Final2025 Week 6

Northwest Stadium, Landover, MD

Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders, Week 6 2025

Chicago Bears

AwayWon

25

Washington Commanders

Home

24

Scoring by quarter
TeamQ1Q2Q3Q4Final
Bears673925
Commanders0710724

CHI 25WAS 24 Final

  • Passing leader

    Caleb Williams

    CHI · QB

    20.4PPR pts

    17/29, 252 YDS, 1 TD, 1 RUSH TD

  • Top fantasy scorer

    D'Andre Swift

    CHI · RB

    25.5PPR pts

    14 ATT, 108 YDS, 2 REC, 67 REC YDS, 1 REC TD

  • Commanders leader

    Jayden Daniels

    WAS · QB

    22.6PPR pts

    19/26, 211 YDS, 3 TD, 1 INT

  • Defensive playmaker

    Jaquan Brisker

    CHI

    1 INT, 3 TKL

Bears 25, Commanders 24: Chicago rallies in the fourth quarter

Chicago led 13–7 at halftime and won 25–24, though Washington took the second half 17–12. The Bears finished with a 386–329 edge in total offense and averaged 6.5 yards per play.

The Commanders went 3-for-8 on third down and committed three turnovers, while the Bears finished without a giveaway.

Key advantages

  • +1.0 yards/play CHI 6.5 · WAS 5.5
  • +3 turnover margin CHI 0 turnovers
  • +57 total yards CHI 386 · WAS 329

Game Highlights

Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube

Got a Bear or Commander on your fantasy team?

Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.

Connect your league

Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.

Why the Bears Won

Chicago won the efficiency and turnover battles.

Team stats comparison, Bears vs Commanders
BearsStatCommanders
6.5Yards per play5.5
0Turnovers3
386Total yards329
Other team stats
59Plays60
30%Third-down conversion38%
28:26Time of possession31:34

Scoring Summary

The Bears scored two touchdowns and four field goals; the Commanders scored three touchdowns and one field goal.

Scoring plays, Bears vs Commanders
TimeTeamPlayCHIWAS
1st quarter
10:41CHIJake Moody 47-yard FG Takes lead30
2:27CHIJake Moody 48-yard FG Extends lead60
2nd quarter
14:18CHICaleb Williams 1-yard TD run Extends leadJake Moody XP130
9:28WASJayden Daniels → Chris Moore, 22-yard TDMatt Gay XP137
3rd quarter
11:59WASMatt Gay 53-yard FG1310
8:05CHIJake Moody 41-yard FG Extends lead1610
2:56WASJayden Daniels → Luke McCaffrey, 33-yard TD Takes leadMatt Gay XP1617
4th quarter
11:27WASJayden Daniels → Zach Ertz, 6-yard TD Extends leadMatt Gay XP1624
10:26CHICaleb Williams → D'Andre Swift, 55-yard TD2-pt try failed2224
0:00CHIJake Moody 38-yard FG Game winner2524

Fantasy Points: Bears vs Commanders, Week 6 2025

Fantasy leaders

  1. D'Andre SwiftCHIRB25.5 PTSRB6
  2. Jayden DanielsWASQB22.6 PTSQB5
  3. Caleb WilliamsCHIQB19.9 PTSQB10
  4. Zach ErtzWASTE16.3 PTSTE5

Player Stats

Quarterbacks

Quarterback statistics
PlayerFPTSFINCMP/ATTPass YDSTDINTRush ATTRush YDSRush TDRateStart/Sit
Caleb WilliamsCHIQB19.9QB1017/29252104-2198.6Start/Sit →
Jayden DanielsWASQB22.6QB519/262113110520119.2Start/Sit →

