Final2025 Week 9
Nissan Stadium, Nashville, TN|
Los Angeles Chargers vs Tennessee Titans
Los Angeles Chargers
AwayWon
27
Tennessee Titans
Home
20
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chargers | 7 | 13 | 0 | 7 | 27 |
| Titans | 14 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 20 |
LAC 27 · TEN 20 Final
Passing leader
LAC · QB
28.7PPR pts
19/29, 250 YDS, 2 TD, 1 INT, 1 RUSH TD
Top fantasy scorer
LAC · WR
15.3PPR pts
4 REC, 53 YDS, 1 TD
Titans leader
TEN · RB
9.2PPR pts
7 ATT, 26 YDS, 3 REC, 36 REC YDS
Defensive playmaker
Cody Barton
TEN
1 INT, 1 TD, 6 TKL
Chargers 27, Titans 20: Los Angeles beats Tennessee
Los Angeles led 20–17 at halftime and outscored Tennessee 7–3 after the break to win 27–20. The Chargers finished with a 343–206 edge in total offense and averaged 5.3 yards per play.
The Titans went 1-for-9 on third down, while the Chargers kept the ball for 34:20.
Key advantages
- +0.6 yards/play LAC 5.3 · TEN 4.7
- +137 total yards LAC 343 · TEN 206
- +43% third-down rate LAC 54% · TEN 11%
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Charger or Titan on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Chargers Won
Los Angeles won the efficiency, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Chargers | Stat | Titans |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 | Yards per play | 4.7 |
| 343 | Total yards | 206 |
| 54% | Third-down conversion | 11% |
| Other team stats | ||
| 65 | Plays | 44 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 0 |
| 34:20 | Time of possession | 25:40 |
Scoring Summary
The Chargers scored three touchdowns and two field goals; the Titans scored two touchdowns and two field goals.
| Time | Team | Play | LAC | TEN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 11:19 | TEN | Cody Barton 24-yard interception return TD Takes leadJoey Slye XP | 0 | 7 |
| 7:24 | LAC | Justin Herbert → Scott Matlock, 2-yard TD Ties gameCameron Dicker XP | 7 | 7 |
| 2:55 | TEN | Chimere Dike 67-yard punt return TD Takes leadJoey Slye XP | 7 | 14 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 14:06 | LAC | Cameron Dicker 27-yard FG | 10 | 14 |
| 8:37 | LAC | Justin Herbert → Quentin Johnston, 19-yard TD Takes leadCameron Dicker XP | 17 | 14 |
| 5:02 | TEN | Joey Slye 49-yard FG Ties game | 17 | 17 |
| 0:20 | LAC | Cameron Dicker 52-yard FG Takes lead | 20 | 17 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| No scoring | ||||
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 12:58 | LAC | Justin Herbert 1-yard TD run Extends leadCameron Dicker XP | 27 | 17 |
| 4:19 | TEN | Joey Slye 37-yard FG | 27 | 20 |
Fantasy Points: Chargers vs Titans, Week 9 2025
Fantasy leaders
- Justin HerbertLAC · QB28.7 PTSQB4
- Quentin JohnstonLAC · WR15.3 PTSWR23
- Oronde GadsdenLAC · TE11.8 PTSTE10
- Ladd McConkeyLAC · WR9.6 PTSWR37
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28.7 | QB4 | 19/29 | 250 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 57 | 1 | 101.2 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.4 | QB26 | 12/21 | 145 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 78.5 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15.3 | WR23 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 53 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 11.8 | TE10 | TE | — | — | — | 5 | 5 | 68 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.6 | WR37 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 56 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.2 | RB25 | RB | 7 | 26 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 36 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.8 | RB28 | RB | 10 | 56 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.6 | WR50 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 3 | 46 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.5 | WR51 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 5 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.1 | WR56 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 2 | 41 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.4 | RB41 | RB | 9 | 44 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 3.8 | WR66 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.1 | WR73 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 1 | 21 | 0 | ||
