Chicago Bears vs New York Giants, Week 4 2022
Chicago Bears
Away
12
New York Giants
HomeWon
20
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bears | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 12 |
| Giants | 7 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 20 |
CHI 12NYG 20 Final
Passing leader
10.2PPR pts
11/22, 174 YDS
Top fantasy scorer
18.2PPR pts
31 ATT, 146 YDS, 2 REC, 16 REC YDS
Bears leader
13.4PPR pts
4 REC, 94 YDS
Defensive playmaker
Eddie Jackson
1 INT, 9 TKL
Giants 20, Bears 12: New York beats Chicago
New York led 14–9 at halftime and outscored Chicago 6–3 after the break to win 20–12. The Giants finished with a 333–304 edge in total offense and averaged 5.5 yards per play.
The gap showed up everywhere. The Bears went 5-for-15 on third down and committed three turnovers.
Key advantages
- +0.4 yards/play NYG 5.5 · CHI 5.1
- +1 turnover margin NYG 2 · CHI 3 turnovers
- +29 total yards NYG 333 · CHI 304
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Bear or Giant on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Giants Won
New York won the efficiency, turnover, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Bears | Stat | Giants |
|---|---|---|
| 5.1 | Yards per play | 5.5 |
| 3 | Turnovers | 2 |
| 304 | Total yards | 333 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 60 | Plays | 61 |
| 33% | Third-down conversion | 43% |
| 28:43 | Time of possession | 31:17 |
Scoring Summary
The Giants scored two touchdowns and two field goals; the Bears scored four field goals.
| Time | Team | Play | CHI | NYG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 8:27 | CHI | Michael Badgley 29-yard FG Takes lead | 3 | 0 |
| 5:06 | NYG | Daniel Jones 21-yard TD run Takes leadGraham Gano XP | 3 | 7 |
| 1:30 | CHI | Michael Badgley 22-yard FG | 6 | 7 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 5:17 | NYG | Daniel Jones 8-yard TD run Extends leadGraham Gano XP | 6 | 14 |
| 1:44 | CHI | Michael Badgley 40-yard FG | 9 | 14 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 11:02 | CHI | Michael Badgley 35-yard FG | 12 | 14 |
| 1:33 | NYG | Graham Gano 44-yard FG Extends lead | 12 | 17 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 5:31 | NYG | Graham Gano 43-yard FG Extends lead | 12 | 20 |
Fantasy Points: Bears vs Giants, Week 4 2022
Fantasy leaders
- Daniel Jones21.6 PTSQB8
- Saquon Barkley18.2 PTSRB13
- Darnell Mooney13.4 PTSWR24
- Khalil Herbert11.1 PTSRB26
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Fields | 10.2 | QB26 | 11/22 | 174 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 52 | 0 | 76.7 | Start/Sit → |
| Daniel Jones | 21.6 | QB8 | 8/13 | 71 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 68 | 2 | 76.1 | Start/Sit → |
| Tyrod Taylor | 2.4 | QB35 | 1/3 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 30 | 0 | 5.6 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saquon Barkley | 18.2 | RB13 | RB | 31 | 146 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Darnell Mooney | 13.4 | WR24 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 94 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Khalil Herbert | 11.1 | RB26 | RB | 19 | 77 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Daniel Bellinger | 5.3 | TE33 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 23 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Cole Kmet | 4.6 | TE36 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Trevon Wesco | 3.3 | TE45 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 23 | 0 | |
| Trestan Ebner | 2.8 | RB59 | RB | 6 | 20 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 0 | |
| Tanner Hudson | 2.8 | TE48 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 18 | 0 | |
| Darius Slayton | 2.1 | WR89 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 11 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Matt Breida | 1.8 | RB65 | RB | 3 | 18 | 0 | — | — | — | — | |
| David Sills | 1.5 | WR99 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | |
| Gary Brightwell | 1.0 | RB70 | RB | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | |
| Equanimeous St. Brown | 0.9 | WR104 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 0 | 9 | 0 | |
| Dante Pettis | 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Kenny Golladay | 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Ihmir Smith-Marsette | 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Richie James | -0.1 | — | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 9 | 0 |
Fantasy Usage
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Target Share20 targets
- Darnell Mooney25%, 5 targets
- Dante Pettis15%, 3 targets
