | −2.4 | 30% | 56% car | — | 0 | 14 | 56% | 0 | 0% |
| Damien WilliamsCHI · RB | 15.0 | 8.5 | +6.5 | 33% | 21% car | — | 0 | 8 | 21% | 2 | 12% |
| Quintez CephusDET · WR | 12.3 | 8.4 | +3.9 | 87% | 14% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 14% |
| Allen RobinsonCHI · WR | 9.3 | 5.1 | +4.2 | 69% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 18% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 1.6 | 5.1 | −3.5 | 98% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 18% |
| Trinity BensonDET · WR | 3.2 | 5.1 | −1.9 | 28% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 8% |
| Marquise GoodwinCHI · WR | 0.1 | 4.0 | −3.9 | 50% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 2 | 12% |
| Khalil HerbertCHI · RB | 0.7 | 1.9 | −1.2 | 12% | 8% car | — | 0 | 3 | 8% | 0 | 0% |
| KhaDarel HodgeDET · WR | 2.3 | 1.7 | +0.6 | 11% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
Team totals: Lions 37 targets and 25 carries; Bears 17 targets and 39 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2021 season: 1.68 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.64 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Jared Goff
DET · QB · 16.8 pts on 18.6 expected
24 of 38 passing for 299 yards, 2 touchdowns; 3 carries for 8 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 18.6 expected.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 29.9, 17.4, 9.1, 16.8
W1W2W3W4
Justin Fields
CHI · QB · 8.3 pts on 9.4 expected
11 of 17 passing for 209 yards, 1 interception; 3 carries for 9 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 9.4 expected.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 6.7, 3.5, 3.9, 8.3
W1W2W3W4
Best fantasy game of the season.
D'Andre Swift Unlucky
DET · RB · 8.9 pts on 15.2 expected
6 targets (16% of the team's), 4 catches for 33 yards; 8 carries (32% of the team's) for 16 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 15.2 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 24.4, 11.8, 23.7, 8.9
W1W2W3W4
Lowest-scoring game of the season.
Amon-Ra St. Brown
DET · WR · 13.0 pts on 13.5 expected
8 targets (22% of the team's), 6 catches for 70 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 13.5 expected.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 4.3, 4.8, 1.2, 13.0
W1W2W3W4
Season high in targets (8). Best fantasy game of the season.
David Montgomery Ran hot
CHI · RB · 22.6 pts on 14.8 expected
23 carries (59% of the team's) for 106 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 14.8 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 18.8, 10.9, 7.5, 22.6
W1W2W3W4
Season high in carries (23). Best fantasy game of the season.
Darnell Mooney Ran hot
CHI · WR · 18.5 pts on 12.4 expected
7 targets (41% of the team's), 5 catches for 125 yards; 1 carry (3% of the team's) for 10 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 12.4 points; efficiency supplied the rest.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 7.6, 12.6, 1.9, 18.5
W1W2W3W4
Best fantasy game of the season.
T.J. Hockenson Unlucky
DET · TE · 8.2 pts on 13.5 expected
8 targets (22% of the team's), 4 catches for 42 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 13.5 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 25.7, 20.6, 3.0, 8.2
W1W2W3W4
Kalif Raymond Ran hot
DET · WR · 19.6 pts on 10.1 expected
6 targets (16% of the team's), 3 catches for 46 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 10.1 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 8.9, 3.8, 12.8, 19.6
W1W2W3W4
Best fantasy game of the season.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Detroit Lions
- ▲Stock up: Amon-Ra St. Brown played 72% of the snaps, up from a 56% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Quintez Cephus played 87% of the snaps, up from a 65% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Trinity Benson played 28% of the snaps, down from a 44% season average.
Chicago Bears
- ▲Stock up: Cole Kmet played 98% of the snaps, up from a 81% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Darnell Mooney played 71% of the snaps, down from a 96% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Allen Robinson played 69% of the snaps, down from a 87% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2021 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Lions D | Bears D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 18.2 | 17.7 |
| RBs | 26.6 | 21.5 |
| WRs | 34.4 | 34.4 |
| TEs | 14.1 | 8.7 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Chicago opened at 59% win probability and passed 98% in the third quarter on the way to the win.
