Final2024 Week 8
Northwest Stadium, Landover, MD|
Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders, Week 8 2024
Chicago Bears
Away
15
Washington Commanders
HomeWon
18
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bears | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 | 15 |
| Commanders | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 18 |
CHI 15 · WAS 18 Final
Passing leader
WAS · QB
22.2PPR pts
21/38, 326 YDS, 1 TD
Top fantasy scorer
CHI · RB
18.9PPR pts
18 ATT, 129 YDS, 1 TD
Bears leader
CHI · QB
9.9PPR pts
10/24, 131 YDS
Defensive playmaker
T.J. Edwards
CHI
1 SACK, 6 TKL
Commanders 18, Bears 15: Washington holds off Chicago
Washington led 9–0 at halftime and won 18–15, though Chicago took the second half 15–9. The Commanders finished with a 481–307 edge in total offense and averaged 6.7 yards per play.
Chicago didn't get on the board until the third quarter.
The gap showed up everywhere. The Bears went 2-for-12 on third down and committed one turnover, while the Commanders kept the ball for 32:16 and finished without a giveaway.
Key advantages
- +1.6 yards/play WAS 6.7 · CHI 5.1
- +1 turnover margin WAS 0 turnovers
- +174 total yards WAS 481 · CHI 307
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Bear or Commander on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Commanders Won
Washington won the efficiency, turnover, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Bears | Stat | Commanders |
|---|---|---|
| 5.1 | Yards per play | 6.7 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 0 |
| 307 | Total yards | 481 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 60 | Plays | 72 |
| 17% | Third-down conversion | 33% |
| 27:44 | Time of possession | 32:16 |
Scoring Summary
The Commanders scored one touchdown and four field goals; the Bears scored two touchdowns.
| Time | Team | Play | CHI | WAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 8:51 | WAS | Austin Seibert 27-yard FG Takes lead | 0 | 3 |
| 1:04 | WAS | Austin Seibert 30-yard FG Extends lead | 0 | 6 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 5:24 | WAS | Austin Seibert 28-yard FG Extends lead | 0 | 9 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 5:48 | WAS | Austin Seibert 47-yard FG Extends lead | 0 | 12 |
| 0:43 | CHI | D'Andre Swift 56-yard TD runCairo Santos XP | 7 | 12 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 0:25 | CHI | Roschon Johnson 1-yard TD run Takes leadCaleb Williams → Cole Kmet, 2-pt conversion | 15 | 12 |
| 0:00 | WAS | Jayden Daniels → Noah Brown, 52-yard TD Game winner | 15 | 18 |
Fantasy Points: Bears vs Commanders, Week 8 2024
Fantasy leaders
- Jayden DanielsWAS · QB22.2 PTSQB11
- D'Andre SwiftCHI · RB18.9 PTSRB11
- Terry McLaurinWAS · WR17.5 PTSWR19
- Noah BrownWAS · WR16.3 PTSWR23
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.2 | QB11 | 21/38 | 326 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 52 | 0 | 92.7 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.9 | QB28 | 10/24 | 131 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 47 | 0 | 59.5 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.9 | RB11 | RB | 18 | 129 | 1 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 17.5 | WR19 | WR | — | — | — | 8 | 5 | 125 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 16.3 | WR23 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 3 | 73 | 1 | ||
| 14.7 | TE10 | TE | — | — | — | 11 | 7 | 77 | 0 | ||
| 8.6 | RB37 | RB | 16 | 65 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | ||
