Final2022 Week 5
U.S. Bank Stadium, Minneapolis, MN|
Chicago Bears vs Minnesota Vikings, Week 5 2022
Chicago Bears
Away
22
Minnesota Vikings
HomeWon
29
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bears | 3 | 7 | 9 | 3 | 22 |
| Vikings | 7 | 14 | 0 | 8 | 29 |
CHI 22 · MIN 29 Final
Passing leader
MIN · QB
23.2PPR pts
32/41, 296 YDS, 1 TD, 1 INT, 1 RUSH TD
Top fantasy scorer
MIN · WR
30.3PPR pts
12 REC, 154 YDS
Bears leader
CHI · RB
18.2PPR pts
12 ATT, 20 YDS, 1 TD, 4 REC, 62 REC YDS
Defensive playmaker
Kindle Vildor
CHI
1 INT, 6 TKL
Vikings 29, Bears 22: Minnesota beats Chicago
Minnesota led 21–10 at halftime after a 14-point second quarter and won 29–22, though Chicago took the second half 12–8. The Vikings finished with a 429–271 edge in total offense.
The Bears went 4-for-10 on third down and committed one turnover, while the Vikings kept the ball for 36:44.
The two teams meet again in Week 18 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +158 total yards MIN 429 · CHI 271
- +40% third-down rate MIN 80% · CHI 40%
- +13:28 time of possession MIN 36:44 · CHI 23:16
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Bear or Viking on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Vikings Won
Minnesota won the third-down and time of possession battles.
| Bears | Stat | Vikings |
|---|---|---|
| 271 | Total yards | 429 |
| 40% | Third-down conversion | 80% |
| 23:16 | Time of possession | 36:44 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 5.8 | Yards per play | 5.8 |
| 47 | Plays | 74 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 1 |
Scoring Summary
The Vikings scored four touchdowns; the Bears scored two touchdowns and three field goals.
| Time | Team | Play | CHI | MIN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 8:15 | MIN | Dalvin Cook 1-yard TD run Takes leadGreg Joseph XP | 0 | 7 |
| 6:06 | CHI | Cairo Santos 50-yard FG | 3 | 7 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 14:55 | MIN | Dalvin Cook 5-yard TD run Extends leadGreg Joseph XP | 3 | 14 |
| 7:20 | MIN | Kirk Cousins → Jalen Reagor, 1-yard TD Extends leadGreg Joseph XP | 3 | 21 |
| 1:08 | CHI | David Montgomery 9-yard TD runCairo Santos XP | 10 | 21 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 10:24 | CHI | Justin Fields → Velus Jones Jr., 9-yard TD2-pt try failed | 16 | 21 |
| 1:05 | CHI | Cairo Santos 43-yard FG | 19 | 21 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 9:26 | CHI | Cairo Santos 51-yard FG Takes lead | 22 | 21 |
| 2:26 | MIN | Kirk Cousins 1-yard TD run Game winnerKirk Cousins → Justin Jefferson, 2-pt conversion | 22 | 29 |
Fantasy Points: Bears vs Vikings, Week 5 2022
Fantasy leaders
- Justin JeffersonMIN · WR30.3 PTSWR2
- Dalvin CookMIN · RB26.1 PTSRB6
- Kirk CousinsMIN · QB23.2 PTSQB5
- David MontgomeryCHI · RB18.2 PTSRB16
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.2 | QB5 | 32/41 | 296 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 94.7 | Start/Sit → | |
| 17.0 | QB13 | 15/21 | 208 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 47 | 0 | 118.8 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30.3 | WR2 | WR | — | — | — | 13 | 12 | 154 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 26.1 | RB6 | RB | 18 | 94 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 27 | 0 | ||
| 18.2 | RB16 | RB | 12 | 20 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 62 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.1 | WR46 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 5 | 41 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.5 | TE16 | TE | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 45 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.2 | TE17 | TE | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 42 | 0 | ||
| 7.9 | WR54 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 9 | 1 | ||
| 7.2 | WR58 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 2 | 52 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.1 | WR59 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 7.0 | RB43 | RB | 9 | 19 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 21 | 0 | ||
| 6.7 | WR61 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 4 | 27 | 0 | ||
| 4.4 | WR79 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 24 | 0 | ||
| 2.6 | TE36 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.1 | RB70 | RB | 4 | 11 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.1 | TE50 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 0.5 | WR113 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 15 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fantasy Usage
