Final2022 Week 11
Mercedes-Benz Stadium, Atlanta, GA|
Chicago Bears vs Atlanta Falcons, Week 11 2022
Chicago Bears
Away
24
Atlanta Falcons
HomeWon
27
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bears | 7 | 10 | 0 | 7 | 24 |
| Falcons | 7 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 27 |
CHI 24 · ATL 27 Final
Passing leader
CHI · QB
23.6PPR pts
14/21, 153 YDS, 1 TD, 1 INT, 1 RUSH TD
Top fantasy scorer
CHI · RB
21.1PPR pts
17 ATT, 67 YDS, 1 TD, 3 REC, 54 REC YDS
Bears leader
CHI · WR
12.9PPR pts
4 REC, 29 YDS, 1 TD
Defensive playmaker
Cordarrelle Patterson
ATL · RB
1 TD
Falcons 27, Bears 24: Atlanta holds off Chicago
Atlanta broke a 17–17 halftime tie, outscoring Chicago 10–7 after the break to win 27–24. Chicago outgained the Falcons 288–280, but the Falcons averaged 5.3 yards per play.
The Bears went 9-for-16 on third down and committed one turnover.
The two teams meet again in Week 6 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +0.9 yards/play ATL 5.3 · CHI 4.4
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Bear or Falcon on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Falcons Won
Atlanta won the efficiency battle.
| Bears | Stat | Falcons |
|---|---|---|
| 4.4 | Yards per play | 5.3 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 288 | Total yards | 280 |
| 66 | Plays | 53 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 2 |
| 56% | Third-down conversion | 22% |
| 35:10 | Time of possession | 24:50 |
Scoring Summary
The Falcons scored three touchdowns and two field goals; the Bears scored three touchdowns and one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | CHI | ATL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 9:37 | ATL | Marcus Mariota → Drake London, 2-yard TD Takes leadYounghoe Koo XP | 0 | 7 |
| 6:02 | CHI | Justin Fields → Darnell Mooney, 16-yard TD Ties gameCairo Santos XP | 7 | 7 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 7:42 | CHI | Cairo Santos 41-yard FG Takes lead | 10 | 7 |
| 4:31 | CHI | Justin Fields 4-yard TD run Extends leadCairo Santos XP | 17 | 7 |
| 4:18 | ATL | Cordarrelle Patterson 103-yard kickoff return TDYounghoe Koo XP | 17 | 14 |
| 0:00 | ATL | Younghoe Koo 40-yard FG Ties game | 17 | 17 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 1:48 | ATL | Marcus Mariota 10-yard TD run Takes leadYounghoe Koo XP | 17 | 24 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 8:16 | CHI | David Montgomery 2-yard TD run Ties gameCairo Santos XP | 24 | 24 |
| 1:47 | ATL | Younghoe Koo 53-yard FG Game winner | 24 | 27 |
Fantasy Points: Bears vs Falcons, Week 11 2022
Fantasy leaders
- Justin FieldsCHI · QB23.6 PTSQB7
- David MontgomeryCHI · RB21.1 PTSRB6
- Marcus MariotaATL · QB17.7 PTSQB14
- Darnell MooneyCHI · WR12.9 PTSWR28
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.6 | QB7 | 14/21 | 153 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 85 | 1 | 84.0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 17.7 | QB14 | 13/20 | 131 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 25 | 1 | 100.2 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.1 | RB6 | RB | 17 | 67 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 54 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 12.9 | WR28 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 29 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 11.9 | RB21 | RB | 10 | 52 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 | ||
| 7.4 | RB31 | RB | 8 | 55 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.3 | TE14 | TE | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 43 | 0 | ||
| 7.2 | WR49 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.5 | TE17 | TE | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 35 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.9 | WR63 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 29 | 0 | ||
| 4.4 | WR69 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 24 | 0 | ||
