Final2025 Week 10
SoFi Stadium, Inglewood, CA|
Pittsburgh Steelers vs Los Angeles Chargers, Week 10 2025
Pittsburgh Steelers
Away
10
Los Angeles Chargers
HomeWon
25
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steelers | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 10 |
| Chargers | 2 | 10 | 3 | 10 | 25 |
PIT 10 · LAC 25 Final
Passing leader
LAC · QB
14.7PPR pts
20/33, 220 YDS, 1 TD
Top fantasy scorer
LAC · WR
20.7PPR pts
4 REC, 107 YDS, 1 TD
Steelers leader
PIT · WR
11.5PPR pts
2 REC, 35 YDS, 1 TD
Defensive playmaker
RJ Mickens
LAC
1 INT, 4 TKL
Chargers 25, Steelers 10: Los Angeles beats Pittsburgh
Los Angeles led 12–3 at halftime and outscored Pittsburgh 13–7 after the break to win 25–10. The Chargers finished with a 314–221 edge in total offense and averaged 4.6 yards per play.
The gap showed up everywhere. The Steelers went 2-for-11 on third down and committed three turnovers, while the Chargers kept the ball for 37:35 and finished without a giveaway.
Key advantages
- +0.2 yards/play LAC 4.6 · PIT 4.4
- +3 turnover margin LAC 0 turnovers
- +93 total yards LAC 314 · PIT 221
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Steeler or Charger on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Chargers Won
Los Angeles won the efficiency, turnover, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Steelers | Stat | Chargers |
|---|---|---|
| 4.4 | Yards per play | 4.6 |
| 3 | Turnovers | 0 |
| 221 | Total yards | 314 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 50 | Plays | 69 |
| 18% | Third-down conversion | 35% |
| 22:25 | Time of possession | 37:35 |
Scoring Summary
The Chargers scored two touchdowns, three field goals, and one safety; the Steelers scored one touchdown and one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | PIT | LAC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 10:25 | PIT | Chris Boswell 59-yard FG Takes lead | 3 | 0 |
| 5:09 | LAC | Safety | 3 | 2 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 7:32 | LAC | Cameron Dicker 32-yard FG Takes lead | 3 | 5 |
| 0:12 | LAC | Justin Herbert → Ladd McConkey, 15-yard TD Extends leadCameron Dicker XP | 3 | 12 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 6:07 | LAC | Cameron Dicker 59-yard FG Extends lead | 3 | 15 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 9:26 | LAC | Kimani Vidal 2-yard TD run Extends leadCameron Dicker XP | 3 | 22 |
| 4:54 | LAC | Cameron Dicker 42-yard FG Extends lead | 3 | 25 |
| 2:57 | PIT | Aaron Rodgers → Roman Wilson, 27-yard TDChris Boswell XP | 10 | 25 |
Fantasy Points: Steelers vs Chargers, Week 10 2025
Fantasy leaders
- Ladd McConkeyLAC · WR20.7 PTSWR7
- Kimani VidalLAC · RB17.8 PTSRB8
- Justin HerbertLAC · QB14.7 PTSQB17
- Roman WilsonPIT · WR11.5 PTSWR32
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14.7 | QB17 | 20/33 | 220 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 19 | 0 | 90.5 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.4 | QB22 | 16/31 | 161 | 1 | 2 | — | — | — | 50.6 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.7 | WR7 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 107 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 17.8 | RB8 | RB | 25 | 95 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 11.5 | WR32 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 35 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 11.1 | RB23 | RB | 14 | 70 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 21 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.2 | WR38 | WR | — | — | — | 10 | 5 | 42 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.5 | WR47 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 3 | 35 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.3 | TE23 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 33 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.3 | TE28 | TE | — | — | — | 6 | 3 | 13 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.9 | WR62 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 2 | 19 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.4 | WR66 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 2 | 14 | 0 | ||