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Darnell MooneyWR47 snaps94%
Cole KmetTE45 snaps90%
David MontgomeryRB36 snaps72%
Equanimeous St. BrownWR31 snaps62%
Dante PettisWR30 snaps60%
Target Share21 targets
- Darnell Mooney24%, 5 targets
- David Montgomery19%, 4 targets
- Cole Kmet19%, 4 targets
- Dante Pettis10%, 2 targets
- Equanimeous St. Brown10%, 2 targets
- Other19%, 4 targets
Carry Share24 carries
- David Montgomery50%, 12 carries
- Justin Fields33%, 8 carries
- Khalil Herbert17%, 4 carries
Minnesota Vikings
Snap Share
Justin JeffersonWR79 snaps100%
Adam ThielenWR76 snaps96%
K.J. OsbornWR65 snaps82%
Irv SmithTE50 snaps63%
Dalvin CookRB45 snaps57%
Target Share39 targets
- Justin Jefferson33%, 13 targets
- Adam Thielen18%, 7 targets
- Irv Smith13%, 5 targets
- K.J. Osborn13%, 5 targets
- Alexander Mattison10%, 4 targets
- Other13%, 5 targets
Carry Share31 carries
- Dalvin Cook58%, 18 carries
- Alexander Mattison29%, 9 carries
- Kirk Cousins13%, 4 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79 | 100% | 13 | 33% | 0 | |
| 76 | 96% | 7 | 18% | 0 | |
| 47 | 94% | 5 | 24% | 0 | |
| 45 | 90% | 4 | 19% | 0 | |
| 65 | 82% | 5 | 13% | 0 | |
| 36 | 72% | 4 | 19% | 12 | |
| 50 | 63% | 5 | 13% | 0 | |
| 31 | 62% | 2 | 10% | 0 | |
| 30 | 60% | 2 | 10% | 0 | |
| 45 | 57% | 2 | 5% | 18 | |
| 35 | 44% | 2 | 5% | 0 | |
| 34 | 43% | 4 | 10% | 9 | |
| 19 | 38% | 2 | 10% | 0 | |
| 14 | 28% | 0 | 0% | 4 | |
| 3 | 6% | 1 | 5% | 0 | |
| 2 | 4% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 3 | 4% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+11.2Dalvin Cook26.1 PTS vs 14.9 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−5.5Alexander Mattison7.0 PTS vs 12.5 xFP
- Highest expected volume22.1 xFPJustin Jefferson30.3 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin JeffersonMIN · WR | 30.3 | 22.1 | +8.2 | 100% | 33% tgt | — | 1 | 0 | 0% | 13 | 33% |
| Kirk CousinsMIN · QB | 23.2 | 19.9 | +3.3 | 100% | 41 att | — | 41 | 4 | 13% | 0 | 0% |
| Dalvin CookMIN · RB | 26.1 | 14.9 | +11.2 | 57% | 58% car | — | 0 | 18 | 58% | 2 | 5% |
| David MontgomeryCHI · RB | 18.2 | 14.4 | +3.8 | 72% | 50% car | — | 0 | 12 | 50% | 4 | 19% |
| Justin FieldsCHI · QB | 17.0 | 14.0 | +3.0 | 100% | 21 att | — | 21 | 8 | 33% | 0 | 0% |
| Alexander MattisonMIN · RB | 7.0 | 12.5 | −5.5 | 43% | 29% car | — | 0 | 9 | 29% | 4 | 10% |
| Adam ThielenMIN · WR | 6.7 | 11.7 | −5.0 | 96% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 18% |
| Darnell MooneyCHI · WR | 7.2 | 8.3 | −1.1 | 94% | 24% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 24% |
| Irv Smith Jr.MIN · TE | 8.2 | 8.3 | −0.1 | 63% | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 13% |
| K.J. OsbornMIN · WR | 9.1 | 8.3 | +0.8 | 82% | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 13% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 8.5 | 6.7 | +1.8 | 90% | 19% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 19% |
| Dante PettisCHI · WR | 0.0 | 3.3 | −3.3 | 60% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 10% |
| Equanimeous St. BrownCHI · WR | 4.4 | 3.3 | +1.1 | 62% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 10% |
| Ihmir Smith-MarsetteCHI · WR | 0.5 | 3.3 | −2.8 | 38% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 10% |
| Johnny MundtMIN · TE | 2.6 | 3.3 | −0.7 | 44% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 5% |
| Khalil HerbertCHI · RB | 1.1 | 2.6 | −1.5 | 28% | 17% car | — | 0 | 4 | 17% | 0 | 0% |
| Jalen ReagorMIN · WR | 7.1 | 1.7 | +5.4 | 4% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Ryan GriffinCHI · — | 1.1 | 1.7 | −0.6 | — | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 5% |
| Velus Jones Jr.CHI · WR | 7.9 | 1.7 | +6.2 | 6% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 5% |
Team totals: Bears 21 targets and 24 carries; Vikings 39 targets and 31 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2022 season: 1.67 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.64 per carry and 0.42 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Justin Fields
CHI · QB · 17.0 pts on 14.0 expected
15 of 21 passing for 208 yards, 1 touchdown; 8 carries for 47 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 14.0 expected.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 14.6, 8.8, 4.9, 10.2, 17.0
W1W2W3W4W5
No interceptions after 4 in the previous four games. Best fantasy game of the season.
