Final2022 Week 16
Soldier Field, Chicago, IL|
Buffalo Bills vs Chicago Bears, Week 16 2022
Buffalo Bills
AwayWon
35
Chicago Bears
Home
13
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bills | 6 | 0 | 15 | 14 | 35 |
| Bears | 7 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 |
BUF 35 · CHI 13 Final
Passing leader
BUF · QB
25.0PPR pts
15/26, 172 YDS, 2 TD, 2 INT, 1 RUSH TD
Top fantasy scorer
BUF · RB
20.5PPR pts
12 ATT, 106 YDS, 1 TD, 2 REC, 19 REC YDS
Bears leader
CHI · RB
10.4PPR pts
16 ATT, 62 YDS, 4 REC, 22 REC YDS
Defensive playmaker
Nicholas Morrow
CHI
1 INT, 8 TKL
Bills 35, Bears 13: Buffalo rallies from 4 down at halftime
Buffalo erased a 10–6 halftime deficit, outscoring Chicago 29–3 after the break to win 35–13. The Bills finished with a 426–209 edge in total offense and averaged 7.3 yards per play.
The Bears went 2-for-12 on third down and committed two turnovers.
The two teams meet again in Week 15 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +3.8 yards/play BUF 7.3 · CHI 3.5
- +217 total yards BUF 426 · CHI 209
- +38% third-down rate BUF 55% · CHI 17%
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Bill or Bear on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Bills Won
Buffalo won the efficiency and third-down battles.
| Bills | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 7.3 | Yards per play | 3.5 |
| 426 | Total yards | 209 |
| 55% | Third-down conversion | 17% |
| Other team stats | ||
| 58 | Plays | 59 |
| 3 | Turnovers | 2 |
| 28:48 | Time of possession | 31:12 |
Scoring Summary
The Bills scored five touchdowns; the Bears scored one touchdown and two field goals.
| Time | Team | Play | BUF | CHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 9:41 | CHI | Justin Fields → Dante Pettis, 6-yard TD Takes leadCairo Santos XP | 0 | 7 |
| 6:22 | BUF | Josh Allen → Gabe Davis, 19-yard TD | 6 | 7 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 3:21 | CHI | Cairo Santos 37-yard FG Extends lead | 6 | 10 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 10:51 | BUF | Devin Singletary 33-yard TD run Takes leadJosh Allen → Khalil Shakir, 2-pt conversion | 14 | 10 |
| 7:57 | BUF | James Cook 27-yard TD run Extends leadTyler Bass XP | 21 | 10 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 10:19 | CHI | Cairo Santos 35-yard FG | 21 | 13 |
| 3:45 | BUF | Josh Allen 4-yard TD run Extends leadTyler Bass XP | 28 | 13 |
| 1:02 | BUF | Josh Allen → Dawson Knox, 13-yard TD Extends leadTyler Bass XP | 35 | 13 |
Fantasy Points: Bills vs Bears, Week 16 2022
Fantasy leaders
- Josh AllenBUF · QB25.0 PTSQB4
- Devin SingletaryBUF · RB20.5 PTSRB7
- James CookBUF · RB17.8 PTSRB11
- Dawson KnoxBUF · TE12.8 PTSTE9
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25.0 | QB4 | 15/26 | 172 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 41 | 1 | 71.3 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.9 | QB25 | 15/23 | 119 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 11 | 0 | 92.5 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | 3/5 | 25 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | 33.3 |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.5 | RB7 | RB | 12 | 106 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 19 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 17.8 | RB11 | RB | 11 | 99 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 0 | ||
| 12.8 | TE9 | TE | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 38 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 11.5 | WR36 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 3 | 45 | 1 | ||
| 10.4 | RB26 | RB | 16 | 62 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 22 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.1 | WR41 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 2 | 11 | 1 | ||
| 7.7 | TE18 | TE | — | — | — | 6 | 5 | 27 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.2 | WR51 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 52 | 0 | ||
| 5.4 | WR61 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 34 | 0 | ||