WRs, RBs, & TEs

Receiver, running back and tight end statistics
PlayerFPTSFINPOSRush ATTRush YDSRush TDTGTRECRec YDSRec TDStart/Sit
D'Andre SwiftCHIRB25.5RB6RB14108032671Start/Sit →
Zach ErtzWASTE16.3TE5TE———66431
Chris MooreWASWR13.6WR21WR———53461Start/Sit →
Luke McCaffreyWASWR10.3WR31WR———11331Start/Sit →
Luther BurdenCHIWR9.1WR36WR———44510
DJ MooreCHIWR8.2WR41WR210053420Start/Sit →
Jeremy McNicholsWASRB6.5RB34RB25043300
Jacory Croskey-MerrittWASRB5.8RB38RB176101170Start/Sit →
Kyle MonangaiCHIRB5.4RB39RB519011250Start/Sit →
Jaylin LaneWASWR5.4WR61WR17021370Start/Sit →
Deebo SamuelWASWR5.4WR60WR1-1054150
Rome OdunzeCHIWR5.2WR63WR———52320Start/Sit →
Olamide ZaccheausCHIWR4.8WR67WR14062240Start/Sit →
Colston LovelandCHITE3.1TE40TE———32110Start/Sit →
Cole KmetCHITE1.0TE56TE———2100Start/Sit →
Roschon JohnsonCHIRB0.6RB66RB160————Start/Sit →

Fantasy Usage

Chicago Bears

Snap Share

  1. Rome OdunzeWR62 snaps97%
  2. DJ MooreWR60 snaps94%
  3. Olamide ZaccheausWR54 snaps84%
  4. D'Andre SwiftRB36 snaps56%
  5. Cole KmetTE33 snaps52%

Target Share29 targets

  1. Olamide Zaccheaus21%, 6 targets
  2. DJ Moore17%, 5 targets
  3. Rome Odunze17%, 5 targets
  4. Luther Burden14%, 4 targets
  5. D'Andre Swift10%, 3 targets
  6. Other21%, 6 targets

Carry Share27 carries

  1. D'Andre Swift52%, 14 carries
  2. Kyle Monangai19%, 5 carries
  3. Caleb Williams15%, 4 carries
  4. DJ Moore7%, 2 carries
  5. Olamide Zaccheaus4%, 1 carries
  6. Other4%, 1 carries

Washington Commanders

Snap Share

  1. Deebo SamuelWR47 snaps72%
  2. Chris MooreWR44 snaps68%
  3. Jacory Croskey-MerrittRB43 snaps66%
  4. Zach ErtzTE39 snaps60%
  5. John BatesTE30 snaps46%

Target Share24 targets

  1. Zach Ertz25%, 6 targets
  2. Chris Moore21%, 5 targets
  3. Deebo Samuel21%, 5 targets
  4. Jeremy McNichols17%, 4 targets
  5. Jaylin Lane8%, 2 targets
  6. Other8%, 2 targets

Carry Share31 carries

  1. Jacory Croskey-Merritt55%, 17 carries
  2. Jayden Daniels32%, 10 carries
  3. Jeremy McNichols6%, 2 carries
  4. Deebo Samuel3%, 1 carries
  5. Jaylin Lane3%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
Offensive snaps and share for the skill positions
PlayerSNAPSSNAP %TGTTGT %CAR
Rome OdunzeCHIWR6297%517%0
DJ MooreCHIWR6094%517%2
Olamide ZaccheausCHIWR5484%621%1
Deebo SamuelWASWR4772%521%1
Chris MooreWASWR4468%521%0
Jacory Croskey-MerrittWASRB4366%14%17
Zach ErtzWASTE3960%625%0
D'Andre SwiftCHIRB3656%310%14
Cole KmetCHITE3352%27%0
John BatesWASTE3046%00%0
Colston LovelandCHITE2742%310%0
Jaylin LaneWASWR2742%28%1
Luke McCaffreyWASWR2538%14%0
Kyle MonangaiCHIRB2234%13%5
Jeremy McNicholsWASRB2132%417%2
Ben SinnottWASTE1726%00%0
Luther BurdenCHIWR1523%414%0
Durham SmytheCHITE813%00%0
Tay MartinWASWR711%00%0
Ja'Corey BrooksWASWR711%00%0
Roschon JohnsonCHIRB35%00%1
Colson YankoffWASTE35%00%0
Chris RodriguezWASRB12%00%0

Fantasy Points vs Expected

Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.