| 3.0 | RB45 | RB | 12 | 30 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.0 | TE42 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.5 | TE44 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.2 | TE46 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fantasy Usage
Los Angeles Chargers
Snap Share
Oronde GadsdenTE52 snaps80%
Kimani VidalRB47 snaps72%
Ladd McConkeyWR45 snaps69%
Quentin JohnstonWR44 snaps68%
Tucker FiskTE31 snaps48%
Target Share27 targets
- Quentin Johnston22%, 6 targets
- Ladd McConkey22%, 6 targets
- Keenan Allen19%, 5 targets
- Oronde Gadsden19%, 5 targets
- Tre' Harris7%, 2 targets
- Other11%, 3 targets
Carry Share30 carries
- Kimani Vidal40%, 12 carries
- Justin Herbert30%, 9 carries
- Jaret Patterson30%, 9 carries
Tennessee Titans
Snap Share
Chimere DikeWR41 snaps87%
Van JeffersonWR39 snaps83%
Chig OkonkwoTE32 snaps68%
Elic AyomanorWR30 snaps64%
Tony PollardRB29 snaps62%
Target Share21 targets
- Elic Ayomanor29%, 6 targets
- Van Jefferson19%, 4 targets
- Tyjae Spears14%, 3 targets
- Chimere Dike14%, 3 targets
- Tony Pollard10%, 2 targets
- Other14%, 3 targets
Carry Share19 carries
- Tony Pollard53%, 10 carries
- Tyjae Spears37%, 7 carries
- Cam Ward11%, 2 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | 87% | 3 | 14% | 0 | |
| 39 | 83% | 4 | 19% | 0 | |
| 52 | 80% | 5 | 19% | 0 | |
| 47 | 72% | 1 | 4% | 12 | |
| 45 | 69% | 6 | 22% | 0 | |
| 32 | 68% | 2 | 10% | 0 | |
| 44 | 68% | 6 | 22% | 0 | |
| 30 | 64% | 6 | 29% | 0 | |
| 29 | 62% | 2 | 10% | 10 | |
| 31 | 48% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 30 | 46% | 2 | 7% | 0 | |
| 21 | 45% | 3 | 14% | 7 | |
| 21 | 45% | 1 | 5% | 0 | |
| 24 | 37% | 5 | 19% | 0 | |
| 18 | 28% | 0 | 0% | 9 | |
| 11 | 23% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 5 | 8% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 3 | 6% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+10.0Justin Herbert28.7 PTS vs 18.7 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−6.5Kimani Vidal3.0 PTS vs 9.5 xFP
- Highest expected volume18.7 xFPJustin Herbert28.7 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin HerbertLAC · QB | 28.7 | 18.7 | +10.0 | 100% | 29 att | — | 29 | 9 | 30% | 0 | 0% |
| Cam WardTEN · QB | 6.4 | 10.6 | −4.2 | 100% | 21 att | — | 21 | 2 | 11% | 0 | 0% |
| Elic AyomanorTEN · WR | 7.6 | 10.2 | −2.6 | 64% | 29% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 29% |
| Ladd McConkeyLAC · WR | 9.6 | 10.2 | −0.6 | 69% | 21% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 21% |
| Quentin JohnstonLAC · WR | 15.3 | 10.2 | +5.1 | 68% | 21% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 21% |
| Tony PollardTEN · RB | 7.8 | 9.9 | −2.1 | 62% | 53% car | — | 0 | 10 | 53% | 2 | 10% |
| Tyjae SpearsTEN · RB | 9.2 | 9.6 | −0.4 | 45% | 37% car | — | 0 | 7 | 37% | 3 | 14% |
| Kimani VidalLAC · RB | 3.0 | 9.5 | −6.5 | 72% | 40% car | — | 0 | 12 | 40% | 1 | 4% |
| Keenan AllenLAC · WR | 6.1 | 8.5 | −2.4 | 37% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 18% |
| Oronde GadsdenLAC · TE | 11.8 | 8.5 | +3.3 | 80% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 18% |
| Van JeffersonTEN · WR | 3.1 | 6.8 | −3.7 | 83% | 19% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 19% |
| Jaret PattersonLAC · RB | 4.4 | 5.8 | −1.4 | 28% | 30% car | — | 0 | 9 | 30% | 0 | 0% |
| Chimere DikeTEN · WR | 1.5 | 5.1 | −3.6 | 87% | 14% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 14% |
| Chig OkonkwoTEN · TE | 3.0 | 3.4 | −0.4 | 68% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 10% |
| Tre' HarrisLAC · WR | 3.8 | 3.4 | +0.4 | 46% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Gunnar HelmTEN · TE | 2.5 | 1.7 | +0.8 | 45% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 5% |