| 4.6 | WR69 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 26 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.5 | WR80 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.3 | RB66 | RB | 6 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 2 | -4 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.2 | RB69 | RB | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.1 | RB70 | RB | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 0 | ||
| 1.9 | WR90 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | ||
| 1.2 | TE56 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | ||
| 0.6 | WR106 | WR | 1 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fantasy Usage
Buffalo Bills
Snap Share
Gabe DavisWR57 snaps89%
Dawson KnoxTE48 snaps75%
Stefon DiggsWR43 snaps67%
Devin SingletaryRB37 snaps58%
James CookRB26 snaps41%
Target Share25 targets
- Gabe Davis24%, 6 targets
- Dawson Knox20%, 5 targets
- Devin Singletary12%, 3 targets
- Stefon Diggs8%, 2 targets
- Isaiah McKenzie8%, 2 targets
- Other28%, 7 targets
Carry Share31 carries
- Devin Singletary39%, 12 carries
- James Cook35%, 11 carries
- Josh Allen19%, 6 carries
- Isaiah McKenzie3%, 1 carries
- Nyheim Miller-Hines3%, 1 carries
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Cole KmetTE59 snaps94%
Byron PringleWR54 snaps86%
Dante PettisWR46 snaps73%
David MontgomeryRB42 snaps67%
Velus JonesWR29 snaps46%
Target Share25 targets
- Cole Kmet24%, 6 targets
- Dante Pettis20%, 5 targets
- David Montgomery16%, 4 targets
- Velus Jones16%, 4 targets
- Khalil Herbert12%, 3 targets
- Other12%, 3 targets
Carry Share29 carries
- David Montgomery55%, 16 carries
- Justin Fields24%, 7 carries
- Khalil Herbert21%, 6 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 59 | 94% | 6 | 24% | 0 | |
| 57 | 89% | 6 | 24% | 0 | |
| 54 | 86% | 2 | 8% | 0 | |
| 48 | 75% | 5 | 20% | 0 | |
| 46 | 73% | 5 | 20% | 0 | |
| 43 | 67% | 2 | 8% | 0 | |
| 42 | 67% | 4 | 16% | 16 | |
| 37 | 58% | 3 | 12% | 12 | |
| 29 | 46% | 4 | 16% | 0 | |
| 28 | 44% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 26 | 41% | 3 | 12% | 6 | |
| 26 | 41% | 2 | 8% | 11 | |
| 25 | 39% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 23 | 36% | 2 | 8% | 1 | |
| 22 | 34% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 17 | 27% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 15 | 23% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 6 | 9% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 3 | 5% | 2 | 8% | 1 | |
| 2 | 3% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+10.1Josh Allen25.0 PTS vs 14.9 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−6.6David Montgomery10.4 PTS vs 17.0 xFP
- Highest expected volume17.0 xFPDavid Montgomery10.4 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David MontgomeryCHI · RB | 10.4 | 17.0 | −6.6 | 67% | 55% car | — | 0 | 16 | 55% | 4 | 16% |
| Josh AllenBUF · QB | 25.0 | 14.9 | +10.1 | 100% | 26 att | — | 26 | 6 | 19% | 0 | 0% |
| Justin FieldsCHI · QB | 9.9 | 14.2 | −4.3 | 92% | 23 att | — | 23 | 7 | 24% | 0 | 0% |
| Devin SingletaryBUF · RB | 20.5 | 12.7 | +7.8 | 58% | 39% car | — | 0 | 12 | 39% | 3 | 12% |
| James Cook IIIBUF · RB | 17.8 | 10.4 | +7.4 | 41% | 35% car | — | 0 | 11 | 35% | 2 | 8% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 7.7 | 10.0 | −2.3 | 94% | 24% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 24% |
| Gabe DavisBUF · WR | 11.5 | 10.0 | +1.5 | 89% | 24% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 24% |
| Khalil HerbertCHI · RB | 2.3 | 8.9 | −6.6 | 41% | 21% car | — | 0 | 6 | 21% | 3 | 12% |
| Dante PettisCHI · WR | 9.1 | 8.3 | +0.8 | 73% | 20% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 20% |
| Dawson KnoxBUF · TE | 12.8 | 8.3 | +4.5 | 75% | 20% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 20% |
| Velus Jones Jr.CHI · WR | 7.2 | 6.7 | +0.5 | 46% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 16% |
| Isaiah McKenzieBUF · WR | 0.6 | 4.0 | −3.4 | 36% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 2 | 8% |
| Nyheim HinesBUF · — | 2.1 | 4.0 | −1.9 | — | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 2 | 8% |
| Byron PringleCHI · WR | 5.4 | 3.3 | +2.1 | 86% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 8% |
| Stefon DiggsBUF · WR | 4.6 | 3.3 | +1.3 | 67% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 8% |