| 3.2 | WR76 | WR | 1 | 13 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.1 | WR79 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 11 | 0 | ||
| 2.7 | TE36 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 17 | 0 | ||
| 2.3 | WR86 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | ||
| 1.6 | RB57 | RB | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | ||
| 0.8 | RB65 | RB | 6 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fantasy Usage
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Cole KmetTE63 snaps91%
Darnell MooneyWR56 snaps81%
David MontgomeryRB55 snaps80%
Equanimeous St. BrownWR50 snaps72%
Chase ClaypoolWR29 snaps42%
Target Share19 targets
- Darnell Mooney26%, 5 targets
- David Montgomery21%, 4 targets
- Cole Kmet21%, 4 targets
- Chase Claypool16%, 3 targets
- Equanimeous St. Brown11%, 2 targets
- Other5%, 1 targets
Carry Share41 carries
- Justin Fields44%, 18 carries
- David Montgomery41%, 17 carries
- Trestan Ebner15%, 6 carries
Atlanta Falcons
Snap Share
Olamide ZaccheausWR42 snaps76%
Drake LondonWR42 snaps76%
Parker HesseTE37 snaps67%
MyCole PruittTE31 snaps56%
Tyler AllgeierRB30 snaps55%
Target Share18 targets
- Kyle Pitts28%, 5 targets
- Drake London17%, 3 targets
- Cordarrelle Patterson11%, 2 targets
- Damiere Byrd11%, 2 targets
- Olamide Zaccheaus11%, 2 targets
- Other22%, 4 targets
Carry Share33 carries
- Marcus Mariota39%, 13 carries
- Cordarrelle Patterson30%, 10 carries
- Tyler Allgeier24%, 8 carries
- Olamide Zaccheaus3%, 1 carries
- Caleb Huntley3%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 63 | 91% | 4 | 21% | 0 | |
| 56 | 81% | 5 | 26% | 0 | |
| 55 | 80% | 4 | 21% | 17 | |
| 42 | 76% | 2 | 11% | 1 | |
| 42 | 76% | 3 | 17% | 0 | |
| 50 | 72% | 2 | 11% | 0 | |
| 37 | 67% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 31 | 56% | 1 | 6% | 0 | |
| 30 | 55% | 1 | 6% | 8 | |
| 27 | 49% | 2 | 11% | 10 | |
| 24 | 44% | 5 | 28% | 0 | |
| 29 | 42% | 3 | 16% | 0 | |
| 19 | 35% | 2 | 11% | 0 | |
| 18 | 26% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 16 | 23% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 15 | 22% | 1 | 5% | 6 | |
| 14 | 20% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 8 | 12% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 8 | 12% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 6 | 11% | 1 | 6% | 0 | |
| 3 | 5% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 2 | 4% | 1 | 6% | 1 | |
| 2 | 3% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+4.6Darnell Mooney12.9 PTS vs 8.3 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−4.7Trestan Ebner0.8 PTS vs 5.5 xFP
- Highest expected volume20.5 xFPJustin Fields23.6 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin FieldsCHI · QB | 23.6 | 20.5 | +3.1 | 100% | 21 att | — | 21 | 18 | 44% | 0 | 0% |
| David MontgomeryCHI · RB | 21.1 | 17.6 | +3.5 | 80% | 41% car | — | 0 | 17 | 41% | 4 | 21% |
| Marcus MariotaATL · QB | 17.7 | 16.8 | +0.9 | 100% | 20 att | — | 20 | 13 | 39% | 0 | 0% |
| Cordarrelle PattersonATL · RB | 5.9 | 9.8 | −3.9 | 49% | 30% car | — | 0 | 10 | 30% | 2 | 11% |
| Darnell MooneyCHI · WR | 12.9 | 8.3 | +4.6 | 81% | 26% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 26% |
| Kyle Pitts Sr.ATL · TE | 7.3 | 8.3 | −1.0 | 44% | 28% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 28% |
| Tyler AllgeierATL · RB | 7.4 | 6.8 | +0.6 | 55% | 24% car | — | 0 | 8 | 24% | 1 | 6% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 6.5 | 6.7 | −0.2 | 91% | 21% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 21% |
| Trestan EbnerCHI · RB | 0.8 | 5.5 | −4.7 | 22% | 15% car | — | 0 | 6 | 15% | 1 | 5% |
| Chase ClaypoolCHI · WR | 3.1 | 5.0 | −1.9 | 42% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 16% |
| Drake LondonATL · WR | 7.2 | 5.0 | +2.2 | 76% | 17% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 17% |
| Olamide ZaccheausATL · WR | 3.2 | 4.0 | −0.8 | 76% | 11% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 2 | 11% |
| Damiere ByrdATL · WR | 4.9 | 3.3 | +1.6 | 35% | 11% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 11% |