- Cole Kmet15%, 3 targets
- Trestan Ebner15%, 3 targets
- Equanimeous St. Brown10%, 2 targets
- Other20%, 4 targets
Carry Share32 carries
- , 19 carries
- , 7 carries
- , 6 carries
New York Giants
Snap Share
Target Share15 targets
- Richie James20%, 3 targets
- Daniel Bellinger20%, 3 targets
- Saquon Barkley13%, 2 targets
- Tanner Hudson13%, 2 targets
- Darius Slayton13%, 2 targets
- Other20%, 3 targets
Carry Share44 carries
- , 31 carries
- , 6 carries
- , 3 carries
- , 3 carries
- , 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cole Kmet | 61 | 98% | 3 | 15% | 0 |
| Equanimeous St. Brown | 59 | 95% | 2 | 10% | 0 |
| Saquon Barkley | 61 | 94% | 2 | 13% | 31 |
| Darnell Mooney | 53 | 85% | 5 | 25% | 0 |
| Khalil Herbert | 48 | 77% | 1 | 5% | 19 |
| David Sills | 47 | 72% | 2 | 13% | 0 |
| Chris Myarick | 41 | 63% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
| Darius Slayton | 39 | 60% | 2 | 13% | 0 |
| Daniel Bellinger | 39 | 60% | 3 | 20% | 0 |
| Dante Pettis | 36 | 58% | 3 | 15% | 0 |
| Tanner Hudson | 37 | 57% | 2 | 13% | 0 |
| Kenny Golladay | 27 | 42% | 1 | 7% | 0 |
| Richie James | 21 | 32% | 3 | 20% | 0 |
| Trevon Wesco | 16 | 26% | 2 | 10% | 0 |
| Trestan Ebner | 14 | 23% | 3 | 15% | 6 |
| Matt Breida | 9 | 14% | 0 | 0% | 3 |
| Ihmir Smith-Marsette | 6 | 10% | 1 | 5% | 0 |
| Gary Brightwell | 3 | 5% | 0 | 0% | 1 |
| Jake Tonges | 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
| Marcus Johnson | 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+12.2Daniel Jones21.6 PTS vs 9.4 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−6.1Trestan Ebner2.8 PTS vs 8.9 xFP
- Highest expected volume23.3 xFPSaquon Barkley18.2 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saquon BarkleyNYG · RB | 18.2 | 23.3 | −5.1 | 94% | 70% car | — | 0 | 31 | 70% | 2 | 13% |
| Khalil HerbertCHI · RB | 11.1 | 13.9 | −2.8 | 77% | 59% car | — | 0 | 19 | 59% | 1 | 5% |
| Justin FieldsCHI · QB | 10.2 | 13.8 | −3.6 | 100% | 22 att | — | 22 | 7 | 22% | 0 | 0% |
| Daniel JonesNYG · QB | 21.6 | 9.4 | +12.2 | 82% | 13 att | — | 13 | 6 | 14% | 0 | 0% |
| Trestan EbnerCHI · RB | 2.8 | 8.9 | −6.1 | 23% | 19% car | — | 0 | 6 | 19% | 3 | 15% |
| Darnell MooneyCHI · WR | 13.4 | 8.3 | +5.1 | 85% | 25% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 25% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 4.6 | 5.0 | −0.4 | 98% | 15% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 15% |
| Daniel BellingerNYG · TE | 5.3 | 5.0 | +0.3 | 60% | 20% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 20% |
| Dante PettisCHI · WR | 0.0 | 5.0 | −5.0 | 58% | 15% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 15% |
| Richie JamesNYG · WR | -0.1 | 5.0 | −5.1 | 32% | 20% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 20% |
| Darius SlaytonNYG · WR | 2.1 | 3.3 | −1.2 | 60% | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 13% |
| David Sills VNYG · WR | 1.5 | 3.3 | −1.8 | 72% | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 13% |
| Equanimeous St. BrownCHI · WR | 0.9 | 3.3 | −2.4 | 95% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 10% |
| Tanner HudsonNYG · TE | 2.8 | 3.3 | −0.5 | 57% | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 13% |
| Trevon WescoCHI · TE | 3.3 | 3.3 | 0.0 | 26% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 10% |
| Tyrod TaylorNYG · QB | 2.4 | 3.2 | −0.8 | 18% | 3 att | — | 3 | 3 | 7% | 0 | 0% |
| Matt BreidaNYG · RB | 1.8 | 1.9 | −0.1 | 14% | 7% car | — | 0 | 3 | 7% | 0 | 0% |
| Ihmir Smith-MarsetteCHI · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 10% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 5% |
| Kenny GolladayNYG · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 42% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 7% |
| Gary BrightwellNYG · RB | 0.0 | 0.6 | −0.6 | 5% | 2% car | — | 0 | 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Bears 20 targets and 32 carries; Giants 15 targets and 44 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2022 season: 1.67 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.64 per carry and 0.42 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Justin Fields
11 of 22 passing for 174 yards; 7 carries for 52 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 13.8 expected.
Daniel Jones Ran hot
8 of 13 passing for 71 yards; 6 carries for 68 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 9.4 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Best fantasy game of the season.
Khalil Herbert
1 target (5% of the team's), 1 catch for 24 yards; 19 carries (59% of the team's) for 77 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 13.9 expected.
