Final2022 Week 2
Lambeau Field, Green Bay, WI|
Chicago Bears vs Green Bay Packers, Week 2 2022
Chicago Bears
Away
10
Green Bay Packers
HomeWon
27
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bears | 7 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 |
| Packers | 3 | 21 | 0 | 3 | 27 |
CHI 10 · GB 27 Final
Passing leader
GB · QB
16.4PPR pts
19/25, 234 YDS, 2 TD
Top fantasy scorer
Aaron Jones Sr.
GB · RB
32.0PPR pts
15 ATT, 132 YDS, 1 TD, 3 REC, 38 REC YDS, 1 REC TD
Bears leader
CHI · RB
15.6PPR pts
15 ATT, 122 YDS, 2 REC, 14 REC YDS
Defensive playmaker
Jaire Alexander
GB
1 INT, 3 TKL
Packers 27, Bears 10: Green Bay beats Chicago
Green Bay led 24–7 at halftime after a 21-point second quarter to win 27–10. The Packers finished with a 414–228 edge in total offense and averaged 6.3 yards per play.
The Bears went 1-for-7 on third down and committed one turnover, while the Packers kept the ball for 37:15.
The two teams meet again in Week 5 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +0.7 yards/play GB 6.3 · CHI 5.6
- +186 total yards GB 414 · CHI 228
- +42% third-down rate GB 56% · CHI 14%
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Bear or Packer on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Packers Won
Green Bay won the efficiency, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Bears | Stat | Packers |
|---|---|---|
| 5.6 | Yards per play | 6.3 |
| 228 | Total yards | 414 |
| 14% | Third-down conversion | 56% |
| Other team stats | ||
| 41 | Plays | 66 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 1 |
| 22:45 | Time of possession | 37:15 |
Scoring Summary
The Packers scored three touchdowns and two field goals; the Bears scored one touchdown and one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | CHI | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 8:33 | GB | Mason Crosby 40-yard FG Takes lead | 0 | 3 |
| 4:37 | CHI | Justin Fields 3-yard TD run Takes leadCairo Santos XP | 7 | 3 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 14:54 | GB | Aaron Jones 15-yard TD run Takes leadMason Crosby XP | 7 | 10 |
| 4:36 | GB | Aaron Rodgers → Aaron Jones, 8-yard TD Extends leadMason Crosby XP | 7 | 17 |
| 0:32 | GB | Aaron Rodgers → Allen Lazard, 5-yard TD Extends leadMason Crosby XP | 7 | 24 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 5:11 | CHI | Cairo Santos 44-yard FG | 10 | 24 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 2:28 | GB | Mason Crosby 28-yard FG Extends lead | 10 | 27 |
Fantasy Points: Bears vs Packers, Week 2 2022
Fantasy leaders
- Aaron JonesGB · RB32.0 PTSRB2
- David MontgomeryCHI · RB15.6 PTSRB10
- Aaron RodgersGB · QB15.4 PTSQB17
- Sammy WatkinsGB · WR12.3 PTSWR36
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15.4 | QB17 | 19/25 | 234 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 131.1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.8 | QB27 | 7/11 | 70 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 20 | 1 | 43.7 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32.0 | RB2 | RB | 15 | 132 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 38 | 1 | ||
| 15.6 | RB10 | RB | 15 | 122 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 12.3 | WR36 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 93 | 0 | ||
| 9.3 | WR50 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 13 | 1 | ||
| 7.7 | RB36 | RB | 18 | 61 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.7 | WR66 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 37 | 0 | ||
| 5.9 | WR73 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 39 | 0 | ||
| 5.1 | RB48 | RB | 4 | 38 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.7 | WR78 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 27 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.9 | WR82 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 9 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.1 | TE33 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.8 | TE36 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 18 | 0 | ||
| 0.6 | WR112 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | -4 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fantasy Usage