| 2.5 | TE39 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.4 | RB52 | RB | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 4 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.4 | WR80 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.2 | TE42 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.7 | TE46 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | ||
| 1.4 | TE50 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.3 | WR90 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.3 | RB66 | RB | 2 | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.1 | RB68 | RB | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | — |
Fantasy Usage
Pittsburgh Steelers
Snap Share
DK MetcalfWR48 snaps92%
Calvin AustinWR38 snaps73%
Jonnu SmithTE35 snaps67%
Kenny GainwellRB27 snaps52%
Pat FreiermuthTE26 snaps50%
Target Share28 targets
- DK Metcalf25%, 7 targets
- Calvin Austin25%, 7 targets
- Kenny Gainwell11%, 3 targets
- Pat Freiermuth11%, 3 targets
- Roman Wilson11%, 3 targets
- Other18%, 5 targets
Carry Share16 carries
- Jaylen Warren88%, 14 carries
- Kaleb Johnson13%, 2 carries
Los Angeles Chargers
Snap Share
Kimani VidalRB68 snaps93%
Quentin JohnstonWR60 snaps82%
Ladd McConkeyWR52 snaps71%
Oronde GadsdenTE38 snaps52%
Keenan AllenWR37 snaps51%
Target Share33 targets
- Quentin Johnston30%, 10 targets
- Ladd McConkey18%, 6 targets
- Oronde Gadsden18%, 6 targets
- Keenan Allen15%, 5 targets
- Tre' Harris6%, 2 targets
- Other12%, 4 targets
Carry Share31 carries
- Kimani Vidal81%, 25 carries
- Justin Herbert16%, 5 carries
- Jaret Patterson3%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 68 | 93% | 1 | 3% | 25 | |
| 48 | 92% | 7 | 25% | 0 | |
| 60 | 82% | 10 | 30% | 0 | |
| 38 | 73% | 7 | 25% | 0 | |
| 52 | 71% | 6 | 18% | 0 | |
| 35 | 67% | 2 | 7% | 0 | |
| 38 | 52% | 6 | 18% | 0 | |
| 27 | 52% | 3 | 11% | 0 | |
| 37 | 51% | 5 | 15% | 0 | |
| 26 | 50% | 3 | 11% | 0 | |
| 25 | 48% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 24 | 46% | 2 | 7% | 14 | |
| 32 | 44% | 2 | 6% | 0 | |
| 27 | 37% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 18 | 35% | 3 | 11% | 0 | |
| 23 | 32% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 8 | 15% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 4 | 8% | 0 | 0% | 2 | |
| 5 | 7% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 4 | 5% | 0 | 0% | 1 | |
| 2 | 4% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+10.5Ladd McConkey20.7 PTS vs 10.2 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−8.5Calvin Austin III3.4 PTS vs 11.9 xFP
- Highest expected volume17.9 xFPJustin Herbert14.7 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin HerbertLAC · QB | 14.7 | 17.9 | −3.2 | 100% | 33 att | — | 33 | 5 | 16% | 0 | 0% |
| Kimani VidalLAC · RB | 17.8 | 17.8 | 0.0 | 93% | 81% car | — | 0 | 25 | 81% | 1 | 3% |
| Quentin JohnstonLAC · WR | 9.2 | 17.0 | −7.8 | 82% | 30% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 10 | 30% |
| Aaron RodgersPIT · QB | 8.4 | 13.8 | −5.4 | 100% | 31 att | — | 31 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Jaylen WarrenPIT · RB | 11.1 | 12.4 | −1.3 | 46% | 88% car | — | 0 | 14 | 88% | 2 | 7% |
| Calvin Austin IIIPIT · WR | 3.4 | 11.9 | −8.5 | 73% | 25% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 25% |
| DK MetcalfPIT · WR | 6.5 | 11.9 | −5.4 | 92% | 25% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 25% |
| Ladd McConkeyLAC · WR | 20.7 | 10.2 | +10.5 | 71% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 18% |
| Oronde GadsdenLAC · TE | 4.3 | 10.2 | −5.9 | 52% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 18% |
| Keenan AllenLAC · WR | 3.9 | 8.5 | −4.6 | 51% | 15% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 15% |
| Kenny GainwellPIT · RB | 2.4 | 5.1 | −2.7 | 52% | 11% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 11% |