| Nathan PetermanCHI · QB | 0.0 | 2.1 | −2.1 | 8% | 5 att | — | 5 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Cole BeasleyBUF · WR | 1.9 | 1.7 | +0.2 | 9% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Khalil ShakirBUF · WR | 3.5 | 1.7 | +1.8 | 39% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Reggie GilliamBUF · RB | 2.2 | 1.7 | +0.5 | 23% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Ryan GriffinCHI · — | 1.2 | 1.7 | −0.5 | 27% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
Team totals: Bills 25 targets and 31 carries; Bears 25 targets and 29 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2022 season: 1.67 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.64 per carry and 0.42 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Josh Allen Ran hot
BUF · QB · 25.0 pts on 14.9 expected
15 of 26 passing for 172 yards, 2 touchdowns, 2 interceptions; 6 carries for 41 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 14.9 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 12.6, 30.9, 16.9, 20.6, 35.9, 25.0
W11W12W13W14W15W16
Justin Fields
CHI · QB · 9.9 pts on 14.2 expected
15 of 23 passing for 119 yards, 1 touchdown; 7 carries for 11 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 14.2 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 42.7, 40.4, 23.6, 21.3, 23.6, 9.9
W9W10W11W13W15W16
No interceptions after 4 in the previous four games. Fewest points since Week 3.
Devin Singletary Ran hot
BUF · RB · 20.5 pts on 12.7 expected
3 targets (12% of the team's), 2 catches for 19 yards; 12 carries (39% of the team's) for 106 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 12.7 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 17.7, 9.0, 11.1, 5.3, 10.0, 20.5
W11W12W13W14W15W16
Best score since Week 3.
James Cook III Ran hot
BUF · RB · 17.8 pts on 10.4 expected
2 targets (8% of the team's), 1 catch for 9 yards; 11 carries (35% of the team's) for 99 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 10.4 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 8.6, 3.8, 16.5, 2.5, 11.9, 17.8
W11W12W13W14W15W16
Best fantasy game of the season.
David Montgomery Unlucky
CHI · RB · 10.4 pts on 17.0 expected
4 targets (16% of the team's), 4 catches for 22 yards; 16 carries (55% of the team's) for 62 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 17.0 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 5.4, 21.1, 14.3, 16.7, 24.1, 10.4
W10W11W12W13W15W16
Fewest points since Week 10.
Cole Kmet
CHI · TE · 7.7 pts on 10.0 expected
6 targets (24% of the team's), 5 catches for 27 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 10.0 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 23.4, 6.5, 5.7, 13.2, 6.5, 7.7
W10W11W12W13W15W16
Khalil Herbert Unlucky
CHI · RB · 2.3 pts on 8.9 expected
3 targets (12% of the team's), 2 catches for -4 yards; 6 carries (21% of the team's) for 7 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 8.9 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 7.4, 15.7, 15.9, 2.3, 5.7, 2.3
W6W7W8W9W10W16
Isaiah McKenzie
BUF · WR · 0.6 pts on 4.0 expected
2 targets (8% of the team's), 0 catches for 0 yards; 1 carry (3% of the team's) for 6 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 4.0 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 0.0, 22.3, 9.4, 5.8, 4.4, 0.6
W11W12W13W14W15W16
Fewest points since Week 11.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Buffalo Bills
- ▲Stock up: James Cook III played 41% of the snaps, up from a 22% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Isaiah McKenzie played 36% of the snaps, down from a 55% season average.
Chicago Bears
- ▲Stock up: Dante Pettis played 73% of the snaps, up from a 51% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Velus Jones Jr. played 46% of the snaps, up from a 20% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Byron Pringle played 86% of the snaps, up from a 36% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2022 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Bills D | Bears D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 14.4 | 18.5 |
| RBs | 19.9 | 27.3 |
| WRs | 35.5 | 32.7 |
| TEs | 8.7 | 9.0 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Chicago opened at 28% win probability and fell below 2% in the fourth quarter.