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Darnell MooneyWR37 snaps90%
Cole KmetTE35 snaps85%
David MontgomeryRB33 snaps80%
Equanimeous St. BrownWR29 snaps71%
Dante PettisWR23 snaps56%
Target Share11 targets
- Equanimeous St. Brown36%, 4 targets
- David Montgomery18%, 2 targets
- Darnell Mooney18%, 2 targets
- Ryan Griffin9%, 1 targets
- Cole Kmet9%, 1 targets
- Other9%, 1 targets
Carry Share27 carries
- David Montgomery56%, 15 carries
- Justin Fields30%, 8 carries
- Khalil Herbert15%, 4 carries
Green Bay Packers
Snap Share
Allen LazardWR55 snaps81%
Sammy WatkinsWR44 snaps65%
Aaron JonesRB40 snaps59%
AJ DillonRB39 snaps57%
Marcedes LewisTE31 snaps46%
Target Share25 targets
- Sammy Watkins16%, 4 targets
- Randall Cobb12%, 3 targets
- Aaron Jones12%, 3 targets
- Allen Lazard12%, 3 targets
- AJ Dillon12%, 3 targets
- Other36%, 9 targets
Carry Share38 carries
- AJ Dillon47%, 18 carries
- Aaron Jones39%, 15 carries
- Aaron Rodgers13%, 5 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37 | 90% | 2 | 18% | 0 | |
| 35 | 85% | 1 | 9% | 0 | |
| 55 | 81% | 3 | 12% | 0 | |
| 33 | 80% | 2 | 18% | 15 | |
| 29 | 71% | 4 | 36% | 0 | |
| 44 | 65% | 4 | 16% | 0 | |
| 40 | 59% | 3 | 12% | 15 | |
| 39 | 57% | 3 | 12% | 18 | |
| 23 | 56% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 31 | 46% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 27 | 40% | 2 | 8% | 0 | |
| 25 | 37% | 3 | 12% | 0 | |
| 14 | 34% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 22 | 32% | 3 | 12% | 0 | |
| 21 | 31% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 20 | 29% | 3 | 12% | 0 | |
| 11 | 27% | 1 | 9% | 0 | |
| 15 | 22% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 8 | 20% | 1 | 9% | 4 | |
| 2 | 5% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 1% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+17.4Aaron Jones Sr.32.0 PTS vs 14.6 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−8.9AJ Dillon7.7 PTS vs 16.6 xFP
- Highest expected volume16.6 xFPAJ Dillon7.7 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AJ DillonGB · RB | 7.7 | 16.6 | −8.9 | 57% | 47% car | — | 0 | 18 | 47% | 3 | 12% |
| Aaron Jones Sr.GB · RB | 32.0 | 14.6 | +17.4 | 59% | 39% car | — | 0 | 15 | 39% | 3 | 12% |
| Aaron RodgersGB · QB | 16.4 | 13.8 | +2.6 | 100% | 25 att | — | 25 | 5 | 13% | 0 | 0% |
| David MontgomeryCHI · RB | 15.6 | 13.0 | +2.6 | 80% | 56% car | — | 0 | 15 | 56% | 2 | 18% |
| Justin FieldsCHI · QB | 9.8 | 9.8 | 0.0 | 100% | 11 att | — | 11 | 8 | 30% | 0 | 0% |
| Equanimeous St. BrownCHI · WR | 5.9 | 6.7 | −0.8 | 71% | 36% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 36% |
| Sammy WatkinsGB · WR | 12.3 | 6.7 | +5.6 | 65% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 16% |
| Allen LazardGB · WR | 9.3 | 5.0 | +4.3 | 81% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 12% |
| Christian WatsonGB · WR | 3.9 | 5.0 | −1.1 | 32% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 12% |
| Randall CobbGB · WR | 6.7 | 5.0 | +1.7 | 29% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 12% |
| Romeo DoubsGB · WR | 4.7 | 5.0 | −0.3 | 37% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 12% |
| Khalil HerbertCHI · RB | 5.1 | 4.2 | +0.9 | 20% | 15% car | — | 0 | 4 | 15% | 1 | 9% |
| Darnell MooneyCHI · WR | 0.6 | 3.3 | −2.7 | 90% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 18% |
| Robert TonyanGB · TE | 3.1 | 3.3 | −0.2 | 40% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 8% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 85% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 9% |
| Ryan GriffinCHI · — | 2.8 | 1.7 | +1.1 | 27% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 9% |
| Tyler DavisGB · — | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 31% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
Team totals: Bears 11 targets and 27 carries; Packers 25 targets and 38 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2022 season: 1.67 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.64 per carry and 0.42 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Justin Fields
CHI · QB · 9.8 pts on 9.8 expected
7 of 11 passing for 70 yards, 1 interception; 8 carries for 20 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 9.8 expected.
