Final2023 Week 2
Raymond James Stadium, Tampa, FL|
Chicago Bears vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Week 2 2023
Chicago Bears
Away
17
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
HomeWon
27
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bears | 7 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 17 |
| Buccaneers | 3 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 27 |
CHI 17 · TB 27 Final
Passing leader
TB · QB
18.4PPR pts
26/34, 317 YDS, 1 TD
Top fantasy scorer
TB · WR
29.1PPR pts
6 REC, 171 YDS, 1 TD
Bears leader
CHI · QB
16.7PPR pts
16/29, 211 YDS, 1 TD, 2 INT, 1 RUSH TD
Defensive playmaker
Shaquil Barrett
TB
1 INT, 1 TD, 1 SACK, 2 TKL
Buccaneers 27, Bears 17: Tampa Bay beats Chicago
Tampa Bay led 13–10 at halftime and outscored Chicago 14–7 after the break to win 27–17. The Buccaneers finished with a 437–236 edge in total offense and averaged 6.4 yards per play.
The gap showed up everywhere. The Bears went 6-for-13 on third down and committed two turnovers, while the Buccaneers kept the ball for 35:56 and finished without a giveaway.
The two teams meet again in Week 9 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +1.8 yards/play TB 6.4 · CHI 4.6
- +2 turnover margin TB 0 turnovers
- +201 total yards TB 437 · CHI 236
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Bear or Buccaneer on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Buccaneers Won
Tampa Bay won the efficiency, turnover, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Bears | Stat | Buccaneers |
|---|---|---|
| 4.6 | Yards per play | 6.4 |
| 2 | Turnovers | 0 |
| 236 | Total yards | 437 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 51 | Plays | 68 |
| 46% | Third-down conversion | 53% |
| 24:04 | Time of possession | 35:56 |
Scoring Summary
The Buccaneers scored three touchdowns and two field goals; the Bears scored two touchdowns and one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | CHI | TB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 9:03 | TB | Chase McLaughlin 26-yard FG Takes lead | 0 | 3 |
| 6:17 | CHI | Justin Fields 1-yard TD run Takes leadCairo Santos XP | 7 | 3 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 10:53 | TB | Rachaad White 4-yard TD run Takes leadChase McLaughlin XP | 7 | 10 |
| 1:55 | CHI | Cairo Santos 52-yard FG Ties game | 10 | 10 |
| 0:00 | TB | Chase McLaughlin 25-yard FG Takes lead | 10 | 13 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 4:06 | TB | Baker Mayfield → Mike Evans, 32-yard TD Extends leadChase McLaughlin XP | 10 | 20 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 6:17 | CHI | Justin Fields → Chase Claypool, 20-yard TDCairo Santos XP | 17 | 20 |
| 2:03 | TB | Shaquil Barrett 4-yard interception return TD Extends leadChase McLaughlin XP | 17 | 27 |
Fantasy Points: Bears vs Buccaneers, Week 2 2023
Fantasy leaders
- Mike EvansTB · WR29.1 PTSWR3
- Rachaad WhiteTB · RB21.3 PTSRB8
- Baker MayfieldTB · QB18.4 PTSQB18
- Justin FieldsCHI · QB16.7 PTSQB20
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.4 | QB18 | 26/34 | 317 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 17 | 0 | 114.5 | Start/Sit → | |
| 16.7 | QB20 | 16/29 | 211 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 61.1 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29.1 | WR3 | WR | — | — | — | 8 | 6 | 171 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 21.3 | RB8 | RB | 17 | 73 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 30 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 16.4 | WR25 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 6 | 104 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 12.6 | WR41 | WR | — | — | — | 8 | 3 | 36 | 1 | ||