| Pat FreiermuthPIT · TE | 6.3 | 5.1 | +1.2 | 50% | 11% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 11% |
| Roman WilsonPIT · WR | 11.5 | 5.1 | +6.4 | 35% | 11% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 11% |
| Jonnu SmithPIT · TE | 1.4 | 3.4 | −2.0 | 67% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Tre' HarrisLAC · WR | 2.4 | 3.4 | −1.0 | 44% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
| Darnell WashingtonPIT · TE | 2.5 | 1.7 | +0.8 | 48% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Derius DavisLAC · WR | 1.3 | 1.7 | −0.4 | 7% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Tucker FiskLAC · TE | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 37% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Tyler ConklinLAC · TE | 2.2 | 1.7 | +0.5 | 32% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Kaleb JohnsonPIT · RB | 0.3 | 1.3 | −1.0 | 8% | 13% car | — | 0 | 2 | 13% | 0 | 0% |
| Jaret PattersonLAC · RB | 0.1 | 0.6 | −0.5 | 5% | 3% car | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Steelers 28 targets and 16 carries; Chargers 33 targets and 31 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2025 season: 1.70 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.65 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Aaron Rodgers Unlucky
PIT · QB · 8.4 pts on 13.8 expected
16 of 31 passing for 161 yards, 1 touchdown, 2 interceptions.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 13.8 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 12.8, 17.5, 24.6, 16.8, 12.1, 8.4
W4W6W7W8W9W10
Lowest-scoring game of the season.
Justin Herbert
LAC · QB · 14.7 pts on 17.9 expected
20 of 33 passing for 220 yards, 1 touchdown; 5 carries for 19 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 17.9 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 15.6, 18.8, 29.9, 26.3, 28.7, 14.7
W5W6W7W8W9W10
No interceptions after 4 in the previous four games. Fewest points since Week 4.
Jaylen Warren Volume, no payoff
PIT · RB · 11.1 pts on 12.4 expected
2 targets (7% of the team's), 2 catches for 21 yards; 14 carries (88% of the team's) for 70 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 12.4 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 13.1, 8.3, 19.8, 9.3, 16.9, 11.1
W3W6W7W8W9W10
Calvin Austin III Unlucky
PIT · WR · 3.4 pts on 11.9 expected
7 targets (25% of the team's), 2 catches for 14 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 11.9 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 3.2, 12.4, 3.3, 6.8, 10.6, 3.4
W2W3W4W8W9W10
Season high in targets (7).
Kimani Vidal Strong role
LAC · RB · 17.8 pts on 17.8 expected
1 target (3% of the team's), 1 catch for 13 yards; 25 carries (81% of the team's) for 95 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 17.8 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 2.9, 22.8, 7.5, 19.7, 3.0, 17.8
W5W6W7W8W9W10
Season high in carries (25).
Quentin Johnston Volume, no payoff
LAC · WR · 9.2 pts on 17.0 expected
10 targets (30% of the team's), 5 catches for 42 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 17.0 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 23.8, 6.9, 11.0, 0.0, 15.3, 9.2
W4W5W7W8W9W10
DK Metcalf Unlucky
PIT · WR · 6.5 pts on 11.9 expected
7 targets (25% of the team's), 3 catches for 35 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 11.9 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 23.6, 19.5, 8.0, 16.5, 2.6, 6.5
W4W6W7W8W9W10
A touchdown in 5 of the last 8 games.
Ladd McConkey Ran hot
LAC · WR · 20.7 pts on 10.2 expected
6 targets (18% of the team's), 4 catches for 107 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 10.2 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 14.9, 23.0, 15.7, 20.8, 9.6, 20.7
W5W6W7W8W9W10
Stock Up, Stock Down
Pittsburgh Steelers
- ▲Stock up: Kenny Gainwell led the backfield with 52% of the snaps after trailing Jaylen Warren before this game.
- ▼Stock down: Jaylen Warren lost the backfield lead: 46% of the snaps to Kenny Gainwell's 52%.