Usage and expected fantasy points
PlayerPTSxFPvs xFPSnap%UsageRte%Pass attCarCar%TgtTgt%
Jayden DanielsWAS · QB22.618.0+4.6100%26 att—261032%00%
Caleb WilliamsCHI · QB20.415.5+4.9100%29 att—29415%00%
D'Andre SwiftCHI · RB25.514.2+11.356%52% car—01452%310%
Jacory Croskey-MerrittWAS · RB5.812.7−6.966%55% car—01755%14%
Olamide ZaccheausCHI · WR4.810.9−6.184%21% tgt—014%621%
Zach ErtzWAS · TE16.310.2+6.160%25% tgt—000%625%
DJ MooreCHI · WR8.29.8−1.694%17% tgt—027%517%
Deebo Samuel Sr.WAS · WR5.49.2−3.872%21% tgt—013%521%
Chris MooreWAS · WR13.68.5+5.168%21% tgt—000%521%
Rome OdunzeCHI · WR5.28.5−3.397%17% tgt—000%517%
Jeremy McNicholsWAS · RB6.58.1−1.632%17% tgt—026%417%
Luther Burden IIICHI · WR9.16.8+2.323%14% tgt—000%414%
Colston LovelandCHI · TE3.15.1−2.042%10% tgt—000%310%
Kyle MonangaiCHI · RB5.44.9+0.534%19% car—0519%13%
Jaylin LaneWAS · WR5.44.1+1.342%8% tgt—013%28%
Cole KmetCHI · TE1.03.4−2.452%7% tgt—000%27%
Luke McCaffreyWAS · WR10.31.7+8.638%4% tgt—000%14%
Roschon JohnsonCHI · RB0.60.60.05%4% car—014%00%

Team totals: Bears 29 targets and 27 carries; Commanders 24 targets and 31 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2025 season: 1.70 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.65 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.

Fantasy Verdicts

Caleb Williams

CHI · QB · 20.4 pts on 15.5 expected

17 of 29 passing for 252 yards, 1 touchdown; 4 carries for 3 yards and 1 touchdown.

Verdict: The points matched the role, 15.5 expected.

Start/Sit: Caleb Williams →

Jayden Daniels

WAS · QB · 22.6 pts on 18.0 expected

19 of 26 passing for 211 yards, 3 touchdowns, 1 interception; 10 carries for 52 yards.

Verdict: The points matched the role, 18.0 expected.

Start/Sit: Jayden Daniels →

D'Andre Swift Ran hot

CHI · RB · 25.5 pts on 14.2 expected

3 targets (10% of the team's), 2 catches for 67 yards and 1 touchdown; 14 carries (52% of the team's) for 108 yards.

Verdict: The opportunities were worth 14.2 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.

Start/Sit: D'Andre Swift →

Olamide Zaccheaus Unlucky

CHI · WR · 4.8 pts on 10.9 expected

6 targets (21% of the team's), 2 catches for 24 yards; 1 carry (4% of the team's) for 4 yards.

Verdict: The role was there, worth 10.9 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.

Start/Sit: Olamide Zaccheaus →

Jacory Croskey-Merritt Unlucky

WAS · RB · 5.8 pts on 12.7 expected

1 target (4% of the team's), 1 catch for 7 yards; 17 carries (55% of the team's) for 61 yards.

Verdict: The role was there, worth 12.7 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.

Start/Sit: Jacory Croskey-Merritt →

Zach Ertz Ran hot

WAS · TE · 16.3 pts on 10.2 expected

6 targets (25% of the team's), 6 catches for 43 yards and 1 touchdown.

Verdict: The opportunities were worth 10.2 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.

Chris Moore Ran hot

WAS · WR · 13.6 pts on 8.5 expected

5 targets (21% of the team's), 3 catches for 46 yards and 1 touchdown.