| 10.8 | WR51 | WR | — | — | — | 8 | 5 | 58 | 0 | ||
| 10.1 | TE12 | TE | — | — | — | 6 | 6 | 41 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.8 | TE21 | TE | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 38 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.8 | RB35 | RB | 7 | 35 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 23 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.2 | RB40 | RB | 4 | 32 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.0 | WR96 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 20 | 0 | ||
| 1.7 | WR108 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | ||
| 1.2 | RB68 | RB | 2 | 12 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 1.1 | WR121 | WR | 1 | 11 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 1.0 | TE54 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | -10 | 0 | ||
| 0.7 | RB70 | RB | 8 | 7 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| -0.3 | — | WR | 1 | -3 | 0 | — | — | — | — |
Fantasy Usage
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
DJ MooreWR48 snaps91%
Chase ClaypoolWR42 snaps79%
Cole KmetTE36 snaps68%
Khalil HerbertRB32 snaps60%
Trent TaylorWR23 snaps43%
Target Share28 targets
- Chase Claypool29%, 8 targets
- DJ Moore25%, 7 targets
- Cole Kmet21%, 6 targets
- Khalil Herbert11%, 3 targets
- Robert Tonyan7%, 2 targets
- Other7%, 2 targets
Carry Share16 carries
- Khalil Herbert44%, 7 carries
- Justin Fields25%, 4 carries
- Roschon Johnson25%, 4 carries
- Velus Jones6%, 1 carries
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Snap Share
Cade OttonTE69 snaps97%
Chris GodwinWR53 snaps75%
Rachaad WhiteRB51 snaps72%
Mike EvansWR43 snaps61%
Trey PalmerWR35 snaps49%
Target Share32 targets
- Mike Evans25%, 8 targets
- Chris Godwin25%, 8 targets
- Cade Otton19%, 6 targets
- Rachaad White16%, 5 targets
- David Wells6%, 2 targets
- Other9%, 3 targets
Carry Share34 carries
- Rachaad White50%, 17 carries
- Sean Tucker24%, 8 carries
- Baker Mayfield18%, 6 carries
- Chase Edmonds6%, 2 carries
- Deven Thompkins3%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 69 | 97% | 6 | 19% | 0 | |
| 48 | 91% | 7 | 25% | 0 | |
| 42 | 79% | 8 | 29% | 0 | |
| 53 | 75% | 8 | 25% | 0 | |
| 51 | 72% | 5 | 16% | 17 | |
| 36 | 68% | 6 | 21% | 0 | |
| 43 | 61% | 8 | 25% | 0 | |
| 32 | 60% | 3 | 11% | 7 | |
| 35 | 49% | 2 | 6% | 0 | |
| 32 | 45% | 0 | 0% | 1 | |
| 23 | 43% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 22 | 42% | 2 | 7% | 4 | |
| 18 | 34% | 2 | 7% | 0 | |
| 15 | 28% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 18 | 25% | 2 | 6% | 0 | |
| 18 | 25% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 17 | 24% | 0 | 0% | 8 | |
| 12 | 23% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 16 | 23% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 8 | 15% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 4 | 8% | 0 | 0% | 1 | |
| 3 | 4% | 0 | 0% | 2 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+15.7Mike Evans29.1 PTS vs 13.4 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−4.2Sean Tucker0.7 PTS vs 4.9 xFP
- Highest expected volume18.8 xFPRachaad White21.3 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rachaad WhiteTB · RB | 21.3 | 18.8 | +2.5 | 72% | 50% car | — | 0 | 17 | 50% | 5 | 16% |
| Baker MayfieldTB · QB | 18.4 | 18.0 | +0.4 | 100% | 34 att | — | 34 | 6 | 18% | 0 | 0% |
| Justin FieldsCHI · QB | 16.7 | 14.7 | +2.0 | 100% | 29 att | — | 29 | 4 | 25% | 0 | 0% |
| Chase ClaypoolCHI · WR | 12.6 | 13.4 | −0.8 | 79% | 29% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 29% |
| Chris Godwin Jr.TB · WR | 10.8 | 13.4 | −2.6 | 75% | 25% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 25% |