Start/Sit: Justin Fields →Aaron Rodgers
GB · QB · 16.4 pts on 13.8 expected
19 of 25 passing for 234 yards, 2 touchdowns; 5 carries for 10 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 13.8 expected.
Start/Sit: Aaron Rodgers →David Montgomery
CHI · RB · 15.6 pts on 13.0 expected
2 targets (18% of the team's), 2 catches for 14 yards; 15 carries (56% of the team's) for 122 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 13.0 expected.
Start/Sit: David Montgomery →Equanimeous St. Brown Volume, no payoff
CHI · WR · 5.9 pts on 6.7 expected
4 targets (36% of the team's), 2 catches for 39 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 6.7 expected.
AJ Dillon Unlucky
GB · RB · 7.7 pts on 16.6 expected
3 targets (12% of the team's), 1 catch for 6 yards; 18 carries (47% of the team's) for 61 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 16.6 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Trend: Season high in carries (18).
Aaron Jones Sr. Ran hot
GB · RB · 32.0 pts on 14.6 expected
3 targets (12% of the team's), 3 catches for 38 yards and 1 touchdown; 15 carries (39% of the team's) for 132 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 14.6 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Trend: Season high in carries (15).
Sammy Watkins Ran hot
GB · WR · 12.3 pts on 6.7 expected
4 targets (16% of the team's), 3 catches for 93 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 6.7 points; efficiency supplied the rest.
Ryan Griffin
CHI · — · 2.8 pts on 1.7 expected
1 target (9% of the team's), 1 catch for 18 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 1.7 expected.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Chicago Bears
- ▼Stock down: Ryan Griffin played 27% of the snaps, down from a 53% season average.
Green Bay Packers
- ▼Stock down: Christian Watson played 32% of the snaps, down from a 66% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Randall Cobb played 29% of the snaps, down from a 61% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Romeo Doubs played 37% of the snaps, down from a 57% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2022 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Bears D | Packers D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 18.5 | 15.0 |
| RBs | 27.3 | 23.7 |
| WRs | 32.7 | 30.5 |
| TEs | 9.0 | 9.8 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Green Bay opened at 77% win probability and passed 98% before halftime on the way to the win.
Packers win probability
Key Swings
- +7Crosby 40-yd FG76% → 83%Q1 8:33
- −18Fields 3-yd TD run82% → 64%Q1 4:37
- +20Jones 15-yd TD run62% → 82%Q2 14:54
- +13Rodgers → Jones, 8-yd TD80% → 94%Q2 4:36
- +5Rodgers → Lazard, 5-yd TD94% → 99%Q2 0:32
Swing in Packers win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Chicago Bears | Measure | Green Bay Packers |
|---|---|---|
| 41 | Plays | 66 |
| 34% | Pass rate | 42% |
| 3.4 | Yds / dropback | 7.5 |
| 6.7 | Yds / carry | 5.3 |
| 1/7 | Third downs | 5/9 |
Efficiency edge Green Bay ran 25 more plays and gained 4.1 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- CHI Brown 36% · Mooney 18% · Montgomery 18%
- GB Watkins 16% · Jones 12% · Dillon 12%
Possession Results
| Result | CHI | GB |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 1 | 3 |
| Field goals | 1 | 2 |
| Punts | 4 | 2 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 1 |
| Turnovers on downs | 1 | 0 |
- The Packers opened the scoring on their first possession, a 13-play, 53-yard drive that ended in a field goal.
