Final2022 Week 17
Ford Field, Detroit, MI|
Chicago Bears vs Detroit Lions, Week 17 2022
Chicago Bears
Away
10
Detroit Lions
HomeWon
41
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bears | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Lions | 7 | 17 | 14 | 3 | 41 |
CHI 10 · DET 41 Final
Passing leader
DET · QB
22.4PPR pts
21/29, 255 YDS, 3 TD
Top fantasy scorer
DET · RB
27.7PPR pts
11 ATT, 78 YDS, 1 TD, 4 REC, 39 REC YDS, 1 REC TD
Bears leader
CHI · QB
17.2PPR pts
7/21, 75 YDS, 1 TD, 1 INT
Defensive playmaker
Aidan Hutchinson
DET
1 INT, 0.5 SACK, 4 TKL
Lions 41, Bears 10: Detroit beats Chicago
Detroit led 24–10 at halftime after a 17-point second quarter and outscored Chicago 17–0 after the break to win 41–10. The Lions finished with a 504–230 edge in total offense and averaged 7.2 yards per play.
The gap showed up everywhere. The Bears went 3-for-13 on third down and committed two turnovers, while the Lions kept the ball for 35:43 and finished without a giveaway.
The two teams meet again in Week 12 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +2.6 yards/play DET 7.2 · CHI 4.6
- +2 turnover margin DET 0 turnovers
- +274 total yards DET 504 · CHI 230
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Bear or Lion on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Lions Won
Detroit won the efficiency, turnover, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Bears | Stat | Lions |
|---|---|---|
| 4.6 | Yards per play | 7.2 |
| 2 | Turnovers | 0 |
| 230 | Total yards | 504 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 50 | Plays | 70 |
| 23% | Third-down conversion | 33% |
| 24:17 | Time of possession | 35:43 |
Scoring Summary
The Lions scored five touchdowns and two field goals; the Bears scored one touchdown and one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | CHI | DET |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 10:54 | CHI | Justin Fields → Cole Kmet, 13-yard TD Takes leadCairo Santos XP | 7 | 0 |
| 6:45 | DET | Jared Goff → Brock Wright, 2-yard TD Ties gameMichael Badgley XP | 7 | 7 |
| 2:26 | CHI | Cairo Santos 23-yard FG Takes lead | 10 | 7 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 14:24 | DET | D'Andre Swift 17-yard TD run Takes leadMichael Badgley XP | 10 | 14 |
| 4:16 | DET | Jared Goff → Brock Wright, 9-yard TD Extends leadMichael Badgley XP | 10 | 21 |
| 0:17 | DET | Michael Badgley 23-yard FG Extends lead | 10 | 24 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 11:38 | DET | Jamaal Williams 2-yard TD run Extends leadMichael Badgley XP | 10 | 31 |
| 6:36 | DET | Jared Goff → D'Andre Swift, 21-yard TD Extends leadMichael Badgley XP | 10 | 38 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 2:40 | DET | Michael Badgley 41-yard FG Extends lead | 10 | 41 |
Fantasy Points: Bears vs Lions, Week 17 2022
Fantasy leaders
- D'Andre SwiftDET · RB27.7 PTSRB3
- Jamaal WilliamsDET · RB22.7 PTSRB6
- Jared GoffDET · QB22.4 PTSQB7
- Justin FieldsCHI · QB17.2 PTSQB10
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.4 | QB7 | 21/29 | 255 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 133.5 | Start/Sit → | |
| 17.2 | QB10 | 7/21 | 75 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 132 | 0 | 40.8 | Start/Sit → | |
| -0.3 | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | -3 | 0 | — |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27.7 | RB3 | RB | 11 | 78 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 39 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 22.7 | RB6 | RB | 22 | 144 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | ||
| 16.3 | TE4 | TE | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 13 | 2 | Start/Sit → | |
| 10.7 | TE17 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 27 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 10.2 | WR29 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 62 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.6 | WR41 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 56 | 0 | ||
| 7.4 | WR42 | WR | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 40 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.6 | RB49 | RB | 6 | 24 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 12 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.0 | WR71 | WR | 1 | 40 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.0 | WR69 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 20 | 0 | ||