Verdict: The opportunities were worth 8.5 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.

Start/Sit: Chris Moore →

Luke McCaffrey Ran hot

WAS · WR · 10.3 pts on 1.7 expected

1 target (4% of the team's), 1 catch for 33 yards and 1 touchdown.

Verdict: The opportunities were worth 1.7 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.

Start/Sit: Luke McCaffrey →

Stock Up, Stock Down

Chicago Bears

  • Stock up: Olamide Zaccheaus played 84% of the snaps, up from a 52% season average.
  • Stock down: Cole Kmet played 52% of the snaps, down from a 93% season average.

Washington Commanders

Fantasy Matchups

Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2025 through Week 18.

Fantasy points allowed per game by position, Bears defense and Commanders defense
Points allowed toBears DCommanders D
QBs19.119.9
RBs21.724.8
WRs35.534.9
TEs13.115.8

Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.

How the Game Swung

Washington opened at 50% win probability, climbed as high as >99%, then lost.

Commanders win probability

Commanders win probability by game minuteCommanders started at 50%, stood at 27% at halftime and finished at 0%, across 10 scoring plays.Q1Q2Q3Q4100%50%0%

Key Swings

  1. −17Williams 1-yd TD run30% → 13%Q2 14:18
  2. +35Daniels → McCaffrey, 33-yd TD21% → 55%Q3 2:56
  3. +35Daniels → Ertz, 6-yd TD57% → 91%Q4 11:27
  4. −28Williams → Swift, 55-yd TD92% → 64%Q4 10:26
  5. −100Moody 38-yd FG>99% → <1%Q4 0:00

Swing in Commanders win probability, in points

Play Calling and Possessions

Play calling, Bears vs Commanders
Chicago BearsMeasureWashington Commanders
59Plays60
54%Pass rate48%
7.4Yds / dropback7.1
5.6Yds / carry4.0
3/10Third downs3/8

Efficiency edge Chicago ran 1 fewer plays but gained 1.6 more yards per carry.

  • Top targets
  • CHI Zaccheaus 21% · Moore 17% · Odunze 17%
  • WAS Ertz 25% · Moore 21% · Samuel 21%

Possession Results

How each possession ended, Bears vs Commanders
ResultCHIWAS
Touchdowns23
Field goals41
Punts21
Turnovers03
Turnovers on downs10
Missed field goals11

CHI turnover edge: +3

  • The Bears opened the scoring on their first possession, a 9-play, 41-yard drive that ended in a field goal.
All 20 possessions, drive by drive
Drive chart
TeamStartPlaysYardsTimeResult
CHIQ1 15:009414:19Field goal
WASQ1 10:418444:35Interception
CHIQ1 6:068363:39Field goal
WASQ1 2:27150:28Fumble
CHIQ1 1:595352:41Touchdown
WASQ2 14:188654:50Touchdown
CHIQ2 9:289433:58Downs
WASQ2 5:3010374:20Missed FG
CHIQ2 1:103-20:51Punt
WASQ2 0:191-10:19End of half
WASQ3 15:008253:01Field goal
CHIQ3 11:598623:54Field goal
WASQ3 8:059845:09Touchdown
CHIQ3 2:567473:01Missed FG
WASQ4 14:556633:28Touchdown
CHIQ4 11:273611:01Touchdown
WASQ4 10:265212:29Punt
CHIQ4 7:57381:55Punt
WASQ4 6:026172:55Fumble
CHIQ4 3:079363:07Field goal
About these numbers

Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.

Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.

Bears vs Commanders Head-to-Head

The Bears and Commanders first met in 1932 and have played 55 times since.

All-time series
28–26–1Commanders lead, 55 meetings since 1932
Postseason
4–3Split 4–3
Largest Bears win
73–01940
Largest Commanders win
42–01974

Since 2021

2–2 Series tied

4 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.

Oldest to newest. B = Bears win, C = Commanders win, outlined = this game.

Recent Meetings

Season to Date (Through Week 18)

The 2025 regular season, from each game's box score.