Kirk Cousins
MIN · QB · 23.2 pts on 19.9 expected
32 of 41 passing for 296 yards, 1 touchdown, 1 interception; 4 carries for 4 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 19.9 expected.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 19.1, 10.8, 18.3, 13.9, 23.2
W1W2W3W4W5
Best fantasy game of the season.
David Montgomery
CHI · RB · 18.2 pts on 14.4 expected
4 targets (19% of the team's), 4 catches for 62 yards; 12 carries (50% of the team's) for 20 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 14.4 expected.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 8.0, 15.6, 1.1, 18.2
W1W2W3W5
Best fantasy game of the season.
Darnell Mooney
CHI · WR · 7.2 pts on 8.3 expected
5 targets (24% of the team's), 2 catches for 52 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 8.3 expected.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 1.8, 0.6, 4.3, 13.4, 7.2
W1W2W3W4W5
Justin Jefferson Ran hot
MIN · WR · 30.3 pts on 22.1 expected
1 of 1 passing for 23 yards; 13 targets (33% of the team's), 12 catches for 154 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 22.1 points; efficiency supplied the rest.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 39.4, 10.8, 4.4, 31.0, 30.3
W1W2W3W4W5
Dalvin Cook Ran hot
MIN · RB · 26.1 pts on 14.9 expected
2 targets (5% of the team's), 2 catches for 27 yards; 18 carries (58% of the team's) for 94 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 14.9 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 13.8, 7.6, 12.6, 10.6, 26.1
W1W2W3W4W5
Best fantasy game of the season.
Alexander Mattison Unlucky
MIN · RB · 7.0 pts on 12.5 expected
4 targets (10% of the team's), 3 catches for 21 yards; 9 carries (29% of the team's) for 19 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 12.5 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 3.6, 4.4, 11.4, 8.8, 7.0
W1W2W3W4W5
Jalen Reagor Ran hot
MIN · WR · 7.1 pts on 1.7 expected
1 target (3% of the team's), 1 catch for 1 yard and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 1.7 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 3.4, 0.2, 0.0, 7.1
W2W3W4W5
Best fantasy game of the season.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Chicago Bears
- ▲Stock up: David Montgomery played 72% of the snaps, up from a 54% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Ihmir Smith-Marsette played 38% of the snaps, up from a 8% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Equanimeous St. Brown played 62% of the snaps, down from a 82% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2022 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Bears D | Vikings D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 18.5 | 18.8 |
| RBs | 27.3 | 22.1 |
| WRs | 32.7 | 39.2 |
| TEs | 9.0 | 11.7 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Minnesota opened at 74% win probability and passed 98% before halftime on the way to the win.
Vikings win probability
Key Swings
- +15Cook 1-yd TD run72% → 87%Q1 8:15
- +12Cook 5-yd TD run81% → 93%Q2 14:55
- −12Fields → Jones, 9-yd TD95% → 84%Q3 10:24
- −21Santos 51-yd FG73% → 53%Q4 9:26
- +59Cousins 1-yd TD run40% → >99%Q4 2:26
Swing in Vikings win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Chicago Bears | Measure | Minnesota Vikings |
|---|---|---|
| 47 | Plays | 74 |
| 49% | Pass rate | 58% |
| 8.4 | Yds / dropback | 7.3 |
| 3.3 | Yds / carry | 3.8 |
| 4/10 | Third downs | 12/15 |
Efficiency edge Minnesota ran 27 more plays and gained 0.5 more yards per carry.