Bears win probability
Key Swings
- +19Montgomery 4-yd TD run58% → 78%Q1 8:49
- +13Montgomery 9-yd TD run79% → 92%Q2 14:51
- +4Williams 4-yd TD run96% → 99%Q3 10:33
- −2Goff → Raymond, 4-yd TD>99% → 98%Q3 3:19
- −3Goff → Raymond, 25-yd TD>99% → 96%Q4 11:17
Swing in Bears win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Detroit Lions | Measure | Chicago Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 67 | Plays | 57 |
| 63% | Pass rate | 32% |
| 6.2 | Yds / dropback | 10.3 |
| 3.6 | Yds / carry | 4.8 |
| 4/11 | Third downs | 1/8 |
Efficiency edge Chicago ran 10 fewer plays but gained 4.1 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- DET Brown 22% · Hockenson 22% · Swift 16%
- CHI Mooney 41% · Robinson 18% · Kmet 18%
Possession Results
| Result | DET | CHI |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 2 | 3 |
| Field goals | 0 | 1 |
| Punts | 3 | 3 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 1 |
| Turnovers on downs | 2 | 0 |
CHI turnover edge: +1
- The Bears opened the scoring on their first possession, a 12-play, 75-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
- The Bears scored touchdowns on two of their first three drives.
All 19 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 12 | 75 | 6:11 | Touchdown |
| DET | Q1 8:49 | 11 | 63 | 6:05 | Fumble |
| CHI | Q1 2:44 | 6 | 89 | 2:53 | Touchdown |
| DET | Q2 14:51 | 10 | 70 | 5:16 | Downs |
| CHI | Q2 9:35 | 3 | 2 | 1:35 | Punt |
| DET | Q2 8:00 | 10 | 35 | 5:01 | Fumble |
| CHI | Q2 2:59 | 7 | 28 | 1:58 | Interception |
| DET | Q2 1:01 | 3 | 1 | 0:27 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 0:34 | 1 | 3 | 0:34 | End of half |
| DET | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 8 | 1:38 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 13:22 | 6 | 77 | 2:49 | Touchdown |
| DET | Q3 10:33 | 4 | 15 | 2:19 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 8:14 | 3 | 6 | 1:33 | Punt |
| DET | Q3 6:41 | 6 | 44 | 3:22 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q3 3:19 | 7 | 60 | 3:09 | Field goal |
| DET | Q3 0:10 | 8 | 75 | 3:53 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q4 11:17 | 5 | -3 | 3:46 | Punt |
| DET | Q4 7:31 | 12 | 58 | 3:16 | Downs |
| CHI | Q4 4:15 | 8 | 44 | 4:15 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Lions vs Bears Head-to-Head
The Lions and Bears first met in 1930 and have played 192 times since. They have been NFC North rivals since 1988.
- All-time series
- 105–82–5Bears lead, 192 meetings since 1930
- Postseason
- 0No playoff meetings
- Largest Lions win
- 42–01968
- Largest Bears win
- 49–01941
Since 2021
7–3 Lions lead
10 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- B
- B
- L
- L
- L
- B
- L
- L
- L
- L
Oldest to newest. L = Lions win, B = Bears win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 12 Bears at Lions Upcoming
- Week 17 Lions at Bears Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wk 18 Lions at Bears, 2025 Wk 18 recap DET 19 CHI 16 DET W
- 2025 Wk 2 Bears at Lions, 2025 Wk 2 recap DET 52 CHI 21 DET W
- 2024 Wk 16 Lions at Bears, 2024 Wk 16 recap DET 34 CHI 17 DET W
- 2024 Wk 13 Bears at Lions, 2024 Wk 13 recap DET 23 CHI 20 DET W
- 2023 Wk 14 Lions at Bears, 2023 Wk 14 recap CHI 28 DET 13 CHI W
- 2023 Wk 11 Bears at Lions, 2023 Wk 11 recap DET 31 CHI 26 DET W
- 2022 Wk 17 Bears at Lions, 2022 Wk 17 recap DET 41 CHI 10 DET W
- 2022 Wk 10 Lions at Bears, 2022 Wk 10 recap DET 31 CHI 30 DET W
- 2021 Wk 12 Bears at Lions, 2021 Wk 12 recap CHI 16 DET 14 CHI W
- 2021 Wk 4 Lions at Bears CHI 24 DET 14 CHI W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2021 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Lions | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 3-13-1 | Record | 6-11 |
| 19.1 | Points per game | 18.3 |
| 322.6 | Yards per game | 307.4 |
| 5.2 | Yards per play | 4.9 |
| 27.5 | Points allowed per game | 23.9 |
| 379.8 | Yards allowed per game | 316.7 |
Lions vs Bears Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- CHI −3Bears covered by 7
- Total
- 41.5Under: 38 points scored (by 3.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bears | 22.3 | 24 | +1.8 |
| Lions | 19.3 | 14 | −5.3 |
The Bears beat their implied total and the Lions fell short of theirs; the Fantasy tab has the player lines behind it.