Los Angeles Chargers
- ▲Stock up: Kimani Vidal played 93% of the snaps, up from a 50% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Jaret Patterson played 5% of the snaps, down from a 24% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2025 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Steelers D | Chargers D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 19.4 | 13.5 |
| RBs | 18.1 | 18.6 |
| WRs | 34.7 | 25.7 |
| TEs | 16.6 | 10.5 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Los Angeles opened at 50% win probability and passed 98% in the fourth quarter on the way to the win.
Chargers win probability
Key Swings
- −9Boswell 59-yd FG50% → 41%Q1 10:25
- +6Chargers safety40% → 47%Q1 5:09
- +11Dicker 32-yd FG46% → 57%Q2 7:32
- +24Herbert → McConkey, 15-yd TD58% → 83%Q2 0:12
- +6Dicker 59-yd FG87% → 93%Q3 6:07
Swing in Chargers win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Pittsburgh Steelers | Measure | Los Angeles Chargers |
|---|---|---|
| 50 | Plays | 69 |
| 68% | Pass rate | 55% |
| 4.4 | Yds / dropback | 5.2 |
| 4.6 | Yds / carry | 3.7 |
| 2/11 | Third downs | 6/17 |
Efficiency edge Los Angeles ran 19 more plays and gained 0.8 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- PIT Austin 25% · Metcalf 25% · Gainwell 11%
- LAC Johnston 30% · McConkey 18% · Gadsden 18%
Possession Results
| Result | PIT | LAC |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 1 | 2 |
| Field goals | 1 | 3 |
| Punts | 4 | 6 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 0 |
| Turnovers on downs | 1 | 0 |
| Missed field goals | 1 | 1 |
| Safeties | 1 | 0 |
LAC turnover edge: +2
- The Steelers opened the scoring on their second possession, a 4-play, 5-yard drive that ended in a field goal.
All 25 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 6 | 1:30 | Punt |
| LAC | Q1 13:30 | 3 | 1 | 1:26 | Punt |
| PIT | Q1 12:04 | 4 | 5 | 1:39 | Field goal |
| LAC | Q1 10:25 | 7 | 18 | 3:38 | Punt |
| PIT | Q1 6:47 | 3 | -6 | 1:38 | Safety |
| LAC | Q1 5:09 | 3 | 1 | 1:58 | Punt |
| PIT | Q1 3:11 | 9 | 52 | 5:01 | Missed FG |
| LAC | Q2 13:10 | 13 | 51 | 5:38 | Field goal |
| PIT | Q2 7:32 | 3 | 2 | 1:43 | Punt |
| LAC | Q2 5:49 | 4 | 10 | 2:49 | Punt |
| PIT | Q2 3:00 | 2 | 4 | 0:51 | Interception |
| LAC | Q2 2:09 | 7 | 38 | 1:57 | Touchdown |
| PIT | Q2 0:12 | 3 | 8 | 0:12 | End of half |
| LAC | Q3 15:00 | 6 | 9 | 3:16 | Punt |
| PIT | Q3 11:44 | 4 | 19 | 3:05 | Punt |
| LAC | Q3 8:39 | 6 | 36 | 2:32 | Field goal |
| PIT | Q3 6:07 | 3 | 2 | 0:58 | Punt |
| LAC | Q3 5:09 | 7 | 27 | 4:24 | Missed FG |
| PIT | Q3 0:45 | 8 | 45 | 3:04 | Downs |
| LAC | Q4 12:41 | 6 | 90 | 3:15 | Touchdown |
| PIT | Q4 9:26 | 2 | 10 | 0:47 | Interception |
| LAC | Q4 8:39 | 3 | -9 | 2:14 | Punt |
| LAC | Q4 6:25 | 4 | -3 | 1:31 | Field goal |
| PIT | Q4 4:54 | 8 | 65 | 1:57 | Touchdown |
| LAC | Q4 2:57 | 4 | 10 | 2:57 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Steelers vs Chargers Head-to-Head
The Steelers and Chargers first met in 1971 and have played 37 times since.