- Top targets
- CHI Mooney 24% · Kmet 19% · Montgomery 19%
- MIN Jefferson 33% · Thielen 18% · Smith 13%
Possession Results
| Result | CHI | MIN |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 2 | 4 |
| Field goals | 3 | 0 |
| Punts | 2 | 1 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 1 |
| Missed field goals | 0 | 2 |
- The Vikings opened the scoring on their first possession, a 12-play, 86-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
- The Vikings scored touchdowns on three of their first three drives.
All 17 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIN | Q1 15:00 | 12 | 86 | 6:45 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q1 8:15 | 6 | 44 | 2:09 | Field goal |
| MIN | Q1 6:06 | 11 | 75 | 6:11 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 14:55 | 3 | -5 | 1:18 | Punt |
| MIN | Q2 13:37 | 9 | 71 | 6:17 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 7:20 | 6 | 15 | 3:15 | Punt |
| MIN | Q2 4:05 | 5 | 25 | 2:11 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 1:54 | 4 | 50 | 0:46 | Touchdown |
| MIN | Q2 1:08 | 8 | 40 | 1:08 | Missed FG |
| CHI | Q3 15:00 | 8 | 67 | 4:36 | Touchdown |
| MIN | Q3 10:24 | 7 | 15 | 2:50 | Missed FG |
| CHI | Q3 7:34 | 11 | 34 | 6:29 | Field goal |
| MIN | Q3 1:05 | 5 | 24 | 3:21 | Interception |
| CHI | Q4 12:44 | 7 | 19 | 3:18 | Field goal |
| MIN | Q4 9:26 | 17 | 75 | 7:00 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q4 2:26 | 5 | 36 | 1:25 | Fumble |
| MIN | Q4 1:01 | 2 | -2 | 1:01 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Bears vs Vikings Head-to-Head
The Bears and Vikings first met in 1961 and have played 131 times since. They have been NFC North rivals since 1970.
- All-time series
- 70–59–2Vikings lead, 131 meetings since 1961
- Postseason
- 1–0Bears won in 1994
- Largest Bears win
- 38–71989
- Largest Vikings win
- 31–01969
Since 2021
9–2 Vikings lead
11 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- V
- V
- V
- V
- V
- B
- V
- V
- V
- B
- V
Oldest to newest. V = Vikings win, B = Bears win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 18 Bears at Vikings Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2026 Wk 2 Vikings at Bears, 2026 Wk 2 recap MIN 9 CHI 3 MIN W
- 2025 Wk 11 Bears at Vikings, 2025 Wk 11 recap CHI 19 MIN 17 CHI W
- 2025 Wk 1 Vikings at Bears, 2025 Wk 1 recap MIN 27 CHI 24 MIN W
- 2024 Wk 15 Bears at Vikings, 2024 Wk 15 recap MIN 30 CHI 12 MIN W
- 2024 Wk 12 Vikings at Bears, 2024 Wk 12 recap MIN 30 CHI 27 MIN W
- 2023 Wk 12 Bears at Vikings, 2023 Wk 12 recap CHI 12 MIN 10 CHI W
- 2023 Wk 6 Vikings at Bears, 2023 Wk 6 recap MIN 19 CHI 13 MIN W
- 2022 Wk 18 Vikings at Bears, 2022 Wk 18 recap MIN 29 CHI 13 MIN W
- 2022 Wk 5 Bears at Vikings MIN 29 CHI 22 MIN W
- 2021 Wk 18 Bears at Vikings, 2021 Wk 18 recap MIN 31 CHI 17 MIN W
- 2021 Wk 15 Vikings at Bears, 2021 Wk 15 recap MIN 17 CHI 9 MIN W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2022 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Bears | Stat | Vikings |
|---|---|---|
| 3-14 | Record | 13-4 |
| 19.2 | Points per game | 24.9 |
| 307.8 | Yards per game | 361.5 |
| 5.3 | Yards per play | 5.5 |
| 27.2 | Points allowed per game | 25.1 |
| 375.9 | Yards allowed per game | 388.7 |
Bears vs Vikings Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- MIN −8.5Vikings failed to cover by 1.5
- Total
- 44Over: 51 points scored (by 7)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vikings | 26.3 | 29 | +2.8 |
| Bears | 17.8 | 22 | +4.3 |
Both offenses beat the market's expectation, and the Fantasy tab shows who cashed in.
