Final2025 Week 2
Ford Field, Detroit, MI|
Chicago Bears vs Detroit Lions, Week 2 2025
Chicago Bears
Away
21
Detroit Lions
HomeWon
52
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bears | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 21 |
| Lions | 14 | 14 | 10 | 14 | 52 |
CHI 21 · DET 52 Final
Passing leader
DET · QB
34.0PPR pts
23/28, 334 YDS, 5 TD
Top fantasy scorer
DET · WR
39.2PPR pts
9 REC, 115 YDS, 3 TD
Bears leader
CHI · WR
31.8PPR pts
7 REC, 128 YDS, 2 TD
Defensive playmaker
Kerby Joseph
DET
1 INT, 3 TKL
Lions 52, Bears 21: Detroit leads from start to finish
Detroit led 28–14 at halftime and outscored Chicago 24–7 after the break to win 52–21. The Lions finished with a 511–339 edge in total offense and averaged 8.8 yards per play.
The Bears went 7-for-13 on third down and committed two turnovers, while the Lions finished without a giveaway.
The two teams meet again in Week 12 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +3.5 yards/play DET 8.8 · CHI 5.3
- +2 turnover margin DET 0 turnovers
- +172 total yards DET 511 · CHI 339
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Bear or Lion on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Lions Won
Detroit won the efficiency, turnover, and time of possession battles.
| Bears | Stat | Lions |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 | Yards per play | 8.8 |
| 2 | Turnovers | 0 |
| 339 | Total yards | 511 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 64 | Plays | 58 |
| 54% | Third-down conversion | 40% |
| 29:40 | Time of possession | 30:20 |
Scoring Summary
The Lions scored seven touchdowns and one field goal; the Bears scored three touchdowns.
| Time | Team | Play | CHI | DET |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 12:13 | DET | Jahmyr Gibbs 6-yard TD run Takes leadJake Bates XP | 0 | 7 |
| 8:30 | CHI | Caleb Williams → Rome Odunze, 28-yard TD Ties gameCairo Santos XP | 7 | 7 |
| 2:39 | DET | David Montgomery 1-yard TD run Takes leadJake Bates XP | 7 | 14 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 4:48 | DET | Jared Goff → Brock Wright, 8-yard TD Extends leadJake Bates XP | 7 | 21 |
| 1:55 | CHI | Caleb Williams → Rome Odunze, 6-yard TDCairo Santos XP | 14 | 21 |
| 0:02 | DET | Jared Goff → Amon-Ra St. Brown, 4-yard TD Extends leadJake Bates XP | 14 | 28 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 10:39 | DET | Jake Bates 34-yard FG Extends lead | 14 | 31 |
| 6:22 | DET | Jared Goff → Jameson Williams, 44-yard TD Extends leadJake Bates XP | 14 | 38 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 14:56 | DET | Jared Goff → Amon-Ra St. Brown, 8-yard TD Extends leadJake Bates XP | 14 | 45 |
| 11:45 | CHI | D'Andre Swift 3-yard TD runCairo Santos XP | 21 | 45 |
| 7:58 | DET | Jared Goff → Amon-Ra St. Brown, 4-yard TD Extends leadJake Bates XP | 21 | 52 |
Fantasy Points: Bears vs Lions, Week 2 2025
Fantasy leaders
- Amon-Ra St. BrownDET · WR39.2 PTSWR1
- Jared GoffDET · QB34.0 PTSQB1
- Rome OdunzeCHI · WR31.8 PTSWR4
- Jahmyr GibbsDET · RB19.4 PTSRB8
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34.0 | QB1 | 23/28 | 334 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 156.0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 18.0 | QB20 | 19/30 | 207 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 27 | 0 | 91.9 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.8 | QB36 | 2/3 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 95.1 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39.2 | WR1 | WR | 2 | 7 | 0 | 11 | 9 | 115 | 3 | Start/Sit → | |
| 31.8 | WR4 | WR | — | — | — | 11 | 7 | 128 | 2 | Start/Sit → | |