| Mike EvansTB · WR | 29.1 | 13.4 | +15.7 | 61% | 25% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 25% |
| DJ MooreCHI · WR | 16.4 | 11.7 | +4.7 | 91% | 25% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 25% |
| Cade OttonTB · TE | 10.1 | 10.0 | +0.1 | 97% | 19% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 19% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 7.8 | 10.0 | −2.2 | 68% | 21% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 21% |
| Khalil HerbertCHI · RB | 6.8 | 9.3 | −2.5 | 60% | 44% car | — | 0 | 7 | 44% | 3 | 11% |
| Roschon JohnsonCHI · RB | 6.2 | 5.8 | +0.4 | 42% | 25% car | — | 0 | 4 | 25% | 2 | 7% |
| Sean TuckerTB · RB | 0.7 | 4.9 | −4.2 | 24% | 24% car | — | 0 | 8 | 24% | 0 | 0% |
| David WellsTB · TE | 1.0 | 3.3 | −2.3 | 25% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
| Robert TonyanCHI · TE | 0.0 | 3.3 | −3.3 | 34% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Trey PalmerTB · WR | 3.0 | 3.3 | −0.3 | 49% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
| Rakim JarrettTB · WR | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 23% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Chase EdmondsTB · RB | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 4% | 6% car | — | 0 | 2 | 6% | 0 | 0% |
| Deven ThompkinsTB · WR | 1.1 | 0.6 | +0.5 | 45% | 3% car | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 0 | 0% |
| Velus Jones Jr.CHI · WR | -0.3 | 0.6 | −0.9 | 8% | 6% car | — | 0 | 1 | 6% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Bears 28 targets and 16 carries; Buccaneers 32 targets and 34 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2023 season: 1.67 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.61 per carry and 0.42 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Justin Fields
CHI · QB · 16.7 pts on 14.7 expected
16 of 29 passing for 211 yards, 1 touchdown, 2 interceptions; 4 carries for 3 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 14.7 expected.
Start/Sit: Justin Fields →Baker Mayfield
TB · QB · 18.4 pts on 18.0 expected
26 of 34 passing for 317 yards, 1 touchdown; 6 carries for 17 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 18.0 expected.
Start/Sit: Baker Mayfield →Chase Claypool
CHI · WR · 12.6 pts on 13.4 expected
8 targets (29% of the team's), 3 catches for 36 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 13.4 expected.
Trend: Season high in targets (8).
DJ Moore
CHI · WR · 16.4 pts on 11.7 expected
7 targets (25% of the team's), 6 catches for 104 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 11.7 expected.
Trend: Season high in targets (7).
Rachaad White
TB · RB · 21.3 pts on 18.8 expected
5 targets (16% of the team's), 5 catches for 30 yards; 17 carries (50% of the team's) for 73 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 18.8 expected.
Start/Sit: Rachaad White →Chris Godwin Jr.
TB · WR · 10.8 pts on 13.4 expected
8 targets (25% of the team's), 5 catches for 58 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 13.4 expected.
Trend: Season high in targets (8).
Mike Evans Ran hot
TB · WR · 29.1 pts on 13.4 expected
8 targets (25% of the team's), 6 catches for 171 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 13.4 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Start/Sit: Mike Evans →Khalil Herbert
CHI · RB · 6.8 pts on 9.3 expected
3 targets (11% of the team's), 1 catch for 23 yards; 7 carries (44% of the team's) for 35 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 9.3 expected.
Start/Sit: Khalil Herbert →Stock Up, Stock Down
Chicago Bears
- ▲Stock up: Khalil Herbert led the backfield with 60% of the snaps after trailing Roschon Johnson before this game.
