Chicago Bears vs San Francisco 49ers, Week 17 2025
Chicago Bears
Away
38
San Francisco 49ers
HomeWon
42
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bears | 14 | 7 | 7 | 10 | 38 |
| 49ers | 14 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 42 |
CHI 38SF 42 Final
Passing leader
23.0PPR pts
25/42, 330 YDS, 2 TD
Top fantasy scorer
28.1PPR pts
23 ATT, 140 YDS, 1 TD, 4 REC, 41 REC YDS
Bears leader
Luther Burden III
27.8PPR pts
8 REC, 138 YDS, 1 TD
Defensive playmaker
T.J. Edwards
1 INT, 1 TD, 9 TKL
49ers 42, Bears 38: San Francisco beats Chicago
San Francisco led 28–21 at halftime and won 42–38, though Chicago took the second half 17–14. The 49ers finished with a 496–440 edge in total offense and averaged 7.3 yards per play.
The Bears went 6-for-12 on third down, while the 49ers kept the ball for 33:33.
Key advantages
- +0.4 yards/play SF 7.3 · CHI 6.9
- +56 total yards SF 496 · CHI 440
- +20% third-down rate SF 70% · CHI 50%
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Bear or 49er on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the 49ers Won
San Francisco won the efficiency, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Bears | Stat | 49ers |
|---|---|---|
| 6.9 | Yards per play | 7.3 |
| 440 | Total yards | 496 |
| 50% | Third-down conversion | 70% |
| Other team stats | ||
| 64 | Plays | 68 |
| 0 | Turnovers | 1 |
| 26:27 | Time of possession | 33:33 |
Scoring Summary
The 49ers scored six touchdowns; the Bears scored five touchdowns and one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | CHI | SF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 14:45 | CHI | T.J. Edwards 34-yard interception return TD Takes leadCairo Santos XP | 7 | 0 |
| 10:57 | SF | Brock Purdy → Jake Tonges, 1-yard TD Ties gameEddy Pineiro XP | 7 | 7 |
| 4:52 | SF | Brock Purdy 10-yard TD run Takes leadEddy Pineiro XP | 7 | 14 |
| 2:58 | CHI | Caleb Williams → Luther Burden III, 35-yard TD Ties gameCairo Santos XP | 14 | 14 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 13:44 | SF | Christian McCaffrey 5-yard TD run Takes leadEddy Pineiro XP | 14 | 21 |
| 12:20 | CHI | Caleb Williams → Colston Loveland, 36-yard TD Ties gameCairo Santos XP | 21 | 21 |
| 3:23 | SF | Brock Purdy 3-yard TD run Takes leadEddy Pineiro XP | 21 | 28 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 9:51 | CHI | D'Andre Swift 2-yard TD run Ties gameCairo Santos XP | 28 | 28 |
| 4:52 | SF | Brock Purdy → Kyle Juszczyk, 6-yard TD Takes leadEddy Pineiro XP | 28 | 35 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 14:54 | CHI | D'Andre Swift 22-yard TD run Ties gameCairo Santos XP | 35 | 35 |
| 5:22 | CHI | Cairo Santos 29-yard FG Takes lead | 38 | 35 |
| 2:15 | SF | Brock Purdy → Jauan Jennings, 38-yard TD Game winnerEddy Pineiro XP | 38 | 42 |
Fantasy Points: Bears vs 49ers, Week 17 2025
Fantasy leaders
- Brock Purdy37.9 PTSQB1
- Christian McCaffrey28.1 PTSRB4
- Luther Burden27.8 PTSWR1
- Caleb Williams23.0 PTSQB7
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caleb Williams | 23.0 | QB7 | 25/42 | 330 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 18 | 0 | 100.3 | Start/Sit → |
| Brock Purdy | 37.9 | QB1 | 24/33 | 303 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 28 | 2 | 118.6 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christian McCaffrey | 28.1 | RB4 | RB | 23 | 140 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 41 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Luther Burden | 27.8 | WR1 | WR | — | — | — | 9 | 8 | 138 | 1 | |
| D'Andre Swift | 21.9 | RB8 | RB | 9 | 54 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 25 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Colston Loveland | 21.4 | TE2 | TE | — | — | — | 10 | 6 | 94 | 1 | Start/Sit → |
| Jake Tonges | 19.0 | TE3 | TE | — | — | — | 9 | 7 | 60 | 1 | |
| Ricky Pearsall | 13.5 | WR22 | WR | — | — | — | 8 | 5 | 85 | 0 | |