| KeAndre Lambert-SmithLAC · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 8% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Scott MatlockLAC · — | 7.2 | 1.7 | +5.5 | — | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Tucker FiskLAC · TE | 2.2 | 1.7 | +0.5 | 48% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
Team totals: Chargers 28 targets and 30 carries; Titans 21 targets and 19 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2025 season: 1.70 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.65 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Justin Herbert Ran hot
LAC · QB · 28.7 pts on 18.7 expected
19 of 29 passing for 250 yards, 2 touchdowns, 1 interception; 9 carries for 57 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 18.7 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 14.5, 15.6, 18.8, 29.9, 26.3, 28.7
W4W5W6W7W8W9
Cam Ward
TEN · QB · 6.4 pts on 10.6 expected
12 of 21 passing for 145 yards; 2 carries for 6 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 10.6 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 5.5, 9.0, 7.9, 11.2, 13.8, 6.4
W4W5W6W7W8W9
No interceptions after 4 in the previous four games. Fewest points since Week 4.
Ladd McConkey
LAC · WR · 9.6 pts on 10.2 expected
6 targets (21% of the team's), 4 catches for 56 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 10.2 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 2.1, 14.9, 23.0, 15.7, 20.8, 9.6
W4W5W6W7W8W9
Fewest points since Week 4.
Quentin Johnston Ran hot
LAC · WR · 15.3 pts on 10.2 expected
6 targets (21% of the team's), 4 catches for 53 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 10.2 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 14.9, 23.8, 6.9, 11.0, 0.0, 15.3
W3W4W5W7W8W9
Best score since Week 4. A touchdown in 5 of the last 8 games.
Elic Ayomanor
TEN · WR · 7.6 pts on 10.2 expected
6 targets (29% of the team's), 3 catches for 46 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 10.2 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 6.4, 3.8, 5.7, 4.9, 9.2, 7.6
W4W5W6W7W8W9
Tony Pollard
TEN · RB · 7.8 pts on 9.9 expected
2 targets (10% of the team's), 1 catch for 12 yards; 10 carries (53% of the team's) for 56 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 9.9 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 10.6, 14.8, 6.7, 12.1, 6.3, 7.8
W4W5W6W7W8W9
Kimani Vidal Unlucky
LAC · RB · 3.0 pts on 9.5 expected
1 target (4% of the team's), 0 catches for 0 yards; 12 carries (40% of the team's) for 30 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 9.5 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 0.0, 2.9, 22.8, 7.5, 19.7, 3.0
W4W5W6W7W8W9
Fewest points since Week 5.
Scott Matlock Ran hot
LAC · — · 7.2 pts on 1.7 expected
1 target (4% of the team's), 1 catch for 2 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 1.7 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Los Angeles Chargers
- ▲Stock up: Kimani Vidal played 72% of the snaps, up from a 46% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Oronde Gadsden played 80% of the snaps, up from a 60% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Keenan Allen played 37% of the snaps, down from a 58% season average.
Tennessee Titans
- ▲Stock up: Van Jefferson played 83% of the snaps, up from a 46% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Chimere Dike played 87% of the snaps, up from a 49% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Elic Ayomanor played 64% of the snaps, down from a 83% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2025 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Chargers D | Titans D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 13.5 | 19.3 |
| RBs | 18.6 | 20.3 |
| WRs | 25.7 | 35.2 |
| TEs | 10.5 | 14.2 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Tennessee opened at 50% win probability and fell below 2% in the fourth quarter.