- ▲Stock up: Robert Tonyan played 34% of the snaps, up from a 5% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Roschon Johnson lost the backfield lead: 42% of the snaps to Khalil Herbert's 60%.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
- ▲Stock up: Trey Palmer played 49% of the snaps, up from a 34% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Deven Thompkins played 45% of the snaps, up from a 26% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Mike Evans played 61% of the snaps, down from a 84% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2023 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Bears D | Buccaneers D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 16.9 | 17.7 |
| RBs | 23.8 | 17.6 |
| WRs | 31.9 | 35.9 |
| TEs | 13.7 | 14.8 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Tampa Bay opened at 50% win probability and passed 98% in the fourth quarter on the way to the win.
Buccaneers win probability
Key Swings
- −22Fields 1-yd TD run59% → 37%Q1 6:17
- +25White 4-yd TD run36% → 61%Q2 10:53
- −12Santos 52-yd FG62% → 50%Q2 1:55
- +25Mayfield → Evans, 32-yd TD65% → 91%Q3 4:06
- −24Fields → Claypool, 20-yd TD99% → 75%Q4 6:17
Swing in Buccaneers win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Chicago Bears | Measure | Tampa Bay Buccaneers |
|---|---|---|
| 51 | Plays | 68 |
| 69% | Pass rate | 50% |
| 4.8 | Yds / dropback | 9.3 |
| 4.2 | Yds / carry | 3.5 |
| 6/13 | Third downs | 8/15 |
Efficiency edge Tampa Bay ran 17 more plays and gained 4.5 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- CHI Claypool 29% · Moore 25% · Kmet 21%
- TB Godwin 25% · Evans 25% · Otton 19%
Possession Results
| Result | CHI | TB |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 2 | 2 |
| Field goals | 1 | 2 |
| Punts | 5 | 4 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 0 |
| Missed field goals | 0 | 1 |
TB turnover edge: +2
- The Buccaneers opened the scoring on their first possession, a 12-play, 67-yard drive that ended in a field goal.
All 20 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TB | Q1 15:00 | 12 | 67 | 5:57 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q1 9:03 | 6 | 75 | 2:46 | Touchdown |
| TB | Q1 6:17 | 11 | 53 | 6:28 | Missed FG |
| CHI | Q2 14:49 | 3 | -14 | 1:34 | Punt |
| TB | Q2 13:15 | 4 | 77 | 2:22 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 10:53 | 3 | 2 | 1:34 | Punt |
| TB | Q2 9:19 | 3 | 9 | 2:30 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 6:49 | 10 | 46 | 4:54 | Field goal |
| TB | Q2 1:55 | 12 | 69 | 1:55 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q3 15:00 | 6 | 7 | 3:29 | Punt |
| TB | Q3 11:31 | 12 | 89 | 7:25 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q3 4:06 | 9 | 21 | 3:34 | Punt |
| TB | Q3 0:32 | 3 | 9 | 1:58 | Punt |
| CHI | Q4 13:34 | 3 | 0 | 1:03 | Punt |
| TB | Q4 12:31 | 4 | 7 | 2:21 | Punt |
| CHI | Q4 10:10 | 8 | 90 | 3:53 | Touchdown |
| TB | Q4 6:17 | 8 | 32 | 3:53 | Punt |
| CHI | Q4 2:24 | 1 | -1 | 0:21 | Interception |
| CHI | Q4 2:03 | 3 | -9 | 0:56 | Interception |
| TB | Q4 1:07 | 2 | -2 | 1:07 | End of game |
About these numbers
The Buccaneers' interception touchdown is counted as a Bears interception, not as a Buccaneers possession. Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Bears vs Buccaneers Head-to-Head
The Bears and Buccaneers first met in 1977 and have played 62 times since.