- All-time series
- 25–12Steelers lead, 37 meetings since 1971
- Postseason
- 2–1Chargers won in 1982 and 1994; Steelers won in 2008
- Largest Steelers win
- 37–01975
- Largest Chargers win
- 35–71979
Since 2021
2–1 Chargers lead
3 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- C
- S
- C
Oldest to newest. C = Chargers win, S = Steelers win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wk 10 Steelers at Chargers LAC 25 PIT 10 LAC W
- 2024 Wk 3 Chargers at Steelers, 2024 Wk 3 recap PIT 20 LAC 10 PIT W
- 2021 Wk 11 Steelers at Chargers, 2021 Wk 11 recap LAC 41 PIT 37 LAC W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2025 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Steelers | Stat | Chargers |
|---|---|---|
| 10-7 | Record | 11-6 |
| 23.4 | Points per game | 21.6 |
| 305.6 | Yards per game | 333.8 |
| 5.3 | Yards per play | 5.2 |
| 22.8 | Points allowed per game | 20.0 |
| 356.9 | Yards allowed per game | 285.2 |
Steelers and Chargers in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Steeler or a Charger, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Steelers or Chargers player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Steelers and Chargers players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Steelers and Chargers defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2025 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Steelers vs Chargers Game FAQ
Who won the 2025 Steelers vs Chargers Week 10 game?
The Los Angeles Chargers beat the Pittsburgh Steelers 25–10 in Week 10 of the 2025 season. The game was played at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, CA, on November 9, 2025. See the Chargers' 2025 schedule.
What was the final score of Steelers vs Chargers?
The final score was Chargers 25, Steelers 10. The Chargers led 12–3 at halftime, and the second half went Steelers 7, Chargers 13.
What happened in the Steelers vs Chargers game?
Los Angeles led 12–3 at halftime and outscored Pittsburgh 13–7 after the break to win 25–10. The Chargers finished with a 314–221 edge in total offense and averaged 4.6 yards per play. Ladd McConkey led all players with 4 catches for 107 yards and a touchdown. The Steelers committed 3 turnovers, the Chargers none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Steelers vs Chargers?
Ladd McConkey led the game with 20.7 PPR fantasy points, the WR7 of Week 10, on 4 catches for 107 yards and a touchdown. Kimani Vidal was next with 17.8 (RB8). See Ladd McConkey's 2025 game log.
Who led Steelers vs Chargers in passing, rushing and receiving?
Justin Herbert (LAC) led all passers with 20 of 33 for 220 yards and a touchdown. Kimani Vidal (LAC) led in rushing with 25 carries for 95 yards and a touchdown. Ladd McConkey (LAC) led in receiving with 4 catches for 107 yards and a touchdown.
How many fantasy points did Ladd McConkey score against the Steelers?
Ladd McConkey scored 20.7 points in PPR leagues, 18.7 in half-PPR and 16.7 in standard scoring against the Steelers in Week 10 of the 2025 season, on 4 catches for 107 yards and a touchdown.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Steelers vs Chargers?
Ladd McConkey outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 20.7 PPR points on 10.2 xFP (+10.5). Calvin Austin III fell furthest short, with 3.4 points on 11.9 xFP (−8.5). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Steelers vs Chargers?
Justin Herbert had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 17.9 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 14.7. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Chargers beat the Steelers?
The Chargers beat the Steelers 25–10 because they averaged 4.6 yards per play to 4.4, won the turnover battle 3–0, and outgained them 314–221.
Which team won the turnover battle in Steelers vs Chargers?
The Chargers won the turnover battle 3–0: the Steelers gave the ball away 3 times and the Chargers not at all. The Chargers won the game.
What is the all-time Steelers vs Chargers record?
The Steelers lead the all-time series 25–12 across 37 meetings since 1971, including a 1–2 record in the postseason.
When did the Steelers and Chargers last play before this game?
Before Week 10 of 2025, they last met in the 2024 season on September 22, 2024, when the Steelers beat the Chargers 20–10.
Have the Steelers and Chargers met in the playoffs?
Yes, 3 times, most recently in the 2008 playoffs. The Steelers are 1–2 against the Chargers in the postseason.
What is the Steelers vs Chargers record since 2021?
The Chargers lead 2–1 across 3 meetings since the 2021 season, including this game.