| Jauan Jennings | 12.2 | WR26 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 42 | 1 | Start/Sit → |
| Kyle Monangai | 7.7 | RB32 | RB | 8 | 38 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Jahdae Walker | 5.0 | WR68 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 30 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Demarcus Robinson | 5.0 | WR65 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 30 | 0 | |
| Brian Robinson | 3.8 | RB48 | RB | 4 | 22 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | |
| Cole Kmet | 3.6 | TE36 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 16 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Kendrick Bourne | 3.5 | WR82 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 25 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Durham Smythe | 2.1 | TE46 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| DJ Moore | 1.7 | WR101 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 1 | 7 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Skyy Moore | 1.0 | WR117 | WR | 1 | 10 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → |
| Devin Duvernay | 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Target Share39 targets
- Colston Loveland26%, 10 targets
- Luther Burden23%, 9 targets
- DJ Moore10%, 4 targets
- Kyle Monangai10%, 4 targets
- Jahdae Walker10%, 4 targets
- Other21%, 8 targets
Carry Share22 carries
- , 9 carries
- , 8 carries
- , 5 carries
San Francisco 49ers
Snap Share
Target Share31 targets
- Jake Tonges29%, 9 targets
- Ricky Pearsall26%, 8 targets
- Christian McCaffrey19%, 6 targets
- Jauan Jennings13%, 4 targets
- Demarcus Robinson6%, 2 targets
- Other6%, 2 targets
Carry Share34 carries
- , 23 carries
- , 6 carries
- , 4 carries
- , 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DJ Moore | 61 | 92% | 4 | 10% | 0 |
| Jauan Jennings | 65 | 90% | 4 | 13% | 0 |
| Christian McCaffrey | 61 | 85% | 6 | 19% | 23 |
| Colston Loveland | 54 | 82% | 10 | 26% | 0 |
| Ricky Pearsall | 58 | 81% | 8 | 26% | 0 |
| Jake Tonges | 50 | 69% | 9 | 29% | 0 |
| Jahdae Walker | 41 | 62% | 4 | 10% | 0 |
| Cole Kmet | 40 | 61% | 3 | 8% | 0 |
| D'Andre Swift | 39 | 59% | 3 | 8% | 9 |
| Luther Burden | 38 | 58% | 9 | 23% | 0 |
| Kyle Monangai | 27 | 41% | 4 | 10% | 8 |
| Luke Farrell | 27 | 38% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
| Demarcus Robinson | 25 | 35% | 2 | 6% | 0 |
| Kendrick Bourne | 19 | 26% | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| Durham Smythe | 14 | 21% | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| Devin Duvernay | 11 | 17% | 1 | 3% | 0 |
| Brian Robinson | 11 | 15% | 1 | 3% | 4 |
| Skyy Moore | 4 | 6% | 0 | 0% | 1 |
| Brayden Willis | 1 | 1% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+19.4Brock Purdy37.9 PTS vs 18.5 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−5.1DJ Moore1.7 PTS vs 6.8 xFP
- Highest expected volume25.1 xFPChristian McCaffrey28.1 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christian McCaffreySF · RB | 28.1 | 25.1 | +3.0 | 85% | 68% car | — | 0 | 23 | 68% | 6 | 18% |
| Caleb WilliamsCHI · QB | 23.0 | 21.9 | +1.1 | 100% | 42 att | — | 42 | 5 | 23% | 0 | 0% |
| Brock PurdySF · QB | 37.9 | 18.5 | +19.4 | 100% | 33 att | — | 33 | 6 | 18% | 0 | 0% |
| Colston LovelandCHI · TE | 21.4 | 17.0 | +4.4 | 82% | 26% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 10 | 26% |
| Jake TongesSF · TE | 19.0 | 15.3 | +3.7 | 69% | 27% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 9 | 27% |
| Luther Burden IIICHI · WR | 27.8 | 15.3 | +12.5 | 58% | 23% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 9 | 23% |
| Ricky PearsallSF · WR | 13.5 | 13.6 | −0.1 | 81% | 24% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 24% |
| Kyle MonangaiCHI · RB | 7.7 | 12.0 | −4.3 | 41% | 36% car | — | 0 | 8 | 36% | 4 | 10% |
| D'Andre SwiftCHI · RB | 21.9 | 10.9 | +11.0 | 59% | 41% car | — | 0 | 9 | 41% | 3 | 8% |