| 19.4 | RB8 | RB | 12 | 94 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 18.8 | WR12 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 108 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 13.9 | RB22 | RB | 12 | 63 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 13.1 | RB24 | RB | 11 | 57 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 11.8 | TE8 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 28 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.6 | WR49 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 5 | 46 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.6 | TE30 | TE | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 26 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.9 | TE35 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 29 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.6 | RB47 | RB | 7 | 28 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.1 | WR86 | WR | 1 | 9 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 12 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.9 | WR89 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 29 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.3 | WR95 | WR | 1 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.5 | WR115 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | ||
| 0.4 | RB73 | RB | 3 | 4 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Rome OdunzeWR68 snaps100%
Cole KmetTE61 snaps90%
DJ MooreWR60 snaps88%
D'Andre SwiftRB39 snaps57%
Colston LovelandTE36 snaps53%
Target Share33 targets
- Rome Odunze33%, 11 targets
- DJ Moore18%, 6 targets
- Olamide Zaccheaus15%, 5 targets
- D'Andre Swift9%, 3 targets
- Kyle Monangai9%, 3 targets
- Other15%, 5 targets
Carry Share27 carries
- D'Andre Swift44%, 12 carries
- Kyle Monangai26%, 7 carries
- Caleb Williams19%, 5 carries
- Tyson Bagent7%, 2 carries
- Olamide Zaccheaus4%, 1 carries
Detroit Lions
Snap Share
Jameson WilliamsWR52 snaps88%
Amon-Ra St. BrownWR50 snaps85%
Sam LaPortaTE50 snaps85%
Jahmyr GibbsRB33 snaps56%
Kalif RaymondWR32 snaps54%
Target Share28 targets
- Amon-Ra St. Brown39%, 11 targets
- Jameson Williams14%, 4 targets
- Sam LaPorta14%, 4 targets
- Brock Wright11%, 3 targets
- Jahmyr Gibbs11%, 3 targets
- Other11%, 3 targets
Carry Share30 carries
- Jahmyr Gibbs40%, 12 carries
- David Montgomery37%, 11 carries
- Craig Reynolds10%, 3 carries
- Amon-Ra St. Brown7%, 2 carries
- Jared Goff3%, 1 carries
- Other3%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 68 | 100% | 11 | 33% | 0 | |
| 61 | 90% | 2 | 6% | 0 | |
| 60 | 88% | 6 | 18% | 0 | |
| 52 | 88% | 4 | 14% | 0 | |
| 50 | 85% | 11 | 39% | 2 | |
| 50 | 85% | 4 | 14% | 0 | |
| 39 | 57% | 3 | 9% | 12 | |
| 33 | 56% | 3 | 11% | 12 | |
| 32 | 54% | 1 | 4% | 1 | |
| 36 | 53% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 31 | 53% | 3 | 11% | 0 | |
| 30 | 44% | 5 | 15% | 1 | |
| 28 | 41% | 3 | 9% | 7 | |
| 23 | 39% | 1 | 4% | 11 | |
| 17 | 29% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 12 | 18% | 2 | 6% | 0 | |
| 6 | 9% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 3 | 5% | 0 | 0% | 3 | |
| 3 | 5% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+20.9Jared Goff34.0 PTS vs 13.1 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−5.1Olamide Zaccheaus4.1 PTS vs 9.2 xFP
- Highest expected volume20.0 xFPAmon-Ra St. Brown39.2 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amon-Ra St. BrownDET · WR | 39.2 | 20.0 | +19.2 | 85% | 39% tgt | — | 0 | 2 | 7% | 11 | 39% |
| Rome OdunzeCHI · WR | 31.8 | 18.8 | +13.0 | 100% | 33% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 11 | 33% |
| Caleb WilliamsCHI · QB | 18.0 | 16.5 | +1.5 | 84% | 30 att | — | 30 | 5 | 19% | 0 | 0% |
| Jared GoffDET · QB | 34.0 | 13.1 | +20.9 | 95% | 28 att | — | 28 | 1 | 3% | 0 | 0% |
| D'Andre SwiftCHI · RB | 13.9 | 12.9 | +1.0 | 57% | 44% car | — | 0 | 12 | 44% | 3 | 9% |
| Jahmyr GibbsDET · RB | 19.4 | 12.9 | +6.5 | 56% | 40% car | — | 0 | 12 | 40% | 3 | 11% |
| DJ MooreCHI · WR | 9.6 | 10.2 | −0.6 | 88% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 18% |
| Kyle MonangaiCHI · RB | 4.6 | 9.6 | −5.0 | 41% | 26% car | — | 0 | 7 | 26% | 3 | 9% |
| Olamide ZaccheausCHI · WR | 4.1 | 9.2 | −5.1 | 44% | 15% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 5 | 15% |
| David MontgomeryDET · RB | 13.1 | 8.8 | +4.3 | 39% | 37% car | — | 0 | 11 | 37% | 1 | 4% |
| Jameson WilliamsDET · WR | 18.8 | 6.8 | +12.0 | 88% | 14% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 14% |
| Sam LaPortaDET · TE | 5.6 | 6.8 | −1.2 | 85% | 14% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 14% |