| Equanimeous St. BrownCHI · WR | 4.4 | 3.3 | +1.1 | 72% | 11% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 11% |
| Caleb HuntleyATL · RB | 1.6 | 2.3 | −0.7 | 4% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 1 | 6% |
| KhaDarel HodgeATL · WR | 2.3 | 1.7 | +0.6 | 11% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 6% |
| MyCole PruittATL · TE | 2.7 | 1.7 | +1.0 | 56% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 6% |
Team totals: Bears 19 targets and 41 carries; Falcons 18 targets and 33 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2022 season: 1.67 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.64 per carry and 0.42 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Justin Fields
CHI · QB · 23.6 pts on 20.5 expected
14 of 21 passing for 153 yards, 1 touchdown, 1 interception; 18 carries for 85 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 20.5 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 19.4, 24.4, 26.0, 42.7, 40.4, 23.6
W6W7W8W9W10W11
Fewest points since Week 6.
Marcus Mariota
ATL · QB · 17.7 pts on 16.8 expected
13 of 20 passing for 131 yards, 1 touchdown; 13 carries for 25 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 16.8 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 24.2, 12.1, 24.4, 7.6, 18.7, 17.7
W6W7W8W9W10W11
David Montgomery
CHI · RB · 21.1 pts on 17.6 expected
4 targets (21% of the team's), 3 catches for 54 yards; 17 carries (41% of the team's) for 67 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 17.6 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 9.0, 12.2, 8.5, 5.4, 5.4, 21.1
W6W7W8W9W10W11
Best fantasy game of the season.
Darnell Mooney Short-yardage role
CHI · WR · 12.9 pts on 8.3 expected
5 targets (26% of the team's), 4 catches for 29 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 8.3 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 13.8, 8.3, 12.0, 17.5, 9.7, 12.9
W6W7W8W9W10W11
Cordarrelle Patterson
ATL · RB · 5.9 pts on 9.8 expected
2 targets (11% of the team's), 2 catches for 7 yards; 10 carries (30% of the team's) for 52 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 9.8 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 4.1, 22.3, 9.8, 18.3, 3.0, 5.9
W2W3W4W9W10W11
Kyle Pitts Sr.
ATL · TE · 7.3 pts on 8.3 expected
5 targets (28% of the team's), 3 catches for 43 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 8.3 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 10.9, 3.9, 19.0, 4.7, 4.8, 7.3
W6W7W8W9W10W11
Chase Claypool
CHI · WR · 3.1 pts on 5.0 expected
3 targets (16% of the team's), 2 catches for 11 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 5.0 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 23.4, 9.1, 12.5, 3.7, 1.8, 3.1
W6W7W8W9W10W11
Tyler Allgeier
ATL · RB · 7.4 pts on 6.8 expected
1 target (6% of the team's), 1 catch for 9 yards; 8 carries (24% of the team's) for 55 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 6.8 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 5.1, 11.0, 17.5, 13.3, 3.3, 7.4
W6W7W8W9W10W11
Stock Up, Stock Down
Chicago Bears
- ▲Stock up: David Montgomery played 80% of the snaps, up from a 64% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Chase Claypool played 42% of the snaps, down from a 76% season average.
Atlanta Falcons
- ▲Stock up: Tyler Allgeier led the backfield with 55% of the snaps after trailing Cordarrelle Patterson before this game.
- ▲Stock up: MyCole Pruitt played 56% of the snaps, up from a 23% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Cordarrelle Patterson lost the backfield lead: 49% of the snaps to Tyler Allgeier's 55%.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2022 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Bears D | Falcons D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 18.5 | 15.7 |
| RBs | 27.3 | 21.8 |
| WRs | 32.7 | 33.6 |
| TEs | 9.0 | 14.2 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Atlanta opened at 56% win probability, fell as low as 19%, then rallied to win.
