Final2022 Week 1
Soldier Field, Chicago, IL|
San Francisco 49ers vs Chicago Bears, Week 1 2022
San Francisco 49ers
Away
10
Chicago Bears
HomeWon
19
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49ers | 0 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 10 |
| Bears | 0 | 0 | 7 | 12 | 19 |
SF 10 · CHI 19 Final
Passing leader
SF · QB
11.0PPR pts
13/28, 164 YDS, 1 INT
Top fantasy scorer
Deebo Samuel Sr.
SF · WR
12.6PPR pts
2 REC, 14 YDS, 1 RUSH TD
49ers leader
SF · WR
10.2PPR pts
4 REC, 62 YDS
Defensive playmaker
Talanoa Hufanga
SF
1 INT, 11 TKL
Bears 19, 49ers 10: Chicago rallies from 7 down at halftime
Chicago erased a 7–0 halftime deficit, outscoring San Francisco 19–3 after the break to win 19–10. San Francisco outgained the Bears 331–204.
The 49ers went 8-for-17 on third down and committed two turnovers.
Key advantages
- +1 turnover margin CHI 1 · SF 2 turnovers
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a 49er or Bear on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Bears Won
Chicago won the turnover battle.
| 49ers | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Turnovers | 1 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 331 | Total yards | 204 |
| 4.9 | Yards per play | 3.6 |
| 67 | Plays | 56 |
| 47% | Third-down conversion | 36% |
| 33:28 | Time of possession | 26:32 |
Scoring Summary
The Bears scored three touchdowns; the 49ers scored one touchdown and one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | SF | CHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| No scoring | ||||
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 10:11 | SF | Deebo Samuel 6-yard TD run Takes leadRobbie Gould XP | 7 | 0 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 8:22 | SF | Robbie Gould 25-yard FG Extends lead | 10 | 0 |
| 5:32 | CHI | Justin Fields → Dante Pettis, 51-yard TDCairo Santos XP | 10 | 7 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 12:45 | CHI | Justin Fields → Equanimeous St. Brown, 18-yard TD Game winnerXP missed | 10 | 13 |
| 7:21 | CHI | Khalil Herbert 3-yard TD run Extends leadXP missed | 10 | 19 |
Fantasy Points: 49ers vs Bears, Week 1 2022
Fantasy leaders
- Justin FieldsCHI · QB14.6 PTSQB20
- Dante PettisCHI · WR12.1 PTSWR33
- Deebo SamuelSF · WR11.6 PTSWR37
- Khalil HerbertCHI · RB11.3 PTSRB23
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.0 | QB28 | 13/28 | 164 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 54 | 0 | 50.3 | Start/Sit → | |
| 14.6 | QB20 | 8/17 | 121 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 28 | 0 | 85.7 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.1 | WR33 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 51 | 1 | ||
| 11.6 | WR37 | WR | 8 | 52 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 14 | 0 | ||
| 11.3 | RB23 | RB | 9 | 45 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -2 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 10.2 | WR44 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 62 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.8 | WR52 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 18 | 1 | ||
| 8.0 | RB38 | RB | 17 | 26 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 24 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.7 | WR63 | WR | 1 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 40 | 0 | ||
| 5.0 | RB54 | RB | 9 | 22 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 | ||
| 4.1 | RB59 | RB | 6 | 41 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 3.2 | WR95 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 22 | 0 | ||
| 3.0 | WR98 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 20 | 0 | ||
| 2.1 | TE40 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 11 | 0 | ||
| 1.9 | TE42 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 9 | 0 | ||
| 1.8 | WR112 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 8 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
San Francisco 49ers
Snap Share
Brandon AiyukWR67 snaps99%
Deebo SamuelWR56 snaps82%
Jauan JenningsWR41 snaps60%
Jeff WilsonRB40 snaps59%
Tyler KroftTE37 snaps54%
Target Share24 targets
- Deebo Samuel29%, 7 targets
- Jauan Jennings25%, 6 targets
- Brandon Aiyuk13%, 3 targets
- Tyler Kroft8%, 2 targets
- Ray-Ray McCloud8%, 2 targets
- Other17%, 4 targets
Carry Share37 carries
- Trey Lance35%, 13 carries
- Jeff Wilson24%, 9 carries
- Deebo Samuel22%, 8 carries
- Elijah Mitchell16%, 6 carries
- Brandon Aiyuk3%, 1 carries
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Darnell MooneyWR52 snaps90%