- The Packers drained the clock with two second-half drives of five to six minutes.
All 18 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB | Q1 15:00 | 13 | 53 | 6:27 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q1 8:33 | 7 | 71 | 3:56 | Touchdown |
| GB | Q1 4:37 | 9 | 75 | 4:43 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 14:54 | 3 | -2 | 2:05 | Punt |
| GB | Q2 12:49 | 3 | -11 | 0:59 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 11:50 | 3 | -2 | 1:39 | Punt |
| GB | Q2 10:11 | 9 | 54 | 5:35 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 4:36 | 3 | 4 | 1:26 | Punt |
| GB | Q2 3:10 | 7 | 67 | 2:38 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 0:32 | 1 | 3 | 0:32 | End of half |
| CHI | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 7 | 2:00 | Punt |
| GB | Q3 13:00 | 6 | 55 | 3:47 | Fumble |
| CHI | Q3 9:13 | 7 | 43 | 4:02 | Field goal |
| GB | Q3 5:11 | 7 | 16 | 5:18 | Punt |
| CHI | Q4 14:53 | 13 | 89 | 6:46 | Downs |
| GB | Q4 8:07 | 10 | 89 | 5:39 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q4 2:28 | 2 | 0 | 0:19 | Interception |
| GB | Q4 2:09 | 4 | 10 | 2:09 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Bears vs Packers Head-to-Head
The Bears and Packers first met in 1921 and have played 213 times since. They have been NFC North rivals since 1970.
- All-time series
- 109–98–6Packers lead, 213 meetings since 1921
- Postseason
- 2–1Bears won in 1941 and 2025; Packers won in 2010
- Largest Bears win
- 61–71980
- Largest Packers win
- 49–01962
Since 2021
8–3 Packers lead
11 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- P
- P
- P
- P
- P
- P
- P
- B
- P
- B
- B
Oldest to newest. P = Packers win, B = Bears win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 5 Bears at Packers Upcoming
- Week 16 Packers at Bears Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wild Card Packers at Bears, 2025 Wild Card recap CHI 31 GB 27 CHI W
- 2025 Wk 16 Packers at Bears, 2025 Wk 16 recap CHI 22 GB 16 CHI W
- 2025 Wk 14 Bears at Packers, 2025 Wk 14 recap GB 28 CHI 21 GB W
- 2024 Wk 18 Bears at Packers, 2024 Wk 18 recap CHI 24 GB 22 CHI W
- 2024 Wk 11 Packers at Bears, 2024 Wk 11 recap GB 20 CHI 19 GB W
- 2023 Wk 18 Bears at Packers, 2023 Wk 18 recap GB 17 CHI 9 GB W
- 2023 Wk 1 Packers at Bears, 2023 Wk 1 recap GB 38 CHI 20 GB W
- 2022 Wk 13 Packers at Bears, 2022 Wk 13 recap GB 28 CHI 19 GB W
- 2022 Wk 2 Bears at Packers GB 27 CHI 10 GB W
- 2021 Wk 14 Bears at Packers, 2021 Wk 14 recap GB 45 CHI 30 GB W
- 2021 Wk 6 Packers at Bears, 2021 Wk 6 recap GB 24 CHI 14 GB W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2022 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Bears | Stat | Packers |
|---|---|---|
| 3-14 | Record | 8-9 |
| 19.2 | Points per game | 21.8 |
| 307.8 | Yards per game | 337.9 |
| 5.3 | Yards per play | 5.5 |
| 27.2 | Points allowed per game | 21.8 |
| 375.9 | Yards allowed per game | 336.5 |
Bears vs Packers Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- GB −10Packers covered by 7
- Total
- 41.5Under: 37 points scored (by 4.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Packers | 25.8 | 27 | +1.3 |
| Bears | 15.8 | 10 | −5.8 |
The Packers beat their implied total and the Bears fell short of theirs; the Fantasy tab has the player lines behind it.