| 8.4 | WR53 | WR | 2 | 13 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 41 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.8 | RB41 | RB | 7 | 52 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.6 | RB42 | RB | 2 | 6 | 1 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.9 | WR66 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 2 | 39 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.4 | WR71 | WR | 2 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 27 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.4 | TE38 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.0 | TE48 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 20 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.8 | WR104 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 8 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.7 | WR105 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | ||
| 1.6 | WR107 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.3 | TE60 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| -0.1 | — | RB | 1 | -1 | 0 | — | — | — | — |
Fantasy Usage
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Keenan AllenWR61 snaps97%
DJ MooreWR60 snaps95%
Cole KmetTE49 snaps78%
Rome OdunzeWR47 snaps75%
D'Andre SwiftRB46 snaps73%
Target Share22 targets
- Keenan Allen32%, 7 targets
- Rome Odunze27%, 6 targets
- DJ Moore18%, 4 targets
- Gerald Everett9%, 2 targets
- Marcedes Lewis5%, 1 targets
- Other9%, 2 targets
Carry Share33 carries
- D'Andre Swift55%, 18 carries
- Caleb Williams27%, 9 carries
- DJ Moore6%, 2 carries
- Roschon Johnson6%, 2 carries
- Rome Odunze6%, 2 carries
Washington Commanders
Snap Share
Noah BrownWR60 snaps81%
Zach ErtzTE56 snaps76%
Terry McLaurinWR53 snaps72%
Austin EkelerRB42 snaps57%
Brian RobinsonRB35 snaps47%
Target Share34 targets
- Zach Ertz32%, 11 targets
- Terry McLaurin24%, 8 targets
- Noah Brown18%, 6 targets
- Austin Ekeler9%, 3 targets
- John Bates6%, 2 targets
- Other12%, 4 targets
Carry Share32 carries
- Brian Robinson50%, 16 carries
- Jayden Daniels25%, 8 carries
- Austin Ekeler22%, 7 carries
- Jeremy McNichols3%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 61 | 97% | 7 | 32% | 0 | |
| 60 | 95% | 4 | 18% | 2 | |
| 60 | 81% | 6 | 18% | 0 | |
| 49 | 78% | 1 | 5% | 0 | |
| 56 | 76% | 11 | 32% | 0 | |
| 47 | 75% | 6 | 27% | 2 | |
| 46 | 73% | 0 | 0% | 18 | |
| 53 | 72% | 8 | 24% | 0 | |
| 42 | 57% | 3 | 9% | 7 | |
| 35 | 47% | 1 | 3% | 16 | |
| 26 | 35% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 25 | 34% | 2 | 6% | 0 | |
| 25 | 34% | 2 | 6% | 0 | |
| 21 | 33% | 2 | 9% | 0 | |
| 24 | 32% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 17 | 27% | 0 | 0% | 2 | |
| 16 | 22% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 10 | 16% | 1 | 5% | 0 | |
| 5 | 7% | 0 | 0% | 1 | |
| 3 | 5% | 1 | 5% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+7.2D'Andre Swift18.9 PTS vs 11.7 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−6.6Caleb Williams9.9 PTS vs 16.5 xFP
- Highest expected volume22.1 xFPJayden Daniels22.2 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jayden DanielsWAS · QB | 22.2 | 22.1 | +0.1 | 100% | 38 att | — | 38 | 8 | 25% | 0 | 0% |
| Zach ErtzWAS · TE | 14.7 | 18.9 | −4.2 | 76% | 32% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 11 | 32% |
| Caleb WilliamsCHI · QB | 9.9 | 16.5 | −6.6 | 100% | 24 att | — | 24 | 9 | 27% | 0 | 0% |
| Terry McLaurinWAS · WR | 17.5 | 13.7 | +3.8 | 72% | 24% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 24% |
| Brian Robinson Jr.WAS · RB | 8.6 | 12.1 | −3.5 | 47% | 50% car | — | 0 | 16 | 50% | 1 | 3% |
| Keenan AllenCHI · WR | 5.9 | 12.0 | −6.1 | 97% | 33% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 33% |
| D'Andre SwiftCHI · RB | 18.9 | 11.7 | +7.2 | 73% | 55% car | — | 0 | 18 | 55% | 0 | 0% |
| Rome OdunzeCHI · WR | 8.4 | 11.6 | −3.2 | 75% | 29% tgt | — | 0 | 2 | 6% | 6 | 29% |
| Noah BrownWAS · WR | 16.3 | 10.3 | +6.0 | 81% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 18% |
| Austin EkelerWAS · RB | 7.8 | 9.7 | −1.9 | 57% | 22% car | — | 0 | 7 | 22% | 3 | 9% |
| DJ MooreCHI · WR | 5.4 | 8.2 | −2.8 | 95% | 19% tgt | — | 0 | 2 | 6% | 4 | 19% |
| Gerald EverettCHI · TE | 1.3 | 3.4 | −2.1 | 33% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 10% |
| John BatesWAS · TE | 3.0 | 3.4 | −0.4 | 34% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