Cole KmetTE48 snaps83%
Equanimeous St. BrownWR44 snaps76%
David MontgomeryRB38 snaps66%
Ryan GriffinTE31 snaps53%
Target Share17 targets
- David Montgomery24%, 4 targets
- Equanimeous St. Brown18%, 3 targets
- Darnell Mooney18%, 3 targets
- Ryan Griffin12%, 2 targets
- Byron Pringle12%, 2 targets
- Other18%, 3 targets
Carry Share37 carries
- David Montgomery46%, 17 carries
- Justin Fields30%, 11 carries
- Khalil Herbert24%, 9 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 67 | 99% | 3 | 13% | 1 | |
| 52 | 90% | 3 | 18% | 0 | |
| 48 | 83% | 1 | 6% | 0 | |
| 56 | 82% | 7 | 29% | 8 | |
| 44 | 76% | 3 | 18% | 0 | |
| 38 | 66% | 4 | 24% | 17 | |
| 41 | 60% | 6 | 25% | 0 | |
| 40 | 59% | 2 | 8% | 9 | |
| 37 | 54% | 2 | 8% | 0 | |
| 31 | 53% | 2 | 12% | 0 | |
| 23 | 40% | 1 | 6% | 0 | |
| 17 | 29% | 1 | 6% | 9 | |
| 19 | 28% | 2 | 8% | 0 | |
| 19 | 28% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 18 | 26% | 2 | 8% | 0 | |
| 17 | 25% | 0 | 0% | 6 | |
| 10 | 17% | 2 | 12% | 0 | |
| 9 | 16% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 4 | 7% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 3 | 5% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 1% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+10.4Dante Pettis12.1 PTS vs 1.7 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−9.6David Montgomery8.0 PTS vs 17.6 xFP
- Highest expected volume20.2 xFPTrey Lance11.0 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trey LanceSF · QB | 11.0 | 20.2 | −9.2 | 100% | 28 att | — | 28 | 13 | 35% | 0 | 0% |
| David MontgomeryCHI · RB | 8.0 | 17.6 | −9.6 | 66% | 46% car | — | 0 | 17 | 46% | 4 | 24% |
| Deebo Samuel Sr.SF · WR | 12.6 | 16.8 | −4.2 | 82% | 27% tgt | — | 0 | 8 | 22% | 7 | 27% |
| Justin FieldsCHI · QB | 14.6 | 14.3 | +0.3 | 100% | 17 att | — | 17 | 11 | 30% | 0 | 0% |
| Jauan JenningsSF · WR | 10.2 | 10.0 | +0.2 | 60% | 23% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 23% |
| Jeff Wilson Jr.SF · RB | 5.0 | 9.1 | −4.1 | 59% | 24% car | — | 0 | 9 | 24% | 2 | 8% |
| Khalil HerbertCHI · RB | 11.3 | 7.5 | +3.8 | 29% | 24% car | — | 0 | 9 | 24% | 1 | 6% |
| Brandon AiyukSF · WR | 6.7 | 5.6 | +1.1 | 99% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 3 | 12% |
| Darnell MooneyCHI · WR | 1.8 | 5.0 | −3.2 | 90% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 18% |
| Equanimeous St. BrownCHI · WR | 8.8 | 5.0 | +3.8 | 76% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 18% |
| Elijah MitchellSF · RB | 4.1 | 3.9 | +0.2 | 25% | 16% car | — | 0 | 6 | 16% | 0 | 0% |
| Byron PringleCHI · WR | 3.2 | 3.3 | −0.1 | 17% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 12% |
| Kyle JuszczykSF · RB | 0.0 | 3.3 | −3.3 | — | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 8% |
| Ray-Ray McCloud IIISF · WR | 3.0 | 3.3 | −0.3 | 26% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 8% |
| Ross DwelleySF · TE | 2.1 | 3.3 | −1.2 | 28% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 8% |
| Ryan GriffinCHI · — | 0.0 | 3.3 | −3.3 | 53% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 12% |
| Tyler KroftSF · TE | 1.9 | 3.3 | −1.4 | 54% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 8% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 83% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 6% |
| Dante PettisCHI · WR | 12.1 | 1.7 | +10.4 | 40% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 6% |
Team totals: 49ers 26 targets and 37 carries; Bears 17 targets and 37 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2022 season: 1.67 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.64 per carry and 0.42 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Trey Lance Unlucky
SF · QB · 11.0 pts on 20.2 expected
13 of 28 passing for 164 yards, 1 interception; 13 carries for 54 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 20.2 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Start/Sit: Trey Lance →Justin Fields
CHI · QB · 14.6 pts on 14.3 expected
8 of 17 passing for 121 yards, 2 touchdowns, 1 interception; 11 carries for 28 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 14.3 expected.
Start/Sit: Justin Fields →Deebo Samuel Sr.
SF · WR · 12.6 pts on 16.8 expected
7 targets (27% of the team's), 2 catches for 14 yards; 8 carries (22% of the team's) for 52 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 16.8 expected.
Jauan Jennings
SF · WR · 10.2 pts on 10.0 expected
6 targets (23% of the team's), 4 catches for 62 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 10.0 expected.