Falcons win probability
Key Swings
- −23Fields 4-yd TD run43% → 19%Q2 4:31
- +24Patterson 103-yd TD19% → 43%Q2 4:18
- +32Mariota 10-yd TD run53% → 86%Q3 1:48
- −40Montgomery 2-yd TD run93% → 52%Q4 8:16
- +40Koo 53-yd FG51% → 91%Q4 1:47
Swing in Falcons win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Chicago Bears | Measure | Atlanta Falcons |
|---|---|---|
| 66 | Plays | 53 |
| 38% | Pass rate | 38% |
| 5.1 | Yds / dropback | 6.5 |
| 3.9 | Yds / carry | 4.5 |
| 9/16 | Third downs | 2/9 |
Efficiency edge Atlanta ran 13 fewer plays but gained 1.5 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- CHI Mooney 26% · Kmet 21% · Montgomery 21%
- ATL Pitts 28% · London 17% · Patterson 11%
Possession Results
| Result | CHI | ATL |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 3 | 3 |
| Field goals | 1 | 2 |
| Punts | 4 | 3 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 1 |
| Missed field goals | 1 | 0 |
- The Falcons opened the scoring on their first possession, a 10-play, 75-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
All 20 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATL | Q1 15:00 | 10 | 75 | 5:23 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q1 9:37 | 7 | 44 | 3:35 | Touchdown |
| ATL | Q1 6:02 | 6 | 18 | 3:03 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 2:59 | 5 | 17 | 2:57 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 0:02 | 5 | -4 | 2:17 | Punt |
| ATL | Q2 12:45 | 4 | 10 | 1:08 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 11:37 | 7 | 47 | 3:55 | Field goal |
| ATL | Q2 7:42 | 1 | 17 | 0:18 | Fumble |
| CHI | Q2 7:24 | 7 | 29 | 2:53 | Touchdown |
| ATL | Q2 4:31 | 0 | 0 | 0:13 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 4:18 | 10 | 37 | 3:08 | Missed FG |
| ATL | Q2 1:10 | 7 | 32 | 1:10 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 0 | 1:45 | Punt |
| ATL | Q3 13:15 | 4 | 16 | 2:32 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 10:43 | 8 | 7 | 5:28 | Punt |
| ATL | Q3 5:15 | 6 | 61 | 3:27 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q3 1:48 | 13 | 75 | 8:32 | Touchdown |
| ATL | Q4 8:16 | 12 | 40 | 6:29 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q4 1:47 | 3 | 5 | 0:40 | Interception |
| ATL | Q4 1:07 | 5 | 27 | 1:07 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Bears vs Falcons Head-to-Head
The Bears and Falcons first met in 1966 and have played 30 times since.
- All-time series
- 16–14Bears lead, 30 meetings since 1966
- Postseason
- 0No playoff meetings
- Largest Bears win
- 36–01985
- Largest Falcons win
- 46–61973
Since 2021
1–1 Series tied
2 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- F
- B
Oldest to newest. B = Bears win, F = Falcons win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 6 Bears at Falcons Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2023 Wk 17 Falcons at Bears, 2023 Wk 17 recap CHI 37 ATL 17 CHI W
- 2022 Wk 11 Bears at Falcons ATL 27 CHI 24 ATL W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2022 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Bears | Stat | Falcons |
|---|---|---|
| 3-14 | Record | 7-10 |
| 19.2 | Points per game | 21.5 |
| 307.8 | Yards per game | 318.6 |
| 5.3 | Yards per play | 5.4 |
| 27.2 | Points allowed per game | 22.7 |
| 375.9 | Yards allowed per game | 362.1 |
Bears vs Falcons Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- ATL −2Falcons covered by 1
- Total
- 48.5Over: 51 points scored (by 2.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Falcons | 25.3 | 27 | +1.8 |
| Bears | 23.3 | 24 | +0.8 |
Both offenses beat the market's expectation, and the Fantasy tab shows who cashed in.