| Luke McCaffreyWAS · WR | 1.8 | 3.4 | −1.6 | 34% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 4.4 | 1.7 | +2.7 | 78% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 5% |
| DeAndre CarterCHI · WR | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 5% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 5% |
| Dyami BrownWAS · WR | 1.6 | 1.7 | −0.1 | 32% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Roschon JohnsonCHI · RB | 6.6 | 1.3 | +5.3 | 27% | 6% car | — | 0 | 2 | 6% | 0 | 0% |
| Jeremy McNicholsWAS · RB | -0.1 | 0.7 | −0.8 | 7% | 3% car | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Bears 21 targets and 33 carries; Commanders 34 targets and 32 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2024 season: 1.71 PPR points per target (68% catch rate), 0.65 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Caleb Williams Unlucky
CHI · QB · 9.9 pts on 16.5 expected
10 of 24 passing for 131 yards; 9 carries for 47 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 16.5 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 9.4, 19.3, 11.5, 23.6, 29.6, 9.9
W2W3W4W5W6W8
Fewest points since Week 2.
Jayden Daniels
WAS · QB · 22.2 pts on 22.1 expected
21 of 38 passing for 326 yards, 1 touchdown; 8 carries for 52 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 22.1 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 28.1, 25.0, 20.7, 21.0, 5.2, 22.2
W3W4W5W6W7W8
Best score since Week 4.
Keenan Allen Volume, no payoff
CHI · WR · 5.9 pts on 12.0 expected
7 targets (33% of the team's), 2 catches for 39 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 12.0 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 6.9, 4.9, 6.3, 21.1, 5.9
W1W4W5W6W8
D'Andre Swift Ran hot
CHI · RB · 18.9 pts on 11.7 expected
18 carries (55% of the team's) for 129 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 11.7 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 8.2, 6.2, 29.5, 20.0, 21.9, 18.9
W2W3W4W5W6W8
Fewest points since Week 3.
Zach Ertz Volume, no payoff
WAS · TE · 14.7 pts on 18.9 expected
11 targets (32% of the team's), 7 catches for 77 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 18.9 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 8.8, 7.2, 3.0, 10.8, 14.0, 14.7
W3W4W5W6W7W8
Season high in targets (11). Best fantasy game of the season.
Terry McLaurin
WAS · WR · 17.5 pts on 13.7 expected
8 targets (24% of the team's), 5 catches for 125 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 13.7 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 20.0, 18.2, 13.4, 23.3, 15.8, 17.5
W3W4W5W6W7W8
Noah Brown Ran hot
WAS · WR · 16.3 pts on 10.3 expected
6 targets (18% of the team's), 3 catches for 73 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 10.3 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 8.6, 5.9, 5.6, 9.8, 2.6, 16.3
W2W3W4W6W7W8
Best fantasy game of the season.
Roschon Johnson Ran hot
CHI · RB · 6.6 pts on 1.3 expected
2 carries (6% of the team's) for 6 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 1.3 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 10.2, 8.6, 14.5, 5.3, 6.6
W3W4W5W6W8
Stock Up, Stock Down
Chicago Bears
- ▲Stock up: Keenan Allen played 97% of the snaps, up from a 74% season average.
- ▼Stock down: DeAndre Carter played 5% of the snaps, down from a 41% season average.
Washington Commanders
- ▲Stock up: Austin Ekeler led the backfield with 57% of the snaps after trailing Brian Robinson Jr. before this game.
- ▲Stock up: Noah Brown played 81% of the snaps, up from a 48% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Brian Robinson Jr. lost the backfield lead: 47% of the snaps to Austin Ekeler's 57%.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2024 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Bears D | Commanders D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 13.8 | 15.8 |
| RBs | 25.2 | 22.0 |
| WRs | 28.9 | 30.9 |
| TEs | 12.3 | 10.8 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Washington opened at 50% win probability, fell as low as <1%, then rallied to win.