| Brock WrightDET · TE | 11.8 | 5.1 | +6.7 | 53% | 11% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 11% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 4.9 | 3.4 | +1.5 | 90% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
| Luther Burden IIICHI · WR | 1.5 | 3.4 | −1.9 | 18% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
| Tyson BagentCHI · QB | 1.8 | 2.6 | −0.8 | 16% | 3 att | — | 3 | 2 | 7% | 0 | 0% |
| Kalif RaymondDET · WR | 3.3 | 2.4 | +0.9 | 54% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 1 | 4% |
| Craig ReynoldsDET · RB | 0.4 | 1.9 | −1.5 | 5% | 10% car | — | 0 | 3 | 10% | 0 | 0% |
| Colston LovelandCHI · TE | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 53% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Isaac TeSlaaDET · WR | 3.9 | 1.7 | +2.2 | 29% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
Team totals: Bears 33 targets and 27 carries; Lions 28 targets and 30 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2025 season: 1.70 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.65 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Caleb Williams
CHI · QB · 18.0 pts on 16.5 expected
19 of 30 passing for 207 yards, 2 touchdowns, 1 interception; 5 carries for 27 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 16.5 expected.
Start/Sit: Caleb Williams →Jared Goff Ran hot
DET · QB · 34.0 pts on 13.1 expected
23 of 28 passing for 334 yards, 5 touchdowns; 1 carry for 6 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 13.1 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Start/Sit: Jared Goff →Rome Odunze Ran hot
CHI · WR · 31.8 pts on 18.8 expected
11 targets (33% of the team's), 7 catches for 128 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 18.8 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Trend: Season high in targets (11).
D'Andre Swift
CHI · RB · 13.9 pts on 12.9 expected
3 targets (9% of the team's), 3 catches for 6 yards; 12 carries (44% of the team's) for 63 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 12.9 expected.
Start/Sit: D'Andre Swift →Amon-Ra St. Brown Ran hot
DET · WR · 39.2 pts on 20.0 expected
11 targets (39% of the team's), 9 catches for 115 yards and 3 touchdowns; 2 carries (7% of the team's) for 7 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 20.0 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Trend: Season high in targets (11).
Jahmyr Gibbs Ran hot
DET · RB · 19.4 pts on 12.9 expected
3 targets (11% of the team's), 3 catches for 10 yards; 12 carries (40% of the team's) for 94 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 12.9 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Trend: Season high in carries (12).
Kyle Monangai Unlucky
CHI · RB · 4.6 pts on 9.6 expected
3 targets (9% of the team's), 1 catch for 8 yards; 7 carries (26% of the team's) for 28 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 9.6 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Start/Sit: Kyle Monangai →Olamide Zaccheaus Unlucky
CHI · WR · 4.1 pts on 9.2 expected
5 targets (15% of the team's), 2 catches for 12 yards; 1 carry (4% of the team's) for 9 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 9.2 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Start/Sit: Olamide Zaccheaus →Stock Up, Stock Down
Chicago Bears
- ▲Stock up: Kyle Monangai played 41% of the snaps, up from a 13% season average.
- ▼Stock down: D'Andre Swift played 57% of the snaps, down from a 81% season average.
Detroit Lions
- ▲Stock up: Brock Wright played 53% of the snaps, up from a 36% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Isaac TeSlaa played 29% of the snaps, up from a 4% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2025 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Bears D | Lions D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 19.1 | 18.7 |
| RBs | 21.7 | 19.3 |
| WRs | 35.5 | 34.5 |
| TEs | 13.1 | 13.4 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Detroit opened at 50% win probability and passed 98% in the third quarter on the way to the win.