Titans win probability
Key Swings
- +20Barton 24-yd pick-six50% → 70%Q1 11:19
- −21Herbert → Matlock, 2-yd TD71% → 50%Q1 7:24
- +22Dike 67-yd TD50% → 72%Q1 2:55
- −25Herbert → Johnston, 19-yd TD64% → 39%Q2 8:37
- −26Herbert 1-yd TD run32% → 6%Q4 12:58
Swing in Titans win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Los Angeles Chargers | Measure | Tennessee Titans |
|---|---|---|
| 65 | Plays | 44 |
| 54% | Pass rate | 57% |
| 6.1 | Yds / dropback | 4.7 |
| 4.4 | Yds / carry | 4.6 |
| 7/13 | Third downs | 1/9 |
Efficiency edge Los Angeles ran 21 more plays and gained 1.4 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- LAC McConkey 21% · Johnston 21% · Allen 18%
- TEN Ayomanor 29% · Jefferson 19% · Dike 14%
Possession Results
| Result | LAC | TEN |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 3 | 0 |
| Field goals | 2 | 2 |
| Punts | 4 | 5 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 0 |
| Turnovers on downs | 0 | 1 |
TEN turnover edge: +1
- The Chargers opened the scoring on their second possession, a 7-play, 76-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
- The Chargers drained the clock with two second-half drives of four to ten minutes.
All 20 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEN | Q1 15:00 | 6 | 30 | 2:57 | Punt |
| LAC | Q1 12:03 | 2 | 5 | 0:44 | Interception |
| LAC | Q1 11:19 | 7 | 76 | 3:55 | Touchdown |
| TEN | Q1 7:24 | 5 | 19 | 2:44 | Punt |
| LAC | Q1 4:40 | 3 | -5 | 1:45 | Punt |
| LAC | Q1 2:55 | 9 | 56 | 3:49 | Field goal |
| TEN | Q2 14:06 | 3 | -6 | 2:02 | Punt |
| LAC | Q2 12:04 | 6 | 70 | 3:27 | Touchdown |
| TEN | Q2 8:37 | 5 | 29 | 3:35 | Field goal |
| LAC | Q2 5:02 | 3 | -9 | 1:10 | Punt |
| TEN | Q2 3:52 | 3 | -1 | 1:29 | Punt |
| LAC | Q2 2:23 | 6 | 40 | 2:03 | Field goal |
| TEN | Q2 0:20 | 2 | -8 | 0:20 | End of half |
| LAC | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 8 | 1:46 | Punt |
| TEN | Q3 13:14 | 11 | 71 | 6:13 | Downs |
| LAC | Q3 7:01 | 15 | 99 | 9:03 | Touchdown |
| TEN | Q4 12:58 | 3 | -5 | 2:07 | Punt |
| LAC | Q4 10:51 | 3 | -17 | 2:19 | Punt |
| TEN | Q4 8:32 | 8 | 40 | 4:13 | Field goal |
| LAC | Q4 4:19 | 10 | 30 | 4:19 | End of game |
About these numbers
The Titans' interception touchdown is counted as a Chargers interception, not as a Titans possession. Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Chargers vs Titans Head-to-Head
The Chargers and Titans first met in 1960 and have played 51 times since.
- All-time series
- 31–19–1Chargers lead, 51 meetings since 1960
- Postseason
- 3–1Split 3–1
- Largest Chargers win
- 40–72006
- Largest Titans win
- 27–01992
Since 2021
3–1 Chargers lead
4 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- C
- T
- C
- C
Oldest to newest. C = Chargers win, T = Titans win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wk 9 Chargers at Titans, 2025 Wk 9 recap LAC 27 TEN 20 LAC W
- 2024 Wk 10 Titans at Chargers, 2024 Wk 10 recap LAC 27 TEN 17 LAC W
- 2023 Wk 2 Chargers at Titans, 2023 Wk 2 recap TEN 27 LAC 24 TEN W
- 2022 Wk 15 Titans at Chargers, 2022 Wk 15 recap LAC 17 TEN 14 LAC W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2025 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Chargers | Stat | Titans |
|---|---|---|
| 11-6 | Record | 3-14 |
| 21.6 | Points per game | 16.7 |
| 333.8 | Yards per game | 259.6 |
| 5.2 | Yards per play | 4.4 |
| 20.0 | Points allowed per game | 28.1 |
| 285.2 | Yards allowed per game | 345.1 |
Chargers and Titans in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Charger or a Titan, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Chargers or Titans player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Chargers and Titans players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Chargers and Titans defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2025 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Chargers vs Titans Game FAQ
Who won the 2025 Chargers vs Titans Week 9 game?