| DJ MooreCHI · WR | 1.7 | 6.8 | −5.1 | 92% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 10% |
| Jahdae WalkerCHI · WR | 5.0 | 6.8 | −1.8 | 62% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 10% |
| Jauan JenningsSF · WR | 12.2 | 6.8 | +5.4 | 90% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 12% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 3.6 | 5.1 | −1.5 | 61% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 8% |
| Brian Robinson Jr.SF · RB | 3.8 | 4.3 | −0.5 | 15% | 12% car | — | 0 | 4 | 12% | 1 | 3% |
| Demarcus RobinsonSF · WR | 5.0 | 3.4 | +1.6 | 35% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
| Kyle JuszczykSF · RB | 9.4 | 3.4 | +6.0 | — | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
| Devin DuvernayCHI · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 17% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Durham SmytheCHI · TE | 2.1 | 1.7 | +0.4 | 21% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Kendrick BourneSF · WR | 3.5 | 1.7 | +1.8 | 26% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Skyy MooreSF · WR | 1.0 | 0.6 | +0.4 | 6% | 3% car | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Bears 39 targets and 22 carries; 49ers 33 targets and 34 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2025 season: 1.70 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.65 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Caleb Williams
25 of 42 passing for 330 yards, 2 touchdowns; 5 carries for 18 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 21.9 expected.
Best score since Week 10.
Brock Purdy Ran hot
24 of 33 passing for 303 yards, 3 touchdowns, 1 interception; 6 carries for 28 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 18.5 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Best fantasy game of the season.
Colston Loveland
10 targets (26% of the team's), 6 catches for 94 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 17.0 expected.
Season high in targets (10). Best score since Week 9.
Luther Burden III Ran hot
9 targets (23% of the team's), 8 catches for 138 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 15.3 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Season high in targets (9). Best fantasy game of the season.
Christian McCaffrey Strong role
6 targets (18% of the team's), 4 catches for 41 yards; 23 carries (68% of the team's) for 140 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 25.1 expected.
A touchdown in 7 of the last 8 games.
Jake Tonges
9 targets (27% of the team's), 7 catches for 60 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 15.3 expected.
Best fantasy game of the season.
D'Andre Swift Ran hot
3 targets (8% of the team's), 2 catches for 25 yards; 9 carries (41% of the team's) for 54 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 10.9 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
DJ Moore Unlucky
4 targets (10% of the team's), 1 catch for 7 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 6.8 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Chicago Bears
- Stock up: Colston Loveland played 82% of the snaps, up from a 61% season average.
- Stock up: Luther Burden III played 58% of the snaps, up from a 36% season average.
- Stock up: Jahdae Walker played 62% of the snaps, up from a 8% season average.
San Francisco 49ers
- Stock up: Jake Tonges played 69% of the snaps, up from a 33% season average.
- Stock down: Kendrick Bourne played 26% of the snaps, down from a 59% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2025 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Bears D | 49ers D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 19.1 | 17.5 |
| RBs | 21.7 | 21.2 |
| WRs | 35.5 | 32.1 |
| TEs | 13.1 | 14.8 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
San Francisco opened at 63% win probability, fell as low as 14%, then rallied to win.