Betting Trends
Each team's 2021 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Detroit Lions
- Against the spread
- 2–2
- Over/under
- 2–2
- ATS as underdog
- 2–2
- ATS on the road
- 0–2
Chicago Bears
- Against the spread
- 2–2
- Over/under
- 1–3
- ATS as favorite
- 2–0
- ATS as underdog
- 0–2
- ATS at home
- 2–0
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Lions vs Bears Fantasy Outlook for 2026
Two meetings are left on the 2026 schedule: Week 12 in Detroit and Week 17 in Chicago. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Lions or Bears player start in Week 12? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Lions and Bears players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Lions and Bears defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere these two matchups fall in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2021 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Lions vs Bears Game FAQ
Who won the 2021 Lions vs Bears Week 4 game?
The Chicago Bears beat the Detroit Lions 24–14 in Week 4 of the 2021 season. The game was played at Soldier Field in Chicago, IL, on October 3, 2021. See the Bears' 2021 schedule.
What was the final score of Lions vs Bears?
The final score was Bears 24, Lions 14. The Bears led 14–0 at halftime, and the second half went Lions 14, Bears 10.
What happened in the Lions vs Bears game?
Chicago led 14–0 at halftime and won 24–14, though Detroit took the second half 14–10. The Bears finished with a narrow 373–351 edge in total offense and averaged 6.5 yards per play. David Montgomery led all players with 23 carries for 106 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. The Lions committed 2 turnovers, the Bears 1.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Lions vs Bears?
David Montgomery led the game with 22.6 PPR fantasy points, the RB5 of Week 4, on 23 carries for 106 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. Kalif Raymond was next with 19.6 (WR11). See David Montgomery's 2021 game log.
Who led Lions vs Bears in passing, rushing and receiving?
Jared Goff (DET) led all passers with 24 of 38 for 299 yards and 2 touchdowns. David Montgomery (CHI) led in rushing with 23 carries for 106 yards and 2 touchdowns. Darnell Mooney (CHI) led in receiving with 5 catches for 125 yards.
How many fantasy points did David Montgomery score against the Lions?
David Montgomery scored 22.6 fantasy points against the Lions in Week 4 of the 2021 season, the same in PPR, half-PPR and standard scoring because he had no catches, on 23 carries for 106 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. He handled 59% of his team's carries.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Lions vs Bears?
Kalif Raymond outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 19.6 PPR points on 10.1 xFP (+9.5). D'Andre Swift fell furthest short, with 8.9 points on 15.2 xFP (−6.3). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Lions vs Bears?
Jared Goff had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 18.6 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 16.8. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Bears beat the Lions?
The Bears beat the Lions 24–14 because they averaged 6.5 yards per play to 5.2, won the turnover battle 2–1, and outgained them 373–351.
Which team won the turnover battle in Lions vs Bears?
The Bears won the turnover battle 2–1: the Lions gave the ball away 2 times and the Bears 1 time. The Bears won the game.
What is the all-time Lions vs Bears record?
The Bears lead the all-time series 105–82–5 across 192 meetings since 1930.
When did the Lions and Bears last play before this game?
Before Week 4 of 2021, they last met in the 2020 season on December 6, 2020, when the Lions beat the Bears 34–30.
What was the closing spread for Lions vs Bears?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Bears −3, making the Chicago Bears 3-point favorites, with a closing total of 41.5. That implied about 22.3 points for the Bears and 19.3 for the Lions.
Did Lions vs Bears go over or under the total?
The game went under. The consensus closing total was 41.5, and the teams combined for 38 points, 3.5 under the number.
Who covered the spread in Lions vs Bears?
The Bears covered by 7 against the closing line of Bears −3. The final margin was 10 points.