Season to date, Bears vs Commanders
BearsStatCommanders
11-6Record5-12
25.9Points per game20.9
369.5Yards per game318.8
5.7Yards per play5.5
24.4Points allowed per game26.5
361.8Yards allowed per game384.3

Bears and Commanders in Fantasy

The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Bear or a Commander, these answer the week-to-week question.

Keep Exploring

2025 Game Logs for Players in This Game

Bears vs Commanders Game FAQ

Who won the 2025 Bears vs Commanders Week 6 game?

The Chicago Bears beat the Washington Commanders 25–24 in Week 6 of the 2025 season. The game was played at Northwest Stadium in Landover, MD, on October 13, 2025. See the Bears' 2025 schedule.

What was the final score of Bears vs Commanders?

The final score was Bears 25, Commanders 24. The Bears led 13–7 at halftime, and the second half went Bears 12, Commanders 17.

What happened in the Bears vs Commanders game?

Chicago led 13–7 at halftime and won 25–24, though Washington took the second half 17–12. The Bears finished with a 386–329 edge in total offense and averaged 6.5 yards per play. D'Andre Swift led all players with 2 catches for 67 yards and a touchdown, plus 14 carries for 108 rushing yards. The Commanders committed 3 turnovers, the Bears none.

What was the game-winning score in Bears vs Commanders?

Jake Moody's 38-yard field goal with 0:00 left in the fourth quarter gave the Bears a 25–24 lead they never gave up. It was the final score of the game.

Who scored the most fantasy points in Bears vs Commanders?

D'Andre Swift led the game with 25.5 PPR fantasy points, the RB6 of Week 6, on 2 catches for 67 yards and a touchdown, plus 14 carries for 108 rushing yards. Jayden Daniels was next with 22.6 (QB5). See D'Andre Swift's 2025 game log.

Who led Bears vs Commanders in passing, rushing and receiving?

Caleb Williams (CHI) led all passers with 17 of 29 for 252 yards and a touchdown. D'Andre Swift (CHI) led in rushing with 14 carries for 108 yards. D'Andre Swift (CHI) led in receiving with 2 catches for 67 yards and a touchdown.

How many fantasy points did D'Andre Swift score against the Commanders?

D'Andre Swift scored 25.5 points in PPR leagues, 24.5 in half-PPR and 23.5 in standard scoring against the Commanders in Week 6 of the 2025 season, on 2 catches for 67 yards and a touchdown, plus 14 carries for 108 rushing yards. He handled 52% of his team's carries.

Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Bears vs Commanders?

D'Andre Swift outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 25.5 PPR points on 14.2 xFP (+11.3). Jacory Croskey-Merritt fell furthest short, with 5.8 points on 12.7 xFP (−6.9). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.

Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Bears vs Commanders?

Jayden Daniels had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 18.0 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 22.6. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.

How did the Bears come back to beat the Commanders?

The Bears' chances of winning fell as low as <1% in overtime. Jake Moody's 38-yard field goal in the fourth quarter was the biggest swing of the game. Jake Moody's 38-yard field goal then put them ahead for good.

Which team won the turnover battle in Bears vs Commanders?

The Bears won the turnover battle 3–0: the Commanders gave the ball away 3 times and the Bears not at all. The Bears won the game.

What was the turning point of Bears vs Commanders?

Jake Moody's 38-yard field goal with 0:00 left in the fourth quarter was the biggest swing of the game, moving the Commanders' win probability from >99% to <1%.

What is the all-time Bears vs Commanders record?

The Commanders lead the all-time series 28–26–1 across 55 meetings since 1932, including a 4–3 record in the postseason.

When did the Bears and Commanders last play before this game?

Before Week 6 of 2025, they last met in the 2024 season on October 27, 2024, when the Commanders beat the Bears 18–15.

Have the Bears and Commanders met in the playoffs?

Yes, 7 times, most recently in the 1987 playoffs. The Bears are 3–4 against the Commanders in the postseason.