49ers win probability
Key Swings
- −26Swift 2-yd TD run85% → 58%Q3 9:51
- +29Purdy → Juszczyk, 6-yd TD58% → 86%Q3 4:52
- −32Swift 22-yd TD run89% → 57%Q4 14:54
- −28Santos 29-yd FG54% → 26%Q4 5:22
- +81Purdy → Jennings, 38-yd TD14% → 94%Q4 2:15
Swing in 49ers win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Chicago Bears | Measure | San Francisco 49ers |
|---|---|---|
| 64 | Plays | 68 |
| 66% | Pass rate | 50% |
| 7.9 | Yds / dropback | 8.7 |
| 5.0 | Yds / carry | 5.9 |
| 6/12 | Third downs | 7/10 |
Efficiency edge San Francisco ran 4 more plays and gained 0.8 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- CHI Loveland 26% · Burden 23% · Moore 10%
- SF Tonges 27% · Pearsall 24% · McCaffrey 18%
Possession Results
| Result | CHI | SF |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 4 | 6 |
| Field goals | 1 | 0 |
| Punts | 3 | 2 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 1 |
CHI turnover edge: +1
- The 49ers opened the scoring on their second possession, a 9-play, 65-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
All 19 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF | Q1 15:00 | 1 | 0 | 0:15 | Interception |
| SF | Q1 14:45 | 9 | 65 | 3:48 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q1 10:57 | 3 | 7 | 0:58 | Punt |
| SF | Q1 9:59 | 4 | 15 | 2:15 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 7:44 | 3 | 6 | 1:31 | Punt |
| SF | Q1 6:13 | 3 | 66 | 1:21 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q1 4:52 | 5 | 77 | 1:54 | Touchdown |
| SF | Q1 2:58 | 9 | 75 | 4:14 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 13:44 | 3 | 65 | 1:24 | Touchdown |
| SF | Q2 12:20 | 15 | 72 | 8:57 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 3:23 | 5 | 14 | 2:17 | Punt |
| SF | Q2 1:06 | 6 | 41 | 1:06 | End of half |
| CHI | Q3 15:00 | 10 | 65 | 5:09 | Touchdown |
| SF | Q3 9:51 | 8 | 65 | 4:59 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q3 4:52 | 10 | 80 | 4:58 | Touchdown |
| SF | Q4 14:54 | 6 | 26 | 3:31 | Punt |
| CHI | Q4 11:23 | 11 | 78 | 6:01 | Field goal |
| SF | Q4 5:22 | 7 | 75 | 3:07 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q4 2:15 | 15 | 63 | 2:15 | End of game |
About these numbers
The Bears' interception touchdown is counted as a 49ers interception, not as a Bears possession. Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Bears vs 49ers Head-to-Head
The Bears and 49ers first met in 1950 and have played 71 times since.
- All-time series
- 37–33–149ers lead, 71 meetings since 1950
- Postseason
- 3–049ers won in 1984, 1988, and 1994
- Largest Bears win
- 61–201965
- Largest 49ers win
- 49–72003
Since 2021
3–1 49ers lead
4 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
Oldest to newest. 4 = 49ers win, B = Bears win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wk 17 Bears at 49ers SF 42 CHI 38 SF W
- 2024 Wk 14 Bears at 49ers, 2024 Wk 14 recap SF 38 CHI 13 SF W
- 2022 Wk 1 49ers at Bears, 2022 Wk 1 recap CHI 19 SF 10 CHI W
- 2021 Wk 8 49ers at Bears, 2021 Wk 8 recap SF 33 CHI 22 SF W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2025 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Bears | Stat | 49ers |
|---|---|---|
| 11-6 | Record | 12-5 |
| 25.9 | Points per game | 25.7 |
| 369.5 | Yards per game | 351.4 |
| 5.7 | Yards per play | 5.5 |
| 24.4 | Points allowed per game | 21.8 |
| 361.8 | Yards allowed per game | 340.2 |
Bears vs 49ers Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- SF −4.549ers failed to cover by 0.5
- Total
- 51.5Over: 80 points scored (by 28.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 49ers | 28.0 | 42 | +14.0 |
| Bears | 23.5 | 38 | +14.5 |
Both offenses beat the market's expectation, and the Fantasy tab shows who cashed in.
Betting Trends
Last 3 meetings: Bears 2–1 ATS, overs 2–1.