Betting Trends
Last 3 meetings: Packers 3–0 ATS, unders 2–1.
Each team's 2022 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Chicago Bears
- Against the spread
- 1–1
- Over/under
- 0–2
- ATS as underdog
- 1–1
- ATS on the road
- 0–1
Green Bay Packers
- Against the spread
- 1–1
- Over/under
- 0–2
- ATS as favorite
- 1–0
- ATS as underdog
- 0–1
- ATS at home
- 1–0
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Bears vs Packers Fantasy Outlook for 2026
Two meetings are left on the 2026 schedule: Week 5 in Green Bay and Week 16 in Chicago. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Bears or Packers player start in Week 5? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Bears and Packers players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Bears and Packers defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere these two matchups fall in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2022 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Bears vs Packers Game FAQ
Who won the 2022 Bears vs Packers Week 2 game?
The Green Bay Packers beat the Chicago Bears 27–10 in Week 2 of the 2022 season. The game was played at Lambeau Field in Green Bay, WI, on September 18, 2022. See the Packers' 2022 schedule.
What was the final score of Bears vs Packers?
The final score was Packers 27, Bears 10. The Packers led 24–7 at halftime, and the second half went Bears 3, Packers 3.
What happened in the Bears vs Packers game?
Green Bay led 24–7 at halftime after a 21-point second quarter to win 27–10. The Packers finished with a 414–228 edge in total offense and averaged 6.3 yards per play. Aaron Jones led all players with 3 catches for 38 yards and a touchdown, plus 15 carries for 132 rushing yards and a touchdown.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Bears vs Packers?
Aaron Jones led the game with 32.0 PPR fantasy points, the RB2 of Week 2, on 3 catches for 38 yards and a touchdown, plus 15 carries for 132 rushing yards and a touchdown. David Montgomery was next with 15.6 (RB10). See Aaron Jones's 2022 game log.
Who led Bears vs Packers in passing, rushing and receiving?
Aaron Rodgers (GB) led all passers with 19 of 25 for 234 yards and 2 touchdowns. Aaron Jones (GB) led in rushing with 15 carries for 132 yards and a touchdown. Sammy Watkins (GB) led in receiving with 3 catches for 93 yards.
How many fantasy points did Aaron Jones score against the Bears?
Aaron Jones scored 32.0 points in PPR leagues, 30.5 in half-PPR and 29.0 in standard scoring against the Bears in Week 2 of the 2022 season, on 3 catches for 38 yards and a touchdown, plus 15 carries for 132 rushing yards and a touchdown.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Bears vs Packers?
Aaron Jones Sr. outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 32.0 PPR points on 14.6 xFP (+17.4). AJ Dillon fell furthest short, with 7.7 points on 16.6 xFP (−8.9). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Bears vs Packers?
AJ Dillon had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 16.6 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 7.7. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Packers beat the Bears?
The Packers beat the Bears 27–10 because they averaged 6.3 yards per play to 5.6 and outgained them 414–228.
What is the all-time Bears vs Packers record?
The Packers lead the all-time series 109–98–6 across 213 meetings since 1921, including a 1–2 record in the postseason.
When did the Bears and Packers last play before this game?
Before Week 2 of 2022, they last met in the 2021 season on December 12, 2021, when the Packers beat the Bears 45–30.
Have the Bears and Packers met in the playoffs?
Yes, 3 times, most recently in the 2025 playoffs. The Bears are 2–1 against the Packers in the postseason.
What was the closing spread for Bears vs Packers?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Packers −10, making the Green Bay Packers 10-point favorites, with a closing total of 41.5. That implied about 25.8 points for the Packers and 15.8 for the Bears.
Did Bears vs Packers go over or under the total?
The game went under. The consensus closing total was 41.5, and the teams combined for 37 points, 4.5 under the number.
Who covered the spread in Bears vs Packers?
The Packers covered by 7 against the closing line of Packers −10. The final margin was 17 points.