| 3.1 | RB61 | RB | 5 | 31 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.6 | TE45 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | ||
| 2.5 | TE47 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | ||
| 1.7 | TE51 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0 | ||
| 1.5 | WR97 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | ||
| 1.3 | WR102 | WR | 1 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fantasy Usage
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Cole KmetTE46 snaps88%
Byron PringleWR39 snaps75%
Equanimeous St. BrownWR32 snaps62%
David MontgomeryRB28 snaps54%
N'Keal HarryTE25 snaps48%
Target Share18 targets
- Byron Pringle22%, 4 targets
- Equanimeous St. Brown17%, 3 targets
- David Montgomery17%, 3 targets
- Cole Kmet17%, 3 targets
- Ryan Griffin6%, 1 targets
- Other22%, 4 targets
Carry Share22 carries
- Justin Fields45%, 10 carries
- David Montgomery27%, 6 carries
- Khalil Herbert23%, 5 carries
- Velus Jones5%, 1 carries
Detroit Lions
Snap Share
Amon-Ra St. BrownWR50 snaps70%
DJ CharkWR48 snaps68%
Brock WrightTE46 snaps65%
Jamaal WilliamsRB33 snaps46%
Josh ReynoldsWR31 snaps44%
Target Share28 targets
- Amon-Ra St. Brown18%, 5 targets
- DJ Chark14%, 4 targets
- D'Andre Swift14%, 4 targets
- Brock Wright14%, 4 targets
- Kalif Raymond11%, 3 targets
- Other29%, 8 targets
Carry Share39 carries
- Jamaal Williams56%, 22 carries
- D'Andre Swift28%, 11 carries
- Nate Sudfeld8%, 3 carries
- Jared Goff3%, 1 carries
- Kalif Raymond3%, 1 carries
- Other3%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46 | 88% | 3 | 17% | 0 | |
| 39 | 75% | 4 | 22% | 0 | |
| 50 | 70% | 5 | 18% | 0 | |
| 48 | 68% | 4 | 14% | 0 | |
| 46 | 65% | 4 | 14% | 0 | |
| 32 | 62% | 3 | 17% | 0 | |
| 28 | 54% | 3 | 17% | 6 | |
| 25 | 48% | 1 | 6% | 0 | |
| 33 | 46% | 1 | 4% | 22 | |
| 31 | 44% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 28 | 39% | 2 | 7% | 0 | |
| 20 | 38% | 0 | 0% | 5 | |
| 19 | 37% | 1 | 6% | 0 | |
| 25 | 35% | 4 | 14% | 11 | |
| 21 | 30% | 3 | 11% | 1 | |
| 20 | 28% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 14 | 27% | 1 | 6% | 0 | |
| 18 | 25% | 3 | 11% | 1 | |
| 13 | 18% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 9 | 17% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 8 | 15% | 1 | 6% | 0 | |
| 5 | 10% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 5 | 10% | 1 | 6% | 1 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+14.0D'Andre Swift27.7 PTS vs 13.7 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−6.7Byron Pringle0.0 PTS vs 6.7 xFP
- Highest expected volume15.8 xFPJamaal Williams22.7 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jamaal WilliamsDET · RB | 22.7 | 15.8 | +6.9 | 46% | 56% car | — | 0 | 22 | 56% | 1 | 3% |
| Justin FieldsCHI · QB | 17.2 | 15.3 | +1.9 | 100% | 21 att | — | 21 | 10 | 45% | 0 | 0% |
| D'Andre SwiftDET · RB | 27.7 | 13.7 | +14.0 | 35% | 28% car | — | 0 | 11 | 28% | 4 | 14% |
| Jared GoffDET · QB | 22.4 | 12.9 | +9.5 | 90% | 29 att | — | 29 | 1 | 3% | 0 | 0% |
| David MontgomeryCHI · RB | 5.6 | 8.9 | −3.3 | 54% | 27% car | — | 0 | 6 | 27% | 3 | 17% |
| Amon-Ra St. BrownDET · WR | 10.2 | 8.3 | +1.9 | 70% | 17% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 17% |
| Brock WrightDET · TE | 16.3 | 6.7 | +9.6 | 65% | 14% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 14% |
| Byron PringleCHI · WR | 0.0 | 6.7 | −6.7 | 75% | 22% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 22% |
| DJ CharkDET · WR | 7.6 | 6.7 | +0.9 | 68% | 14% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 14% |
| Jameson WilliamsDET · WR | 4.0 | 5.6 | −1.6 | 25% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 3 | 10% |
| Kalif RaymondDET · WR | 7.4 | 5.6 | +1.8 | 30% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 3 | 10% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 10.7 | 5.0 | +5.7 | 88% | 17% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 17% |
| Equanimeous St. BrownCHI · WR | 4.0 | 5.0 | −1.0 | 62% | 17% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 17% |
| Shane ZylstraDET · TE | 1.7 | 3.3 | −1.6 | 39% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Khalil HerbertCHI · RB | 3.1 | 3.2 | −0.1 | 38% | 23% car | — | 0 | 5 | 23% | 0 | 0% |
| Velus Jones Jr.CHI · WR | 1.3 | 2.3 | −1.0 | 10% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 5% | 1 | 6% |
| Nate SudfeldDET · QB | -0.3 | 1.9 | −2.2 | 10% | 0 att | — | 0 | 3 | 8% | 0 | 0% |
| Chase ClaypoolCHI · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 37% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 6% |