The Los Angeles Chargers beat the Tennessee Titans 27–20 in Week 9 of the 2025 season. The game was played at Nissan Stadium in Nashville, TN, on November 2, 2025. See the Chargers' 2025 schedule.
What was the final score of Chargers vs Titans?
The final score was Chargers 27, Titans 20. The Chargers led 20–17 at halftime, and the second half went Chargers 7, Titans 3.
What happened in the Chargers vs Titans game?
Los Angeles led 20–17 at halftime and outscored Tennessee 7–3 after the break to win 27–20. The Chargers finished with a 343–206 edge in total offense and averaged 5.3 yards per play. Justin Herbert led all players with 19 of 29 passing for 250 yards and 2 touchdowns, plus 9 carries for 57 rushing yards and a touchdown. The Chargers committed 1 turnover, the Titans none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Chargers vs Titans?
Justin Herbert led the game with 28.7 PPR fantasy points, the QB4 of Week 9, on 19 of 29 passing for 250 yards and 2 touchdowns, plus 9 carries for 57 rushing yards and a touchdown. Quentin Johnston was next with 15.3 (WR23). See Justin Herbert's 2025 game log.
Who led Chargers vs Titans in passing, rushing and receiving?
Justin Herbert (LAC) led all passers with 19 of 29 for 250 yards, 2 touchdowns and an interception. Justin Herbert (LAC) led in rushing with 9 carries for 57 yards and a touchdown. Oronde Gadsden (LAC) led in receiving with 5 catches for 68 yards.
How many fantasy points did Justin Herbert score against the Titans?
Justin Herbert scored 28.7 fantasy points against the Titans in Week 9 of the 2025 season, the same in PPR, half-PPR and standard scoring because he had no catches, on 19 of 29 passing for 250 yards and 2 touchdowns, plus 9 carries for 57 rushing yards and a touchdown.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Chargers vs Titans?
Justin Herbert outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 28.7 PPR points on 18.7 xFP (+10.0). Kimani Vidal fell furthest short, with 3.0 points on 9.5 xFP (−6.5). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Chargers vs Titans?
Justin Herbert had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 18.7 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 28.7. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Chargers beat the Titans?
The Chargers beat the Titans 27–20 because they averaged 5.3 yards per play to 4.7 and outgained them 343–206.
Which team won the turnover battle in Chargers vs Titans?
The Titans won the turnover battle 1–0: the Chargers gave the ball away 1 time and the Titans not at all. The Chargers won the game anyway.
What was the turning point of Chargers vs Titans?
Justin Herbert's 1-yard touchdown run with 12:58 left in the fourth quarter was the biggest swing of the game, moving the Titans' win probability from 32% to 6%.
What is the all-time Chargers vs Titans record?
The Chargers lead the all-time series 31–19–1 across 51 meetings since 1960, including a 1–3 record in the postseason.
When did the Chargers and Titans last play before this game?
Before Week 9 of 2025, they last met in the 2024 season on November 10, 2024, when the Chargers beat the Titans 27–17.
Have the Chargers and Titans met in the playoffs?
Yes, 4 times, most recently in the 2007 playoffs. The Chargers are 1–3 against the Titans in the postseason.
What is the Chargers vs Titans record since 2021?
The Chargers lead 3–1 across 4 meetings since the 2021 season, including this game.