Betting Trends
Each team's 2022 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Chicago Bears
- Against the spread
- 4–6–1
- Over/under
- 7–4
- ATS as favorite
- 0–1–1
- ATS as underdog
- 4–5
- ATS on the road
- 2–4
Atlanta Falcons
- Against the spread
- 7–4
- Over/under
- 6–5
- ATS as favorite
- 1–2
- ATS as underdog
- 6–2
- ATS at home
- 4–2
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Bears vs Falcons Fantasy Outlook for 2026
One meeting is left on the 2026 schedule: Week 6 in Atlanta. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Bears or Falcons player start in Week 6? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Bears and Falcons players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Bears and Falcons defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere this matchup falls in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2022 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Bears vs Falcons Game FAQ
Who won the 2022 Bears vs Falcons Week 11 game?
The Atlanta Falcons beat the Chicago Bears 27–24 in Week 11 of the 2022 season. The game was played at Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta, GA, on November 20, 2022. See the Falcons' 2022 schedule.
What was the final score of Bears vs Falcons?
The final score was Falcons 27, Bears 24. The teams were tied 17–17 at halftime, and the second half went Bears 7, Falcons 10.
What happened in the Bears vs Falcons game?
Atlanta broke a 17–17 halftime tie, outscoring Chicago 10–7 after the break to win 27–24. Chicago outgained the Falcons 288–280, but the Falcons averaged 5.3 yards per play. Justin Fields led all players with 14 of 21 passing for 153 yards and a touchdown, plus 18 carries for 85 rushing yards and a touchdown. The Falcons committed 2 turnovers, the Bears 1.
What was the game-winning score in Bears vs Falcons?
Younghoe Koo's 53-yard field goal with 1:47 left in the fourth quarter gave the Falcons a 27–24 lead they never gave up. It was the final score of the game.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Bears vs Falcons?
Justin Fields led the game with 23.6 PPR fantasy points, the QB7 of Week 11, on 14 of 21 passing for 153 yards and a touchdown, plus 18 carries for 85 rushing yards and a touchdown. David Montgomery was next with 21.1 (RB6). See Justin Fields's 2022 game log.
Who led Bears vs Falcons in passing, rushing and receiving?
Justin Fields (CHI) led all passers with 14 of 21 for 153 yards, a touchdown and an interception. Justin Fields (CHI) led in rushing with 18 carries for 85 yards and a touchdown. David Montgomery (CHI) led in receiving with 3 catches for 54 yards.
How many fantasy points did Justin Fields score against the Falcons?
Justin Fields scored 23.6 fantasy points against the Falcons in Week 11 of the 2022 season, the same in PPR, half-PPR and standard scoring because he had no catches, on 14 of 21 passing for 153 yards and a touchdown, plus 18 carries for 85 rushing yards and a touchdown. He handled 44% of his team's carries.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Bears vs Falcons?
Darnell Mooney outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 12.9 PPR points on 8.3 xFP (+4.6). Trestan Ebner fell furthest short, with 0.8 points on 5.5 xFP (−4.7). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
How did the Falcons come back to beat the Bears?
The Falcons' chances of winning fell as low as 19% in the first half. Younghoe Koo's 53-yard field goal then put them ahead for good.
Which team won the turnover battle in Bears vs Falcons?
The Bears won the turnover battle 2–1: the Falcons gave the ball away 2 times and the Bears 1 time. The Falcons won the game anyway.
What is the all-time Bears vs Falcons record?
The Bears lead the all-time series 16–14 across 30 meetings since 1966.
When did the Bears and Falcons last play before this game?
Before Week 11 of 2022, they last met in the 2020 season on September 27, 2020, when the Bears beat the Falcons 30–26.
What was the closing spread for Bears vs Falcons?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Falcons −2, making the Atlanta Falcons 2-point favorites, with a closing total of 48.5. That implied about 25.3 points for the Falcons and 23.3 for the Bears.
Did Bears vs Falcons go over or under the total?
The game went over. The consensus closing total was 48.5, and the teams combined for 51 points, 2.5 over the number.
Who covered the spread in Bears vs Falcons?
The Falcons covered by 1 against the closing line of Falcons −2. The final margin was 3 points.