| Dante PettisCHI · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 27% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 6% |
| James MitchellDET · TE | 2.5 | 1.7 | +0.8 | 28% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Jason CabindaDET · RB | 1.5 | 1.7 | −0.2 | — | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Josh ReynoldsDET · WR | 1.5 | 1.7 | −0.2 | 44% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| N'Keal HarryCHI · TE | 2.6 | 1.7 | +0.9 | 48% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 6% |
| Ryan GriffinCHI · — | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 15% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 6% |
Team totals: Bears 18 targets and 22 carries; Lions 29 targets and 39 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2022 season: 1.67 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.64 per carry and 0.42 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Justin Fields
CHI · QB · 17.2 pts on 15.3 expected
7 of 21 passing for 75 yards, 1 touchdown, 1 interception; 10 carries for 132 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 15.3 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 40.4, 23.6, 21.3, 23.6, 9.9, 17.2
W10W11W13W15W16W17
Jared Goff Ran hot
DET · QB · 22.4 pts on 12.9 expected
21 of 29 passing for 255 yards, 3 touchdowns; 1 carry for 2 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 12.9 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 17.6, 21.6, 26.1, 14.1, 25.7, 22.4
W12W13W14W15W16W17
David Montgomery
CHI · RB · 5.6 pts on 8.9 expected
3 targets (17% of the team's), 2 catches for 12 yards; 6 carries (27% of the team's) for 24 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 8.9 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 21.1, 14.3, 16.7, 24.1, 10.4, 5.6
W11W12W13W15W16W17
Fewest points since Week 10.
Byron Pringle Unlucky
CHI · WR · 0.0 pts on 6.7 expected
4 targets (22% of the team's), 0 catches for 0 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 6.7 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 0.0, 9.2, 0.0, 11.9, 5.4, 0.0
W11W12W13W15W16W17
Jamaal Williams Ran hot
DET · RB · 22.7 pts on 15.8 expected
1 target (3% of the team's), 1 catch for 13 yards; 22 carries (56% of the team's) for 144 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 15.8 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 10.6, 9.5, 3.7, 3.3, 3.4, 22.7
W12W13W14W15W16W17
Best score since Week 11. A touchdown in 5 of the last 8 games.
D'Andre Swift Ran hot
DET · RB · 27.7 pts on 13.7 expected
4 targets (14% of the team's), 4 catches for 39 yards and 1 touchdown; 11 carries (28% of the team's) for 78 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 13.7 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 10.3, 21.1, 6.9, 12.5, 3.5, 27.7
W12W13W14W15W16W17
Best fantasy game of the season.
Brock Wright Ran hot
DET · TE · 16.3 pts on 6.7 expected
4 targets (14% of the team's), 3 catches for 13 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 6.7 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 2.6, 4.5, 0.0, 12.1, 2.1, 16.3
W12W13W14W15W16W17
Best fantasy game of the season.
Cole Kmet Ran hot
CHI · TE · 10.7 pts on 5.0 expected
3 targets (17% of the team's), 2 catches for 27 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 5.0 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 6.5, 5.7, 13.2, 6.5, 7.7, 10.7
W11W12W13W15W16W17
Stock Up, Stock Down
Chicago Bears
- ▲Stock up: Byron Pringle played 75% of the snaps, up from a 42% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Chase Claypool played 37% of the snaps, down from a 72% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Dante Pettis played 27% of the snaps, down from a 52% season average.
Detroit Lions
- ▲Stock up: Jamaal Williams led the backfield with 46% of the snaps after trailing D'Andre Swift before this game.
- ▲Stock up: Shane Zylstra played 39% of the snaps, up from a 21% season average.
- ▼Stock down: D'Andre Swift lost the backfield lead: 35% of the snaps to Jamaal Williams's 46%.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2022 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Bears D | Lions D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 18.5 | 22.3 |
| RBs | 27.3 | 19.3 |
| WRs | 32.7 | 37.7 |
| TEs | 9.0 | 13.5 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Detroit opened at 62% win probability and passed 98% in the third quarter on the way to the win.