Start/Sit: Jauan Jennings →David Montgomery Unlucky
CHI · RB · 8.0 pts on 17.6 expected
4 targets (24% of the team's), 3 catches for 24 yards; 17 carries (46% of the team's) for 26 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 17.6 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Start/Sit: David Montgomery →Khalil Herbert
CHI · RB · 11.3 pts on 7.5 expected
1 target (6% of the team's), 1 catch for -2 yards; 9 carries (24% of the team's) for 45 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 7.5 expected.
Start/Sit: Khalil Herbert →Dante Pettis Ran hot
CHI · WR · 12.1 pts on 1.7 expected
1 target (6% of the team's), 1 catch for 51 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 1.7 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2022 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | 49ers D | Bears D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 14.6 | 18.5 |
| RBs | 15.5 | 27.3 |
| WRs | 36.4 | 32.7 |
| TEs | 10.2 | 9.0 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Chicago opened at 32% win probability, fell as low as 6%, then rallied to win.
Bears win probability
Key Swings
- −19Samuel 6-yd TD run35% → 15%Q2 10:11
- −6Gould 25-yd FG13% → 7%Q3 8:22
- +19Fields → Pettis, 51-yd TD6% → 25%Q3 5:32
- +36Fields → Brown, 18-yd TD24% → 60%Q4 12:45
- +28Herbert 3-yd TD run68% → 96%Q4 7:21
Swing in Bears win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| San Francisco 49ers | Measure | Chicago Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 67 | Plays | 56 |
| 45% | Pass rate | 34% |
| 5.2 | Yds / dropback | 5.5 |
| 4.8 | Yds / carry | 2.7 |
| 8/17 | Third downs | 5/14 |
Efficiency edge Chicago ran 11 fewer plays than San Francisco.
- Top targets
- SF Samuel 27% · Jennings 23% · Aiyuk 12%
- CHI Montgomery 24% · Mooney 18% · Brown 18%
Possession Results
| Result | SF | CHI |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 1 | 3 |
| Field goals | 1 | 0 |
| Punts | 4 | 6 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 1 |
| Turnovers on downs | 2 | 0 |
CHI turnover edge: +1
- The 49ers opened the scoring on their fourth possession, a 7-play, 52-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
All 22 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 3 | -7 | 1:30 | Punt |
| SF | Q1 13:30 | 5 | 45 | 3:11 | Fumble |
| CHI | Q1 10:19 | 6 | 23 | 2:52 | Interception |
| SF | Q1 7:27 | 4 | 8 | 2:29 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 4:58 | 5 | 13 | 2:53 | Punt |
| SF | Q1 2:05 | 3 | 7 | 1:31 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 0:34 | 3 | 4 | 1:51 | Punt |
| SF | Q2 13:43 | 7 | 52 | 3:32 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 10:11 | 3 | 3 | 1:28 | Punt |
| SF | Q2 8:43 | 6 | 17 | 4:01 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 4:42 | 10 | 32 | 4:17 | Punt |
| SF | Q2 0:25 | 4 | 34 | 0:25 | End of half |
| SF | Q3 15:00 | 11 | 68 | 6:38 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q3 8:22 | 5 | 72 | 2:50 | Touchdown |
| SF | Q3 5:32 | 6 | 21 | 3:55 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 1:37 | 10 | 84 | 3:52 | Touchdown |
| SF | Q4 12:45 | 6 | 16 | 3:03 | Interception |
| CHI | Q4 9:42 | 5 | 21 | 2:21 | Touchdown |
| SF | Q4 7:21 | 12 | 36 | 3:43 | Downs |
| CHI | Q4 3:38 | 3 | 0 | 1:09 | Punt |
| SF | Q4 2:29 | 4 | 1 | 1:00 | Downs |
| CHI | Q4 1:29 | 3 | -2 | 1:29 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
49ers vs Bears Head-to-Head
The 49ers and Bears first met in 1950 and have played 71 times since.
- All-time series
- 37–33–149ers lead, 71 meetings since 1950
- Postseason
- 3–049ers won in 1984, 1988, and 1994
- Largest 49ers win
- 49–72003
- Largest Bears win
- 61–201965
Since 2021
3–1 49ers lead
4 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- 4
- B
- 4
- 4
Oldest to newest. 4 = 49ers win, B = Bears win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wk 17 Bears at 49ers, 2025 Wk 17 recap SF 42 CHI 38 SF W
- 2024 Wk 14 Bears at 49ers, 2024 Wk 14 recap SF 38 CHI 13 SF W
- 2022 Wk 1 49ers at Bears CHI 19 SF 10 CHI W
- 2021 Wk 8 49ers at Bears, 2021 Wk 8 recap SF 33 CHI 22 SF W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2022 regular season, from each game's box score.
| 49ers | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 13-4 | Record | 3-14 |
| 26.5 | Points per game | 19.2 |
| 365.6 | Yards per game | 307.8 |
| 5.9 | Yards per play | 5.3 |
| 16.3 | Points allowed per game | 27.2 |
| 300.6 | Yards allowed per game | 375.9 |
49ers vs Bears Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- SF −6.549ers failed to cover by 15.5
- Total
- 38Under: 29 points scored (by 9)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 49ers | 22.3 | 10 | −12.3 |
| Bears | 15.8 | 19 | +3.3 |
The Bears beat their implied total and the 49ers fell short of theirs; the Fantasy tab has the player lines behind it.