Betting Trends
Last 3 meetings: Vikings 2–1 ATS, overs 2–1.
Each team's 2022 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Chicago Bears
- Against the spread
- 2–2–1
- Over/under
- 2–3
- ATS as favorite
- 0–0–1
- ATS as underdog
- 2–2
- ATS on the road
- 1–2
Minnesota Vikings
- Against the spread
- 1–4
- Over/under
- 3–2
- ATS as favorite
- 1–3
- ATS as underdog
- 0–1
- ATS at home
- 1–2
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Bears vs Vikings Fantasy Outlook for 2026
One meeting is left on the 2026 schedule: Week 18 in Minnesota. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Bears or Vikings player start in Week 18? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Bears and Vikings players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Bears and Vikings defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere this matchup falls in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2022 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Bears vs Vikings Game FAQ
Who won the 2022 Bears vs Vikings Week 5 game?
The Minnesota Vikings beat the Chicago Bears 29–22 in Week 5 of the 2022 season. The game was played at U.S. Bank Stadium in Minneapolis, MN, on October 9, 2022. See the Vikings' 2022 schedule.
What was the final score of Bears vs Vikings?
The final score was Vikings 29, Bears 22. The Vikings led 21–10 at halftime, and the second half went Bears 12, Vikings 8.
What happened in the Bears vs Vikings game?
Minnesota led 21–10 at halftime after a 14-point second quarter and won 29–22, though Chicago took the second half 12–8. The Vikings finished with a 429–271 edge in total offense. Justin Jefferson led all players with 12 catches for 154 yards.
What was the game-winning score in Bears vs Vikings?
Kirk Cousins' 1-yard touchdown run with 2:26 left in the fourth quarter gave the Vikings a 29–22 lead they never gave up. It was the final score of the game.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Bears vs Vikings?
Justin Jefferson led the game with 30.3 PPR fantasy points, the WR2 of Week 5, on 12 catches for 154 yards. Dalvin Cook was next with 26.1 (RB6). See Justin Jefferson's 2022 game log.
Who led Bears vs Vikings in passing, rushing and receiving?
Kirk Cousins (MIN) led all passers with 32 of 41 for 296 yards, a touchdown and an interception. Dalvin Cook (MIN) led in rushing with 18 carries for 94 yards and 2 touchdowns. Justin Jefferson (MIN) led in receiving with 12 catches for 154 yards.
How many fantasy points did Justin Jefferson score against the Bears?
Justin Jefferson scored 30.3 points in PPR leagues, 24.3 in half-PPR and 18.3 in standard scoring against the Bears in Week 5 of the 2022 season, on 12 catches for 154 yards. He drew 33% of his team's targets.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Bears vs Vikings?
Dalvin Cook outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 26.1 PPR points on 14.9 xFP (+11.2). Alexander Mattison fell furthest short, with 7.0 points on 12.5 xFP (−5.5). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
How did the Vikings beat the Bears?
The Vikings beat the Bears 29–22 because they outgained them 429–271. Kirk Cousins' 1-yard touchdown run put them ahead for good.
What is the all-time Bears vs Vikings record?
The Vikings lead the all-time series 70–59–2 across 131 meetings since 1961, including a 0–1 record in the postseason.
When did the Bears and Vikings last play before this game?
Before Week 5 of 2022, they last met in the 2021 season on January 9, 2022, when the Vikings beat the Bears 31–17.
Have the Bears and Vikings met in the playoffs?
Yes, 1 time, most recently in the 1994 playoffs. The Bears are 1–0 against the Vikings in the postseason.
What was the closing spread for Bears vs Vikings?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Vikings −8.5, making the Minnesota Vikings 8.5-point favorites, with a closing total of 44. That implied about 26.3 points for the Vikings and 17.8 for the Bears.
Did Bears vs Vikings go over or under the total?
The game went over. The consensus closing total was 44, and the teams combined for 51 points, 7 over the number.
Who covered the spread in Bears vs Vikings?
The Bears covered as 8.5-point underdogs against the closing line of Vikings −8.5. The final margin was 7 points.