Lions win probability
Key Swings
- −21Fields → Kmet, 13-yd TD61% → 40%Q1 10:54
- +22Goff → Wright, 2-yd TD39% → 61%Q1 6:45
- −10Santos 23-yd FG60% → 51%Q1 2:26
- +23Swift 17-yd TD run50% → 73%Q2 14:24
- +17Goff → Wright, 9-yd TD73% → 90%Q2 4:16
Swing in Lions win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Chicago Bears | Measure | Detroit Lions |
|---|---|---|
| 50 | Plays | 70 |
| 56% | Pass rate | 44% |
| 1.1 | Yds / dropback | 7.7 |
| 9.1 | Yds / carry | 6.8 |
| 3/13 | Third downs | 4/12 |
Efficiency edge Detroit ran 20 more plays and gained 6.6 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- CHI Pringle 22% · Kmet 17% · Montgomery 17%
- DET Brown 17% · Wright 14% · Swift 14%
Possession Results
| Result | CHI | DET |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 1 | 5 |
| Field goals | 1 | 2 |
| Punts | 7 | 3 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 0 |
| Turnovers on downs | 1 | 1 |
DET turnover edge: +2
- The Bears opened the scoring on their first possession, a 9-play, 75-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
- The Lions scored touchdowns on two of their first three drives.
All 24 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 9 | 75 | 4:06 | Touchdown |
| DET | Q1 10:54 | 9 | 75 | 4:09 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q1 6:45 | 7 | 70 | 4:19 | Field goal |
| DET | Q1 2:26 | 6 | 75 | 3:02 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 14:24 | 5 | 21 | 2:06 | Punt |
| DET | Q2 12:18 | 3 | 7 | 1:04 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 11:14 | 3 | -4 | 1:54 | Punt |
| DET | Q2 9:20 | 9 | 63 | 5:04 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 4:16 | 3 | 23 | 1:26 | Fumble |
| DET | Q2 2:50 | 8 | 46 | 2:33 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q2 0:17 | 1 | 0 | 0:17 | Interception |
| DET | Q3 15:00 | 6 | 75 | 3:22 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q3 11:38 | 3 | 4 | 1:06 | Punt |
| DET | Q3 10:32 | 7 | 92 | 3:56 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q3 6:36 | 3 | 5 | 1:35 | Punt |
| DET | Q3 5:01 | 3 | 8 | 1:33 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 3:28 | 3 | 5 | 2:01 | Punt |
| DET | Q3 1:27 | 9 | 20 | 4:40 | Punt |
| CHI | Q4 11:47 | 3 | 4 | 1:34 | Punt |
| DET | Q4 10:13 | 4 | 8 | 2:13 | Downs |
| CHI | Q4 8:00 | 8 | 31 | 2:49 | Downs |
| DET | Q4 5:11 | 5 | 47 | 2:31 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q4 2:40 | 3 | -9 | 1:04 | Punt |
| DET | Q4 1:36 | 3 | -3 | 1:36 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Bears vs Lions Head-to-Head
The Bears and Lions first met in 1930 and have played 192 times since. They have been NFC North rivals since 1988.
- All-time series
- 105–82–5Bears lead, 192 meetings since 1930
- Postseason
- 0No playoff meetings
- Largest Bears win
- 49–01941
- Largest Lions win
- 42–01968
Since 2021
7–3 Lions lead
10 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- B
- B
- L
- L
- L
- B
- L
- L
- L
- L
Oldest to newest. L = Lions win, B = Bears win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 12 Bears at Lions Upcoming
- Week 17 Lions at Bears Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wk 18 Lions at Bears, 2025 Wk 18 recap DET 19 CHI 16 DET W
- 2025 Wk 2 Bears at Lions, 2025 Wk 2 recap DET 52 CHI 21 DET W
- 2024 Wk 16 Lions at Bears, 2024 Wk 16 recap DET 34 CHI 17 DET W
- 2024 Wk 13 Bears at Lions, 2024 Wk 13 recap DET 23 CHI 20 DET W
- 2023 Wk 14 Lions at Bears, 2023 Wk 14 recap CHI 28 DET 13 CHI W
- 2023 Wk 11 Bears at Lions, 2023 Wk 11 recap DET 31 CHI 26 DET W
- 2022 Wk 17 Bears at Lions DET 41 CHI 10 DET W
- 2022 Wk 10 Lions at Bears, 2022 Wk 10 recap DET 31 CHI 30 DET W
- 2021 Wk 12 Bears at Lions, 2021 Wk 12 recap CHI 16 DET 14 CHI W
- 2021 Wk 4 Lions at Bears, 2021 Wk 4 recap CHI 24 DET 14 CHI W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2022 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Bears | Stat | Lions |
|---|---|---|
| 3-14 | Record | 9-8 |
| 19.2 | Points per game | 26.6 |
| 307.8 | Yards per game | 380.0 |
| 5.3 | Yards per play | 5.9 |
| 27.2 | Points allowed per game | 25.1 |
| 375.9 | Yards allowed per game | 392.4 |
Bears vs Lions Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- DET −4Lions covered by 27
- Total
- 52.5Under: 51 points scored (by 1.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lions | 28.3 | 41 | +12.8 |
| Bears | 24.3 | 10 | −14.3 |
The Lions beat their implied total and the Bears fell short of theirs; the Fantasy tab has the player lines behind it.