Lions win probability
Key Swings
- +20Gibbs 6-yd TD run50% → 70%Q1 12:13
- −21Williams → Odunze, 28-yd TD71% → 50%Q1 8:30
- +22Montgomery 1-yd TD run50% → 72%Q1 2:39
- +16Goff → Wright, 8-yd TD75% → 91%Q2 4:48
- −16Williams → Odunze, 6-yd TD92% → 76%Q2 1:55
Swing in Lions win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Chicago Bears | Measure | Detroit Lions |
|---|---|---|
| 64 | Plays | 58 |
| 58% | Pass rate | 48% |
| 5.5 | Yds / dropback | 11.9 |
| 5.0 | Yds / carry | 5.9 |
| 7/13 | Third downs | 4/10 |
Efficiency edge Detroit ran 6 fewer plays but gained 6.4 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- CHI Odunze 33% · Moore 18% · Zaccheaus 15%
- DET Brown 39% · Williams 14% · LaPorta 14%
Possession Results
| Result | CHI | DET |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 3 | 7 |
| Field goals | 0 | 1 |
| Punts | 4 | 3 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 0 |
| Turnovers on downs | 2 | 0 |
| Missed field goals | 0 | 1 |
DET turnover edge: +2
- The Lions opened the scoring on their first possession, a 5-play, 60-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
- The Lions scored touchdowns on two of their first three drives.
All 25 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET | Q1 15:00 | 5 | 60 | 2:47 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q1 12:13 | 8 | 74 | 3:43 | Touchdown |
| DET | Q1 8:30 | 4 | 20 | 1:38 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 6:52 | 3 | 8 | 1:49 | Punt |
| DET | Q1 5:03 | 4 | 50 | 2:24 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q1 2:39 | 6 | 32 | 2:08 | Fumble |
| DET | Q1 0:31 | 3 | 1 | 0:51 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 14:40 | 4 | 9 | 1:26 | Downs |
| DET | Q2 13:14 | 4 | 0 | 1:17 | Missed FG |
| CHI | Q2 11:57 | 4 | -8 | 2:12 | Interception |
| DET | Q2 9:45 | 8 | 67 | 4:57 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 4:48 | 7 | 57 | 2:53 | Touchdown |
| DET | Q2 1:55 | 8 | 76 | 1:53 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 0:02 | 0 | 0 | 0:02 | End of half |
| CHI | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 1 | 1:18 | Punt |
| DET | Q3 13:42 | 5 | 60 | 3:03 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q3 10:39 | 5 | 15 | 2:58 | Downs |
| DET | Q3 7:41 | 3 | 46 | 1:19 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q3 6:22 | 5 | -9 | 2:03 | Punt |
| DET | Q3 4:19 | 7 | 84 | 4:23 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q4 14:56 | 8 | 60 | 3:11 | Touchdown |
| DET | Q4 11:45 | 6 | 43 | 3:47 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q4 7:58 | 3 | 6 | 1:56 | Punt |
| DET | Q4 6:02 | 3 | 4 | 2:01 | Punt |
| CHI | Q4 4:01 | 8 | 58 | 4:01 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Bears vs Lions Head-to-Head
The Bears and Lions first met in 1930 and have played 192 times since. They have been NFC North rivals since 1988.