- All-time series
- 40–22Bears lead, 62 meetings since 1977
- Postseason
- 0No playoff meetings
- Largest Bears win
- 48–102018
- Largest Buccaneers win
- 41–02000
Since 2021
2–0 Buccaneers lead
2 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- TB
- TB
Oldest to newest. TB = Buccaneers win, CHI = Bears win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 9 Buccaneers at Bears Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2023 Wk 2 Bears at Buccaneers TB 27 CHI 17 TB W
- 2021 Wk 7 Bears at Buccaneers, 2021 Wk 7 recap TB 38 CHI 3 TB W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2023 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Bears | Stat | Buccaneers |
|---|---|---|
| 7-10 | Record | 9-8 |
| 21.2 | Points per game | 20.5 |
| 323.2 | Yards per game | 313.0 |
| 5.0 | Yards per play | 5.1 |
| 22.3 | Points allowed per game | 19.1 |
| 324.2 | Yards allowed per game | 344.2 |
Bears vs Buccaneers Fantasy Outlook for 2026
One meeting is left on the 2026 schedule: Week 9 in Chicago. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Bears or Buccaneers player start in Week 9? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Bears and Buccaneers players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Bears and Buccaneers defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere this matchup falls in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2023 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Bears vs Buccaneers Game FAQ
Who won the 2023 Bears vs Buccaneers Week 2 game?
The Tampa Bay Buccaneers beat the Chicago Bears 27–17 in Week 2 of the 2023 season. The game was played at Raymond James Stadium in Tampa, FL, on September 17, 2023. See the Buccaneers' 2023 schedule.
What was the final score of Bears vs Buccaneers?
The final score was Buccaneers 27, Bears 17. The Buccaneers led 13–10 at halftime, and the second half went Bears 7, Buccaneers 14.
What happened in the Bears vs Buccaneers game?
Tampa Bay led 13–10 at halftime and outscored Chicago 14–7 after the break to win 27–17. The Buccaneers finished with a 437–236 edge in total offense and averaged 6.4 yards per play. Mike Evans led all players with 6 catches for 171 yards and a touchdown. The Bears committed 2 turnovers, the Buccaneers none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Bears vs Buccaneers?
Mike Evans led the game with 29.1 PPR fantasy points, the WR3 of Week 2, on 6 catches for 171 yards and a touchdown. Rachaad White was next with 21.3 (RB8). See Mike Evans's 2023 game log.
Who led Bears vs Buccaneers in passing, rushing and receiving?
Baker Mayfield (TB) led all passers with 26 of 34 for 317 yards and a touchdown. Rachaad White (TB) led in rushing with 17 carries for 73 yards and a touchdown. Mike Evans (TB) led in receiving with 6 catches for 171 yards and a touchdown.
How many fantasy points did Mike Evans score against the Bears?
Mike Evans scored 29.1 points in PPR leagues, 26.1 in half-PPR and 23.1 in standard scoring against the Bears in Week 2 of the 2023 season, on 6 catches for 171 yards and a touchdown. He drew 25% of his team's targets.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Bears vs Buccaneers?
Mike Evans outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 29.1 PPR points on 13.4 xFP (+15.7). Sean Tucker fell furthest short, with 0.7 points on 4.9 xFP (−4.2). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Bears vs Buccaneers?
Rachaad White had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 18.8 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 21.3. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Buccaneers beat the Bears?
The Buccaneers beat the Bears 27–17 because they averaged 6.4 yards per play to 4.6, won the turnover battle 2–0, and outgained them 437–236.
Which team won the turnover battle in Bears vs Buccaneers?
The Buccaneers won the turnover battle 2–0: the Bears gave the ball away 2 times and the Buccaneers not at all. The Buccaneers won the game.
What was the turning point of Bears vs Buccaneers?
Baker Mayfield's 32-yard touchdown pass to Mike Evans with 4:06 left in the third quarter was the biggest swing of the game, moving the Buccaneers' win probability from 65% to 91%.
What is the all-time Bears vs Buccaneers record?
The Bears lead the all-time series 40–22 across 62 meetings since 1977.
When did the Bears and Buccaneers last play before this game?
Before Week 2 of 2023, they last met in the 2021 season on October 24, 2021, when the Buccaneers beat the Bears 38–3.
What is the Bears vs Buccaneers record since 2021?
The Buccaneers lead 2–0 across 2 meetings since the 2021 season, including this game.