Betting Trends
Last 4 meetings: Lions 3–1 ATS, unders 3–1.
Each team's 2022 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Chicago Bears
- Against the spread
- 5–10–1
- Over/under
- 10–6
- ATS as favorite
- 0–1–1
- ATS as underdog
- 5–9
- ATS on the road
- 2–6
Detroit Lions
- Against the spread
- 11–5
- Over/under
- 10–6
- ATS as favorite
- 3–2
- ATS as underdog
- 8–3
- ATS at home
- 7–2
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Bears vs Lions Fantasy Outlook for 2026
Two meetings are left on the 2026 schedule: Week 12 in Detroit and Week 17 in Chicago. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Bears or Lions player start in Week 12? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Bears and Lions players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Bears and Lions defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere these two matchups fall in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2022 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Bears vs Lions Game FAQ
Who won the 2022 Bears vs Lions Week 17 game?
The Detroit Lions beat the Chicago Bears 41–10 in Week 17 of the 2022 season. The game was played at Ford Field in Detroit, MI, on January 1, 2023. See the Lions' 2022 schedule.
What was the final score of Bears vs Lions?
The final score was Lions 41, Bears 10. The Lions led 24–10 at halftime, and the second half went Bears 0, Lions 17.
What happened in the Bears vs Lions game?
Detroit led 24–10 at halftime after a 17-point second quarter and outscored Chicago 17–0 after the break to win 41–10. The Lions finished with a 504–230 edge in total offense and averaged 7.2 yards per play. D'Andre Swift led all players with 4 catches for 39 yards and a touchdown, plus 11 carries for 78 rushing yards and a touchdown. The Bears committed 2 turnovers, the Lions none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Bears vs Lions?
D'Andre Swift led the game with 27.7 PPR fantasy points, the RB3 of Week 17, on 4 catches for 39 yards and a touchdown, plus 11 carries for 78 rushing yards and a touchdown. Jamaal Williams was next with 22.7 (RB6). See D'Andre Swift's 2022 game log.
Who led Bears vs Lions in passing, rushing and receiving?
Jared Goff (DET) led all passers with 21 of 29 for 255 yards and 3 touchdowns. Jamaal Williams (DET) led in rushing with 22 carries for 144 yards and a touchdown. Amon-Ra St. Brown (DET) led in receiving with 4 catches for 62 yards.
How many fantasy points did D'Andre Swift score against the Bears?
D'Andre Swift scored 27.7 points in PPR leagues, 25.7 in half-PPR and 23.7 in standard scoring against the Bears in Week 17 of the 2022 season, on 4 catches for 39 yards and a touchdown, plus 11 carries for 78 rushing yards and a touchdown.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Bears vs Lions?
D'Andre Swift outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 27.7 PPR points on 13.7 xFP (+14.0). Byron Pringle fell furthest short, with 0.0 points on 6.7 xFP (−6.7). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Bears vs Lions?
Jamaal Williams had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 15.8 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 22.7. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Lions beat the Bears?
The Lions beat the Bears 41–10 because they averaged 7.2 yards per play to 4.6, won the turnover battle 2–0, and outgained them 504–230.
Which team won the turnover battle in Bears vs Lions?
The Lions won the turnover battle 2–0: the Bears gave the ball away 2 times and the Lions not at all. The Lions won the game.
What is the all-time Bears vs Lions record?
The Bears lead the all-time series 105–82–5 across 192 meetings since 1930.
When did the Bears and Lions last play before this game?
Before Week 17 of 2022, they last met in the 2022 season on November 13, 2022, when the Lions beat the Bears 31–30.
What was the closing spread for Bears vs Lions?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Lions −4, making the Detroit Lions 4-point favorites, with a closing total of 52.5. That implied about 28.3 points for the Lions and 24.3 for the Bears.
Did Bears vs Lions go over or under the total?
The game went under. The consensus closing total was 52.5, and the teams combined for 51 points, 1.5 under the number.
Who covered the spread in Bears vs Lions?
The Lions covered by 27 against the closing line of Lions −4. The final margin was 31 points.