- All-time series
- 105–82–5Bears lead, 192 meetings since 1930
- Postseason
- 0No playoff meetings
- Largest Bears win
- 49–01941
- Largest Lions win
- 42–01968
Since 2021
7–3 Lions lead
10 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- B
- B
- L
- L
- L
- B
- L
- L
- L
- L
Oldest to newest. L = Lions win, B = Bears win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 12 Bears at Lions Upcoming
- Week 17 Lions at Bears Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wk 18 Lions at Bears, 2025 Wk 18 recap DET 19 CHI 16 DET W
- 2025 Wk 2 Bears at Lions DET 52 CHI 21 DET W
- 2024 Wk 16 Lions at Bears, 2024 Wk 16 recap DET 34 CHI 17 DET W
- 2024 Wk 13 Bears at Lions, 2024 Wk 13 recap DET 23 CHI 20 DET W
- 2023 Wk 14 Lions at Bears, 2023 Wk 14 recap CHI 28 DET 13 CHI W
- 2023 Wk 11 Bears at Lions, 2023 Wk 11 recap DET 31 CHI 26 DET W
- 2022 Wk 17 Bears at Lions, 2022 Wk 17 recap DET 41 CHI 10 DET W
- 2022 Wk 10 Lions at Bears, 2022 Wk 10 recap DET 31 CHI 30 DET W
- 2021 Wk 12 Bears at Lions, 2021 Wk 12 recap CHI 16 DET 14 CHI W
- 2021 Wk 4 Lions at Bears, 2021 Wk 4 recap CHI 24 DET 14 CHI W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2025 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Bears | Stat | Lions |
|---|---|---|
| 11-6 | Record | 9-8 |
| 25.9 | Points per game | 28.3 |
| 369.5 | Yards per game | 373.2 |
| 5.7 | Yards per play | 6.0 |
| 24.4 | Points allowed per game | 24.3 |
| 361.8 | Yards allowed per game | 331.9 |
Bears vs Lions Fantasy Outlook for 2026
Two meetings are left on the 2026 schedule: Week 12 in Detroit and Week 17 in Chicago. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Bears or Lions player start in Week 12? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Bears and Lions players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Bears and Lions defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere these two matchups fall in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2025 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Bears vs Lions Game FAQ
Who won the 2025 Bears vs Lions Week 2 game?
The Detroit Lions beat the Chicago Bears 52–21 in Week 2 of the 2025 season. The game was played at Ford Field in Detroit, MI, on September 14, 2025. See the Lions' 2025 schedule.
What was the final score of Bears vs Lions?
The final score was Lions 52, Bears 21. The Lions led 28–14 at halftime, and the second half went Bears 7, Lions 24.
What happened in the Bears vs Lions game?
Detroit led 28–14 at halftime and outscored Chicago 24–7 after the break to win 52–21. The Lions finished with a 511–339 edge in total offense and averaged 8.8 yards per play. Amon-Ra St. Brown led all players with 9 catches for 115 yards and 3 touchdowns, plus 2 carries for 7 rushing yards. The Bears committed 2 turnovers, the Lions none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Bears vs Lions?
Amon-Ra St. Brown led the game with 39.2 PPR fantasy points, the WR1 of Week 2, on 9 catches for 115 yards and 3 touchdowns, plus 2 carries for 7 rushing yards. Jared Goff was next with 34.0 (QB1). See Amon-Ra St. Brown's 2025 game log.
Who led Bears vs Lions in passing, rushing and receiving?
Jared Goff (DET) led all passers with 23 of 28 for 334 yards and 5 touchdowns. Jahmyr Gibbs (DET) led in rushing with 12 carries for 94 yards and a touchdown. Rome Odunze (CHI) led in receiving with 7 catches for 128 yards and 2 touchdowns.
How many fantasy points did Amon-Ra St. Brown score against the Bears?
Amon-Ra St. Brown scored 39.2 points in PPR leagues, 34.7 in half-PPR and 30.2 in standard scoring against the Bears in Week 2 of the 2025 season, on 9 catches for 115 yards and 3 touchdowns, plus 2 carries for 7 rushing yards. He drew 39% of his team's targets.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Bears vs Lions?
Jared Goff outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 34.0 PPR points on 13.1 xFP (+20.9). Olamide Zaccheaus fell furthest short, with 4.1 points on 9.2 xFP (−5.1). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Bears vs Lions?
Amon-Ra St. Brown had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 20.0 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 39.2. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Lions beat the Bears?
The Lions beat the Bears 52–21 because they averaged 8.8 yards per play to 5.3, won the turnover battle 2–0, and outgained them 511–339.
Which team won the turnover battle in Bears vs Lions?
The Lions won the turnover battle 2–0: the Bears gave the ball away 2 times and the Lions not at all. The Lions won the game.
What is the all-time Bears vs Lions record?
The Bears lead the all-time series 105–82–5 across 192 meetings since 1930.
When did the Bears and Lions last play before this game?
Before Week 2 of 2025, they last met in the 2024 season on December 22, 2024, when the Lions beat the Bears 34–17.
What is the Bears vs Lions record since 2021?
The Lions lead 7–3 across 10 meetings since the 2021 season, including this game.