Commanders win probability
Key Swings
- +9Seibert 27-yd FG50% → 59%Q1 8:51
- +9Seibert 30-yd FG60% → 69%Q1 1:04
- −19Swift 56-yd TD run96% → 77%Q3 0:43
- −100Johnson 1-yd TD run>99% → <1%Q4 0:25
- +100Daniels → Brown, 52-yd TD<1% → >99%Q4 0:00
Swing in Commanders win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Chicago Bears | Measure | Washington Commanders |
|---|---|---|
| 60 | Plays | 72 |
| 45% | Pass rate | 56% |
| 3.9 | Yds / dropback | 7.8 |
| 6.1 | Yds / carry | 5.3 |
| 2/12 | Third downs | 5/15 |
Efficiency edge Washington ran 12 more plays and gained 3.9 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- CHI Allen 33% · Odunze 29% · Moore 19%
- WAS Ertz 32% · McLaurin 24% · Brown 18%
Possession Results
| Result | CHI | WAS |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 2 | 1 |
| Field goals | 0 | 4 |
| Punts | 7 | 5 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 0 |
| Turnovers on downs | 1 | 0 |
| Missed field goals | 0 | 1 |
WAS turnover edge: +1
- The Commanders opened the scoring on their first possession, a 9-play, 56-yard drive that ended in a field goal.
All 23 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 3 | -10 | 1:57 | Punt |
| WAS | Q1 13:03 | 9 | 56 | 4:12 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q1 8:51 | 6 | 30 | 2:48 | Punt |
| WAS | Q1 6:03 | 12 | 79 | 4:59 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q1 1:04 | 3 | 9 | 2:03 | Punt |
| WAS | Q2 14:01 | 4 | 24 | 2:05 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 11:56 | 6 | 20 | 3:31 | Downs |
| WAS | Q2 8:25 | 7 | 31 | 3:01 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q2 5:24 | 10 | 31 | 4:29 | Punt |
| WAS | Q2 0:55 | 6 | 72 | 0:55 | End of half |
| WAS | Q3 15:00 | 8 | 31 | 4:42 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 10:18 | 3 | 3 | 0:40 | Punt |
| WAS | Q3 9:38 | 7 | 12 | 3:50 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q3 5:48 | 5 | 10 | 3:04 | Punt |
| WAS | Q3 2:44 | 3 | 7 | 1:15 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 1:29 | 2 | 59 | 0:46 | Touchdown |
| WAS | Q3 0:43 | 6 | 43 | 1:39 | Missed FG |
| CHI | Q4 14:04 | 3 | -5 | 0:20 | Punt |
| WAS | Q4 13:44 | 8 | 42 | 3:16 | Punt |
| CHI | Q4 10:28 | 9 | 84 | 4:10 | Fumble |
| WAS | Q4 6:18 | 3 | 9 | 1:57 | Punt |
| CHI | Q4 4:21 | 10 | 62 | 3:56 | Touchdown |
| WAS | Q4 0:25 | 4 | 76 | 0:25 | Touchdown |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Bears vs Commanders Head-to-Head
The Bears and Commanders first met in 1932 and have played 55 times since.
- All-time series
- 28–26–1Commanders lead, 55 meetings since 1932
- Postseason
- 4–3Split 4–3
- Largest Bears win
- 73–01940
- Largest Commanders win
- 42–01974
Since 2021
2–2 Series tied
4 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- C
- B
- C
- B
Oldest to newest. B = Bears win, C = Commanders win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wk 6 Bears at Commanders, 2025 Wk 6 recap CHI 25 WAS 24 CHI W
- 2024 Wk 8 Bears at Commanders WAS 18 CHI 15 WAS W
- 2023 Wk 5 Bears at Commanders, 2023 Wk 5 recap CHI 40 WAS 20 CHI W
- 2022 Wk 6 Commanders at Bears, 2022 Wk 6 recap WAS 12 CHI 7 WAS W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2024 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Bears | Stat | Commanders |
|---|---|---|
| 5-12 | Record | 12-5 |
| 18.2 | Points per game | 28.5 |
| 283.5 | Yards per game | 369.6 |
| 4.5 | Yards per play | 5.7 |
| 21.8 | Points allowed per game | 23.0 |
| 354.2 | Yards allowed per game | 326.9 |
Bears and Commanders in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Bear or a Commander, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Bears or Commanders player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Bears and Commanders players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Bears and Commanders defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2024 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Bears vs Commanders Game FAQ
Who won the 2024 Bears vs Commanders Week 8 game?