Each team's 2025 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Chicago Bears
- Against the spread
- 4–1
- Over/under
- 2–3
- ATS as favorite
- 2–0
- ATS as underdog
- 2–1
- ATS on the road
- 2–1
San Francisco 49ers
- Against the spread
- 4–1
- Over/under
- 3–2
- ATS as favorite
- 4–1
- ATS at home
- 2–1
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Bears and 49ers in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Bear or a 49er, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Bears or 49ers player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Bears and 49ers players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Bears and 49ers defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2025 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Bears vs 49ers Game FAQ
Who won the 2025 Bears vs 49ers Week 17 game?
The San Francisco 49ers beat the Chicago Bears 42–38 in Week 17 of the 2025 season. The game was played at Levi's Stadium in Santa Clara, CA, on December 28, 2025. See the 49ers' 2025 schedule.
What was the final score of Bears vs 49ers?
The final score was 49ers 42, Bears 38. The 49ers led 28–21 at halftime, and the second half went Bears 17, 49ers 14.
What happened in the Bears vs 49ers game?
San Francisco led 28–21 at halftime and won 42–38, though Chicago took the second half 17–14. The 49ers finished with a 496–440 edge in total offense and averaged 7.3 yards per play. Brock Purdy led all players with 24 of 33 passing for 303 yards and 3 touchdowns, plus 6 carries for 28 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. The 49ers committed 1 turnover, the Bears none.
What was the game-winning score in Bears vs 49ers?
Brock Purdy's 38-yard touchdown pass to Jauan Jennings with 2:15 left in the fourth quarter gave the 49ers a 42–38 lead they never gave up. It was the final score of the game.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Bears vs 49ers?
Brock Purdy led the game with 37.9 PPR fantasy points, the QB1 of Week 17, on 24 of 33 passing for 303 yards and 3 touchdowns, plus 6 carries for 28 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. Christian McCaffrey was next with 28.1 (RB4). See Brock Purdy's 2025 game log.
Who led Bears vs 49ers in passing, rushing and receiving?
Caleb Williams (CHI) led all passers with 25 of 42 for 330 yards and 2 touchdowns. Christian McCaffrey (SF) led in rushing with 23 carries for 140 yards and a touchdown. Luther Burden (CHI) led in receiving with 8 catches for 138 yards and a touchdown.
How many fantasy points did Brock Purdy score against the Bears?
Brock Purdy scored 37.9 fantasy points against the Bears in Week 17 of the 2025 season, the same in PPR, half-PPR and standard scoring because he had no catches, on 24 of 33 passing for 303 yards and 3 touchdowns, plus 6 carries for 28 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Bears vs 49ers?
Brock Purdy outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 37.9 PPR points on 18.5 xFP (+19.4). DJ Moore fell furthest short, with 1.7 points on 6.8 xFP (−5.1). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
How did the 49ers come back to beat the Bears?
The 49ers' chances of winning fell as low as 14% in the fourth quarter. Brock Purdy's 38-yard touchdown pass to Jauan Jennings in the fourth quarter was the biggest swing of the game. Brock Purdy's 38-yard touchdown pass to Jauan Jennings then put them ahead for good.
What is the all-time Bears vs 49ers record?
The 49ers lead the all-time series 37–33–1 across 71 meetings since 1950, including a 3–0 record in the postseason.
When did the Bears and 49ers last play before this game?
Before Week 17 of 2025, they last met in the 2024 season on December 8, 2024, when the 49ers beat the Bears 38–13.
Have the Bears and 49ers met in the playoffs?
Yes, 3 times, most recently in the 1994 playoffs. The Bears are 0–3 against the 49ers in the postseason.
What was the closing spread for Bears vs 49ers?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was 49ers −4.5, making the San Francisco 49ers 4.5-point favorites, with a closing total of 51.5. That implied about 28.0 points for the 49ers and 23.5 for the Bears.
Did Bears vs 49ers go over or under the total?
The game went over. The consensus closing total was 51.5, and the teams combined for 80 points, 28.5 over the number.
Who covered the spread in Bears vs 49ers?
The Bears covered as 4.5-point underdogs against the closing line of 49ers −4.5. The final margin was 4 points.