Bears win probability
Key Swings
- +21Fields → Pettis, 6-yd TD29% → 49%Q1 9:41
- −19Allen → Davis, 19-yd TD50% → 32%Q1 6:22
- +12Santos 37-yd FG37% → 48%Q2 3:21
- −32Singletary 33-yd TD run52% → 20%Q3 10:51
- −15Cook 27-yd TD run20% → 5%Q3 7:57
Swing in Bears win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Buffalo Bills | Measure | Chicago Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 58 | Plays | 59 |
| 47% | Pass rate | 51% |
| 6.4 | Yds / dropback | 4.3 |
| 8.2 | Yds / carry | 2.8 |
| 6/11 | Third downs | 2/12 |
Efficiency edge Buffalo ran 1 fewer plays but gained 2.1 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- BUF Davis 24% · Knox 20% · Singletary 12%
- CHI Kmet 24% · Pettis 20% · Montgomery 16%
Possession Results
| Result | BUF | CHI |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 5 | 1 |
| Field goals | 0 | 2 |
| Punts | 3 | 4 |
| Turnovers | 3 | 2 |
| Turnovers on downs | 0 | 3 |
| Missed field goals | 1 | 0 |
CHI turnover edge: +1
- The Bears opened the scoring on their first possession, a 8-play, 64-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
All 25 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 8 | 64 | 5:19 | Touchdown |
| BUF | Q1 9:41 | 6 | 71 | 3:19 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q1 6:22 | 7 | 25 | 3:38 | Downs |
| BUF | Q1 2:44 | 7 | 38 | 4:51 | Interception |
| CHI | Q2 12:53 | 5 | 1 | 2:43 | Punt |
| BUF | Q2 10:10 | 3 | 2 | 2:17 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 7:53 | 8 | 19 | 4:32 | Field goal |
| BUF | Q2 3:21 | 8 | 46 | 2:30 | Missed FG |
| CHI | Q2 0:51 | 2 | -1 | 0:51 | End of half |
| BUF | Q3 15:00 | 8 | 86 | 4:09 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q3 10:51 | 4 | 9 | 2:07 | Fumble |
| BUF | Q3 8:44 | 3 | 35 | 0:47 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q3 7:57 | 3 | 5 | 1:26 | Punt |
| BUF | Q3 6:31 | 3 | 3 | 2:08 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 4:23 | 3 | 2 | 1:46 | Punt |
| BUF | Q3 2:37 | 4 | 29 | 2:13 | Fumble |
| CHI | Q3 0:24 | 5 | 53 | 2:25 | Downs |
| BUF | Q4 12:59 | 2 | 3 | 0:46 | Interception |
| CHI | Q4 12:13 | 4 | 1 | 1:54 | Field goal |
| BUF | Q4 10:19 | 3 | 1 | 1:06 | Punt |
| CHI | Q4 9:13 | 3 | -2 | 1:52 | Punt |
| BUF | Q4 7:21 | 8 | 56 | 3:36 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q4 3:45 | 4 | -4 | 1:37 | Downs |
| BUF | Q4 2:08 | 4 | 20 | 1:06 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q4 1:02 | 5 | 25 | 1:02 | Interception |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Bills vs Bears Head-to-Head
The Bills and Bears first met in 1970 and have played 14 times since.
- All-time series
- 8–6Bears lead, 14 meetings since 1970
- Postseason
- 0No playoff meetings
- Largest Bills win
- 35–132022
- Largest Bears win
- 40–72006
Since 2021
1–0 Bills lead
1 meeting since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- BUF
Oldest to newest. BUF = Bills win, CHI = Bears win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 15 Bears at Bills Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2022 Wk 16 Bills at Bears BUF 35 CHI 13 BUF W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2022 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Bills | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 13-3 | Record | 3-14 |
| 28.4 | Points per game | 19.2 |
| 397.6 | Yards per game | 307.8 |
| 6.1 | Yards per play | 5.3 |
| 17.9 | Points allowed per game | 27.2 |
| 319.1 | Yards allowed per game | 375.9 |
Bills vs Bears Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- BUF −8Bills covered by 14
- Total
- 40.5Over: 48 points scored (by 7.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bills | 24.3 | 35 | +10.8 |
| Bears | 16.3 | 13 | −3.3 |
The Bills beat their implied total and the Bears fell short of theirs; the Fantasy tab has the player lines behind it.