The Washington Commanders beat the Chicago Bears 18–15 in Week 8 of the 2024 season. The game was played at Northwest Stadium in Landover, MD, on October 27, 2024. See the Commanders' 2024 schedule.
What was the final score of Bears vs Commanders?
The final score was Commanders 18, Bears 15. The Commanders led 9–0 at halftime, and the second half went Bears 15, Commanders 9.
What happened in the Bears vs Commanders game?
Washington led 9–0 at halftime and won 18–15, though Chicago took the second half 15–9. The Commanders finished with a 481–307 edge in total offense and averaged 6.7 yards per play. Jayden Daniels led all players with 21 of 38 passing for 326 yards and a touchdown, plus 8 carries for 52 rushing yards. The Bears committed 1 turnover, the Commanders none.
What was the game-winning score in Bears vs Commanders?
Jayden Daniels' 52-yard touchdown pass to Noah Brown with 0:00 left in the fourth quarter gave the Commanders a 18–15 lead they never gave up. It was the final score of the game.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Bears vs Commanders?
Jayden Daniels led the game with 22.2 PPR fantasy points, the QB11 of Week 8, on 21 of 38 passing for 326 yards and a touchdown, plus 8 carries for 52 rushing yards. D'Andre Swift was next with 18.9 (RB11). See Jayden Daniels's 2024 game log.
Who led Bears vs Commanders in passing, rushing and receiving?
Jayden Daniels (WAS) led all passers with 21 of 38 for 326 yards and a touchdown. D'Andre Swift (CHI) led in rushing with 18 carries for 129 yards and a touchdown. Terry McLaurin (WAS) led in receiving with 5 catches for 125 yards.
How many fantasy points did Jayden Daniels score against the Bears?
Jayden Daniels scored 22.2 fantasy points against the Bears in Week 8 of the 2024 season, the same in PPR, half-PPR and standard scoring because he had no catches, on 21 of 38 passing for 326 yards and a touchdown, plus 8 carries for 52 rushing yards.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Bears vs Commanders?
D'Andre Swift outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 18.9 PPR points on 11.7 xFP (+7.2). Caleb Williams fell furthest short, with 9.9 points on 16.5 xFP (−6.6). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Bears vs Commanders?
Jayden Daniels had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 22.1 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 22.2. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Commanders come back to beat the Bears?
The Commanders' chances of winning fell as low as <1% in overtime. Jayden Daniels' 52-yard touchdown pass to Noah Brown in the fourth quarter was the biggest swing of the game. Jayden Daniels' 52-yard touchdown pass to Noah Brown then put them ahead for good.
Which team won the turnover battle in Bears vs Commanders?
The Commanders won the turnover battle 1–0: the Bears gave the ball away 1 time and the Commanders not at all. The Commanders won the game.
What was the turning point of Bears vs Commanders?
Jayden Daniels' 52-yard touchdown pass to Noah Brown with 0:00 left in the fourth quarter was the biggest swing of the game, moving the Commanders' win probability from <1% to >99%.
What is the all-time Bears vs Commanders record?
The Commanders lead the all-time series 28–26–1 across 55 meetings since 1932, including a 4–3 record in the postseason.
When did the Bears and Commanders last play before this game?
Before Week 8 of 2024, they last met in the 2023 season on October 5, 2023, when the Bears beat the Commanders 40–20.
Have the Bears and Commanders met in the playoffs?
Yes, 7 times, most recently in the 1987 playoffs. The Bears are 3–4 against the Commanders in the postseason.