Betting Trends
Last 2 meetings: 49ers 1–1 ATS, overs and unders 1–1.
Each team's 2022 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
San Francisco 49ers
- Against the spread
- 0–1
- Over/under
- 0–1
- ATS as favorite
- 0–1
- ATS on the road
- 0–1
Chicago Bears
- Against the spread
- 1–0
- Over/under
- 0–1
- ATS as underdog
- 1–0
- ATS at home
- 1–0
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
49ers and Bears in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a 49er or a Bear, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your 49ers or Bears player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for 49ers and Bears players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the 49ers and Bears defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2022 Game Logs for Players in This Game
49ers vs Bears Game FAQ
Who won the 2022 49ers vs Bears Week 1 game?
The Chicago Bears beat the San Francisco 49ers 19–10 in Week 1 of the 2022 season. The game was played at Soldier Field in Chicago, IL, on September 11, 2022. See the Bears' 2022 schedule.
What was the final score of 49ers vs Bears?
The final score was Bears 19, 49ers 10. The 49ers led 7–0 at halftime, and the second half went 49ers 3, Bears 19.
What happened in the 49ers vs Bears game?
Chicago erased a 7–0 halftime deficit, outscoring San Francisco 19–3 after the break to win 19–10. San Francisco outgained the Bears 331–204. Justin Fields led all players with 8 of 17 passing for 121 yards and 2 touchdowns, plus 11 carries for 28 rushing yards. The 49ers committed 2 turnovers, the Bears 1.
What was the game-winning score in 49ers vs Bears?
Justin Fields' 18-yard touchdown pass to Equanimeous St. Brown with 12:45 left in the fourth quarter gave the Bears a 13–10 lead they never gave up.
Who scored the most fantasy points in 49ers vs Bears?
Justin Fields led the game with 14.6 PPR fantasy points, the QB20 of Week 1, on 8 of 17 passing for 121 yards and 2 touchdowns, plus 11 carries for 28 rushing yards. Dante Pettis was next with 12.1 (WR33). See Justin Fields's 2022 game log.
Who led 49ers vs Bears in passing, rushing and receiving?
Trey Lance (SF) led all passers with 13 of 28 for 164 yards and an interception. Trey Lance (SF) led in rushing with 13 carries for 54 yards. Jauan Jennings (SF) led in receiving with 4 catches for 62 yards.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in 49ers vs Bears?
Dante Pettis outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 12.1 PPR points on 1.7 xFP (+10.4). David Montgomery fell furthest short, with 8.0 points on 17.6 xFP (−9.6). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
How did the Bears come back to beat the 49ers?
The Bears' chances of winning fell as low as 6% in the third quarter. Justin Fields' 18-yard touchdown pass to Equanimeous St. Brown in the fourth quarter was the biggest swing of the game. Justin Fields' 18-yard touchdown pass to Equanimeous St. Brown then put them ahead for good.
Which team won the turnover battle in 49ers vs Bears?
The Bears won the turnover battle 2–1: the 49ers gave the ball away 2 times and the Bears 1 time. The Bears won the game.
What is the all-time 49ers vs Bears record?
The 49ers lead the all-time series 37–33–1 across 71 meetings since 1950, including a 3–0 record in the postseason.
When did the 49ers and Bears last play before this game?
Before Week 1 of 2022, they last met in the 2021 season on October 31, 2021, when the 49ers beat the Bears 33–22.
Have the 49ers and Bears met in the playoffs?
Yes, 3 times, most recently in the 1994 playoffs. The 49ers are 3–0 against the Bears in the postseason.
What was the closing spread for 49ers vs Bears?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was 49ers −6.5, making the San Francisco 49ers 6.5-point favorites, with a closing total of 38. That implied about 22.3 points for the 49ers and 15.8 for the Bears.
Did 49ers vs Bears go over or under the total?
The game went under. The consensus closing total was 38, and the teams combined for 29 points, 9 under the number.
Who covered the spread in 49ers vs Bears?
The Bears covered as 6.5-point underdogs against the closing line of 49ers −6.5. The final margin was 9 points.