Betting Trends
Each team's 2022 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Buffalo Bills
- Against the spread
- 7–8
- Over/under
- 5–10
- ATS as favorite
- 7–8
- ATS on the road
- 4–4
Chicago Bears
- Against the spread
- 5–9–1
- Over/under
- 10–5
- ATS as favorite
- 0–1–1
- ATS as underdog
- 5–8
- ATS at home
- 3–4–1
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Bills vs Bears Fantasy Outlook for 2026
One meeting is left on the 2026 schedule: Week 15 in Buffalo. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Bills or Bears player start in Week 15? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Bills and Bears players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Bills and Bears defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere this matchup falls in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2022 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Bills vs Bears Game FAQ
Who won the 2022 Bills vs Bears Week 16 game?
The Buffalo Bills beat the Chicago Bears 35–13 in Week 16 of the 2022 season. The game was played at Soldier Field in Chicago, IL, on December 24, 2022. See the Bills' 2022 schedule.
What was the final score of Bills vs Bears?
The final score was Bills 35, Bears 13. The Bears led 10–6 at halftime, and the second half went Bills 29, Bears 3.
What happened in the Bills vs Bears game?
Buffalo erased a 10–6 halftime deficit, outscoring Chicago 29–3 after the break to win 35–13. The Bills finished with a 426–209 edge in total offense and averaged 7.3 yards per play. Josh Allen led all players with 15 of 26 passing for 172 yards and 2 touchdowns, plus 6 carries for 41 rushing yards and a touchdown. The Bills committed 3 turnovers, the Bears 2.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Bills vs Bears?
Josh Allen led the game with 25.0 PPR fantasy points, the QB4 of Week 16, on 15 of 26 passing for 172 yards and 2 touchdowns, plus 6 carries for 41 rushing yards and a touchdown. Devin Singletary was next with 20.5 (RB7). See Josh Allen's 2022 game log.
Who led Bills vs Bears in passing, rushing and receiving?
Josh Allen (BUF) led all passers with 15 of 26 for 172 yards, 2 touchdowns and 2 interceptions. Devin Singletary (BUF) led in rushing with 12 carries for 106 yards and a touchdown. Velus Jones (CHI) led in receiving with 2 catches for 52 yards.
How many fantasy points did Josh Allen score against the Bears?
Josh Allen scored 25.0 fantasy points against the Bears in Week 16 of the 2022 season, the same in PPR, half-PPR and standard scoring because he had no catches, on 15 of 26 passing for 172 yards and 2 touchdowns, plus 6 carries for 41 rushing yards and a touchdown.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Bills vs Bears?
Josh Allen outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 25.0 PPR points on 14.9 xFP (+10.1). David Montgomery fell furthest short, with 10.4 points on 17.0 xFP (−6.6). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Bills vs Bears?
David Montgomery had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 17.0 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 10.4. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Bills beat the Bears?
The Bills beat the Bears 35–13 because they averaged 7.3 yards per play to 3.5 and outgained them 426–209.
Which team won the turnover battle in Bills vs Bears?
The Bears won the turnover battle 3–2: the Bills gave the ball away 3 times and the Bears 2 times. The Bills won the game anyway.
What is the all-time Bills vs Bears record?
The Bears lead the all-time series 8–6 across 14 meetings since 1970.
When did the Bills and Bears last play before this game?
Before Week 16 of 2022, they last met in the 2018 season on November 4, 2018, when the Bears beat the Bills 41–9.
What was the closing spread for Bills vs Bears?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Bills −8, making the Buffalo Bills 8-point favorites, with a closing total of 40.5. That implied about 24.3 points for the Bills and 16.3 for the Bears.
Did Bills vs Bears go over or under the total?
The game went over. The consensus closing total was 40.5, and the teams combined for 48 points, 7.5 over the number.
Who covered the spread in Bills vs Bears?
The Bills covered by 14 against the closing line of Bills −8. The final margin was 22 points.