Trestan Ebner Unlucky
3 targets (15% of the team's), 2 catches for 8 yards; 6 carries (19% of the team's) for 20 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 8.9 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Saquon Barkley Volume, no payoff
2 targets (13% of the team's), 2 catches for 16 yards; 31 carries (70% of the team's) for 146 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 23.3 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Season high in carries (31).
Daniel Bellinger
3 targets (20% of the team's), 3 catches for 23 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 5.0 expected.
Darnell Mooney Ran hot
5 targets (25% of the team's), 4 catches for 94 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 8.3 points; efficiency supplied the rest.
Best fantasy game of the season.
Dante Pettis Unlucky
3 targets (15% of the team's), 0 catches for 0 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 5.0 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Chicago Bears
- Stock up: Khalil Herbert played 77% of the snaps, up from a 36% season average.
- Stock up: Equanimeous St. Brown played 95% of the snaps, up from a 77% season average.
New York Giants
- Stock up: Darius Slayton played 60% of the snaps, up from a 12% season average.
- Stock up: Tanner Hudson played 57% of the snaps, up from a 35% season average.
- Stock down: Richie James played 32% of the snaps, down from a 62% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2022 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Bears D | Giants D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 18.5 | 16.0 |
| RBs | 27.3 | 20.9 |
| WRs | 32.7 | 32.4 |
| TEs | 9.0 | 13.2 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
New York opened at 59% win probability and passed 98% in the fourth quarter on the way to the win.
Giants win probability
Key Swings
- −9Badgley 29-yd FG58% → 49%Q1 8:27
- +22Jones 21-yd TD run48% → 70%Q1 5:06
- +22Jones 8-yd TD run61% → 83%Q2 5:17
- −12Badgley 35-yd FG76% → 64%Q3 11:02
- +14Gano 44-yd FG65% → 79%Q3 1:33
Swing in Giants win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Chicago Bears | Measure | New York Giants |
|---|---|---|
| 60 | Plays | 61 |
| 47% | Pass rate | 28% |
| 5.5 | Yds / dropback | 4.2 |
| 4.7 | Yds / carry | 6.0 |
| 5/15 | Third downs | 6/14 |
Efficiency edge New York ran 1 more plays and gained 1.3 more yards per carry.
- Top targets
- CHI Mooney 25% · Kmet 15% · Pettis 15%
- NYG Bellinger 20% · James 20% · Slayton 13%
Possession Results
| Result | CHI | NYG |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 0 | 2 |
| Field goals | 4 | 2 |
| Punts | 5 | 5 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 1 |
| Missed field goals | 0 | 1 |
NYG turnover edge: +1
- The Bears opened the scoring on their first possession, a 10-play, 65-yard drive that ended in a field goal.
- The Giants drained the clock with two second-half drives of four to seven minutes.
All 23 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYG | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 1 | 1:16 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 13:44 | 10 | 65 | 5:17 | Field goal |
| NYG | Q1 8:27 | 6 | 75 | 3:21 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q1 5:06 | 6 | 77 | 3:36 | Field goal |
| NYG | Q1 1:30 | 6 | 23 | 2:31 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 13:59 | 10 | 53 | 4:27 | Fumble |
| NYG | Q2 9:32 | 7 | 75 | 4:15 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 5:17 | 3 | -5 | 1:29 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 3:48 | 7 | 13 | 2:04 | Field goal |
| NYG | Q2 1:44 | 6 | 25 | 1:08 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 0:36 | 3 | 9 | 0:36 | End of half |
| CHI | Q3 15:00 | 9 | 58 | 3:58 | Field goal |
| NYG | Q3 11:02 | 6 | 12 | 4:30 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 6:32 | 3 | -1 | 2:09 | Punt |
| NYG | Q3 4:23 | 5 | 60 | 2:50 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q3 1:33 | 3 | 6 | 0:55 | Punt |
| NYG | Q3 0:38 | 4 | 21 | 2:05 | Interception |
| CHI | Q4 13:33 | 3 | 7 | 1:28 | Punt |
| NYG | Q4 12:05 | 13 | 54 | 6:34 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q4 5:31 | 4 | 20 | 2:27 | Punt |
| NYG | Q4 3:04 | 3 | 4 | 1:03 | Punt |
| NYG | Q4 2:01 | 5 | 18 | 1:44 | Missed FG |
| CHI | Q4 0:17 | 3 | 5 | 0:17 | Fumble |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Bears vs Giants Head-to-Head
The Bears and Giants first met in 1925 and have played 64 times since.
- All-time series
- 37–25–2Bears lead, 64 meetings since 1925
- Postseason
- 5–3Split 5–3
- Largest Bears win
- 56–71943
- Largest Giants win
- 47–71956
Since 2021
2–1 Bears lead
3 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
Oldest to newest. B = Bears win, G = Giants win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wk 10 Giants at Bears, 2025 Wk 10 recap CHI 24 NYG 20 CHI W
- 2022 Wk 4 Bears at Giants NYG 20 CHI 12 NYG W
- 2021 Wk 17 Giants at Bears, 2021 Wk 17 recap CHI 29 NYG 3 CHI W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2022 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Bears | Stat | Giants |
|---|---|---|
| 3-14 | Record | 9-7-1 |
| 19.2 | Points per game | 21.5 |
| 307.8 | Yards per game | 333.9 |
| 5.3 | Yards per play | 5.2 |
| 27.2 | Points allowed per game | 21.8 |
| 375.9 | Yards allowed per game | 358.2 |
Bears vs Giants Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- NYG −3Giants covered by 5
- Total
- 39.5Under: 32 points scored (by 7.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Giants | 21.3 | 20 | −1.3 |
| Bears | 18.3 | 12 | −6.3 |
Both offenses finished under the market's expectation, which matches the low fantasy output in the Fantasy tab.
Betting Trends
Last 2 meetings: Bears 1–1 ATS, unders 2–0.
Each team's 2022 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Chicago Bears
- Against the spread
- 1–2–1
- Over/under
- 1–3
- ATS as favorite
- 0–0–1
- ATS as underdog
- 1–2
- ATS on the road
- 0–2
New York Giants
- Against the spread
- 3–1
- Over/under
- 1–3
- ATS as favorite
- 1–1
- ATS as underdog
- 2–0
- ATS at home
- 2–1
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Bears and Giants in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Bear or a Giant, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Bears or Giants player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Bears and Giants players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Bears and Giants defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2022 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Bears vs Giants Game FAQ
Who won the 2022 Bears vs Giants Week 4 game?
The New York Giants beat the Chicago Bears 20–12 in Week 4 of the 2022 season. The game was played at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, NJ, on October 2, 2022. See the Giants' 2022 schedule.
What was the final score of Bears vs Giants?
The final score was Giants 20, Bears 12. The Giants led 14–9 at halftime, and the second half went Bears 3, Giants 6.
What happened in the Bears vs Giants game?
New York led 14–9 at halftime and outscored Chicago 6–3 after the break to win 20–12. The Giants finished with a 333–304 edge in total offense and averaged 5.5 yards per play. Daniel Jones led all players with 8 of 13 passing for 71 yards, plus 6 carries for 68 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. The Bears committed 3 turnovers, the Giants 2.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Bears vs Giants?
Daniel Jones led the game with 21.6 PPR fantasy points, the QB8 of Week 4, on 8 of 13 passing for 71 yards, plus 6 carries for 68 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. Saquon Barkley was next with 18.2 (RB13). See Daniel Jones's 2022 game log.
Who led Bears vs Giants in passing, rushing and receiving?
Justin Fields (CHI) led all passers with 11 of 22 for 174 yards. Saquon Barkley (NYG) led in rushing with 31 carries for 146 yards. Darnell Mooney (CHI) led in receiving with 4 catches for 94 yards.
How many fantasy points did Daniel Jones score against the Bears?
Daniel Jones scored 21.6 fantasy points against the Bears in Week 4 of the 2022 season, the same in PPR, half-PPR and standard scoring because he had no catches, on 8 of 13 passing for 71 yards, plus 6 carries for 68 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Bears vs Giants?
Daniel Jones outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 21.6 PPR points on 9.4 xFP (+12.2). Trestan Ebner fell furthest short, with 2.8 points on 8.9 xFP (−6.1). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
How did the Giants beat the Bears?
The Giants beat the Bears 20–12 because they averaged 5.5 yards per play to 5.1, won the turnover battle 3–2, and outgained them 333–304.
Which team won the turnover battle in Bears vs Giants?
The Giants won the turnover battle 3–2: the Bears gave the ball away 3 times and the Giants 2 times. The Giants won the game.
What is the all-time Bears vs Giants record?
The Bears lead the all-time series 37–25–2 across 64 meetings since 1925, including a 5–3 record in the postseason.
When did the Bears and Giants last play before this game?
Before Week 4 of 2022, they last met in the 2021 season on January 2, 2022, when the Bears beat the Giants 29–3.
Have the Bears and Giants met in the playoffs?
Yes, 8 times, most recently in the 1990 playoffs. The Bears are 5–3 against the Giants in the postseason.
What was the closing spread for Bears vs Giants?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Giants −3, making the New York Giants 3-point favorites, with a closing total of 39.5. That implied about 21.3 points for the Giants and 18.3 for the Bears.
Did Bears vs Giants go over or under the total?
The game went under. The consensus closing total was 39.5, and the teams combined for 32 points, 7.5 under the number.
Who covered the spread in Bears vs Giants?
The Giants covered by 5 against the closing line of Giants −3. The final margin was 8 points.